Human and mouse cementum proteins immunologically related to enamel proteins

SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, immunoblot and amino acid composition analyses were applied to human and mouse acellular cementum proteins immunologically related to enamelins and amelogenins. In this analysis, anti-mouse amelogenin, anti-human enamelin and synthetic peptide (e.g., -LPPHPGHPGYIC-) antibodies were shown to cross-react with tooth crown-derived enamelin with a molecular mass of 72,000 Da (72 kDa), amelogenins (26 kDa), and also to four human cementum proteins (72, 58, 50 and 26 kDa) and two mouse cementum proteins (72 and 26 kDa). Each of the antibodies recognized tooth root-derived cementum polypeptides which share one or more epitopes with tooth crown-derived enamel proteins. The molecular mass and isoelectric points for crown-derived and root-derived enamel-related proteins were similar. Analysis of human and mouse cementum proteins revealed a characteristic amino acid composition enriched in glutamyl, serine, glycine, alanine, proline, valine and leucine residues; compared to the major enamel protein amelogenin, cementum proteins were low in proline, histidine and methionine. The human and mouse putative intermediate cementum proteins appear to represent a distinct class of enamel-related proteins. Moreover, these results support the hypothesis that epithelial root sheath epithelia express several cementum proteins immunologically related to canonical enamel proteins.     

The effects of LAMP1 and LAMP3 on M180 amelogenin uptake, localization and amelogenin mRNA induction by amelogenin protein

We previously demonstrated that the uptake of M180 amelogenin protein in dental epithelial cells (HAT-7) results in increased levels of amelogenin mRNA through enhanced mRNA stabilization. To determine the processes involved in the uptake of extracellular M180 amelogenin by cells and in amelogenin intracellular trafficking in the amelogenin protein-mediated amelogenin mRNA expression pathway, we investigated the effects of LAMP1 and LAMP3, which are candidate M180 amelogenin receptors, on M180 amelogenin uptake, localization and amelogenin mRNA induction by amelogenin protein, using anti-LAMP-1 and anti-LAMP-3 antibodies and siRNA analysis. The results indicate that LAMP3 blocking by anti-LAMP-3 decreases M180 amelogenin uptake, but does not affect amelogenin mRNA induction by amelogenin protein, suggesting that LAMP3 is related to amelogenin degradation. Down-regulation by siRNA of LAMP1, which is the receptor for small amelogenin protein (LRAP), does not affect M180 amelogenin uptake, localization or amelogenin mRNA induction by amelogenin protein. Thus, while LAMP1 is the specific receptor for LRAP, it is not a receptor for M180 amelogenin. These findings will aid further research into the understanding of M180 amelogenin function and expression.     

Interaction of amelogenin with hydroxyapatite crystals: An adherence effect through amelogenin molecular self-association

At the secretory stage of tooth enamel formation the majority of the organic matrix is composed of amelogenin proteins that are believed to provide the scaffolding for the initial carbonated hydroxyapatite crystals to grow. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the interaction between amelogenins and growing apatite crystals. Two in vitro strategies were used: first, we examined the influence of amelogenins as compared to two other macromolecules, on the kinetics of seeded growth of apatite crystals; second, using transmission electron micrographs of the crystal powders, based on a particle size distribution study, we evaluated the effect of the macromolecules on the aggregation of growing apatite crystals. Two recombinant amelogenins (rM179, rM166), the synthetic leucine-rich amelogenin polypeptide (LRAP), poly(L -proline), and phosvitin were used. It was shown that the rM179 amelogenin had some inhibitory effect on the kinetics of calcium hydroxyapatite seeded growth. The inhibitory effect, however, was not as destructive as that of other macromolecules tested. The degree of inhibition of the macromolecules was in the order of phosvitin < LRAP < poly(L -proline) < rM179 < rM166. Analysis of particle size distribution of apatite crystal aggregates indicated that the full-length amelogenin protein (rM179) caused aggregation of the growing apatite crystals more effectively than other macromolecules. We propose that during the formation of hydroxyapatite crystal clusters, the growing apatite crystals adhere to each other through the molecular self-association of interacting amelogenin molecules. The biological implications of this adherence effect with respect to enamel biomineralization are discussed. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopoly 46: 225–238, 1998     

