Vp1659 Is a Vibrio parahaemolyticus Type III Secretion System 1 Protein That Contributes to Translocation of Effector Proteins Needed To Induce Cytolysis,Autophagy, and Disruption of Actin Structure in HeLa Cells

Vibrio parahaemolyticus harbors two type III secretion systems (T3SSs; T3SS1 and T3SS2), of which T3SS1 is involved in host cell cytotoxicity. T3SS1 expression is positively regulated by ExsA, and it is negatively regulated by ExsD. We compared the secretion profiles of a wild-type strain (NY-4) of V. parahaemolyticus with those of an ExsD deletion mutant (ΔexsD) and with a strain of NY-4 that overexpresses T3SS1 (NY-4:pexsA). From this comparison, we detected a previously uncharacterized protein, Vp1659, which shares some sequence homology with LcrV from Yersinia. We show that vp1659 expression is positively regulated by ExsA and is negatively regulated by ExsD. Vp1659 is specifically secreted by T3SS1 of V. parahaemolyticus, and Vp1659 is not required for the successful extracellular secretion of another T3SS1 protein, Vp1656. Mechanical fractionation showed that Vp1659 is translocated into HeLa cells in a T3SS1-dependent manner and that deletion of Vp1659 does not prevent VopS from being translocated into HeLa cells during infection. Deletion of vp1659 significantly reduces cytotoxicity when HeLa cells are infected by V. parahaemolyticus, while complementation of the Δvp1659 strain restores cytotoxicity. Differential staining showed that Vp1659 is required to induce membrane permeability in HeLa cells. We also show evidence that Vp1659 is required for actin rearrangement and the induction of autophagy. On the basis of these data, we conclude that Vp1659 is a T3SS1-associated protein that is a component of the secretion apparatus and that it is necessary for the efficient translocation of effector proteins into epithelial cells.As a marine pathogen, Vibrio parahaemolyticus is frequently isolated from seafood products such as oysters and shrimp (19, 45). The main symptoms of V. parahaemolyticus infection in humans include diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. In addition to the gastrointestinal infection, necrotizing fasciitis and septic shock are reportedly associated with V. parahaemolyticus infection (37). V. parahaemolyticus can also cause wound infections after contact with contaminated water (6, 7, 16, 37).V. parahaemolyticus is able to adhere to and invade epithelial cells (1, 38, 43). Pili are involved in the adherence to the intestinal epithelium (32), but it is not clear what factors are required for V. parahaemolyticus to invade epithelial cells. Hemolysins are considered primary factors involved in the pathogenesis of V. parahaemolyticus. For example, a thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh) mutant strain loses the ability to cause fluid accumulation in the intestinal lumen (33), while deletion of a tdh-related gene (trh) results in the complete loss of hemolysis and the partial loss of fluid accumulation in a rabbit intestinal ligation model (42). Recent studies show that the disruption of epithelial tight junctions, which is a hallmark of bacterial dissemination into the circulatory system and subsequent septicemia, is independent of the thermostable direct hemolysin, suggesting that additional factors are required for the pathogenesis of V. parahaemolyticus (27).A broad range of Gram-negative bacteria employ type III secretion systems (T3SSs) to export virulence-related proteins into the extracellular milieu and/or to deliver these proteins directly into host cells (5, 12, 13). T3SSs are composed of three parts: a secretion apparatus, translocators, and effectors (17, 18). The secretion apparatus and translocators are encoded by ca. 25 genes that are conserved and usually located in a genomic island. Genes that encode effectors are less conserved and can be found distal from the T3SS islands. The secretion apparatus serves to secrete both