Prior exposure of maiden ewes to rams enhances their behavioural interactions with rams but is not a pre-requisite to their endocrine response to the ram effect

In this study, we tested whether prior experience with rams would modify the behavioural and endocrine responses of maiden ewes to rams. During mid-anoestrus, sexually na?ve, maiden ewes were exposed to rams for 7 days (ram experienced, RE; n=61) or isolated from rams (ram na?ve, RN; n=63). All ewes were subsequently isolated from rams. In Experiment 1, RE (n=55) and RN (n=57) ewes were introduced to rams during late anoestrus. RE ewes had more total and positive interactions with rams than RN ewes (P<0.001). RE ewes showed more ram seeking behaviour and spent more time in proximity of rams than RN ewes (at least; P<0.05). In Experiment 2, RE (n=6) and RN (n=6) ewes were introduced to rams midway through a frequent blood sampling regime in late anoestrus. Ram introduction stimulated an increase in LH pulse frequency and basal LH in both RE and RN ewes (at least P<0.05). RE ewes had an increase in mean LH concentrations (P<0.01) that failed to reach significance in RN ewes (P<0.1). There was no significant effect of prior experience with rams on LH pulse frequency, amplitude or whether ewes had an LH surge. In conclusion, prior experience with rams is important in developing appropriate ewe-ram interactions but is not a pre-requisite to the endocrine response to the ram effect.     

Effects of the presence of rams during pregnancy on lambing performance in ewes

Ewes of the Préalpes-du-Sud breed (n=112) were mated with fertile rams and were used to investigate the effect of the presence of vasectomized rams during pregnancy on reproductive outcomes. Ewes in the control group (n=56) were isolated from rams during the whole period of pregnancy, whereas those in the experimental group (n=56) were kept with vasectomized rams from day 10 post-mating until lambing. At day 10 post-mating, a series of blood samples was collected every 15 min for 8 h from five control ewes and five experimental ewes to determine their patterns of LH secretion. The introduction of the ram was associated with a rapid increase of pulsatile LH release. The lag between the introduction of the ram and the onset of the first episodic LH release was less than 15 min. The mean(±sem) number of LH pulses/4 h after the introduction of the ram (2.8±0.4) was significantly higher (P<0.01) than that observed/4 h before the introduction of the ram (1.4±0.2). Although more ewes were pregnant in the control group (87.5%) than in the ram-exposed group (82.1%), the difference was not significant. The presence of rams did not affect gestation length (145.8 days), overall lamb mortality (3.5%) or birth weights of single (3.96 kg), twin (3.24 kg) or triplet (2.59 kg) lambs. The proportion of ewes with multiple births in the control group (69.4%) was significantly greater (P<0.05) than that in the ram-exposed ewes (47.8%). The ewes in the control group had significantly more (P<0.01) twin lambs born alive (72.3%) than the ewes in the ram-exposed group (50.0%). In conclusion, the presence of vasectomized rams during early pregnancy affected the incidence of multiple births but did not affect pregnancy rate or gestation length. The altered fertility of ewes exposed to vasectomized rams may reflect changes in embryonic loss during early pregnancy.     

Effect of ram exposure at the end of progestagen treatment on estrus synchronisation and fertility during the breeding season in ewes

Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of ram exposure during the breeding season, in combination with progestagen treatment on estrus synchronization, fertility the LH surge and ovulation in ewes. Experiment 1 was subdivided into experiments 1a and 1b. In all experiments cross-bred ewes were treated with an intravaginal sponge for 12-14 days and three days before sponge withdrawal ewes were divided into control (no further treatment; n=191, 103 and 50 for experiments 1a, 1b and 2, respectively) or ram exposed (three mature rams per 50 ewes were introduced; +Ram; n=187, 99 and 49 for experiments 1a, 1b and 2, respectively). At sponge withdrawal ewes in Experiments 1a and 2 received 500 IU eCG and rams were removed from all the +Ram groups. In Experiments 1a and 1b, raddled, entire rams were introduced to ewes 48 h after sponge withdrawal. The timing of mating was recorded and ewes were maintained until lambing. In Experiment 2, estrus behavior was determined every 4 h and the time of the LH surge and ovulation were determined from a subset of 10 ewes per group. In Experiment 1a, less +Ram ewes were bred by 48 h after ram introduction (control 98% versus +Ram 89%, P<0.001) and in Experiments 1a and 1b 14% fewer (P<0.05) of the ewes bred in the first 3 h after ram introduction lambed to that service. In Experiment 1a, ram exposed ewes had a lower litter size than control ewes (1.93+/-0.06 versus 1.70+/-0.06 lambs per ewe; P<0.05). In Experiment 2, rams advanced (P<0.05) estrus, the LH surge and ovulation by 2-6 h compared with control ewes. We speculate that exposure of ewes to rams increased LH secretion and that this in turn increased follicle development and the production of oestradiol that led to a more rapid onset of estrus, the LH surge and ovulation compared to control ewes. Unexpectedly, ewes that were bred had lower fertility in the +Ram groups than control groups.     