Truncated amelogenin and LRAP transgenes improve Amelx null mouse enamel

Amelogenin is the most abundant enamel protein involved in enamel mineralization. Our goal was to determine whether all three regions of amelogenin (N-terminus, C-terminus, central core) are required for enamel formation. Amelogenin RNA is alternatively spliced, resulting in at least 16 different amelogenin isoforms in mice, with M180 and LRAP expressed most abundantly. Soon after secretion by ameloblasts, M180 is cleaved by MMP20 resulting in C-terminal truncated (CTRNC) amelogenin. We aimed to determine whether the 2 transgenes (Tg), LRAP and CTRNC together, can improve LRAPTg/Amelx −/− and CTRNCTg/Amelx −/− enamel thickness and prism organization, which were not rescued in Amelx −/− enamel. We generated CTRNCTg/LRAPTg/Amelx −/− mice and analyzed developing and mature incisor and molar enamel histologically, by microCT, SEM and microhardness testing. CTRNCTg and LRAPTg overexpression together significantly improved the enamel phenotype of LRAPTg/Amelx −/− and CTRNCTg/Amelx −/− mouse enamel, however enamel microhardness was recovered only when M180Tg was expressed, alone or with LRAPTg. We determined that both LRAP and CTRNC, which together express all three regions of the amelogenin protein (N-terminus, C-terminus and hydrophobic core) contribute to the final enamel thickness and prism organization in mice.     

Histidine tag fusion increases expression levels of active recombinant amelogenin in Escherichia coli

Amelogenin is a dental enamel matrix protein involved in formation of dental enamel. In this study, we have expressed two different recombinant murine amelogenins in Escherichia coli: the untagged rM179, and the histidine tagged rp(H)M180, identical to rM179 except that it carries the additional N-terminal sequence MRGSHHHHHHGS. The effects of the histidine tag on expression levels, and on growth properties of the amelogenin expressing cells were studied. Purification of a crude protein extract containing rp(H)M180 was also carried out using IMAC and reverse-phase HPLC. The results of this study showed clearly that both growth properties and amelogenin expression levels were improved for E. coli cells expressing the histidine tagged amelogenin rp(H)M180, compared to cells expressing the untagged amelogenin rM179. The positive effect of the histidine tag on amelogenin expression is proposed to be due to the hydrophilic nature of the histidine tag, generating a more hydrophilic amelogenin, which is more compatible with the host cell. Human osteoblasts treated with the purified rp(H)M180 showed increased levels of secreted osteocalcin, compared to untreated cells. This response was similar to cells treated with enamel matrix derivate, mainly composed by amelogenin, suggesting that the recombinant protein is biologically active. Thus, the histidine tag favors expression and purification of biologically active recombinant amelogenin.     

Partial rescue of the amelogenin null dental enamel phenotype

The amelogenins are the most abundant secreted proteins in developing dental enamel. Enamel from amelogenin (Amelx) null mice is hypoplastic and disorganized, similar to that observed in X-linked forms of the human enamel defect amelogenesis imperfecta resulting from amelogenin gene mutations. Both transgenic strains that express the most abundant amelogenin (TgM180) have relatively normal enamel, but strains of mice that express a mutated amelogenin (TgP70T), which leads to amelogenesis imperfecta in humans, have heterogeneous enamel structures. When Amelx null (KO) mice were mated with transgenic mice that produce M180 (TgM180), the resultant TgM180KO offspring showed evidence of rescue in enamel thickness, mineral density, and volume in molar teeth. Rescue was not observed in the molars from the TgP70TKO mice. It was concluded that a single amelogenin protein was able to significantly rescue the KO phenotype and that one amino acid change abrogated this function during development.     

