Photooxidation of cytochrome b559 and the electron donors in chloroplast Photosystem II

The effect of light on the reaction center of Photosystem II was studied by differential absorption spectroscopy in spinach chloroplasts.

At − 196 °C, continuous illumination results in a parallel reduction of C-550 and oxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉ high potential. With flash excitation, C-550 is reduced, but only a small fraction of cytochrome b₅₅₉ is oxidized. The specific effect of flash illumination is suppressed if the chloroplasts are preilluminated by one flash at 0 °C.

At − 50 °C, continuous illumination results in the reduction of C-550 but little oxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉. However, complete oxidation is obtained if the chloroplasts have been preilluminated by one flash at 0 °C. The effect of preillumination is not observed in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea.

A model is discussed for the reaction center, with two electron donors, cytochrome b₅₅₉ and Z, acting in competition. Their respective efficiency is dependent on temperature and on their states of oxidation. The specific effect of flash excitation is attributed to a two-photon reaction, possibly based on energy-trapping properties of the oxidized trap chlorophyll.     

The role of chloride ion in Photosystem II I. Effects of chloride ion on Photosystem II electron transport and on hydroxylamine inhibition

1. Chloroplasts washed with Cl^?-free, low-salt media (pH 8) containing EDTA, show virtually no DCMU-insensitive silicomolybdate reduction. The activity is readily restored when 10 mM Cl^? is added to the reaction mixture. Very similar results were obtained with the other Photosystem II electron acceptor 2,5-dimethylquinone (with dibromothymoquinone), with the Photosystem I electron acceptor FMN, and also with ferricyanide which accepts electrons from both photosystems.2. Strong Cl^?-dependence of Hill activity was observed invariably at all pH values tested (5.5–8.3) and in chloroplasts from three different plants: spinach, tobacco and corn (mesophyll).3. In the absence of added Cl^? the functionally Cl^?-depleted chloroplasts are able to oxidize, through Photosystem II, artificial reductants such as catechol, diphenylcarbazide, ascorbate and H₂O₂ at rates which are 4–12 times faster than the rate of the residual Hill reaction.4. The Cl^?-concentration dependence of Hill activity with dimethylquinone as an electron acceptor is kinetically consistent with the typical enzyme activation mechanism: E(inactive) + Cl^?ag E · Cl^? (active), and the apparent activation constant (0.9 mM at pH 7.2) is unchanged by chloroplast fragmentation.5. The initial phase of the development of inhibition of water oxidation in Cl^?-depleted chloroplasts during the dark incubation with NH₂OH ($\text{1}\text{2}$ H₂SO₄) is 5 times slower when the incubation medium contains Cl^? than when the medium contains NH₂OH alone or NH₂OH plus acetate ion. (Acetate is shown to be ineffective in stimulating O₂ evolution.)6. We conclude that the Cl^?-requiring step is one which is specifically associated with the water-splitting reaction, and suggests that Cl^? probably acts as a cofactor (ligand) of the NH₂OH-sensitive, Mn-containing O₂-evolving enzyme.     

Kinetics of reduction of the oxidized primary electron donor of Photosystem II in spinach chloroplasts and in Chlorella cells in the microsecond and nanosecond time ranges following flash excitation

Absorption changes (ΔA) at 820 nm, following laser flash excitation of spinach chloroplasts and Chlorella cells, were studied in order to obtain information on the reduction time of the photooxidized primary donor of Photosystem II at physiological temperatures.In the microsecond time range the difference spectrum of ΔA between 750 and 900 nm represents a peak at 820 nm, attributable to a radical-cation of chlorophyll a. In untreated dark-adapted material the signal can be attributed solely to P⁺?700; it decays in a polyphasic manner with half-times of 17 μs, 210 μs and over 1 ms. The oxidized primary donor of Photosystem II (P⁺_II) is not detected with a time resolution of 3 μs. After treatment with 3–10 mM hydroxylamine, which inhibits the donor side of Photosystem II, P⁺_II is observed and decays biphasically (a major phase with $\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 20–40 μ}\text{s}$, and a minor phase with $\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{? 200 μ}\text{s}$), probably by reduction by an accessory electron donor.In the nanosecond range, which was made accessible by a new fast-response flash photometer operating at 820 nm, it was found the P⁺_II is reduced with a half-time of 25–45 ns in untreated dark-adapted chloroplasts. It is assumed that the normal secondary electron donor is responsible for this fast reduction.     

