Angular and spectral sensitivity of fly photoreceptors. I. Integrated facet lens and rhabdomere optics

Three optical components of a fly's eye determine the angular sensitivity of the photoreceptors: the light diffracting facet lens, the wave-guiding rhabdomere and the light-absorbing visual pigment in the rhabdomere. How the integrated optical system of the fly eye shapes the angular sensitivity curves is quantitatively analyzed in five steps: (1) scalar diffraction theory for low Fresnel-number lenses is applied to four different facet lenses, with diameter 10, 20, 40, and 80 micro m, respectively, assuming a constant F-number of 2.2; (2) optical waveguide theory is used to calculate waveguide modes propagating in circular cylindrical rhabdomeres with diameter 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 micro m, respectively; (3) the excitation of waveguide modes is studied with the tip of the waveguide positioned in the focal plane as well as outside this plane; (4) the light absorption from the various propagated modes by the visual pigment in the rhabdomere is calculated as a function of the angle of the incident light wave; and (5) the angular sensitivity of the photoreceptor is obtained by normalizing the total light absorption. Four wavelengths are considered: 300, 400, 500 and 600 nm. The analysis shows that the wavelength dependency of the lens diffraction is strongly compensated by that of the waveguide modes, an effect which is further enhanced by the decrease in light absorption when the mode number increases. The angular sensitivity of fly photoreceptors is robust to defocus and largely wavelength independent for all except very slender rhabdomeres.     

Spectral effects of the pupil in fly photoreceptors

Summary Photoreceptors of flies contain pigment granules which upon illumination of the receptors migrate towards the rhabdomere and act as a longitudinal pupil. Data in the literature concerning the effect of the pupil on the spectral sensitivity are contradictory. Therefore spectral sensitivity ofMusca photoreceptors upon light adaptation was reinvestigated.The change in spectral sensitivity of fly photoreceptors upon light adaptation as measured by Hardie (1979) was confirmed. Taking into account waveguide optics this change was explained from absorbance spectra of pupillary granules, measured by microspectrophotometry in squash preparations. Furthermore the pupil absorbance spectrum determined in vivo (Stavenga et al. 1973) was interpreted. The absence of a change in spectral sensitivity upon light adaptation measured by pupillary reflexion (Bernard and Stavenga 1979) is explained by a local-triggering of the pupil.     

Calcium-activated Myosin V closes the Drosophila pupil

Approximately 40 years ago, an elegant automatic-gain control was revealed in compound eye photoreceptors: In bright light, an assembly of small pigment granules migrates to the cytoplasmic face of the photosensitive membrane organelle, the rhabdomere, where they attenuate waveguide propagation along the rhabdomere. This migration results in a "longitudinal pupil" that reduces rhodopsin exposure by a factor of 0.8 log units. Light-induced elevation of cytosolic free Ca(2+) triggers the migration of pigment granules, and pigment granules fail to migrate in a mutant deficient in photoactivated TRP calcium channels. However, the mechanism that moves photoreceptor pigment granules remains elusive. Are the granules actively pulled toward the rhabdomere upon light, or are they instead actively pulled into the cytoplasm in the absence of light? Here we show that Ca(2+)-activated Myosin V (MyoV) pulls pigment granules to the rhabdomere. Thus, one of MyoV's several functions is also as a sensory-adaptation motor. In vitro, Ca(2+) both activates and inhibits MyoV motility; in vivo, its role is undetermined. This first demonstration of an in vivo role for Ca(2+) in MyoV activity shows that in Drosophila photoreceptors, Ca(2+) stimulates MyoV motility.     

Angular and spectral sensitivity of fly photoreceptors. II. Dependence on facet lens F-number and rhabdomere type in<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Drosophila</Emphasis>

A wave-optical model for the integrated facet lens-rhabdomere system of fly eyes is used to calculate the effective light power in the rhabdomeres when the eye is illuminated with a point light source or with an extended source. Two rhabdomere types are considered: the slender rhabdomeres of R7,8 photoreceptors and the wider, but tapering R1-6 rhabdomeres. The angular sensitivities of the two rhabdomere types have been calculated as a function of F-number and wavelength by fitting Gaussian functions to the effective light power. For a given F-number, the angular sensitivity broadens with wavelength for the slender rhabdomeres, but it stays approximately constant for the wider rhabdomeres. The integrated effective light power increases with the rhabdomere diameter, but it is for both rhabdomere types nearly independent of the light wavelength and F-number. The results are used to interpret the small F-number of Drosophila facet lenses. Presumably the small head puts a limit to the size of the facet lens and favors a short focal length.     

