Unraveling the Complex Trait of Crop Yield With Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping in Brassica napus

Yield is the most important and complex trait for the genetic improvement of crops. Although much research into the genetic basis of yield and yield-associated traits has been reported, in each such experiment the genetic architecture and determinants of yield have remained ambiguous. One of the most intractable problems is the interaction between genes and the environment. We identified 85 quantitative trait loci (QTL) for seed yield along with 785 QTL for eight yield-associated traits, from 10 natural environments and two related populations of rapeseed. A trait-by-trait meta-analysis revealed 401 consensus QTL, of which 82.5% were clustered and integrated into 111 pleiotropic unique QTL by meta-analysis, 47 of which were relevant for seed yield. The complexity of the genetic architecture of yield was demonstrated, illustrating the pleiotropy, synthesis, variability, and plasticity of yield QTL. The idea of estimating indicator QTL for yield QTL and identifying potential candidate genes for yield provides an advance in methodology for complex traits.YIELD is the most important and complex trait in crops. It reflects the interaction of the environment with all growth and development processes that occur throughout the life cycle (Quarrie et al. 2006). Crop yield is directly and multiply determined by yield-component traits (such as seed weight and seed number). Yield-related traits (such as biomass, harvest index, plant architecture, adaptation, resistance to biotic and abiotic constraints) may also indirectly affect yield by affecting the yield-component traits or by other, unknown mechanisms. Increasing evidence suggests that “fine-mapped” quantitative trait loci (QTL) or genes identified as affecting crop yield involve diverse pathways, such as seed number (Ashikari et al. 2005; Tian et al. 2006b; Burstin et al. 2007; Xie et al. 2008; Xing et al. 2008; Xue et al. 2008), seed weight (Ishimaru 2003; Song et al. 2005; Shomura et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2008; Xie et al. 2006, 2008; Xing et al. 2008; Xue et al. 2008), flowering time (Cockram et al. 2007; Song et al. 2007; Xie et al. 2008; Xue et al. 2008), plant height (Salamini 2003; Ashikari et al. 2005; Xie et al. 2008; Xue et al. 2008), branching (Clark et al. 2006; Burstin et al. 2007; Xing et al. 2008), biomass yield (Quarrie et al. 2006; Burstin et al. 2007), resistance and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses (Khush 2001; Brown 2002; Yuan et al. 2002; Waller et al. 2005; Zhang 2007; Warrington et al. 2008), and root architecture (Hochholdinger et al. 2008).Many experiments have explored the genetic basis of yield and yield-associated traits (yield components and yield-related traits) in crops. Summaries of identified QTL have been published for wheat (MacCaferri et al. 2008), barley (Von Korff et al. 2008), rice, and maize (http://www.gramene.org/). The results show several common patterns. First, QTL for yield and yield-associated traits tend to be clustered in the genome, which suggests that the QTL of the yield-associated traits have pleiotropic effects on yield. Second, this kind of pleiotropy has not been well analyzed genetically. The QTL for yield (complicated factor), therefore, have not been associated with any yield-associated traits (relatively simple factors, such as plant height). Therefore, they are unlikely to predict accurately potential candidate genes for yield. Third, only a few loci (rarely >10) have been found for each of these traits. Thus, the genetic architecture of yield has remained ambiguous. Fourth, trials were carried out in a few environments and how the mode of expression of QTL for these complex traits might respond in different environments is unclear.In this study, the genetic architecture of crop yield was analyzed through the QTL mapping of seed yield and eight yield-associated traits in two related populations of rapeseed (Brassica napus) that were grown in 10 natural environments. The complexity of the genetic architecture of seed yield was demonstrated by QTL meta-analysis. The idea of estimating indicator QTL (QTL of yield-associated traits, which are defined as the potential genetic determinants of the colocalized QTL for yield) for yield QTL in conjunction with the identification of candidate genes is described.     

Does Gene Translocation Accelerate the Evolution of Laterally Transferred Genes?