The rapid component of electron paramagnetic resonance signal II: A candidate for the physiological donor to Photosystem II in spinach chloroplasts

Rapid light-induced transients in EPR Signal IIf (F^?+) are observed in 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU)-treated, Tris-washed chloroplasts until the state F P680 Q^? is reached. In the absence of exogenous redox mediators several flashes are required to saturate this photoinactive state. However, the Signal IIf transient is observed on only the first flash following DCMU addition if an efficient donor to Signal IIf, phenylenediamine or hydroquinone, is present. Complementary polarographic measurements show that under these conditions oxidized phenylenediamine is produced only on the first flash of a series. The DCMU inhibition of Signal IIf can be completely relieved by oxidative titration of a one-electron reductant with E′_08.0 = +480 mV. At high reduction potentials the decay time of Signal IIf is constant at about 300 ms, whereas in the absence of DCMU the decay time is longer and increases with increasing reduction potential.A model is proposed in which Q^?, the reduced Photosystem II primary acceptor, and D, a one-electron 480 mV donor endogenous to the chloroplast suspension, compete in the reduction of Signal IIf (F^?+). At high potentials D is oxidized in the dark, and the (Q^? + F^?+) back reaction regenerates the photoactive F P680 Q state. The electrochemical and kinetic evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that the Signal IIf species, F, is identical with Z, the physiological donor to P680.     

Primary reactions of Photosystem II at low pH. 2. Light-induced changes of absorbance and electron spin resonance in spinach chloroplasts

The effects of lowering the pH on Photosystem II have been studied by measuring changes in absorbance and electron spin resonance in spinach chloroplasts.At pH values around 4 a light-induced dark-reversible chlorophyll oxidation by Photosystem II was observed. This chlorophyll is presumably the primary electron donor of system II. At pH values between 5 and 4 steady state illumination induced an ESR signal, similar in shape and amplitude to signal II, which was rapidly reversed in the dark. This may reflect the accumulation of the oxidized secondary donor upon inhibition of oxygen evolution. Near pH 4 the rapidly reversible signal and the stable and slowly decaying components of signal II disappeared irreversibly concomitant with the release of bound manganese.The results are discussed in relation to the effects of low pH on prompt and delayed fluorescence reported earlier (van Gorkom, H. J., Pulles, M. P. J., Haveman, J. and den Haan, G. A. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 423, 217–226).     

Photoreactions of cytochrome b-559 and cyclic electron flow in Photosystem II of intact chloroplasts

The high potential cytochrome b-559 of intact spinach chloroplasts was photooxidized by red light with a high quantum efficiency and by far-red light with a very low quantum efficiency, when electron flow from water to Photosystem II was inhibited by a carbonyl cyanide phenylhydrazone (FCCP or CCCP). Dithiothreitol, which reacts with FCCP or CCCP, reversed the photooxidation of cytochrome b-559 and restored the capability of the chloroplasts to photoreduce CO₂ showing that the FCCP/CCCP effects were reversible. The quantum efficiency of cytochrome b-559 photooxidation by red or far-red light in the presence of FCCP was increased by 2,5-dibromo-3-methyl-6-isopropyl-p-benzoquinone which blocks oxidation of reduced plastoquinone by Photosystem I. When the inhibition of water oxidation by FCCP or CCCP was decreased by increased light intensities, previously photooxidized cytochrome b-559 was reduced. Red light was much more effective in photoreducing oxidized high potential cytochrome b-559 than far-red light. The red/far-red antagonism in the redox state of cytochrome b-559 is a consequence of the different sensitivity of the cytochrome to red and far-red light and does not indicate that the cytochrome is in the main path of electrons from water to NADP. Rather, cytochrome b-559 acts as a carrier of electrons in a cyclic path around Photosystem II. The redox state of the cytochrome was shifted to the oxidized side when electron transport from water became rate-limiting, while oxidation of water and reduction of plastoquinone resulted in its shifting to the reduced side.     