effectors and translocators from bacterial cells, and translocators help the effectors cross into the eukaryotic cells, where they can disrupt normal host cell signal functions.Two distinct T3SSs (T3SS1 and T3SS2) were identified in the genome of V. parahaemolyticus (28). On the basis of the sequence similarity and gene organization, T3SS1 was classified as a member of the Ysc family of secretion systems, while T3SS2 was classified as a member of the Inv-Mxi-Spa family (40). Functional analysis shows that deletion of T3SS1 decreases cytotoxicity against HeLa cells, while deletion of T3SS2 diminishes intestinal fluid accumulation (35). Interestingly, in some strains, T3SS2 can be involved in the cytotoxic effect specifically against Caco-2 and HCT-8 cells (23). One study showed that T3SS1 of V. parahaemolyticus induces autophagy, but blocking autophagy does not completely mitigate cytotoxicity, indicating that other T3SS1-induced mechanisms contribute to cell death (3, 4). Recent work from our laboratory showed that V. parahaemolyticus induces cell rounding, pore formation, and membrane damage, consistent with the induction of an oncosis pathway (46). Importantly, treatment of infected cells with an osmoprotectant (polyethylene glycol 3350) significantly reduced cytotoxicity, indicating that oncosis is the primary mechanism by which T3SS1 of V. parahaemolyticus causes cell death for in vitro cultures (46). Nevertheless, it is unknown which effector protein(s) is involved in cell cytotoxicity. By comparing the secretion protein profiles of wild-type and T3SS1 mutant strains, four T3SS1 proteins have been identified (34). Among these, Vp1680 is translocated into host cells and is required for the induction of autophagy during infection of HeLa cells (3, 34). Recent studies showed that VopS is able to prevent the interaction of Rho GTPase with its downstream factors by a new modification mechanism, called AMPylation (44), and this prevents the assembly of actin fibers. Two proteins (VopT and VopL) have been identified as T3SS2 substrates (23, 26). VopT is a member of ADP-ribosyltransferase and is partially responsible for the cytotoxic effect specific to Caco-2 and HCT-8 cells (23). VopL induces the assembly of actin stress fibers (26) and is potentially responsible for the internalization of V. parahaemolyticus into Caco-2 cells (1). Many other potential effector proteins are encoded proximal to T3SS1 and T3SS2 apparatus genes, but these have not been functionally characterized. The function of structural genes has not been extensively studied for either T3SS1 or T3SS2 in V. parahaemolyticus.T3SSs are expressed after contact with host cells or when cells are grown under inducing conditions (17). Expression of T3SS1 in V. parahaemolyticus is induced when bacteria are grown in tissue culture medium (Dulbecco''s minimal essential medium [DMEM]), although the secretion of one substrate (Vp1656) was not detected under this condition, probably due to the low detection sensitivity (47). T3SS1 genes are not expressed when bacteria are grown in LB medium supplemented with 2.5% NaCl (LB-S). Disruption of the exsD gene or overexpression of exsA results in the constitutive expression of T3SS1 genes and the secretion of Vp1656 even when bacteria are grown in LB-S (47). For the present study, we took advantage of these regulatory mechanisms and compared the proteins secreted by the NY-4 (wild type), ΔexsD, ΔexsD::pexsD (exsD complement), and NY-4:pexsA strains. We identified two proteins (VopS and Vp1659) that are present in the supernatants of the ΔexsD and NY-4:pexsA strains but that are absent in the supernatants of the NY-4 and ΔexsD::pexsD strains. Herein we demonstrate that Vp1659 is secreted into the extracellular milieu and is translocated into HeLa cells by T3SS1. Functional analysis is consistent with the hypothesis that Vp1659 plays a role in actin rearrangement and induction of cytotoxicity and autophagy.     

