Coupling between codon usage, translation and protein export in Escherichia coli

Proteins destined for export via the Sec-dependent pathway are synthesized with a short N-terminal signal peptide. A requirement for export is that the proteins are in a translocationally competent state. This is a loosely folded state that allows the protein to pass through the SecYEG apparatus and pass into the periplasm. In order to maintain pre-secretory proteins in an export-competent state, there are many factors that slow the folding of the pre-secretory protein in the cytoplasm. These include cytoplasmic chaperones, such as SecB, and the signal recognition particle, which bind the pre-secretory protein and direct it to the cytoplasmic membrane for export. Recently, evidence has been published that non-optimal codons in the signal sequence are important for a time-critical early event to allow the correct folding of pre-secretory proteins. This review details the recent developments in folding of the signal peptide and the pre-secretory protein.     

Escherichia coli SecB stimulates export without maintaining export competence of ribose-binding protein signal sequence mutants.

Ribose-binding protein (RBP) is exported to the periplasm of Escherichia coli via the general export pathway. An rbsB-lacZ gene fusion was constructed and used to select mutants defective in RBP export. The spontaneous Lac+ mutants isolated in this selection contained either single-amino-acid substitutions or a deletion of the RBP signal sequence. Intact rbsB genes containing eight different point mutations in the signal sequence were reconstructed, and the effects of the mutations on RBP export were examined. Most of the mutations caused severe defects in RBP export. In addition, different suppressor mutations in SecY/PrlA protein were analyzed for their effects on the export of RBP signal sequence mutants in the presence or absence of SecB. Several RBP signal sequence mutants were efficiently suppressed, but others were not suppressed. Export of an RBP signal sequence mutant in prlA mutant strains was partially dependent on SecB, which is in contrast to the SecB independence of wild-type RBP export. However, the kinetics of export of an RBP signal sequence mutant point to a rapid loss of pre-RBP export competence, which occurs in strains containing or lacking SecB. These results suggest that SecB does not stabilize the export-competent conformation of RBP and may affect translocation by stabilizing the binding of pre-RBP at the translocation site.     

Use of thioredoxin as a reporter to identify a subset of Escherichia coli signal sequences that promote signal recognition particle-dependent translocation

We have previously reported that the DsbA signal sequence promotes efficient, cotranslational translocation of the cytoplasmic protein thioredoxin-1 via the bacterial signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway. However, two commonly used signal sequences, those of PhoA and MalE, which promote export by a posttranslational mechanism, do not export thioredoxin. We proposed that this difference in efficiency of export was due to the rapid folding of thioredoxin in the cytoplasm; cotranslational export by the DsbA signal sequence avoids the problem of cytoplasmic folding (C. F. Schierle, M. Berkmen, D. Huber, C. Kumamoto, D. Boyd, and J. Beckwith, J. Bacteriol. 185:5706-5713, 2003). Here, we use thioredoxin as a reporter to distinguish SRP-dependent from non-SRP-dependent cleavable signal sequences. We screened signal sequences exhibiting a range of hydrophobicity values based on a method that estimates hydrophobicity. Successive iterations of screening and refining the method defined a threshold hydrophobicity required for SRP recognition. While all of the SRP-dependent signal sequences identified were above this threshold, there were also a few signal sequences above the threshold that did not utilize the SRP pathway. These results suggest that a simple measure of the hydrophobicity of a signal sequence is an important but not a sufficient indicator for SRP recognition. In addition, by fusing a number of both classes of signal sequences to DsbA, we found that DsbA utilizes an SRP-dependent signal sequence to achieve efficient export to the periplasm. Our results suggest that those proteins found to be exported by SRP-dependent signal sequences may require this mode of export because of their tendency to fold rapidly in the cytoplasm.     

A signal sequence is not required for protein export in prlA mutants of Escherichia coli.

