Durable power of attorney for health care. Are we ready for it?

Health care professionals need to be well informed about advance directives for medical care in the event a patient becomes incapacitated. The Patient Self-Determination Act requires that all patients be advised of their options at the time of hospital admission. Hospitals and health care professionals will need to work together to plan for implementing this law. We surveyed 215 physicians, nurses, and social workers at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center about the California advance directive, the Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care. Attitudes were generally positive. All of the social workers had heard of the durable power of attorney directive, but 36% of physicians and nurses had never heard of it and an additional 20% had no experience with one. For respondents who had heard of the directive, the mean knowledge score was 6.35 of a possible 10 (5 predicted by chance). Respondents brought up the issue of durable power of attorney with patients before a crisis only 19% of the time and determined whether one had been signed for only 16% of older patients in hospital. The most commonly cited reasons for failure to discuss this with patients were lack of proper forms, pamphlets, or a place to refer a patient. Of those who had ever seen such a document in use, 42% were aware of a problem with it at some time. Whereas attitudes toward advance directives are positive, many physicians and nurses had little knowledge of the Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care and were poorly equipped to discuss it with patients. We encourage educating hospital staff to prepare for the enactment of the Patient Self-Determination Act. We also recommend that the concerns raised by professionals about the use of a durable power of attorney be addressed.     

Qualitative study of views of health professionals and patients on guided self management plans for asthma

ObjectivesTo explore the views held by general practitioners, practice nurses, and patients about the role of guided self management plans in asthma care.DesignQualitative study using nine focus groups that each met on two occasions.SettingSouth Wales.Subjects13 asthma nurses, 11 general practitioners (six with an interest in asthma), and 32 patients (13 adults compliant with treatment, 12 non-compliant adults, and seven teenagers).ResultsNeither health professionals nor patients were enthusiastic about guided self management plans, and, although for different reasons, almost all participants were ambivalent about their usefulness or relevance. Most professionals opposed their use. Few patients reported sustained use, and most felt that plans were largely irrelevant to them. The attitudes associated with these views reflect the gulf between the professionals'' concept of the “responsible asthma patient” and the patients'' view.ConclusionsAttempts to introduce self guided management plans in primary care are unlikely to be successful. A more patient centred, patient negotiated plan is needed for asthma care in the community.     

In Memoriam

The Patient Self-Determination Act was implemented in December 1991. Before and after its implementation, we used a structured interview of 302 randomly selected patients to determine their awareness, understanding, and use of advance directives. Implementation of the Act did not have a major effect on these. Although more than 90% of patients were aware of the living will, only about a third selected the correct definition or the correct circumstances in which it applied, and less than 20% of patients had completed one. About a third of patients were aware of a Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care and chose the correct definition, and about half identified the correct circumstances in which it applies; less than 10% had completed such a document. Surprisingly, patients who said they had completed advance directives did not demonstrate better understanding of these documents. Our results indicate that many patients, including some who have completed advance directives, do not fully understand them. It may be unwise to regard these documents as carefully considered, compelling statements of patients'' preferences. Appropriate responses to our findings include increased public education, revising state statutes to bring them into congruence with public perception, and expanding the dialogue between physicians and patients.     

Do Spanish Hospital Professionals Educate Their Patients About Advance Directives?

It is unknown whether hospital-based medical professionals in Spain educate patients about advance directives (ADs). The objective of this research was to determine the frequency of hospital-based physicians’ and nurses’ engagement in AD discussions in the hospital and which patient populations merit such efforts. A short question-and-answer-based survey of physicians and nurses taking care of inpatients was conducted at a university hospital in Madrid, Spain. In total, 283 surveys were collected from medical professionals, of whom 71 per cent were female, with an average age of thirty-four years. Eighty-four per cent had never educated patients about ADs because of lack of perceived responsibility, time, or general knowledge of ADs. Patient populations that warranted AD discussions included those with terminal illnesses (77 per cent), chronic diseases (61 per cent), and elderly patients (43 per cent). Regarding degree of AD understanding in medical professionals: 57 per cent of medical professionals claimed sufficient general knowledge of ADs, 19 per cent understood particulars regarding AD document creation, and 16 per cent were aware of AD regulatory policies. Engagement in AD discussions was considered important by 83 per cent of medical professionals, with 79 per cent interested in participating in such discussions themselves. The majority of hospital physicians and nurses do not educate their patients about ADs, despite acknowledging their importance. Patient populations of highest priority included those with terminal diseases or chronic illness or who are of advanced age.     