Selachian tooth development: II. Immunolocalization of amelogenin polypeptides in epithelium during secretory amelogenesis in Squalus acanthias

We have determined the distribution of amelogenin polypeptides in an order of elasmobranchs using indirect immunofluorescence with rabbit polyclonal antibodies prepared to purified murine amelogenins. We find that amelogenins are definitely present within the inner enamel epithelium prior to the production of the extracellular matrix component termed "enameloid" (row II developing tooth organs). During subsequent stages of selachian tooth development (row III tooth organs), immunofluorescence staining data indicated localization of amelogenin antigens within epithelium as well as the enameloid extracellular matrix. The results from these immunohistochemical studies suggest that the 16-20 kdalton amelogenins, which are characteristic of murine inner enamel epithelial cells undergoing terminal biochemical differentiation into secretory ameloblasts, may also be regarded as molecular markers for amelogenesis in developing teeth in the spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias.     

Amelogenin sequence and enamel biomineralization in Rana pipiens

The amelogenin gene contributes the majority of tooth enamel proteins and plays a significant role in enamel biomineralization. While several mammalian and reptilian amelogenins have been cloned and sequenced, basal vertebrate amelogenin evolution remains to be understood. In order to start elucidating the structure and function of amelogenins in the evolution of enamel, the leopard frog (Rana pipiens) was used as a model. Tissues from Rana pipiens teeth were analyzed for enamel structure and RNA extracts were processed for sequence analysis. Electron microscopy revealed that Rana pipiens enamel contains long and parallel crystals similar to mammalian enamel, while immunoreactions confirmed the site-specific localization of cross-reactive amelogenins in Rana pipiens enamel. Sequencing of amelogenin PCR products revealed a 782bp cDNA with a 546-nucleotide coding sequence encoding 181 amino acids. The homology of the newly discovered Rana pipiens amelogenin nucleotide and amino acid sequence with the published mouse amelogenin was 38.6% and 45%, respectively. These findings report the first complete amelogenin cDNA sequence in amphibians and indicate a close homology between mammalian enamel formation and Rana pipiens enamel biomineralization.     

Identification and characterization of a squamate reptilian amelogenin gene: Iguana iguana

As the principal components of the developing tooth enamel matrix, amelogenins play a significant role in tooth enamel formation and organization. In order to elucidate the structure and function of amelogenins in the evolution of enamel, we have selected the Iguana iguana as a squamate model organism. Here we report the first complete squamate amelogenin sequence available as of yet and document unique features of Iguana amelogenins and enamel. Transmission electron microscopy documented randomly oriented Iguana enamel crystals during the elongation phase compared with organized enamel crystal patterns at comparable stages in mammals. Sequencing of PCR amplified products revealed a full-length I. iguana amelogenin cDNA containing 877 nucleotides with a 564 nucleotide coding sequence encoding 187 amino acids. The homologies of the newly discovered I. iguana amelogenin amino acid sequence with the published mouse, caiman (Palaeosuchus), and snake (Elaphe) amelogenin were 41.3%, 53.5%, and 55.5%, respectively. On Western blots one major protein with a molecular weight of 24 kDa, and two minor proteins with molecular weights of 28 and 13.5 kDa, respectively, were detected based on the cross-reactivity of antisera against recombinant Rana pipiens amelogenin proteins. Sequence analysis revealed a moderate sequence homology between mammalian and reptilian amelogenin genes. A significant alteration was the deletion of the hydrophilic GSP sequence from exon 3 in the mouse sequence resulting in a conversion to a hydrophobic region in Iguana. Together, these findings identified a novel amelogenin cDNA sequence in the squamate reptilian I. iguana and functional implications for the evolution of amelogenins and enamel in squamates.     

