Frameshift Suppression in SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE. III. Isolation and Genetic Properties of Group III Suppressors

Suppressors of ICR-induced mutations that exhibit behavior similar to bacterial frameshift suppressors have been identified in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The yeast suppressors have been divided into two groups. Previous evidence indicated that suppressors of one group (Group II: SUF1, SUF3, SUF4, SUF5 and SUF6) represent mutations in the structural genes for glycyl-tRNA's. Suppressors of the other group (Group III: SUF2 and SUF7) were less well characterized. Although they suppressed some ICR-revertible mutations, they failed to suppress Group II frameshift mutations. This communication provides a more thorough characterization of the Group III suppressors and describes the isolation and properties of four new suppressors in that group (SUF8, SUF9, SUF10 and suf11).——In our original study, Group III suppressors were isolated as revertants of the Group III mutations his4–712 and his4–713. All suppressors obtained as ICR-induced revertants of these mutations mapped at the SUF2 locus near the centromere of chromosome III. Suppressors mapping at other loci were obtained in this study by analyzing spontaneous and UV-induced revertants of the Group III mutations. SUF2 and SUF10 suppress both Group III his4 mutations, whereas SUF7, SUF8, SUF9 and suf11 suppress his4–713, but not his4–712. All of the suppressors except suf11 are dominant in diploids homozygous for his4-713. The suppressors fail to suppress representative UAA, UAG and UGA nonsense mutations.——SUF9 is linked to the centromere of chromosome VI, and SUF10 is linked to the centromere of chromosome XIV. A triploid mapping procedure was used to determine the chromosome locations of SUF7 and SUF8. Subsequent standard crosses revealed linkage of SUF7 to cdc5 on chromosome XIII and linkage of SUF8 to cdc12 and pet3 on chromosome VIII.     

Frameshift Suppression in SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE. II. Genetic Properties of Group II Suppressors

Suppressors of ICR-induced mutations that exhibit behavior similar to bacterial frameshift suppressors have been identified in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The yeast suppressors have been divided into two groups. One of these groups (Group II: SUF1, SUF3, SUF4, SUF5 and SUF6) appears to include a set of informational suppressors in which the vehicle of suppression is glycyl-tRNA. Some of the genetic properties of Group II suppressors are described in this communication.——Corevertants of the Group II frameshift mutations his4–519 and leu2–3 have been characterized to determine the spectrum of reversion events induced by the frameshift mutagen ICR-170. Seventythree ICR-induced corevertants were analyzed. With the exception of one corevertant, which carried an allele of SUF1, all carried alleles of SUF3 or SUF5. SUF1, SUF3, SUF4 and SUF6 were represented among spontaneous and UV-induced corevertants. In the course of these experiments one of the suppressors was mapped. SUF5, the probable structural gene for tRNA^GLY1, is located between ade2 and ade9 on chromosome XV.——SUF1, SUF4 and SUF6 have novel properties and comprise a distinct subset of suppressors. Although these suppressors show no genetic linkage to each other, they share several common features including lethality in haploid pairwise combinations, reduced tRNA^GLY3 isoacceptor activity and increased efficiency of suppression in strains carrying the cytoplasmically inherited [PSI] element. In addition, strains carrying SUF1, SUF4 or SUF6 are phenotypically unstable and give rise to mitotic Suf⁺ segregants at high frequency. These segregants invariably contain a linked, second-site mutation that maps in or adjacent to the suppressor gene itself. Strains carrying any of these suppressors also give rise to mitotic segregants that exhibit enhanced efficiency of suppression; mutations responsible for this phenotype map at two loci, upf1 and upf2. These genes show no genetic linkage to any of the Group II suppressors.——Methods that permit positive selection for mutants with decreased or enhanced efficiency of suppression have been devised in order to examine large numbers of variants. The importance of these interacting mutants is underscored by their potential utility in studying suppressor function at the molecular level.     

