Structural basis of transmembrane domain interactions in integrin signaling

Cell surface receptors of the integrin family are pivotal to cell adhesion and migration. The activation state of heterodimeric αβ integrins is correlated to the association state of the single-pass α and β transmembrane domains. The association of integrin αIIbβ3 transmembrane domains, resulting in an inactive receptor, is characterized by the asymmetric arrangement of a straight (αIIb) and tilted (β3) helix relative to the membrane in congruence to the dissociated structures. This allows for a continuous association interface centered on helix-helix glycine-packing and an unusual αIIb(GFF) structural motif that packs the conserved Phe-Phe residues against the β3 transmembrane helix, enabling αIIb(D723)β3(R995) electrostatic interactions. The transmembrane complex is further stabilized by the inactive ectodomain, thereby coupling its association state to the ectodomain conformation. In combination with recently determined structures of an inactive integrin ectodomain and an activating talin/β complex that overlap with the αβ transmembrane complex, a comprehensive picture of integrin bi-directional transmembrane signaling has emerged.Key words: cell adhesion, membrane protein, integrin, platelet, transmembrane complex, transmembrane signalingThe communication of biological signals across the plasma membrane is fundamental to cellular function. The ubiquitous family of integrin adhesion receptors exhibits the unusual ability to convey signals bi-directionally (outside-in and inside-out signaling), thereby controlling cell adhesion, migration and differentiation.^1–5 Integrins are Type I heterodimeric receptors that consist of large extracellular domains (>700 residues), single-pass transmembrane (TM) domains, and mostly short cytosolic tails (<70 residues). The activation state of heterodimeric integrins is correlated to the association state of the TM domains of their α and β subunits.^6–10 TM dissociation initiated from the outside results in the transmittal of a signal into the cell, whereas dissociation originating on the inside results in activation of the integrin to bind ligands such as extracellular matrix proteins. The elucidation of the role of the TM domains in integrin-mediated adhesion and signaling has been the subject of extensive research efforts, perhaps commencing with the demonstration that the highly conserved GFFKR sequence motif of α subunits (Fig. 1), which closely follows the first charged residue on the intracellular face, αIIb(K989), constrains the receptor to a default low affinity state.¹¹ Despite these efforts, an understanding of this sequence motif had not been reached until such time as the structure of the αIIb TM segment was determined.¹² In combination with the structure of the β3 TM segment¹³ and available mutagenesis data,^6,9,10,14,15 this has allowed the first correct prediction of the overall association of an integrin αβ TM complex.¹² The predicted association was subsequently confirmed by the αIIbβ3 complex structure determined in phospholipid bicelles,¹⁶ as well as by the report of a similar structure based on molecular modeling using disulfide-based structural constraints.¹⁷ In addition to the structures of the dissociated and associated αβ TM domains, their membrane embedding was defined^{12,13,16,18,19} and it was experimentally recognized that, in the context of the native receptor, the TM complex is stabilized by the inactive, resting ectodomain.¹⁶ These advances in integrin membrane structural biology are complemented by the recent structures of a resting integrin ectodomain and an activating talin/β cytosolic tail complex that overlap with the αβ TM complex,^20,21 allowing detailed insight into integrin bi-directional TM signaling.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Amino acid sequence of integrin αIIb and β3 transmembrane segments and flanking regions. Membrane-embedded residues^{12,13,16,18,19} are enclosed by a gray box. Residues 991–995 constitute the highly conserved GFFKR sequence motif of integrin α subunits.     

Why have chloroplasts developed a unique motility system?

