Rice Fertilization-Independent Endosperm1 Regulates Seed Size under Heat Stress by Controlling Early Endosperm Development

Although heat stress reduces seed size in rice (Oryza sativa), little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed reduction in seed size and yield. To elucidate the mechanistic basis of heat sensitivity and reduced seed size, we imposed a moderate (34°C) and a high (42°C) heat stress treatment on developing rice seeds during the postfertilization stage. Both stress treatments reduced the final seed size. At a cellular level, the moderate heat stress resulted in precocious endosperm cellularization, whereas severe heat-stressed seeds failed to cellularize. Initiation of endosperm cellularization is a critical developmental transition required for normal seed development, and it is controlled by Polycomb Repressive Complex2 (PRC2) in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). We observed that a member of PRC2 called Fertilization-Independent Endosperm1 (OsFIE1) was sensitive to temperature changes, and its expression was negatively correlated with the duration of the syncytial stage during heat stress. Seeds from plants overexpressing OsFIE1 had reduced seed size and exhibited precocious cellularization. The DNA methylation status and a repressive histone modification of OsFIE1 were observed to be temperature sensitive. Our data suggested that the thermal sensitivity of seed enlargement could partly be caused by altered epigenetic regulation of endosperm development during the transition from the syncytial to the cellularized state.World rice (Oryza sativa) production needs to increase significantly to sustain an increasing population. However, higher average temperatures caused by global warming are predicted to decrease rice yields in many parts of the world, especially Asia. In one study, rice yield was estimated to decrease by 10% for every 1°C rise in minimum growing season temperature (Peng et al., 2004). Comparable yield losses with rising temperatures have been reported for two other major cereal crops: wheat (Triticum spp.) and maize (Zea mays; Wardlaw, 1989; Lobell et al., 2011). Rice, wheat, and maize together are the main sources of calories for most countries (Reynolds et al., 2011). Therefore, it is critical that we understand the agronomic, biological, and economic consequences of high temperature on crop yields.Heat stress during seed development decreases the seed size in many cereals (Nagato and Ebata, 1960; Hunter et al., 1977; Savin et al., 1996) and when coupled with seed number per unit area, determines seed yield. Seed size is largely contributed by the endosperm, a triploid tissue derived from fusion of the sperm cell with the diploid central cell during the double fertilization event. Endosperm development progresses in distinct developmental stages. After fertilization, the endosperm enters the syncytial stage, where triploid nuclei undergo rapid mitotic divisions without cytokinesis, followed by cellularization and finally, differentiation and maturation (Olsen, 2001; Sabelli and Larkins, 2009b). Duration of the syncytial stage and rate of mitotic divisions during this stage are important determinants of seed size (Mizutani et al., 2010). Successful transition from the syncytial to the cellularization stage is critical for normal seed development (Brown et al., 1996).In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the processes controlling early endosperm development and the transition from syncytial to cellularized stage are associated with the Polycomb Repressive Complex2 (PRC2) genes, which includes Fertilization-Independent Endosperm (FIE), Fertilization-Independent Seed2 (FIS2), Medea (MEA), and Multicopy Suppressor of IRA1 (Guitton and Berger, 2005; Baroux et al., 2006; Huh et al., 2007). The PRC2 complex is involved in gene silencing mediated by a repressive histone modification (H3K27me3; Köhler and Villar, 2008). Loss of function of several of these PRC2 genes results in abnormal endosperm development. A notable phenotype observed in Arabidopsis FIS mutants is endosperm overproliferation and seed failure (Kiyosue et al., 1999; Sørensen et al., 2002). Several endosperm-specific MADS-box genes (such as Pheres1, AGAMOUS-LIKE36 (AGL36), and AGL62 among others) are misregulated in seeds that are deficient in PRC2-encoding genes (Kang et al., 2008; Köhler and Villar, 2008; Walia et al., 2009). A loss-of-function mutation in Arabidopsis AGL62 resulted in precocious cellularization and smaller seeds (Kang et al., 2008). Although the function of the PRC2 complex is conserved in cereals such as rice and maize, orthologs of FIS2 and MEA have not been reported (Spillane et al., 2007; Luo et al., 2009). Orthologs of the Arabidopsis FIE gene have been reported in both rice (OsFIE1 and OsFIE2) and maize (ZmFIE1 and ZmFIE2; Springer et al., 2002; Danilevskaya et al., 2003; Luo et al., 2009). OsFIE1 is expressed only in the endosperm, whereas OsFIE2 is expressed in all tissues tested (Luo et al., 2009; Nallamilli et al., 2013). OsFIE1 is an imprinted gene, and its expression is regulated by DNA and H3K9me2 methylation (Luo et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2012). OsFIE2 has a critical role in normal endosperm development and grain filling (Nallamilli et al., 2013).Our understanding of the epigenetic regulation of rice seed development has improved significantly (Zemach et al., 2010; Luo et al., 2011; Rodrigues et al., 2013). However, how the epigenetic regulation during seed development is altered during environmental perturbations is not well characterized. Most research efforts in the past have focused on the grain-filling stage (when storage proteins and starch accumulate) under stressful conditions (Yamakawa et al., 2007). However, it is not known if and how an environmental stress that specifically occurs during early seed development impacts seed size in rice. Here, we present evidence that early rice seed development is highly sensitive to heat stress and results in seed size reduction. We suggest a molecular mechanism that involves the rice PRC2 gene OsFIE1 as a potential component involved in regulating seed enlargement under heat stress.     

