Overexpression of aldo-keto reductase 1C3 (AKR1C3) in LNCaP cells diverts androgen metabolism towards testosterone resulting in resistance to the 5α-reductase inhibitor finasteride

Type 5 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (AKR1C3) is the major enzyme in the prostate that reduces 4-androstene-3,17-dione (Δ(4)-Adione) to the androgen receptor (AR) ligand testosterone. AKR1C3 is upregulated in prostate cancer (PCa) and castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) that develops after androgen deprivation therapy. PCa and CRPC often depend on intratumoral androgen biosynthesis and upregulation of AKR1C3 could contribute to intracellular synthesis of AR ligands and stimulation of proliferation through AR signaling. To test this hypothesis, we developed an LNCaP prostate cancer cell line overexpressing AKR1C3 (LNCaP-AKR1C3) and compared its metabolic and proliferative responses to Δ(4)-Adione treatment with that of the parental, AKR1C3 negative LNCaP cells. In LNCaP and LNCaP-AKR1C3 cells, metabolism proceeded via 5α-reduction to form 5α-androstane-3,17-dione and then (epi)androsterone-3-glucuronide. LNCaP-AKR1C3 cells made significantly higher amounts of testosterone-17β-glucuronide. When 5α-reductase was inhibited by finasteride, the production of testosterone-17β-glucuronide was further elevated in LNCaP-AKR1C3 cells. When AKR1C3 activity was inhibited with indomethacin the production of testosterone-17β-glucuronide was significantly decreased. Δ(4)-Adione treatment stimulated cell proliferation in both cell lines. Finasteride inhibited LNCaP cell proliferation, consistent with 5α-androstane-3,17-dione acting as the major metabolite that stimulates growth by binding to the mutated AR. However, LNCaP-AKR1C3 cells were resistant to the growth inhibitory properties of finasteride, consistent with the diversion of Δ(4)-Adione metabolism from 5α-reduced androgens to increased formation of testosterone. Indomethacin did not result in differences in Δ(4)-Adione induced proliferation since this treatment led to the same metabolic profile in LNCaP and LNCaP-AKR1C3 cells. We conclude that AKR1C3 overexpression diverts androgen metabolism to testosterone that results in proliferation in androgen sensitive prostate cancer. This effect is seen despite high levels of uridine glucuronosyl transferases suggesting that AKR1C3 activity can surmount the effects of this elimination pathway. Treatment options in prostate cancer that target 5α-reductase where AKR1C3 co-exists may be less effective due to the diversion of Δ(4)-Adione to testosterone.     

The androgen receptor in LNCaP cells contains a mutation in the ligand binding domain which affects steroid binding characteristics and response to antiandrogens

The human prostate tumor cell line LNCaP containd an abnormal androgen receptor system with broad steroid binding specificity. Progestagens, estradiol and several antiandrogens compete with androgens for binding to the androgen receptor in the cells to a higher extent than in other androgen sensitive systems. Optimal growth of LNCaP cells is observed after addition of the synthetic androgen R1881 (0.1 nM). In addition, estrogens, progestagens and several antiandrogens do not inhibit androgen responsive growth, but have striking growth stimulatory effects and increase EGF receptor level and acid phosphatase secretion. We have found that the androgen receptor in the LNCaP cells contains a single point mutation changing the sense of codon 868 (Thr to Ala) in the ligand binding domain. Expression vectors containing the normal or mutated androgen receptor sequence were transfected into COS or HeLa cells. Androgens, progestagens, estrogens and several antiandrogens bind the mutated androgen receptor proteon and activate the expression of an androgen-regulated reporter gene (GRE-tk-CAT), indicating that the mutation directly affects both binding specificity and the induction of gene expression. Interestingly, the antiandrogen casodex showed antiandrogenic properties in growth studies of LNCaP cells and did not induced reporter gene activity in Hela cells transfected with the mutant receptor. The mutated androgen receptor of LNCaP cells is therefore a useful tool in the elucidation of different levels of action of steroids and antisteroids.     

