Cytosolic RNase inhibitor only affects RNases with intrinsic cytotoxicity

Cytosolic RNase inhibitor binds to and neutralizes most members of the pancreatic type RNase superfamily. However, there are a few exceptions, e.g. amphibian onconase and bovine seminal RNase, and these are endowed with cytotoxic activity. Also, RNase variants created by mutagenesis to partially evade the RNase inhibitor acquire cytotoxic activity. These findings have led to the proposal that the cytosolic inhibitor acts as a sentry to protect mammalian cells from foreign RNases. We silenced the expression of the gene encoding the cytosolic inhibitor in HeLa cells and found that the cells become more sensitive to foreign cytotoxic RNases. However foreign, non-cytotoxic RNases remain non-cytotoxic. These results indicate that the cytosolic inhibitor neutralizes those foreign RNases that are intrinsically cytotoxic and have access to the cytosol. However, its normal physiological role may not be to guard against foreign RNases in general.     

The role of electrostatic interactions in the antitumor activity of dimeric RNases

The cytotoxic action of some ribonucleases homologous to bovine pancreatic RNase A, the superfamily prototype, has interested and intrigued investigators. Their ribonucleolytic activity is essential for their cytotoxic action, and their target RNA is in the cytosol. It has been proposed that the cytosolic RNase inhibitor (cRI) plays a major role in determining the ability of an RNase to be cytotoxic. However, to interact with cRI RNases must reach the cytosol, and cross intracellular membranes. To investigate the interactions of cytotoxic RNases with membranes, cytotoxic dimeric RNases resistant, or considered to be resistant to cRI, were assayed for their effects on negatively charged membranes. Furthermore, we analyzed the electrostatic interaction energy of the RNases complexed in silico with a model membrane. The results of this study suggest that close correlations can be recognized between the cytotoxic action of a dimeric RNase and its ability to complex and destabilize negatively charged membranes.     

Cytotoxicity of RNases is increased by cationization and counteracted by K(Ca) channels

K(Ca) channels are involved in control of cell proliferation and differentiation. Here we have revealed their role in overcoming the RNase-induced cytotoxicity. Toxic effects of Streptomyces aureofaciens RNases Sa, Sa2, Sa3, and of RNase Sa charge reversal mutants on the human embryonic kidney cell lines differing only by the presence of K(Ca) channels were characterized. In contrast to other RNases, a basic variant of RNase Sa and RNase Sa3 exhibit significant cytotoxic activity of the same order of magnitude as onconase. Our data indicate the absence of a correlation between catalytic activity and stability of RNases and cytotoxicity. On the other hand, cationization enhances toxic effect of an RNase indicating the major role of a positive charge. Essentially lower sensitivity to cytotoxic microbial RNases of cells expressing K(Ca) channels was found. These results suggest that cells without the K(Ca) channel activity cannot counteract toxic effect of RNases.     

Why ribonucleases induce tumor cell death

The characteristics and the possible mechanisms of action of cytotoxic ribonucleases (RNases), promising antitumor drugs, are described. Original experimental data and the results of analysis of recent publications have made it possible to identify the cellular components providing for the selective effects of exogenous RNases on tumor cells, on the one hand, and to estimate the contributions of individual molecular determinants to the enzyme cytotoxicity, on the other hand. The predominant effect of the electric charge of the RNase molecule on the induction of cell death has been demonstrated. The cytotoxic effects of RNases are determined by the catalytic cleavage of accessible RNA, the action of the products of its hydrolysis, and the noncatalytic electrostatic interaction of the exogenous enzyme with cell components. Potential RNase targets in a tumor cell and the role of modulation of calcium-dependent potassium channels and the ras oncogene in RNase-induced cell damage are considered. The effect of cytotoxic RNases on gene expression by affecting RNA interference is discussed.Translated from Molekulyarnaya Biologiya, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2005, pp. 3–13.Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 by Ilinskaya, Makarov.     