Effects of progesterone on the responses of Merino ewes to the introduction of rams during anoestrus

The effects of progesterone on the responses of Merino ewes to the introduction of rams during anoestrus were investigated in two experiments. In the first experiment, the introduction of rams induced an increase in the levels of LH in entire ewes. The mean levels increased from 0.68 +/- 0.04 ng/ml (mean +/- s.e.m.) to 4.49 +/- 1.32 ng/ml within 20 min in ewes not treated with progesterone (n = 10). In ewes bearing progesterone implants that provided a peripheral concentration of about 1.5 ng progesterone per millilitre plasma, the LH response to the introduction of rams was not prevented, but was reduced in size so that the concentration was 1.38 +/- 0.15 ng/ml after 20 min (n = 5). Progesterone treatment begun either 2 days before or 6 h after the introduction of rams and maintained for 4 days prevented ovulation. In the second experiment ovariectomized ewes were used to investigate further the mechanism by which the ram evoked increases in tonic LH secretion. In ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol implants, the introduction of rams increased the frequency of the LH pulses and the basal level of LH. In the absence of oestradiol there was no significant change in pulse frequency but a small increase in basal levels. Progesterone again did not prevent but reduced the responses in ewes treated with oestradiol. It is suggested that following the withdrawal of progesterone treatment, the secretion of LH pulses in response to the ram effect would be dampened. This effect could be a component of the reported long delay between the introduction of rams and the preovulatory surge of LH in ewes treated with progesterone. Continued progesterone treatment prevented ovulation, probably by blocking positive feedback by oestradiol.     

Effects of duration and timing of progesterone priming on the incidence of corpora lutea with a normal life-span in Merino ewes induced to ovulate by the introduction of rams

Three experiments investigated the effects of progesterone on the incidence of corpora lutea with normal life-span in seasonally anovulatory Merino ewes induced to ovulate by the introduction of rams.Ewes in Experiments 1 and 2 received a single i.m. injection of 20 mg progesterone in oil at the time of, or up to 5 days before introduction of rams. Control ewes received oil alone. Progesterone priming had no effect on the proportion of ewes induced to ovulate, and the beneficial effect of progesterone on the proportion of corpora lutea with a normal life-span (P < 0.001, Experiment 1; P < 0.01, Experiment 2) was independent of its time of administration. Injection of progesterone delayed the time of the surge of LH compared to control ewes (P < 0.001), but only when given at the time of introduction of rams.Administration of progesterone by intravaginal devices for 6 h, 12 h or 24 h before introduction of rams (Experiment 3) increased the incidence of corpora lutea with normal luteal life-span compared to control ewes, but had no effect on the proportion of ewes ovulating. The incidence of corpora lutea with a normal life-span was significantly and positively correlated (R=0.977; P < 0.05) with duration of progesterone priming before introduction of rams.These results indicate that duration but not timing of progesterone priming is critical to its ability to eliminate short life-span corpora lutea. Such findings support the concept of a mode of action of progesterone at the ovarian level.     