The Changing Fate of a Secretory Glycoprotein in Developing Maize Endosperm

Zeins are the major storage proteins in maize (Zea mays) endosperm, and their accumulation in zein bodies derived from the endoplasmic reticulum is well characterized. In contrast, relatively little is known about post-Golgi compartments or the trafficking of vacuolar proteins in maize endosperm, specifically the presence of globulins in structures resembling protein storage vacuoles that appear in early to mid-stage seed development. We investigated this pathway by expressing and analyzing a recombinant reporter glycoprotein during endosperm maturation, using a combination of microscopy and sensitive glycopeptide analysis. Specific N-glycan acceptor sites on the protein were followed through the stages of grain development, revealing a shift from predominantly paucimannosidic vacuolar glycoforms to predominantly trimmed glycan structures lacking fucose. This was accompanied by a change in the main subcellular localization of the protein from large protein storage vacuole-like post-Golgi organelles to the endoplasmic reticulum and zein bodies. The endogenous storage proteins corn α-globulin and corn legumin-1 showed a similar spatiotemporal profile both in transgenic plants expressing the reporter glycoprotein and in wild-type plants. This indicates that the shift of the intracellular trafficking route, as observed with our reporter glycoprotein, may be a common strategy in maize seed development.Storage proteins in cereal seeds accumulate in different compartments of the endosperm cell, and their abundance and distribution varies according to the species. While in most cereals prolamins are the more abundant class of storage proteins, small-grain species (e.g. wheat [Triticum aestivum], oat [Avena sativa], and barley [Hordeum vulgare]) may contain variable proportions of both prolamins and globulins, and these are delivered to the protein storage vacuole (PSV) via Golgi-dependent and Golgi-independent pathways (Wettstein, 1980; Levanony et al., 1992; Herman and Schmidt, 2004; Takahashi et al., 2005; Cameron-Mills and von Tosi et al., 2009). In rice (Oryza sativa), where globulins and prolamins accumulate in distinct storage compartments, most globulins (mainly glutelins) accumulate in PSVs whereas prolamins aggregate into dense protein bodies within the rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and remain in ER-derived organelles (Okita and Rogers, 1996). Maize (Zea mays) stores mainly prolamins (zeins) comprised in three zein subfamilies (α, γ, and δ) that form ER-derived zein bodies. Mature zein bodies consist of a central core of α and δ zeins, while γ zeins are mainly found in the periphery (Lending and Larkins, 1989). Small amounts of globulins also accumulate in maize endosperm, i.e. corn α-globulin (CAG) and corn legumin-1 (CL-1; Woo et al., 2001). Unlike legumin homologs in other plant species including cereals, CL-1 lacks the canonical asparaginyl endopeptidase cleavage sequence (Woo et al., 2001), so it is not cleaved into α and β chains (Yamagata et al., 2003). CAG has been observed in small, PSV-like compartments within the maize endosperm cell (Woo et al., 2001) and a similar fate has been predicted for CL-1 (Yamagata et al., 2003). The identification and localization of globulins in maize indicates the presence of storage vacuoles in maize endosperm, but it does not address the question whether the size and number of these organelles is significant in maize, whether they change morphologically during seed maturation, and how