Imprinting in plants

This review discusses the modern issues in epigenetic regulation in plants related to the imprinting at the levels of genome, locus, and gene. The data described follow the historical order: from the beginning of research into non-crossability of plant forms with different ploidies to the recent communications about allelic imprinting at r1 locus of maize and the control of synthesis of storage proteins with a high forage value. The classical experiments of Kermicle and Lin on the cytogenetic confirmation of the role of parental genome ratio in the endosperm in a successful development of viable caryopses are described in detail. Uniqueness of the experimental technique used by these authors is emphasized. The variants for overcoming the effect of imprinted signal in apomicts and plants with a tetrasporic embryo sac are considered. A considerable attention is paid to the imprinting in the species with polyploid series and to the hypothesis of endosperm balance number. The issues of potential practical application of imprinting in breeding practice are discussed. The results obtained in this direction demonstrate the ways to increase the forage value of maize zeins.     

Imprinting in Plants and Its Underlying Mechanisms

Genomic imprinting (or imprinting) refers to an epigenetic phenomenon by which the allelic expression of a gene depends on the parent of origin. It has evolved independently in placental mammals and flowering plants. In plants, imprinting is mainly found in endosperm. Recent genome-wide surveys in Arabidopsis, rice, and maize identified hundreds of imprinted genes in endosperm. Since these genes are of diverse functions, endosperm development is regulated at different regulatory levels. The imprinted expression of only a few genes is conserved between Arabidopsis and monocots, suggesting that imprinting evolved quickly during speciation. In Arabidopsis, DEMETER (DME) mediates hypomethylation in the maternal genome at numerous loci (mainly transposons and repeats) in the central cell and results in many differentially methylated regions between parental genomes in the endosperm, and subsequent imprinted expression of some genes. In addition, histone modification mediated by Polycomb group (PcG) proteins is also involved in regulating imprinting. DME-induced hypomethylated alleles in the central cell are considered to produce small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) which are imported to the egg to reinforce DNA methylation. In parallel, the activity of DME in the vegetative cell of the male gametophyte demethylates many regions which overlap with the demethylated regions in the central cell. siRNAs from the demethylated regions are hypothesized to be also transferred into sperm to reinforce DNA methylation. Imprinting is partly the result of genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming in the central cell and vegetative cell and evolved under different selective pressures.     

Epigenetic Resetting of a Gene Imprinted in Plant Embryos

Genomic imprinting resulting in the differential expression of maternal and paternal alleles in the fertilization products has evolved independently in placental mammals and flowering plants. In most cases, silenced alleles carry DNA methylation [1]. Whereas these methylation marks of imprinted genes are generally erased and reestablished in each generation in mammals [2], imprinting marks persist in endosperms [3], the sole tissue of reported imprinted gene expression in plants. Here we show that the maternally expressed in embryo 1 (mee1) gene of maize is imprinted in both the embryo and endosperm and that parent-of-origin-specific expression correlates with differential allelic methylation. This epigenetic asymmetry is maintained in the endosperm, whereas the embryonic maternal allele is demethylated on fertilization and remethylated later in embryogenesis. This report of imprinting in the plant embryo confirms that, as in mammals, epigenetic mechanisms operate to regulate allelic gene expression in both embryonic and extraembryonic structures. The embryonic methylation profile demonstrates that plants evolved a mechanism for resetting parent-specific imprinting marks, a necessary prerequisite for parent-of-origin-dependent gene expression in consecutive generations. The striking difference between the regulation of imprinting in the embryo and endosperm suggests that imprinting mechanisms might have evolved independently in both fertilization products of flowering plants.     

Cell cycle progression during endosperm development in Zea mays depends on parental dosage effects

Interploidy crosses in flowering plants often cause seed abortion. Studies in maize have shown that failure of kernel development results from dosage effects among products of imprinted but as-yet-unknown genes in the endosperm, and that the operative stoichiometry is established for a ratio of two maternal genomes to one paternal genome. In this study, we used flow cytometry to monitor cell cycle activities in developing endosperms obtained after reciprocal crosses between diploid and tetraploid maize individuals. Our data show that dosage effects alter critical events involved in the establishment of endoreduplication during maize endosperm development. Particularly, maternal genomic excess (4x x 2x crosses) forces endosperm cells to enter early into endoreduplication while paternal genomic excess (2x x 4x crosses) prevents its establishment. Our results also suggest that altering mechanisms depend on two different sets of cell cycle regulatory genes--one imprinted through the female that is required for mitotic arrest, and another responsible for re-entry into S phase that is imprinted through the male. Further, molecular and physiological analyses should provide insights into the interaction of parental imprinting action and cell cycle regulation during endosperm development.     

Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana require DNA methylation

Some genes in mammals and flowering plants are subject to parental imprinting, a process by which differential epigenetic marks are imposed on male and female gametes so that one set of alleles is silenced on chromosomes contributed by the mother while another is silenced on paternal chromosomes. Therefore, each genome contributes a different set of active alleles to the offspring, which develop abnormally if the parental genome balance is disturbed. In Arabidopsis, seeds inheriting extra maternal genomes show distinctive phenotypes such as low weight and inhibition of mitosis in the endosperm, while extra paternal genomes result in reciprocal phenotypes such as high weight and endosperm overproliferation. DNA methylation is known to be an essential component of the parental imprinting mechanism in mammals, but there is less evidence for this in plants. For the present study, seed development was examined in crosses using a transgenic Arabidopsis line with reduced DNA methylation. Crosses between hypomethylated and wild-type diploid plants produced similar seed phenotypes to crosses between plants with normal methylation but different ploidies. This is consistent with a model in which hypomethylation of one parental genome prevents silencing of alleles that would normally be active only when inherited from the other parent - thus phenocopying the effects of extra genomes. These results suggest an important role for methylation in parent-of-origin effects, and by inference parental imprinting, in plants. The phenotype of biparentally hypomethylated seeds is less extreme than the reciprocal phenotypes of uniparentally hypomethylated seeds. The observation that development is less severely affected if gametes of both sexes (rather than just one) are 'neutralized' with respect to parent-of-origin effects supports the hypothesis that parental imprinting is not necessary to regulate development.     

DEMETER DNA glycosylase establishes MEDEA polycomb gene self-imprinting by allele-specific demethylation

MEDEA (MEA) is an Arabidopsis Polycomb group gene that is imprinted in the endosperm. The maternal allele is expressed and the paternal allele is silent. MEA is controlled by DEMETER (DME), a DNA glycosylase required to activate MEA expression, and METHYLTRANSFERASE I (MET1), which maintains CG methylation at the MEA locus. Here we show that DME is responsible for endosperm maternal-allele-specific hypomethylation at the MEA gene. DME can excise 5-methylcytosine in vitro and when expressed in E. coli. Abasic sites opposite 5-methylcytosine inhibit DME activity and might prevent DME from generating double-stranded DNA breaks. Unexpectedly, paternal-allele silencing is not controlled by DNA methylation. Rather, Polycomb group proteins that are expressed from the maternal genome, including MEA, control paternal MEA silencing. Thus, DME establishes MEA imprinting by removing 5-methylcytosine to activate the maternal allele. MEA imprinting is subsequently maintained in the endosperm by maternal MEA silencing the paternal allele.     

Genomic imprinting and endosperm development in flowering plants

Genomic imprinting, the parent-of-origin-specific expression of genes, plays an important role in the seed development of flowering plants. As different sets of genes are imprinted and hence silenced in maternal and paternal gametophyte genomes, the contributions of the parental genomes to the offspring are not equal. Imbalance between paternally and maternally imprinted genes, for instance as a result of interploidy crosses, or in seeds in which imprinting has been manipulated, results in aberrant seed development. It is predominantly the endosperm, and not or to a far lesser extent the embryo, that is affected by such imbalance. Deviation from the normal 2m:1p ratio in the endosperm genome has a severe effect on endosperm development, and often leads to seed abortion. Molecular expression data for imprinted genes suggest that genomic imprinting takes place only in the endosperm of the developing seed. Although far from complete, a picture of how imprinting operates in flowering plants has begun to emerge. Imprinted genes on either the maternal or paternal side are marked and silenced in a process involving DNA methylation and chromatin condensation. In addition, on the maternal side, imprinted genes are most probably under control of the polycomb FIS genes.     