A backflow of electrons around Photosystem II in Chlorella cells

A study was made with a modulated oxygen electrode of the effect of variations of oxygen concentration on photosynthetic oxygen evolution from algal cells. When Chlorella vulgaris is examined with a modulated 650 nm light at 22°C, both the oxygen yield and the phase lag between the modulated oxygen signal and the light modulations have virtually constant values between 800 and 120 ergs · cm^?1 · s^?1 if the bathing medium is in equilibrium with the air. Similar results are obtained at 32°C between 1600 and 120 ergs · cm^?2 · s^?1. Under anerobic conditions both the oxygen yield and the phase lag decrease if the light intensity is lowered below about 500 ergs · cm^?2 · s^?1 at 22°C or about 1000 ergs · cm^?2 · s^?1 at 32°C. A modulated 706 nm beam also gives rise to these phenomena but only at significantly lower rates of oxygen evolution. The cells of Anacystis nidulans and Porphyridium cruentum appear to react in the same way to anaerobic conditions as C. vulgaris. An examination of possible mechanisms to explain these results was performed using a computer simulation of photosynthetic electron transport. The simulation suggests that a backflow of electrons from a redox pool between the Photosystems to the rate-limiting reaction between Photosystem II and the water-splitting act can cause a decrease in oxygen yield and phase lag. If the pool between the Photosystems is in a very reduced state a significant cyclic flow is expected, whereas if the pool is largely oxidized little or no cyclic flow should occur. It is shown that the effects of 706 nm illumination and removal of oxygen can be interpreted in accordance with these proposals. Since a partial inhibition of oxygen evolution by 3-(3.4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (10^?8 M) magnifies the decreases in oxygen yield and phase lag, it is proposed that the pool which cycles back electrons is in front of the site of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea inhibition and is probably the initial electron acceptor pool after Photosystem II.     

Light-induced changes of absorbance and electron spin resonance in small Photosystem II particles

Photosystem II reaction center components have been studied in small system II particles prepared with digitonin. Upon illumination the reduction of the primary acceptor was indicated by absorbance changes due to the reduction of a plastoquinone to the semiquinone anion and by a small blue shift of absorption bands near 545 nm (C550) and 685 nm. The semiquinone to chlorophyll ratio was between 1/20 and 1/70 in various preparations. The terminal electron donor in this reaction did not cause large absorbance changes but its oxidized form was revealed by a hitherto unknown electron spin resonance (ESR) signal, which had some properties of the well-known signal II but a linewidth and g-value much nearer to those of signal I. Upon darkening absorbance and ESR changes decayed together in a cyclic or back reaction which was stimulated by 3-(3,4 dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. The donor could be oxidized by ferricyanide in the dark.

Illumination in the presence of ferricyanide induced absorbance and ESR changes, rapidly reversed upon darkening, which may be ascribed to the oxidation of a chlorophyll a dimer, possibly the primary electron donor of photosystem II. In addition an ESR signal with 15 to 20 gauss linewidth and a slower dark decay was observed, which may have been caused by a secondary donor.     

Primary and secondary electron donors in Photosystem II of chloroplasts. Rates of electron transfer and location in the membrane