Lateral gene transfer (LGT) and gene rearrangement are essential for shaping bacterial genomes during evolution. Separate attention has been focused on understanding the process of lateral gene transfer and the process of gene translocation. However, little is known about how gene translocation affects laterally transferred genes. Here we have examined gene translocations and lateral gene transfers in closely related genome pairs. The results reveal that translocated genes undergo elevated rates of evolution and gene translocation tends to take place preferentially in recently acquired genes. Translocated genes have a high probability to be truncated, suggesting that translocation followed by truncation/deletion might play an important role in the fast turnover of laterally transferred genes. Furthermore, more recently acquired genes have a higher proportion of genes on the leading strand, suggesting a strong strand bias of lateral gene transfer.GENE insertions and deletions, together with gene translocations play important roles in bacterial genome evolution (Garcia-Vallvé et al. 2000; Ochman and Jones 2000; Tillier and Collins 2000a; Fraser-Liggett 2005). Gene insertions and deletions, as the essential driving forces in influencing gene content (Kunin and Ouzounis 2003), have received a great deal of attention. Various methods have been employed to study gene insertions and deletions previously; for instance, there are studies of population dynamics (Nielsen and Townsend 2004), such as a birth-and-death model of evolution (Berg and Kurland 2002; Novozhilov et al. 2005), phylogeny-dependent studies including parsimony methods (Daubin et al. 2003a,b; Mirkin et al. 2003; Hao and Golding 2004), and maximum-likelihood methods (Hao and Golding 2006b, 2008b). It has been shown that recently laterally transferred genes have high evolutionary rates and high rates of gene turnover (Daubin et al. 2003b; Hao and Golding 2004, 2006b).Gene rearrangement has also been commonly studied as another important driving force that shapes bacterial genomes (for a review, see Rocha 2004). Gene order changes in genomes are history dependent; for instance, fewer gene rearrangements are expected among more closely related species. Gene order within genomes has therefore been used to reconstruct phylogeny (Sankoff et al. 2000; Tamames 2001; Rogozin et al. 2004; Belda et al. 2005). Previous studies have focused mainly on lateral gene transfer (LGT) and gene rearrangement individually, but little is known about any association between laterally transferred genes and gene rearrangements. The study of gene order of laterally acquired genes might shed some light on the understanding of the LGT process.In this study, we have examined gene translocations and lateral gene transfers in closely related genome pairs. It is shown that the proportion of translocated genes among recently acquired genes is always high, while the proportion of translocated genes is always low in ancient genes, suggesting that gene translocation tends to take place in recently transferred genes. The results also reveal that translocated genes have elevated rates of evolution compared with positionally conserved genes and gene truncation is more prevalent in translocated genes. These findings suggest that gene translocation might accelerate the gene turnover of recently transferred genes and/or that genes likely to undergo translocation are those genes more likely to be laterally transferred and dispensable for the genome. Furthermore, the proportion of recently acquired genes is higher on the leading strand, suggesting that laterally transferred genes are biased toward being on the leading strand. After lateral transfer, some genes could be translocated to the lagging strand and some translocated genes are likely to be eliminated during evolution.     

The Conserved miR-51 microRNA Family Is Redundantly Required for Embryonic Development and Pharynx Attachment in Caenorhabditis elegans

A major question about cytokinesis concerns the role of the septin proteins, which localize to the division site in all animal and fungal cells but are essential for cytokinesis only in some cell types. For example, in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, four septins localize to the division site, but deletion of the four genes produces only a modest delay in cell separation. To ask if the S. pombe septins function redundantly in cytokinesis, we conducted a synthetic-lethal screen in a septin-deficient strain and identified seven mutations. One mutation affects Cdc4, a myosin light chain that is an essential component of the cytokinetic actomyosin ring. Five others cause frequent cell lysis during cell separation and map to two loci. These mutations and their dosage suppressors define a signaling pathway (including Rho1 and a novel arrestin) for repairing cell-wall damage. The seventh mutation affects the poorly understood RNA-binding protein Scw1 and severely delays cell separation when combined either with a septin mutation or with a mutation affecting the septin-interacting, anillin-like protein Mid2, suggesting that Scw1 functions in a pathway parallel to that of the septins. Taken together, our results suggest that the S. pombe septins participate redundantly in one or more pathways that cooperate with the actomyosin ring during cytokinesis and that a septin defect causes septum defects that can be repaired effectively only when the cell-integrity pathway is intact.THE fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe provides an outstanding model system for studies of cytokinesis (McCollum and Gould 2001; Balasubramanian et al. 2004; Pollard and Wu 2010). As in most animal cells, successful cytokinesis in S. pombe requires an actomyosin ring (AMR). The AMR begins