Nonmuscle actin ADP-ribosylated by botulinum C2 toxin caps actin filaments

The effect of nonmuscle actin ADP-ribosylated by botulinum C2 toxin on the polymerization of nonmuscle actin was investigated in order to clarify whether nonmuscle actin is converted into a capping protein by ADP-ribosylation. ADP-ribosylated actin was found to decrease the rate of polymerization of actin filaments which are free at both ends. ADP-ribosylated actin turned out to have no effect on the rate or extent of polymerization at the pointed ends of actin filaments the barbed ends of which were capped by gelsolin. The monomer concentration reached at the final stage of polymerization was similar to the critical concentration of the pointed ends of actin filaments. The results suggest that nonmuscle actin ADP-ribosylated by botulinum C2 toxin acts as a capping protein which binds to the barbed ends to inhibit polymerization.     

Gelsolin as a calcium-regulated actin filament-capping protein.

Various concentrations of gelsolin (25-100 nM) were added to 2 microM polymerized actin. The concentrations of free calcium were adjusted to 0.05-1.5 microM by EGTA/Ca2+ buffer. Following addition of gelsolin actin depolymerization was observed that was caused by dissociation of actin subunits from the pointed ends of treadmilling actin filaments and inhibition by gelsolin of polymerization at barbed ends. The time course of depolymerization revealed an initial lag phase that was followed by slow decrease of the concentration of polymeric actin to reach the final steady state polymer and monomer concentration. The initial lag phase was pronounced at low free calcium and low gelsolin concentrations. On the basis of quantitative analysis the kinetics of depolymerization could be interpreted as capping, i.e. binding of gelsolin to the barbed ends of actin filaments and subsequent inhibition of polymerization, rather than severing. The main argument for this conclusion was that even gelsolin concentrations (100 nM) that exceed the concentration of filament ends ( approximately 2 nM), cause the filaments to depolymerize at a rate that is similar to the rate of depolymerization of the concentration of pointed ends existing before addition of gelsolin. The rate of capping is directly proportional to the free calcium concentration. These experiments demonstrate that at micromolar and submicromolar free calcium concentrations gelsolin acts as a calcium-regulated capping protein but not as an actin filament severing protein, and that the calcium binding sites of gelsolin which regulate the various functions of gelsolin (capping, severing and monomer binding), differ in their calcium affinity.     

Equilibrium constant for binding of an actin filament capping protein to the barbed end of actin filaments

Depolymerization of treadmilling actin filaments by a capping protein isolated from bovine brain was used for determination of the equilibrium constant for binding of the capping protein to the barbed ends of actin filaments. When the capping protein blocks monomer consumption at the lengthening barbed ends, monomers continue to be produced at the shortening pointed ends until a new steady state is reached in which monomer production at the pointed ends is balanced by monomer consumption at the uncapped barbed ends. In this way the ratio of capped to uncapped filaments could be determined as a function of the capping protein concentration. Under the experimental conditions (100 mM KCl and 2 mM MgCl2, pH 7.5, 37 degrees C) the binding constant was found to be about 2 X 10(9) M-1. Capping proteins effect the actin monomer concentration only at capping protein concentrations far above the reciprocal of their binding constant. Half-maximal increase of the monomer concentration requires capping of about 99% of the actin filaments. A low proportion of uncapped filaments has a great weight in determining the monomer concentration because association and dissociation reactions occur at the dynamic barbed ends with higher frequencies than at the pointed ends.     

