Analysis of the Viral Elements Required in the Nuclear Import of HIV-1 DNA

HIV-1 possesses an exquisite ability to infect cells independently from their cycling status by undergoing an active phase of nuclear import through the nuclear pore. This property has been ascribed to the presence of karyophilic elements present in viral nucleoprotein complexes, such as the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a cis-acting structure present in the newly synthesized DNA, the DNA flap. However, their role in nuclear import remains controversial at best. In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the role of these elements in nuclear import in a comparison between several primary cell types, including stimulated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We show that despite the fact that none of these elements is absolutely required for nuclear import, disruption of the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS) clearly affects the kinetics of viral DNA entry into the nucleus. This effect is independent of the cell cycle status of the target cells and is observed in cycling as well as in nondividing primary cells, suggesting that nuclear import of viral DNA may occur similarly under both conditions. Nonetheless, this study indicates that other components are utilized along with the cPPT-CTS for an efficient entry of viral DNA into the nucleus.Lentiviruses display an exquisite ability to infect dividing and nondividing cells alike that is unequalled among Retroviridae. This property is thought to be due to the particular behavior or composition of the viral nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) that are liberated into the cytoplasm of target cells upon virus-to-cell membrane fusion and that allow lentiviruses to traverse an intact nuclear membrane (17, 28, 29, 39, 52, 55, 67, 79). In the case of the human immunodeficiency type I virus (HIV-1), several studies over the years identified viral components of such structures with intrinsic karyophilic properties and thus perfect candidates for mediation of the passage of viral DNA (vDNA) through the nuclear pore: the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a three-stranded DNA flap, a structure present in neo-synthesized viral DNA, specified by the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS). It is clear that these elements may mediate nuclear import directly or via the recruitment of the host''s proteins, and indeed, several cellular proteins have been found to influence HIV-1 infection during nuclear import, like the karyopherin α2 Rch1 (38); importin 7 (3, 30, 93); the transportin SR-2 (13, 20); or the nucleoporins Nup98 (27), Nup358/RANBP2, and Nup153 (13, 56).More recently, the capsid protein (CA), the main structural component of viral nucleoprotein complexes at least upon their cytoplasmic entry, has also been suggested to be involved in nuclear import or in postnuclear entry steps (14, 25, 74, 90, 92). Whether this is due to a role for CA in the shaping of viral nucleoprotein complexes or to a direct interaction between CA and proteins involved in nuclear import remains at present unknown.Despite a large number of reports, no single viral or cellular element has been described as absolutely necessary or sufficient to mediate lentiviral nuclear import, and important controversies as to the experimental evidences linking these elements to this step exist. For example, MA was among the first viral protein of HIV-1 described to be involved in nuclear import, and 2 transferable nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been described to occur at its N and C termini (40). However, despite the fact that early studies indicated that the mutation of these NLSs perturbed HIV-1 nuclear import and infection specifically in nondividing cells, such as macrophages (86), these findings failed to be confirmed in more-recent studies (23, 33, 34, 57, 65, 75).Similarly, Vpr has been implicated by several studies of the nuclear import of HIV-1 DNA (1, 10, 21, 43, 45, 47, 64, 69, 72, 73, 85). Vpr does not possess classical NLSs, yet it displays a transferable nucleophilic activity when fused to heterologous proteins (49-51, 53, 77, 81) and has been shown to line onto the nuclear envelope (32, 36, 47, 51, 58), where it can truly facilitate the passage of the viral genome into the nucleus. However, the role of Vpr in this step remains controversial, as in some instances Vpr is not even required for viral replication in nondividing cells (1, 59).Conflicting results concerning the role of IN during HIV-1 nuclear import also exist. Indeed, several transferable NLSs have been described to occur in the catalytic core and the C-terminal DNA binding domains of IN, but for some of these, initial reports of nuclear entry defects (2, 9, 22, 46, 71) were later shown to result from defects at steps other than nuclear import (60, 62, 70, 83). These reports do not exclude a role for the remaining NLSs in IN during nuclear import, and they do not exclude the possibility that IN may mediate this step by associating with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as importin alpha and beta (41), importin 7 (3, 30, 93, 98), and, more recently, transportin-SR2 (20).The central DNA flap, a structure present in lentiviruses and in at least 1 yeast retroelement (44), but not in other orthoretroviruses, has also been involved in the nuclear import of viral DNA (4, 6, 7, 31, 78, 84, 95, 96), and more recently, it has been proposed to provide a signal for viral nucleoprotein complexes uncoating in the proximity of the nuclear pore, with the consequence of providing a signal for import (8). However, various studies showed an absence or weakness of nuclear entry defects in viruses devoid of the DNA flap (24, 26, 44, 61).Overall, the importance of viral factors in HIV-1 nuclear import is still unclear. The discrepancies concerning the role of MA, IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS in HIV-1 nuclear import could in part be explained by their possible redundancy. To date, only one comprehensive study analyzed the role of these four viral potentially karyophilic elements