Decision-making for long-term tube-feeding in cognitively impaired elderly people

BACKGROUND: The decision to start long-term tube-feeding in elderly people is complex. The process by which such decisions are made is not well understood. The authors examined the factors involved in the decision to start long-term tube-feeding in cognitively impaired older people from the perspective of the substitute decision-maker. METHODS: A telephone survey was administered to the substitute decision-makers of tube-fed patients over 65 years old in chronic care facilities in Ottawa. Subjects were recruited from September 1997 to March 1998. Patients were incapable of making their own decisions about tube-feeding. Data were collected on sociodemographic factors, patients'' health status, advance directives, communication between the substitute decision-maker and the health care team, and the decision-maker''s perceived goals of tube-feeding and satisfaction with the decision regarding tube-feeding. RESULTS: Among the 57 cases in which the patient was eligible for inclusion in the study, 46 substitute decision-makers agreed to participate. Most of the patients had not given advance directives, and only 26 substitute decision-makers (56.5%) were confident that the patient would want to be tube-fed. A physician spoke with the substitute decision-maker about tube-feeding for 15 minutes or less in 17 cases (37.0%) and not at all in 13 cases (28.3%). Most of the substitute decision-makers (39 [84.8%]) felt that they understood the benefits of tube-feeding, but less than half (21 [45.7%]) felt that they understood the risks. The prevention of aspiration and the prolongation of life were the medical benefits most often cited as reasons for tube-feeding. Just over half (24 [52.2%]) of the substitute decision-makers felt that they had received adequate support from the health care team in making the decision. Substitute decision-makers of patients less than 75 years old were more likely than those of older patients to feel supported (odds ratio [OR] 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-17.9). Compared with the physician''s making the decision independently, substitute decision-makers felt more supported if they primarily made the decision (OR 16.5, 95% CI 2.7-101.4) or if they made the decision together with the physician (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.0-27.9). Most (20 [43.5%]) of the substitute decision-makers did not feel that tube-feeding improved the patient''s quality of life, and less than half (21 [45.7%]) indicated that they would choose the intervention for themselves. INTERPRETATION: The substitute decision-making process for tube-feeding in cognitively impaired elderly people is limited by a need for advance directives, lack of confidence in substituted judgement and poor communication of information to the substitute decision-maker by the health care team.     

Understanding of elderly patients' resuscitation preferences by physicians and nurses.

We compared the understanding by family physicians and nurses of their elderly outpatients'' preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mechanical ventilation under 3 scenarios reflecting varying qualities of life. Physicians and nurses correctly predicted patients'' treatment preferences in from 59% to 84% and 53% to 78% of cases, respectively, for the various decisions. For most decisions, neither physicians nor nurses were significantly more accurate in their predictions than expected by chance alone. Moreover, nurses and physicians did not significantly agree with one another in their predictions of patients'' preferences for any of these decisions. These results suggest that while nurses'' and physicians'' perceptions of patients'' preferences for life-sustaining treatment are not necessarily similar, neither nurses nor physicians systematically understand their elderly patients'' resuscitation preferences.     

Standardised measures of needs,stigma and informal care in schizophrenia using a bottom-up,cross-cultural approach

Background There is a lack of instruments to measure the needs, stigma and informal care of people with schizophrenia that take account of sociocultural variation and patients'' and formal and informal carers'' opinions and experiences.Aims To develop questionnaires to measure stigma, needs and informal (non-professional) care for people with schizophrenia.Method We undertook the study in seven countries and in English, Spanish and Portuguese. We first held focus group discussions with patients, formal carers (professionals) and informal carers (family and friends) in Spain, the UK, Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Venezuela to elicit the main dimensions of needs, stigma and informal care. We then held nominal group discussions about these dimensions with patients, family members and professionals in Spain, Portugal and the UK, to develop the instruments.Results Three hundred and three people participated in 46 focus groups and results were discussed in three nominal groups, each involving eight participants. Three instruments were developed in this iterative process: needs for care (46 items), stigma (38 items) and informal care (20 items).Conclusions These instruments are based on service users'' and carers'' views and experiences and have cross-cultural validity. They will have application in assessment of outcomes for people with schizophrenia and their families.     

