氨酰-tRNA合成酶专一性识别的进化

氨酰-tRNA合成酶(AARS)是一类在蛋白质合成过程中起着重要作用的酶,它通过与tRNA及其相应氨基酸的专一性识别作用,使得基因序列能够被精确地翻译成蛋白质序列.然而,氨酰-tRNA合成酶的这种识别作用既有专一性,也具有“兼容性”.氨酰-tRNA合成酶的这种双重性质不仅与其结构的进化有关,而且还与其所处的各类生物的不同进化阶段有关.AARS似乎经历了一个由“模糊专一性”（多重专一性）到“精确专一性”（单一专一性）的演变历程.     

八肋游仆虫氨酰-tRNA合成酶基因序列分析

氨酰-tRNA合成酶 (aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, aaRS) 是蛋白质生物合成中的关键酶,能够催化特定的氨基酸和相应tRNA结合。为了研究八肋游仆虫氨酰 tRNA合成酶(Euplotes octocarinatus aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, EoaaRS)基因的种类、数目、结构及起源,本研究利用生物信息学方法,对八肋游仆虫大核基因组编码的aaRS进行了系统分析。结果表明,八肋游仆虫大核基因组共包含45个aaRS基因,可编码20种不同的aaRS蛋白。其中,EoGlnRS和EoAlaRS仅由1个基因编码,其余EoaaRS均由多个基因编码。亚细胞定位分析显示,仅8个EoaaRS具有线粒体导肽,对应于6种EoaaRS。此外,基于核酸序列分析显示,多个EoaaRS在翻译过程中需要发生编程性核糖体移码,才能形成结构完整的蛋白质产物。结构域分析表明,部分EoaaRS存在特殊结构域,暗示其可能具有氨酰化以外的新功能。进化分析揭示,2个EoGlyRS起源于古菌,而2个EoLysRS起源于细菌。本研究为后续探讨低等真核生物aaRS的结构与功能奠定了基础。     

氨酰-tRNA合成酶对tRNA的识别

氨酰-tRNA合成酶(aaRS)与tRNA的相互作用保证了蛋白质生物合成的忠实性. 氨酰-tRNA合成酶对tRNA识别的专一性依赖于aaRS特定的催化结构域和tRNA分子特异的三级结构构象. 反密码子和接受茎(包括73位)在大多数aaRS对tRNA分子的识别过程中起着关键作用, 其他部位如可变口袋、可变(茎)环等, 甚至修饰核苷酸对于一些识别过程也有重要作用.     

氨酰tRNA合成酶的分子网络和功能

氨酰tRNA合成酶是生命进化过程中最早出现的一类蛋白质,氨酰tRNA合成酶帮助氨基酸转移到相应的tRNA上,进而参与蛋白质的合成保证了生命体的严谨性和多样性.随着后基因组时代的到来,氨酰tRNA合成酶的结构和功能成为新的研究热点.结构生物学和生物信息学的研究结果表明,氨酰tRNA合成酶在真核生物体内以多聚复合物的形式行使功能,形成复杂的分子网络体系.最新的实验证据显示,氨酰tRNA合成酶不但是蛋白质合成过程中一类最重要的酶,而且参与了转录、翻译水平的调控、RNA剪接、信号传导和免疫应答等众多生命活动.     

八肋游仆虫氨酰-tRNA合成酶基因序列分析北大核心CSCD

氨酰-tRNA合成酶(aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase,aaRS)是蛋白质生物合成中的关键酶,能够催化特定的氨基酸和相应tRNA结合。为了研究八肋游仆虫氨酰-tRNA合成酶(Euplotes octocarinatus aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase,EoaaRS)基因的种类、数目、结构及起源,本研究利用生物信息学方法,对八肋游仆虫大核基因组编码的aaRS进行了系统分析。结果表明,八肋游仆虫大核基因组共包含45个aaRS基因,可编码20种不同的aaRS蛋白。其中,Eo GlnRS和Eo AlaRS仅由1个基因编码,其余EoaaRS均由多个基因编码。亚细胞定位分析显示,仅8个EoaaRS具有线粒体导肽,对应于6种EoaaRS。此外,基于核酸序列分析显示,多个EoaaRS在翻译过程中需要发生编程性核糖体移码,才能形成结构完整的蛋白质产物。结构域分析表明,部分EoaaRS存在特殊结构域,暗示其可能具有氨酰化以外的新功能。进化分析揭示,2个Eo GlyRS起源于古菌,而2个Eo LysRS起源于细菌。本研究为后续探讨低等真核生物aaRS的结构与功能奠定了基础。     