to assemble at the G₂/M transition and involves the type II myosin heavy chains Myo2 and Myp2 and the light chains Cdc4 and Rlc1 (Wu et al. 2003). Myo2 and Cdc4 are essential for cytokinesis under all known conditions, Rlc1 is important at all temperatures but essential only at low temperatures, and Myp2 is essential only under stress conditions. As the AMR constricts, a septum of cell wall is formed between the daughter cells. The primary septum is sandwiched by secondary septa and subsequently digested to allow cell separation (Humbel et al. 2001; Sipiczki 2007). Because of the internal turgor pressure of the cells, the proper assembly and structural integrity of the septal layers are essential for cell survival.Septum formation involves the β-glucan synthases Bgs1/Cps1/Drc1, Bgs3, and Bgs4 (Ishiguro et al. 1997; Le Goff et al. 1999; Liu et al. 1999, 2002; Martín et al. 2003; Cortés et al. 2005) and the α-glucan synthase Ags1/Mok1 (Hochstenbach et al. 1998; Katayama et al. 1999). These synthases are regulated by the Rho GTPases Rho1 and Rho2 and the protein kinase C isoforms Pck1 and Pck2 (Arellano et al. 1996, 1997, 1999; Nakano et al. 1997; Hirata et al. 1998; Calonge et al. 2000; Sayers et al. 2000; Ma et al. 2006; Barba et al. 2008; García et al. 2009b). The Rho GTPases themselves appear to be regulated by both GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) and guanine-nucleotide-exchange factors (GEFs) (Nakano et al. 2001; Calonge et al. 2003; Iwaki et al. 2003; Tajadura et al. 2004; Morrell-Falvey et al. 2005; Mutoh et al. 2005; García et al. 2006, 2009a,b). In addition, septum formation and AMR function appear to be interdependent. In the absence of a normal AMR, cells form aberrant septa and/or deposit septal materials at random locations, whereas a mutant defective in septum formation (bgs1) is also defective in AMR constriction (Gould and Simanis 1997; Le Goff et al. 1999; Liu et al. 1999, 2000). Both AMR constriction and septum formation also depend on the septation initiation network involving the small GTPase Spg1 (McCollum and Gould 2001; Krapp and Simanis 2008). Despite this considerable progress, many questions remain about the mechanisms and regulation of septum formation and its relationships to the function of the AMR.One major question concerns the role(s) of the septins. Proteins of this family are ubiquitous in fungal and animal cells and typically localize to the cell cortex, where they appear to serve as scaffolds and diffusion barriers for other proteins that participate in a wide variety of cellular processes (Longtine et al. 1996; Gladfelter et al. 2001; Hall et al. 2008; Caudron and Barral 2009). Despite the recent progress in elucidating the mechanisms of septin assembly (John et al. 2007; Sirajuddin et al. 2007; Bertin et al. 2008; McMurray and Thorner 2008), the details of septin function remain obscure. However, one prominent role of the septins and associated proteins is in cytokinesis. Septins concentrate at the division site in every cell type that has been examined, and in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Hartwell 1971; Longtine et al. 1996; Lippincott et al. 2001; Dobbelaere and Barral 2004) and at least some Drosophila (Neufeld and Rubin 1994; Adam et al. 2000) and mammalian (Kinoshita et al. 1997; Surka et al. 2002) cell types, the septins are essential for cytokinesis. In S. cerevisiae, the septins are required for formation of the AMR (Bi et al. 1998; Lippincott and Li 1998). However, this cannot be their only role, because the AMR itself is not essential for cytokinesis in this organism (Bi et al. 1998; Korinek et al. 2000; Schmidt et al. 2002). Moreover, there is no evidence that the septins are necessary for AMR formation or function in any other organism. A further complication is that in some cell types, including most Caenorhabditis elegans cells (Nguyen et al. 2000; Maddox et al. 2007) and some Drosophila cells (Adam et al. 2000; Field et al. 2008), the septins do not appear to be essential for cytokinesis even though they localize to the division site.S. pombe has seven septins, four of which (Spn1, Spn2, Spn3, and Spn4) are expressed in vegetative cells and localize to the division site shortly before AMR constriction and septum formation (Longtine et al. 1996; Berlin et al. 2003; Tasto et al. 2003; Wu et al. 2003; An et al. 2004; Petit et al. 2005; Pan et al. 2007; Onishi et al. 2010). Spn1 and Spn4 appear to be the core members of the septin complex (An et al. 2004; McMurray and Thorner 2008), and mutants lacking either of these proteins do not assemble the others at the division site. Assembly of a normal septin ring also depends on the anillin-like protein Mid2, which colocalizes with the septins (Berlin et al. 2003; Tasto et al. 2003). Surprisingly, mutants lacking the septins are viable and form seemingly complete septa with approximately normal timing. These mutants do, however, display a variable delay in separation of the daughter cells, suggesting that the septins play some role(s) in the proper completion of the septum or in subsequent processes necessary for cell separation (Longtine et al. 1996; An et al. 2004; Martín-Cuadrado et al. 2005).It is possible that the septins localize to the division site and yet are nonessential for division in some cell types because their role is redundant with that of some other protein(s) or pathway(s). To explore this possibility in S. pombe, we screened for mutations that were lethal in combination with a lack of septins. The results suggest that the septins cooperate with the AMR during cytokinesis and that, in the absence of septin function, the septum is not formed properly, so that an intact system for recognizing and repairing cell-wall damage becomes critical for cell survival.     