Organelle movement in plants is dependent on actin filaments with most of the organelles being transported along the actin cables by class XI myosins. Although chloroplast movement is also actin filament-dependent, a potential role of myosin motors in this process is poorly understood. Interestingly, chloroplasts can move in any direction and change the direction within short time periods, suggesting that chloroplasts use the newly formed actin filaments rather than preexisting actin cables. Furthermore, the data on myosin gene knockouts and knockdowns in Arabidopsis and tobacco do not support myosins'' XI role in chloroplast movement. Our recent studies revealed that chloroplast movement and positioning are mediated by the short actin filaments localized at chloroplast periphery (cp-actin filaments) rather than cytoplasmic actin cables. The accumulation of cp-actin filaments depends on kinesin-like proteins, KAC1 and KAC2, as well as on a chloroplast outer membrane protein CHUP1. We propose that plants evolved a myosin XI-independent mechanism of the actin-based chloroplast movement that is distinct from the mechanism used by other organelles.Key words: actin, Arabidopsis, blue light, kinesin, myosin, organelle movement, phototropinOrganelle movement and positioning are pivotal aspects of the intracellular dynamics in most eukaryotes. Although plants are sessile organisms, their organelles are quickly repositioned in response to fluctuating environmental conditions and certain endogenous signals. By and large, plant organelle movements and positioning are dependent on actin filaments, although microtubules play certain accessory roles in organelle dynamics.^1,2 Actin inhibitors effectively retard the movements of mitochondria,^3–6 peroxisomes,^5,7–11 Golgi stacks,^12,13 endoplasmic reticulum (ER),^14,15 and nuclei.^16–18 These organelles are co-aligned and associated with actin filaments.^{5,7,8,10–12,15,18} Recent progress in this field started to reveal the molecular motility system responsible for the organelle transport in plants.¹⁹Chloroplast movement is among the most fascinating models of organelle movement in plants because it is precisely controlled by ambient light conditions.^20,21 Weak light induces chloroplast accumulation response so that chloroplasts can capture photosynthetic light efficiently (Fig. 1A). Strong light induces chloroplast avoidance response to escape from photodamage (Fig. 1B).²² The blue light-induced chloroplast movement is mediated by the blue light receptor phototropin (phot). In some cryptogam plants, the red light-induced chloroplast movement is regulated by a chimeric phytochrome/phototropin photoreceptor neochrome.^23–25 In a model plant Arabidopsis, phot1 and phot2 function redundantly to regulate the accumulation response,²⁶ whereas phot2 alone is essential for the avoidance response.^27,28 Several additional factors regulating chloroplast movement were identified by analyses of Arabidopsis mutants deficient in chloroplast photorelocation.^29–32 In particular, identification of CHUP1 (chloroplast unusual positioning 1) revealed the connection between chloroplasts and actin filaments at the molecular level.²⁹ CHUP1 is a chloroplast outer membrane protein capable of interacting with F-actin, G-actin and profilin in vitro.^29,33,34 The chup1 mutant plants are defective in both the chloroplast movement and chloroplast anchorage to the plasma membrane,^22,29,33 suggesting that CHUP1 plays an important role in linking chloroplasts to the plasma membrane through the actin filaments. However, how chloroplasts move using the actin filaments and whether chloroplast movement utilizes the actin-based motility system similar to other organelle movements remained to be determined.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Schematic distribution patterns of chloroplasts in a palisade cell under different light conditions, weak (A) and strong (B) lights. Shown as a side view of mid-part of the cell and a top view with three different levels (i.e., top, middle and bottom of the cell). The cell was irradiated from the leaf surface shown as arrows. Weak light induces chloroplast accumulation response (A) and strong light induces the avoidance response (B).Here, we review the recent findings pointing to existence of a novel actin-based mechanisms for chloroplast movement and discuss the differences between the mechanism responsible for movement of chloroplasts and other organelles.     

