Sensory-based niche partitioning in a multiple predator–multiple prey community

Many predators and parasites eavesdrop on the communication signals of their prey. Eavesdropping is typically studied as dyadic predator–prey species interactions; yet in nature, most predators target multiple prey species and most prey must evade multiple predator species. The impact of predator communities on prey signal evolution is not well understood. Predators could converge in their preferences for conspicuous signal properties, generating competition among predators and natural selection on particular prey signal features. Alternatively, predator species could vary in their preferences for prey signal properties, resulting in sensory-based niche partitioning of prey resources. In the Neotropics, many substrate-gleaning bats use the mate-attraction songs of male katydids to locate them as prey. We studied mechanisms of niche partitioning in four substrate-gleaning bat species and found they are similar in morphology, echolocation signal design and prey-handling ability, but each species preferred different acoustic features of male song in 12 sympatric katydid species. This divergence in predator preference probably contributes to the coexistence of many substrate-gleaning bat species in the Neotropics, and the substantial diversity in the mate-attraction signals of katydids. Our results provide insight into how multiple eavesdropping predator species might influence prey signal evolution through sensory-based niche partitioning.     

Lampenbürstenchromosomen und multiple Nukleolen bei Orthopteren

Isolated unfixed chromosomes from the oocytes of several grasshopper species, of Gryllus domesticus, and of two cockroaches have been investigated under phase contrast. As demonstrated previously in Locusta migratoria (Kunz, 1967), these chromosomes resemble the lampbrush chromosomes in amphibian oocytes. From these the lateral loops of the orthopteran chromosomes differ in that they are only one third as long (Fig. 3). The distinctness of chromomeres and chiasmata is considerably lower than that in amphibian oocytes (Fig. 4). — Besides the lampbrush chromosomes the oocyte nuclei of Orthoptera contain several hundred spheres or granules which are thought to be the multiple nucleoli (Fig. 6). In young oocytes, these nucleoli are vacuolated spheroids aggregated compactly in the center of the nucleus (Fig. 7). In the oocyte of the cricket, this center contains Feulgen-positive material which disappears in the early growth period when the nucleoli transform from solid structures to several hundred spheres. In oocytes of an intermediate size, both in the grasshoppers and Gryllus such spheroids are present. In the larger mature oocytes these spheres are localized peripherally around the nuclear envelope (Decticus; Fig. 10b), or the become extended into beaded ring forms (Gryllus; Fig. 12), or these rings are opened, stretched and connected in a row to form long “pearl-string” threads (Locusta, Acrida, Homorocoryphus). The spheroids around the nuclear envelope of Decticus look very similar to the solid and spheroidal nucleoli in young oocytes of the axolotl (Callan, 1966). The beaded rings of Gryllus resemble the ring-shaped nucleoli in the amphibian oocytes during their intermediate growing phase. — Following Keyl's (1966) hypothesis for the construction of replication units, these different appearances of multiple nucleoli are proposed to be results of a similar mode of extra-replication, but of different arrangement. In the case of Gryllus and Decticus the nucleolar DNA Anlagen are set free from the chromosomes, but they remain attached one behind the other in Locusta and some other grasshoppers.     

Stationary multiple spots for reaction–diffusion systems

In this paper, we review analytical methods for a rigorous study of the existence and stability of stationary, multiple spots for reaction–diffusion systems. We will consider two classes of reaction–diffusion systems: activator–inhibitor systems (such as the Gierer–Meinhardt system) and activator–substrate systems (such as the Gray–Scott system or the Schnakenberg model). The main ideas are presented in the context of the Schnakenberg model, and these results are new to the literature. We will consider the systems in a two-dimensional, bounded and smooth domain for small diffusion constant of the activator. Existence of multi-spots is proved using tools from nonlinear functional analysis such as Liapunov–Schmidt reduction and fixed-point theorems. The amplitudes and positions of spots follow from this analysis. Stability is shown in two parts, for eigenvalues of order one and eigenvalues converging to zero, respectively. Eigenvalues of order one are studied by deriving their leading-order asymptotic behavior and reducing the eigenvalue problem to a nonlocal eigenvalue problem (NLEP). A study of the NLEP reveals a condition for the maximal number of stable spots. Eigenvalues converging to zero are investigated using a projection similar to Liapunov–Schmidt reduction and conditions on the positions for stable spots are derived. The Green’s function of the Laplacian plays a central role in the analysis. The results are interpreted in the biological, chemical and ecological contexts. They are confirmed by numerical simulations.      