Polymorphic Genes of Major Effect: Consequences for Variation,Selection and Evolution in Arabidopsis thaliana

The importance of genes of major effect for evolutionary trajectories within and among natural populations has long been the subject of intense debate. For example, if allelic variation at a major-effect locus fundamentally alters the structure of quantitative trait variation, then fixation of a single locus can have rapid and profound effects on the rate or direction of subsequent evolutionary change. Using an Arabidopsis thaliana RIL mapping population, we compare G-matrix structure between lines possessing different alleles at ERECTA, a locus known to affect ecologically relevant variation in plant architecture. We find that the allele present at ERECTA significantly alters G-matrix structure—in particular the genetic correlations between branch number and flowering time traits—and may also modulate the strength of natural selection on these traits. Despite these differences, however, when we extend our analysis to determine how evolution might differ depending on the ERECTA allele, we find that predicted responses to selection are similar. To compare responses to selection between allele classes, we developed a resampling strategy that incorporates uncertainty in estimates of selection that can also be used for statistical comparisons of G matrices.THE structure of the genetic variation that underlies phenotypic traits has important consequences for understanding the evolution of quantitative traits (Fisher 1930; Lande 1979; Bulmer 1980; Kimura 1983; Orr 1998; Agrawal et al. 2001). Despite the infinitesimal model''s allure and theoretical tractability (see Orr and Coyne 1992; Orr 1998, 2005a,b for reviews of its influence), evidence has accumulated from several sources (artificial selection experiments, experimental evolution, and QTL mapping) to suggest that genes of major effect often contribute to quantitative traits. Thus, the frequency and role of genes of major effect in evolutionary quantitative genetics have been a subject of intense debate and investigation for close to 80 years (Fisher 1930; Kimura 1983; Orr 1998, 2005a,b). Beyond the conceptual implications, the prevalence of major-effect loci also affects our ability to determine the genetic basis of adaptations and species differences (e.g., Bradshaw et al. 1995, 1998).Although the existence of genes of major effect is no longer in doubt, we still lack basic empirical data on how segregating variation at such genes affects key components of evolutionary process (but see Carrière and Roff 1995). In other words, How does polymorphism at genes of major effect alter patterns of genetic variation and covariation, natural selection, and the likely response to selection? The lack of data stems, in part, from the methods used to detect genes of major effect: experimental evolution (e.g., Bull et al. 1997; Zeyl 2005) and QTL analysis (see Erickson et al. 2004 for a review) often detect such genes retrospectively after they have become fixed in experimental populations or the species pairs used to generate the mapping population. The consequences of polymorphism at these genes on patterns of variation, covariation, selection, and the response to selection—which can be transient (Agrawal et al. 2001)—are thus often unobserved.A partial exception to the absence of data on the effects of major genes comes from artificial selection experiments, in which a substantial evolutionary response to selection in the phenotype after a plateau is often interpreted as evidence for the fixation of a major-effect locus (Frankham et al. 1968; Yoo 1980a,b; Frankham 1980; Shrimpton and Robertson 1988a,b; Caballero et al. 1991; Keightley 1998; see Mackay 1990 and Hill and Caballero 1992 for reviews). However, many of these experiments report only data on the selected phenotype (e.g., bristle number) or, alternatively, the selected phenotype and some measure of fitness (e.g., Frankham et al. 1968, Yoo 1980b; Caballero et al. 1991; Mackay et al. 1994; Fry et al. 1995; Nuzhdin et al. 1995; Zur Lage et al. 1997), making it difficult to infer how a mutation will affect variation, covariation, selection, and evolutionary responses for a suite of traits that might affect fitness themselves. One approach is to document how variation at individual genes of major effect affects the genetic variance–covariance matrix (“G matrix”; Lande 1979), which represents the additive genetic variance and covariance between traits.Although direct evidence for variation at major-effect genes altering patterns of genetic variation, covariation, and selection is rare, there is abundant evidence for the genetic mechanisms that could produce these dynamics. A gene of major effect could have these consequences due to any of at least three genetic mechanisms: (1) pleiotropy, where a gene of major effect influences several traits, including potentially fitness, simultaneously, (2) physical linkage or linkage disequilibrium (LD), in which a gene of major effect is either physically linked or in LD with other genes that influence other traits under selection, and (3) epistasis, in which the allele present at a major-effect gene alters the phenotypic effect of other loci and potentially phenotypes under selection. Evidence for these three evolutionary genetic mechanisms leading to changes in suites of traits comes from a variety of