RNA--protein interactions in the ribosome. IV. Structure and properties of binding sites for proteins S4, S16/S17 and S20 in the 16S RNA

Proteins S4, S16/S17 and S20 of the 30 S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli+ associate with specific binding sites in the 16 S ribosomal RNA. A systematic investigation of the co-operative interactions that occur when two or more of these proteins simultaneously attach to the 16 S RNA indicate that their binding sites lie near to one another. The binding site for S4 has previously been located within a 550-nucleotide RNA fragment of approximately 9 S that arises from the 5′-terminal portion of the 16 S RNA upon limited hydrolysis with pancreatic ribonuclease. The 9 S RNA was unable to associate with S20 and S16/S17, however, either alone or in combination. A fragment of similar size and nucleotide sequence, termed the 9 S¹ RNA, has been isolated following ribonuclease digestion of the complex of 16 S RNA with S20 and S16/S17. The 9 S¹ RNA bound not only S4, but S20 and S16/S17 as well, although the fragment complex was stable only when both of the latter protein fractions were present together. Nonetheless, measurements of binding stoichiometry demonstrated the interactions to be specific under these conditions. A comparison of the 9 S and 9 S¹ RNAs by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels containing urea revealed that the two fragments differ substantially in the number and distribution of hidden breaks. Contrary to expectation, the RNA in the ribonucleoprotein complex appeared to be more accessible to ribonuclease than the free 16 S RNA as judged by the smaller average length of the sub-fragments recovered from the 9 S¹ RNA. These results suggest that the binding of S4, S16/S17 and S20 brings about a conformational alteration within the 5′ third of the 16 S RNA.To delineate further the portions of the RNA chain that interact with S4, S16/S17 and S20, specific fragments encompassing subsequences from the 5′ third of the 16 S RNA were sought. Two such fragments, designated 12 S-I and 12 S-II, were purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis from partial T₁ ribonuclease digests of the 16 S RNA. The two RNAs, which contain 290 and 210 nucleotides, respectively, are contiguous and together span the entire 5′-terminal 500 residues of the 16 S RNA molecule. When tested individually, neither 12 S-I nor 12 S-II bound S4, S16/S17 or S20. If heated together at 40 °C in the presence of Mg²⁺ ions, however, the two fragments together formed an 8 S complex which associated with S4 alone, with S16/S17 + S20 in combination, and with S4 + S16/S17 + S20 when incubated with an un fractionated mixture of 30 S subunit proteins. These results imply that each fragment contains part of the corresponding binding sites.     

Protein binding sites on Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA; RNA regions that are protected by proteins S7, S9 and S19, and by proteins S8, S15 and S17.

Selected groups of isolated 14C-labelled proteins from E. coli 30S ribosomal subunits were reconstituted with 32P-labelled 16S RNA, and the reconstituted complexes were partially digested with ribonuclease A. RNA fragments protected by the proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis and subjected to sequence analysis. Complexes containing proteins S7 and S19 protected an RNA region comprising helices 29 to 32, part of helix 41, and helices 42 and 43 of the 16S RNA secondary structure. Addition of protein S9 had no effect. When compared with previous data for proteins S7, S9, S14 and S19, these results suggest that S14 interacts with helix 33, and that S9 and S14 together interact with the loop-end of helix 41. Complexes containing proteins S8, S15 and S17 protected helices 7 to 10 as well as the "S8-S15 binding site" (helices 20, 22 and parts of helices 21 and 23). When protein S15 was omitted, S8 and S18 showed protection of part of helix 44 in addition to the latter regions. The results are discussed in terms of our model for the detailed arrangement of proteins and RNA in the 30S subunit.     