Natural and engineered ribonucleases as potential cancer therapeutics

By reason of their cytotoxicity, ribonucleases (RNases) are potential anti-tumor drugs. Particularly members from the RNase A and RNase T1 superfamilies have shown promising results. Among these enzymes, Onconase, an RNase from the Northern Leopard frog, is furthest along in clinical trials. A general model for the mechanism of the cytotoxic action of RNases includes the interaction of the enzyme with the cellular membrane, internalization, translocation to the cytosol, and degradation of ribonucleic acid. The interplay of these processes as well as the role of the thermodynamic and proteolytic stability, the catalytic activity, and the capability of the RNase to evade the intracellular RNase inhibitor has not yet been fully elucidated. This paper discusses the various approaches to exploit RNases as cytotoxic agents.     

Ribonucleases of different origins with a wide spectrum of medicinal applications

Ribonucleases (RNases) are a type of nucleases that catalyze the degradation of RNA into smaller components. They exist in a wide range of life forms from prokaryotes to eukaryotes. RNase-controlled RNA degradation is a determining factor in the control of gene expression, maturation and turnover, which are further associated with the progression of cancers and infectious diseases. Over the years, RNases purified from multiple origins have drawn increasing attention from medical scientists due to their remarkable antitumor properties. In this review, we present a brief summary of the representative RNases of fungal, bacterial, plant, and animal origins and outline their potential medicinal value in the treatment of tumor and AIDS. Among them, the most clinically promising RNases are mushroom RNases, Binase and Barnase from bacteria, ginseng RNases, and Onconase from frog (Rana pipiens). Fast developing protein engineering of RNases, which display more potent cytotoxic activity on and greater selectivity for malignant cells, has also aroused the interest of researchers. The multiple anti-cancer mechanisms of RNases are also included. To sum up, these inspiring studies unveil a new perspective for RNases as potential therapeutic agents.     

Why ribonucleases cause death of cancer cells

Molecular properties and possible mechanisms of action of cytotoxic ribonucleases (RNases), potential antitumor therapeutics, are characterized. The analysis of recent publications and own experimental results have allowed the authors, on the one hand, to distinguish cellular components that are responsible for selective activity of exogenous RNases towards malignant cells, and on the other--to identify the contribution of definite molecular determinants to the enzyme cytotoxicity. The predominant effect of the RNase molecule charge on the cell death induction is shown. The RNase cytotoxic effects are caused by catalytic cleavage of available RNA, by products of its hydrolysis, as well as by non-catalytic electrostatic interaction of exogenous enzyme with cell components. Potential targets for RNase action in a cancer cell have been revealed. The role of modulation of the membrane calcium-dependent potassium channels and ras-oncogene functions in the RNase-induced cell damage is defined. The effect of cytotoxic RNases on gene expression via influencing the RNA interference is discussed.     

Crystal structure of RNase A tandem enzymes and their interaction with the cytosolic ribonuclease inhibitor

Because of their ability to degrade RNA, RNases are potent cytotoxins. The cytotoxic activity of most members of the RNase A superfamily, however, is abolished by the cytosolic ribonuclease inhibitor (RI). RNase A tandem enzymes, in which two RNase A molecules are artificially connected by a peptide linker, and thus have a pseudodimeric structure, exhibit remarkable cytotoxic activity. In vitro, however, these enzymes are still inhibited by RI. Here, we present the crystal structures of three tandem enzymes with the linker sequences GPPG, SGSGSG, and SGRSGRSG, which allowed us to analyze the mode of binding of RI to the RNase A tandem enzymes. Modeling studies with the crystal structures of the RI-RNase A complex and the SGRSGRSG-RNase A tandem enzyme as templates suggested a 1 : 1 binding stoichiometry for the RI-RNase A tandem enzyme complex, with binding of the RI molecule to the N-terminal RNase A entity. These results were experimentally verified by analytical ultracentrifugation, quantitative electrophoresis, and proteolysis studies with trypsin. As other dimeric RNases, which are comparably cytotoxic, either evade RI binding or potentially even bind two RI molecules, inactivation by RI cannot be the crucial limitation to the cytotoxicity of dimeric RNases.     