Maturation ameloblasts of the porcine tooth germ do not express amelogenin

 Amelogenins are the most abundant constituent in the enamel matrix of developing teeth. Recent investigations of rodent incisors and molar tooth germs revealed that amelogenins are expressed not only in secretory ameloblasts but also in maturation ameloblasts, although in relatively low levels. In this study, we investigated expression of amelogenin in the maturation stage of porcine tooth germs by in situ hybridization and immunocytochemistry. Amelogenin mRNA was intensely expressed in ameloblasts from the differentiation to the transition stages, but was not detected in maturation stage ameloblasts. C-terminal specific anti-amelogenin antiserum, which only reacts with nascent amelogenin molecules, stained ameloblasts from the differentiation to the transition stages. This antiserum also stained the surface layer of immature enamel at the same stages. At the maturation stage, no immunoreactivity was found within the ameloblasts or the immature enamel. These results indicate that, in porcine tooth germs, maturation ameloblasts do not express amelogenins, suggesting that newly secreted enamel matrix proteins from the maturation ameloblast are not essential to enamel maturation occurring at the maturation stage. Accepted: 14 January 1999     

Altered amelogenin self-assembly based on mutations observed in human X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta (AIH1)

A hallmark of biological systems is a reliance on protein assemblies to perform complex functions. We have focused attention on mammalian enamel formation because it relies on a self-assembling protein complex to direct mineral habit. The principle protein of enamel is amelogenin, a 180-amino acid hydrophobic protein that self-assembles to form nanospheres. We have used independent technical methods, consisting of the yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assay and surface plasmon resonance (SPR), to demonstrate the importance of amelogenin self-assembly domains. In addition, we have analyzed mutations in amelogenin observed in patients with amelogenesis imperfecta who demonstrate defects in enamel formation. Assessments of self-assembly of these mutant amelogenins by either SPR or Y2H assay yield concordant data. These data support the conclusion that the amelogenin amino-terminal self-assembly domain is essential to the creation of an enamel extracellular organic matrix capable of directing mineral formation. It also suggests that a pathway through which point mutations in the amelogenin protein can adversely impact on the formation of the enamel organ is by disturbing self-assembly of the organic matrix. These data support the utilization of the Y2H assay to search for protein interactions among extracellular matrix proteins that contribute to biomineralization and provide functional information on protein-protein and protein-mineral interactions.     

Enamel biomineralization defects result from alterations to amelogenin self-assembly

Enamel formation is a powerful model for the study of biomineralization. A key feature common to all biomineralizing systems is their dependency upon the biosynthesis of an extracellular organic matrix that is competent to direct the formation of the subsequent mineral phase. The major organic component of forming mouse enamel is the 180-amino-acid amelogenin protein (M180), whose ability to undergo self-assembly is believed to contribute to biomineralization of vertebrate enamel. Two recently defined domains (A and B) within amelogenin appear essential for this self-assembly. The significance of these two domains has been demonstrated previously by the yeast two-hybrid system, atomic force microscopy, and dynamic light scattering. Transgenic animals were used to test the hypothesis that the self-assembly domains identified with in vitro model systems also operate in vivo. Transgenic animals bearing either a domain-A-deleted or domain-B-deleted amelogenin transgene expressed the altered amelogenin exclusively in ameloblasts. This altered amelogenin participates in the formation an organic enamel extracellular matrix and, in turn, this matrix is defective in its ability to direct enamel mineralization. At the nanoscale level, the forming matrix adjacent to the secretory face of the ameloblast shows alteration in the size of the amelogenin nanospheres for either transgenic animal line. At the mesoscale level of enamel structural hierarchy, 6-week-old enamel exhibits defects in enamel rod organization due to perturbed organization of the precursor organic matrix. These studies reflect the critical dependency of amelogenin self-assembly in forming a competent enamel organic matrix and that alterations to the matrix are reflected as defects in the structural organization of enamel.     

Amelogenin-deficient mice display an amelogenesis imperfecta phenotype.

