Specific progesterone receptors in human breast cancer.

We have identified a specific progesterone receptor in 11 of 33 human breast cancer cytosols. Since progesterone itself binds to glucocorticoid receptor, to corticosteroid binding globulin (CBG), and to nonspecific components as well as to its own receptor, we have used a synthetic progestin, R5020 (17,21-dimethyl-19-nor-4,9-pregnadiene-3,20-dione), whose binding specificity is restricted to progesterone receptor. Bound R5020 sediments at 8 S in sucrose gradients; binding is competed by excess unlabeled R5020 or progesterone. The receptor is distinct from glucocorticoid receptor and CBG as determined by competition studies using dexamethasone and hydrocortisone. The dissociation constant for R5020 obtained by Scatchard analysis of dextran-coated charcoal assays is approximately 2 times 10- minus 9 M.     

Expression, regulation, and function of progesterone receptors in bovine cumulus oocyte complexes during in vitro maturation

Progesterone (P4) exerts its effects by binding to specific genomic (nPR-A/B) and non-genomic (mPRalpha/beta, PGRMC1/2) receptors. P4 has a role in the regulation of the ovulatory cycle, but its participation in oocyte maturation in mammals has not yet been clarified. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to characterize the protein expression of P4 receptors (PRs) in bovine oocytes and cumulus cells during in vitro maturation (IVM) and to study the effect of P4 and its receptors on oocyte developmental competence. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were subjected to IVM, in vitro fertilization, and in vitro culture. IVM was performed for 24 h in the presence or absence of P4, luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), trilostane, promegestone (R5020), mifepristone (RU 486), or antibodies against mPRalpha or mPRbeta. Protein expression of PRs was studied by Western blotting and immunofluorescence. The results demonstrate the presence of both genomic and nongenomic PRs in bovine COCs. The dynamic changes observed in the protein expression of PRs following IVM or in response to supplementation with LH, FSH, or P4 suggest an important role during bovine oocyte maturation. Inhibition of P4 synthesis by cumulus cells or blocking of nPR and mPR alpha activity produced a decrease in bovine embryo development, indicating that P4 intracellular signaling is mediated by its interaction with nuclear and membrane PRs and is important for oocyte developmental competence.     

Hormonal regulation of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in cultured bovine endometrial cells.

Changes in the number of progesterone and oestradiol receptors in the endometrium are thought to play a role in the induction of luteolysis. The effect of oestradiol and progesterone on the regulation of their receptors in cultured bovine uterine epithelial and stromal cells was examined to determine the mechanisms involved in this process. Cells were obtained from cows at days 1-3 of the oestrous cycle and were cultured for 4 or 8 days in medium alone (RPMI medium + 5% (v/v) charcoal-dextran stripped newborn calf serum) or with oestradiol, progesterone or oestradiol and progesterone. At the end of culture, receptor binding was measured by saturation analysis. Specific binding of both [3H]ORG 2058 (16 alpha-ethyl-21-hydroxy-19-nor (6,7-3H) pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione) and [3H]oestradiol to epithelial and stromal cells showed high affinities (Kd = 1.1 x 10(-9) and 6 x 10(-10) mol l-1, respectively, for progesterone receptors; Kd = 5.5 x 10(-9) and 7 x 10(-10) mol l-1, respectively, for oestradiol receptors). In the stromal cells, oestradiol (0.1-10 nmol l-1) increased the number of oestradiol receptors from 0.21 +/- 0.06 to 0.70 +/- 0.058 fmol microgram-1 DNA and the number of progesterone receptors from 1.4 +/- 0.83 to 6.6 +/- 0.70 fmol microgram-1 DNA in a dose-dependent manner after 4 days of culture (P < 0.01). After culture for 8 days, the stimulatory effect of oestradiol increased. Progesterone (50 nmol l-1) had no effect on the number of oestradiol or progesterone receptors (P > 0.05). However, progesterone inhibited the stimulatory effect of oestradiol. In epithelial cells, the lower concentrations of oestradiol (0.1 and 1 nmol l-1) stimulated the number of progesterone receptors (P = 0.05) after 4 days culture, whereas the highest concentration of oestradiol (10 nmol l-1), progesterone (50 nmol l-1) and progesterone (50 nmol l-1) plus oestradiol (1 nmol l-1) had no effect. After culture for 8 days, the stimulatory effect of oestradiol decreased. In contrast to progesterone receptors, the number of oestradiol receptors increased with oestradiol concentration (P < 0.01). These data show that the number of progesterone receptors was higher in the stromal cells than in epithelial cells, whereas the number of oestradiol receptors was higher in the epithelial cells than in stromal cells. Oestradiol upregulates its own receptor and increases the number of progesterone receptors in both cell types in vitro, whereas progesterone has little effect, but inhibits the effects of oestradiol on progesterone receptors.     