Colour in the eyes of insects

Many insect species have darkly coloured eyes, but distinct colours or patterns are frequently featured. A number of exemplary cases of flies and butterflies are discussed to illustrate our present knowledge of the physical basis of eye colours, their functional background, and the implications for insect colour vision. The screening pigments in the pigment cells commonly determine the eye colour. The red screening pigments of fly eyes and the dorsal eye regions of dragonflies allow stray light to photochemically restore photoconverted visual pigments. A similar role is played by yellow pigment granules inside the photoreceptor cells which function as a light-controlling pupil. Most insect eyes contain black screening pigments which prevent stray light to produce background noise in the photoreceptors. The eyes of tabanid flies are marked by strong metallic colours, due to multilayers in the corneal facet lenses. The corneal multilayers in the gold-green eyes of the deer fly Chrysops relictus reduce the lens transmission in the orange-green, thus narrowing the sensitivity spectrum of photoreceptors having a green absorbing rhodopsin. The tapetum in the eyes of butterflies probably enhances the spectral sensitivity of proximal long-wavelength photoreceptors. Pigment granules lining the rhabdom fine-tune the sensitivity spectra.     

Effects of energy deprivation on the fly pupil mechanism: evidence for a rigor state

The energy dependence of the pupil pigment-migrations in the fly Musca domestica was studied in live animals, using optical techniques and nitrogen-gas induced anoxia. The results obtained can be summarized in 3 points:

1. Energy deficiency can make the pupil mechanism stop in any state, extreme or intermediate.
2. Anoxia induced during intermittent stimulation makes the pupil stop in the closed state (aggregated pigment granules).
3. During long-term anoxia the pupil very slowly opens (dispersal of pigment granules), irrespective of ambient intensity.

The slow anoxic opening (point 3) is more than 1000 times slower than that predicted for free diffusion of pigment granules in water. Assuming realistic values of cytoplasm viscosity, this implies that anoxia causes the pigment granules to attach to rigid structures in the cells, in analogy with the rigor state in anoxic muscles. The rigor phenomenon in the pupil mechanism prevents experimental discrimination between active and passive processes of pigment migration. Normal pupil opening has a time course which agrees reasonably with a passive diffusion process, but it is argued that an active transportation of granules away from the rhabdom is more likely in the dark adapted eye.     

The contribution of a sensitizing pigment to the photosensitivity spectra of fly rhodopsin and metarhodopsin.

Most of the photoreceptors of the fly compound eye have high sensitivity in the ultraviolet (UV) as well as in the visible spectral range. This UV sensitivity arises from a photostable pigment that acts as a sensitizer for rhodopsin. Because the sensitizing pigment cannot be bleached, the classical determination of the photosensitivity spectrum from measurements of the difference spectrum of the pigment cannot be applied. We therefore used a new method to determine the photosensitivity spectra of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin in the UV spectral range. The method is based on the fact that the invertebrate visual pigment is a bistable one, in which rhodopsin and metarhodopsin are photointerconvertible. The pigment changes were measured by a fast electrical potential, called the M potential, which arises from activation of metarhodopsin. We first established the use of the M potential as a reliable measure of the visual pigment changes in the fly. We then calculated the photosensitivity spectrum of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin by using two kinds of experimentally measured spectra: the relaxation and the photoequilibrium spectra. The relaxation spectrum represents the wavelength dependence of the rate of approach of the pigment molecules to photoequilibrium. This spectrum is the weighted sum of the photosensitivity spectra of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin. The photoequilibrium spectrum measures the fraction of metarhodopsin (or rhodopsin) in photoequilibrium which is reached in the steady state for application of various wavelengths of light. By using this method we found that, although the photosensitivity spectra of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin are very different in the visible, they show strict coincidence in the UV region. This observation indicates that the photostable pigment acts as a sensitizer for both rhodopsin as well as metarhodopsin.     

Ectoplasm, ghost in the R cell machine?