Family physicians' attitudes toward advance directives.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the attitudes toward, the experience with and the knowledge of advance directives of family physicians in Ontario. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: A questionnaire was mailed to 1000 family physicians, representing a random sample of one-third of the active members of the Ontario College of Family Physicians; 643 (64%) responded. RESULTS: In all, 86% of the physicians favoured the use of advance directives, but only 19% had ever discussed them with more than 10 patients. Most of the physicians agreed with statements supporting the use of advance directives and disagreed with statements opposing their use. Of the respondents 80% reported that they had never used a directive in managing an incompetent patient. Of the physicians who responded that they had such experience, over half said that they had not always followed the directions contained in the directive. The proportions of physicians who responded that certain patient groups should be offered the opportunity to complete an advance directive were 96% for terminally ill patients, 95% for chronically ill patients, 85% for people with human immunodeficiency virus infection, 77% for people over 65 years of age, 43% for all adults, 40% for people admitted to hospital on an elective basis and 33% for people admitted on an emergency basis. The proportions of physicians who felt that the following strategies would encourage them to offer advance directives to their patients were 92% for public education, 90% for professional education, 89% for legislation protecting physicians against liability when following a directive, 80% for legislation supporting the use of directives, 79% for hospital policy supporting the use of directives, 73% for reimbursement for time spent discussing directives with patients and 64% for hospital policy requiring that all patients be routinely offered the opportunity to complete a directive at the time of admission. CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians favour advance directives but use them infrequently. Most physicians support offering them to terminally or chronically ill patients but not to all patients at the time of admission to hospital. Although governments emphasize legislation, most physicians believe that public and professional education programs would be at least as likely as legislation to encourage them to offer advance directives to their patients.     

Discussing randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy: evaluation of a Cancer Research UK training programme

Objective To evaluate a training intervention aimed at improving healthcare professionals'' communication with cancer patients about randomised clinical trials.Design Before and after evaluation of training programme.Setting Members of the National Cancer Research Network, Scottish Trials Network, and the Welsh Cancer Trials NetworkParticipants 101 healthcare professionals (33 clinicians and 68 research nurses).Intervention Four modules delivered by a trained facilitator using videotapes and interactive exercises to cover general issues about discussing randomised clinical trials with patients, problems specific to adjuvant trials, trials with palliation as the goal, and trials where patients had a strong preference for one treatment arm.Main outcome measures Before and after the intervention, participants were videotaped discussing a trial with an actor portraying a patient. These consultations were assessed for presence of information required by good clinical practice guidelines. The actor patients gave an assessment after each interview. Participants reported their self confidence about key aspects of trial discussion.Results Analysis of the videotaped consultations showed that, after intervention, significantly more participants displayed key communication behaviours such as explaining randomisation (69 v 81, odds ratio 2.33, P = 0.033), checking patients'' understanding (11 v 31, odds ratio 3.22, P = 0.002), and discussing standard treatment (73 v 88, odds ratio 4.75, P = 0.005) and side effects (69 v 85, odds ratio 3.29, P = 0.006). Participants'' self confidence increased significantly (P < 0.001) across all areas. Actor patients'' ratings of participants'' communication showed significant improvements for 12/15 key items.Conclusion This intensive 8 hour intervention significantly improved participants'' confidence and competence when communicating about randomised clinical trials.     