(h)GR,beans and drought stress

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are commonly found in plants as natural by-products of the metabolism but their production is greatly enhanced under abiotic stresses. Particular metabolites and enzymes belonging to the ascorbate-glutathione cycle are able to scavenge these deleterious molecules and modulate the cellular redox-status. In the March issue of Journal of Plant Physiology, we have shown that drought stress induces a raise in glutathione reductase (GR) activity and gene expression that could be related to the intensity of the drought treatment and the drought susceptibility of the bean cultivar (cowpea and/or common bean). In the present addendum we show new data on GR specific activity during progressive drought stress and recovery of the drought-susceptible bean cultivar which can be related to the previously found dual-targeted GR gene expression. Furthermore, since in leguminous plants homoglutathione (hGSH) is generally the most abundant low molecular weight thiol form, we discuss on the occurrence of a (homo)glutathione reductase activity in beans.Key words: common bean, cowpea, drought stress, (homo)glutathione, (homo)glutathione reductase, legumes, Phaseolus vulgaris, recovery, Vigna unguiculataDrought stress is the most common form of abiotic stress and plants are likely to encounter periods of water shortage at least once in their lifecycle. One of the inevitable consequences of drought stress is enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production which will imbalance the cellular redox-status. This shift in the steady-state cellular redox-status is currently believed to have an initial signaling effect, triggering adaptive/defense responses (reviewed in ref. ¹). However, in order to avoid oxidative stress, enhanced ROS production must be kept under tight control by the cellular antioxidant machinery. Glutathione reductase (GR; EC 1.6.4.2) is a major cellular antioxidant enzyme. It belongs to the ascorbate-glutathione cycle and it is ubiquitously found in all cellular compartments.² Using several bean plants (common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris and cowpea, Vigna unguiculata) as a model system to study drought responses and relate them to the degree of drought tolerance and/or susceptibility, we have shown that severe drought stress leads to an enhanced cellular GR activity related to the drought susceptibility of the cultivar.^3,4 Similar results have also been found in a wheat system composed of drought-tolerant and susceptible cultivars.⁵ Regarding the more susceptible cultivar of our bean system (P.v. Carioca) and under severe drought stress (S3, Ψ_w = −2.0 MPa; RWC = 50.9%), total leaf GR activity was raised to approximately 200% when compared to control plants (C, Ψ_w = −0.5 MPa; RWC = 95.3%) (Fig. 1). This could translate a higher degree of oxidative stress due to enhanced ROS production in drought-susceptible cultivars than in drought-tolerant ones. In fact it has been shown that at the cellular level these drought-susceptible bean plants suffer a higher degree of membrane integrity loss when compared to the drought-tolerant.^6–8 This can be related to enhanced ROS production since proteins and lipids of cellular membranes are main targets of ROS peroxidation.⁹Open in a separate windowFigure 1GR-specific activity and relative water content (RWC%) in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) ‘Carioca’ leaves. GR-specific activity and RWC were measured in control, severely drought stressed and on rewatered plants. Values are means ± s.d. of three to five independent measurements. GR activity was assayed by following the oxidation of NADPH (decrease in absorbance at 340 nm) and expressed in nmoles min⁻¹ mg⁻¹ protein. RWC was measured according to Weatherley.²⁴ Control plants (C), Ψ_w = −0.5 MPa; severely droughted plants (S3), Ψ_w = −2.0 MPa; 24 h rehydrated plant (24R), Ψ_w = −0.5 MPa; 48 h rehydrated plant (48R), Ψ_w = −0.5 MPa.Considering the responses to drought at the whole-plant level, susceptible and tolerant beans also differ. In fact, drought-tolerant bean cultivars present a water-saving strategy by precocious control of stomatal opening which allows for photosynthetic activity to proceed at lower leaf Ψ_w.^10–12 The maintenance of stomatal opening and photosynthetic activity during drought stress results in lower ROS production by photorespiration and/or the Mehler reaction as opposed to complete stomatal closure where inhibition of CO₂ fixation occurs.¹ Indeed, in the drought-tolerant cowpea cultivar, total GR activity was found constant throughout the progressive drought treatment.