Effect of capping protein on the kinetics of actin polymerization

Acanthamoeba capping protein increased the rate of actin polymerization from monomers with and without calcium. In the absence of calcium, capping protein also increased the critical concentration for polymerization. Various models were evaluated for their ability to predict the effect of capping protein on kinetic curves for actin polymerization under conditions where the critical concentration was not changed. Several models, which might explain the increased rate of polymerization from monomers, were tested. Two models which predicted the experimental data poorly were (1) capping protein was similar to an actin filament, bypassing nucleation, and (2) capping protein fragmented filaments. Three models in which capping protein accelerated, but did not bypass, nucleation predicted the data well. In the best one, capping protein resembled a nondissociable actin dimer. Several lines of evidence have supported the idea that capping protein blocks the barbed end of actin filaments, preventing the addition and loss of monomers [Cooper, J. A., Blum, J. D., & Pollard, T. D. (1984) J. Cell Biol. 99, 217-225; Isenberg, G. A., Aebi, U., & Pollard, T. D. (1980) Nature (London) 288, 455-459]. This mechanism was also supported here by the effect of capping protein on the kinetics of actin polymerization which was nucleated by preformed actin filaments. Low capping protein concentrations slowed nucleated polymerization, presumably because capping protein blocked elongation at barbed ends of filaments. High capping protein concentrations accelerated nucleated polymerization because of capping protein's ability to interact with monomers and accelerate nucleation.     

Cdc42-induced actin filaments are protected from capping protein.

Each actin filament has a pointed and a barbed end, however, filament elongation occurs primarily at the barbed end. Capping proteins, by binding to the barbed end, can terminate this elongation. The rate of capping depends on the concentration of capping protein [1], and thus, if capping terminates elongation, the length of filaments should vary inversely with the concentration of capping protein. In cell extracts, such as those derived from neutrophils, new actin filaments can be nucleated by addition of GTPgammaS-activated Cdc42 (a small GTPase of the Rho family). To determine whether elongation of these filaments is terminated by capping, we manipulated the concentration of capping protein, the major calcium-independent capping protein in neutrophils, and observed the effects on filament lengths. Depletion of 70% of the capping protein from extracts increased the mean length of filaments elongated from spectrin-actin seeds (very short actin filaments with free barbed ends) but did not increase the mean length of filaments induced by Cdc42. Furthermore, doubling the concentration of capping protein in cell extracts by adding pure capping protein did not decrease the mean length of filaments induced by Cdc42. These results suggest that the barbed ends of Cdc42-induced filaments are protected from capping by capping protein.     

Rate constant for capping of the barbed ends of actin filaments by the gelsolin-actin complex

The rate of capping of actin filaments by the gelsolin-actin complex was measured by inhibition of elongation of the barbed ends of actin filaments. Polymeric actin (0.1-1.0 microM) was added to 0.5 microM monomeric actin and various concentrations of the gelsolin-actin complex (0.08-2.4 nM) to induce nucleated polymerization. As under the experimental conditions (2 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 37 degrees C, actin monomer concentration less than or equal to 0.5 microM) actin filaments treadmilled, filaments elongated only at the barbed ends and the gelsolin-actin complex did not nucleate actin filaments to polymerize towards the pointed ends. The rate of nucleated actin polymerization in the presence of the gelsolin-actin complex was quantitatively analyzed. The rate constant for capping of the barbed ends of actin filaments by the gelsolin-actin complex was found to be about 10(7) M-1 s-1.     

Control of actin assembly and disassembly at filament ends

The most important discovery in the field is that the Arp2/3 complex nucleates assembly of actin filaments with free barbed ends. Arp2/3 also binds the sides of actin filaments to create a branched network. Arp2/3's nucleation activity is stimulated by WASP family proteins, some of which mediate signaling from small G-proteins. Listeria movement caused by actin polymerization can be reconstituted in vitro using purified proteins: Arp2/3 complex, capping protein, actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin, and actin. actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin increases the rate at which actin subunits leave pointed ends, and capping protein caps barbed ends.     

Kinetic evidence for insertion of actin monomers between the barbed ends of actin filaments and barbed end-bound insertin, a protein purified from smooth muscle