Drosophila photoreceptors (R cells) are an extreme instance of sensory membrane amplification via apical microvilli, a widely deployed and deeply conserved operation of polarized epithelial cells. Developmental rotation of R cell apices aligns rhabdomere microvilli across the optical axis and enables enormous membrane expansion in a new, proximal distal dimension. R cell ectoplasm, the specialized cortical cytoplasm abutting the rhabdomere is likewise enormously amplified. Ectoplasm is dominated by the actin-rich terminal web, a conserved operational domain of the ancient vesicle-transport motor, Myosin V. R cells harness Myosin V to move two distinct cargoes, the biosynthetic traffic that builds the rhabdomere during development, and the migration of pigment granules that mediates the adaptive "longitudinal pupil" in adults, using two distinct Rab proteins. Ectoplasm further shapes a distinct cortical endosome compartment, the subrhabdomeral cisterna (SRC), vital to normal cell function. Reticulon, a protein that promotes endomembrane curvature, marks the SRC. R cell visual arrestin 2 (Arr2) is predominantly cytoplasmic in dark-adapted photoreceptors but on illumination it translocates to the rhabdomere, where it quenches ongoing photosignaling by binding to activated metarhodopsin. Arr2 translocation is "powered" by diffusion; a motor is not required to move Arr2 and ectoplasm does not obstruct its rapid diffusion to the rhabdomere.     

Coexpression of spectrally distinct rhodopsins in Aedes aegypti R7 photoreceptors

The retina of the mosquito Aedes aegypti can be divided into four regions based on the non-overlapping expression of a UV sensitive Aaop8 rhodopsin and a long wavelength sensitive Aaop2 type rhodopsin in the R7 photoreceptors. We show here that another rhodopsin, Aaop9, is expressed in all R7 photoreceptors and a subset of R8 photoreceptors. In the dorsal region, Aaop9 is expressed in both the cell body and rhabdomere of R7 and R8 cells. In other retinal regions Aaop9 is expressed only in R7 cells, being localized to the R7 rhabdomere in the central and ventral regions and in both the cell body and rhabdomere within the ventral stripe. Within the dorsal-central transition area ommatidia do not show a strict pairing of R7-R8 cell types. Thus, Aaop9 is coexpressed in the two classes of R7 photoreceptors previously distinguished by the non-overlapping expression of Aaop8 and Aaop2 rhodopsins. Electroretinogram analysis of transgenic Drosophila shows that Aaop9 is a short wavelength rhodopsin with an optimal response to 400-450 nm light. The coexpressed Aaop2 rhodopsin has dual wavelength sensitivity of 500-550 nm and near 350 nm in the UV region. As predicted by the spectral properties of each rhodopsin, Drosophila photoreceptors expressing both Aaop9 and Aaop2 rhodopsins exhibit a uniform sensitivity across the broad 350-550 nm light range. We propose that rhodopsin coexpression is an adaptation within the R7 cells to improve visual function in the low-light environments in which Ae. aegypti is active.     

Photostable pigments within the membrane of photoreceptors and their possible role

In the majority of ommatidia of the fly, the membrane of the central rhabdomere contains — besides the rhodopsin — a photostable pigment. Due to its selective absorption in the blue spectral range, this pigment (possibly a carotene) could modify the spectral sensitivity of the central receptor cells. It furthermore may change the fluidity of the microvillus membrane and hence affect the alignment of rhodopsin molecules. Indirect evidence for a possible role of the photostable pigment as an antenna-pigment for rhodopsin is discussed.Presented at the EMBO-Workshop on Transduction Mechanism of Photoreceptors, Jülich, Germany, October 4–8, 1976     

Spectral sensitivity of the weakly discharging electric fish Gnathonemus petersi using its electric organ discharges as the response measure

The spectral sensitivity of the weakly electric mormyrid fish Gnathonemus petersi was investigated under dark- and light-adapted conditions using a transient change (startle) in its electric organ discharge (EOD) rate as response measure. The startle was resistant to habituation and graded with light intensity. Under both lighting conditions, the fish responded optimally to a monochromatic light of 525 nm. A porphyropsin pigment (520–540₂) appears to mediate spectral sensitivity over most of the visible spectrum. However, G. petersi responded more strongly to 625- and 675-nm lights (dark- and light-adapted fish) and a 725-nm light (light-adapted fish only) than predicted by the presence of a single rod pigment. These data suggest that at least one additional visual pigment (most likely of cone cells) maximally absorbing long wavelength light (600 nm or longer) is present. The spectral sensitivity data are consistent with the sensitivity hypothesis in that heightened sensitivity to long wavelength light is predicted for fish living in blackwater habitats which are characterized typically by low light levels and transmission of predominantly long wavelengths. Histology of the retina showed photoreceptors grouped into bundles and ensheathed by pigment epithelial cells. Our results demonstrated a functional visual sense in a species of fish much better known and studied for its electrosensory and electromotor abilities.     

