Cyclin gene expression and growth control in normal and neoplastic human breast epithelium

Recent advances in defining the molecular mechanisms of cell cycle control in eukaryotes provide a basis for beter understanding the hormonal control of cell proliferation in normal and neoplastic breast epithelium. It is now clear that a number of critical steps in cell cycle progression are controlled by families of serine/threonine kinases, the cdks. These kinases are activated by interactions with various cyclin gene products which form the regulatory subunits of the kinase complexes. Several families of cyclins control cell cycle progression in G₁ phase, cyclins C, D and E, or in S, G₂ and mitosis, cyclins A and B. Recent studies have defined the expression and regulation of cyclin genes in normal breast epithelial cells and in breast cancer cell lines. Following growth arrest of T-47D breast cancer cells by serum deprivation restimulation with insulin results in sequential induction of cyclin genes. Cyclin D1 mRNA increases within 1 h of mitogenic stimulation and is followed by increased expression of cyclins D3 and E in G₁ phase, cyclin A in late G₁/early S phase and cyclin B1 in G₂. Similar results were observed following epidermal growth factor stimulation of normal breast epithelial cells. Other hormones—oestrogens and progestins—and growth factors—insulin-like investigated for their effects on G₁ cyclin gene expression. In all cases there was an excellent correlation between the induction of cyclin D1 mRNA and subsequent entry into S phase. Furthermore, growth inhibition by antioestrogens and concurrent G₁ arrest were preceded by an acute decrease in cyclin D1 gene expression. These observations suggest a likely role for cyclin D1 in mediating many of the known hormonal effects on cell proliferation in breast epithelial cells.     

Drosophila Cyclin G Is a Regulator of the Notch Signalling Pathway during Wing Development

Notch signalling regulates a multitude of differentiation processes during Drosophila development. For example, Notch activity is required for proper wing vein differentiation which is hampered in mutants of either the receptor Notch, the ligand Delta or the antagonist Hairless. Moreover, the Notch pathway is involved in several aspects of Drosophila oogenesis as well. We have identified Drosophila Cyclin G (CycG) as a molecular interaction partner of Hairless, the major antagonist in the Notch signalling pathway, in vitro and in vivo. Loss of CycG was shown before to cause female sterility and to disturb the architecture of the egg shell. Nevertheless, Notch dependent processes during oogenesis appeared largely unaffected in cycG mutant egg chambers. Loss of CycG modified the dominant wing phenotypes of Notch, Delta and Hairless mutants. Whereas the Notch loss of function phenotype was ameliorated by a loss of CycG, the phenotypes of either Notch gain of function or of Delta or Hairless loss of function were enhanced. In contrast, loss of CycG had only a minor effect on the wing vein phenotype of mutants affecting the EGFR signalling pathway emphasizing the specificity of the interaction of CycG and Notch pathway members.     

Regulation of Drosophila FMRFamide neuropeptide gene expression

Physiologically important peptides are often encoded in precursors that contain several gene products; thus, regulation of expression of polypeptide proteins is crucial to transduction pathways. Differential processing of precursors by cell‐ or tissue‐specific proteolytic enzymes can yield messengers with diverse distributions and dissimilar activities. FMRFamide‐related peptides (FaRPs) are present throughout the animal kingdom and affect both neural and gastrointestinal functions. Organisms have several genes encoding numerous FaRPs with a common C‐terminal structure but different N‐terminal amino acid extensions. We have isolated SDNFMRFamide, DPKQDFMRFamide, and TPAEDFMRFamide contained in the Drosophila FMRFamide gene. To investigate the regulation of expression of FMRFamide peptides, we generated antisera to distinguish among the three neuropeptides. We have previously reported the distribution of SDNFMRFamide and DPKQDFMRFamide. In this article, we describe TPAEDFMRFamide expression. TPAEDFMRFamide antisera stain cells in embryonic, larval, pupal, and adult thoracic and abdominal ganglia. In addition, TPAEDFMRFamide‐immunoreactive material is present in a lateral protocerebrum cell in adult. Thus, TPAEDFMRFamide antisera staining of neural tissue is different from SDNFMRFamide or DPKQDFMRFamide. In addition, TPAEDFMRFamide antisera stain larval, pupal, and adult gut, while SDNFMRFamide and DPKQDFMRFamide do not. TPAEDFMRFamide immunoreactivity is present in cells stained by FMRFamide antisera. Taken together, these data support the conclusion that TPAEDFMRFamide is differentially processed from the FMRFamide polypeptide protein precursor and may act in both neural and gastrointestinal tissue. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Neurobiol 39: 347–358, 1999     