sources, including mutation accumulation experiments (Clark et al. 1995; Fernandez and Lopez-Fanjul 1996), mutation induction experiments (Keightley and Ohnishi 1998), artificial selection experiments (Long et al. 1995), and transposable element insertions (Rollmann et al. 2006). For pleiotropy in particular, major-effect genes that have consequences on several phenotypic traits are well known from the domestication and livestock breeding literature [e.g., myostatin mutations in Belgian blue cattle and whippets (Arthur 1995; Grobet et al. 1997; Mosher et al. 2007), halothane genes in pigs (Christian and Rothschild 1991; Fujii et al. 1991), and Booroola and Inverdale genes in sheep (Amer et al. 1999; Visscher et al. 2000)]. While these data suggest that variation at major-effect genes could—and probably does—influence variation, covariation, and selection on quantitative traits, data on the magnitude of these consequences remain lacking.Recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations are a promising tool for investigating the influence of major-effect loci. During advancement of the lines from F₂''s to RILs, alternate alleles at major-effect genes (and most of the rest of the genome) will be made homozygous, simplifying comparisons among genotypic classes. Because of the high homozygosity, individuals within RILs are nearly genetically identical, facilitating phenotyping of many genotypes under a range of environments. In addition, because of recombination, alternative alleles are randomized across genetic backgrounds—facilitating robust comparisons between sets of lines differing at a major-effect locus.Here we investigate how polymorphism at an artificially induced mutation, the erecta locus in Arabidopsis thaliana, affects the magnitude of these important evolutionary genetic parameters under ecologically realistic field conditions. We use the Landsberg erecta (Ler) × Columbia (Col) RIL population of A. thaliana to examine how variation at a gene of major effect influences genetic variation, covariation, and selection on quantitative traits in a field setting. The Ler × Col RIL population is particularly suitable, because it segregates for an artificially induced mutation at the erecta locus, which has been shown to influence a wide variety of plant traits. The Ler × Col population thus allows a powerful test of the effects of segregating variation at a gene—chosen a priori—with numerous pleiotropic effects. The ERECTA gene is a leucine-rich receptor-like kinase (LRR-RLK) (Torii et al. 1996) and has been shown to affect plant growth rates (El-Lithy et al. 2004), stomatal patterning and transpiration efficiency (Masle et al. 2005; Shpak et al. 2005), bacterial pathogen resistance (Godiard et al. 2003), inflorescence and floral organ size and shape (Douglas et al. 2002; Shpak et al. 2003, 2004), and leaf polarity (Xu et al. 2003; Qi et al. 2004).Specifically, we sought to answer the following questions: (1) Is variation at erecta significantly associated with changes to the G matrix? (2) Is variation at erecta associated with changes in natural selection on genetically variable traits? And (3) is variation at erecta associated with significantly different projected evolutionary responses to selection?     

Inferring Bacterial Genome Flux While Considering Truncated Genes

Bacterial gene content variation during the course of evolution has been widely acknowledged and its pattern has been actively modeled in recent years. Gene truncation or gene pseudogenization also plays an important role in shaping bacterial genome content. Truncated genes could also arise from small-scale lateral gene transfer events. Unfortunately, the information of truncated genes has not been considered in any existing mathematical models on gene content variation. In this study, we developed a model to incorporate truncated genes. Maximum-likelihood estimates (MLEs) of the new model reveal fast rates of gene insertions/deletions on recent branches, suggesting a fast turnover of many recently transferred genes. The estimates also suggest that many truncated genes are in the process of being eliminated from the genome. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the ignorance of truncated genes in the estimation does not lead to a systematic bias but rather has a more complicated effect. Analysis using the new model not only provides more accurate estimates on gene gains/losses (or insertions/deletions), but also reduces any concern of a systematic bias from applying simplified models to bacterial genome evolution. Although not a primary purpose, the model incorporating truncated genes could be potentially used for phylogeny reconstruction using gene family content.GENE content variation as a key feature of bacterial genome evolution has been well recognized (Garcia-Vallvé et al. 2000; Ochman and Jones 2000; Snel et al. 2002; Welch et al. 2002; Kunin and Ouzounis 2003; Fraser-Liggett 2005; Tettelin et al. 2005) and gained increasing attention in recent years. Various methods have been employed to study the variation of gene content in the form of gene insertions/deletions (or gene gains/losses); there are studies of population dynamics (Nielsen and Townsend 2004), birth-and-death evolutionary models (Berg and Kurland 2002; Novozhilov et al. 2005), phylogeny-dependent studies including parsimony methods (Mirkin et al. 2003; Daubin et al. 2003a,b; Hao and