The topography of the 5' end of 16-S RNA in the presence and absence of ribosomal proteins S4 and S20

A ribonucleoprotein prepared by strong ribonuclease digestion of a complex of 16-S ribosomal RNA and proteins S4 and S20 from Escherichia coli has been characterized; its nucleotide sequence, the positions of enzyme cuts and the sequence excisions have been placed in the completed sequence of 16-S RNA. The positions and yields of enzyme cuts, and excisions of sequence, are compared with those of various ribonucleoproteins prepared with S4 or S20 alone, and with the ribonuclease-resistant S4 RNA prepared from renatured 16-s RNA in the absence of ribosomal protein. These data yield important information on the topography and organisation of the 5' third of the 16-s RNA which is selectively maintained in its native conformation by the bound proteins; they also provide criteria for testing secondary structural models of this region of 16-S RNA.     

A ribonucleoprotein fragment of the 30 S ribosome of E. coli containing two contiguous domains of the 16 S RNA.

Ribonucleoprotein fragments of the 30 S ribosome of E. coli have been prepared by limited ribonuclease digestion and mild heating of the ribosome in a constant ionic environment. One such fragment has been described previously. A second electrophoretically homogeneous fragment has now been isolated and its RNA and protein moieties have been characterized. It contains the 5' half of the 16 S RNA, encompassing domains I and II except for the extreme 5' terminus and several small gaps. Seven proteins are present: S4, S5, S6, S8, S12, S15 and S20. The RNA binding sites of five of these proteins are known, and all are RNA sequences that are present in the fragment. Published neutron scattering and immuno-electron microscopic data indicate that six of the proteins are clustered together in a cross sectional slice through the center of the subunit. After deproteinization, the RNA moiety gives two bands in gel electrophoresis, one containing domains I and II and the other, essentially only domain II. The former, although larger, migrates faster in gel electrophoresis, indicating that RNA domains I and II interact with each other in such a way as to become more compact than domain II by itself.     

Binding sites for ribosomal proteins S8 and S15 in the 16 S RNA of Escherichia coli.

A fragment of the 16 S ribosomal RNA of Escherichia coli that contains the binding sites for proteins S8 and S15 of the 30 S ribosomal subunit has been isolated and characterized. The RNA fragment, which sediments as 5 S, was partially protected from pancreatic RNAase digestion when S15 alone, or S8 and S15 together, were bound to the 16 S RNA. Purified 5 S RNA was shown to reassociate specifically with protein S15 by analysis of binding stoichiometry. Although interaction between the fragment and protein S8 alone could not be detected, the 5 S RNA selectively bound both S8 and S15 when incubated with an unfractionated mixture of 30-S subunit proteins. Nucleotide sequence analysis demonstrated that the 5 S RNA arises from the middle of the 16 S RNA molecule and encompasses approximately 150 residues from Sections C, C'1 and C'2. Section C consists of a long hairpin loop with an extensively hydrogen-bonded stem and is contiguous with Section C'1. Sections C'1 and C'2, although not contiguous, are highly complementary and it is likely that together they comprise the base-paired stem of an adjacent loop.     

Mechanism of ribosomal subunit association: discrimination of specific sites in 16 S RNA essential for association activity.

Modification of 30 S ribosomal subunits with kethoxal causes loss of their ability to associate with 50 S subunits under tight couple conditions. To identify those 16 S RNA sequences important for the association. ³²P-labeled 30 S subunits were partially inactivated by reaction with kethoxal. The remaining association-competent 30 S subunits were selected from the modified population by their ability to form 70 S ribosomes. Comparison of kethoxal diagonal maps of the association-competent subunits with those of the total population of modified subunits reveals nine sites in 16 S RNA whose modification leads to loss of association activity. Eight of these sites were previously found to be protected from kethoxal attack and one was shown to have enhanced reactivity in 70 S ribosomes (Chapman &; Noller, 1977). As before, these sites are not distributed thoughout the molecule, but are found to be clustered in two regions, at the middle and at the 3′ terminus of the 16 S RNA chain.We interpret these findings in terms of a simple preliminary model for the functional organization of 16 S RNA, supported by the observations of other investigators, in which we divide the molecule into four domains. (1) Residues 1 to 600 are involved mainly in structural organization and assembly. (2) Residues 600 to 850 include sites which make contact with the 50 S subunit and are essential for subunit association. (3) Sites from the domain comprising residues 850 to 1350 line a pocket at the interface between the two ribosomal subunits. and contribute to the binding site(s) for transfer RNA. (4) Residues 1350 to 1541 also contain sequences which bind the 50 S subunit, but some sites in this domain alternatively participate in the initiation of protein synthesis.     