细胞周期蛋白B基因与果蝇感受器细胞谱系

果蝇感受器由特定谱系的产生所形成⒚本文报导与控制化学感受器细胞谱系特化基因ｐ ｏｘｎ 起相互调控作用的一个基因突变体的分离和鉴定的结果⒚该突变体在基因纯合状态时,其刚毛上的化学和机械感受器的数目和形态出现异常⒚分子和细胞遗传学研究表明 Ｐ 转位子插入到 ｃｙｃ Ｂ 基因的 ５′调控区域内⒚     

Translational control of maternal Cyclin B mRNA by Nanos in the Drosophila germline

In the Drosophila embryo, Nanos and Pumilio collaborate to repress the translation of hunchback mRNA in the somatic cytoplasm. Both proteins are also required for repression of maternal Cyclin B mRNA in the germline; it has not been clear whether they act directly on Cyclin B mRNA, and if so, whether regulation in the presumptive somatic and germline cytoplasm proceeds by similar or fundamentally different mechanisms. In this report, we show that Pumilio and Nanos bind to an element in the 3' UTR to repress Cyclin B mRNA. Regulation of Cyclin B and hunchback differ in two significant respects. First, Pumilio is dispensable for repression of Cyclin B (but not hunchback) if Nanos is tethered via an exogenous RNA-binding domain. Nanos probably acts, at least in part, by recruiting the CCR4-Pop2-NOT deadenylase complex, interacting directly with the NOT4 subunit. Second, although Nanos is the sole spatially limiting factor for regulation of hunchback, regulation of Cyclin B requires another Oskar-dependent factor in addition to Nanos. Ectopic repression of Cyclin B in the presumptive somatic cytoplasm causes lethal nuclear division defects. We suggest that a requirement for two spatially restricted factors is a mechanism for ensuring that Cyclin B regulation is strictly limited to the germline.     

Regulation of Drosophila FMRFamide neuropeptide gene expression.

Physiologically important peptides are often encoded in precursors that contain several gene products; thus, regulation of expression of polypeptide proteins is crucial to transduction pathways. Differential processing of precursors by cell- or tissue-specific proteolytic enzymes can yield messengers with diverse distributions and dissimilar activities. FMRFamide-related peptides (FaRPs) are present throughout the animal kingdom and affect both neural and gastrointestinal functions. Organisms have several genes encoding numerous FaRPs with a common C-terminal structure but different N-terminal amino acid extensions. We have isolated SDNFMRFamide, DPKQDFMRFamide, and TPAEDFMRFamide contained in the Drosophila FMRFamide gene. To investigate the regulation of expression of FMRFamide peptides, we generated antisera to distinguish among the three neuropeptides. We have previously reported the distribution of SDNFMRFamide and DPKQDFMRFamide. In this article, we describe TPAEDFMRFamide expression. TPAEDFMRFamide antisera stain cells in embryonic, larval, pupal, and adult thoracic and abdominal ganglia. In addition, TPAEDFMRFamide-immunoreactive material is present in a lateral protocerebrum cell in adult. Thus, TPAEDFMRFamide antisera staining of neural tissue is different from SDNFMRFamide or DPKQDFMRFamide. In addition, TPAEDFMRFamide antisera stain larval, pupal, and adult gut, while SDNFMRFamide and DPKQDFMRFamide do not. TPAEDFMRFamide immunoreactivity is present in cells stained by FMRFamide antisera. Taken together, these data support the conclusion that TPAEDFMRFamide is differentially processed from the FMRFamide polypeptide protein precursor and may act in both neural and gastrointestinal tissue.