Arylisothiocyanato selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) for prostate cancer

A new series of androgen receptor targeted agents (ARTA) was prepared and tested in androgen-dependent and -independent prostate cancer cell lines. These agents were bicalutamide analogs with isothiocyanato substituted B-rings. Also, the linker sulfone of R-bicalutamide was maintained or replaced with several alternative linkages including ether, amine, N-methylamine, thioether, and methylene (in this case the product was a racemic mixture) functional groups at the X-position. To expand the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of these arylisothiocyanato AR ligands, B-ring halogenated arylisothiocyanato ligands were also prepared and tested. The arylisothiocyanato AR ligands showed strong binding affinities to AR ranging from 0.6 to 54 nM. Among them, thioether and ether linkages demonstrated high binding affinities (0.6 and 4.6 nM, respectively) and selective cell growth inhibition (approximately 3- to 6-fold) for LNCaP, an androgen-dependent prostate cancer cell line, when compared to the androgen independent prostate cell lines (DU145, PC-3, and PPC-1) and a bladder cell line (TSU-Pr1). However, the ligands were inactive (IC50>100 mM) in a normal monkey kidney cell line (CV-1) that was used as the control for non-specific toxicity.     

Stimulatory effects of antiandrogens on LNCaP human prostate tumor cell growth, EGF-receptor level and acid phosphatase secretion

LNCaP cells (derived from a lymph node carcinoma of the human prostate) show androgen responsive growth. Progestagens, estradiol and antiandrogens competed with androgens for binding to the androgen receptor in the cells to a higher extent than in other androgen-sensitive systems. Optimal growth (3–4 fold increase in DNA content of 6 day cell cultures vs controls) was observed after addition of the synthetic androgen R1881 (0.1 nM). Both steroidal and non-steroidal antiandrogens did not suppress the androgen responsive growth. At a concentration of 10 nM cyproterone acetate or 100 nM RU 23908, growth was even stimulated to an extent comparable to that observed after addition of androgen. Cyproterone acetate and RU 23908 also increased the number of epidermal growth factor receptors expressed at the cell surface to a comparable level as did the androgen. Like androgens, cyproterone acetate, RU 23908 or estradiol stimulated the secretion per cell of prostate specific acid phosphatase in the culture fluid. In conclusion, antiandrogens can exert striking stimulatory effects on the proliferation of LNCaP cells probably due to a defective androgen receptor system. It is discussed that comparable changes in the specificity of the androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells may give these cells an advantage in growth rate and may contribute to development of tumors characterized as hormone independent.     

Regulation of growth of LNCaP human prostate tumor cells by growth factors and steroid hormones

The mitogenic activity of several growth factors on androgen responsive LNCaP human prostate tumor cells was studied. A two-fold stimulation of cell proliferation was observed after a culture period of 6 days in 1 ng EGF/ml, 10 ng TGF-alpha/ml or 20 ng basic FGF/ml. TGF-beta (0.02 ng/ml), which did not affect cell proliferation when added alone to the culture medium, inhibited the EGF- and TGF-alpha-induced growth. The synthetic androgen R1881 (0.1 nM) stimulated cell proliferation three-fold and increased the number of EGF receptors from 11500 to 28500 sites/cell. One of the mechanisms involved in androgen action on these cells is therefore an increased EGF receptor expression and increased sensitivity to EGF. TGF-beta did not directly affect androgen-responsive growth but inhibited the synergistic effect of EGF. A considerable expression of TGF alpha (precursors) could be demonstrated on the cells by immunohistochemical staining. However the staining intensity was not affected by androgens. These results make it less likely that androgen-responsive growth is mediated by regulation of secretion of an EGF- or TGF alpha-like activity, which in turn acts in an autocrine manner to stimulate growth. Estrogens, progestagens and antiandrogens do not inhibit androgen responsive growth of LNCaP cells but have striking growth stimulatory effects, increase EGF receptor level and increase acid phosphatase secretion. LNCaP cells contain a modified androgen receptor system with respect to both steroid specificity and antiandrogen sensitivity. It has recently been shown that the stimulatory effects are due to a mutated amino acid in the steroid binding domain of the androgen receptor.     