Golding 2004), and maximum-likelihood methods (Hao and Golding 2006, 2008b; Cohen et al. 2008; Cohen and Pupko 2010; Spencer and Sangaralingam 2009). The pattern of gene presence/absence also contains phylogenetic signals (Fitz-Gibbon and House 1999; Snel et al. 1999; Tekaia et al. 1999) and has been used for phylogenetic reconstruction (Dutilh et al. 2004; Gu and Zhang 2004; Huson and Steel 2004; Zhang and Gu 2004; Spencer et al. 2007a,b). All these studies make use of the binary information of gene presence or absence and neglect the existence of gene segments or truncated genes.Bacterial genomes are known to harbor pseudogenes. An intracellular species Mycobacterium leprae is an extreme case for both the proportion and the number of pseudogenes: estimated as 40% of the 3.2-Mb genome and 1116 genes (Cole et al. 2001). In free-living bacteria, pseudogenes can make up to 8% of the annotated genes in the genome (Lerat and Ochman 2004). Many pseudogenes result from the degradation of native functional genes (Cole et al. 2001; Mira et al. 2001). Pseudogenes could also result from the degradation of transferred genes and might even be acquired directly via lateral gene transfer. For instance, in plant mitochondrial genomes, which have an α-proteobacterial ancestry, most, if not all, of the laterally transferred genes are pseudogenes (Richardson and Palmer 2007). Furthermore, evidence has been documented that gene transfer could take place at the subgenic level in a wide range of organisms, e.g., among bacteria (Miller et al. 2005; Choi and Kim 2007; Chan et al. 2009), between ancient duplicates in archaea (Archibald and Roger 2002), between different organelles (Hao and Palmer 2009; Hao 2010), and between eukaryotes (Keeling and Palmer 2001). A large fraction of pseudogenes have been shown to arise from failed lateral transfer events (Liu et al. 2004) and most of them are transient in bacterial genomes (Lerat and Ochman 2005). Zhaxybayeva et al. (2007) reported that genomes with truncated homologs might erroneously lead to false inferences of “gene gain” rather than multiple instances of “gene loss.” This raises the question of how a false diagnosis of gene absence affects the estimation of insertion/deletion rates. Recently, we showed that the effect of a false diagnosis of gene absence on estimation of insertion/deletion rates is not systematic, but rather more complicated (Hao and Golding 2008a). To further address the problem, a study incorporating the information of truncated genes is highly desirable. This will not only yield more accurate estimates of the rates of gene insertions/deletions, but also provide a quantitative view of the effect of truncated genes on rate estimation, which has been understudied in bacterial genome evolution.In this study, we developed a model that considers the information of truncated genes and makes use of a parameter-rich time-reversible rate matrix. Rate variation among genes is allowed in the model by incorporating a discrete Γ-distribution. We also allow rates to vary on different parts of the phylogeny (external branches vs. internal branches). Consistent with previous studies, the rates of gene insertions/deletions are comparable to or larger than the rates of nucleotide substitution and the rates of gene insertions/deletions are further inflated in closely related groups and on external branches, suggesting high rates of gene turnover of recently transferred genes. The results from the new model also suggest that many recently truncated genes are in the process of being rapidly deleted from the genome. Some other interesting estimates in the model are also presented and discussed. One implication of the study, though not primary, is that the state of truncated genes could serve as an additional phylogenetic character for phylogenetic reconstruction using gene family content.     

Association Mapping of Quantitative Disease Resistance in a Natural Population of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.)

Genetic resistance to disease incited by necrotrophic pathogens is not well understood in plants. Whereas resistance is often quantitative, there is limited information on the genes that underpin quantitative variation in disease resistance. We used a population genomic approach to identify genes in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) that are associated with resistance to pitch canker, a disease incited by the necrotrophic pathogen Fusarium circinatum. A set of 498 largely unrelated, clonally propagated genotypes were inoculated with F. circinatum microconidia and lesion length, a measure of disease resistance, data were collected 4, 8, and 12 weeks after inoculation. Best linear unbiased prediction was used to adjust for imbalance in number of observations and to identify highly susceptible and highly resistant genotypes (“tails”). The tails were reinoculated to validate the results of the full population screen. Significant associations were detected in 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (out of 3938 tested). As hypothesized for genes involved in quantitative resistance, the 10 SNPs had small effects and proposed roles in basal resistance, direct defense, and signal transduction. We also discovered associated genes with unknown function, which would have remained undetected in a candidate gene approach constrained by annotation for disease resistance or