Long non‐coding RNAs in non‐small cell lung cancer as biomarkers and therapeutic targets

Lung cancer‐associated mortality is the most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Non‐coding RNAs (ncRNAs), with no protein‐coding ability, have multiple biological roles. Long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a recently characterized class of ncRNAs that are over 200 nucleotides in length. Many lncRNAs have the ability of facilitating or inhibiting the development and progression of tumours, including non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of their fundamental roles in regulating gene expression, along with their involvement in the biological mechanisms underlying tumourigenesis, they are a promising class of tissue‐ and/or blood‐based cancer biomarkers. In this review, we highlight the emerging roles of lncRNAs in NSCLC, and discuss their potential clinical applications as diagnostic and prognostic markers and as therapeutic targets.     

Long non‐coding RNAs in melanoma

Melanoma is the most lethal cutaneous cancer with a highly aggressive and metastatic phenotype. While recent genetic and epigenetic studies have shed new insights into the mechanism of melanoma development, the involvement of regulatory non‐coding RNAs remain unclear. Long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a group of endogenous non‐protein‐coding RNAs with the capacity to regulate gene expression at multiple levels. Recent evidences have shown that lncRNAs can regulate many cellular processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, migration and invasion. In the melanoma, deregulation of a number of lncRNAs, such as HOTAIR, MALAT1, BANCR, ANRIL, SPRY‐IT1 and SAMMSON, have been reported. Our review summarizes the functional role of lncRNAs in melanoma and their potential clinical application for diagnosis, prognostication and treatment.     

The latest progress on miR‐374 and its functional implications in physiological and pathological processes

Non‐coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been emerging players in cell development, differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis. Based on their differences in length and structure, they are subdivided into several categories including long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs >200nt), stable non‐coding RNAs (60‐300nt), microRNAs (miRs or miRNAs, 18‐24nt), circular RNAs, piwi‐interacting RNAs (26‐31nt) and small interfering RNAs (about 21nt). Therein, miRNAs not only directly regulate gene expression through pairing of nucleotide bases between the miRNA sequence and a specific mRNA that leads to the translational repression or degradation of the target mRNA, but also indirectly affect the function of downstream genes through interactions with lncRNAs and circRNAs. The latest studies have highlighted their importance in physiological and pathological processes. MiR‐374 family member are located at the X‐chromosome inactivation center. In recent years, numerous researches have uncovered that miR‐374 family members play an indispensable regulatory role, such as in reproductive disorders, cell growth and differentiation, calcium handling in the kidney, various cancers and epilepsy. In this review, we mainly focus on the role of miR‐374 family members in multiple physiological and pathological processes. More specifically, we also summarize their promising potential as novel prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets from bench to bedside.     

Integrative analysis of genome‐wide lncRNA and mRNA expression in newly synthesized Brassica hexaploids

Polyploidization, as a significant evolution force, has been considered to facilitate plant diversity. The expression levels of lncRNAs and how they control the expression of protein‐coding genes in allopolyploids remain largely unknown. In this study, lncRNA expression profiles were compared between Brassica hexaploid and its parents using a high‐throughput sequencing approach. A total of 2,725, 1,672, and 2,810 lncRNAs were discovered in Brassica rapa, Brassica carinata, and Brassica hexaploid, respectively. It was also discovered that 725 lncRNAs were differentially expressed between Brassica hexaploid and its parents, and 379 lncRNAs were nonadditively expressed in this hexaploid. LncRNAs have multiple expression patterns between Brassica hexaploid and its parents and show paternal parent‐biased expression. These lncRNAs were found to implement regulatory functions directly in the long‐chain form, and acted as precursors or targets of miRNAs. According to the prediction of the targets of differentially expressed lncRNAs, 109 lncRNAs were annotated, and their target genes were involved in the metabolic process, pigmentation, reproduction, exposure to stimulus, biological regulation, and so on. Compared with the paternal parent, differentially expressed lncRNAs between Brassica hexaploid and its maternal parent participated in more regulation pathways. Additionally, 61 lncRNAs were identified as putative targets of known miRNAs, and 15 other lncRNAs worked as precursors of miRNAs. Some conservative motifs of lncRNAs from different groups were detected, which indicated that these motifs could be responsible for their regulatory roles. Our findings may provide a reference for the further study of the function and action mechanisms of lncRNAs during plant evolution.