Hospital policies on life-sustaining treatments and advance directives in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and content of hospital policies on life-sustaining treatments (cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], mechanical ventilation, dialysis, artificial nutrition and hydration, and antibiotic therapy for life-threatening infections) and advance directives in Canada. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mailed survey. SETTING: Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Chief executive officers or their designates at public general hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Information regarding the existence of policies on life-sustaining treatments or advance directives and the content of the policies. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed for 697 (79.2%) of the 880 hospitals surveyed. Of the 697 respondents 362 (51.9%) sent 388 policies; 355 (50.9%) sent do-not-resuscitate (DNR) policies (i.e., policies that addressed CPR alone or in combination with other life-sustaining treatments). Of the 388 policies 327 (84.3%) addressed CPR alone, 28 (7.2%) addressed CPR plus other life-sustaining treatments, 10 (2.6%) addressed advance directives, and the remaining 23 (5.9%) addressed other life-sustaining treatments. Of the 355 DNR policies 1 (0.3%) stated that routine discussion with patients is required, 315 (88.7%) restricted their scope to terminally or hopelessly ill patients, 187 (52.7%) mentioned futility, 29 (8.2%) mentioned conflict resolution, 9 (2.5%) and 13 (3.7%) required explicit communication of the decision to the competent patient or family of the incompetent patient respectively, 110 (31.0%) authorized the family of an incompetent patient to rescind the DNR order, 224 (63.1%) authorized the nursing staff to do so, and 217 (61.1%) authorized physicians to do so. CONCLUSIONS: Although about half of the public general hospitals surveyed had DNR policies few had policies regarding other life-sustaining treatments or advance directives. Existing policies could be improved if hospitals encouraged routine advance discussions, removed the restriction to terminally or hopelessly ill patients, scrutinized the use of the futility standard, stipulated procedures for conflict resolution, explicitly required communication of the decision to competent patients or substitute decision-makers of incompetent patients and scrutinized the provision allowing families and health care professionals to rescind the wishes of now incompetent patients.     

Which physicians make home visits and why? A survey

BACKGROUND: Recent changes in the North American health care system and certain demographic factors have led to increases in home care services. Little information is available to identify the strategies that could facilitate this transformation in medical practice and ensure that such changes respond adequately to patients'' needs. As a first step, the authors attempted to identify the major factors influencing physicians'' home care practices in the Quebec City area. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was sent by mail to all 696 general practitioners working in the Quebec City area. The questionnaire was intended to gather information on physicians'' personal and professional characteristics, as well as their home care practice (practice volume, characteristics of both clients and home visits, and methods of patient assessment and follow-up). RESULTS: A total of 487 physicians (70.0%) responded to the questionnaire, 283 (58.1%) of whom reported making home visits. Of these, 119 (42.0%) made fewer than 5 home visits per week, and 88 (31.1%) dedicated 3 hours or less each week to this activity. Physicians in private practice made more home visits than their counterparts in family medicine units and CLSCs (centres locaux des services communautaires [community centres for social and health services]) (mean 11.5 v. 5.8 visits per week), although the 2 groups reported spending about the same amount of time on this type of work (mean 5.6 v. 5.0 hours per week). The proportion of visits to patients in residential facilities or other private residences was greater for private practitioners than for physicians from family medicine units and CLSCs (29.7% v. 18.9% of visits), as were the proportions of visits made at the patient''s request (28.0% v. 14.2% of visits) and resulting from an acute condition (21.4% v. 16.0% of visits). The proportion of physicians making home visits at the request of a CLSC was greater for those in family medicine units and CLSCs than for those in private practice (44.0% v. 11.3% of physicians), as was the proportion of physicians making home visits at the request of a colleague (18.0% v. 4.5%) or at the request of hospitals (30.0% v. 6.8%). Physicians in family medicine units and CLSCs did more follow-ups at a frequency of less than once per month than private practitioners (50.9% v. 37.1% of patients), and they treated a greater proportion of patients with cognitive disorders (17.2% v. 12.6% of patients) and palliative care needs (13.7% v. 8.6% of patients). Private practitioners made less use of CLSC resources to assess home patients or follow them. Male private practitioners made more home visits than their female counterparts (mean 12.8 v. 8.3 per week), although they spent an almost equal amount of time on this activity (mean 5.7 v. 5.2 hours per week). INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that practice patterns for home care vary according to the physician''s practice setting and sex. Because of foreseeable increases in the numbers of patients needing home care, further research is required to evaluate how physicians'' practices can be adapted to patients'' needs in this area.     

Palliative care: views of patients and their families.