Endocytotic internalization as a crucial factor for the cytotoxicity of ribonucleases

The cytotoxic action of ribonucleases (RNases) requires the interaction of the enzyme with the cellular membrane, its internalization, translocation to the cytosol, and the degradation of ribonucleic acid. The interplay of these processes as well as the role of the thermodynamic and proteolytic stability, the catalytic activity, and the evasion from the intracellular ribonuclease inhibitor (RI) has not yet been fully elucidated. As cytosolic internalization is indispensable for the cytotoxicity of extracellular ribonucleases, we investigated the extent of cytosolic internalization of a cytotoxic, RI-evasive RNase A variant (G88R-RNase A) and of various similarly cytotoxic but RI-sensitive RNase A tandem enzyme variants in comparison to the internalization of the non-cytotoxic and RI-sensitive RNase A. After incubation of K-562 cells with the RNase A variants for 36 h, the internalized amount of RNases was analyzed by rapid cell disruption followed by subcellular fractionation and semiquantitative immunoblotting. The data indicate that an enhanced cellular uptake and an increased entry of the RNases into the cytosol can outweigh the abolishment of catalytic activity by RI. As all RNase A variants proved to be resistant to the proteases present in the different subcellular fractions for more than 100 h, our results suggest that the cytotoxic potency of RNases is determined by an efficient internalization into the cytosol.     

Inhibition of cell growth by a fused protein of human ribonuclease 1 and human basic fibroblast growth factor

Pancreatic-type RNases are considered to have cytotoxic potential due to their ability to degrade RNA molecules when they enter the cytosol. However, most of these RNases show little cytotoxicity because cells have no active uptake mechanism for these RNases and because the ubiquitous cytoplasmic RNase inhibitor is considered to play a protective role against the endocytotic leak of RNases from the outside of cells. To study the cytotoxic potential of RNase toward malignant cells targeting growth factor receptors, the C-terminus of human RNase 1 was fused to the N-terminus of human basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). This RNase-FGF fused protein effectively inhibited the growth of mouse melanoma cell line B16/BL6 with high levels of cell surface FGF receptor. This effect appeared to result from prolongation of the overall cell cycle rather than the killing of cells or specific arrest in a particular phase of the cell cycle. Thus, human RNase 1 fused to a ligand of cell surface molecules, such as the FGF receptor, is shown to be an effective candidate for a selective cell targeting agent with low toxic effects on normal cell types.     

On the track of antitumour ribonucleases

Ribonucleases (RNases) are potential alternatives to non-mutagenic antitumour drugs. Among these enzymes, onconase, bovine-seminal ribonuclease and the Rana catesbeiana and Rana japonica lectins exert a cytotoxic activity that is selective for tumour cells. A model for the mechanism of cytotoxicity of these RNases which involves different steps is generally accepted. The model predicts that cytotoxicity requires interaction of the RNases with the cell membrane and internalisation to occur by endocytosis. Then, at a precise point, the RNases are translocated to the cytosol where they cleave cellular RNA if they have been able to preserve their ribonucleolytic activity. The cleavage of cellular RNA induces apoptosis but there is evidence suggesting that RNase-triggered apoptosis does not entirely result from the inhibition of protein synthesis. How efficiently a particular RNase carries out each of the steps determines its potency as a cytotoxin.     

Targeting phosphodiesterases as a strategy for killing tumor cells

Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics - ribonucleases (RNases) are being employed as alternative cytotoxic proteins to the conventionally used ones such as ricin andPseudomonas exotoxin. Mammalian...     

The combined action of binase and bleomycin on human lung adenocarcinoma cells

Some microbial ribonucleases (RNases) demonstrate selective cytotoxic effect against a wide range of tumor cells. In this context combined use of cytotoxic RNases in complex therapy with other chemotherapeutic agents appears to be especially promising. In this study we have investigated the apoptosisinduced effect of Bacillus pumilus RNase (binase) in combination with known antitumor antibiotic bleomycin on human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells. The combined effect of high concentrations of these agents did not have any mutual increase in their apoptosisinduced action, while a combination of nonapoptotic concentrations resulted in the increase of proportion of apoptotic cells up to 22% as compared with individual effect of bleomycin (6%) and binase (12%) used separately. These results indicate that binase and bleomycin are effective in combination of their low concentrations and ineffective in combination of their high concentrations.     