Effect of the introduction of rams during the anoestrous season on the pulsatile secretion of LH in ovariectomized ewes

Introduction of rams to ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol implants (N = 10) increased the frequency of LH pulses from 4 X 8 to 10 X 6 pulses per 12 h. This effect was reflected by increases in mean levels of LH and the basal levels upon which the pulses were superimposed. In ewes that had not been treated with oestradiol (N = 5), there was no significant increase in pulse frequency but mean and basal levels of LH increased slightly after the introduction of rams. In a second experiment, similar effects of the introduction of rams were seen in ovariectomized ewes treated with oestradiol or oestradiol + androstenedione (N = 16), but no significant effects of the rams were observed in untreated ewes (N = 8) or ewes treated only with androstenedione (N = 7). No preovulatory surges of LH were observed in the 30-h period after the introduction of rams. It was concluded that the ram stimulus probably evokes the increase in pulse frequency by inhibiting the negative feedback action of oestradiol, and that the surge normally observed in entire ewes is dependent on the ovarian response to these pulses. However, the observation of responses in some ewes not treated with oestradiol also raises the possibility that the ram stimulus can act directly on the hypothalamic neurones that control the secretion of LH, and that this effect is enhanced in the presence of oestrogen.     

Increased plasma LH levels in seasonally anovular merino ewes following the introduction of rams

Seven seasonally anovular Merino ewes, isolated from rams, were bled every 10 min for 12 h. Rams were introduced the following day, after a further 2 h of sampling every 10 min, and samples were taken for the following 10 h. Three days after the introduction of rams, the ewes underwent laparoscopy, and four had ovulated.Radioimmunoassay of plasma samples revealed pulsatile rhythms in the concentration of LH, with the frequency of pulses varying between ewes, from about once hourly to once every 10 h. Upon the introduction of rams, LH secretion increased within 10 min in six ewes, of which four ovulated within 3 days. There is apparently a relationship between the pattern of LH secretion after introducing the rams, and the ovulatory response that can be expected.     

Reproductive response and LH secretion in ewes treated with melatonin implants and induced to ovulate with the ram effect

Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of treating seasonally anoestrous ewes with melatonin before ram introduction on reproductive response, and on LH secretion in anoestrous ewes induced to ovulate by rams.In Experiment 1, a total of 667 ewes from three flocks involving Merino (Flock 1, N = 149), Merino entrefino (Flock 2, N = 325) and Rasa Aragonesa (Flock 3, N = 203) breeds were used. Within each flock, ewes isolated from rams since the previous lambing were assigned at random to receive melatonin implants of Regulin (75, 175 and 105 in Merino, Merino entrefino and Rasa Aragonesa flocks, respectively) or to serve as untreated controls (74 in Merino, 150 in Merino entrefino and 98 in Rasa Aragonesa flocks). Fertile rams were introduced into all flocks 5 weeks after implantation in March (Flocks 1 and 2) or April (Flock 3), and remained with the ewes for a 50 day mating period. Percentage of ewes with luteal activity at ram introduction did not differ between melatonin treated and control ewes in any flock. There were no significant differences in either the mean interval from ram introduction to lambing or the distribution of lambing. Implantation with melatonin resulted in an improvement of prolificacy in all three flocks, although this only reached statistical significance in the Merino flock (1.15 vs. 1.03 in treated and control ewes, respectively, P < 0.05). Fertility was increased significantly (P < 0.05) in the Merino entrefino flock (64.5% in treated vs. 51.3% in control ewes).In Experiment 2, two trials were undertaken utilizing a total of 63 ewes. Trial 1 involved 24 mature Manchega ewes and Trial 2 involved 39 Merino ewe lambs. Half of the animals in each trial received a Regulin implant on 28 February (Trial 1) or 12 March (Trial 2) and the remaining half acted as controls. Rams were introduced 5 weeks after implantation and remained with the ewes for a 25 day period. In both trials, anoestrous ewes at ram introduction were bled at 20 min intervals for 3 h before and 5 h after ram introduction and then at 3 h intervals over the next 24 h for assessment of plasma concentrations of LH. Secretion of LH before or following introduction of rams was not affected by melatonin. Both treated and control anoestrous ewes in each trial responded to introduction of rams with an increase in the frequency of the LH pulses (P < 0.05), but no significant changes were detected in pulse amplitude or mean levels of LH. A preovulatory surge of LH was detected between 8 and 26 h after ram introduction, but neither mean interval from ram introduction to the peak of LH surge, nor the magnitude of the LH peak, was influenced by melatonin treatment.Results from this study show that: (1) melatonin implants administered during early seasonal anoestrus have the potential to improve reproductive performance in Spanish breeds of sheep, but the response is conditioned by breed, management system and environmental factors; (2) melatonin did not modify the secretion of LH in anoestrous ewes induced to ovulate by the ram effect under our experimental conditions.     