³After 24 h rewatering (24R, Ψ_w = −0.5 MPa; RWC = 88.1%), from a moderate water stress: Ψ_w = −1.5 MPa; RWC = 69.2%, GR activity in the drought-susceptible bean cultivar was further raised by ∼270% as compared to control (Fig. 1). This enhanced GR activity can be directly related to the upregulation of the dual-targeted form of the bean GR gene (PvGRdt) (targeted to both chloroplasts and mitochondria) observed on rewatering of this drought-susceptible cultivar.⁴ In fact a significant upregulation of PvGRdt was detected as soon as 6 h after rewatering and the high expression levels were maintained up to 24 h after rewatering to then decrease at 48 h after rewatering.⁴ Hence in the drought-susceptible cultivar it seems that the dual-targeted form is more responsive to drought and rewatering than the cytosolic form. The same pattern was also seen on the less tolerant cowpea cultivar.³ Enhanced dual-targeted GR expression (and GR activity) under drought could be related to enhanced ROS production at those particular cellular compartments (mitochondria and chloroplasts). In fact, under a PEG-induced water deficit, drought-susceptible bean plants showed a higher number of disorganized chloroplasts when compared to the drought-tolerant,⁷ indicating that these organelles experienced oxidative stress during the treatment.The GR enzyme is responsible for the reduction of glutathione disulfide (GSSG) to glutathione (GSH) using NADPH, and not only it keeps glutathione in the reduced state but it is also responsible for the maintenance of the cellular GSH:GSSG ratio.^13,14 Interestingly, in leguminous plants such as the present bean plants, homoglutathione (hGSH) replaces completely or in part, glutathione (GSH). Homoglutathione has been shown to be the most abundant tripeptide in common bean and pea (Pisum sativum),¹⁵ in soybean (Glycine max),¹⁶ and in Lotus japonicus.¹⁷ The synthesis of hGSH proceeds through two ATP-dependent steps, the first step being common with GSH synthesis, the second step adding a β-Alanine instead of a Glycine to form the tripeptide. In the case of cowpea, which was up to now considered to be a non hGSH producing legume,¹⁵ we have recently detected the presence of a homoglutathione synthetase (hGSHS) mRNA and activity (MH Cruz de Carvalho, J Brunet, A Lameta, Y Zuily-Fodil and D Contour-Ansel, unpublished data).Besides the chemical difference of the two thiol tripeptides, many of the roles ascribed to GSH are also performed by hGSH,^18,19 particularly the control of the cellular redox status and ROS scavenging.²⁰ However, the presence of hGSH questions on the occurrence of a homoglutathione reductase (hGR). A role for hGR as a detoxifying enzyme of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle has been suggested, using hGSSG (oxidized homoglutathione) instead of GSSG (oxidized glutathione), thus maintaining the cellular homoglutathione pool in the reduced state and acting as an antioxidative molecule in these plants.^21,22 It can hence be suggested that in beans and other leguminous plants where both thiols co-exist (hGSH and GSH), the (h)GR enzyme will act as either a GR or a hGR in accordance to the thiol utilized in the ascorbate-glutathione cycle.     

Immunohistochemical localization and functional characterization of somatostatin receptor subtypes in a corticotropin releasing hormone-secreting adrenal phaeochromocytoma: review of the literature and report of a case

Somastostatin receptors are frequently expressed in phaeochromocytoma but data on somatostatin receptor subtyping are scanty and the functional response to the somatostatin analogue octretide is still debated.We report an unusual case of pheochromocytoma, causing ectopic Cushing’s syndrome due to CRH production by the tumour cells, in a 50-yr-old woman. Abdominal computed tomography revealed an inhomogeneous, 9-cm mass in the right adrenal gland, and [¹¹¹In-DTPA⁰] octreotide scintigraphy showed an abnormal uptake of the radiotracer in the right perirenal region, corresponding to the adrenal mass. The patient underwent laparoscopic surgery and formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples were studied. The tumour was extensively characterized by immunohistochemistry and somatostatin receptor (SSTRs) subtypes expression was analyzed. Histological and immunohistochemical examination of the surgical specimens displayed a typical pheochromocytoma, which was found to be immunoreative to S-100, chromogranin A and neurofilaments. Immunostaining for SSTR subtypes showed a positive reaction for SSTR₁, SSTR_2A, SSTR_2B, antisera on tumour cells. The intense and diffuse immunostaining for corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) antiserum