proteins reach this destination.Proteins may reach the PSV by different routes, and in some species storage protein trafficking appears to undergo changes during seed development. For example, in the context of 2S and 11S storage protein trafficking in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) and castor bean (Ricinus communis) it has been proposed that seed developmental stages may be important in determining the transport routes to the PSV (Vitale and Hinz, 2005). A seed-development-mediated change in the trafficking route of wheat prolamins has been suggested earlier as well (Shy et al., 2001; Tosi et al., 2009). One approach to study such change in trafficking routes along seed maturation is to scrutinize the glycosylation pattern of proteins destined to the PSV, taking advantage of the fact that the intracellular trafficking route of a glycoprotein determines its final N-glycan structures (Lerouge et al., 1998).The first stage of N-glycosylation (which takes place in the ER) involves the cotranslational addition of a precursor oligosaccharide (Glc₃Man₉GlcNAc₂) that is modified by various glycosidases and glycosyltransferases to form the final glycan structure as the protein migrates through the endomembrane system (Lis and Sharon, 1993; Lerouge et al., 1998). ER-resident glycoproteins contain high-Man-type N-glycans whereas proteins passing though the Golgi apparatus contain complex-type N-glycans that include α(1-3)-Fuc and/or β(1-2)-Xyl residues (Lerouge et al., 1998). While secreted glycoproteins contain terminal GlcNAc residues in addition to the core Fuc and Xyl, these terminal residues are trimmed off by enzymes either en route to the vacuole or within the vacuole (Lerouge et al., 1998). Thus the structure of N-glycans is a useful indicator for the intracellular pathway of a protein (Vitale and Hinz, 2005).Unfortunately, most seed storage proteins, particularly those in cereals, are not glycosylated. However, information on N-glycan structures can be obtained from recombinant glycoproteins. For example, a KDEL-tagged antibody, which was located primarily in ER-derived zein bodies, was predominantly made up of molecules with single GlcNAc residues lacking Fuc (Rademacher et al., 2008). In contrast, recombinant human lactoferrin isolated from maize seeds was reported to contain pauci-Man-type N-glycans with β(1,2)-Xyl and α(1,3)-linked core Fuc (Samyn-Petit et al., 2001). Interestingly, this glycan pattern suggests a vacuolar location of this recombinant protein, and provides a second strong evidence for the presence of PSVs in maize, although the actual subcellular localization of lactoferrin in maize endosperm cells has not been confirmed.In previous studies we have shown that recombinant glycoproteins can help to clarify questions about the intracellular trafficking of proteins in cereal endosperm, and we found that a recombinant fungal phytase, although secreted from leaf cells, is mainly localized in the PSVs of wheat and rice endosperm (Arcalis et al., 2004; Drakakaki et al., 2006). In this study we used recombinant phytase to facilitate the visualization and characterization of the PSVs in maize, and we followed the intracellular fate of recombinant phytase in developing endosperm using a combination of microscopy and N-glycan analysis, revealing that the trafficking of the protein does indeed change as the seed matures. This behavior is mirrored by the two endogenous (aglycosylated) globulins, CAG and CL-1, indicating that the diversion of storage proteins may be a common strategy in seed development.     