The continuous presence of ewes in estrus in spring influences testicular volume,testicular echogenicity and testosterone concentration,but not LH pulsatility in rams

The continuous presence of active male small ruminants prevents seasonal anestrus in females, but evidence of the same mechanism operating from the females to the males is scarce. This study assessed the effects of the continuous presence of ewes in estrus in spring on ram sexual activity, testicular size and echogenicity, and LH and testosterone concentrations. On 1 March, 20 rams were assigned to two groups (n = 10 each): isolated (ISO) from other sheep, or stimulated (STI) by 12 ewes, which were separated from the rams by an openwork metal barrier, allowing contact between sexes. Each week, four ewes were induced into estrus by intravaginal sponges. Live weight, scrotal circumference, testicular width (TW) and length (TL) were recorded at the beginning and at the end of the experiment, and testicular volume (TV) was calculated; at the same time, testicular ultrasonography and color Doppler scanning were performed. Blood samples (March to May) were collected once per week for testosterone determinations, and at the end of the experiment, blood samples were collected for 6 h at 20-min intervals for LH analysis. Rams were exposed to four estrous ewes in a serving-capacity test. Scrotal circumference, TW and TL were higher in the STI than in the ISO rams (P < 0.05) in May, and TV was higher (P < 0.05) in the STI (391 ± 17 cm³) than in the ISO rams (354 ± 24 cm³). In ISO rams, the number of white pixels was higher (P < 0.01) in May (348 ± 74) than in March (94 ± 21) and differed significantly (P < 0.01) from that of the STI rams in May (160 ± 33). In ISO rams, the number of grey pixels was higher (P < 0.05) in May (107 ± 3) than it was in March (99 ± 1). Stimulated and ISO rams did not differ significantly in mean LH plasma concentrations (0.8 ± 0.5 v. 0.9 ± 0.4 ng/ml), LH pulses (2.1 ± 0.5 v. 2.2 ± 0.2) and amplitude (2.0 ± 0.4 v. 3.2 ± 0.7 ng/ml, respectively). Stimulated rams had significantly higher testosterone concentrations than ISO rams from April to the end of the experiment. Stimulated rams performed more (P < 0.05) mountings with intromission (3.0 ± 0.4) than did ISO rams (1.5 ± 0.5). In conclusion, after 3 months in the continuous presence of ewes in estrus in spring, rams had higher TV and some testicular echogenic parameters were modified than isolated rams. Although exposed rams also had higher levels of testosterone after 2 months in the presence of estrous ewes, their LH pulsatility at the end of the study was not modified.     

Diurnal variation in the response of anoestrous ewes to the ram effect

The re-introduction of rams after a period of separation was used to stimulate LH secretion and induce ovulation in seasonally anovulatory ewes maintained under natural photoperiod. In 2 experiments, the rams were introduced in the morning or the evening to test for diurnal variations in responsiveness to the treatment. In the first experiment, with Romanov ewes, the ram-induced increase in tonic LH secretion was significantly earlier in the ewes treated (N = 6) at 07:30 h (mean +/- s.e.m. delay to first pulse: 20 +/- 6 min) than in those (N = 5) treated at 19:30 h (66 +/- 15 min; P = 0.006). The pulse interval after the ram effect was significantly shorter in ewes that subsequently ovulated (120 +/- 10 min) than in ewes that did not ovulate (288 +/- 108 min; P = 0.043). There was a significant decline in pulse amplitude from 6.7 +/- 1.2 to 3.4 +/- 0.6 ng/ml (both groups combined) after the introduction of rams (P = 0.040). Of the 11 ewes, 7 subsequently ovulated and a preovulatory LH surge was observed in 6 of these 30-36 h after ram introduction. In the second experiment, with seasonally anoestrous Préalpes-du-Sud ewes, the effect of the timing of the introduction of rams on the periovulatory events was tested. The delay to the onsets of oestrus and the LH surge was not affected, but the ovulation rate was higher after ram introduction in the morning (1.42) than in the evening (1.14). In the 12-h period before the introduction of the rams in the first experiment, there was a difference between the groups in the secretion of LH, but the existence of diurnal rhythms in the concentrations of LH or FSH were not confirmed in a later study in which 7 ewes were sampled every 20 min for 36 h. In contrast, there was a distinct diurnal variation in the secretion of prolactin, with the highest values being recorded at night and the lowest around midday (P = 0.025). The rise and fall in prolactin values did not appear to coincide with dawn or dusk.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