Absorption changes at 820 or 515 nm after a short laser flash were studied comparatively in untreated chloroplasts and in chloroplasts in which oxygen evolution is inhibited.In chloroplasts pre-treated with Tris, the primary donor of Photosystem II (P-680) is oxidized by the flash, as observed by an absorption increase at 820 nm. After the first flash it is re-reduced in a biphasic manner with half-times of 6 μs (major phase) and 22 μs. After the second flash, the 6 μs phase is nearly absent and P-680⁺ decays with half-times of 130 μs (major phase) and 22 μs. Exogenous electron donors (MnCl₂ or reduced phenylenediamine) have no direct influence on the kinetics of P-680⁺.In untreated chloroplasts the 6 and 22 μs phases are of very small amplitude, either at the 1st, 2nd or 3rd flash given after dark-adaptation. They are observed, however, after incubation with 10 mM hydroxylamine.These results are interpreted in terms of multiple pathways for the reduction of P-680⁺: a rapid reduction (<1 μs) by the physiological donor D₁; a slower reduction (6 and 22 μs) by donor D′₁, operative when O₂ evolution is inhibited; a back-reaction (130 μs) when D′₁ is oxidized by the pre-illumination in inhibited chloroplasts. In Tris-treated chloroplasts the donor system to P-680⁺ has the capacity to deliver only one electron.The absorption change at 515 nm (electrochromic absorption shift) has been measured in parallel. It is shown that the change linked to Photosystem II activity has nearly the same magnitude in untreated chloroplasts or in chloroplasts treated with hydroxylamine or with Tris (first and subsequent flashes). Thus we conclude that all the donors (P-680, D₁, D′₁) are located at the internal side of the thylakoid membrane.     

Kinetics of the photoreduction of cytochrome b-559 by Photosystem II in chloroplasts

The kinetics of the photoreduction of cytochrome b-559 and plastoquinone were measured using well-coupled spinach chloroplasts. High potential (i.e. hydroquinone reducible) cytochrome b-559 was oxidized with low intensity far-red light in the presence of N-methyl phenazonium methosulfate or after preillumination with high intensity light. Using long flashes of red light, the half-reduction time of cytochrome b-559 was found to be 100±10 ms, compared to 6–10 ms for the photoreduction of the plastoquinone pool. Light saturation of the photoreduction of cytochrome b-559 occurred at a light intensity less than one-third of the intensity necessary for the saturation of ferricyanide reduction under identical illumination conditions. The photoreduction of cytochrome b-559 was accelerated in the presence of dibromothymoquinone with a $\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 25–35}\text{ms}$. The addition of uncouplers, which caused a stimulatory effect on ferricyanide reduction under the same experimental conditions, resulted in a decrease in the rate of cytochrome b-559 reduction. The relatively slow photoreduction rate of cytochrome b-559 compared to the plastoquinone pool implies that electrons can be transferred efficiently from Photosystem II to plastoquinone without the involvement of cytochrome b-559 as an intermediate. These results indicate that it is unlikely that high potential cytochrome b-559 functions as an obligatory redox component in the main electron transport chain joining the two photosystems.     

A flash photolysis ESR study of Photosystem II Signal IIvf, the physiological donor to P-680+

In flash-illuminated, oxygen-evolving spinach chloroplasts and green algae, a free radical transient has been observed with spectral parameters similar to those of Signal II ($\text{g ≈ 2.0045}$, $\text{ΔH}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>pp</mtext>}}\text{≈ 19}\text{G}$). However, in contrast with ESR Signal II, the transient radical does not readily saturate even at microwave power levels of 200 mW. This species is formed most efficiently with “red” illumination ($\text{λ < 680}\text{nm}$ and occurs stoichiometrically in a 1 : 1 ratio with $\text{P-700}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$. The Photosystem II transient is formed in less than 100 μs and decays via first-order kinetics with a halftime of 400–900 μs. Additionally, the $\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ for radical decay is temperature independent between 20 and 4 °C; however, below 4 °C the transient signal exhibits Arrhenius behavior with an activation energy of approx. 10 kcal · mol^?1. Inhibition of electron transport through Photosystem II by $\text{o-}\text{phenanthroline}$, 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea or reduced $\text{2,5-}\text{dibromo}\text{-3-}\text{methyl}\text{-6-}\text{isopropyl}\text{-p-}\text{benzoquinone}$ suppresses the formation of the light-induced transient. At low concentrations (0.2 mM), $\text{2,5-}\text{dibromo}\text{-3-}\text{methyl}\text{-6-}\text{isopropyl}\text{-p-}\text{benzoquinone}$ partially inhibits the free radical formation, however, the decay kinetics are unaltered. High concentrations of $\text{2,5-}\text{dibromo}\text{-3-}\text{methyl}\text{-6-}\text{isopropyl}\text{-p-}\text{benzoquinone}$ (1–5 mM) restore both the transient signal and electron flow through Photosystem II. These findings suggest that this “quinoidal” type ESR transient functions as the physiological donor to the oxidized reaction center chlorophyll, $\text{P-680}{}^{\mathrm{+}}$.     