氨酰-tRNA合成酶的进化差异

大量研究显示,细菌与真核生物中的许多氨酰-tRNA合成酶(aaRS)在一些细菌与真核生物中的基因进化机制与模式、氨酰化途径和结构与功能的进化模式等方面往往有着明显的差异。通过对这些差异的深入研究,对于理解蛋白质的结构与功能的进化将是非常有帮助的。虽然造成这些差异的机制目前仍不清楚,但是,所有的这些差异似乎提示,在细菌与真核生物的一些基本生命活动过程中的某些方面,可能还存在着目前尚未被人们所认识到的较大差异。     

两种具有调节血管生成作用的氨基酰-tRNA合成酶

氨基酰-tRNA合成酶是生物体内蛋白质合成过程中的一类关键酶,它催化体内tRNA的氨基酰化反应.作为一类古老的蛋白质,氨基酰-tRNA合成酶在其漫长的进化过程中,通过其他结构域的插入或融合逐渐演化出许多新的功能.最近的研究结果表明,人酪氨酰-tRNA合成酶的片段具有促进血管生成的功能,而人色氨酰-tRNA合成酶的片段则具有抑制血管生长的功能.在哺乳动物细胞中,蛋白质的生物合成途径与细胞信号转导途径紧密相连.今后,随着对氨基酰-tRNA合成酶研究的不断深入,可以通过它们与细胞因子和信号转导相连的功能治疗人类的疾病.     

多氨基酰-tRNA合成酶复合物的发生发展

氨基酰-tRNA合成酶(aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase,aaRS)是由管家基因编码的一类古老的蛋白质,其核心功能是催化对应的tRNA和氨基酸形成氨基酰-tRNA,为蛋白质合成提供原料,从而将遗传信息翻译成蛋白质行使细胞的生物功能.随着生物进化的发展,越来越多的aaRS进化出了新的结构域,从而使aaR...     

不同年龄小白鼠全脑细胞质氨酰tRNA合成酶活力的比较

从不同年龄(20天,30天,1年)的小白鼠全脑制得细胞质混合氨酰tRNA合成酶。用异源体系(即用酵母tRNA和小白鼠全脑氨酰tRNA合成酶)测定了氨酰tRNA合成酶分别载运~3H标记的Asp、Gly、Glu、Lys和Ala的活力。结果表明除未检出tRNA~(Glu)的合成酶活力外,对其余四种氨基酸都有明显的活力,特别是年龄20天小白鼠的氨酰tRNA合成酶对~3H-Gly具有高达35％的载运活力。对~3H-Gly、~3H-Lys和~3H-Ala的载运活力有随增龄而下降的趋势,但对~3H-Asp的载运活力则随年龄增长而增高。     

哺乳动物氨基酰-tRNA合成酶的研究

1 氨基酰-tRNA合成酶及哺乳动物细胞中氨基酰 tRNA合成酶的特点 1．1 氨基酰-tRNA合成酶催化的反应氨基酰-tRNA合成酶家族(aaRS)参与生物体中的遗传解码过程。它们催化氨基酸与其对应的 tRNA之间的酯化反应,生成氨基酰-tRNA参与蛋白质的生物合成,它反应的专一性确保了蛋白质生物合成的精确性。氨基酸与其对应的tRNA之间的     

Aminoacylation of tRNA 2′- or 3′-hydroxyl by phosphoseryl- and pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetases

Class I and II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) attach amino acids to the 2′- and 3′-OH of the tRNA terminal adenosine, respectively. One exception is phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS), which belongs to Class II but attaches phenylalanine to the 2′-OH. Here we show that two Class II AARSs, O-phosphoseryl- (SepRS) and pyrrolysyl-tRNA (PylRS) synthetases, aminoacylate the 2′- and 3′-OH, respectively. Structure-based-phylogenetic analysis reveals that SepRS is more closely related to PheRS than PylRS, suggesting that the idiosyncratic feature of 2′-OH acylation evolved after the split between PheRS and PylRS. Our work completes the understanding of tRNA aminoacylation positions for the 22 natural AARSs.     

Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase contains a dispensable RNA-binding domain that contributes to the editing of noncognate aminoacyl-tRNA

Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS) is a multidomain (alphabeta)2 heterotetrameric protein responsible for synthesizing Phe-tRNA(Phe) during protein synthesis. Previous studies showed that the alpha subunit forms the catalytic core of the enzyme, while the beta subunit contains a number of autonomous structural modules with a wide range of functions including tRNA anticodon binding and editing of the misaminoacylated species Tyr-tRNA(Phe). The B2 domain of the beta subunit is a structural homologue of the EMAPII/OB fold, which has been shown in other systems to contribute to tRNA binding. Structural studies of PheRS indicated that the B2 domain is distant from bound tRNA(Phe), leaving the role of this module in question. On the basis of homology modeling with other EMAPII domain-containing proteins, the 110 amino acid B2 domain was deleted to produce PheRS deltaB2. Full-length PheRS and PheRS deltaB2 showed comparable kinetics for in vitro aminoacylation, and both enzymes complemented a defect in phenylalanylation in vivo. PheRS deltaB2 showed a 2-fold drop compared to full-length PheRS in the catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM) of Tyr-tRNA(Phe) hydrolysis, suggesting a role for the B2 domain in post-transfer editing. A comparison of tRNA binding by full-length PheRS and PheRS deltaB2 indicated that the B2 domain acts as a secondary tRNA-binding site that could contribute to editing by promoting the translocation of mischarged tRNA to the editing site of PheRS. This proposed role for the B2 domain of PheRS is consistent with previous studies, suggesting that the highly conserved EMAPII fold is able to modulate the affinity of tRNA for its primary binding site.     

Oxidation alters the architecture of the phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase editing domain to confer hyperaccuracy

High fidelity during protein synthesis is accomplished by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs). These enzymes ligate an amino acid to a cognate tRNA and have proofreading and editing capabilities that ensure high fidelity. Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS) preferentially ligates a phenylalanine to a tRNA^Phe over the chemically similar tyrosine, which differs from phenylalanine by a single hydroxyl group. In bacteria that undergo exposure to oxidative stress such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, tyrosine isomer levels increase due to phenylalanine oxidation. Several residues are oxidized in PheRS and contribute to hyperactive editing, including against mischarged Tyr-tRNA^Phe, despite these oxidized residues not being directly implicated in PheRS activity. Here, we solve a 3.6 Å cryo-electron microscopy structure of oxidized S. Typhimurium PheRS. We find that oxidation results in widespread structural rearrangements in the β-subunit editing domain and enlargement of its editing domain. Oxidization also enlarges the phenylalanyl-adenylate binding pocket but to a lesser extent. Together, these changes likely explain why oxidation leads to hyperaccurate editing and decreased misincorporation of tyrosine. Taken together, these results help increase our understanding of the survival of S. Typhimurium during human infection.     

Archaea recruited D-Tyr-tRNATyr deacylase for editing in Thr-tRNA synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) are key players in the maintenance of the genetic code through correct pairing of amino acids with their cognate tRNA molecules. To this end, some AARSs, as well as seeking to recognize the correct amino acid during synthesis of aminoacyl-tRNA, enhance specificity through recognition of mischarged aminoacyl-tRNA molecules in a separate editing reaction. Recently, an editing domain, of uncertain provenance, idiosyncratic to some archaeal ThrRSs has been characterized. Here, sequence analyses and molecular modeling are reported that clearly show a relationship of the archaea-specific ThrRS editing domains with d-Tyr-tRNATyr deacylases (DTDs). The model enables the identification of the catalytic site and other substrate binding residues, as well as the proposal of a likely catalytic mechanism. Interestingly, typical DTD sequences, common in bacteria and eukaryotes, are entirely absent in archaea, consistent with an evolutionary scheme in which DTD was co-opted to serve as a ThrRS editing domain in archaea soon after their divergence from eukaryotes. A group of present-day archaebacteria contain a ThrRS obtained from a bacterium by horizontal gene transfer. In some of these cases a vestigial version of the original archaeal ThrRS, of potentially novel function, is maintained.     