together (91). This study showed that an HIV-1 chimera where these elements were either deleted or replaced by their murine leukemia virus (MLV) counterparts was, in spite of an important infectivity defect, still able to infect cycling and cell cycle-arrested cell lines to similar efficiencies. If this result indicated that the examined viral elements of HIV-1 were dispensable for the cell cycle independence of HIV, as infections proceeded equally in cycling and arrested cells, they did not prove that they were not required in nuclear import, because chimeras displayed a severe infectivity defect that precluded their comparison with the wild type (WT).Nuclear import and cell cycle independence may not be as simply linked as previously thought. On the one hand, there has been no formal demonstration that the passage through the nuclear pore, and thus nuclear import, is restricted to nondividing cells, and for what we know, this passage may be an obligatory step in HIV infection in all cells, irrespective of their cycling status. In support of this possibility, certain mutations in viral elements of HIV affect nuclear import in dividing as well as in nondividing cells (4, 6, 7, 31, 84, 95). On the other hand, cell cycle-independent infection may be a complex phenomenon that is made possible not only by the ability of viral DNA to traverse the nuclear membrane but also by its ability to cope with pre- and postnuclear entry events, as suggested by the phenotypes of certain CA mutants (74, 92).Given that the cellular environment plays an important role during the early steps of viral infection, we chose to analyze the role of the four karyophilic viral elements of HIV-1 during infection either alone or combined in a wide comparison between cells highly susceptible to infection and more-restrictive primary cell targets of HIV-1 in vivo, such as primary blood lymphocytes (PBLs), monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), and dendritic cells (DCs).In this study, we show that an HIV-1-derived virus in which the 2 NLSs of MA are mutated and the IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS elements are removed displays no detectable nuclear import defect in HeLa cells independently of their cycling status. However, this mutant virus is partially impaired for nuclear entry in primary cells and more specifically in DCs and PBLs. We found that this partial defect is specified by the cPPT-CTS, while the 3 remaining elements seem to play no role in nuclear import. Thus, our study indicates that the central DNA flap specifies the most important role among the viral elements involved thus far in nuclear import. However, it also clearly indicates that the role played by the central DNA flap is not absolute and that its importance varies depending on the cell type, independently from the dividing status of the cell.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Quantitative Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy Analysis of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag-Gag Interaction: Relative Contributions of the CA and NC Domains and Membrane Binding

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 structural polyprotein Pr55^Gag is necessary and sufficient for the assembly of virus-like particles on cellular membranes. Previous studies demonstrated the importance of the capsid C-terminal domain (CA-CTD), nucleocapsid (NC), and membrane association in Gag-Gag interactions, but the relationships between these factors remain unclear. In this study, we systematically altered the CA-CTD, NC, and the ability to bind membrane to determine the relative contributions of, and interplay between, these factors. To directly measure Gag-Gag interactions, we utilized chimeric Gag-fluorescent protein fusion constructs and a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) stoichiometry method. We found that the CA-CTD is essential for Gag-Gag interactions at the plasma membrane, as the disruption of the CA-CTD has severe impacts on FRET. Data from experiments in which wild-type (WT) and CA-CTD mutant Gag molecules are coexpressed support the idea that the CA-CTD dimerization interface consists of two reciprocal interactions. Mutations in NC have less-severe impacts on FRET between normally myristoylated Gag proteins than do CA-CTD mutations. Notably, when nonmyristoylated Gag interacts with WT Gag, NC is essential for FRET despite the presence of the CA-CTD. In contrast, constitutively enhanced membrane binding eliminates the need for NC to produce a WT level of FRET. These results from cell-based experiments suggest a model in which both membrane binding and NC-RNA interactions serve similar scaffolding functions so that one can functionally compensate for a defect in the other.The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) structural precursor polyprotein Pr55^Gag is necessary and sufficient for the assembly of virus-like particles (VLPs). Gag is composed of four major structural domains, matrix (MA), capsid (CA), nucleocapsid (NC), and p6, as well as two spacer peptides, SP1 and SP2 (3, 30, 94). Following particle assembly and release, cleavage by HIV-1 protease separates these domains. However, these domains must work together in the context of the full-length Gag polyprotein to drive particle assembly.Previous studies have mapped two major functional domains involved in the early steps of assembly: first, Gag associates with cellular membranes via basic residues and N-terminal myristoylation of the MA domain (10, 17, 20, 35, 39, 87, 91, 106); second, the Gag-Gag interaction domains that span the CA C-terminal domain (CA-CTD) and NC domain promote Gag multimerization (3, 11, 14, 16, 18, 23, 27, 29, 30, 33, 36, 46, 64, 88, 94, 102, 103). Structural and genetic studies have identified two residues (W184 and M185) within a dimerization interface in the CA-CTD that are critical to CA-CA interactions (33, 51, 74, 96). Analytical ultracentrifugation of heterodimers formed between wild-type (WT) Gag and Gag mutants with changes at these residues suggests that the dimerization interface consists of two reciprocal interactions, one of which can be