Why does remyelination fail in multiple sclerosis?

Multiple sclerosis is a common cause of neurological disability in young adults. The disease is complex -- its aetiology is multifactorial and largely unknown; its pathology is heterogeneous; and, clinically, it is difficult to diagnose, manage and treat. However, perhaps its most frustrating aspect is the inadequacy of the healing response of remyelination. This regenerative process generally occurs with great efficiency in experimental models, and sometimes proceeds to completion in multiple sclerosis. But as the disease progresses, the numbers of lesions in which demyelination persists increases, significantly contributing to clinical deterioration. Understanding why remyelination fails is crucial for devising effective methods by which to enhance it.     

The heart-forming fields: one or multiple?

The recent identification of a second mesodermal region as a source of cardiomyocytes has challenged the views on the formation of the heart. This second source of cardiomyocytes is localized centrally on the embryonic disc relative to the remainder of the classic cardiac crescent, a region also called the pharyngeal mesoderm. In this review, we discuss the concept of the primary and secondary cardiogenic fields in the context of folding of the embryo, and the subsequent temporal events involved in formation of the heart. We suggest that, during evolution, the heart developed initially only with the components required for a systemic circulation, namely a sinus venosus, a common atrium, a 'left' ventricle and an arterial cone, the latter being the myocardial outflow tract as seen in the heart of primitive fishes. These components developed in their entirety from the classic cardiac crescent. Only later in the course of evolution did the appearance of novel signalling pathways permit the central part of the cardiac crescent, and possibly the contiguous pharyngeal mesoderm, to develop into the cardiac components required for the pulmonary circulation. These latter components comprise the right ventricle, and that part of the left atrium that derives from the mediastinal myocardium, namely the dorsal atrial wall and the atrial septum. It is these elements which are now recognized as developing from the second field of pharyngeal mesoderm. We suggest that, rather than representing development from separate fields, the cardiac components required for both the systemic and pulmonary circulations are derived by patterning from a single cardiac field, albeit with temporal delay in the process of formation.     

Does multiple infection select for raised virulence?

Classical models of virulence evolution conclude that the increased competition favoured by multiple infection will select for increasing consumption and deterioration of the host resource, or 'virulence'. However, recent empirical and theoretical studies suggest that this view of virulence has some shortcomings. Here, we argue that the evolutionary consequences of multiple infection depend critically on whether the exploitation rate of an individual parasite is governed directly by the behaviour of the individual, or whether it is limited by the collective behaviour of the coinfecting group. We illustrate that, depending on the mechanistic details of exploitation, multiple infection can select for reduced virulence.     

Monthly distribution of multiple sclerosis patients’ births

 As part of an integrated geographical and environmental epidemiological study of multiple sclerosis (MS) in Budapest’s Pesterzsébet district, many biometeorological variables were specifically examined. Also, the monthly distribution of birthdates of MS patients resident in the district was plotted. Patients reliably diagnosed with MS were found to have been born in greater numbers in the months of April and October, precisely 6 months apart. This finding indicates the presence of natural non-genetic factors in the creation of MS susceptibility, affecting the nervous system at the crucial time of myelination. Received: 25 March 1996 / Revised: 30 August 1996 / Accepted: 18 September 1996     

Intracellular Ca(2+) release mechanisms: multiple pathways having multiple functions within the same cell type?