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases database

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) are at the center of the question of the origin of life. They constitute a family of enzymes integrating the two levels of cellular organization: nucleic acids and proteins. AARSs arose early in evolution and are believed to be a group of ancient proteins. They are responsible for attaching amino acid residues to their cognate tRNA molecules, which is the first step in the protein synthesis. The role they play in a living cell is essential for the precise deciphering of the genetic code. The analysis of AARSs evolutionary history was not possible for a long time due to a lack of a sufficiently large number of their amino acid sequences. The emerging picture of synthetases' evolution is a result of recent achievements in genomics [Woese,C., Olsen,G.J., Ibba,M. and S?ll,D. (2000) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 64, 202-236]. In this paper we present a short introduction to the AARSs database. The updated database contains 1047 AARS primary structures from archaebacteria, eubacteria, mitochondria, chloroplasts and eukaryotic cells. It is the compilation of amino acid sequences of all AARSs known to date, which are available as separate entries via the WWW at http://biobases.ibch.poznan.pl/aars/.     

Comparison of the Intrinsic Dynamics of Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) are an important family of enzymes that catalyze tRNA aminoacylation reaction (Ibba and Soll in Annu Rev Biochem 2000, 69:617–650) [1]. AARSs are grouped into two broad classes (class I and II) based on sequence/structural homology and mode of their interactions with the tRNA molecule (Ibba and Soll in Annu Rev Biochem 2000, 69:617–650) [1]. As protein dynamics play an important role in enzyme function, we explored the intrinsic dynamics of these enzymes using normal mode analysis and investigated if the two classes and six subclasses (Ia–c and IIa–c) of AARSs exhibit any distinct patterns of motion. The present study found that the intrinsic dynamics-based classification of these enzymes is similar to that obtained based on sequence/structural homology for most enzymes. However, the classification of seryl-tRNA synthetase was not straightforward; the internal mobility patterns of this enzyme are comparable to both IIa and IIb AARSs. This study revealed only a few general mobility patterns in these enzymes—(1) the insertion domain is generally engaged in anticorrelated motion with respect to the catalytic domain for both classes of AARSs and (2) anticodon binding domain dynamics are partly correlated and partly anticorrelated with respect to other domains for class I enzymes. In most of the class II AARSs, the anticodon binding domain is predominately engaged in anticorrelated motion with respect to the catalytic domain and correlated to the insertion domain. This study supports the notion that dynamic-based classification could be useful for functional classification of proteins.     

Crystal structure of human mitochondrial PheRS complexed with tRNA(Phe) in the active "open" state

Monomeric human mitochondrial phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS), or hmPheRS, is the smallest known enzyme exhibiting aminoacylation activity. HmPheRS consists of only two structural domains and differs markedly from heterodimeric eukaryotic cytosolic and bacterial analogs both in the domain organization and in the mode of tRNA binding. Here, we describe the first crystal structure of mitochondrial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS) complexed with tRNA at a resolution of 3.0 Å. Unlike bacterial PheRSs, the hmPheRS recognizes C74, the G1–C72 base pair, and the “discriminator” base A73, proposed to contribute to tRNA^Phe identity in the yeast mitochondrial enzyme. An interaction of the tRNA acceptor stem with the signature motif 2 residues of hmPheRS is of critical importance for the stabilization of the CCA-extended conformation and its correct placement in the synthetic site of the enzyme. The crystal structure of hmPheRS–tRNA^Phe provides direct evidence that the formation of the complex with tRNA requires a significant rearrangement of the anticodon-binding domain from the “closed” to the productive “open” state. Global repositioning of the domain is tRNA modulated and governed by long-range electrostatic interactions.     