stress response.GENETIC interactions between host and pathogen populations result in abundant natural variation in the genes involved in host disease resistance. Most of the studies leading to identification and cloning of disease resistance genes are focused on major gene disease resistance (Johal and Briggs 1992; Dangl and Jones 2001; Jones and Dangl 2006). In cases where resistance is associated with single genes, genetic effects are large in magnitude and detection is straightforward. In contrast, quantitative disease resistance is typically conditioned by many genes with relatively small effects. Quantitative resistance is generally considered to be more durable but also more difficult to investigate relative to major gene resistance, since the effects of individual genes are small and phenotyping experiments must be performed with high levels of precision. As a consequence, the genes and mechanisms of quantitative disease resistance are poorly understood, in part due to the smaller effect of individual genes on the resistance phenotype. Interactions between plants and necrotrophic pathogens often exhibit quantitative resistance (Balint-Kurti et al. 2008; Poland et al. 2009).Pitch canker disease of loblolly pine and other pine species is incited by the necrotrophic pathogen Fusarium circinatum and is manifest as resinous lesions in stems and branches (Dwinell et al. 1985; Enebak and Stanosz 2003; Carey et al. 2005; Sakamoto and Gordon 2006). There is evidence for heritable resistance to pitch canker in loblolly pine (Kayihan et al. 2005) as well as other pine species (Hodge and Dvorak 2000, 2007). In this article we report the first population-wide phenotypic screen of a clonally propagated population of loblolly pine for association testing (Eckert et al. 2010). Clonal propagation of this population enabled precise phenotyping, which was required to obtain the resolution needed to identify candidates for quantitative disease resistance loci.Pine species in general exhibit high levels of nucleotide variation and low linkage disequilibrium (LD) (Brown et al. 2004). An association genetic approach relies on the premise that historical, unrecorded recombination events over many generations have reduced LD between markers and quantitative trait loci such that only those marker-trait pairs that are tightly linked remain detectable; this may enable “fine mapping” to identify genes underlying quantitative variation (Flint-Garcia et al. 2003; Neale and Savolainen 2004). Association-based approaches have been used to identify candidate genes underlying traits in plants (Zhao et al. 2007; Stich et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2008; Yahiaoui et al. 2008; Inostroza et al. 2009; Stracke et al. 2009), based in part on applications in humans (D''alfonso et al. 2002; McGuffin et al. 2003; Easton et al. 2007; Lee et al. 2007), livestock (Martinez et al. 2006; Charlier et al. 2008; Goddard and Hayes 2009), and Drosophila (Kennington et al. 2007; Norry et al. 2007; Jiang et al. 2009). Recent association studies in tree species have evaluated single candidate genes or a modest number of candidate genes for association (Thumma et al. 2005; Gonzalez-Martinez et al. 2007, 2008; Ingvarsson et al. 2008; Eckert et al. 2009a). Association mapping has been used to identify disease resistance genes in several crop species including sugarcane, maize, barley, and potato (Flint-Garcia et al. 2005; Wei et al. 2006; Yu and Buckler 2006; Malosetti et al. 2007; Stich et al. 2008; Inostroza et al. 2009; Murray et al. 2009). The population analyzed in this study was genotyped at 3938 SNP loci that were selected without regard to the functional annotation of ESTs from which they were derived. Thus, we reasoned that the status of any particular marker as a candidate disease resistance gene would be determined by association testing, as opposed to previous studies in which markers were typically evaluated on the basis of their presumed roles in disease resistance in other species.Several different, but not mutually exclusive hypotheses have been proposed regarding the genetic origins of quantitative resistance (Poland et al. 2009), providing a useful framework for understanding evolution of resistance to necrotrophic pathogens. These six hypotheses proposed by Poland et al. (2009) predict that quantitative disease resistance is conditioned by: (1) genes regulating morphological and developmental phenotypes; (2) mutations in genes involved in basal defense causing small, incremental levels of resistance; (3) components of chemical warfare, through the action of genes producing antibiotic or antifungal compounds; (4) genes involved in defense signal transduction pathways; (5) weak forms of defeated R genes; and/or (6) genes not yet known to be involved in disease resistance.In this study, our main objective was to evaluate the genetic architecture of pitch canker disease resistance: to quantify the extent to which genes contribute to variation in the disease phenotype, to evaluate the hypothesis that disease resistance was quantitative, and to identify candidate genes for resistance as well as quantify their magnitude of effect. In the process of identifying candidate genes for resistance we were also able to evaluate support for hypotheses recently put forth by Poland et al. (2009) regarding the biological roles and origins of quantitative resistance genes.     