Cellular expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in mammary glands: regulation by hormones, development and aging

At present, there is an extensive body of literature documenting the participation of estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) in mammary gene expression. Yet, the precise roles of these receptors in regulating mammary development, carcinogenesis and the growth of a subset of tumors still remain unclear. Mammary glands are composed of various cell types with different developmental potentials. Further, ultimately, that it is their mutual interactions which dictate the behavior of mammary epithelial cells. Therefore, to resolve the roles of ER and PR in normal mammary growth, differentiation and carcinogenesis, analyses for the expression of these receptors at the level of individual cell types is of paramount importance. Accordingly, in the present studies using immunolocalization techniques, we document the ontogeny and cellular distribution of ER and PR during mammary development and in response to ovarian hormones and aging. In addition, we discuss the potential biological significances of the expression patterns of ER and PR during various physiological states. We believe that the observations reported here should provide a conceptual framework(s) for elucidating the roles of ER and PR in normal and neoplastic mammary tissues.     

Tamoxifen decreases progesterone and nuclear androgen receptors in the human prostate

Androgen (AR) and progesterone (PR) receptors were measured in resected prostate tissues of patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy. One group of patients received an anti-estrogen, tamoxifen (Tm 20 mg b.i.d.) for 10 days prior to prostate resection; a second group served as controls and were untreated. Plasma levels of Tm were 200-500 pmol/ml at the time of surgery. Statistically significant decreases (P less than 0.05) were found in cytosol PR (154 fmol/mg DNA +/- 33 SE in 14 Tm-patients vs 266 +/- 40 SE in 13 untreated patients) and in nuclear AR (103 fmol/mg DNA +/- 70 SE in 18 Tm-patients vs 257 +/- 62 SE in 17 controls). Cytosol AR was not significantly different in Tm-treated patients (257 fmol/mg DNA +/- 79 SE in 15 Tm-patients vs 346 +/- 130 SE in 17 controls, P greater than 0.6). Although receptor recycling is one of several possible explanations, these decreases in progesterone and nuclear androgen receptors in Tm-treated patients suggest that estrogen has a role in the biological regulation of steroid receptors in the human prostate.     

Role of progesterone and oestradiol in the regulation of uterine oxytocin receptors in ewes.

The interaction between oestrogen and progesterone in the regulation of the uterine oxytocin receptor in sheep was evaluated by measuring the binding of oxytocin to membrane preparations of caruncular and intercaruncular endometrium and myometrium. Ovariectomized ewes were assigned in groups of five to each cell of a 4 x 2 factorial design. The four treatments were (a) vehicle (maize oil) for 12 days, (b) progesterone (10 mg day-1) for 9 days, (c) progesterone for 9 days followed by maize oil until day 12 and (d) progesterone for 12 days. The two oestradiol treatments consisted of the administration of implants in the presence or absence of oestradiol. The ewes were killed on day 10 (group b) or day 13 (groups a, c and d) for collection of uterine tissues. The response of the caruncular and intercaruncular endometrium to the treatments was similar. In the absence of oestradiol, treatment with progesterone continuously for either 9 or 12 days reduced the concentration of the oxytocin receptor in comparison with both the control and the progesterone withdrawal group (in which values were similar). The presence of oestradiol reduced the receptor concentrations in control and both 9- and 12-day continuous progesterone treatment groups, but enhanced the concentration in the progesterone withdrawal group. The myometrial oxytocin receptors responded in a similar way to those in the endometrium to progesterone treatment alone, but the addition of oestradiol produced no further effect. In conclusion, progesterone and oestradiol caused downregulation of the endometrial oxytocin receptor. On the other hand, progesterone withdrawal, similar to that which occurs during luteolysis, increased receptor density in the presence of oestradiol. Progesterone may influence the response of the myometrium to oxytocin by causing a reduction in receptor density.     