OBJECTIVE--To investigate the current problems and needs of terminally ill cancer patients and their family members, and to discover their views of hospital, community, and support team services. DESIGN--Prospective study of patients and families by questionnaire interviews in the patients'' homes. SETTING--Inner London and north Kent (London suburbs). SUBJECTS--65 Patients, each with a member of their family or a career. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Ratings of eight current problems and ratings and comments on three services-hospital doctors and nurses, general practitioners and district nurses, and the support team staff-obtained after a minimum of two weeks'' care from palliative care support teams. RESULTS--Effect of anxiety on the patient''s nearest career. and symptom control were rated as the most severe current problems by both patients and families; a few patients and families identified other severe problems. Families'' ratings of pain control, symptom control, and effect of anxiety on the patient were significantly worse than the patients'' ratings (p less than 0.05). Support teams received the most praise, being rated by 58 (89%) patients and 59 (91%) of family members as good as excellent. General practitioners and district nurses were rated good or excellent by 46 (71%) patients and 46 (71%) family members, but six (9%) in each group rated the service as poor or very bad, and ratings in the inner London district were significantly worse than those in the outer London district. Hospital doctors and nurses were rated good or excellent by 22 (34%) patients and 35 (54%) of family members, and 14 (22%) patients and 15 (23%) family members rated this service as poor or very bad. Negative comments referred to communication (especially at diagnosis), coordination of services, the attitude of the doctor, delays in diagnosis, and difficulties in getting doctors to visit at home. Family members were more satisfied with the services than were patients. CONCLUSIONS--Palliative care needs to include both the patient and family because the needs of the family may exceed those of the patient. Support teams and some hospital and community doctors and nurses met the perceived needs of dying patients and families, but better education and organisation of services are needed.     

ADVANCE DIRECTIVES IN TURKEY'S CULTURAL CONTEXT: EXAMINING THE POTENTIAL BENEFITS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PATIENT RIGHTS

Advance directives are not a part of the healthcare service in Turkey. This may be related with the fact that paternalism is common among the healthcare professionals in the country, and patients are not yet integrated in the decision‐making process adequately. However, starting from the enactment of the Regulation of Patient Rights in 1998, this situation started to change. While the paternalist tradition still appears to be strong in Turkey, the Ministry of Health has been taking concrete measures in the recent years to ensure that patient rights are implemented in healthcare practice. Therefore, Turkey now seems to be in a transitional period where a move towards a more patient‐autonomy centred approach is being supported by the regulatory authorities, as well as the academic circles and the public at large. In the light of this background, this paper aims to examine the potential benefits of advance directives, particularly with regard to their possible effect in the clinical decision‐making process of Turkey's context. It will be argued that advance directives, if correctly understood and implemented in the right settings, may be beneficial, particularly for improving communication between patients and healthcare professionals and for implementing of the right to refuse treatment.     

Should living wills be legalized?

Living wills allow patients to state their wish to die and not be kept alive through the use of medications, artificial means or "heroic" measures. They have been made legal documents in 38 states in the United States. Living wills permit advance expression of a patient''s wishes, promote effective communication and demonstrate respect for the patient as a person. Problems with legal recognition of such wills include the need for agreement on fundamental terms, possible restriction of patients'' rights, limitation of options in decision-making and possible negative effects on the physician-patient relationship. Before legislation is enacted, public and professional attitudes toward the care of terminally ill patients should be assessed. All health care professionals should receive better education in this area, and palliative care services should be made more widely available. Only if these measures fail should living wills be made legal documents in Canada.     

AIDS in children

The application of medical quality assurance principles to ambulatory patient care using the traditional methods of medical chart audit, process review, and physician education has yielded generally disappointing results in improving patient care and physician performance. Newer methods assist physicians by providing patient and medical reference data at the time of a patient''s visit. Techniques for tracking treatment outcomes and patients'' test results and for providing instructions to patients may improve both care and patients'' and physicians'' satisfaction.This feature appears regularly in THE WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE. It is intended to cover recent developments in a broad range of issues that will have an impact—either directly or indirectly—on clinical practice. Occasionally the seminars may include informed speculation about likely future developments.     

Managing erotic feelings in the physician-patient relationship.