Frameshift suppressor mutations affecting the major glycine transfer RNAs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Mutations have been identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae glycine tRNA genes that result in suppression of +1 frameshift mutations in glycine codons. Wild-type and suppressor alleles of genes encoding the two major glycine tRNAs, tRNA(GCC) and tRNA(UCC), were examined in this study. The genes were identified by genetic complementation and by hybridization to a yeast genomic library using purified tRNA probes. tRNA(UCC) is encoded by three genes, whereas approximately 15 genes encode tRNA(GCC). The frameshift suppressor genes suf1+, suf4+ and suf6+ were shown to encode the wild-type tRNA(UCC) tRNA. The suf1+ and suf4+ genes were identical in DNA sequence, whereas the suf6+ gene, whose DNA sequence was not determined, was shown by a hybridization experiment to encode tRNA(UCC). The ultraviolet light-induced SU F1-1 and spontaneous SU F4-1 suppressor mutations were each shown to differ from wild-type at two positions in the anticodon, including a +1 base-pair insertion and a base-pair substitution. These changes resulted in a CCCC four-base anticodon rather than the CCU three-base anticodon found in wild-type. The RNA sequence of tRNA(UCC) was shown to contain a modified uridine in the wobble position. Mutant tRNA(CCCC) isolated from a SU F1-1 strain lacked this modification. Three unlinked genes that encode wild-type tRNA(GCC), suf20+, trn2, and suf17+, were identical in DNA sequence to the previously described suf16+ frameshift suppressor gene. Spontaneous suppressor mutations at the SU F20 and SU F17 loci were analyzed. The SU F20-2 suppressor allele contained a CCCC anticodon. This allele was derived in two serial selections through two independent mutational events, a +1 base insertion and a base substitution in the anticodon. Presumably, the original suppressor allele, SU F20-1, contained the single base insertion. The SU F17-1 suppressor allele also contained a CCCC anticodon resulting from two mutations, a +1 insertion and a base substitution. However, this allele contained an additional base substitution at position 33 adjacent to the 5' side of the four-base anticodon. The possible origin and significance of multiple mutations leading to frameshift suppression is discussed.     

Molecular cloning of the SUF2 frameshift suppressor gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

A genetic approach to the molecular cloning of frameshift suppressor genes from yeast is described. These suppressors act by suppressing +1 G:C base-pair insertion mutations in glycine or proline codons. The cloning regimen involves an indirect screen for yeast transformants which harbor a functional suppressor gene inserted into the autonomously replicating “shuttle” vector YEp13, followed by transfer of the hybrid plasmid from yeast into Escherichia coli. Using this procedure a 10.7-kb DNA fragment carrying the SUF2 frameshift suppressor gene has been isolated. This suppressor acts specifically on +1 G:C insertions in proline codons. When inserted into an integrative vehicle and reintroduced into yeast by transformation, this fragment integrates by homologous recombination in the region of the SUF2 locus on chromosome III. A large proportion of the fragment overlaps with another cloned DNA segment which carries the closely linked CDC10 gene. The SUF2 fragment carries at least two tRNA genes. The SUF2 gene and one of the tRNA genes are located on a 0.85-kb restriction fragment within the 10.7-kb segment. A method is also described for the isolation of DNA fragments carrying alternative alleles of the SUF2 locus. Using this procedure, the wild-type suf2⁺ allele has been cloned.     