An actin polymerization-retarding protein was isolated from chicken gizzard smooth muscle. This protein copurified with vinculin on DEAE-cellulose and gel filtration columns. The polymerization-retarding protein could be separated from vinculin by hydroxylapatite chromatography. The isolated polymerization-retarding protein lost its activity within a few days, but was stable for weeks when it was not separated from vinculin. We termed the polymerization-retarding protein "insertin". Because of the instability of the isolated insertin, we investigated the effect of insertin-vinculin on actin polymerization. Insertin-vinculin retarded nucleated actin polymerization maximally fivefold. Polymerization at the pointed ends of gelsolin-capped actin filaments was not affected by insertin-vinculin, suggesting that insertin-vinculin binds to the barbed ends, but not to the pointed ends, of actin filaments. Retarded polymerization was observed even if the actin monomer concentration was between the critical concentrations of the ends of treadmilling actin filaments. As at this low monomer concentration the pointed ends depolymerize, monomers appeared to be inserted at the barbed ends between the terminal subunit and barbed end-bound insertin molecules. Insertin-vinculin was found not to increase the actin monomer concentration to the value of the pointed ends. These observations support the conclusion that insertin is not a barbed end-capping protein but an actin monomer-inserting protein. According to a quantitative analysis of the kinetic data, all observations could be explained by a model in which two insertin molecules were assumed to bind co-operatively to the barbed ends of actin filaments. Actin monomers were found to be inserted between the barbed ends and barbed end-bound insertin molecules at a rate of about 1 x 10(6) M-1 s-1. Insertin may be an essential part of the machinery of molecules that permit treadmilling of actin filaments in living cells by insertion of actin molecules between membranes and actin filaments.     

Dynamics of capping protein and actin assembly in vitro: uncapping barbed ends by polyphosphoinositides

Bursts of actin polymerization in vivo involve the transient appearance of free barbed ends. To determine how rapidly barbed ends might appear and how long they might remain free in vivo, we studied the kinetics of capping protein, the major barbed end capper, binding to barbed ends in vitro. First, the off-rate constant for capping protein leaving a barbed end is slow, predicting a half-life for a capped barbed end of approximately 30 min. This half-life implies that cells cannot wait for capping protein to spontaneously dissociate from capped barbed ends in order to create free barbed ends. However, we find that phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and phosphatidylinositol 4- mono-phosphate (PIP) cause rapid and efficient dissociation of capping protein from capped filaments. PIP2 is a strong candidate for a second messenger regulating actin polymerization; therefore, the ability of PIP2 to remove capping protein from barbed ends is a potential mechanism for stimulating actin polymerization in vivo. Second, the on- rate constant for capping protein binding to free barbed ends predicts that actin filaments could grow to the length of filaments observed in vivo during one lifetime. Third, capping protein beta-subunit isoforms did not differ in their actin binding properties, even in tests with different actin isoforms. A major hypothesis for why capping protein beta-subunit isoforms exist is thereby excluded. Fourth, the proposed capping protein regulators, Hsc70 and S100, had no effect on capping protein binding to actin in vitro.     

Tropomodulin caps the pointed ends of actin filaments

Many proteins have been shown to cap the fast growing (barbed) ends of actin filaments, but none have been shown to block elongation and depolymerization at the slow growing (pointed) filament ends. Tropomodulin is a tropomyosin-binding protein originally isolated from red blood cells that has been localized by immunofluorescence staining to a site at or near the pointed ends of skeletal muscle thin filaments (Fowler, V. M., M. A., Sussman, P. G. Miller, B. E. Flucher, and M. P. Daniels. 1993. J. Cell Biol. 120: 411-420). Our experiments demonstrate that tropomodulin in conjunction with tropomyosin is a pointed end capping protein: it completely blocks both elongation and depolymerization at the pointed ends of tropomyosin-containing actin filaments in concentrations stoichiometric to the concentration of filament ends (Kd < or = 1 nM). In the absence of tropomyosin, tropomodulin acts as a "leaky" cap, partially inhibiting elongation and depolymerization at the pointed filament ends (Kd for inhibition of elongation = 0.1-0.4 microM). Thus, tropomodulin can bind directly to actin at the pointed filament end. Tropomodulin also doubles the critical concentration at the pointed ends of pure actin filaments without affecting either the rate of extent of polymerization at the barbed filament ends, indicating that tropomodulin does not sequester actin monomers. Our experiments provide direct biochemical evidence that tropomodulin binds to both the terminal tropomyosin and actin molecules at the pointed filament end, and is the long sought-after pointed end capping protein. We propose that tropomodulin plays a role in maintaining the narrow length distributions of the stable, tropomyosin-containing actin filaments in striated muscle and in red blood cells.     