The elevation of the cytosolic and nuclear Ca(2+) concentration is a fundamental signal transduction mechanism in almost all eukaryotic cells. Interestingly, three Ca(2+)-mobilising second messengers, D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP(3)), cyclic adenosine diphosphoribose (cADPR), and nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP(+)) were identified in a phylogenetically wide range of different organisms. Moreover, in an as yet very limited number of cell types, sea urchin eggs, mouse pancreatic acinar cells, and human Jurkat T-lymphocytes, all three Ca(2+)-mobilising ligands have been shown to be involved in the generation of Ca(2+) signals. This situation raises the question why during evolution all three messengers have been conserved in the same cell type. From a theoretical point of view the following points may be considered: (i) redundant mechanisms ensuring intact Ca(2+) signalling even if one system does not work, (ii) the need for subcellularly localised Ca(2+) elevations to obtain a certain physiological response of the cell, and (iii) tight control of a physiological response of the cell by a temporal sequence of Ca(2+) signalling events. These theoretical considerations are compared to the current knowledge regarding the three messengers in sea urchin eggs, mouse pancreatic acinar cells, and human Jurkat T lymphocytes.     

Permutation – based statistical tests for multiple hypotheses

Background  

Genomics and proteomics analyses regularly involve the simultaneous test of hundreds of hypotheses, either on numerical or categorical data. To correct for the occurrence of false positives, validation tests based on multiple testing correction, such as Bonferroni and Benjamini and Hochberg, and re-sampling, such as permutation tests, are frequently used. Despite the known power of permutation-based tests, most available tools offer such tests for either t-test or ANOVA only. Less attention has been given to tests for categorical data, such as the Chi-square. This project takes a first step by developing an open-source software tool, Ptest, that addresses the need to offer public software tools incorporating these and other statistical tests with options for correcting for multiple hypotheses.     

Does multiple paternity influence offspring disease resistance?

It has been suggested that polyandry allows females to increase offspring genetic diversity and reduce the prevalence and susceptibility of their offspring to infectious diseases. We tested this hypothesis in wild‐derived house mice (Mus musculus) by experimentally infecting the offspring from 15 single‐ and 15 multiple‐sired litters with two different strains of a mouse pathogen (Salmonella Typhimurium) and compared their ability to control infection. We found a high variation in individual infection resistance (measured with pathogen loads) and significant differences among families, suggesting genetic effects on Salmonella resistance, but we found no difference in prevalence or infection resistance between single‐ vs. multiple‐sired litters. We found a significant sex difference in infection resistance, but surprisingly, males were more resistant to infection than females. Also, infection resistance was correlated with weight loss during infection, although only for females, indicating that susceptibility to infection had more harmful health consequences for females than for males. To our knowledge, our findings provide the first evidence for sex‐dependent resistance to Salmonella infection in house mice. Our results do not support the hypothesis that multiple‐sired litters are more likely to survive infection than single‐sired litters; however, as we explain, additional studies are required before ruling out this hypothesis.     

Are there multiple circadian clocks in plants?