An IcmF Family Protein,ImpLM, Is an Integral Inner Membrane Protein Interacting with ImpKL,and Its Walker A Motif Is Required for Type VI Secretion System-Mediated Hcp Secretion in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

An intracellular multiplication F (IcmF) family protein is a conserved component of a newly identified type VI secretion system (T6SS) encoded in many animal and plant-associated Proteobacteria. We have previously identified ImpL_M, an IcmF family protein that is required for the secretion of the T6SS substrate hemolysin-coregulated protein (Hcp) from the plant-pathogenic bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens. In this study, we characterized the topology of ImpL_M and the importance of its nucleotide-binding Walker A motif involved in Hcp secretion from A. tumefaciens. A combination of β-lactamase-green fluorescent protein fusion and biochemical fractionation analyses revealed that ImpL_M is an integral polytopic inner membrane protein comprising three transmembrane domains bordered by an N-terminal domain facing the cytoplasm and a C-terminal domain exposed to the periplasm. impL_M mutants with substitutions or deletions in the Walker A motif failed to complement the impL_M deletion mutant for Hcp secretion, which provided evidence that ImpL_M may bind and/or hydrolyze nucleoside triphosphates to mediate T6SS machine assembly and/or substrate secretion. Protein-protein interaction and protein stability analyses indicated that there is a physical interaction between ImpL_M and another essential T6SS component, ImpK_L. Topology and biochemical fractionation analyses suggested that ImpK_L is an integral bitopic inner membrane protein with an N-terminal domain facing the cytoplasm and a C-terminal OmpA-like domain exposed to the periplasm. Further comprehensive yeast two-hybrid assays dissecting ImpL_M-ImpK_L interaction domains suggested that ImpL_M interacts with ImpK_L via the N-terminal cytoplasmic domains of the proteins. In conclusion, ImpL_M interacts with ImpK_L, and its Walker A motif is required for its function in mediation of Hcp secretion from A. tumefaciens.Many pathogenic gram-negative bacteria employ protein secretion systems formed by macromolecular complexes to deliver proteins or protein-DNA complexes across the bacterial membrane. In addition to the general secretory (Sec) pathway (18, 52) and twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway (7, 34), which transport proteins across the inner membrane into the periplasm, at least six distinct protein secretion systems occur in gram-negative bacteria (28, 46, 66). These systems are able to secrete proteins from the cytoplasm or periplasm to the external environment or the host cell and include the well-documented type I to type V secretion systems (T1SS to T5SS) (10, 15, 23, 26, 30) and a recently discovered type VI secretion system (T6SS) (4, 8, 22, 41, 48, 49). These systems use ATPase or a proton motive force to energize assembly of the protein secretion machinery and/or substrate translocation (2, 6, 41, 44, 60).Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a soilborne pathogenic gram-negative bacterium that causes crown gall disease in a wide range of plants. Using an archetypal T4SS (9), A. tumefaciens translocates oncogenic transferred DNA and effector proteins to the host and ultimately integrates transferred DNA into the host genome. Because of its unique interkingdom DNA transfer, this bacterium has been extensively studied and used to transform foreign DNA into plants and fungi (11, 24, 40, 67). In addition to the T4SS, A. tumefaciens encodes several other secretion systems, including the Sec pathway, the Tat pathway, T1SS, T5SS, and the recently identified T6SS (72). T6SS is highly conserved and widely distributed in animal- and plant-associated Proteobacteria and plays an important role in the virulence of several human and animal pathogens (14, 19, 41, 48, 56, 63, 74). However, T6SS seems to play only a minor role or even a negative role in infection or virulence of the plant-associated pathogens or symbionts studied to date (5, 37-39, 72).T6SS was initially designated IAHP (IcmF-associated homologous protein) clusters (13). Before T6SS was documented by Pukatzki et al. in Vibrio cholerae (48), mutations in this gene cluster in the plant symbiont Rhizobium leguminosarum (5) and the fish pathogen Edwardsiella tarda (51) caused defects in protein secretion. In V. cholerae, T6SS was responsible for the loss of cytotoxicity for amoebae and for secretion of two proteins lacking a signal peptide, hemolysin-coregulated protein (Hcp) and valine-glycine repeat protein (VgrG). Secretion of Hcp is the hallmark of T6SS. Interestingly, mutation of hcp blocks the secretion of VgrG proteins (VgrG-1, VgrG-2, and VgrG-3), and, conversely, vgrG-1 and vgrG-2 are both required for secretion of the Hcp and VgrG proteins from V. cholerae (47, 48). Similarly, a requirement of Hcp for VgrG secretion and a requirement of VgrG for Hcp secretion have also been shown for E. tarda (74). Because Hcp forms a hexameric ring (41) stacked in a tube-like structure in vitro (3, 35) and VgrG has a predicted trimeric phage tail spike-like structure similar to that of the T4 phage gp5-gp27 complex (47), Hcp and VgrG have been postulated to form an extracellular