Characterization of the ADP-ribosylation of actin by Clostridium botulinum C2 toxin and Clostridium perfringens iota toxin

Clostridium botulinum C2 toxin and Clostridium perfringens iota toxin belong to a novel family of actin ADP-ribosylating toxins. ADP-ribosylation of actin inhibits actin polymerization and G-actin-associated ATPase activity. The ADP-form of actin is ADP-ribosylated at a higher rate than actin with bound ATP. ADP-ribosylation of actin is reversible, a reaction, which is accompanied by reconstitution of actin ATPase activity.     

ADP-ribosylation of skeletal muscle and non-muscle actin by Clostridium perfringens iota toxin

The enzymatically active component ia of Clostridium perfringens iota toxin ADP-ribosylated actin in human platelet cytosol and purified platelet beta/gamma-actin, in a similar way to that been reported for component I of botulinum C2 toxin. ADP-ribosylation of cytosolic and purified actin by either toxin was inhibited by 0.1 mM phalloidin indicating that monomeric G-actin but not polymerized F-actin was the toxin substrate. Perfringens iota toxin and botulinum C2 toxin were not additive in ADP-ribosylation of platelet actin. Treatment of intact chicken embryo cells with botulinum C2 toxin decreased subsequent ADP-ribosylation of actin in cell lysates by perfringens iota or botulinum C2 toxin. In contrast to botulinum C2 toxin, perfringens iota toxin ADP-ribosylated skeletal muscle alpha-actin with a potency and efficiency similar to non-muscle actin. ADP-ribosylation of purified skeletal muscle and non-muscle actin by perfringens iota toxin led to a dose-dependent impairment of the ability of actin to polymerize.     

Processive capping by formin suggests a force-driven mechanism of actin polymerization

Regulation of actin polymerization is essential for cell functioning. Here, we predict a novel phenomenon-the force-driven polymerization of actin filaments mediated by proteins of the formin family. Formins localize to the barbed ends of actin filaments, but, in contrast to the standard capping proteins, allow for actin polymerization in the barbed direction. First, we show that the mechanism of such "leaky capping" can be understood in terms of the elasticity of the formin molecules. Second, we demonstrate that if a pulling force acts on the filament end via the leaky cap, the elastic stresses can drive actin polymerization. We estimate that a moderate pulling force of approximately 3.4 pN is sufficient to reduce the critical actin concentration required for barbed end polymerization by an order of magnitude. Furthermore, the pulling force increases the polymerization rate. The suggested mechanism of force-driven polymerization could be a key element in a variety of cellular mechanosensing devices.     

The fission yeast cytokinesis formin Cdc12p is a barbed end actin filament capping protein gated by profilin

Cytokinesis in most eukaryotes requires the assembly and contraction of a ring of actin filaments and myosin II. The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe requires the formin Cdc12p and profilin (Cdc3p) early in the assembly of the contractile ring. The proline-rich formin homology (FH) 1 domain binds profilin, and the FH2 domain binds actin. Expression of a construct consisting of the Cdc12 FH1 and FH2 domains complements a conditional mutant of Cdc12 at the restrictive temperature, but arrests cells at the permissive temperature. Cells overexpressing Cdc12(FH1FH2)p stop growing with excessive actin cables but no contractile rings. Like capping protein, purified Cdc12(FH1FH2)p caps the barbed end of actin filaments, preventing subunit addition and dissociation, inhibits end to end annealing of filaments, and nucleates filaments that grow exclusively from their pointed ends. The maximum yield is one filament pointed end per six formin polypeptides. Profilins that bind both actin and poly-l-proline inhibit nucleation by Cdc12(FH1FH2)p, but polymerization of monomeric actin is faster, because the filaments grow from their barbed ends at the same rate as uncapped filaments. On the other hand, Cdc12(FH1FH2)p blocks annealing even in the presence of profilin. Thus, formins are profilin-gated barbed end capping proteins with the ability to initiate actin filaments from actin monomers bound to profilin. These properties explain why contractile ring assembly requires both formin and profilin and why viability depends on the ability of profilin to bind both actin and poly-l-proline.     