A differential ligand-mediated response of green fluorescent protein-tagged androgen receptor in living prostate cancer and non-prostate cancer cell lines.

Androgen has been shown to promote the proliferation of prostate cancer through the action of the androgen receptor (AR). Mutation (T877A) of the AR gene found in an androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP, has been postulated to be involved in hypersensitivity and loss of specificity for androgen. In the present study, trafficking of AR and AR (T877A) in living prostate and non-prostate cancer cell lines under high and low concentrations of androgen and antiandrogen was investigated by tagging green fluorescent protein (GFP) to the receptors. In the presence of a high concentration of androgen, AR-GFP localized in the nucleus by forming discrete clusters in all cell lines. AR (T877A)-GFP was also translocated to the nucleus in LNCaP and COS-1 cells by the addition of a high concentration of androgen. In contrast, in the presence of a low concentration of androgen, the translocation of AR-GFP and AR (T877A)-GFP was observed in LNCaP cells, but not in COS-1 cells. Upon the addition of antiandrogen, AR-GFP was translocated to the nucleus but did not form subnuclear foci in both COS-1 and LNCaP cells, whereas AR (T877A)-GFP in both cells was translocated to the nucleus with subnuclear foci. The present study demonstrates the differential response of nuclear trafficking of AR and its mutant in prostate cancer cell lines and COS cells, and the subcellular and subnuclear compartmentalization provide important information on the sensitivity of the AR mutation.     

Hormone depletion-insensitivity of prostate cancer cells is supported by the AR without binding to classical response elements

A need for androgen response elements (AREs) for androgen receptor (AR)-dependent growth of hormone depletion-insensitive prostate cancer is generally presumed. In such cells, androgen-independent activation by AR of certain genes has been attributed to selective increases in basal associations of AR with putative enhancers. We examined the importance of AR binding to DNA in prostate cancer cells in which proliferation in the absence of hormone was profoundly (～ 90%) dependent on endogenous AR and where the receptor was not up-regulated or mutated but was predominantly nuclear. Here, ARE-mediated promoter activation and the binding of AR to a known ARE in the chromatin remained entirely androgen dependent, and the cells showed an androgen-responsive gene expression profile with an unaltered sensitivity to androgen dose. In the same cells, a different set of genes primarily enriched for cell division functions was activated by AR independently of hormone and significantly overlapped the signature gene overexpression profile of hormone ablation-insensitive clinical tumors. After knockdown of endogenous AR, hormone depletion-insensitive cell proliferation and AR apoprotein-dependent gene expression were rescued by an AR mutant that was unable to bind to ARE but that could transactivate through a well-established AR tethering protein. Hormone depletion-insensitive AR binding sites in the chromatin were functional, binding, and responding to both the wild-type and the mutant AR and lacked enrichment for canonical or noncanonical ARE half-sites. Therefore, a potentially diverse set of ARE-independent mechanisms of AR interactions with target genes must underlie truly hormone depletion-insensitive gene regulation and proliferation in prostate cancer.     

Redox-dependent DNA binding of the purified androgen receptor: evidence for disulfide-linked androgen receptor dimers.

Full-length histidine-tagged, dihydrotestosterone-bound human androgen receptor (AR) was purified to homogeneity by affinity and gel-filtration chromatography for antibody production and analysis of AR dimerization and DNA binding properties. A monoclonal antibody was raised that recognized human and rat AR epitope (360)ArgAspTyrTyrAsnPheProLeuAla(368) in the NH(2)-terminal domain and slowed migration of AR-DNA complexes in mobility shift assays. AR binding to androgen response element DNA had a K(d) of 2.0 nM and a Hill coefficient of 2.1, indicating high-affinity, cooperative binding. AR solution dimerization was detected only at >/=0.2 microM AR, and DNA binding increased dimerization up to 30-fold. Slow- and fast-migrating AR-DNA complexes were detected under different reducing conditions that differed 5-fold in their dissociation rates from DNA. Treatment with the sulfhydryl oxidizing reagent diamide formed the faster migrating, slower dissociating complex, indicating it represents disulfide-linked AR dimers bound to DNA. The results indicate that high concentrations of purified AR are required for solution dimerization and that cooperative DNA binding stabilizes two dimer forms that differ in redox state.     