translocon. This model is further supported by two recent crystallography studies showing that Hcp, VgrG, and a T4 phage gp25-like protein resembled membrane penetration tails of bacteriophages (35, 45).Little is known about the topology and structure of T6SS machinery subunits and the distinction between genes encoding machinery subunits and genes encoding regulatory proteins. Posttranslational regulation via the phosphorylation of Fha1 by a serine-threonine kinase (PpkA) is required for Hcp secretion from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (42). Genetic evidence for P. aeruginosa suggested that the T6SS may utilize a ClpV-like AAA⁺ ATPase to provide the energy for machinery assembly or substrate translocation (41). A recent study of V. cholerae suggested that ClpV ATPase activity is responsible for remodeling the VipA/VipB tubules which are crucial for type VI substrate secretion (6). An outer membrane lipoprotein, SciN, is an essential T6SS component for mediating Hcp secretion from enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (1). A systematic study of the T6SS machinery in E. tarda revealed that 13 of 16 genes in the evp gene cluster are essential for secretion of T6S substrates (74), which suggests the core components of the T6SS. Interestingly, most of the core components conserved in T6SS are predicted soluble proteins without recognizable signal peptide and transmembrane (TM) domains.The intracellular multiplication F (IcmF) and H (IcmH) proteins are among the few core components with obvious TM domains (8). In Legionella pneumophila Dot/Icm T4SSb, IcmF and IcmH are both membrane localized and partially required for L. pneumophila replication in macrophages (58, 70, 75). IcmF and IcmH are thought to interact with each other in stabilizing the T4SS complex in L. pneumophila (58). In T6SS, IcmF is one of the essential components required for secretion of Hcp from several animal pathogens, including V. cholerae (48), Aeromonas hydrophila (63), E. tarda (74), and P. aeruginosa (41), as well as the plant pathogens A. tumefaciens (72) and Pectobacterium atrosepticum (39). In E. tarda, IcmF (EvpO) interacted with IcmH (EvpN), EvpL, and EvpA in a yeast two-hybrid assay, and its putative nucleotide-binding site (Walker A motif) was not essential for secretion of T6SS substrates (74).In this study, we characterized the topology and interactions of the IcmF and IcmH family proteins ImpL_M and ImpK_L, which are two essential components of the T6SS of A. tumefaciens. We adapted the nomenclature proposed by Cascales (8), using the annotated gene designation followed by the letter indicated by Shalom et al. (59). Our data indicate that ImpL_M and ImpK_L are both integral inner membrane proteins and interact with each other via their N-terminal domains residing in the cytoplasm. We also provide genetic evidence showing that ImpL_M may function as a nucleoside triphosphate (NTP)-binding protein or nucleoside triphosphatase to mediate T6S machinery assembly and/or substrate secretion.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Cell-to-Cell Spread of the RNA Interference Response Suppresses Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) Infection of Mosquito Cell Cultures and Cannot Be Antagonized by SFV

In their vertebrate hosts, arboviruses such as Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Togaviridae) generally counteract innate defenses and trigger cell death. In contrast, in mosquito cells, following an early phase of efficient virus production, a persistent infection with low levels of virus production is established. Whether arboviruses counteract RNA interference (RNAi), which provides an important antiviral defense system in mosquitoes, is an important question. Here we show that in Aedes albopictus-derived mosquito cells, SFV cannot prevent the establishment of an antiviral RNAi response or prevent the spread of protective antiviral double-stranded RNA/small interfering RNA (siRNA) from cell to cell, which can inhibit the replication of incoming virus. The expression of tombusvirus siRNA-binding protein p19 by SFV strongly enhanced virus spread between cultured cells rather than virus replication in initially infected cells. Our results indicate that the spread of the RNAi signal contributes to limiting virus dissemination.In animals, RNA interference (RNAi) was first described for Caenorhabditis elegans (27). The production or introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in cells leads to the degradation of mRNAs containing homologous sequences by sequence-specific cleavage of mRNAs. Central to RNAi is the production of 21- to 26-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) from dsRNA and the assembly of an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), followed by the degradation of the target mRNA (23, 84). RNAi is a known antiviral strategy of plants (3, 53) and insects (21, 39, 51). Study of Drosophila melanogaster in particular has given important insights into RNAi responses against pathogenic viruses and viral RNAi inhibitors (31, 54, 83, 86, 91). RNAi is well characterized for Drosophila, and orthologs of antiviral RNAi genes have been found in Aedes and Culex spp. (13, 63).Arboviruses, or arthropod-borne viruses, are RNA viruses mainly of the families Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Togaviridae. The genus Alphavirus within the family Togaviridae contains several mosquito-borne pathogens: arboviruses such as Chikungunya virus (16) and equine encephalitis viruses (88). Replication of the prototype Sindbis virus and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is well understood (44, 71, 74, 79). Their genome consists of a positive-stranded RNA with a 5′ cap and a 3′ poly(A) tail. The 5′ two-thirds encodes the nonstructural polyprotein P1234, which is cleaved into four replicase proteins, nsP1 to nsP4 (47, 58, 60). The structural polyprotein is encoded in the 3′ one-third of the genome and cleaved into capsid and glycoproteins after translation from a subgenomic mRNA (79). Cytoplasmic replication complexes are associated with cellular membranes (71). Viruses mature by budding at the plasma membrane (35).In nature, arboviruses are spread by arthropod vectors (predominantly mosquitoes, ticks, flies, and midges) to vertebrate hosts (87). Little is known about how arthropod cells react to arbovirus infection. In mosquito cell cultures, an acute phase with efficient virus production is generally followed by the establishment of a persistent infection with low levels of virus production (9). This is fundamentally different from the cytolytic events following arbovirus interactions with mammalian cells and pathogenic insect viruses with insect cells. Alphaviruses encode host response antagonists for mammalian cells (2, 7, 34, 38).RNAi has been described for mosquitoes (56) and, when induced before infection, antagonizes arboviruses and their replicons (1, 4, 14, 15, 29, 30, 32, 42, 64, 65). RNAi is also functional in various mosquito cell lines (1, 8, 43, 49, 52). In the absence of RNAi, alphavirus and flavivirus replication and/or dissemination is enhanced in both mosquitoes and Drosophila (14, 17, 31, 45, 72). RNAi inhibitors weakly enhance SFV replicon replication in tick and mosquito cells (5, 33), posing the questions of how, when, and where RNAi interferes with alphavirus infection in mosquito cells.Here we use an A. albopictus-derived mosquito cell line to study RNAi responses to SFV. Using reporter-based assays, we demonstrate that SFV cannot avoid or efficiently inhibit the establishment of an RNAi response. We also demonstrate that the RNAi signal can spread between mosquito cells. SFV cannot inhibit cell-to-cell spread of the RNAi signal, and spread of the virus-induced RNAi signal (dsRNA/siRNA) can inhibit the replication of incoming SFV in neighboring cells. Furthermore, we show that SFV expression of a siRNA-binding protein increases levels of virus replication mainly by enhancing virus spread between cells rather than replication in initially infected cells. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel mechanism, cell-to-cell spread of antiviral dsRNA/siRNA, by which RNAi limits SFV dissemination in mosquito cells.     

DivIC Stabilizes FtsL against RasP Cleavage

The essential cell division protein FtsL is a substrate of the intramembrane protease RasP. Using heterologous coexpression experiments, we show here that the division protein DivIC stabilizes FtsL against RasP cleavage. Degradation seems to be initiated upon accessibility of a cytosolic substrate recognition motif.Cell division in bacteria is a highly regulated process (1). The division site selection as well as assembly and disassembly of the divisome have to be strictly controlled (1, 4). Although the spatial control of the divisome is relatively well understood (2, 4, 14, 17), mechanisms governing the temporal control of division are still mainly elusive. Regulatory proteolysis was thought to be a potential modulatory mechanism (8, 9). The highly unstable division protein FtsL was shown to be rate limiting for division and would make an ideal candidate for a regulatory factor in the timing of bacterial cell division (7, 9). In Bacillus subtilis, FtsL is an essential protein of the membrane part of the divisome (5, 7, 8). It is necessary for the assembly of the membrane-spanning division proteins, and a knockout is lethal (8, 9, 12). We have previously reported that FtsL is a substrate of the intramembrane protease RasP (5).These findings raised the question of whether RasP can regulate cell division by cleaving FtsL from the division complex. In order to mimic the situation in which FtsL is bound to at least one of its interaction partners, we used a heterologous coexpression system in which we synthesized FtsL and DivIC. It has been reported before that DivIC and FtsL are intimate binding partners in various organisms (6, 9, 15, 21, 22, 26) and that FtsL and DivIC (together with DivIB) can form complexes even in the absence of the other divisome components (6, 21). We therefore asked whether RasP is able to cleave FtsL in the presence of its major interaction partner DivIC, which would argue for the possibility that RasP could cleave FtsL within a mature divisome. In contrast, if interaction with DivIC could stabilize FtsL against RasP cleavage, this result would bring such a model into question. An alternative option for the role of RasP might be the removal of FtsL from the membrane. It has been shown that divisome disassembly and prevention of reassembly are crucial to prevent minicell formation close to the new cell poles (3, 16).     