Sulfhydryl reagents inhibit electron transport in Photosystem II of spinach chloroplasts

A 120 min incubation period with sulfhydryl reagents, such as p-chloromercuribenzoic acid, shows greater than 50% loss of electron-transport activity in Photosystem (PS) II of spinach chloroplasts. Since p-chloromercuriphenylsulfonic acid, a nonpenetrating sulfhydryl reagent, and 4,4′-dithiopyridine, a bifunctional sulfhydryl reagent, show greater inhibition of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea-insensitive silicomolybdate reduction than of dibromothymoquinone-insensitive indophenol reduction, it is postulated that two different sulfhydryl reagent-sensitive sites are involved in the PS II electron-transport chain of spinach chloroplasts.     

Inhibition of the reoxidation of the secondary electron acceptor of Photosystem II by bicarbonate depletion

In bicarbonate-depleted chloroplasts, the chlorophyll a fluorescence decayed with a halftime of about 150 ms after the third flash, and appreciably faster after the first and second flash of a series of flashes given after a dark period. After the fourth to twentieth flashes, the decay was also slow. After addition of bicarbonate, the decay was fast after all the flashes of the sequence. This indicates that the bicarbonate depletion inhibits the reoxidation of the secondary acceptor R²⁻ by the plastoquinone pool; R is the secondary electron acceptor of pigment system II, as it accepts electrons from the reduced form of the primary electron acceptor (Q⁻). This conclusion is consistent with the measurements of the DCMU (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea)-induced chlorophyll a fluorescence after a series of flashes in the presence and the absence of bicarbonate, if it is assumed that DCMU not only causes reduction of Q if added in the state QR⁻, but also if added in the state QR²⁻.     

Two electron donation sites for exogenous reductants in chloroplast Photosystem II

Two sites are distinguished for the oxidation of exogenous donors by Photosystem II in non-oxygen evolving chloroplasts. In the presence of lipophilic donors (e.g. phenylenediamine, benzidine, diphenylcarbazide), the rate for Signal IIf rereduction following a flash increases as the concentration of exogenous reductant increases. There is a decrease (20–40%) in Signal IIf magnitude accompanying donor addition at low (< 10^?5M) concentrations, but the extent of the decrease does not change further with increasing donor concentration. Complementary polarographic experiments monitoring donor (phenylenediamine) oxidation show an increase in oxidation rate with increasing donor concentration.In the presence of the hydrophilic donor, Mn²⁺, the Signal IIf decay halftime remains constant with increasing Mn²⁺ concentration. However, the flash-induced Signal IIf magnitude progressively decreases with increasing Mn²⁺ concentration.These results are interpreted in terms of two competing paths for the reduction of P680⁺. In one path P680⁺ reduction is accompanied by the appearance of Signal IIf, and lipophilic donors subsequently rereduce the Signal IIf species in a series reaction. This reduction follows pseudo-first order kinetics as a function of donor concentration. In the second path Mn²⁺ reduces P680⁺ in a parallel reaction that competes with the formation of the Signal IIf species. This results in a decrease in the magnitude of Signal IIf, but no change in its decay time.     

Effects of carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone and hydroxylamine on the Photosystem II electron exchange mechanism in 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea treated algae and chloroplasts

The effects of NH₂OH and carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) on 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU)-treated algae and chloroplasts were studied. In the presence of DCMU, the photochemically separated charges can only disappear through a recombination back reaction; both substances induce an irreversible reduction of the donor side and after sufficient illumination their action in the presence of DCMU leads to the formation of a permanent fluorescent state.

In the DCMU + CCCP system, a fast fluorescence induction curve is observed. The fluorescence yield is brought to its maximum by two flashes. The luminescence emission is strongly inhibited and most centers reach their permanent fluorescent state after one flash.