Idiosyncrasy and identity in the prokaryotic Phe-system: crystal structure of E. coli phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase complexed with phenylalanine and AMP

The crystal structure of Phenylalanyl‐tRNA synthetase from E. coli (EcPheRS), a class II aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetase, complexed with phenylalanine and AMP was determined at 3.05 Å resolution. EcPheRS is a (αβ)₂ heterotetramer: the αβ heterodimer of EcPheRS consists of 11 structural domains. Three of them: the N‐terminus, A1 and A2 belong to the α‐subunit and B1‐B8 domains to the β subunit. The structure of EcPheRS revealed that architecture of four helix‐bundle interface, characteristic of class IIc heterotetrameric aaRSs, is changed: each of the two long helices belonging to CLM transformed into the coil‐short helix structural fragments. The N‐terminal domain of the α‐subunit in EcPheRS forms compact triple helix domain. This observation is contradictory to the structure of the apo form of TtPheRS, where N‐terminal domain was not detected in the electron density map. Comparison of EcPheRS structure with TtPheRS has uncovered significant rearrangements of the structural domains involved in tRNA^Phe binding/translocation. As it follows from modeling experiments, to achieve a tighter fit with anticodon loop of tRNA, a shift of ～5 Å is required for C‐terminal domain B8, and of ～6 to 7 Å for the whole N terminus. EcPheRSs have emerged as an important target for the incorporation of novel amino acids into genetic code. Further progress in design of novel compounds is anticipated based on the structural data of EcPheRS.     

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, the genetic code, and the evolutionary process.

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) and their relationship to the genetic code are examined from the evolutionary perspective. Despite a loose correlation between codon assignments and AARS evolutionary relationships, the code is far too highly structured to have been ordered merely through the evolutionary wanderings of these enzymes. Nevertheless, the AARSs are very informative about the evolutionary process. Examination of the phylogenetic trees for each of the AARSs reveals the following. (i) Their evolutionary relationships mostly conform to established organismal phylogeny: a strong distinction exists between bacterial- and archaeal-type AARSs. (ii) Although the evolutionary profiles of the individual AARSs might be expected to be similar in general respects, they are not. It is argued that these differences in profiles reflect the stages in the evolutionary process when the taxonomic distributions of the individual AARSs became fixed, not the nature of the individual enzymes. (iii) Horizontal transfer of AARS genes between Bacteria and Archaea is asymmetric: transfer of archaeal AARSs to the Bacteria is more prevalent than the reverse, which is seen only for the "gemini group. " (iv) The most far-ranging transfers of AARS genes have tended to occur in the distant evolutionary past, before or during formation of the primary organismal domains. These findings are also used to refine the theory that at the evolutionary stage represented by the root of the universal phylogenetic tree, cells were far more primitive than their modern counterparts and thus exchanged genetic material in far less restricted ways, in effect evolving in a communal sense.     

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases, the Genetic Code, and the Evolutionary Process

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) and their relationship to the genetic code are examined from the evolutionary perspective. Despite a loose correlation between codon assignments and AARS evolutionary relationships, the code is far too highly structured to have been ordered merely through the evolutionary wanderings of these enzymes. Nevertheless, the AARSs are very informative about the evolutionary process. Examination of the phylogenetic trees for each of the AARSs reveals the following. (i) Their evolutionary relationships mostly conform to established organismal phylogeny: a strong distinction exists between bacterial- and archaeal-type AARSs. (ii) Although the evolutionary profiles of the individual AARSs might be expected to be similar in general respects, they are not. It is argued that these differences in profiles reflect the stages in the evolutionary process when the taxonomic distributions of the individual AARSs became fixed, not the nature of the individual enzymes. (iii) Horizontal transfer of AARS genes between Bacteria and Archaea is asymmetric: transfer of archaeal AARSs to the Bacteria is more prevalent than the reverse, which is seen only for the “gemini group.” (iv) The most far-ranging transfers of AARS genes have tended to occur in the distant evolutionary past, before or during formation of the primary organismal domains. These findings are also used to refine the theory that at the evolutionary stage represented by the root of the universal phylogenetic tree, cells were far more primitive than their modern counterparts and thus exchanged genetic material in far less restricted ways, in effect evolving in a communal sense.