Characterization and localization of estrogen and progesterone receptors of human fallopian tube

The cellular distribution of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PR) in the human fallopian tube was investigated by immunohistochemical localization with specific monoclonal antibodies. Nuclear immunostaining was observed. Intense PR immunostaining was seen in tissues obtained at mid cycle and luteal stages of the normal menstrual cycle. On the other hand, enhanced staining for ER was seen in early follicular phase and mid cycle. Menopausal tissues showed negligible staining for both ER and PR. The ER and PR were characterized for their molecular size, anatomical distribution and levels during the menstrual cycle and in menopause. ER protein was present throughout the cycle and also during menopause. Western blot analysis revealed two forms of ER approximately 66 kDa and a truncated from approximately 49 kDa in hFT. Presence of A [approximately 90 kDa] and B [approximately 120 kDa] isoforms of human PR was detected. Follicular and early luteal tissue possessed relatively high concentration of immunoreactive PR whereas it was almost undetectable in menopausal tissues. These results suggests that ER and PR are regulated by the changing ovarian steroid hormones.     

Estrogen and progesterone receptors in gynecomastia

The etiology of gynecomastia is unknown. There seems to be no increased incidence of malignancies in patients with idiopathic gynecomastia; however, patients with Klinefelter syndrome exhibit an increased incidence of malignancy. The authors reviewed the results of 34 patients with gynecomastia diagnosed in adolescence who, following initial evaluation, had a mastectomy. The estrogen and progesterone receptors were analyzed in these patients. Three of the patients were diagnosed with Klinefelter syndrome. These three patients exhibited elevated amounts of estrogen and progesterone receptors. None of the patients who were not diagnosed with this syndrome demonstrated significant elevation of their estrogen or progesterone receptors. The presence of elevated estrogen and progesterone receptors in patients with Klinefelter syndrome provides a potential mechanism by which these patients may develop breast neoplasms. The absence of elevated estrogen and progesterone receptors in patients with idiopathic gynecomastia may serve to clarify why these patients' disease rarely degenerates into malignancy.     

Expression of adiponectin receptors in human macrophages and regulation by agonists of the nuclear receptors PPARalpha, PPARgamma, and LXR

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear receptors expressed in macrophages where they control cholesterol homeostasis and inflammation. In an attempt to identify new PPARalpha and PPARgamma target genes in macrophages, a DNA array-based global gene expression profiling experiment was performed on human primary macrophages treated with specific PPARalpha and PPARgamma agonists. Surprisingly, AdipoR2, one of the two recently identified receptors for adiponectin, an adipocyte-specific secreted hormone with anti-diabetic and anti-atherogenic activities, was found to be induced by both PPARalpha and PPARgamma. AdipoR2 induction by PPARalpha and PPARgamma in primary and THP-1 macrophages was confirmed by Q-PCR analysis. Interestingly, treatment with a synthetic LXR agonist induced the expression of both AdipoR1 and AdipoR2. Furthermore, co-incubation with a PPARalpha ligand and adiponectin resulted in an additive effect on the reduction of macrophage cholesteryl ester content. Finally, AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 are both present in human atherosclerotic lesions. Moreover, AdipoR1 is more abundant than AdipoR2 in monocytes and its expression decreases upon differentiation into macrophages, whereas AdipoR2 remains constant. In conclusion, AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 are expressed in human atherosclerotic lesions and macrophages and can be modulated by PPAR and LXR ligands, thus identifying a mechanism of crosstalk between adiponectin and these nuclear receptor signaling pathways.     

Immunologic analysis of human breast cancer progesterone receptors. 2. Structure, phosphorylation, and processing