Distinct Cell Wall Architectures in Seed Endosperms in Representatives of the Brassicaceae and Solanaceae

In some species, a crucial role has been demonstrated for the seed endosperm during germination. The endosperm has been shown to integrate environmental cues with hormonal networks that underpin dormancy and seed germination, a process that involves the action of cell wall remodeling enzymes (CWREs). Here, we examine the cell wall architectures of the endosperms of two related Brassicaceae, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and the close relative Lepidium (Lepidium sativum), and that of the Solanaceous species, tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). The Brassicaceae species have a similar cell wall architecture that is rich in pectic homogalacturonan, arabinan, and xyloglucan. Distinctive features of the tobacco endosperm that are absent in the Brassicaceae representatives are major tissue asymmetries in cell wall structural components that reflect the future site of radicle emergence and abundant heteromannan. Cell wall architecture of the micropylar endosperm of tobacco seeds has structural components similar to those seen in Arabidopsis and Lepidium endosperms. In situ and biomechanical analyses were used to study changes in endosperms during seed germination and suggest a role for mannan degradation in tobacco. In the case of the Brassicaceae representatives, the structurally homogeneous cell walls of the endosperm can be acted on by spatially regulated CWRE expression. Genetic manipulations of cell wall components present in the Arabidopsis seed endosperm demonstrate the impact of cell wall architectural changes on germination kinetics.Angiosperms are a diverse group of seed plants that reproduce by a double fertilization event; the first produces a zygote and the second a specialized nutritive tissue known as the endosperm. The endosperm and the maternally derived testa (seed coat) evolved to protect the embryo until conditions are favorable for germination and establishment of the next generation (Rajjou and Debeaujon, 2008; Linkies et al., 2010). Endosperm from cereals/grasses, such as maize (Zea mays), barley (Hordeum vulgare), and wheat (Triticum aestivum), is vital for human and animal nutrition and is therefore of global economic importance (Olsen, 2007). In many seeds, such as some representatives of the Brassicaceae, the endosperm is entirely absent at seed maturity, the storage reserves having been absorbed by the cotyledons during embryo development. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and Lepidium (Lepidium sativum) are notable exceptions in that they have retained a thin layer of endosperm tissue in the mature seed (Müller et al., 2006; Linkies and Leubner-Metzger, 2012).Some seeds exhibit primary dormancy at maturity that has been induced by abscisic acid (ABA; Hilhorst, 1995; Kucera et al., 2005). In its simplest sense, dormancy can be thought of as a block to germination of an intact viable seed under favorable conditions (Hilhorst, 1995; Bewley, 1997). A more sophisticated definition was proposed by Baskin and Baskin (2004), who state that a dormant seed does not have the capacity to germinate in a specified period of time under any combination of normal physical environmental factors that are otherwise favorable for its germination. Seed dormancy can be imposed by the embryo, the seed coat (including the endosperm), or a combination of both depending on the plant species (Bewley, 1997).The endosperm has been shown to be an important regulator of germination potential in several systems, including tomato (Solanum lycopersicum; Groot et al., 1988; Toorop et al., 2000), tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum; Leubner-Metzger et al., 1995; Petruzzelli et al., 2003), Arabidopsis (Bethke et al., 2007), and Lepidium (Müller et al., 2006; Linkies et al., 2009; Voegele et al., 2011). Arabidopsis continues to be an important model for elucidating the hormonal and genetic networks that regulate dormancy and germination (Kucera et al., 2005; Holdsworth et al., 2008), and new bioinformatic methods are providing insights into the evolutionary conservation of such networks in angiosperms (Bassel et al., 2011). Research using the close relative Lepidium, whose larger size makes it amenable to biomechanical techniques, has given insight into the hormonal control of endosperm weakening during germination and established that the mechanism of control is conserved between Arabidopsis, Lepidium, and tobacco (Müller et al., 2006; Linkies et al., 2009; Voegele et al., 2011). It has been reported that ABA is a key regulator of germination in tobacco, Arabidopsis, and Lepidium, controlling the process of endosperm rupture but not testa rupture (Leubner-Metzger et al., 1995; Petruzzelli et al., 2003; Müller et al., 2006). Microarray analyses of ABA-treated Arabidopsis and Lepidium seeds revealed that many cell wall remodeling enzyme (CWRE) genes are down-regulated upon exogenous application of ABA (Penfield et al., 2006; Linkies et al., 2009). Therefore, it follows that ABA impacts cell wall remodeling, which influences germination kinetics. The endosperm is therefore an important control