Inhibition of growth and induction of apoptosis by androgens of a variant of LNCaP cell line

Here are described the effects of androgens, and other molecules known to bind to androgen receptors (AR), on MOP cells established from the human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP. MOP cells contained AR: 100 000 binding sites/cell, K_D for 5 dihydrotestosterone (DHT) 0.5 nM, size 110 kDa. The AR gene has the same repetition polymorphism in exon 1 and the T876A mutation in exon 8 as LNCaP. The proliferation of MOP cells in culture was repressed by the synthetic androgen 17β-hydroxy-17-methyl-estra-4,9,11-trien-3-one (R 1881), the antiandrogen cyproterone acetate (CYPA), estradiol (E2), progesterone and the synthetic progestin promegestone: 17,21 dimethyl-19 nor-4,9 pregnandiene-3,20 dione (R 5020). The number of cells recovered after 7 days decreased to ≈40% of controls. ED₇₀s ranged between 50 pM for R 1881 to 50 nM for E2 and CYPA. Treatment with R 1881 decreased [³H]thymidine incorporation into DNA and increased dramatically the doubling time. R 1881, CYPA and E2 blocked the cell cycle between G1 and S phases and they induced apototosis as demonstrated by the increase of blebs on the plasma membrane, nuclear fragmentation, TdT-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL)-positive cells and internucleosomal DNA breaks. In athymic nude mice, testosterone enanthate prevented the growth of MOP tumors and, when tumors did develop, brought about regression. However, the tumors did not regress completely and finally escaped treatment. In conclusion, a variant of the LNCaP cell line has been established. With these cells it was possible to confirm that androgens paradoxically repress the growth of some prostate cancer cells both in culture and in vivo. In addition it is demonstrated in culture but not in vivo, for the first time to the authors’ knowledge, that a synthetic androgen is able to induce apoptosis of cells established from human prostate carcinoma.     

4-(Anilino)pyrrole-2-carboxamides: Novel non-steroidal/non-anilide type androgen antagonists effective upon human prostate tumor LNCaP cells with mutated nuclear androgen receptor

Various 4-(anilino)pyrrole-2-carboxamides were designed and synthesized as novel androgen receptor (AR) antagonists without steroidal or anilide structure, based on our strategy for developing full antagonists of nuclear receptors. Introduction of a bulky N-alkyl group, such as a cyclohexylmethyl or benzyl group, increased the binding affinity for wild-type AR and the potency for growth inhibition of androgen-dependent SC-3 cells. Among the compounds obtained, N-[4-[(benzyl)(4-nitrophenyl)amino]-1-methylpyrrole-2-carbonyl]pyrrolidine (22) is as potent an AR antagonist as the typical anilide-type AR antagonists hydroxyflutamide and bicalutamide. Further, compound 22 had potent binding affinity for T877A mutated AR, and dose-dependently inhibited the testosterone-induced production of prostate-specific antigen in LNCaP cells bearing T877A AR.     

A dominant-negative mutant of androgen receptor coregulator ARA54 inhibits androgen receptor-mediated prostate cancer growth.