RNA-protein interactions in the ribosome. I. Characterization and ribonuclease digestion of 16 S RNA-ribosomal protein complexes

Proteins from the 30 S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli were fractionated by column chromatography and individually incubated with 16 S ribosomal RNA. Stable and specific complexes were formed between proteins S4, S7, S8, S15 and S20, and the 16 S RNA. Protein S13 and one or both proteins of the $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$ mixture bound more weakly to the RNA, although these interactions too were apparently specific. The binding of $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$ was found to be markedly stimulated by proteins S4, S8, S15 and S20. Limited digestion of the RNA-protein complexes with T₁ or pancreatic ribonucleases yielded a variety of partially overlapping RNA fragments, which retained one or more of the proteins. Since similar fragments were recovered when 16 S RNA alone was digested under the same conditions, their stability could not be accounted for by the presence of bound protein. The integrity of the fragments was, however, strongly influenced by the magnesium ion concentration at which ribonuclease digestion was carried out. Each of the RNA fragments was characterized by fingerprinting and positioned within the sequence of the 1600-nucleotide 16 S RNA molecule. The location of ribosomal protein binding sites was delimited by the pattern of fragments to which a given protein bound. The binding sites for proteins S4, S8, S15, S20 and, possibly, S13 and $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$ as well, lie within the 5′-terminal half of the 16 S RNA molecule. In particular, the S4 binding site was localized to the first 500 nucleotides of this sequence while that for S15 lies within a 140-nucleotide sequence starting about 600 nucleotides from the 5′-terminus. The binding site for the protein S7 lies between 900 and 1500 nucleotides from the 5′-terminus of the ribosomal RNA.     

Localization of the binding site for protein S4 on 16 S ribosomal RNA by chemical and enzymatic probing and primer extension

We have examined the effect of binding ribosomal protein S4 to 16 S rRNA on the susceptibility of the RNA to a variety of chemical and enzymatic probes. We have used dimethyl sulfate to probe unpaired adenines (at N-1) and cytosines (at N-3), kethoxal to probe unpaired guanines (at N-1 and N-2) and cobra venom (V1) ribonuclease as a probe of base-paired regions of 16 S rRNA. Sites of attack by the probes were identified by primer extension using synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides. Comparison of probing results for naked and S4-bound rRNA shows: Protein S4 protects a relatively compact region of the 5' domain of 16 S rRNA from chemical and enzymatic attack. This region is bounded by nucleotides 27 to 47 and 394 to 556, and has a secondary structure characterized by the junction of five helical elements. Phylogenetically conserved irregular features (bulged nucleotides, internal loops and flanking unpaired nucleotides) and helical phosphodiester bonds of four of the helices are specifically protected in the S4-RNA complex. We conclude that this is the major, and possibly sole region of contact between 16 S rRNA and S4. Many of the S4-dependent changes mimic those observed on assembly of 16 S rRNA into 30 S ribosomal subunits. Binding of S4 causes enhanced chemical reactivity coupled with protection from V1 nuclease outside the S4 junction region in the 530, 720 and 1140 loops. We interpret these results as indicative of loss of structure, and suggest that S4 binding causes disruption of adventitious pairing in these regions, possibly by stabilizing the geometry of the RNA such that these interactions are prevented from forming.     