The introduction of rams induces an increase in pulsatile LH secretion in cyclic ewes during the breeding season

Application of the ram effect during the breeding season has been previously disregarded because the ewe reproductive axis is powerfully inhibited by luteal phase progesterone concentrations. However, anovulatory ewes treated with exogenous progestagens respond to ram introduction with an increase in LH concentrations. We therefore tested whether cyclic ewes would respond to ram introduction with an increase in pulsatile LH secretion at all stages of the estrous cycle. We did two experiments using genotypes native to temperate or Mediterranean regions. In Experiment 1 (UK), 12 randomly cycling, North of England Mule ewes were introduced to rams midway through a frequent blood-sampling regime. Ewes in the early (EL; n=3) [corrected] and late luteal (LL; n=6) phase responded to ram introduction with an increase in LH pulse frequency and mean and basal concentration [corrected] of LH (at least P<0.05). In Experiment 2 (Australia), the cycles of 32 Merino ewes were synchronised using intravaginal progestagen pessaries. Pessary insertion was staggered to produce eight ewes at each stage of the estrous cycle: follicular (F), early luteal (EL), mid-luteal (ML) and late luteal (LL). In all stages of the cycle, ewes responded to ram introduction with an increase in LH pulse frequency (P<0.01); EL, ML and LL ewes also had an increase in mean LH concentration (P<0.05). In conclusion, ram introduction to cyclic ewes stimulated an increase in pulsatile LH secretion, independent of ewe genotype or stage of the estrous cycle.     

Endocrine and Ovarian Changes in Response to the Ram Effect in Medroxyprogesterone Acetate-primed Corriedale Ewes During the Breeding and Nonbreeding Season

Two experiments were performed to determine the endocrine and ovarian changes in medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP)-primed ewes after ram introduction. Experiment 1 was performed during the mid-breeding season with 71 ewes primed with an intravaginal MAP sponge for 12 days. While the control (C) ewes (n = 35) were in permanent contact with rams, the ram effect (RE) ewes (n = 36) were isolated for 34 days prior to contact with rams. At sponge withdrawal, all ewes were joined with eight sexually experienced marking Corriedale rams and estrus was recorded over the next 4 days. The ovaries were observed by laparoscopy 4–6 days after estrus. Four weeks later, pregnancy was determined by transrectal ultrasonography. In eight ewes from each group, ovaries were ultrasonographically scanned; FSH, LH, and estradiol-17β were measured every 12 hours until ovulation or 96 hours after estrus. The response to the rams was not affected by the fact that ewes had been kept or not in close contact with males before teasing. No differences were found in FSH, LH, estradiol-17β concentrations, growth of the ovulatory follicle, onset of estrus, ovulation rate, or pregnancy rate. Experiment 2 was performed with 14 ewes during the nonbreeding season. Ewes were isolated from rams for 1 month, and received a 6-day MAP priming. Ovaries were ultrasonographically scanned every 12 hours, and FSH, LH, estradiol-17β, and progesterone were measured. Ewes that ovulated and came into estrus had higher FSH and estradiol-17β levels before introduction of the rams than did ewes that had a silent ovulation. The endocrine pattern of the induced follicular phase of ewes that came into estrus was more similar to a normal follicular phase, than in ewes that had a silent ovulation. The follicle that finally ovulated tended to emerge earlier and in a more synchronized fashion in those ewes that did come into estrus. All ewes that ovulated had an LH surge and reached higher maximum FSH levels than ewes that did not ovulate, none of which had an LH surge. We conclude that (a) the effect of ram introduction in cyclic ewes treated with MAP may vary depending on the time of the breeding season at which teasing is performed; (b) patterns of FSH, and estradiol-17β concentrations, as indicators of activity of the reproductive axis, may be used to classify depth of anestrus; and (c) the endocrine pattern of the induced follicular phase, which is related to the depth of anestrus, may be reflected in the behavioral responses to MAP priming and the ram effect.     