tissue for seed germination and represents a useful model to investigate cell wall architectures and their remodeling.Cell walls are robust, multifunctional structures that not only protect cells from biotic and abiotic stresses, but also regulate growth, physiology and development (Albersheim et al., 2010). Cell walls are fibrous composites in which cellulose microfibrils are coextensive with/cross-linked by noncellulosic polysaccharides. In dicotyledonous plants, xyloglucan (XG) is a major polymer that can cross-link cellulose (Cosgrove, 2000). Load-bearing fibrous networks impart tensile strength to cell walls and are embedded in more soluble, gel-like matrices of pectic polysaccharides, glycoproteins, proteins, ions, and water. The constituent pectic polymers are currently classified as homogalacturonan (HG), rhamnogalacturonan I [RG-I; also comprising arabinans and type 1 (arabino)galactans as side branches] and rhamnogalacturonan II, and xylogalacturonan (XGA) (Willats et al., 2001; Caffall and Mohnen, 2009). Pectins are involved in a diverse range of processes, including the regulation of intercellular adhesion/cell separation at the middle lamella, regulating the ionic status, and the porosity of cell walls that influences the access of CWREs to substrates (Willats et al., 2001). Noncellulosic polysaccharides exhibit numerous structural elaborations and differ in their glycan, methyl, and acetyl substitution (Caffall and Mohnen, 2009; Burton et al., 2010). Such modifications have the potential to impact their functionality, including their ability to interact with other wall components and their susceptibility to degradation and modification by CWREs.Studies using Arabidopsis (Iglesias-Fernández et al., 2011), Lepidium (Morris et al., 2011), and tomato (Groot et al., 1988) have highlighted a role for endo-β-mannanases (EBMs), enzymes that degrade heteromannan polysaccharides, during seed germination. In hard seeds with heteromannan-rich endosperms, such as carob (Ceratonia siliqua), date (Phoenix dactylifera), Chinese senna (Senna obtusifolia), and fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum), however, it has been proposed that thinner walls in the micropylar endosperm (ME) and not EBM activity are responsible for allowing radicle protrusion during germination (Gong et al., 2005). Therefore, enzymatic cell wall remodeling and native cell wall architectural asymmetries both have the potential to impact on germination.Although studies on the molecular networks controlling germination have indicated a role for several classes of CWREs in endosperm remodeling and the promotion of germination (Penfield et al., 2006; Kanai et al., 2010; Morris et al., 2011), there is a paucity of information relating to the characterization of such changes at the cell wall level and, indeed, cell wall structures themselves. This study focuses on the targets of CWRE genes currently thought to be involved in seed germination (i.e. cellulose, XG, heteromannan, and pectic polysaccharides). We show that all three seeds possess a similar core cell wall architecture containing unesterified HG, arabinan, and XG. In tobacco, the core cell wall architecture is restricted to the ME, whereas in Arabidopsis and Lepidium, this architecture is observed throughout the endosperm. A further unique feature of the tobacco endosperm is abundant heteromannan. We also outline, using Arabidopsis, to what extent cell wall components contribute to the regulation of seed germination.     

Characterization of the Possible Roles for B Class MADS Box Genes in Regulation of Perianth Formation in Orchid

To investigate sepal/petal/lip formation in Oncidium Gower Ramsey, three paleoAPETALA3 genes, O. Gower Ramsey MADS box gene5 (OMADS5; clade 1), OMADS3 (clade 2), and OMADS9 (clade 3), and one PISTILLATA gene, OMADS8, were characterized. The OMADS8 and OMADS3 mRNAs were expressed in all four floral organs as well as in vegetative leaves. The OMADS9 mRNA was only strongly detected in petals and lips. The mRNA for OMADS5 was only strongly detected in sepals and petals and was significantly down-regulated in lip-like petals and lip-like sepals of peloric mutant flowers. This result revealed a possible negative role for OMADS5 in regulating lip formation. Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicated that OMADS5 formed homodimers and heterodimers with OMADS3 and OMADS9. OMADS8 only formed heterodimers with OMADS3, whereas OMADS3 and OMADS9 formed homodimers and heterodimers with each other. We proposed that sepal/petal/lip formation needs the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9. The determination of the final organ identity for the sepal/petal/lip likely depended on the presence or absence of OMADS5. The presence of OMADS5 caused short sepal/petal formation. When OMADS5 was absent, cells could proliferate, resulting in the possible formation of large lips and the conversion of the sepal/petal into lips in peloric mutants. Further analysis indicated that only ectopic expression of OMADS8 but not OMADS5/9 caused the conversion of the sepal into an expanded petal-like structure in transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants.The ABCDE model predicts