Properties of pupil mechanisms in owl-fly Ascalaphus macaronius (Neuroptera)

Regulation of light flux by pupil mechanisms in the UV-sensitive superposition eye of owl-fly Ascalaphus macaronius (Neuroptera) was studied with a fast reflection microspectrophotometric technique. The spectral sensitivity of pupil reaction, which was calculated on the basis of changes of transient amplitude reflection, was almost identical with the one of Deilephila eye. This indicates that in spite of different life styles and spectral sensitivities of photoreceptors, pupil closing is triggered by the same photosensitive structure in both eyes. By measuring the spectra of reflected light from the Ascalaphus eye between 400 and 700 nm after different dark periods following light stimulation, it was established that the restoration of reflection was much faster in the red than in the blue spectral range. Based on this, we propose that two different pupil mechanisms with different spectral absorption characteristics are involved in light-flux regulation. Fast-reacting pupil is probably represented by screening pigment migration in the secondary pigment cells and a slow blue-absorbing system by the activity in primary pigment cells. The importance of two different pupils for the photoregeneration of visual pigment is discussed. Accepted: 1 October 1998     

Possible Involvement of Cone Opsins in Distinct Photoresponses of Intrinsically Photosensitive Dermal Chromatophores in Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus

Dermal specialized pigment cells (chromatophores) are thought to be one type of extraretinal photoreceptors responsible for a wide variety of sensory tasks, including adjusting body coloration. Unlike the well-studied image-forming function in retinal photoreceptors, direct evidence characterizing the mechanism of chromatophore photoresponses is less understood, particularly at the molecular and cellular levels. In the present study, cone opsin expression was detected in tilapia caudal fin where photosensitive chromatophores exist. Single-cell RT-PCR revealed co-existence of different cone opsins within melanophores and erythrophores. By stimulating cells with six wavelengths ranging from 380 to 580 nm, we found melanophores and erythrophores showed distinct photoresponses. After exposed to light, regardless of wavelength presentation, melanophores dispersed and maintained cell shape in an expansion stage by shuttling pigment granules. Conversely, erythrophores aggregated or dispersed pigment granules when exposed to short- or middle/long-wavelength light, respectively. These results suggest that diverse molecular mechanisms and light-detecting strategies may be employed by different types of tilapia chromatophores, which are instrumental in pigment pattern formation.     

Metarhodopsin control by arrestin,light-filtering screening pigments,and visual pigment turnover in invertebrate microvillar photoreceptors

The visual pigments of most invertebrate photoreceptors have two thermostable photo-interconvertible states, the ground state rhodopsin and photo-activated metarhodopsin, which triggers the phototransduction cascade until it binds arrestin. The ratio of the two states in photoequilibrium is determined by their absorbance spectra and the effective spectral distribution of illumination. Calculations indicate that metarhodopsin levels in fly photoreceptors are maintained below ~35% in normal diurnal environments, due to the combination of a blue-green rhodopsin, an orange-absorbing metarhodopsin and red transparent screening pigments. Slow metarhodopsin degradation and rhodopsin regeneration processes further subserve visual pigment maintenance. In most insect eyes, where the majority of photoreceptors have green-absorbing rhodopsins and blue-absorbing metarhodopsins, natural illuminants are predicted to create metarhodopsin levels greater than 60% at high intensities. However, fast metarhodopsin decay and rhodopsin regeneration also play an important role in controlling metarhodopsin in green receptors, resulting in a high rhodopsin content at low light intensities and a reduced overall visual pigment content in bright light. A simple model for the visual pigment–arrestin cycle is used to illustrate the dependence of the visual pigment population states on light intensity, arrestin levels and pigment turnover.     