Use of gonadotropin releasing hormone to improve reproductive responses of ewes introduced to rams during seasonal anestrus

Three experiments were conducted on anestrous ewes of Suffolk, Dorset, and Katahdin breeding to examine the potential value of GnRH to improve ovulation and pregnancy in response to introduction of rams. In Experiment 1, treatment with GnRH 2 d after treatment with progesterone (P₄; 25 mg i.m.) at introduction of rams was compared to treatment with P₄ alone at the time of introduction of rams. Treatment with GnRH did not increase percentages of ewes with a corpus luteum (CL) 14 d after introduction of rams, pregnant 32 d after treatment with PGF₂α 14 d after introduction of rams, or percent of treated ewes lambing to all services. In Experiment 2, treatments with GnRH on day 2, 7, or both after introduction of rams were compared. Treatments did not differ in mean estrous response, percentages of ewes with a detectable CL or number of CL present on day 11, or mean pregnancy and lambing rates. Therefore, neither one nor two injections of GnRH at these times appeared to be effective to induce anestrous ewes to breed. In Experiment 3, treatments compared included GnRH 4 d before introduction of rams, GnRH 4 d before and 1 d after introduction of rams, ram introduction alone, and treatment with P₄ (25 mg i.m.) at the time of introduction of rams. Percentages of ewes with concentrations of P₄ greater than 1 ng/mL (indicating formation of CL had occurred) 7 d after ram introduction tended to be greater (P < 0.07) in ewes treated with GnRH or P₄ than in control ewes treated with ram introduction alone. However, there was no difference in P₄ concentrations between groups by day 11 or 12 after introduction of rams. Estrous response rates and percentages of ewes pregnant 95 d after PGF₂α was administered (on day 12 after introduction of rams) tended to be greater (P = 0.08 and 0.06, respectively) in ewes treated with GnRH or P₄ than in ewes exposed to rams only. There was no difference in response variables between ewes treated with GnRH 4 d before introduction of rams and ewes treated with GnRH 4 d before and 1 d after introduction of rams. In conclusion, treatment with GnRH 4 d before ram introduction showed promise as an alternative to treatment with P₄ to improve the ovulatory response and reproductive performance of ewes introduced to rams during seasonal anestrus.     

Short term, repeated exposure to rams during the transition into the breeding season improves the synchrony of mating in the breeding season

The ram effect is widely used in Mediterranean breeds of sheep but its use in temperate genotypes is restricted by breed seasonality. However, ewes from these highly seasonal genotypes are sensitive to stimulation by rams close to the onset of the natural breeding season. In this study we developed a pre-mating protocol of repeated, short-term exposure to rams (fence-line contact or vasectomised rams) beginning during late anoestrus and continuing into the breeding season. We hypothesised that this pre-mating protocol would synchronise the distribution of mating of North of England Mule ewes during the breeding season above that observed in ewes isolated from rams prior to mating. Ram-exposed ewes were given contact with rams (Experiment 1: fence-line; FR, n = 94 and Experiment 2: vasectomised rams; VR; n = 103) for 24 h on Days 0 (10 September), 17 and 34 of the experiment. Control ewes (Experiment 1; FC, n = 98 and Experiment 2; VC; n = 106) remained isolated from rams prior to mating. In Experiment 2, a subset of VR (n = 35) and VC ewes (n = 35) were blood sampled twice weekly to monitor their pre-mating progesterone profiles. At mating, harnessed entire rams were introduced, 17 or 16 days after the last ram exposure (Experiments 1 and 2) and raddle marks were recorded daily. The median time from ram introduction to mating was reduced in ewes given both fence-line and vasectomised ram contact (P < 0.001), leading to a more compact distribution of mating and lambing (At least P < 0.01). In the blood sampled VR ewes, there was a progressive decline in the number of days from ram exposure to the onset of dioestrus (at least P < 0.05). This observation indicates that the cycles in VR ewes became increasingly synchronised over the pre-mating period, a pattern not evident in VC ewes. In conclusion, repeated, short-term exposure of ewes to rams during the transition into the breeding season is an effective method of synchronising the distribution of mating during the breeding season.     