the formation of any flower organ by the interaction of five classes of homeotic genes in plants (Yanofsky et al., 1990; Jack et al., 1992; Mandel et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Jofuku et al., 1994; Pelaz et al., 2000, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Pinyopich et al., 2003; Ditta et al., 2004; Jack, 2004). The A class genes control sepal formation. The A, B, and E class genes work together to regulate petal formation. The B, C, and E class genes control stamen formation. The C and E class genes work to regulate carpel formation, whereas the D class gene is involved in ovule development. MADS box genes seem to have a central role in flower development, because most ABCDE genes encode MADS box proteins (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991; Weigel and Meyerowitz, 1994; Purugganan et al., 1995; Rounsley et al., 1995; Theißen and Saedler, 1995; Theißen et al., 2000; Theißen, 2001).The function of B group genes, such as APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), has been thought to have a major role in specifying petal and stamen development (Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Krizek and Meyerowitz, 1996; Kramer et al., 1998; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007; Kanno et al., 2007; Whipple et al., 2007; Irish, 2009). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutation in AP3 or PI caused identical phenotypes of second whorl petal conversion into a sepal structure and third flower whorl stamen into a carpel structure (Bowman et al., 1989; Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994). Similar homeotic conversions for petal and stamen were observed in the mutants of the AP3 and PI orthologs from a number of core eudicots such as Antirrhinum majus, Petunia hybrida, Gerbera hybrida, Solanum lycopersicum, and Nicotiana benthamiana (Sommer et al., 1990; Tröbner et al., 1992; Angenent et al., 1993; van der Krol et al., 1993; Yu et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2004; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; de Martino et al., 2006), from basal eudicot species such as Papaver somniferum and Aquilegia vulgaris (Drea et al., 2007; Kramer et al., 2007), as well as from monocot species such as Zea mays and Oryza sativa (Ambrose et al., 2000; Nagasawa et al., 2003; Prasad and Vijayraghavan, 2003; Yadav et al., 2007; Yao et al., 2008). This indicated that the function of the B class genes AP3 and PI is highly conserved during evolution.It has been thought that B group genes may have arisen from an ancestral gene through multiple gene duplication events (Doyle, 1994; Theißen et al., 1996, 2000; Purugganan, 1997; Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999; Lamb and Irish, 2003; Kim et al., 2004; Stellari et al., 2004; Zahn et al., 2005; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007). In the gymnosperms, there was a single putative B class lineage that duplicated to generate the paleoAP3 and PI lineages in angiosperms (Kramer et al., 1998; Theißen et al., 2000; Irish, 2009). The paleoAP3 lineage is composed of AP3 orthologs identified in lower eudicots, magnolid dicots, and monocots (Kramer et al., 1998). Genes in this lineage contain the conserved paleoAP3- and PI-derived motifs in the C-terminal end of the proteins, which have been thought to be characteristics of the B class ancestral gene (Kramer et al., 1998; Tzeng and Yang, 2001; Hsu and Yang, 2002). The PI lineage is composed of PI orthologs that contain a highly conserved PI motif identified in most plant species (Kramer et al., 1998). Subsequently, there was a second duplication at the base of the core eudicots that produced the euAP3 and TM6 lineages, which have been subject to substantial sequence changes in eudicots during evolution (Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999). The paleoAP3 motif in the C-terminal end of the proteins was retained in the TM6 lineage and replaced by a conserved euAP3 motif in the euAP3 lineage of most eudicot species (Kramer et al., 1998). In addition, many lineage-specific duplications for paleoAP3 lineage have occurred in plants such as orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009), Ranunculaceae, and Ranunculales (Kramer et al., 2003; Di Stilio et al., 2005; Shan et al., 2006; Kramer, 2009).Unlike the A or C class MADS box proteins, which form homodimers that regulate flower development, the ability of B class proteins to form homodimers has only been reported in gymnosperms and in the paleoAP3 and PI lineages of some monocots. For example, LMADS1 of the lily Lilium longiflorum (Tzeng and Yang, 2001), OMADS3 of the orchid Oncidium Gower Ramsey (Hsu and Yang, 2002), and PeMADS4 of the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris (Tsai et al., 2004) in the paleoAP3 lineage, LRGLOA and LRGLOB of the lily Lilium regale (Winter et al., 2002), TGGLO of the tulip Tulipa gesneriana (Kanno et al., 2003), and PeMADS6 of the orchid P. equestris (Tsai et al., 2005) in the PI lineage, and GGM2 of the gymnosperm Gnetum gnemon (Winter et al., 1999) were able to form homodimers that regulate flower development. Proteins in the euAP3 lineage and in most paleoAP3 lineages were