Missense and nonsense suppressors can correct frameshift mutations

Missense and nonsense suppressor tRNAs, selected for their ability to read a new triplet codon, were observed to suppress one or more frameshift mutations in trpA of Escherichia coli. Two of the suppressible frameshift mutants, trpA8 and trpA46AspPR3, were cloned, sequenced, and found to be of the +1 type, resulting from the insertion of four nucleotides and one nucleotide, respectively. Twenty-two suppressor tRNAs were examined, 20 derived from one of the 3 glycine isoacceptor species, one from lysT, and one from trpT. The sequences of all but four of the mutant tRNAs are known, and two of those four were converted to suppressor tRNAs that were subsequently sequenced. Consideration of the coding specificities and anticodon sequences of the suppressor tRNAs does not suggest a unitary mechanism of frameshift suppression. Rather, the results indicate that different suppressors may shift frame according to different mechanisms. Examination of the suppression windows of the suppressible frameshift mutations indicates that some of the suppressors may work at cognate codons, either in the 0 frame or in the +1 frame, and others may act at noncognate codons (in either frame) by some as-yet-unspecified mechanism. Whatever the mechanisms, it is clear that some +1 frameshifting can occur at non-monotonous sequences. A striking example of a frameshifting missense suppressor is a mutant lysine tRNA that differs from wild-type lysine tRNA by only a single base in the amino acid acceptor stem, a C to U70 transition that results in a G.U base pair. It is suggested that when this mutant lysine tRNA reads its cognate codon, AAA, the presence of the G.U base pair sometimes leads either to a conformational change in the tRNA or to an altered interaction with some component of the translation machinery involved in translocation, resulting in a shift of reading frame. In general, the results indicate that translocation is not simply a function of anticodon loop size, that different frameshifting mechanisms may operate with different tRNAs, and that conformational features, some far removed from the anticodon region, are involved in maintaining fidelity in translocation.     

Externally Suppressive +1 “Glycine” Frameshift: Possible Quadruplet Isomers for Glycine and Proline

WE have reported our original finding of frameshift suppression in Salmonella^1,2. The frameshift we studied initially was induced in the histidinol dehydrogenase (HDH) gene with the intercalating agent ICR-191 (ref. 3.) It is a +1 type most likely containing an extra C in an mRNA repeat of C residues². External suppressors are efficiently induced by ICR-191 (ref. 1). The suppressors restore small amounts of HDH with the normal amino-acid sequence to the mutant cell⁴. We have hypothesized a proline suppressor tRNA with a quadruplet (+G) anticodon or its functional equivalent^2,4. Prompted by our findings, Riddle and Roth showed that most frameshifts tentatively classified as +1 types by genetic criteria are externally suppressible. Almost all were induced with ICR-191 (ref. 5). Two classes of suppressible frameshift were found, each with a set of mutually exclusive suppressors⁵. Judging from the demonstrated capacity of ICR compounds to produce + 1 additions in DNA repeats of GC pairs, we have further suggested to Riddle and Roth that these two frameshift-suppressor systems represent +1 additions in RNA repeats of C residues (proline codons, glycine anticodons) and in RNA repeats of G residues (glycine codons, proline anticodons)⁴ (personal communication to J. R. Roth, Histidine Workshop, 1970); that is, the two types of +1 frameshift are genetic “isomers”, the one involving proline and the other glycine (Fig. 1). The recent demonstration by Riddle and Roth of altered proline tRNA and glycine tRNA in appropriate suppressed strains⁶ is consistent with this suggestion. Further characterization of frameshifts of the type originally investigated has implicated a proline mRNA quadruplet, CCCg, as a sufficient if not necessary condition for suppression^7,8. A requirement for neighbouring sequences, particularly chain terminating codons, cannot be completely ruled out, however⁸. I have now examined a suppressible frameshift of the second type and present evidence that it contains a +1 addition in or near a glycine codon (Fig. 2). Oddly enough, this mRNA site is followed by an extensive nucleotide sequence reminiscent of two out of three +1 “proline” sequences examined (Fig. 2)⁸. The ICR compounds seem to have a marked bias for inducing suppressible +1 frameshifts in this extensive sequence. Whether some property of this extensive sequence is crucial to suppression is not yet clear.     