We have used a monoclonal antibody (MAb) directed against chick oviduct progesterone receptors (PR), that cross-reacts with human PR, to analyze PR structure and phosphorylation. This MAb, designated PR-6, interacts only with B receptors (Mr 120,000) of T47D human breast cancer cells; it has no affinity for A receptors (Mr 94,000) or for proteolytic fragments from either protein. The antibody immunoprecipitates native B receptors and was used to study the structure of native untransformed 8S and transformed 4S receptors, using sucrose density gradient analysis, photoaffinity labeling, and gel electrophoresis. On molybdate-containing low-salt gradients, PR-6 complexes with 8S B receptors, causing their shift to the bottom of the gradient while A receptors remain at 8 S. Therefore, A and B receptors form separate 8S complexes, and we conclude that A and B do not dimerize in the holoreceptor. Similar gradient studies using salt-containing, molybdate-free buffers show that there are two forms of salt-transformed 4S receptors, comprising either A proteins or B proteins, suggesting that A and B are also not linked to one another in transformed PR. The independence of A- and B-receptor complexes was confirmed by the finding that purified, transformed B receptors bind well to DNA-cellulose. Since PR-6 cross-reacts with nuclear PR, it was used to analyze nuclear PR processing--a down-regulation step associated with receptor loss as measured by hormone binding. Insoluble nuclear receptors and soluble cytosol receptors were measured by immunoblotting following treatment of T47D cells for 5 min to 48 h with either R5020 or progesterone. From 8 to 48 h after R5020 treatment, immunoassayable receptors decreased in nuclei and were not recovered in cytosols. Nuclear receptors also decreased after progesterone treatment but replenished in cytosols between 8 and 24 h after the start of treatment. Thus, processing involves a true loss of nuclear receptor protein, and not just loss of hormone binding activity, and occurs after progesterone or R5020 treatment. This loss is chronic, however, only in R5020-treated cells. Additional studies focused on the covalent modifications of receptors. We previously described shifts in apparent molecular weight of nuclear PR following R5020 treatment using in situ photoaffinity labeling. To show whether these shifts can be explained by receptor phosphorylation, untreated cells and hormone-treated cells were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate, and the B receptors were isolated by immunoprecipitation with PR-6 and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) gel electrophoresis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Estrogen and progesterone receptors in some human myeloma cell lines and murine hybridomas

The control of immune responses by sex hormones is well documented but the effect of sex hormones on lymphoid cell subsets is poorly understood. We have investigated the expression of receptors for androgens (AR), estradiol (ER) and progesterone (PR) by human cell lines of the B lymphocyte lineage and by murine myeloma or hybridomas. AR, ER and PR were determined by cytosol and nuclear binding assays. Eleven human lymphoblastoid cell lines obtained by in vitro infection of blood or tonsil B cells with Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) B95, did not express AR or ER. Similarly, 10 Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines were AR, ER and PR negative with the exception of the pre-B RAJI cells which bear AR. Among 13 cell lines derived from patients with multiple myeloma none expressed AR but five were found to bear ER (20-164 fmol/mg DNA or 5-10 fmol/mg protein). Four of the latter group also bear PR (86-450 fmol/mg DNA). Two mouse hybridomas out of seven tested were ER and PR positive. The MOPC 315 myeloma expressed ER but not PR. The possible functional role of these sex hormone binding sites in cell proliferation and immunoglobulin secretion deserves further investigation.     

Progesterone-independent effects of human progesterone receptors (PRs) in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: PR isoform-specific gene regulation and tumor biology

Progesterone receptors (PRs) are prognostic markers in breast cancers irrespective of the patient's progestational status. However, there are two PR isoforms, PR-A and PR-B, that are equimolar in the normal breast but dysregulated in advanced disease. Postmenopausal, tamoxifen-treated patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, PR-A-rich tumors have much faster disease recurrence than patients with PR-B-rich tumors. To study the mechanisms we engineered ER+ breast cancer cells that express each PR isoform under control of an inducible promoter. We identified 79 genes regulated by progesterone (P), mainly by PR-B, and 51 genes regulated without progesterone, mainly by PR-A. Only nine genes were regulated with and without ligand, leading to definition of three classes: I) genes regulated only by liganded PR; II) genes regulated only by unliganded PR; III) genes regulated by both. Unliganded PR-A and PR-B differentially regulate genes that coordinate extracellular signaling pathways and influence tumor cell biology. Indeed, in the absence of P, compared with ER+/PR-B+ or PR- cells, ER+, PR-A+ cells exhibit an aggressive phenotype, are more adhesive to an extracellular matrix, and are more migratory. Additionally, unliganded PR-A and PR-B both inhibit cell growth and provoke resistance to Taxol-induced apoptosis. We propose that PR-A:PR-B ratios, even in the absence of P, influence the biology and treatment response of ER+ tumors, that PR-A isoforms are functionally dominant in P-deficient states, and that PR-A rich tumors are especially aggressive.     

Topographical distribution of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in the human endometrium and Fallopian tube

The topographical distribution of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in the human endometrium and Fallopian tube was investigated by an immunocytochemical technique. A gradient of positively stained cells was observed: the highest oestrogen and progesterone receptor content was noted in the fundal part of the uterine cavity and the ampullar region of the Fallopian tube. The observed gradient is in keeping with biological and pathological events that occur in the human mullerian tract, e.g. fecundation, implantation and carcinogenesis.