A Bacillus anthracis S-Layer Homology Protein That Binds Heme and Mediates Heme Delivery to IsdC

The sequestration of iron by mammalian hosts represents a significant obstacle to the establishment of a bacterial infection. In response, pathogenic bacteria have evolved mechanisms to acquire iron from host heme. Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax, utilizes secreted hemophores to scavenge heme from host hemoglobin, thereby facilitating iron acquisition from extracellular heme pools and delivery to iron-regulated surface determinant (Isd) proteins covalently attached to the cell wall. However, several Gram-positive pathogens, including B. anthracis, contain genes that encode near iron transporter (NEAT) proteins that are genomically distant from the genetically linked Isd locus. NEAT domains are protein modules that partake in several functions related to heme transport, including binding heme and hemoglobin. This finding raises interesting questions concerning the relative role of these NEAT proteins, relative to hemophores and the Isd system, in iron uptake. Here, we present evidence that a B. anthracis S-layer homology (SLH) protein harboring a NEAT domain binds and directionally transfers heme to the Isd system via the cell wall protein IsdC. This finding suggests that the Isd system can receive heme from multiple inputs and may reflect an adaptation of B. anthracis to changing iron reservoirs during an infection. Understanding the mechanism of heme uptake in pathogenic bacteria is important for the development of novel therapeutics to prevent and treat bacterial infections.Pathogenic bacteria need to acquire iron to survive in mammalian hosts (12). However, the host sequesters most iron in the porphyrin heme, and heme itself is often bound to proteins such as hemoglobin (14, 28, 85). Circulating hemoglobin can serve as a source of heme-iron for replicating bacteria in infected hosts, but the precise mechanisms of heme extraction, transport, and assimilation remain unclear (25, 46, 79, 86). An understanding of how bacterial pathogens import heme will lead to the development of new anti-infectives that inhibit heme uptake, thereby preventing or treating infections caused by these bacteria (47, 68).The mechanisms of transport of biological molecules into a bacterial cell are influenced by the compositional, structural, and topological makeup of the cell envelope. Gram-negative bacteria utilize specific proteins to transport heme through the outer membrane, periplasm, and inner membrane (83, 84). Instead of an outer membrane and periplasm, Gram-positive bacteria contain a thick cell wall (59, 60). Proteins covalently anchored to the cell wall provide a functional link between extracellular heme reservoirs and intracellular iron utilization pathways (46). In addition, several Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial genera also contain an outermost structure termed the S (surface)-layer (75). The S-layer is a crystalline array of protein that surrounds the bacterial cell and may serve a multitude of functions, including maintenance of cell architecture and protection from host immune components (6, 7, 18, 19, 56). In bacterial pathogens that manifest an S-layer, the “force field” function of this structure raises questions concerning how small molecules such as heme can be successfully passed from the extracellular milieu to cell wall proteins for delivery into the cell cytoplasm.Bacillus anthracis is a Gram-positive, spore-forming bacterium that is the etiological agent of anthrax disease (30, 33). The life cycle of B. anthracis begins after a phagocytosed spore germinates into a vegetative cell inside a mammalian host (2, 40, 69, 78). Virulence determinants produced by the vegetative cells facilitate bacterial growth, dissemination to major organ systems, and eventually host death (76-78). The release of aerosolized spores into areas with large concentrations of people is a serious public health concern (30).Heme acquisition in B. anthracis is mediated by the action of IsdX1 and IsdX2, two extracellular hemophores that extract heme from host hemoglobin and deliver the iron-porphyrin to cell wall-localized IsdC (21, 45). Both IsdX1 and IsdX2 harbor near iron transporter domains (NEATs), a conserved protein module found in Gram-positive bacteria that mediates heme uptake from hemoglobin and contributes to bacterial pathogenesis upon infection (3, 8, 21, 31, 44, 46, 49, 50, 67, 81, 86). Hypothesizing that B. anthracis may contain additional mechanisms for heme transport, we provide evidence that B. anthracis S-layer protein K (BslK), an S-layer homology (SLH) and NEAT protein (32, 43), is surface localized and binds and transfers heme to IsdC in a rapid, contact-dependent manner. These results suggest that the Isd system is not a self-contained conduit for heme trafficking and imply that there is functional cross talk between differentially localized NEAT proteins to promote heme uptake during infection.     