Patterns of Genetic and Phenotypic Suppression of lys2 Mutations in the Yeast SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE

A total of 358 lys2 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been characterized for suppressibility by the following suppressors: UAA and UAG suppressors that insert tyrosine, serine or leucine; a putative UGA suppressor; an omnipotent suppressor SUP46; and a frameshift suppressor SUF1–1. In addition, the lys2 mutants were examined for phenotypic suppression by the aminoglycoside antibiotic paromomycin, for osmotic remediability and for temperature sensitivity. The mutants exhibited over 50 different patterns of suppression and most of the nonsense mutants appeared similar to nonsense mutants previously described. A total of 24% were suppressible by one or more of the UAA suppressors, 4% were suppressible by one or more of the UAG suppressors, while only one was suppressible by the UGA suppressor and only one was weakly suppressible by the frameshift suppressor. One mutant responded to both UAA and UAG suppressors, indicating that UAA or UAG mutations at certain rare sites can be exceptions to the specific action of UAA and UAG suppressors. Some of the mutants appeared to require certain types of amino acid replacements at the mutant sites in order to produce a functional gene product, while others appeared to require suppressors that were expressed at high levels. Many of the mutants suppressible by SUP46 and paromomycin were not suppressible by any of the UAA, UAG or UGA suppressors, indicating that omnipotent suppression and phenotypic suppression need not be restricted to nonsense mutations. All of the mutants suppressible by SUP46 were also suppressible by paromomycin, suggesting a common mode of action of omnipotent suppression and phenotypic misreading.     

Intragenic Suppression at the b2 Locus in ASCOBOLUS IMMERSUS. II. Characteristics of the Mutations in Groups A and E

The present report is a study of 60 intragenic suppressors located in the A or E group of the b2 spore-color locus of Ascobolus immersus. The frameshift nature of the suppressors was shown by 19 combinations of plus and minus suppressor mutations. The location of the mutation sites on the genetic map of group A was defined. The conversion pattern of the frameshift suppressors is discussed according to their plus or minus phase shift and their mutagenic origin.     

Yeast UAA suppressors effective in psi+ strains: leucine-inserting suppressors.

We have previously reported the isolation and characterization of UAA suppressors from a haploid strain of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae containing the ψ⁺ non-Mendelian determinant which increases the efficiency of action of certain suppressors (Ono et al., 1979). Most of the suppressors caused the insertion of either tyrosine or serine. In contrast, the pattern of suppression of nutritional markers suggested that the rare suppressor, SUP26, inserted in an amino acid other than tyrosine or serine. In this investigation we report the characterization of additional suppressors, similar to SUP26, that were isolated on a medium lacking uracil and containing canavanine; this medium is expected to exclude serine-inserting suppressors because they do not suppress the ura4-1 marker, and to exclude tyrosine-inserting suppressors because they suppress the can1-100 marker. The total of 155 revertants similar to the SUP26 suppressor were analyzed genetically and these could be assigned to one or another of the six distinct loci SUP26, SUP27, SUP28, SUP29, SUP32 and SUP33. The SUP26, SUP27 and SUP29 loci mapped on chromosomes XII, IV and X, respectively. The detailed map position of the SUP29 suppressor suggests that it may be allelic to the SUP30 suppressor reported by Hawthorne &; Mortimer (1968). These six suppressors had the same pattern of suppression of UAA nutritional markers and all of them had a similar low efficiency of action on the iso-1-cytochrome c mutation cyc1-72. The efficiency of each of these suppressors was increased by a chromosomal allo-suppressor, sal. Each of the six suppressors caused the insertion of leucine in iso-1-cytochrome c at the UAA site of the cyc1-72 mutation. It is suggested that the gene products of these suppressors are redundant forms of the same leucine transfer RNA.     

Suppressors of lysine codons may be misacylated lysine tRNAs

We describe a novel class of missense suppressors that read the codons for lysine at two positions (211 and 234) in the trpA polypeptide of Escherichia coli. The suppressor mutations are highly linked to lysT, a gene for lysine tRNA. The results suggest that the suppressors are misacylated lysine tRNAs that carry glycine or alanine. The mutant codons are apparently suppressed better at position 211 than at position 234, indicating the existence of codon context effects in missense suppression.     