A method of preparing Escherichia coli 16 S RNA possessing previously unobserved 30 S ribosomal protein binding sites

A method of preparing 16 S RNA has been developed which yields RNA capable of binding specifically at least 12, and possibly 13, 30 S ribosomal proteins. This RNA, prepared by precipitation from 30 S subunits using a mixture of acetic acid and urea, is able to form stable complexes with proteins S3, S5, S9, S12, S13, S18 and possibly S11. In addition, this RNA has not been impaired in its capacity to interact with proteins S4, S7, S8, S15, S17 and S20, which are proteins that most other workers have shown to bind RNA prepared by the traditional phenol extraction procedure (Held et al., 1974; Garrett et al., 1971; Schaup et al., 1970,1971).We have applied several criteria of specificity to the binding of proteins to 16 S RNA prepared by the acetic acid-urea method. First, the new set of proteins interacts only with acetic acid-urea 16 S RNA and not with 16 S RNA prepared by the phenol method or with 23 S RNA prepared by the acetic acid-urea procedure. Second, 50 S ribosomal proteins do not interact with acetic acidurea 16 S RNA but do bind to 23 S RNA. Third, in the case of protein S9, we have shown that the bound protein co-sediments with acetic acid-urea 16 S RNA in a sucrose gradient. Additionally, a saturation binding experiment showed that approximately one mole of protein S9 binds acetic acid-urea 16 S RNA at saturation. Thus, we conclude that the method employed for the preparation of 16 S RNA greatly influences the ability of the RNA to form specific protein complexes. The significance of these results is discussed with regard to the in vitro assembly sequence.     

Evidence for tertiary structural RNA-RNA interactions within the protein S4 binding site at the 5''-end of 16S ribosomal RNA of Escherichia coli.+.

Evidence is presented for tertiary structural interaction(s) (interactions(s) between two regions of an RNA molecule that are widely separated in the RNA sequence) within the 5'-one third of the 16S ribosomal RNA of Escherichia coli that constitutes the binding site of protein S4. The two main interacting RNA regions were separated by about 120 nucleotides (sections Q to M) of the 16S RNA sequence. A second, smaller gap, of 13 nucleotides, occurred within section C". The two main interacting regions contain about 150 nucleotides (sections H" to Q) and 160 nucleotides (sections M to C"). They are folded back on one another and, especially in the presence of protein S4, are strongly protected against ribonuclease digestion. The intermediate region (sections Q to M), however, is relatively accessible to ribonucleases in the S4-RNP. By partial removal of subfragments from the RNA complex it was possible to localise the two main interacting sites within sections H" - H and sections I" - C". Three main criteria for the specificity of the RNA-RNA interactions were invoked and satisfied. The possibility of other tertiary structural RNA-RNA interactions occurring in other regions of the 16S RNA is discussed. Finally, all the structural information on the S4-RNP is summarised and a tentative model is proposed.     

Differences in physical and biological properties of 50S ribosomes and 23S RNAs derived from tight and loose couple 70S ribosomes

Tight couple (TC) 50S ribosomes on treatment with kethoxal lose their capacity to associate with 30S ribosomes whereas loose couple (LC) 50S ribosomes on such treatment fully retain their association capacity. The same is true for 23S RNAs isolated from treated 50S ribosomes or isolated 23S RNAs directly treated with kethoxal, so far as their capacity to associate with 16S RNA is concerned. At certain Mg++ concentrations TC 23S RNA is highly susceptible to the nucleolytic action of single-strand specific enzyme RNase I; LC 23S RNA is quite resistant. The Mg++-dependencies of the two species of 23S RNAs for association with 16S RNA are also quite different. The fluorescence enhancement of ethidium bromide due to binding to TC 23S RNA is slightly less than LC 23S RNA. The hyperchromicity of LC 23S RNA due to thermal denaturation is somewhat more than TC 23S RNA. LC 23S RNA has slightly more elliptic CD spectrum than TC 23S RNA. These results clearly show that 23S RNAs present in TC and LC 50S ribosomes are distinct from each other. It has been recently demonstrated in this laboratory that they can be interconverted by the agents involved in translocation and thus appear to be conformomers.     