Genetic Modifiers of dFMR1 Encode RNA Granule Components in Drosophila

Mechanisms of neuronal mRNA localization and translation are of considerable biological interest. Spatially regulated mRNA translation contributes to cell-fate decisions and axon guidance during development, as well as to long-term synaptic plasticity in adulthood. The Fragile-X Mental Retardation protein (FMRP/dFMR1) is one of the best-studied neuronal translational control molecules and here we describe the identification and early characterization of proteins likely to function in the dFMR1 pathway. Induction of the dFMR1 in sevenless-expressing cells of the Drosophila eye causes a disorganized (rough) eye through a mechanism that requires residues necessary for dFMR1/FMRP''s translational repressor function. Several mutations in dco, orb2, pAbp, rm62, and smD3 genes dominantly suppress the sev-dfmr1 rough-eye phenotype, suggesting that they are required for dFMR1-mediated processes. The encoded proteins localize to dFMR1-containing neuronal mRNPs in neurites of cultured neurons, and/or have an effect on dendritic branching predicted for bona fide neuronal translational repressors. Genetic mosaic analyses indicate that dco, orb2, rm62, smD3, and dfmr1 are dispensable for translational repression of hid, a microRNA target gene, known to be repressed in wing discs by the bantam miRNA. Thus, the encoded proteins may function as miRNA- and/or mRNA-specific translational regulators in vivo.THE subcellular localization and regulated translation of stored mRNAs contributes to cellular asymmetry and subcellular specialization (Lecuyer et al. 2007; Martin and Ephrussi 2009). In mature neurons, local protein synthesis at active synapses may contribute to synapse-specific plasticity that underlies persistent forms of memory (Casadio et al. 1999; Ashraf et al. 2006; Sutton and Schuman 2006; Richter and Klann 2009). During this process, synaptic activity causes local translation of mRNAs normally stored in translationally repressed synaptic mRNPs (Sutton and Schuman 2006; Richter and Klann 2009). While specific neuronal translational repressors and microRNAs have been implicated in this process, their involvement in local translation that underlies memory, as well as the underlying mechanisms, are generally not well understood (Schratt et al. 2006; Keleman et al. 2007; Kwak et al. 2008; Li et al. 2008; Richter and Klann 2009). Furthermore, it remains possible that there are neuron-specific, mRNA-specific, and stimulus-pattern specific pathways for neuronal translational control (Raab-Graham et al. 2006; Giorgi et al. 2007).The Fragile-X Mental Retardation protein (FMRP) is among the best studied of neuronal translational repressors, in part due to its association with human neurodevelopmental disease (Pieretti et al. 1991; Mazroui et al. 2002; Gao 2008). Consistent with function in synaptic translation required for memory formation, mutations in FMRP are associated with increased synaptic translation, enhanced LTD, increased synapse growth, and also with enhanced long-term memory (Zhang et al. 2001; Huber et al. 2002; Bolduc et al. 2008; Dictenberg et al. 2008).FMRP co-immunoprecipitates with components of the RNAi and miRNA machinery and appears to be required for aspects of miRNA function in neurons (Caudy et al. 2002; Ishizuka et al. 2002; Jin et al. 2004b; Gao 2008). In addition, FMRP associates with neuronal polyribosomes as well as with Staufen-containing ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) granules easily observed in neurites of cultured neurons (Feng et al. 1997; Krichevsky and Kosik 2001; Mazroui et al. 2002; Kanai et al. 2004; Barbee et al. 2006; Bramham and Wells 2007; Bassell and Warren 2008; Dictenberg et al. 2008). FMRP-containing neuronal mRNPs contain not only several ubiquitous translational control molecules, but also CaMKII and Arc mRNAs, whose translation is locally controlled at synapses (Rook et al. 2000; Krichevsky and Kosik 2001; Kanai et al. 2004; Barbee et al. 2006). Thus, FMRP-containing RNA particles are probably translationally repressed and transported along microtubules from the neuronal cell body to synaptic sites in dendrites where local synaptic activity can induce their translation (Kiebler and Bassell 2006; Dictenberg et al. 2008).The functions of FMRP/dFMR1 in mRNA localization as well as miRNA-dependent and independent forms of translational control is likely to require several other regulatory proteins. To identify such proteins, we used a previously designed and validated genetic screen (Wan et al. 2000; Jin et al. 2004a; Zarnescu et al. 2005). The overexpression of dFMR1 in the fly eye causes a “rough-eye” phenotype through a mechanism that requires (a) key residues in dFMR1 that mediate translational repression in vitro; (b) Ago1, a known components of the miRNA pathway; and (c) a DEAD-box helicase called Me31B, which is a highly conserved protein from yeast (Dhh1p) to humans (Rck54/DDX6) functioning in translational repression and present on neuritic mRNPs (Wan et al. 2000; Laggerbauer et al. 2001; Jin et al. 2004a; Coller and Parker 2005; Barbee et al. 2006; Chu and Rana 2006). To identify other Me31B-like translational repressors and neuronal granule components, we screened mutations in 43 candidate proteins for their ability to modify dFMR1 induced rough-eye phenotype. We describe the results of this genetic screen and follow up experiments to address the potential cellular functions of five genes identified as suppressors of sev-dfmr1.