Insertions in the anticodon loop of tRNA1Gln(sufG) and tRNA(Lys) promote quadruplet decoding of CAAA

Base insertion mutations in the anticodons of two different Escherichia coli tRNAs have been isolated that allow suppression of a series of +1 frameshift mutations. Insertion of a U between positions 34 and 35 of tRNAGln1 or addition of a G between positions 36 and 37 of tRNA(Lys) expand the anticodons of both tRNAs similarly to 3'-GUUU(-5') and allow decoding of complementary 5'-CAAA(-3') quadruplets. Analysis of the suppressed mRNA sequences suggests that suppression occurs by pairing of the expanded anticodons to all four bases of the complementary, quadruplet codon. The tRNA Gln mutants are identical to the sufG class of frameshift suppressors isolated both in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and E. coli by Kohno and Roth and previously thought to affect tRNA(Lys).     

Apparent non-involvement of transfer RNA nucleotidyltransferase in the biosynthesis of Escherichia coli suppressor transfer RNAs

Transfer RNA nucleotidyltransferase has previously been shown to be required for the normal growth of Escherichia coli and for the biosynthesis of some bacteriophage T4 tRNAs. In order to obtain information about the involvement of this enzyme in E. coli tRNA biosynthesis we have measured the level of activity of suppressors 1 to 6 in strains carrying either a cca⁺ or cca allele. We found that cca strains, deficient in tRNA nucleotidyltransferase, contained the same amount of suppressor activities as the wild-type cca⁺ strains as determined by suppression of nonsense mutations in both E. coli alkaline phosphatase and in genes of bacteriophage T4. The results suggest that tRNA nucleotidyltransferase is not required for the biosynthesis of tRNAs specified by suppressors 1 to 6.     

Codon recognition by glycine transfer RNAs of Escherichia coli in vivo

In order to provide evidence concerning the nature of codon recognition by isoaccepting transfer RNAs of Escherichia coli in vivo, we have carried out genetic experiments with appropriate glycine tRNA mutants that display altered coding specificities. Others have demonstrated that in the ribosome-triplet binding assay glyT tRNA is the only glycine-accepting tRNA that can respond to the glycine codon GGA. Using glyT-derived translational suppressors that respond to AGA, GAA, AAG, UGA and UGG, we have shown that glyT tRNA is indeed the only GGA-reader in vivo and that, rather than using a “two out of three” method of codon recognition, glycine tRNAs in the E. coli cell recognize all three nucleotides of a codon. Furthermore, the data suggest that some mutationally altered glyT tRNAs exhibit an unorthodox wobble in response to the first or second position of a codon.     

The output of the tRNA modification pathways controlled by the Escherichia coli MnmEG and MnmC enzymes depends on the growth conditions and the tRNA species

In Escherichia coli, the MnmEG complex modifies transfer RNAs (tRNAs) decoding NNA/NNG codons. MnmEG catalyzes two different modification reactions, which add an aminomethyl (nm) or carboxymethylaminomethyl (cmnm) group to position 5 of the anticodon wobble uridine using ammonium or glycine, respectively. In and , however, cmnm⁵ appears as the final modification, whereas in the remaining tRNAs, the MnmEG products are converted into 5-methylaminomethyl (mnm⁵) through the two-domain, bi-functional enzyme MnmC. MnmC(o) transforms cmnm⁵ into nm⁵, whereas MnmC(m) converts nm⁵ into mnm⁵, thus producing an atypical network of modification pathways. We investigate the activities and tRNA specificity of MnmEG and the MnmC domains, the ability of tRNAs to follow the ammonium or glycine pathway and the effect of mnmC mutations on growth. We demonstrate that the two MnmC domains function independently of each other and that and are substrates for MnmC(m), but not MnmC(o). Synthesis of mnm⁵s²U by MnmEG-MnmC in vivo avoids build-up of intermediates in . We also show that MnmEG can modify all the tRNAs via the ammonium pathway. Strikingly, the net output of the MnmEG pathways in vivo depends on growth conditions and tRNA species. Loss of any MnmC activity has a biological cost under specific conditions.     