RNase 3 (ECP) is an extraordinarily stable protein among human pancreatic-type RNases

There have been some attempts to develop immunotoxins utilizing human RNase as a cytotoxic domain of antitumor agents. We have recently shown that only human RNase 3 (eosinophil cationic protein, ECP) among five human pancreatic-type RNases excels in binding to the cell surface and has a growth inhibition effect on several cancer cell lines, even though the RNase activity of RNase 3 is completely inhibited by the ubiquitously expressed cytosolic RNase inhibitor. This phenomenon may be explained by that RNase 3 is very stable against proteolytic degradation because RNase 3 internalized through endocytosis could have a longer life time in the cytosol, resulting in the accumulation of enough of it to exceed the concentration of RNase inhibitor, which allows the degradation of cytosolic RNA molecules. Thus, we compared the stabilities of human pancreatic-type RNases (RNases 1-5) and bovine RNase A by means of guanidium chloride-induced denaturation experiments based on the assumption of a two-state transition for unfolding. It was demonstrated that RNase 3 is extraordinarily stabler than either RNase A or the other human RNases (by more than 25 kJ/mol). Thus, our data suggest that in addition to its specific affinity for certain cancer cell lines, the stability of RNase 3 contributes to its unique cytotoxic effect and that it is important to stabilize a human RNase moiety through protein engineering for the design of human RNase-based immunotoxins.     

Interactions of the cytotoxic RNase A dimers with the cytosolic ribonuclease inhibitor

Ribonuclease A (RNase A) dimers have been recently found to be endowed with some of the special, i.e., non-catalytic biological activities of RNases, such as antitumor and aspermatogenic activities. These activities have been so far attributed to RNases which can escape the neutralizing action of the cytosolic RNase inhibitor (cRI). However, when the interactions of the two cytotoxic RNase A dimers with cRI were investigated in a quantitative fashion and at the molecular level, the dimers were found to bind cRI with high affinity and to form tight complexes.     

Barnase and binase: twins with distinct fates

RNases are enzymes that cleave RNAs, resulting in remarkably diverse biological consequences. Many RNases are cytotoxic. In some cases, they attack selectively malignant cells triggering an apoptotic response. A number of eukaryotic and bacterial RNase-based strategies are being developed for use in anticancer and antiviral therapy. However, the physiological functions of these RNases are often poorly understood. This review focuses on the properties of the extracellular RNases from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (barnase) and Bacillus intermedius (binase), the characteristics of their biosynthesis regulation and their physiological role, with an emphasis on the similarities and differences. Barnase and binase can be regarded as molecular twins according to their highly similar structure, physical-chemical and catalytic properties. Nevertheless, the 'life paths' of these enzymes are not the same, as their expression in bacteria is controlled by diverse signals. Binase is predominantly synthesized under phosphate starvation, whereas barnase production is strictly dependent on the multifunctional Spo0A regulator controlling sporulation, biofilm formation and cannibalism. Barnase and binase also have some distinctions in practical applications. Barnase was initially suggested to be useful in research and biotechnology as a tool for studying protein-protein interactions, for RNA elimination from biological samples, for affinity purification of RNase fusion proteins, for the development of cloning vectors and for sterility acquisition by transgenic plants. Binase, as later barnase, was tested for antiviral, antitumour and immunogenic effects. Both RNases have found their own niche in cancer research as a result of success in targeted delivery and selectivity towards tumour cells.     

Ubiquitin–proteasome‐mediated degradation of S‐RNase in a solanaceous cross‐compatibility reaction

Many plants have a self‐incompatibility (SI) system in which the rejection of self‐pollen is determined by multiple haplotypes at a single locus, termed S. In the Solanaceae, each haplotype encodes a single ribonuclease (S‐RNase) and multiple S‐locus F‐box proteins (SLFs), which function as the pistil and pollen SI determinants, respectively. S‐RNase is cytotoxic to self‐pollen, whereas SLFs are thought to collaboratively recognize non‐self S‐RNases in cross‐pollen and detoxify them via the ubiquitination pathway. However, the actual mechanism of detoxification remains unknown. Here we isolate the components of a SCF^SLF (SCF = SKP1‐CUL1‐F‐box‐RBX1) from Petunia pollen. The SCF^SLF polyubiquitinates a subset of non‐self S‐RNases in vitro. The polyubiquitinated S‐RNases are degraded in the pollen extract, which is attenuated by a proteasome inhibitor. Our findings suggest that multiple SCF^SLF complexes in cross‐pollen polyubiquitinate non‐self S‐RNases, resulting in their degradation by the proteasome.     