Protection of specific sites in 23 S and 5 S RNA from chemical modification by association of 30 S and 50 S ribosomes.

The effect of 30S subunit attachment on the accessibility of specific sites in 5 S and 23 S RNA in 50 S ribosomal subunits was studied by means of the guanine-specific reagent kethoxal. Oligonucleotides surrounding the sites of kethoxal substitution were resolved and quantitated by diagonal electrophoresis. In contrast to the extensive protection of sites in 16 S RNA in 70 S ribosomes (Chapman &; Noller, 1977), only two strongly (approx. 90%) protected sites were detected in 23 S RNA. The nucleotide sequences at these sites are

in which the indicated kethoxal-reactive guanines (with K above them) are strongly protected by association of 30 S and 50 S subunits. The latter sequence has the potential to base-pair with nucleotides 816 to 821 of the 16 S RNA, a site which has been shown to be protected from kethoxal by 50 S subunits and essential for subunit association. Six additional sites in 23 S RNA are partially (30 to 50%) protected by 30 S subunits. One of these sequences,

is complementary to nucleotides 787 to 792 of 16 S RNA. a site which is also 50 S-protected and essential for association. Of the two kethoxal-reactive 5 S RNA sites in 50 S subunits, G₁₃ is partially protected in 70 S ribosomes. while G₄₁ remains unaffected by subunit association.The relatively small number of kethoxal-reactive sites in 23 S RNA that is strongly protected in 70 S ribosomes suggests that subunit association may involve contacts between single-stranded sites in 16 S RNA and 50 S subunit proteins or non-Watson-Crick interactions with 23 S RNA. in addition to the two suggested base-paired contacts.     

Central domain assembly: thermodynamics and kinetics of S6 and S18 binding to an S15-RNA complex

The 30 S ribosomal subunit assembles in vitro through the hierarchical binding of 21 ribosomal proteins to 16 S rRNA. The central domain of 16 S rRNA becomes the platform of the 30 S subunit upon binding of ribosomal proteins S6, S8, S11, S15, S18 and S21. The assembly of the platform is nucleated by binding of S15 to 16 S rRNA, followed by the cooperative binding of S6 and S18. The prior binding of S6 and S18 is required for binding of S11 and S21. We have studied the mechanism of the cooperative binding of S6 and S18 to the S15-rRNA complex by isothermal titration calorimetry and gel mobility shift assays with rRNA and proteins from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus. S6 and S18 form a stable heterodimer in solution with an apparent dissociation constant of 8.7 nM at 40 degrees C. The S6:S18 heterodimer binds to the S15-rRNA complex with an equilibrium dissociation constant of 2.7 nM at 40 degrees C. Consistent with previous studies using rRNA and proteins from Escherichia coli, we observed no binding of S6 or S18 in the absence of the other protein or S15. The presence of S15 increases the affinity of S6:S18 for the RNA by at least four orders of magnitude. The kinetics of S6:S18 binding to the S15-rRNA complex are slow, with an apparent bimolecular rate constant of 8.0 x 10(4) M(-1) s(-1) and an apparent unimolecular dissociation rate of 1.6 x 10(-4) s(-1). These results, which are consistent with a model in which S6 and S18 bind as a heterodimer to the S15-rRNA complex, provide a mechanistic framework to describe the previously observed S15-mediated cooperative binding of S6 and S18 in the ordered assembly of a multi-protein ribonucleoprotein complex.     