indicated that Cushing’s disease was dependent on CRH overproduction by the pheochromocytoma, in which no immunostaining for adrenocorticotropic hormone was found. Our report confirms the heterogeneity of the pattern of SSTR expression in pheochromocytomas, and provide further evidence for functional SSTR subtype SSTR_2a in a subgroup of pheochromocytomas, suggesting that these tumours may represent potential target for octreotide treatment.Key words: phaeochromocytoma, neuroendocrine tumours, somatostatin receptors, octreotide, corticotropin releasing hormone.Phaeochromocytomas are tumours derived from the chromaffin cells of the sympathoadrenal system, generally associated with cathecolamine overproduction. They represent a rare condition, occurring in less than 0.2% of patients with hypertension. The diagnosis of sporadic phaeochromocytoma is based on clinical history and features characterized by the triad episodic headache, sweating, and tachycardia, but an increasing number of these tumours are diagnosed in patients without classical symptoms (Pacak et al., 2001). Ectopic Cushing’s syndrome is one of the possible, albeit unusual, expression of pheochromocytoma. Up to date, there are few reports of pheochromocytomas producing adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and/or ACTH precursors (O’Brien T et al., 1992; Chen et al., 1995; White et al., 2000), and even more limited is the number of cases in which pheochromocytoma secrete corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) (Eng et al., 1999; Bayraktar et al., 2006).Similar to other neuroendocrine tumours, pheochromocytomas often express somatostatin receptors (SSTR) (De Herder and Hofland, 2004), but data on the specific SSTRs subtypes expressed within the tumours are thus far sparse and conflicting and the real therapeutic effectiveness of somatostatin analogue in these tumours is still debated (Reubi et al., 1992; Kubota et al., 1994; Epelbaum et al., 1995; Hofland et al., 1999; Mundschenk et al., 2003; Unger et al., 2004; Ueberberg et al., 2005; Unger et al., 2007).     

The galactolipid monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG) contributes to photosynthesis-related processes in Arabidopsis thaliana

Processes putatively dependent on the galactolipid monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG) were recently studied using the knockdown monogalactosyldiacylglycerol synthase 1 (mgd1-1) mutant (∼40% reduction in MGDG). Surprisingly, targeting of chloroplast proteins was not affected in mgd1-1 mutants, suggesting they retain sufficient MGDG to maintain efficient targeting. However, in dark-grown mgd1-1 plants the photoactive to photoinactive protochlorophyllide (Pchlide) ratio was increased, suggesting that photoprotective responses are induced in them. Nevertheless, mgd1-1 could not withstand high light intensities, apparently due to impairment of another photoprotective mechanism, the xanthophyll cycle (and hence thermal dissipation). This was mediated by increased conductivity of the thylakoid membrane leading to a higher pH in the thylakoid interior, which impaired the pH-dependent activation of violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE) and PsbS. These findings suggest that MGDG contribute directly to the regulation of photosynthesis-related processes.Key words: conductivity, galactolipid, light stress, photosynthesis, plastid, xanthophyllThe galactolipid monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG), the major lipid in plastids,¹ is mainly synthesised in inner plastid envelopes,² where monogalactosyldiacylglycerol synthase 1 (MGD1) catalyses the last step of its production.³ Two MGDG-deficient mutants are known: the knockdown mgd1-1 mutant, which accumulates ∼40% less MGDG than wild type,⁴ and the null mutant mgd1-2, which displays extremely severe defects in chloroplast and plant development.⁵ Thus, the mgd1-1 mutant is more suitable for assessing putative roles of MGDG in processes such as protein targeting and photoprotection.There are conflicting indications regarding the involvement of galactolipids in chloroplast protein targeting: some suggest they play an important role,^6–10 but not all.^11,12 The data recently collected for mgd1-1 do not support MGDG''s involvement in protein targeting, since (inter alia) the level of MGDG in mgd1-1 mutants is clearly sufficient for efficient targeting.¹³ Further, the galactolipid associated with the TOC complex¹² is digalactosyldiacylglycerol (DGDG) and the digalactosyldiacylglycerol synthase 1 (dgd1) mutant,¹⁴ which has ∼10% of wild-type levels of DGDG, has impaired import efficiency.