Nonadditive expression and parent-of-origin effects identified by microarray and allele-specific expression profiling of maize endosperm

Plant endosperm cells have a nuclear ratio of two maternal genomes to one paternal genome. This 2 to 1 dosage relationship provides a unique system for studying the additivity of gene expression levels in reciprocal hybrids. A combination of microarray profiling and allele-specific expression analysis was performed using RNA isolated from endosperm tissues of maize (Zea mays) inbred lines B73 and Mo17 and their reciprocal hybrids at two developmental stages, 13 and 19 d after pollination. The majority of genes exhibited additive expression in reciprocal hybrids based on microarray analyses. However, a substantial number of genes exhibited nonadditive expression patterns, including maternal like, paternal like, high parent like, low parent like, and expression patterns outside the range of the parental inbreds. The frequency of hybrid expression patterns outside of the parental range in maize endosperm tissue is much higher than that observed for vegetative tissues. For a set of 90 genes, allele-specific expression assays were employed to monitor allelic bias and regulatory variation. Eight of these genes exhibited evidence for maternally or paternally biased expression at multiple stages of endosperm development and are potential examples of differential imprinting. Our data indicate that parental effects on gene expression are much stronger in endosperm than in vegetative tissues.     

Regulation and flexibility of genomic imprinting during seed development

Genomic imprinting results in monoallelic gene expression in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner. It is achieved by the differential epigenetic marking of parental alleles. Over the past decade, studies in the model systems Arabidopsis thaliana and maize (Zea mays) have shown a strong correlation between silent or active states with epigenetic marks, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, but the nature of the primary imprint has not been clearly established for all imprinted genes. Phenotypes and expression patterns of imprinted genes have fueled the perception that genomic imprinting is specific to the endosperm, a seed tissue that does not contribute to the next generation. However, several lines of evidence suggest a potential role for imprinting in the embryo, raising questions as to how imprints are erased and reset from one generation to the next. Imprinting regulation in flowering plants shows striking similarities, but also some important differences, compared with the mechanisms of imprinting described in mammals. For example, some imprinted genes are involved in seed growth and viability in plants, which is similar in mammals, where imprinted gene regulation is essential for embryonic development. However, it seems to be more flexible in plants, as imprinting requirements can be bypassed to allow the development of clonal offspring in apomicts.     

Autonomous endosperm development in flowering plants: how to overcome the imprinting problem?

In the vast majority of sexually reproducing flowering plants, a ratio of 2 maternally derived genomes to 1 paternally derived genome (2m:1p) is essential for normal endosperm development, and therefore ultimately for seed development. Even in many pseudogamous apomicts, where the embryo develops without a paternal contribution, fertilisation of the endosperm to obtain the correct 2m:1p parental ratio is still necessary. How do autonomous apomicts, where both embryo and endosperm develop autonomously, circumvent this requirement? The background for the 2m:1p requirement is that the parental genomes are epigenetically different; in either genome, a set of genes is silenced in a sex-specific way by genomic imprinting. Removal of the imprints from the maternally derived endosperm genome leads to expression of normally maternally silenced genes, and effectively supplies the missing paternal genome. In Arabidopsis, we propose that a combination of the fie mutation and hypomethylation of the genome creates such a situation in the endosperm genome. As a result, in a fie mutant, hypomethylated ovule complete autonomous endosperm development takes place in the absence of fertilisation.     

The maize gene maternal derepression of r1 encodes a DNA glycosylase that demethylates DNA and reduces siRNA expression in the endosperm

Demethylation of transposons can activate the expression of nearby genes and cause imprinted gene expression in the endosperm; this demethylation is hypothesized to lead to expression of transposon small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that reinforce silencing in the next generation through transfer either into egg or embryo. Here we describe maize (Zea mays) maternal derepression of r1 (mdr1), which encodes a DNA glycosylase with homology to Arabidopsis thaliana DEMETER and which is partially responsible for demethylation of thousands of regions in endosperm. Instead of promoting siRNA expression in endosperm, MDR1 activity inhibits it. Methylation of most repetitive DNA elements in endosperm is not significantly affected by MDR1, with an exception of Helitrons. While maternally-expressed imprinted genes preferentially overlap with MDR1 demethylated regions, the majority of genes that overlap demethylated regions are not imprinted. Double mutant megagametophytes lacking both MDR1 and its close homolog DNG102 result in early seed failure, and double mutant microgametophytes fail pre-fertilization. These data establish DNA demethylation by glycosylases as essential in maize endosperm and pollen and suggest that neither transposon repression nor genomic imprinting is its main function in endosperm.

Demethylation by DNA glycosylases is important for endosperm development, but only a subset of the affected loci are imprinted, suggesting demethylation may have additional functions.