Characterization of a novel association between two trypanosome-specific proteins and 5S rRNA

P34 and P37 are two previously identified RNA binding proteins in the flagellate protozoan Trypanosoma brucei. RNA interference studies have determined that the proteins are essential and are involved in ribosome biogenesis. Here, we show that these proteins interact in vitro with the 5S rRNA with nearly identical binding characteristics in the absence of other cellular factors. The T. brucei 5S rRNA has a complex secondary structure and presents four accessible loops (A to D) for interactions with RNA-binding proteins. In other eukaryotes, loop C is bound by the L5 ribosomal protein and loop A mainly by TFIIIA. The binding of P34 and P37 to T. brucei 5S rRNA involves the LoopA region of the RNA, but these proteins also protect the L5 binding site located on LoopC.     

Binding of Escherichia coli ribosomal proteins to 23S RNA under reconstitution conditions for the 50S subunit.

The RNA binding capacity of 50S proteins from E. coli ribosomes has been tested under improved conditions; purified proteins active in reconstitution assays were used, and the binding was studied under the conditions of the total reconstitution procedure for the 50S subunit. The results are: 1) Interaction of 23S RNA was found with 17 proteins, namely L1, L2, L3, L4, L7/L12, L9, L10, L11, L15, L16, L17, L18, L20, L22, L23, L24 and L29. 2) The proteins L1, L2, L3, L4, L9, L23 and L24 bound to 23S RNA at a level of about one copy per RNA molecule, whereas L20 could bind more than one copy (no saturation was observed at 1.8 copies per 23S RNA), and the other proteins bound 0.2--0.6 copies per RNA. 3) L1, L3, L7/L12 showed a slight binding to 16S RNA, L26 (identical with S20) strong binding to 16S RNA. 4) The binding of L2, L7/L12, L10, L11, L15, L16 and L18 was preparation sensitive, i.e. the binding ability changed notably from preparation to preparation. 5) All proteins bound equally well to 23S RNA in presence of 4 and 20 mM Mg2+, respectively, except L2, L3, L4, L7/L12, L9, L10, L15, L16 and L18, which bound less strongly at 20 mM than at 4 mM Mg2+.     

Binding sites of E. coli and B. stearothermophilus ribosomal proteins on B stearothermophilus 5S RNA.

The primary binding sites for Bacillus stearothermophilus proteins B-L5 and B-L22 and the Escherichia coli proteins E-L5, E-L18 and E-L25 on B. stearothermophilus 5S RNA were determined by limited ribonuclease digestion of the corresponding 5S RNA-protein complexes. The results obtained in this study are in agreement with our previous experiments in which the binding sites of E. coli and B. stearothermophilus proteins were determined for E. coli 5S RNA and lead to the conclusion that the proteins interact with the most conserved regions of 5S RNA. A comparison of the results obtained in this study with those of other published experiments suggest that the proposed interaction of nucleotides 16-21 with those of 58-63 is facilitated by protein binding to 5S RNA.     

Further evidence that the ribosomal 30S proteins S3, S5, S9, S11, S12, and S18 possess specific 16S RNA binding sites

Summary E. coli ribosomal 16S RNA preparted by an acetic acid-urea extraction technique individually binds, in addition to the seven established proteins, 6 new 30S ribosomal proteins (S3, S5, S9, S12, S18 and S11) (Hochkeppel et al., 1976). In this communication we demonstrate the site specificity of these proteins. Binding curves of the individual proteins with acetic acid-urea 16S RNA show that the binding of all six proteins to the RNA reaches a plateau at 0.3–0.97 copies per 16S RNA molecule. No significant binding of these proteins to classical phenol extracted 16S RNA is observed, with the exception of S13 which binds 0.2 copies of protein per molecule of 16S RNA. Specificity of binding of these proteins is also demonstrated in chase experiments. The site specificity of individual [³H]-labeled 30S proteins bound to 16S RNA is tested by the addition of non-radioactive 30S total protein to the reaction mixture.     