In spite of prohibitions against the sexual involvement of physicians with their patients, erotic feelings sometimes arise in physician-patient relationships. The authors suggest that physicians can protect themselves and their patients from the harm that results from sexual involvement by establishing behavioural limits for their professional relationships, responding to patients'' sexual overtures in a firm but nonjudgemental manner, examining their own sexual feelings rationally, seeking consultation if necessary and terminating the relationship if sexual feelings are compromising patient care. The challenge for physicians is to acknowledge that sexual feelings can arise and to manage such feelings for the sake of their own and their patients'' well-being.     

Withholding the artificial administration of fluids and food from elderly patients with dementia: ethnographic study

ObjectiveTo clarify the practice of withholding the artificial administration of fluids and food from elderly patients with dementia in nursing homes.DesignQualitative, ethnographic study in two phases.Setting10 wards in two nursing homes in the Netherlands.Participants35 patients with dementia, eight doctors, 43 nurses, and 32 families.ResultsThe clinical course of dementia was considered normal and was rarely reason to begin the artificial administration of fluids and food in advanced disease. Fluids and food seemed to be given mainly when there was an acute illness or a condition that needed medical treatment and which required hydration to be effective. The medical condition of the patient, the wishes of the family, and the interpretations of the patients'' quality of life by their care providers were considered more important than living wills and policy agreements.ConclusionsDoctors'' decisions about withholding the artificial administration of fluids and food from elderly patients with dementia are influenced more by the clinical course of the illness, the presumed quality of life of the patient, and the patient''s medical condition than they are by advanced planning of care. In an attempt to understand the wishes of the patient doctors try to create the broadest possible basis for the decision making process and its outcome, mainly by involving the family.

What is already known on this topic

Debate has focused on whether it is beneficial to withhold the artificial administration of fluids and food from patients with advanced dementia

What this study adds

The course of dementia, the patient''s quality of life, and the patient''s current medical condition influence doctors'' decision making more than advanced planning of careDoctors try to create the broadest possible basis for the decision making process and its outcome, mainly by involving the family     

Survey of "do not resuscitate" orders in a district general hospital.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the local use of written "Do not resuscitate" orders to designate inpatients unsuitable for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac arrest. DESIGN--Point prevalence questionnaire survey of inpatients'' medical and nursing records. SETTING--10 acute medical and six acute surgical wards of a district general hospital. PARTICIPANTS--Questionnaires were filled in anonymously by nurses and doctors working on the wards surveyed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Responses to questionnaire items concerning details about each patient, written orders not to resuscitate in the medical case notes and nursing records, whether prognosis had been discussed with patients'' relatives, whether a "crash call" was perceived as appropriate for each patient, and whether the "crash team" would be called in the event of arrest. RESULTS--Information was obtained on 297 (93.7%) of 317 eligible patients. Prognosis had been discussed with the relatives of 32 of 88 patients perceived by doctors as unsuitable for resuscitation. Of these 88 patients, 24 had orders not to resuscitate in their medical notes, and only eight of these had similar orders in their nursing notes. CONCLUSIONS--In the absence of guidelines on decisions about resuscitation, orders not to resuscitate are rarely included in the notes of patients for whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation is thought to be inappropriate. Elective decisions not to resuscitate are not effectively communicated to nurses. There should be more discussion of patients'' suitability for resuscitation between doctors, nurses, patients, and patients'' relatives. Suitability for resuscitation should be reviewed on every consultant ward round.     

Subspecialty Differences in Responding to Patient Death–Comparing Cardiologists With Oncologists

Cardiac deaths are more likely to be unanticipated than cancer deaths by patients, their families, and their physicians. We hypothesized that differing physician attitudes toward dying patients may affect the degree of expectation of death. To evaluate differences in attitudes and behaviors among subspecialists, we surveyed a randomly selected population of California subspecialists; 44 of 136 (32%) of cardiologists and 91 of 167 (55%) of oncologists responded. Oncologists experienced three times as many deaths as cardiologists and reported having discussed code status more often with patients who died. Cardiologists'' patients'' deaths were more often unexpected and occurred more frequently in intensive care units. In addition, their patients were more likely to be given cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Oncologists reported being more comfortable dealing with dying patients and having less desire to avoid them. When presented with patient scenarios, however, cardiologists'' and oncologists'' responses were similar when discussing and estimating prognosis and likelihood of successful therapy.