IN A NUTSHELL Background: In 1970, Jerry Kermicle reported that maize kernels could have dramatically different pigmentation depending on which parent the r1 gene is inherited from. This was the first discovery of many genomically imprinted genes that are selectively expressed from the maternal genome in endosperm. Later, Kermicle also discovered a mutant with poor maternal r1 expression. He hypothesized that the normal function of the mutated gene would be to derepress maternal r1; hence the name maternal depression of r1 (mdr1). The identify of mdr1 has remained unknown since then, but studies using Arabidopsis thaliana have revealed that DNA demethylation by enzymes called DNA glycosylases is important for expression of some maternally inherited genes in endosperm. Question: We wanted to identify the mdr1 gene. We hypothesized that mdr1 would reveal insights into molecular mechanisms of genomic imprinting in maize. Findings: We discovered that mdr1 encodes one of two DNA glycosylases with high expression in endosperm. We found that at least one of the two must be functional for endosperm to develop normally, but the one encoded by mdr1 is expressed higher. Surprisingly, most of the genes the mdr1 DNA glycosylase demethylates do not appear to be genomically imprinted, and about half the DNA it demethylates is not even near genes. These findings suggest that DNA glycosylases also have an undiscovered function unrelated to genomic imprinting in endosperm. Next steps: We want to know how specific regions in the genome are targeted for demethylation. What distinguishes these regions from other regions in endosperm? And what keeps them from being demethylated in other tissues? On the flip side, little is known about the effect of demethylation in endosperm, other than genomic imprinting. We want to know what effect DNA demethylation by DNA glycosylases has on chromatin structure and why it is important.     

基因组印迹与种子发育

胚乳介导营养物质从母体到胚的转运过程,是开花植物中发生印迹的重要部位。胚乳的发育异常会导致胚的败育。在拟南芥中已鉴定到三个FIS (fertilization-independent seed) 基因,能制止无需受精即形成种子的发育过程,即FIS1/ MEDEA、FIS2和FIS3/FIE。其中MEDEA基因是胚乳发育的主要调控基因,在胚乳中被印迹。FWA基因也在胚乳中被印迹。系统阐述了植物基因组印迹的机理以及MEA和FWA印迹机制的研究进展,并介绍了印迹发生的亲本冲突学说、印迹的方式及其它已报道的印迹基因。     

Genomic imprinting in plants: observations and evolutionary implications

The epigenetic phenomenon of genomic imprinting occurs among both plants and animals. In species where imprinting is observed, there are parent-of-origin effects on the expression of imprinted genes in offspring. This review focuses on imprinting in plants with examples from maize, where gene imprinting was first described, and Arabidopsis. Our current understanding of imprinting in plants is presented in the context of cytosine methylation and imprinting in mammals, where developmentally essential genes are imprinted. Important considerations include the structure and organization of imprinted genes and the role of regional, differential methylation. Imprinting in plants may be related to other epigenetic phenomena including paramutation and transgene silencing. Finally, we discuss the role of gene structure and evolutionary implications of imprinting in plants.     

A statistical model for estimating maternal-zygotic interactions and parent-of-origin effects of QTLs for seed development

Proper development of a seed requires coordinated exchanges of signals among the three components that develop side by side in the seed. One of these is the maternal integument that encloses the other two zygotic components, i.e., the diploid embryo and its nurturing annex, the triploid endosperm. Although the formation of the embryo and endosperm contains the contributions of both maternal and paternal parents, maternally and paternally derived alleles may be expressed differently, leading to a so-called parent-of-origin or imprinting effect. Currently, the nature of how genes from the maternal and zygotic genomes interact to affect seed development remains largely unknown. Here, we present a novel statistical model for estimating the main and interaction effects of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) that are derived from different genomes and further testing the imprinting effects of these QTLs on seed development. The experimental design used is based on reciprocal backcrosses toward both parents, so that the inheritance of parent-specific alleles could be traced. The computing model and algorithm were implemented with the maximum likelihood approach. The new strategy presented was applied to study the mode of inheritance for QTLs that control endoreduplication traits in maize endosperm. Monte Carlo simulation studies were performed to investigate the statistical properties of the new model with the data simulated under different imprinting degrees. The false positive rate of imprinting QTL discovery by the model was examined by analyzing the simulated data that contain no imprinting QTL. The reciprocal design and a series of analytical and testing strategies proposed provide a standard procedure for genomic mapping of QTLs involved in the genetic control of complex seed development traits in flowering plants.