We have reported that Arabidopsis might have genetically distinct circadian oscillators in multiple cell-types.¹ Rhythms of CHLOROPHYLL A/B BINDING PROTEIN2 (CAB2) promoter activity are 2.5 h longer in phytochromeB mutants in constant red light and in cryptocrome1 cry2 double mutant (hy4-1 fha-1) in constant blue light than the wild-type.² However, we found that cytosolic free Ca²⁺ ([Ca²⁺]_cyt) oscillations were undetectable in these mutants in the same light conditions.¹ Furthermore, mutants of CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 (CCA1) have short period rhythms of leaf movement but have arrhythmic [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillations. More important, the timing of cab1-1 (toc1-1) mutant has short period rhythms of CAB2 promoter activity (∼21 h) but, surprisingly, has a wild-type period for circadian [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillations (∼24 h). In contrast, toc1-2, a TOC1 loss-of-function mutant, has a short period of both CAB2 and [Ca²⁺]_cyt rhythms (∼21 h). Here we discuss the difference between the phenotypes of toc1-1 and toc1-2 and how rhythms of CAB2 promoter activity and circadian [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillations might be regulated differently.Key words: circadian rhythms, TOC1, multiple oscillators, CAB2, Ca²⁺ signalling, arabidopsis, circadian [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillations, aequorin, luciferase, central oscillatorThe plant circadian clock controls a multitude of physiological processes such as photosynthesis, organ and stomatal movements and transition to reproductive growth. A plant clock that is correctly matched to the rhythms in the environment brings about a photosynthetic advantage that results in more chlorophyll, more carbon assimilation and faster growth.³ One of the first circadian clock mutants to be described in plants was the short period timing of cab1-1 (toc1-1), which was identified using the rhythms of luciferase under a CHLOROPHYLL A/B BINDING PROTEIN2 (CAB2) promoter as a marker for circadian period.⁴Circadian rhythms of both CAB2 promoter activity and cytosolic-free Ca²⁺ ([Ca²⁺]_cyt) oscillations depend on the function of a TOC1, CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (TOC1/CCA1/LHY) negative feedback loop.⁵ In tobacco seedlings, CAB2:luciferase (CAB2:luc) rhythms and circadian [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillations can be uncoupled in undifferentiated calli.⁶ In Arabidopsis, we reported that toc1-1 has different periods of rhythms of CAB2 promoter activity (∼21 h) and circadian [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillations (∼24 h). The mutant allele toc1-1 has a base pair change that leads to a full protein that has an amino acid change from Ala to Val in the CCT domain (CONSTANS, CONSTANS-LIKE and TOC1).⁷ On the other hand, the mutant toc1-2 has short period of both rhythms of CAB2 promoter activity and circadian [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillations (∼21 h).^1,7 This allele has a base pair change that results in changes to preferential mRNA splicing, resulting in a truncated protein with only 59 residues.⁷ Thus, the mutated CCT domain in toc1-1 might lead to the uncoupling of rhythms of CAB2 promoter activity and circadian [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillations while the absence of TOC1 in toc1-2 causes the shortening of the period of both rhythms. Indeed, zeitlupe-1 (ztl-1) mutants, that have higher levels of TOC1, have long periods of both rhythms of CAB2 promoter activity and circadian [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillations.¹ The biochemical function of the CCT domain is unknown but it is predicted to play an important role in protein-protein interactions⁸ and nuclear localization.⁹One model to explain the period difference of CAB2:luc expression and circadian [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillation is that the toc1-1 mutation has uncoupled two oscillators in the same cell. Uncoupled oscillators are a predicted outcome of certain mutations in the recently described three-loop mathematical model.^10–11 However, both rhythms of TOC1 and CCA1/LHY expression, which would be in uncoupled oscillators accordingly to the model, are described as short-period in toc1-1.⁵ Thus, we have favored the model in which CAB2:luc expression and circadian [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillation are reporting cell-types with different oscillators that are affected differently by toc1-1.It is possible that TOC1 could interact with a family of cell-type specific proteins. The interaction of TOC1 with each member of the family could be affected differently by the mutation in the CCT domain (Fig. 1). Two-hybrid assays have shown that TOC1 interacts with PIF proteins (PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR3 and PIF4) and related PIL proteins (PIF3-LIKE PROTEIN 1, PIL2, PIL5 and PIL6).⁸ In fact, TOC1 interaction with both PIF3 and PIL1 is stronger when the N-terminus receiver domain is taken out and the CCT domain is left intact.⁸ Thus, it is possible that TOC1 and different PIF/PIL proteins interact to regulate the central oscillator. This interaction could be impaired by the Ala to Val change in the toc1-1 mutation, leading to the period shortening. However, lines misexpressing PIF3, PIL1 and PIL6 showed no changes in their circadian rhythms.