Dental enamel is the hardest tissue in the body and cannot be replaced or repaired, because the enamel secreting cells are lost at tooth eruption. X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta (MIM 301200), a phenotypically diverse hereditary disorder affecting enamel development, is caused by deletions or point mutations in the human X-chromosomal amelogenin gene. Although the precise functions of the amelogenin proteins in enamel formation are not well defined, these proteins constitute 90% of the enamel organic matrix. We have disrupted the amelogenin locus to generate amelogenin null mice, which display distinctly abnormal teeth as early as 2 weeks of age with chalky-white discoloration. Microradiography revealed broken tips of incisors and molars and scanning electron microscopy analysis indicated disorganized hypoplastic enamel. The amelogenin null phenotype reveals that the amelogenins are apparently not required for initiation of mineral crystal formation but rather for the organization of crystal pattern and regulation of enamel thickness. These null mice will be useful for understanding the functions of amelogenin proteins during enamel formation and for developing therapeutic approaches for treating this developmental defect that affects the enamel.     

The COOH terminus of the amelogenin, LRAP, is oriented next to the hydroxyapatite surface

The organic matrix in forming enamel consists largely of the amelogenin protein self-assembled into nanospheres that are necessary to guide the formation of the unusually long and highly ordered hydroxyapatite (HAP) crystallites that constitute enamel. Despite its ability to direct crystal growth, the interaction of the amelogenin protein with HAP is unknown. However, the demonstration of growth restricted to the c-axis suggests a specific protein-crystal interaction, and the charged COOH terminus is often implicated in this function. To elucidate whether the COOH terminus is important in the binding and orientation of amelogenin onto HAP, we have used solid state NMR to determine the orientation of the COOH terminus of an amelogenin splice variant, LRAP (leucine-rich amelogenin protein), which contains the charged COOH terminus of the full protein, on the HAP surface. These experiments demonstrate that the methyl 13C-labeled side chain of Ala46 is 8.0 A from the HAP surface under hydrated conditions, for the protein with and without phosphorylation. The experimental results provide direct evidence orienting the charged COOH-terminal region of the amelogenin protein on the HAP surface, optimized to exert control on developing enamel crystals.     

Identification and characterization of enamel proteinases isolated from developing enamel. Amelogeninolytic serine proteinases are associated with enamel maturation in pig.

During tooth formation nearly all of the protein matrix of enamel is removed before final mineralization. To study this process, enamel proteins and proteinases were extracted from pig enamel at different stages of tooth development. In the enamel maturation zones, the major enamel matrix proteins, the amelogenins, were rapidly processed and removed. Possibly associated with this process in vivo are two groups of proteinases which were identified in the enamel extracts by enzymography using amelogenin-substrate and gelatin-substrate polyacrylamide gels and by the degradation in vitro of guanidinium chloride-extracted amelogenins. One group of proteinases with gelatinolytic activity consisted of several neutral metalloendoproteinases having Mr values from 62,000 to 130,000. These proteinases were inactive against amelogenins, casein and albumin, and were present in approximately equal proportions in enamel at all developmental stages. In the other group, two serine proteinases, with apparent non-reduced Mr of 31,000 and 36,000 exhibited amelogeninolytic activity. The substrate preference of the enamel serine proteinases was indicated by their limited degradation of casein and their inability to degrade gelatin and albumin. Contrasting with the distribution of the metalloendoproteinase enzymes, the serine proteinases were found only in the enamel scrapings taken from late-maturing enamel. The amelogenin degradation patterns in vivo, observed in the enamel scrapings, were similar to those produced in assays in vitro using partially purified fractions of enamel proteinases and amelogenin substrate. Together, these data strongly indicate an important role for the serine proteinases, and possibly the gelatinolytic proteinases, in the organized processing of the enamel protein matrix during enamel formation.     