Nucleotide binding architecture for secreted cytotoxic endoribonucleases

Vertebrate secreted RNases are small cationic protein endowed with an endoribonuclease activity that belong to the RNase A superfamily and display diverse cytotoxic activities. In an effort to unravel their mechanism of action, we have analysed their nucleotide binding recognition patterns. General shared features with other nucleotide binding proteins were deduced from overall statistics on the available structure complexes at the Protein Data Bank and compared with the particularities of selected representative endoribonuclease families. Results were compared with other endoribonuclease representative families and with the overall protein–nucleotide interaction features. Preferred amino acids and atom types involved in pair bonding interactions were identified, defining the spatial motives for phosphate, base and ribose building blocks. Together with the conserved catalytic triad at the active site, variability was observed for secondary binding subsites that may contribute to the proper substrate alignment and could explain the distinct substrate preference patterns. Highly conserved binding patterns were identified for the pyrimidine and purine subsites at the main and secondary base subsites. Particular substitution could be ascribed to specific adenine or guanine specificities. Distribution of evolutionary conserved residues were compared to search for the structure determinants that underlie their diverse catalytic efficiency and those that may account for putative physiological substrate targets or other non-catalytic biological activities that contribute to the antipathogen role of the RNases involved in the host defence system. A side by side comparison with another endoribonuclease superfamily of secreted cytotoxic proteins, the microbial RNases, was carried on to analyse the common features and peculiarities that rule their substrate recognition. The data provides the structural basis for the development of applied therapies targeting cellular nucleotide polymers.     

Preparation of potent cytotoxic ribonucleases by cationization: enhanced cellular uptake and decreased interaction with ribonuclease inhibitor by chemical modification of carboxyl groups.

Carboxyl groups of bovine RNase A were amidated with ethylenediamine (to convert negative charges of carboxylate anions to positive ones), 2-aminoethanol (to eliminate negative charges), and taurine (to keep negative charges), respectively, by a carbodiimide reaction. Human RNase 1 was also modified with ethylenediamine. Surprisingly, the modified RNases were all cytotoxic toward 3T3-SV-40 cells despite their decreased ribonucleolytic activity. However, their enzymatic activity was not completely eliminated by the presence of excess cytosolic RNase inhibitor (RI). As for native RNase A and RNase 1 which were not cytotoxic, they were completely inactivated by RI. More interestingly, within the cytotoxic RNase derivatives, cytotoxicity correlated well with the net positive charge. RNase 1 and RNase A modified with ethylenediamine were more cytotoxic than naturally occurring cytotoxic bovine seminal RNase. An experiment using the fluorescence-labeled RNase derivatives indicated that the more cationic RNases were more efficiently adsorbed to the cells. Thus, it is suggested that the modification of carboxyl groups could change complementarity of RNase to RI and as a result endow RNase cytotoxicity and that cationization enhances the efficiency of cellular uptake of RNase so as to strengthen its cytotoxicity. The finding that an extracellular human enzyme such as RNase 1 could be effectively internalized into the cell by cationization suggests that cationization is a simple strategy for efficient delivery of a protein into cells and may open the way of the development of new therapeutics.     

The role of mammalian ribonucleases (RNases) in cancer

Ribonucleases (RNases) are a group of enzymes that cleave RNAs at phosphodiester bonds resulting in remarkably diverse biological consequences. This review focuses on mammalian RNases that are capable of, or potentially capable of, cleaving messenger RNA (mRNA) as well as other RNAs in cells and play roles in the development of human cancers. The aims of this review are to provide an overview of the roles of currently known mammalian RNases, and the evidence that associate them as regulators of tumor development. The roles of these RNases as oncoproteins and/or tumor suppressors in influencing cell growth, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and other cellular hallmarks of cancer will be presented and discussed. The RNases under discussion include RNases from the conventional mRNA decay pathways, RNases that are activated under cellular stress, RNases from the miRNA pathway, and RNases with multifunctional activity.