Female effect in sheep. I. The effects of sexual receptivity of females and the sexual experience of rams

When in contact with receptive or non-receptive ewes, the presence of females increased LH peak frequency both in experienced and inexperienced rams (P less than 0.05). The highest response was found in experienced rams stimulated by sexually receptive ewes. In this group only, the mean testosterone levels increased during stimulation (P less than 0.05). Sexual behavior did not differ between experienced and inexperienced males. The sexual receptivity of the females and the sexual experience of rams appear to interact and thus facilitate the rams' LH and testosterone responses to the presence of ewes.     

Response of pre-pubertally castrated rams and ewes to artificial photoperiod--changes in plasma LH and prolactin

Castrate rams and ovariectomized ewes were maintained in the presence of entire rams and ewes and subjected to successive periods of alternating 6 h light:18 h darkness ('short' days) and 18 h light:6 h darkness ('long' days) preceded by a period of 12 h light:12 h darkness ('constant' light days). Plasma concentrations of LH and prolactin were measured in the castrate animals in order to determine how LH and prolactin secretion responded to the artificial light regime and corresponding periods of elevated or depressed testicular and ovarian activity in the entire rams and ewes. There was no variation in mean plasma LH concentrations or LH pulse frequency with either the changes in photoperiod or the phases of gonadal activity in the entire animals. However, there was a highly significant (P less than 0.001) relationship between prolactin secretion and the artificial photoperiod in both castrate groups with high and low levels coinciding with long and short days respectively. In addition, there was a marginally significant (P less than 0.1) relationship between prolactin secretion in the castrate ram and the stage of testicular activity in the entire rams with elevated levels associated with regressed activity. Prolactin secretion in the ovariectomized ewes was significantly (P less than 0.05) related to the phase of ovarian development with high levels associated with acyclic activity. It is concluded that LH secretion and pituitary responsiveness to exogenous GnRH were not modified by the artificial light regime. However, the changing light pattern was physiologically 'perceived' by the castrate animals as indicted by a concomitant variation in plasma prolactin concentrations.     

The Effect of oestradiol benzoate on the duration of oestrus and release of LH in ovariectomized Galway ewe lambs and adult ewes

The oestrous and LH responses by ovariectomized adult ewes (N=23) and 8-month-old ewe lambs (N=24) to i.m. injection of 10, 25, 62.5 or 156.25 μg oestradiol benzoate (ODB) were compared. The animals were primed by six daily injections of progesterone and ODB was administered 48 h after the last progesterone injection. The interval between ODB injection and onset of oestrus declined linearly (P<0.01) as the dose of ODB increased and was similar for the two age groups. The mean (±SEM) intervals to oestrus for levels of 10, 25, 62.5 and 156.25 μg ODB were 22.9±1.90, 18.0±1.33, 14.5±1.26 and 13.5±1.32 h, respectively. The duration of oestrus, determined by checking with Finnish Landrace rams at 3-h intervals, increased linearly (P<0.01) as the dose of ODB was raised and was significantly longer for ewe lambs (63.1±2.95 h) than for adult ewes (50.4±3.52 h). The overall mean (±SEM) durations of oestrus for levels of 10,25, 62.5 and 156.25 μg ODB were 16.9±5.91, 37.0±4.13, 75.2±3.94 and 97.8±4.13 h, respectively. A “pre-ovulatory” -type LH surge was observed in 32 of the 47 animals studied. The interval between injection of ODB and the beginning of the LH release declined as the dose of ODB increased (P<0.01) and was shorter (P<0.01) for ewe lambs (19.8±0.74 h) than for adult ewes (23.2±0.90 h). There was no evidence for an effect of either ewe age or dose of ODB on the maximum LH concentration observed, duration of LH discharge or total quantity of LH released. The sensitivity of the two age groups to the negative feedback effects of ODB on LH secretion was similar.     