^15,16 Hence, this may indicate that DGDG is relatively more important for chloroplast import than MGDG.The prolamellar bodies (PLBs) of etioplasts have high lipid-to-protein ratios compared to thylakoids. Their major lipid and protein are MGDG and NADPH:Pchlide oxidoreductase (POR), respectively,¹⁷ and MGDG putatively plays an important role, interactively with POR, in the formation of PLBs.^18–20 The transformation of PLBs into thylakoids involves phototransformation of photoactive Pchlide (F656), a precursor of chlorophyll. Non-photoactive Pchlide (F631) is susceptible to photooxidative damage, but POR is believed to suppress this.^21,22 After excitation at 440 nm, mgd1-1 mutants display distinctly higher fluorescence emission peaks corresponding to photoactive Pchlide than wild type counterparts and (hence) higher photoactive:non-photoactive Pchlide ratios.¹³ These changes may be photoprotective responses that favour formation of photoactive Pchlide and optimize the plants'' opportunities to use light for chlorophyll production, enabling the transformation of etioplasts into chloroplasts.Interestingly,the xanthophyll cycle, another photoprotective mechanism, is impaired in mgd1-1.¹³ Normally, the xanthophyll cycle pigment violaxanthin is de-epoxidized into antheraxanthin, and then into zeaxanthin, by the enzyme VDE (Fig. 1), which is dependent on MGDG.²³ MGDG is also an integral component of photosynthetic complexes.^24–26 Thus, since mgd1-1 mutants have reduced total amounts of xanthophyll and chlorophyll pigments, but increased chlorophyll a/b ratios, their photosynthesis capacity is unsurprisingly reduced, even though the organization of their electron transport chains is not strongly affected by the MGDG deficiency.¹³Open in a separate windowFigure 1Reactions of the xanthophyll cycle (adapted from ref. ²⁹). VDE, violaxanthin de-epoxidase; ZE, zeaxanthin epoxidase.During short-term high light stress, antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin are thought to facilitate dissipation of excess light energy in the PSII antenna bed by non-photochemical quenching.^27,28 Upon high light stress the pH decreases, triggering photoprotective mechanisms via changes in the PSII antenna system. The PsbS protein, which is involved in thermal dissipation, is protonated and initiates a conformational change in the PSII antenna bed. This change is further stabilized by the de-epoxidation of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin by the luminal VDE.²⁸ However, the thermal dissipation is impaired in mgd1-1 mutants at high light intensities (>1000 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹) making them more susceptible to light stress. Surprisingly, this is not mediated by direct effects on VDE and PsbS activities, but by changes in the proton conductivity of the thylakoid membrane.¹³The steady-state capacity of the xanthophyll cycle is reduced in mgd1-1 mutants, due to a ∼40% reduction in the proton motive force (pmf) across their thylakoid membranes, indicating that they have impaired capacities to energize these membranes. Nevertheless, the pmf is more or less equal to wild type under light-limited conditions (200 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹ light); it is only the increase in pmf in high light intensities that is impaired in the mutants.¹³ This leads to the thylakoid lumen being less acidic in mgd1-1 than in wild type, hampering full activation of VDE and PsbS. Thus, the thylakoid lumen pH is above the threshold level required for full activation of PsbS and VDE under steady-state conditions and so de-epoxidation rates are retarded and the equilibrium between zeaxanthin and violaxanthin starts to shift slightly towards violaxanthin (Fig. 2).¹³ Thus, increased conductivity of the thylakoid membranes is probably responsible for the diminished non-photochemical quenching in mgd1-1, and the findings strongly indicate that MGDG is required for efficient photosynthesis and photoprotection, in addition to being a physical membrane constituent.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Schematic diagram illustrating the normal mode of action of the xanthophyll cycle. In standard light conditions, V is bound to the photosynthetic complexes and harvests light. In strong light, V is released from the complexes and converted to Z by VDE, which is unable to access V when it is associated with the photosynthetic complexes. The newly formed Z then binds to the photosynthetic complexes (at the PsbS protein), where it dissipates excess energy through NPQ. V, violaxanthin; A, antheraxanthin; Z, zeaxanthin; VDE, violaxanthin de-epoxidase; ZE, zeaxanthin epoxidase. Arrows indicate the directions of reactions.     