Evidence that the supE44 Mutation of Escherichia coli Is an Amber Suppressor Allele of glnX and that It Also Suppresses Ochre and Opal Nonsense Mutations

Translational readthrough of nonsense codons is seen not only in organisms possessing one or more tRNA suppressors but also in strains lacking suppressors. Amber suppressor tRNAs have been reported to suppress only amber nonsense mutations, unlike ochre suppressors, which can suppress both amber and ochre mutations, essentially due to wobble base pairing. In an Escherichia coli strain carrying the lacZU118 episome (an ochre mutation in the lacZ gene) and harboring the supE44 allele, suppression of the ochre mutation was observed after 7 days of incubation. The presence of the supE44 lesion in the relevant strains was confirmed by sequencing, and it was found to be in the duplicate copy of the glnV tRNA gene, glnX. To investigate this further, an in vivo luciferase assay developed by D. W. Schultz and M. Yarus (J. Bacteriol. 172:595-602, 1990) was employed to evaluate the efficiency of suppression of amber (UAG), ochre (UAA), and opal (UGA) mutations by supE44. We have shown here that supE44 suppresses ochre as well as opal nonsense mutations, with comparable efficiencies. The readthrough of nonsense mutations in a wild-type E. coli strain was much lower than that in a supE44 strain when measured by the luciferase assay. Increased suppression of nonsense mutations, especially ochre and opal, by supE44 was found to be growth phase dependent, as this phenomenon was only observed in stationary phase and not in logarithmic phase. These results have implications for the decoding accuracy of the translational machinery, particularly in stationary growth phase.Translation termination is mediated by one of the three stop codons (UAA, UAG, or UGA). When such stop codons arise in coding sequences due to mutations, referred to as nonsense mutations, they lead to abrupt arrest of the translation process. However, the termination efficiency of such nonsense codons is not 100%, as certain tRNAs have the ability to read these nonsense codons. Genetic code ambiguity is seen in several organisms. Stop codons have been shown to have alternate roles apart from translation termination. In organisms from all three domains of life, UGA encodes selenocysteine through a specialized mechanism. In Methanosarcinaceae, UAG encodes pyrrolysine (3). UAA and UAG are read as glutamine codons in some green algae and ciliates such as Tetrahymena and Diplomonads (24), and UAG alone encodes glutamine in Moloney murine leukemia virus (32). UGA encodes cysteine in Euplotes; tryptophan in some ciliates, Mycoplasma species, Spiroplasma citri, Bacillus, and tobacco rattle virus; and an unidentified amino acid in Pseudomicrothorax dubius and Nyctotherus ovalis (30). In certain cases the context of the stop codon in translational readthrough has been shown to play a role; for example, it has been reported that in vitro in tobacco mosaic virus, UAG and UAA are misread by tRNA^Tyr in a highly context-dependent manner (34, 9).Termination suppressors are of three types, i.e., amber, ochre, and opal suppressors, which are named based on their ability to suppress the three stop codons. Amber suppressors can suppress only amber codons, whereas ochre suppressors can suppress ochre codons (by normal base pairing) as well as amber codons (by wobbling) and opal suppressors can read opal and UGG tryptophan codon in certain cases. As described by Sambrook et al. (27), a few amber suppressors can also suppress ochre mutations by wobbling. The suppression efficiency varies among these suppressors, with amber suppressors generally showing increased efficiency over ochre and opal suppressors. supE44, an amber suppressor tRNA, is an allele of and is found in many commonly used strains of Escherichia coli K-12. Earlier studies have shown that supE44 is a weak amber suppressor and that its efficiency varies up to 35-fold depending on the reading context of the stop codon (8).Translational accuracy depends on several factors, which include charging of tRNAs with specific amino acids, mRNA decoding, and the presence of antibiotics such as streptomycin and mutations in ribosomal proteins which modulate the fidelity of the translational machinery. Among these, mRNA decoding errors have been reported to occur at a frequency ranging from about 10⁻³ to 10⁻⁴ per codon. Translational misreading errors also largely depend on the competition between cognate and near-cognate tRNA species. Poor availability of cognate tRNAs increases misreading (18).Several studies with E. coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae have shown the readthrough of nonsense codons in suppressor-free cells. In a suppressor-free E. coli strain, it has been shown in vitro that glutamine is incorporated at the nonsense codons UAG and UAA (26). It has been reported that overexpression of wild-type tRNA^Gln in yeast suppresses amber as well as ochre mutations (25). In this study, we have confirmed the presence of an amber suppressor mutation in the glnX gene in a supE44 strain by sequence analysis. This was done essentially because we observed that supE44 could also suppress lacZ ochre mutations, albeit inefficiently. On further investigation using an in vivo luciferase reporter assay system for tRNA-mediated nonsense suppression (28), we found that the efficiency of suppression of amber lesion by supE44 is significantly higher than that reported previously in the literature. An increased ability to suppress ochre and opal nonsense mutations was observed in cells bearing supE44 compared to in the wild type. Such an effect was observed only in the stationary phase and was abolished in logarithmic phase.     