^12–16Open in a separate windowFigure 1Models of how the toc1-1 mutation might differently affect cell-type specific circadian oscillators. The single mutant toc1-1 have 21 h rhythms of CAB2 promoter activity and 24 h-rhythms of [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillations. The toc1-1 mutation is a single amino acid change in the CCT domain. The CCT domain is involved in protein-protein interaction and/or nuclear localization. We have proposed that circadian oscillators with different periods are present in different cell-types. The luminescence generated by CAB2 promoter-drived luciferase (from the CAB2:luc) is probably originated in the epidermis and mesophyll cells. In this model, we propose that the mutation on the CCT domain impairs the mutated TOC1 interaction with the hypothetical protein Z in these cells-types. In contrast, in other cell-types, the mutated TOC1 still interacts with other hypothetical proteins (W), despite the mutation in the CCT domain. In those cell-types, the circadian oscillator could still run with a 24 h period for [Ca²⁺]_cyt rhythms (from the 35S:AEQ construct). One possible identity for Z and W are the members of the PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR (PIF) related PIF3-LIKE (PIL) family.One possible explanation for the absence of alterations in the period of circadian rhythms in lines misexpressing PIF/PIL is that they only have roles in certain cell-types. As an example, PIL6 and PIF3 are involved with flowering time and hypocotyl growth in red light^12–15 while PIL1 and PIL2 are involved with hypocotyl elongation in shade-avoidance responses.¹⁶ Both hypocotyl growth and flowering time require cell-type specific regulation: vascular bundle cells in the case of the flowering time¹⁷ and the cells in the shoot in the case of the hypocotyl elongation.¹⁶ If TOC1 interaction with certain PIF/PIL is indeed cell-type specific, the mutated CCT domain found in the toc1-1 mutant could affect the clock in different ways, depending on the type of PIF/PIL protein expressed in each cell-type. Therefore, a question that arises is: which cell-types are sensitive to the toc1-1 mutation?There is evidence that CAB2 and CATALASE3 (CAT3) are regulated by two oscillators that respond differently to temperature signals.¹⁸ These genes might be regulated by two distinct circadian oscillators within the same tissues or a single cell.¹⁸ Interestingly, the spatial patterns of expression of CAB2 and CATALASE3 overlap in the mesophyll of the cotyledons.¹⁸ Furthermore, rhythms of CAB2 and CHALCONE SYNTHASE (CHS) promoter activity have different periods and they are equally affected by toc1-1 mutation.¹⁹ Whereas CAB2 is mainly expressed in the mesophyll cells, CHS is mainly expressed in epidermis and root cells.¹⁹ However, rhythms of AEQUORIN luminescence, which reports [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillation, were insensitive to toc1-1 mutation and appear to come from the whole cotyledon.²⁰ One cell-type which is found in the whole cotyledon but is distinct from either mesophyll or epidermis cells is the vascular tissue and associated cells.Another approach to determine which cell-types are insensitive to toc1-1 mutation is to compare the toc1-1 and toc1-2 phenotypes. The period of circadian [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillations is not the only phenotype that is different in toc1-1 and toc1-2 mutants. Rhythms in CAB2 promoter activity in constant red light are short period in toc1-1 but arrhythmic in toc1-2.^21,22 COLD, CIRCADIAN RHYTHM AND RNA BINDING 2/GLYCINE-RICH RNA BINDING PROTEIN 7 (CCR2/GRP7) is also arrhythmic in toc1-2 but short period in toc1-1 in constant darkness.^7,22 When the length of the hypocotyl was measured for both toc1-1 and toc1-2 plants exposed to various intensities of red light, only toc1-2 had a clear reduction in sensitivity to red light. Therefore, toc1-2 has long hypocotyl when maintained in constant red light while hypocotyl length in toc1-1 is nearly identical to that in the wild-type.²² These differences may allow us to separate which cell-types are sensitive to the toc1-1 mutation and which not.Hypocotyl growth is regulated by a large number of factors such as light, gravity, auxin, cytokinins, ethylene, gibberellins and brassinosteroids.²³ There is also a correlation between the size of the hypocotyl in red light and defects in the circadian signaling network.^24,25 The fact that toc1-1 has different hypocotyl sizes from toc1-2 suggests that circadian [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillations could be involved in the light-dependent control of hypocotyl growth. Circadian [Ca²⁺]_cyt oscillations might encode temporal information to control cell expansion and hypocotyl growth.^26–28 toc1-1 have short-period rhythms of hypocotyl elongation, which indicates that the cells in the hypocotyl have a 21 h oscillator.²⁹ However, toc1-1 might also have a wild-type hypocotyl length in continuous red light because cells which generate the signal to regulate hypocotyl growth might have 24 h oscillators.The toc1-1 mutation was the first to be directly associated with the plant circadian clock, revitalizing the field of study.⁴ Now, by either uncoupling two feedback loops or by distinct TOC1 protein-protein interaction in different cell-types, toc1-1 has shown new properties of the circadian clock that may deepen our understanding of this system.     