Mechanism of action of cytochalasin B on actin

Substoichiometric cytochalasin B (CB) inhibits both the rate of actin polymerization and the interaction of actin filaments in solution. The polymerization rate is reduced by inhibition of actin monomer addition to the "barbed" end of the filaments where monomers normally add more rapidly. 2 microM CB reduces the polymerization rate by up to 90%, but has little effect on the rate of monomer addition at the slow ("pointed") end of the filaments and no effect on the rate of filament annealing. Under most ionic conditions tested, 2 microM CB reduces the steady state high shear viscosity by 10-20% and increases the steady state monomer concentration by a factor of 2.5 or less. In addition to the effects on the polymerization process, 2 microM CB strongly reduces the low shear viscosity of actin filaments alone and actin filaments cross-linked by a variety of macromolecules. This may be due to inhibition of actin filament-filament interactions which normally contribute to network formation. Since the inhibition of monomer addition and of actin filament network formation have approximately the same CB concentration dependence, a common CB binding site, probably the barbed end of the filament, may be responsible for both effects.     

Nucleated polymerization of actin from the membrane-associated ends of microvillar filaments in the intestinal brush border

We examined the nucleated polymerization of actin from the two ends of filaments that comprise the microvillus (MV) core in intestinal epithelial cells by electron microscopy. Three different in vitro preparations were used to nucleate the polymerization of muscle G- actin: (a) MV core fragments containing "barbed" and "pointed" filament ends exposed by shear during isolation, (b) isolated, membrane-intact brush borders, and (c) brush borders demembranated with Triton-X 100. It has been demonstrated that MV core fragments nucleate filament growth from both ends with a strong bias for one end. Here we identify the barbed end of the core fragment as the fast growing end by decoration with myosin subfragment one. Both cytochalasin B (CB) and Acanthamoeba capping protein block filament growth from the barbed but not the pointed end of MV core fragments. To examine actin assembly from the naturally occurring, membrane-associated ends of MV core filaments, isolated membrane-intact brush borders were used to nucleate the polymerization of G-actin. Addition of salt (75 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4) to brush borders preincubated briefly at low ionic strength with G- actin induced the formation of 0.2-0.4 micron "growth zones" at the tips of microvilli. The dense plaque at the tip of the MV core remains associated with the membrane and the presumed growing ends of the filaments. We also observed filament growth from the pointed ends of core filaments in the terminal web. We did not observe filament growth at the membrane-associated ends of core filaments when the latter were in the presence of 2 microM CB or if the low ionic strength incubation step was omitted. Addition of G-actin to demembranated brush borders, which retain the dense plaque on their MV tips, resulted in filament growth from both ends of the MV core. Again, 2 microM CB blocked filament growth from only the barbed (tip) end of the core. The dense plaque remained associated with the tip-end of the core in the presence of CB but usually was dislodged in control preparations where nucleated polymerization from the tip-end of the core occurred. Our results support the notion that microvillar assembly and changes in microvillar length could occur by actin monomer addition/loss at the barbed, membrane-associated ends of MV core filaments.     

Arabidopsis capping protein (AtCP) is a heterodimer that regulates assembly at the barbed ends of actin filaments

The precise regulation of actin filament polymerization and depolymerization is essential for many cellular processes and is choreographed by a multitude of actin-binding proteins (ABPs). In higher plants the number of well characterized ABPs is quite limited, and some evidence points to significant differences in the biochemical properties of apparently conserved proteins. Here we provide the first evidence for the existence and biochemical properties of a heterodimeric capping protein from Arabidopsis thaliana (AtCP). The purified recombinant protein binds to actin filament barbed ends with Kd values of 12-24 nM, as assayed both kinetically and at steady state. AtCP prevents the addition of profilin actin to barbed ends during a seeded elongation reaction and suppresses dilution-mediated depolymerization. It does not, however, sever actin filaments and does not have a preference for the source of actin. During assembly from Mg-ATP-actin monomers, AtCP eliminates the initial lag period for actin polymerization and increases the maximum rate of polymerization. Indeed, the efficiency of actin nucleation of 0.042 pointed ends created per AtCP polypeptide compares favorably with mouse CapZ, which has a maximal nucleation of 0.17 pointed ends per CapZ polypeptide. AtCP activity is not affected by calcium but is sensitive to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. We propose that AtCP is a major regulator of actin dynamics in plant cells that, together with abundant profilin, is responsible for maintaining a large pool of actin subunits and a surprisingly small population of F-actin.     