Non-suppressible addition frameshift in Salmonella

A frameshift mutation in the histidinol dehydrogenase gene of Salmonella was isolated after induction with the intercalating agent, ICR-191⁴. Reversion of the frameshift, 2578, is strongly enhanced by ICR and by the alkylating agent N-methyl-?-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine. In all cases previously examined, frame-shifts with this reversion profile have proven to be +1 types, most likely containing an extra G·C pair in a DNA repeat of G·C pairs. Most are suppressible by external suppressors, which appear to translate the +1 site on mRNA as proline or glycine. Frameshift 2578, however, is one of a small minority which, while reverted by ICR-191 and N-methyl-?-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, does not appear to be suppressible by external suppressors. Sequence studies of revertant histidinol dehydrogenase suggest that 2578 is an addition of one or two G·C pairs in a DNA repeat of G·C pairs. This addition, however, produces mRNA quadruplets which are in an incorrect phase for suppressor translation.     

Serine-inserting UAA suppression mediated by yeast tRNASer

The number of loci that give rise to serine-inserting UAA suppressors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was determined by examining over 100 of the revertants that suppressed the two UAA markers his4-1176 and leu2-1: the his4-1176 marker is suppressed by serine-inserting but not by tyrosine- or leueine-inserting suppressors and the leu2-1 marker is suppressed by all UAA suppressors. The suppressors could be assigned to one or other of the four loci: SUP16 and SUP17. which were previously known to yield serine-inserting suppressors, and SUP19 and SUP22. The chromosomal map position of SUP19 suggested that it may be allelic to the previously reported suppressor SUP20, while the SUP22 suppressor has not been described. Representatives of all of the four suppressors were found to insert serine at the UAA site in iso-1-cytochrome c from suppressed cyc1-72 strains. The degree of suppression by the serine-inserting suppressors was SUP16 > SUP17 > SUP19 > SUP22. The efficiency of suppression of each of the four serine suppressors was increased by the chromosomal mutation sal and by the cytoplasmic determinant ψ⁺. Read-through of the synthetase gene of the RNA bacteriophage Qβ in a cell-free system was used to demonstrate that tRNA^Ser from SUP16, SUP17 and SUP19 strains can translate UAA codons. In contrast, tRNA^Ser or total tRNA from SUP22 strains had no suppressing activity. The results suggest that the three loci SUP16, SUP17 and SUP19 encode iso-accepting species of tRNA^Ser, and that the UAA suppression is mediated by mutationally altered tRNA molecules. The mechanism of SUP22 suppression remains unknown.