A solution NMR investigation into the murine amelogenin splice-variant LRAP (Leucine-Rich Amelogenin Protein)

Amelogenins are the dominant proteins present in ameloblasts during the early stages of enamel biomineralization, making up > 90% of the matrix protein. Along with the full-length protein there are several splice-variant isoforms of amelogenin present including LRAP (Leucine-Rich Amelogenin Protein), a protein that consists of the first 33 and the last 26 residues of full-length amelogenin. Using solution-state NMR spectroscopy we have assigned the ¹H-¹⁵N HSQC spectrum of murine LRAP (rp(H)LRAP) in 2% acetic acid at pH 3.0 by making extensive use of previous chemical shift assignments for full-length murine amelogenin (rp(H)M180). This correlation was possible because LRAP, like the full-length protein, is intrinsically disordered under these solution conditions. The major difference between the ¹H-¹⁵N HSQC spectra of rp(H)M180 and rp(H)LRAP was an additional set of amide resonances for each of the seven non-proline residues between S12* and Y12 near the N-terminus of rp(H)LRAP indicating that the N-terminal region of LRAP exists in two different conformations. Analysis of the proline carbon chemical shifts suggests that the molecular basis for the two states is not a cis-trans isomerization of one or more of the proline residues in the N-terminal region. Starting from 2% acetic acid, where rp(H)LRAP was monomeric in solution, NaCl addition effected residue specific changes in molecular dynamics manifested by the reduction in intensity and disappearance of ¹H-¹⁵N HSQC cross peaks. As observed for the full-length protein, these perturbations may signal early events governing supramolecular self-assembly of rp(H)LRAP into nanospheres. However, the different patterns of ¹H-¹⁵N HSQC cross peak perturbation between rp(H)LRAP and rp(H)M180 in high salt suggest that the termini may behave differently in their respective nanospheres, and perhaps, these differences contribute to the cell signaling properties attributable to LRAP but not to the full-length protein.     

Self-assembly properties of recombinant engineered amelogenin proteins analyzed by dynamic light scattering and atomic force microscopy

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis together with atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging was applied to investigate the supramolecular self-assembly properties of a series of recombinant amelogenins. The overall objective was to ascertain the contribution of certain structural motifs in amelogenin to protein-protein interactions during the self-assembly process. Mouse amelogenins lacking either amino- or carboxy-terminal domains believed to be involved in self-assembly and amelogenins having single or double amino acid mutations identical to those found in cases of amelogenesis imperfecta were analyzed. The polyhistidine-containingfull-length recombinant amelogenin protein [rp(H)M180] generated nanospheres with monodisperse size distribution (hydrodynamic radius of 20.7 +/- 2.9 nm estimated from DLS and 16.1 +/- 3.4 nm estimated from AFM images), comparable to nanospheres formed by full-length amelogenin rM179 without the polyhistidine domain, indicating that this histidine modification did not interfere with the self-assembly process. Deletion of the N-terminal self-assembly domain from amelogenin and their substitution by a FLAG epitope ("A"-domain deletion) resulted in the formation of assemblies with a heterogeneous size distribution with the hydrodynamic radii of particles ranging from 3 to 38 nm. A time-dependent dynamic light scattering analysis of amelogenin molecules lacking amino acids 157 through 173 and containing a hemagglutinin epitope ("B"-domain deletion) resulted in the formation of particles (21.5 +/- 6.8 nm) that fused to form larger particles of 49.3 +/- 4.3 nm within an hour. Single and double point mutations in the N-terminal region resulted in the formation of larger and more heterogeneous nanospheres. The above data suggest that while the N-terminal A-domain is involved in the molecular interactions for the formation of nanospheres, the carboxy-terminal B-domain contributes to the stability and homogeneity of the nanospheres, preventing their fusion to larger assemblies. These in vitro findings support the notion that the proteolytic cleavage of amelogenin at amino- and carboxy-terminii occurring during enamel formation influences amelogenin to amelogenin interactions during self-assembly and hence alters the structural organization of the developing enamel extracellular matrix, thus affecting enamel biomineralization.