Prions: En route from structural models to structures

The prion hypothesis^1–3 states that the prion and non-prion form of a protein differ only in their 3D conformation and that different strains of a prion differ by their 3D structure.^4,5 Recent technical developments have enabled solid-state NMR to address the atomic-resolution structures of full-length prions, and a first comparative study of two of them, HET-s and Ure2p, in fibrillar form, has recently appeared as a pair of companion papers.^6,7 Interestingly, the two structures are rather different: HET-s features an exceedingly well-ordered prion domain and a partially disordered globular domain. Ure2p in contrast features a very well ordered globular domain with a conserved fold, and—most probably—a partially ordered prion domain.⁶ For HET-s, the structure of the prion domain is characterized at atomic-resolution. For Ure2p, structure determination is under way, but the highly resolved spectra clearly show that information at atomic resolution should be achievable.Key words: prion, NMR, solid-state NMR, MAS, structure, Ure2p, HET-sDespite the large interest in the basic mechanisms of fibril formation and prion propagation, little is known about the molecular structure of prions at atomic resolution and the mechanism of propagation. Prions with related properties to the ones responsible for mammalian diseases were also discovered in yeast and funghi^8,9 which provide convenient model system for their studies. Prion proteins described include the mammalian prion protein PrP, Ure2p,¹⁰ Rnq1p,¹¹ Sup35,¹² Swi1,¹³ and Cyc8,¹⁴ from bakers yeast (S. cervisiae) and HET-s from the filamentous fungus P. anserina. The soluble non-prion form of the proteins characterized in vitro is a globular protein with an unfolded, dynamically disordered N- or C-terminal tail.^15–18 In the prion form, the proteins form fibrillar aggregates, in which the tail adopts a different conformation and is thought to be the dominant structural element for fibril formation.Fibrills are difficult to structurally characterize at atomic resolution, as X-ray diffraction and liquid-state NMR cannot be applied because of the non-crystallinity and the mass of the fibrils. Solid-state NMR, in contrast, is nowadays well suited for this purpose. The size of the monomer, between 230 and 685 amino-acid residues for the prions of Figure 1, and therefore the number of resonances in the spectrum—that used to be large for structure determination—is now becoming tractable by this method.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Prions identified today and characterized as consisting of a prion domain (blue) and a globular domain (red).Prion proteins characterized so far were found to be usually constituted of two domains, namely the prion domain and the globular domain (see Fig. 1). This architecture suggests a divide-and-conquer approach to structure determination, in which the globular and prion domain are investigated separately. In isolation, the latter, or fragments thereof, were found to form β-sheet rich structures (e.g., Ure2p(1-89),^6,19 Rnq1p(153-405)²⁰ and HET-s(218-289)²¹). The same conclusion was reached by investigating Sup35(1-254).²² All these fragements have been characterized as amyloids, which we define in the sense that a significant part of the protein is involved in a cross-beta motif.²³ An atomic resolution structure however is available presently only for the HET-s prion domain, and was obtained from solid-state NMR²⁴ (vide infra). It contains mainly β-sheets, which form a triangular hydrophobic core. While this cross-beta structure can be classified as an amyloid, its triangular shape does deviate significantly from amyloid-like structures of smaller peptides.²³Regarding the globular domains, structures have been determined by x-ray crystallography (Ure2p^25,26 and HET-s²⁷), as well as NMR (mammal prions^15,28–30). All reveal a protein fold rich in α-helices, and dimeric structures for the Ure2 and HET-s proteins. The Ure2p fold resembles that of the β-class glutathione S-transferases (GST), but lacks GST activity.²⁵It is a central question for the structural biology of prions if the divide-and-conquer approach imposed by limitations in current structural approaches is valid. Or in other words: can the assembly of full-length prions simply be derived from the sum of the two folds observed for the isolated domains?