Flagellated but Not Hyperfimbriated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Attaches to and Forms Biofilms on Cholesterol-Coated Surfaces

The asymptomatic, chronic carrier state of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi occurs in the bile-rich gallbladder and is frequently associated with the presence of cholesterol gallstones. We have previously demonstrated that salmonellae form biofilms on human gallstones and cholesterol-coated surfaces in vitro and that bile-induced biofilm formation on cholesterol gallstones promotes gallbladder colonization and maintenance of the carrier state. Random transposon mutants of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium were screened for impaired adherence to and biofilm formation on cholesterol-coated Eppendorf tubes but not on glass and plastic surfaces. We identified 49 mutants with this phenotype. The results indicate that genes involved in flagellum biosynthesis and structure primarily mediated attachment to cholesterol. Subsequent analysis suggested that the presence of the flagellar filament enhanced binding and biofilm formation in the presence of bile, while flagellar motility and expression of type 1 fimbriae were unimportant. Purified Salmonella flagellar proteins used in a modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) showed that FliC was the critical subunit mediating binding to cholesterol. These studies provide a better understanding of early events during biofilm development, specifically how salmonellae bind to cholesterol, and suggest a target for therapies that may alleviate biofilm formation on cholesterol gallstones and the chronic carrier state.The serovars of Salmonella enterica are diverse, infect a broad array of hosts, and cause significant morbidity and mortality in impoverished and industrialized nations worldwide. S. enterica serovar Typhi is the etiologic agent of typhoid fever, a severe illness characterized by sustained bacteremia and a delayed onset of symptoms that afflicts approximately 20 million people each year (14, 19). Serovar Typhi can establish a chronic infection of the human gallbladder, suggesting that this bacterium utilizes novel mechanisms to mediate enhanced colonization and persistence in a bile-rich environment.There is a strong correlation between gallbladder abnormalities, particularly gallstones, and development of the asymptomatic Salmonella carrier state (47). Antibiotic regimens are typically ineffective in carriers with gallstones (47), and these patients have an 8.47-fold-higher risk of developing hepatobiliary carcinomas (28, 46, 91). Elimination of chronic infections usually requires gallbladder removal (47), but surgical intervention is cost-prohibitive in developing countries where serovar Typhi is prevalent. Thus, understanding the progression of infection to the carrier state and developing alternative treatment options are of critical importance to human health.The formation of biofilms on gallstones has been hypothesized to facilitate enhanced colonization of and persistence in the gallbladder. Over the past 2 decades, bacterial biofilms have been increasingly implicated as burdens for food and public safety worldwide, and they are broadly defined as heterogeneous communities of microorganisms that adhere to each other and to inert or live surfaces (17, 22, 67, 89, 102). A sessile environment provides selective advantages in natural, medical, and industrial ecosystems for diverse species of commensal and pathogenic bacteria, including Streptococcus mutans (40, 92, 104), Staphylococcus aureus (15, 35, 100), Escherichia coli (21, 74), Vibrio cholerae (39, 52, 107), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23, 58, 73, 105). Bacterial biofilms are increasingly associated with many chronic infections in humans and exhibit heightened resistance to commonly administered antibiotics and to engulfment by professional phagocytes (54, 55, 59). The bacterial gene expression profiles for planktonic and biofilm phenotypes differ (42, 90), and the changes are likely regulated by external stimuli, including nutrient availability, the presence of antimicrobials, and the composition of the binding substrate.Biofilm formation occurs in sequential, highly ordered stages and begins with attachment of free-swimming, planktonic bacteria to a surface. Subsequent biofilm maturation is characterized by the production of a self-initiated extracellular matrix (ECM) composed of nucleic acid, proteins, or exopolysaccharides (EPS) that encase the community of microorganisms. Planktonic cells are continuously shed from the sessile, matrix-bound population, which can result in reattachment and fortification of the biofilm or systemic infection and release of the organism into the environment. Shedding of serovar Typhi by asymptomatic carriers can contaminate food and water and account for much of the person-to-person transmission in underdeveloped countries.Our laboratory has previously reported that bile is required for formation of mature biofilms with characteristic EPS production by S. enterica serovars Typhimurium, Enteritidis, and Typhi on human gallstones and cholesterol-coated Eppendorf tubes (18, 78). Cholesterol is the primary constituent of human cholesterol gallstones, and use of cholesterol-coated tubes creates an in vitro uniform surface that mimics human gallstones (18). It was also demonstrated that Salmonella biofilms that formed on different surfaces had unique phenotypes and required expression of specific EPS (18, 77), yet the factors mediating Salmonella binding to gallstones and cholesterol-coated surfaces during the initiation of biofilm formation remain unknown. Here, we show that the presence of serovar Typhimurium flagella promotes binding specifically to cholesterol in the early stages of biofilm development and that the FliC subunit is a critical component. Bound salmonellae expressing intact flagella provided a scaffold for other cells to bind to during later stages of biofilm growth. Elucidation of key mechanisms that mediate adherence to cholesterol during Salmonella bile-induced biofilm formation on gallstone surfaces promises to reveal novel drug targets for alleviating biofilm formation in chronic cases.     