In the DCMU + NH₂OH system, a slow fluorescence rise is observed and several saturating flashes are needed for the fluorescence yield to reach its maximum. The exhaustion of the NH₂OH oxidizing capacity and the complete transformation to a permanent fluorescent state also require a large number of flashes.

The reduction pathway catalyzed by CCCP appears to be a good competitor to the back reaction, while NH₂OH seems to be a relatively inefficient donor.

In addition the action of NH₂OH and CCCP on fluorescence suggests that the donor side influences the quenching properties of Photosystem II centers. A possible mechanism is proposed.     

Cooperativity between Photosystem II centers at the level of primary electron transfer

1. Spinach chloroplasts, but not whole Chlorella cells, show an acceleration of the Photosystem II turnover time when excited by non-saturating flashes (exciting 25 % of centers) or when excited by saturating flashes for 85–95 % inhibition by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. Following dark adaptation, the turnover is accelerated after a non-saturating flash, preceded by none or several saturating flashes, and primarily after a first saturating flash for 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea inhibition. A rapid phase ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ approx. 0.75 s) is observed for the deactivation of State S₂ in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea.2. These accelerated relaxations suggest that centers of Photosystem II are interconnected at the level of the primary electron transfer and compete for primary oxidizing equivalents in a saturating flash. The model in best agreement with the experimental data consists of a paired interconnection of centers.3. Under the conditions mentioned above, an accelerated turnover may be observed following a flash for centers in S₀, S₁ or S₂ prior to the flash. This acceleration is interpreted in terms of a shift of the rate-limiting steps of Photosystem II turnover from the acceptor to the donor side.     

Interaction of exogenous benzoquinone with Photosystem II in chloroplasts. The semiquinone form acts as a dichlorophenyldimethylurea-insensitive secondary acceptor

Chloroplasts were submitted to a sequence of saturating short flashes and then rapidly mixed with dichlorophenyldimethylurea (DCMU). The amount of singly reduced secondary acceptor (B^?) present was estimated from the DCMU-induced increase in fluorescence in the dark caused by the reaction: QB^?

Q^?B. By varying the time interval between the preillumination and the mixing, the time course of B^? reoxidation by externally added benzoquinone was investigated. It was found that benzoquinone oxidizes B^? in a bimolecular reaction, and does not interact directly with Q^?. When a sufficient delay after the preillumination was allowed in order to let benzoquinone reoxidize B^? before the injection of DCMU, the fluorescence increase caused by one subsequent flash fired in the presence of DCMU was followed by a fast decay phase ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{? 100 μ}\text{s}$). The amplitude of this phase was proportional to the amount of B^? produced by the preillumination. This fast decay was observed only after the first flash in the presence of DCMU. These results are interpreted by assuming a binding of the singly reduced benzoquinone to Photosystem II where it acts as an efficient, DCMU-insensitive, secondary (exogenous) acceptor.     

Evidence for a double hit process in Photosystem II based on fluorescence studies

1. The amplitudes of the fast (0–20 μs) and slow (20 μs–2 ms) fluorescence rise induced by a 2 μs flash have been measured as a function of the energy of the flash in chloroplasts inhibited by 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. The saturation curve for the slow rise shows a characteristic lag which is not observed for the fast fluorescence rise. This lag indicates that Photosystem II centers undergo a double hit process which implies that (a), each photocenter includes two acceptors Q₁ and Q₂; (b), after the first hit, oxidized chlorophyll Chl⁺ is reduced by a secondary acceptor Y in a time short compared to the duration of the flash; (c), after the second hit, Chl⁺ is reduced by another secondary donor, D.

2. According to Den Haan et al. ((1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 368, 409–421), hydroxylamine destroys the secondary donor responsible for the fast reduction of Chl⁺. In the presence of 3 mM hydroxylamine, only the secondary donor D is functional and a flash induces mainly a single hit process.

3. The saturation curves for the fast and the slow rises have been studied in the presence of 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea for a second actinic flash given 2.5 s after a first saturating one. The large decrease in the half-saturating energy indicates the existence of efficient energy transfer occuring between photosynthetic units.

4. Two alternate hypotheses are discussed (a) in which D is an auxiliary donor and (b) in which D is included in the main electron transfer chain.