not able to form homodimers and had to interact with PI to form heterodimers in order to regulate petal and stamen development in various plant species (Schwarz-Sommer et al., 1992; Tröbner et al., 1992; Riechmann et al., 1996; Moon et al., 1999; Winter et al., 2002; Kanno et al., 2003; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2008). In addition to forming dimers, AP3 and PI were able to interact with other MADS box proteins, such as SEPALLATA1 (SEP1), SEP2, and SEP3, to regulate petal and stamen development (Pelaz et al., 2000; Honma and Goto, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Castillejo et al., 2005).Orchids are among the most important plants in the flower market around the world, and research on MADS box genes has been reported for several species of orchids during the past few years (Lu et al., 1993, 2007; Yu and Goh, 2000; Hsu and Yang, 2002; Yu et al., 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Tsai et al., 2004, 2008; Xu et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2009). Unlike the flowers in eudicots, the nearly identical shape of the sepals and petals as well as the production of a unique lip in orchid flowers make them a very special plant species for the study of flower development. Four clades (1–4) of genes in the paleoAP3 lineage have been identified in several orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009). Several works have described the possible interactions among these four clades of paleoAP3 genes and one PI gene that are involved in regulating the differentiation and formation of the sepal/petal/lip of orchids (Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009). However, the exact mechanism that involves the orchid B class genes remains unclear and needs to be clarified by more experimental investigations.O. Gower Ramsey is a popular orchid with important economic value in cut flower markets. Only a few studies have been reported on the role of MADS box genes in regulating flower formation in this plant species (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). An AP3-like MADS gene that regulates both floral formation and initiation in transgenic Arabidopsis has been reported (Hsu and Yang, 2002). In addition, four AP1/AGAMOUS-LIKE9 (AGL9)-like MADS box genes have been characterized that show novel expression patterns and cause different effects on floral transition and formation in Arabidopsis (Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). Compared with other orchids, the production of a large and well-expanded lip and five small identical sepals/petals makes O. Gower Ramsey a special case for the study of the diverse functions of B class MADS box genes during evolution. Therefore, the isolation of more B class MADS box genes and further study of their roles in the regulation of perianth (sepal/petal/lip) formation during O. Gower Ramsey flower development are necessary. In addition to the clade 2 paleoAP3 gene OMADS3, which was previously characterized in our laboratory (Hsu and Yang, 2002), three more B class MADS box genes, OMADS5, OMADS8, and OMADS9, were characterized from O. Gower Ramsey in this study. Based on the different expression patterns and the protein interactions among these four orchid B class genes, we propose that the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9 is required for sepal/petal/lip formation. Further sepal and petal formation at least requires the additional presence of OMADS5, whereas large lip formation was seen when OMADS5 expression was absent. Our results provide a new finding and information pertaining to the roles for orchid B class MADS box genes in the regulation of sepal/petal/lip formation.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

Analysis of the Rice ADP-Glucose Transporter (OsBT1) Indicates the Presence of Regulatory Processes in the Amyloplast Stroma That Control ADP-Glucose Flux into Starch

Previous studies showed that efforts to further elevate starch synthesis in rice (Oryza sativa) seeds overproducing ADP-glucose (ADPglc) were prevented by processes downstream of ADPglc synthesis. Here, we identified the major ADPglc transporter by studying the shrunken3 locus of the EM1093 rice line, which harbors a mutation in the BRITTLE1 (BT1) adenylate transporter (OsBt1) gene. Despite containing elevated ADPglc levels (approximately 10-fold) compared with the wild-type, EM1093 grains are small and shriveled due to the reduction in the amounts and size of starch granules. Increases in ADPglc levels in EM1093 were due to their poor uptake of ADP-[¹⁴C]glc by amyloplasts. To assess the potential role of BT1 as a rate-determining step in starch biosynthesis, the maize ZmBt1 gene was overexpressed in the wild-type and the GlgC (CS8) transgenic line expressing a bacterial glgC-TM gene. ADPglc transport assays indicated that transgenic lines expressing ZmBT1 alone or combined with GlgC exhibited higher rates of transport (approximately 2-fold), with the GlgC (CS8) and GlgC/ZmBT1 (CS8/AT5) lines showing elevated ADPglc levels in amyloplasts. These increases, however, did not lead to further enhancement in seed weights even when these plant lines were grown under elevated CO₂. Overall, our results