disrupted to form a “half-interface” (22).In addition to the CA-CTD, NC contributes to assembly via 15 basic residues (8, 9, 11, 14, 18, 23, 25, 28, 34, 40, 43, 54, 57, 58, 74, 79, 88, 97, 104, 105), although some researchers have suggested that NC instead contributes to the stability of mature virions after assembly (75, 98, 99). It is thought that the contribution of NC to assembly is due to its ability to bind RNA, since the addition of RNA promotes the formation of particles in vitro (14-16, 37, 46), and RNase treatment disrupts Gag-Gag interactions (11) and immature viral cores (67). However, RNA is not necessary per se, since dimerization motifs can substitute for NC (1, 4, 19, 49, 105). This suggests a model in which RNA serves a structural role, such as a scaffold, to promote Gag-Gag interactions through NC. Based on in vitro studies, it has been suggested that this RNA scaffolding interaction facilitates the low-order Gag multimerization mediated by CA-CTD dimerization (4, 37, 49, 62, 63, 85). Despite a wealth of biochemical data, the relative contributions of the CA-CTD and NC to Gag multimerization leading to assembly are yet to be determined in cells.Mutations in Gag interaction domains alter membrane binding in addition to affecting Gag multimerization. In particular, mutations or truncations of CA reduce membrane binding (21, 74, 82), and others previously reported that mutations or truncations of NC affect membrane binding (13, 78, 89, 107). These findings are consistent with a myristoyl switch model of membrane binding in which Gag can switch between high- and low-membrane-affinity states (38, 71, 76, 83, 86, 87, 92, 95, 107). Many have proposed, and some have provided direct evidence (95), that Gag multimerization mediated by CA or NC interactions promotes the exposure of the myristoyl moiety to facilitate membrane associations.Gag membrane binding and multimerization appear to be interrelated steps of virus assembly, since membrane binding also facilitates Gag multimerization. Unlike betaretroviruses that fully assemble prior to membrane targeting and envelopment (type B/D), lentiviruses, such as HIV, assemble only on cellular membranes at normal Gag expression levels (type C), although non-membrane-bound Gag complexes exist (45, 58, 60, 61, 65). Consistent with this finding, mutations that reduce Gag membrane associations cause a defect in Gag multimerization (59, 74). Therefore, in addition to their primary effects on Gag-Gag interactions, mutations in Gag interaction domains cause a defect in membrane binding, which, in turn, causes a secondary multimerization defect. To determine the relative contributions of the CA-CTD and the NC domain to Gag-Gag interactions at the plasma membrane, it is essential to eliminate secondary effects due to a modulation of membrane binding.Except for studies using a His-tag-mediated membrane binding system (5, 46), biochemical studies of C-type Gag multimerization typically lack membranes. Therefore, these studies do not fully represent particle assembly, which occurs on biological membranes in cells. Furthermore, many biochemical and structural approaches are limited to isolated domains or truncated Gag constructs. Thus, some of these studies are perhaps more relevant to the behavior of protease-cleaved Gag in mature virions. With few exceptions (47, 74), cell-based studies of Gag multimerization have typically been limited to measuring how well mutant Gag is incorporated into VLPs when coexpressed or not with WT Gag. Since VLP production is a complex multistep process, effects of mutations on other steps in the process can confound this indirect measure. For example, NC contributes to VLP production by both promoting multimerization and interacting with the host factor ALIX to promote VLP release (26, 80). To directly assay Gag multimerization in cells, several groups (24, 45, 52, 56) developed microscopy assays based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). These assays measure the transfer of energy between donor and acceptor fluorescent molecules that are brought within ∼5 nm by the association of the proteins to which they are attached (41, 48, 90). However, these microscopy-based Gag FRET assays have not been used to fully elucidate several fundamental aspects of HIV-1 Gag multimerization at the plasma membrane of cells, such as the relative contributions of the CA-CTD and NC and the effect of membrane binding on Gag-Gag interactions. In this study, we used a FRET stoichiometry method based on calibrated spectral analysis of fluorescence microscopy images (41). This algorithm determines the fractions of both donor and acceptor fluorescent protein-tagged Gag molecules participating in FRET. For cells expressing Gag molecules tagged with donor (cyan fluorescent protein [CFP]) and acceptor (yellow fluorescent protein [YFP]) molecules, this method measures the apparent FRET efficiency, which is proportional to the mole fraction of Gag constructs in complex. By measuring apparent FRET efficiencies, quantitative estimates of the mole fractions of interacting proteins can be obtained.Using this FRET-based assay, we aim to answer two questions: (i) what are the relative contributions of CA-CTD and NC domains to Gag multimerization when secondary effects via membrane binding are held constant, and (ii) what is the effect of modulating membrane binding on the ability of Gag mutants to interact with WT Gag?Our data demonstrate that the CA-CTD dimerization interface is essential for Gag multimerization at the plasma membrane, as fully disrupting the CA-CTD interaction abolishes FRET, whereas a modest level of FRET is still detected in the absence of NC. We also present evidence that the CA-CTD dimerization interface consists of two reciprocal interactions, allowing the formation of a half-interface that can still contribute to Gag multimerization. Notably, when Gag derivatives with an intact CA-CTD were coexpressed with WT Gag, either membrane binding ability or NC was required for the Gag mutants to interact with WT Gag, suggesting functional compensation between these factors.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.