Trichromatic visual system in an insect and its sensitivity control by blue light

Summary The spectral sensitivity of the visual cells in the compound eye of the mothDeilephila elpenor was determined by electrophysiological mass recordings during exposure to monochromatic adapting light. Three types of receptors were identified. The receptors are maximally sensitive at about 350 nm (ultraviolet), 450 nm (violet), and 525 nm (green). The spectral sensitivity of the green receptors is identical to a nomogram for a rhodopsin with _max at 525 nm. The spectral sensitivity of the other two receptors rather well agrees with nomograms for corresponding rhodopsins. The recordings indicate that the green receptors occur in larger number than the other receptors. The ultra-violet and violet receptors probably occur in about equal number.The sensitivity after monochromatic adapting illumination varies with the wavelength of the adapting light, but is not proportional to the spectral sensitivity of the receptors. The sensitivity is proportional to the concentration of visual pigment at photoequilibrium. The equilibrium is determined by the absorbance coefficients of the visual pigment and its photoproduct at each wavelength. The concentration of the visual pigment, and thereby the sensitivity, is maximal at about 450 nm, and minimal at wavelengths exceeding about 570 nm.The light from a clear sky keeps the relative concentration of visual pigment in the green receptors, and the relative sensitivity, at about 0.62. The pigment concentration in the ultra-violet receptors is about 0.8 to 0.9, and that in the violet receptors probably about 0.6. At low ambient light intensities a chemical regeneration of the visual pigments may cause an increase in sensitivity. At higher intensities the concentrations of the visual pigments remain constant. Due to the constant pigment concentrations the input signals from the receptors to the central nervous system contain unequivocal information about variations in intensity and spectral distribution of the stimulating light.The work reported in this article was supported by the Swedish Medical Research Council (grant no B 73-04X-104-02B), by Karolinska Institutet, and by a grant (to G. Höglund) from Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Schwerpunktsprogramm Rezeptorphysiologie HA 258-10, and SFB 114.     

Visual pigments, oil droplets, ocular media and cone photoreceptor distribution in two species of passerine bird: the blue tit (Parus caeruleus L.) and the blackbird (Turdus merula L.)

The spectral absorption characteristics of the retinal photoreceptors of the blue tit (Parus caeruleus) and blackbird (Turdus merula) were investigated using microspectrophotometry. The retinae of both species contained rods, double cones and four spectrally distinct types of single cone. Whilst the visual pigments and cone oil droplets in the other receptor types are very similar in both species, the wavelength of maximum sensitivity (λ_max) of long-wavelength-sensitive single and double cone visual pigment occurs at a shorter wavelength (557 nm) in the blackbird than in the blue tit (563 nm). Oil droplets located in the long-wavelength-sensitivesingle cones of both species cut off wavelengths below 570–573 nm, theoretically shifting cone peak spectral sensitivity some 40 nm towards the long-wavelength end of the spectrum. This raises the possibility that the precise λ_max of the long-wavelength-sensitive visual pigment is optimised for the visual function of the double cones. The distribution of cone photoreceptors across the retina, determined using conventional light and fluorescence microscopy, also varies between the two species and may reflect differences in their visual ecology. Accepted: 8 January 2000     

Microspectrophotometric characterization and localization of three visual pigments in the compound eye ofNotonecta glauca L. (Heteroptera)

Summary The absorption maxima ( _max) of the visual pigments in the ommatidia ofNotonecta glauca were found by measuring the difference spectra of single rhabdomeres after alternating illumination with two different adaptation wavelengths. All the peripheral rhabdomeres contain a pigment with an extinction maximum at 560 nm. This pigment is sensitive to red light up to wavelengths > 700 nm. In a given ommatidium in the dorsal region of the eye, the two central rhabdomeres both contain one of two pigments, either a pigment with an absorption maximum in the UV, at 345 nm, or — in neighboring rhabdoms — a pigment with an absorption maximum at 445 nm. In the ventral part of the eye only the pigment absorbing maximally in the UV was found in the central rhabdomeres. The spectral absorption properties of various types of screening-pigment granules were measured.     