The prlA/secY gene, which codes for an integral membrane protein component of the Escherichia coli protein export machinery, is the locus of the strongest suppressors of signal sequence mutations. We demonstrate that two exported proteins of E.coli, maltose-binding protein and alkaline phosphatase, each lacking its entire signal sequence, are exported to the periplasm in several prlA mutants. The export efficiency can be substantial; in a strain carrying the prlA4 allele, 30% of signal-sequenceless alkaline phosphatase is exported to the periplasm. Other components of the E.coli export machinery, including SecA, are required for this export. SecB is required for the export of signal-sequenceless alkaline phosphatase even though the normal export of alkaline phosphatase does not require this chaperonin. Our findings indicate that signal sequences confer speed and efficiency upon the export process, but that they are not always essential for export. Entry into the export pathway may involve components that so overlap in function that the absence of a signal sequence can be compensated for, or there may exist one or more means of entry that do not require signal sequences at all.     

Experimental confirmation of a key role for non-optimal codons in protein export

Non-optimal codons are defined by low usage and low abundance of corresponding tRNA, and have an established role in translational pausing to allow the correct folding of proteins. Our previous work reported a striking abundance of non-optimal codons in the signal sequences of secretory proteins exported via the sec-dependent pathway in Escherichia coli. In the current study the signal sequence of maltose-binding protein (MBP) was altered so that non-optimal codons were substituted with the most optimal codon from their synonymous codon family. The expression of MBP from the optimized allele (malE-opt) was significantly less than wild-type malE. Expression of MBP from malE-opt was partially restored in a range of cytoplasmic and periplasmic protease deficient strains, confirming that reduced expression of MBP in malE-opt was due to its preferential degradation by cytoplasmic and periplasmic proteases. These data confirm a novel role for non-optimal codon usage in secretion by slowing the rate of translation across the N-terminal signal sequence to facilitate proper folding of the secreted protein.     

A mutation of Escherichia coli SecA protein that partially compensates for the absence of SecB.

The Escherichia coli SecB protein is a cytosolic chaperone protein that is required for rapid export of a subset of exported proteins. To aid in elucidation of the activities of SecB that contribute to rapid export kinetics, mutations that partially suppressed the export defect caused by the absence of SecB were selected. One of these mutations improves protein export in the absence of SecB and is the result of a duplication of SecA coding sequences, leading to the synthesis of a large, in-frame fusion protein. Unexpectedly, this mutation conferred a second phenotype. The secA mutation exacerbated the defective protein export caused by point mutations in the signal sequence of pre-maltose-binding protein. One explanation for these results is that the mutant SecA protein has sustained a duplication of its binding site(s) for exported protein precursors so that the mutant SecA is altered in its interaction with precursor molecules.     

The presence of both the signal sequence and a region of mature LamB protein is required for the interaction of LamB with the export factor SecB

In the accompanying paper (Altman, E., Bankaitis, V.A., and Emr, S.D. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 18148-18153) a putative SecB binding site was identified in the mature LamB protein. The export of wild-type LamB was unperturbed when this region was removed, however, suggesting the presence of a second site of interaction between SecB and LamB. In this paper we show that the interference caused by export-defective LamB proteins is influenced by the amount of signal sequence that is present. If a large portion of the signal sequence is deleted then the interference levels are significantly reduced. This result suggests that a region of the signal sequence contributes to the interaction of SecB with the LamB protein. Using anti-SecB affinity chromatography, we demonstrated directly that the association of SecB protein with precursor LamB is dependent on the presence of both the LamB signal sequence and the interfering region which maps to amino acids 320-380 of mature LamB. Although the interfering region is not necessary for the export of wild-type LamB under normal conditions, when the signal sequence is mutationally altered the interfering region is required to promote the efficient export of LamB protein. Also, deletion of the interfering region eliminates the ability of wild-type LamB precursor to be maintained in an export competent conformation in vivo. Collectively, our results indicate that efficient export of the LamB protein is achieved by an interaction with SecB that involves both the LamB signal sequence and the interfering region in mature LamB.     

SecB-independent export of Escherichia coli ribose-binding protein (RBP): some comparisons with export of maltose-binding protein (MBP) and studies with RBP-MBP hybrid proteins.