Effects of bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A, S protein, and S peptide on activation of purified rat hepatic glucocorticoid-receptor complexes

Bovine pancreatic ribonuclease (RNase) A and S protein (enzymatically inactive proteolytic fragment of RNase A which contains RNA binding site) stimulate the activation, as evidenced by increasing DNA-cellulose binding, of highly purified rat hepatic glucocorticoid-receptor complexes. These effects are dose dependent with maximal stimulation of DNA-cellulose binding being detected at approximately 500 micrograms (50 units of RNase A/mL). RNase A and S protein do not enhance DNA-cellulose binding via their ability to interact directly with DNA or to increase nonspecific binding of receptors to cellulose. Neither S peptide (enzymatically inactive proteolytic fragment which lacks RNA binding site) nor cytochrome c, a nonspecific basic DNA binding protein, mimics these effects. RNase A and S protein do not stimulate the conformational change which is associated with activation and is reflected in a shift in the elution profile of receptor complexes from DEAE-cellulose. In contrast, these two proteins interact with previously heat-activated receptor complexes to further enhance their DNA-cellulose binding capacity and thus mimic the effects of an endogenous heat-stable cytoplasmic protein(s) which also function(s) during step 2 of in vitro activation [Schmidt, T. J., Miller-Diener, A., Webb, M. L., & Litwack, G. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 16255-16262]. Preadsorption of RNase A and S protein to an RNase affinity resin containing an inhibitory RNA analogue, or trypsin digestion of the RNA binding site within S protein, eliminates the subsequent ability of these two proteins to stimulate DNA-cellulose binding of the purified receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Neutron scattering study of the 13 S fragment of 16 S RNA and its complex with ribosomal protein S4

A fragment with a molecular weight of 170,000 and a sedimentation coefficient of 13 S which is capable of specifically binding ribosomal protein S4 has been obtained by digestion of Escherichia coli 16 S RNA with ribonuclease A. The 13 S fragment of 16 S RNA and its complex with protein S4 have been studied by different physical methods; in the first place, by neutron scattering. It has been shown that this fragment is very compact in solution. The radii of gyration of this fragment (50 ± 3 Å) and of protein S4 within the complex (17 ± 3 Å) coincide, within the limits of experimental error, with the radii of gyration for the free RNA fragment (47 ± 2 Å) and the free ribosomal protein S4 in solution (18 ± 2 Å). Hence the conclusion is drawn that the compactness of the RNA fragment and the ribosomal protein does not change on complex formation. The compact 13 S fragment of 16 S RNA is shown to be contrast-matched in solvent containing 70% ²H₂O which corresponds to a value for the partial specific volume of RNA of 0.537 cm³/g.     

The 16S rRNA binding site of Thermus thermophilus ribosomal protein S15: comparison with Escherichia coli S15, minimum site and structure.

Binding of Escherichia coli and Thermus thermophilus ribosomal proteins S15 to a 16S ribosomal RNA fragment from T. thermophilus (nt 559-753) has been investigated in detail by extensive deletion analysis, filter-binding assays, gel mobility shift, structure probing, footprinting with chemical, enzymatic, and hydroxyl radical probes. Both S15 proteins recognize two distinct sites. The first one maps in the bottom of helix 638-655/717-734 (H22) and in the three-way junction between helix 560-570/737-747 (H20), helix 571-600/606-634 (H21), and H22. The second is located in a conserved purine-rich region in the center of H22. The first site provides a higher contribution to the free energy of binding than the second one, and both are required for efficient binding. A short RNA fragment of 56 nt containing these elements binds S15 with high affinity. The structure of the rRNA is constrained by the three-way junction and requires both magnesium and S15 to be stabilized. A 3D model, derived by computer modeling with the use of experimental data, suggests that the bound form adopts a Y-shaped conformation, with a quasi-coaxial stacking of H22 on H20, and H21 forming an acute angle with H22. In this model, S15 binds to the shallow groove of the RNA on the exterior side of the Y-shaped structure, making contact with the two sites, which are separated by one helix turn.