Adaptation of a deep-sea cephalopod to the photic environment. Evidence for three visual pigments

Watasenia scintillans, a bioluminescent deep-sea squid, has a specially developed eye with a large open pupil and three visual pigments. Photoreceptor cells (outer segment: 476 micron; inner segment: 99 micron) were long in the small area of the ventral retina receiving downwelling light, whereas they were short (outer segment: 207 micron; inner segment: 44 micron) in the other regions of the retina. The short photoreceptor cells contained the visual pigment with retinal (lambda max approximately 484 nm), probably for the purpose of adapting to their environmental light. The outer segment of the long photoreceptor cells consisted of two strata, a pinkish proximal area and a yellow distal area. The visual pigment with 3-dehydroretinal (lambda max approximately 500 nm) was located in the pinkish proximal area, giving high sensitivity at longer wavelengths. A newly found pigment (lambda max approximately 471 nm) was in the yellow distal area. The small area of the ventral retina containing two visual pigments is thought to have a high and broad spectral sensitivity, which is useful for distinguishing the bioluminescence of squids of the same species in their environmental downwelling light. These findings were obtained by partial bleaching of the extracted pigment from various areas of the retina and by high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of the chromophore, complemented by microscopic observations.     

Le contrôle automatique du flux lumineux dans l'oeil composé des Diptères

In the compound eye of the fly Musca, tiny pigment granules move within the cytoplasm of receptor cells Nos. 1–6 and cluster along the wall of the rhabdomeres under light adaptation, thus attenuating the light flux to which the visual pigment is exposed (Kirschfeld and Franceschini, 1969). Two recently developed optical methods (the neutralization of the cornea and the deep pseudopupil) combined with antidromic and orthodromic illumination of the eye (Fig. 1) make it possible to analyse the properties of the mechanism at the level of the single cell, in live and intact insects (Drosophila and Musca). The mechanism is shown to be an efficient attenuator in the spectral range (blue-green) where cells Nos. 1–6 have been reported to be maximally sensitive (Figs. 4c and d, 5b and 11b). In spite of the fact that the granules do not penetrate into the rhabdomere, the attenuation spectrum they bring about closely matches the absorption spectrum of the substance of which they are composed (ommochrome pigment, dotted curve in Fig. 11b). The dramatic increase in reflectance of the receptors after light adaptation (Figs. 3, 4b, 5a and 11a) can be explained as a mere by-product of the high absorption index of the ommochrome pigment, especially if one takes into account the phenomenon of anomalous dispersion (Chapter 8). The vivid green or yellow colour of the rhabdomeres would thus have a physical origin comparable to a metallic glint. Contrasting with the lens eye in which the pupillary mechanism is a common attenuator for both receptor types (rods and cones), the compound eye of higher Diptera is equiped with two types of pupils adapted respectively to both visual subsystems. A scotopic pupil is present in each of the six cells (Nos. 1–6) whose signals are gathered in a common cartridge of the first optic ganglion. This pupil comes into play at a moderate luminance (0,3 cd/m² in Drosophila; 3 to 10 cd/m² in Musca. Figs 13, 14, 15, 16). A photopic pupil is present in the central cell No. 7 whose signal reaches one column of the second optic ganglion. Attenuating the light flux for both central cells 7 and 8, the photopic pupil has its threshold about two decades higher than the scotopic pupil, just at the point where the latter reaches saturation (Fig. 3b, e-State II of Figs. 6b and 15). The photopic pupil itself saturates at a luminance one to two decades higher still (Fig. 3c, f=State III of Figs. 6c and 15). The two-decades-shift in threshold of these pupil-mechanisms supports the view that receptors 1–6 are a scotopic subsystem, receptors 7 and 8 a photopic subsystem of the dipteran eye. The luminance-threshold of the scotopic pupil (as determined with the apparatus described in Fig. 2) appears to be located at least 3.5 decades (Drosophila) or even 5 decades (Musca) higher than the absolute threshold of movement perception (Fig. 16). After a long period (1 hr) of darkness a light step of high intensity can close the scotopic pupil within about 10 sec (time constant 2 sec as in Fig. 9) and the photopic pupil within no less than 30–60 sec. Some mutants of Drosophila possess only a scotopic pupil (w , Figs. 4 and 5) whereas ommochrome deficient mutants lack both types of pupil (v, cn, see Fig. 7c, d). Comparable reflectance changes, accomplished within about 60 sec of light adaptation, are described for two insects having fused rhabdomes: the bee and the locust (Fig. 17).