indicate that rice lines with enhanced ADPglc synthesis and import into amyloplasts reveal additional barriers within the stroma that restrict maximum carbon flow into starch.Cereal grains contribute a significant portion of worldwide starch production. Unlike other plant tissue, starch biosynthesis in the endosperm storage organ of cereal grains is unique in its dependence on two ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) isoforms (Denyer et al., 1996; Thorbjørnsen et al., 1996; Sikka et al., 2001), a major cytosolic enzyme and a minor plastidial one, to generate ADP-glucose (ADPglc), the sugar nucleotide utilized by starch synthases in the amyloplast (Cakir et al., 2015). The majority of ADPglc in cereal endosperm is generated in the cytosol from AGPase (Tuncel and Okita, 2013) as well as by Suc synthase (Tuncel and Okita, 2013; Bahaji et al., 2014) and subsequently transported into amyloplasts by the BRITTLE-1 (BT1) protein located at the plastid envelope (Cao et al., 1995; Shannon et al., 1998).The Bt1 gene, first identified in maize (Zea mays; Mangelsdorf, 1926) and isolated by Sullivan et al. (1991), encodes a major amyloplast membrane protein ranging from 39 to 44 kD (Cao et al., 1995). The BT1 protein and its homologs belong to the mitochondrial carrier family (Sullivan et al., 1991; Haferkamp, 2007), which has a diverse range of substrates (Patron et al., 2004; Leroch et al., 2005; Kirchberger et al., 2008). The assignment of BT1 protein as the ADPglc transporter in cereal endosperms was first proposed by Sullivan et al. (1991), and then it was characterized based on the increased ADPglc levels and reduced ADPglc import rate in endosperms of BT1-deficient maize and barley (Hordeum vulgare) mutants (Tobias et al., 1992; Shannon et al., 1996, 1998; Patron et al., 2004). Biochemical transport studies of the maize BT1 showed that it imported ADPglc by counter exchanging with ADP (Kirchberger et al., 2007). The wheat (Triticum aestivum) BT1 homolog also transports ADPglc but has similar affinities for ADP and AMP as the counter-exchange substrate (Bowsher et al., 2007).Evidence from previous studies by our laboratory (Sakulsingharoj et al., 2004; Nagai et al., 2009) suggested the potential role of BT1 as well as other downstream processes as a rate-limiting step in starch biosynthesis in the transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) GlgC (CS8) lines overexpressing an up-regulated AGPase (Escherichia coli glgC-TM). In GlgC (CS8) rice lines, grain weights (starch) are elevated up to 15% compared with wild-type plants, indicating that the AGPase-catalyzed reaction is a rate-limiting step in starch biosynthesis under normal conditions. When transgenic GlgC (CS8) plants were grown under elevated CO₂ levels, no further increases in grain weight were evident compared with those grown at ambient CO₂. As Suc levels are elevated in leaf blades, leaf sheaths, culms (Rowland-Bamford et al., 1990), and peduncle exudates (Chen et al., 1994) in rice plants grown under elevated CO₂, developing GlgC (CS8) grains were unable to convert the increased levels of sugars into starch. This lack of increase indicated that the AGPase-catalyzed reaction (ADPglc synthesis) was no longer rate limiting and that one or more downstream processes regulated carbon flux from source tissues in developing GlgC (CS8) endosperm (Sakulsingharoj et al., 2004). This view is also supported by a subsequent metabolite study in which several GlgC (CS8) lines were found to contain up to 46% higher ADPglc levels than wild-type plants (Nagai et al., 2009). As this increase in ADPglc levels was nearly 3-fold higher than the increase in grain weight, starch biosynthesis is saturated with respect to ADPglc levels and carbon flow into starch is restricted by one or more downstream steps. Potential events that may limit the utilization of ADPglc in starch in GlgC (CS8) lines are the import of this sugar nucleotide via the BT1 transporter into amyloplasts and/or the utilization of ADPglc by starch synthases. Mutant analysis of the two major starch synthases indicated no significant impact on grain weight when one of these starch synthases was nonfunctional, suggesting that this enzyme activity, contributed by multiple enzyme isoforms, is present at excessive levels (Fujita et al., 2006, 2007). Therefore, we suspected that BT1 is the likely candidate limiting carbon flow into starch in GlgC (CS8) endosperms.The aim of this study was to investigate the role of BT1 in mediating the transport of ADPglc into amyloplast and to determine whether this transport activity is rate limiting in rice endosperm. In order to address these questions, we show that BT1 is the major transporter of ADPglc by analysis of the EM1093 rice line, which contains a mutation at the shrunken3 (shr3) locus and, specifically, in the OsBt1-1 gene. Second, we assessed the impact of the expression of the maize ZmBt1 gene in wild-type and GlgC (CS8) seeds to determine the potential limiting role of BT1 transport activity on starch biosynthesis. Our results indicate that BT1 is essential for starch synthesis but is not rate limiting and that one or more stroma-localized processes limit maximum carbon flow into starch.