Mutations in the Stalk Region of the Measles Virus Hemagglutinin Inhibit Syncytium Formation but Not Virus Entry

Measles virus (MV) entry requires at least 2 viral proteins, the hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins. We describe the rescue and characterization of a measles virus with a specific mutation in the stalk region of H (I98A) that is able to bind normally to cells but infects at a lower rate than the wild type due to a reduction in fusion triggering. The mutant H protein binds to F more avidly than the parent H protein does, and the corresponding virus is more sensitive to inhibition by fusion-inhibitory peptide. We show that after binding of MV to its receptor, H-F dissociation is required for productive infection.Measles virus (MV) infection requires binding of the hemagglutinin (H) protein to its cognate receptors (9, 20, 21, 29, 41) while the fusion (F) protein triggers membrane lipid mixing and fusion. The H protein is a type II transmembrane homodimeric, disulfide-linked glycoprotein (33). The F protein is a type I membrane glycoprotein that exists as a homotrimeric complex. The protein is cleaved by furin in the trans-Golgi network into a metastable heterodimer with a membrane-spanning F₁ domain and a membrane-distal F₂ domain (16). Expressed alone, neither H nor F leads to membrane fusion, and therefore, both proteins are required and have to interact for productive infection of a target cell (46). There is evidence that these interactions start within the endoplasmic reticulum (34).The H proteins of Paramyxoviridae family members have a globular head with a six-blade β-propellor structure that is responsible for receptor binding (4, 7, 13), a stalk region composed of alpha-helical coiled coils (18, 48) that anchors the complex to the plasma membrane, and a short cytoplasmic domain that can interact with the matrix (M) protein and modulate fusion (2). Given that the F protein does not interact with a receptor on the target cell but undergoes conformational changes to enable membrane fusion, it seems likely that the F protein must interact with the H protein that enables fusion (14, 19, 23, 24, 35, 47). The molecular interactions between the F and H proteins are being increasingly understood (6, 8, 24, 25, 30, 35, 42). Hummel and Bellini have described a mutation in the H glycoprotein where threonine replaced isoleucine 98, which led to loss of fusion in chronically infected cells, but the virus was not rescued (15). Corey and Iorio performed alanine-scanning mutagenesis to determine the role of specific, membrane-proximal residues in the stalk region of the H protein responsible for H-F interactions (6). Substitution of alanine for specific residues in this region altered cell-to-cell fusion and the strength of the H-F interaction in transient-transfection experiments (6). Replacement of isoleucine with alanine at position 98 reduced fusion but did not significantly alter hemadsorption, implying that binding of the mutant H protein to CD46 was not affected (6). More recently, Paal et al. showed that the H protein can tolerate significant additions to its alpha-helical coiled coils without loss of binding or fusion in transient-transfection assays (30). Although these studies confirm the importance of the interactions between the H protein stalk and the metastable F protein for enabling fusion after receptor binding, the exact steps leading to fusion are still unclear. Moreover, studies evaluating H-F interactions were performed with transient protein expression and not in the presence of the actual virus. This is potentially an important shortcoming since the M protein can modulate infection and fusion (1).