Identify multiple myeloma stem cells: Utopia?

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy of monoclonal plasma cells which remains incurable despite recent advances in therapies. The presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) has been demonstrated in many solid and hematologic tumors, so the idea of CSCs has been proposed for MM, even if MM CSCs have not been define yet. The existence of myeloma CSCs with clonotypic B and clonotypic non B cells was postulated by many groups. This review aims to focus on these distinct clonotypic subpopulations and on their ability to develop and sustain MM. The bone marrow microenvironment provides to MM CSCs self-renewal, survival and drug resistance thanks to the presence of normal and cancer stem cell niches. The niches and CSCs interact each other through adhesion molecules and the interplay between ligands and receptors activates stemness signaling (Hedgehog, Wnt and Notch pathways). MM CSCs are also supposed to be responsible for drug resistance that happens in three steps from the initial cancer cell homing microenvironment-mediated to development of microenvironment-independent drug resistance. In this review, we will underline all these aspects of MM CSCs.     

Triclosan-bacteria interactions: single or multiple target sites?

AIMS: To investigate the inhibitory and lethal effects of triclosan against several micro-organisms at different stages of their phase of population growth. METHODS AND RESULTS: Triclosan minimum inhibitory concentrations against several test organisms were determined in broth and agar using standard protocols. The bisphenol effect on bacterial population growth kinetics was studied using the Bioscreen C microbial growth analyser. Finally, the efficacy of triclosan on phases of bacterial growth was determined using a standard suspension test. The duration of the lag phase for all micro-organisms tested was increased by bisphenol in a concentration-dependent manner. The population growth kinetics of the micro-organisms was also altered after biocide exposure. At higher concentrations, triclosan was bactericidal regardless of their phase of population growth, although population in stationary phase and particularly, washed suspensions, were more resilient to the lethality of triclosan. This lethal activity was concentration and contact time dependent, and in some instances, bactericidal activity of bisphenol was observed within 15 s. CONCLUSIONS: Low concentrations of triclosan affected the growth of several bacteria, while higher concentrations were bactericidal regardless of the bacterial phase of population growth. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Here, we presented clear evidence that the interaction of triclosan with the bacterial cell is complex and its lethality cannot be explained solely by the inhibition of metabolic pathways such as the enoyl acyl-reductase. However, the inhibition of such pathways cannot be ruled out as part of the lethal mechanism of the bisphenol at a low bactericidal concentration.     

Plant defense: one post,multiple guards?!

Arabidopsis RIN4 is a key bacterial virulence target that is guarded by the resistance (R) protein RPM1. Two recent studies suggest that another R protein, RPS2, also guards RIN4. Bacterial avirulence (Avr) effectors AvrB, AvrRpm1, and AvrRpt2 alter this key protein. R proteins RPM1 and RPS2 recognize the altered status and initiate a defense-signaling response. The guard hypothesis is in!