The ligand-bound androgen receptor (AR) regulates target genes via a mechanism involving coregulators such as androgen receptor-associated 54 (ARA54). We investigated whether the interruption of the AR coregulator function could lead to down-regulation of AR activity. Using in vitro mutagenesis and a yeast two-hybrid screening assay, we have isolated a mutant ARA54 (mt-ARA54) carrying a point mutation at amino acid 472 changing a glutamic acid to lysine, which acts as a dominant-negative inhibitor of AR transactivation. In transient transfection assays of prostate cancer cell lines, the mt-ARA54 suppressed endogenous mutated AR-mediated and exogenous wild-type AR-mediated transactivation in LNCaP and PC-3 cells, respectively. In DU145 cells, the mt-ARA54 suppressed exogenous ARA54 but not other coregulators, such as ARA55-enhanced or SRC-1-enhanced AR transactivation. In the LNCaP cells stably transfected with the plasmids encoding the mt-ARA54 under the doxycycline inducible system, the overexpression of the mt-ARA54 inhibited cell growth and endogenous expression of prostate-specific antigen. Mammalian two-hybrid assays further demonstrated that the mt-ARA54 can disrupt the interaction between wild-type ARA54 molecules, suggesting that ARA54 dimerization or oligomerization may play an essential role in the enhancement of AR transactivation. Together, our results demonstrate that a dominant-negative AR coregulator can suppress AR transactivation and cell proliferation in prostate cancer cells. Further studies may provide a new therapeutic approach for blocking AR-mediated prostate cancer growth.     

Androgen receptor down regulation by small interference RNA induces cell growth inhibition in androgen sensitive as well as in androgen independent prostate cancer cells

We investigated the effects of androgen receptor (AR) down regulation with a small interference RNA molecule (siRNA_AR(start)) on androgen sensitive LNCaP and androgen independent LNCaPabl prostate cancer cells, the latter representing an in vitro model for the development of therapy resistance in prostate cancer. Although LNCaPabl cells express increased levels of AR in comparison with androgen sensitive LNCaP cells, the protein was significantly down regulated in response to siRNA_AR(start) treatment. This AR down regulation resulted in a marked cell growth inhibition in both cell lines. By contrast, DU-145 prostate cancer cells, which lack AR expression, were not inhibited by the siRNA_AR(start). In consequence to AR down regulation, both cell lines, LNCaP and LNCaPabl, shared a highly similar gene expression profile in terms of major changes in cell cycle regulatory genes. The cell cycle inhibitor p21(Waf1/Cip1) as well as cyclin D1 were significantly up regulated by siRNA_AR(start) treatment, considering a switch in cyclin expression towards cell cycle retardation. Control molecules had moderate effects on cell proliferation and gene expression, respectively. In summary, we found that AR inhibition with siRNA induces cell growth retardation in androgen sensitive as well as in androgen independent prostate cancer cells and thus may represent an interesting approach to combat hormone-refractory prostate cancer.     

Androgen inhibits the growth of carcinoma cell lines established from prostate cancer xenografts that escape androgen treatment

Most prostate cancers escape endocrine therapy by diverse mechanisms. One of them might be growth repression by androgen. We reported that androgen represses the growth in culture of MOP cells (a sub-line of LNCaP cells) and that of MOP cell xenografts, although tumor growth becomes androgen-independent (AI). Here we explore whether AI tumors contain androgen-responsive cells. ME carcinoma cells were established from AI tumors. The responses to androgen were examined by cell counting, DAPI labeling, flow cytometry, PSA immunoassay and tumor size follow-up. Androgen receptors (AR) were analyzed by western blotting and DNA sequencing. The pattern of responses of these cells to androgen was compared to that of MOP cells and that of JAC cells established from LNCaP-like MOP cells. R1881, a synthetic androgen: (1) repressed the growth of all the six ME cell lines obtained, MOP and JAC cells, (2) augmented the secretion of PSA, (3) induced spectacular cell bubbling/fragmentation and (4) blocked the cell cycle and induced a modest increase of apoptosis. All the androgen-repressed cells expressed the same level of mutated AR as LNCaP cells. In nude mice, the growth of ME-2 cell xenografts displayed transient androgen repression similar to that of MOP cells. In culture neither fibroblasts nor extra-cellular matrix altered the effects of R1881 on cell proliferation. These results demonstrate that androgen-independent tumors contain androgen-responsive cells. The apparent discrepancy between the responses to androgen of tumors and those of carcinoma cells in culture suggests that microenvironmental factors contribute to the androgen responsiveness of tumor cells in vivo. These modifications, albeit unspecified, could be suitable targets for restoring the androgen responsiveness of AI tumors.