The ovarian and hormonal response of the ewe to stimulation by the ram early in the breeding season

The introduction of Dorset rams to Romney ewes at the beginning of the breeding season (February 14 to March 1) stimulated 39% to 70% of the non-cycling ewes to ovulate. Most of the ewes that ovulated did so within 65 to 72 hours of ram introduction. The ovulations were preceded by LH peaks, the mean onset of which was 35.0±4.8 (SE) hours after ram introduction. The mean oestradiol-17β concentration per ewe ranged from 0.3 to 14.9 pg/ml plasma and there were large fluctuations among the samples collected every 3 hours. All ewes, irrespective of treatment, had similar mean concentrations of oestradiol-17β and ovarian follicular activity, and there were no changes in oestradiol-17β concentration that could be attributed to the presence of the rams.     

Continuous exposure to sexually active rams extends estrous activity in ewes in spring

Sexual activity in sheep is under photoperiodic control, which is the main environmental factor responsible for the seasonality of reproduction. However, other natural environmental factors such as presence of conspecifics can slightly influence the timing of onset and offset of the breeding season. In goats, we have found that the continuous presence of bucks that were rendered sexually active out of season by previous exposure to long days, prevented goats from displaying seasonal anestrus, which suggests that the relative contribution of photoperiod in controlling seasonal anestrus should be reevaluated in small ruminant species. The aim of this study was to assess whether the presence of sexually active rams that had been stimulated by artificial photoperiod and melatonin implants, reduces seasonal anestrus in sheep, by prolonging ovulatory activity in spring. Ewes were assigned to one of two groups (n = 16 and 15), which were housed in two separate barns, and kept in contact, either with the treated or the control rams between March and July. Vasectomized rams were either exposed to 2 months of long days followed by the insertion of three subcutaneous melatonin implants (treated rams, n = 8), or exposed to natural light conditions (control rams, n = 2). Estrus was monitored daily, and weekly plasma progesterone analyses indicated ovulatory activity. Ewes that were exposed to treated rams exhibited a higher proportion of monthly estrus than ewes exposed to the control rams (P < 0.05). Thirteen of 15 ewes (one ewe was not considered because of the presence of persistent CL) exposed to stimulated rams exhibited estrous behavior in a cyclic manner. In contrast, all ewes exposed to control rams stopped estrous activity for a period of time during the study, such that this group exhibited a significantly longer anestrous season (mean ± standard error of the mean 89 ± 9 days) than did the ewes housed with treated rams (26 ± 10 days; P < 0.0001). Among 15 ewes housed with treated rams, 13 of them exhibited continuous ovulatory activity between March and July, whereas one stopped in June and two in July. All ewes kept with control rams stopped ovulating for some time; consequently, those ewes had a longer anovulation period than did the group exposed to treated rams (3 ± 3 vs. 18 ± 7 days, respectively; P < 0.05). In conclusion, continuous exposure to sexually activated rams induced by artificial photoperiod and melatonin implants in spring extended the ovarian activity of ewes in spring, which results in an increase in estrous expression.     

Ewe effect: endocrine and testicular changes in experienced adult and inexperienced young Corriedale rams used for the ram effect

Changes in LH, FSH, and testosterone concentrations, testicular firmness and resilience, and scrotal circumference were monitored in 16 Corriedale rams (8 experienced adult and 8 inexperienced young) for 20 days during which they were used to stimulate ewes. The experiment was conducted during November (mid-non-breeding season). Increases (P<0.05) were observed in LH and testosterone concentrations and in testicular firmness and resilience during the first 4 days when rams were in permanent contact with estrual ewes. During the following 13 days, when rams were in contact with non-estrual ewes (i.e. initially estrual ewes were no longer in estrus), LH and testosterone concentrations decreased. When initially anestrous ewes exhibited estrus 17 to 20 days later, concentrations of testosterone increased. Testicular firmness and resilience remained high throughout the period. We conclude that: (1) rams used to stimulate anestrous ewes show an increase in LH and testosterone concentrations beginning at 12 h after joining, and greater concentrations are maintained while estrual ewes and mating are allowed; and (2) estrous and mating activity are probably the most important stimuli for the increase in hormone concentrations.