Ena/VASP proteins enhance actin polymerization in the presence of barbed end capping proteins

Ena/VASP proteins influence the organization of actin filament networks within lamellipodia and filopodia of migrating cells and in actin comet tails. The molecular mechanisms by which Ena/VASP proteins control actin dynamics are unknown. We investigated how Ena/VASP proteins regulate actin polymerization at actin filament barbed ends in vitro in the presence and absence of barbed end capping proteins. Recombinant His-tagged VASP increased the rate of actin polymerization in the presence of the barbed end cappers, heterodimeric capping protein (CP), CapG, and gelsolin-actin complex. Profilin enhanced the ability of VASP to protect barbed ends from capping by CP, and this required interactions of profilin with G-actin and VASP. The VASP EVH2 domain was sufficient to protect barbed ends from capping, and the F-actin and G-actin binding motifs within EVH2 were required. Phosphorylation by protein kinase A at sites within the VASP EVH2 domain regulated anti-capping and F-actin bundling by VASP. We propose that Ena/VASP proteins associate at or near actin filament barbed ends, promote actin assembly, and restrict the access of barbed end capping proteins.     

ADP-ribosylation of actin isoforms by Clostridium botulinum C2 toxin and Clostridium perfringens iota toxin

The substrate specificities of the actin-ADP-ribosylating toxins, Clostridium botulinum C2 toxin and Clostridium perfringens iota toxin were studied by using five different preparations of actin isoforms: alpha-skeletal muscle actin, alpha-cardiac muscle actin, gizzard gamma-smooth muscle actin, spleen beta- and gamma-cytoplasmic actin, and aortic smooth muscle actin containing alpha- and gamma-smooth muscle actin isoforms. C. perfringens iota toxin ADP-ribosylated all actin isoforms tested, whereas C. botulinum C2 toxin did not modify alpha-skeletal muscle actin or alpha-cardiac muscle actin. Spleen beta/gamma-cytoplasmic actin and gizzard gamma-smooth muscle actin were substrates of C. botulinum C2 toxin. In the aortic smooth muscle actin preparation, gamma-smooth muscle actin but not alpha-smooth muscle actin was ADP-ribosylated by C. botulinum C2 toxin. The data indicate that, in contrast to C. perfringens iota toxin, C. botulinum C2 toxin ADP-ribosylates only beta/gamma-cytoplasmic and gamma-smooth muscle actin and suggest that the N-terminal region of actin isoforms define the substrate specificity for ADP-ribosylation by C. botulinum C2 toxin.     

Capping Protein Terminates but Does Not Initiate Chemoattractant-induced Actin Assembly in Dictyostelium

The first step in the directed movement of cells toward a chemotactic source involves the extension of pseudopods initiated by the focal nucleation and polymerization of actin at the leading edge of the cell. We have previously isolated a chemoattractant-regulated barbed-end capping activity from Dictyostelium that is uniquely associated with capping protein, also known as cap32/34. Although uncapping of barbed ends by capping protein has been proposed as a mechanism for the generation of free barbed ends after stimulation, in vitro and in situ analysis of the association of capping protein with the actin cytoskeleton after stimulation reveals that capping protein enters, but does not exit, the cytoskeleton during the initiation of actin polymerization. Increased association of capping protein with regions of the cell containing free barbed ends as visualized by exogenous rhodamine-labeled G-actin is also observed after stimulation. An approximate threefold increase in the number of filaments with free barbed ends is accompanied by increases in absolute filament number, whereas the average filament length remains constant. Therefore, a mechanism in which preexisting filaments are uncapped by capping protein, in response to stimulation leading to the generation of free barbed ends and filament elongation, is not supported. A model for actin assembly after stimulation, whereby free barbed ends are generated by either filament severing or de novo nucleation is proposed. In this model, exposure of free barbed ends results in actin assembly, followed by entry of free capping protein into the actin cytoskeleton, which acts to terminate, not initiate, the actin polymerization transient.