The efficient export of the Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein (MBP) is known to be SecB dependent, whereas ribose-binding protein (RBP) export is SecB independent. When the MBP and RBP signal peptides were exchanged precisely at the signal peptidase processing sites, the resultant RBP-MBP and MBP-RBP hybrid proteins both were efficiently exported in SecB+ cells. However, only MBP-RBP was efficiently exported in SecB- cells; RBP-MBP exhibited a significant export defect, a finding that was consistent with previous proposals that SecB specifically interacts with the mature moiety of precursor MBP to promote export. The relatively slow, totally posttranslational export mode exhibited by certain mutant RBP and MBP-RBP species in SecB+ cells was not affected by the loss of SecB. In contrast, MBP and RBP-MBP species with similarly altered signal peptides were totally export defective in SecB- cells. Both export-defective MBP and RBP-MBP interfered with SecB-mediated protein export by depleting cells of functional SecB. In contrast, neither export-defective RBP nor MBP-RBP elicited such an interference effect. These and other data indicated that SecB is unable to interact with precursor RBP or that any interaction between these two proteins is considerably weaker than that of SecB with precursor MBP. In addition, no correlation could be established between a SecB requirement for export and PrlA-mediated suppression of signal peptide export defects. Finally, previous studies have established that wild-type MBP export can be accomplished cotranslationally, whereas wild-type RBP export is strictly a posttranslational process. In this study, cotranslational export was not detected for either MBP-RBP or RBP-MBP. This indicates that the export mode exhibited by a given precursor protein (cotranslational versus posttranslational) is determined by properties of both the signal peptide and the mature moiety.     

Mutations that improve export of maltose-binding protein in SecB- cells of Escherichia coli.

It previously has been proposed that the Escherichia coli SecB protein promotes the export of the maltose-binding protein (MBP) from the cytoplasm by preventing the folding of the precursor MBP (preMBP) into a translocation-incompetent conformation. The export of wild-type MBP is only partially blocked in SecB- cells. In contrast, the export of MBP16-1, an MBP species with a defective signal peptide, is totally dependent on SecB; hence, SecB- cells that synthesize MBP16-1 are unable to utilize maltose as a sole carbon source. The selection of Mal+ revertants primarily yielded mutants with alterations in the MBP16-1 signal peptide that permitted SecB-independent MBP export to the periplasm to various extents. Although each of these alterations increased the overall hydrophobicity of the signal peptide, it was not possible to strictly equate changes in hydrophobicity with the degree of SecB-independent export. Somewhat unexpectedly, two mutants were obtained in which MBP export in SecB- cells was markedly superior to that of the wild-type MBP. Although wild-type MBP is not cotranslationally translocated in SecB- cells, the two mutant proteins designated MBP172 and MBP173 exhibited significant cotranslational export in the absence of SecB. Thus, the role of SecB was partially supplanted by a signal peptide that promoted more rapid movement of MBP through the export pathway. When preMBP included the MBP172 signal peptide as well as an alteration in the mature moiety that slows folding, the SecB requirement for maximal MBP export efficiency was almost totally eliminated. These results provide additional strong support for the proposed antifolding role of SecB in MBP export.     

Involvement of SecB, a chaperone, in the export of ribose-binding protein.

Ribose-binding protein (RBP) is an exported protein of Escherichia coli that functions in the periplasm. The export of RBP involves the secretion machinery of the cell, consisting of a cytoplasmic protein, SecA, and the integral membrane translocation complex, including SecE and SecY. SecB protein, a chaperone known to mediate the export of some periplasmic and outer membrane proteins, was previously reported not to be involved in RBP translocation even though small amounts of in vitro complexes between SecB and RBP have been detected. In our investigation, it was shown that a dependence on SecB could be demonstrated under conditions in which export was compromised. Species of RBP which carry two mutations, one in the leader that blocks export and a second in the mature protein which partially suppresses the export defect, were shown to be affected by SecB for efficient translocation. Five different changes which suppress the effect of the signal sequence mutation -17LP are all located in the N domain of the tertiary structure of RBP. All species of RBP show similar interaction with SecB. Furthermore, a leaky mutation, -14AE, generated by site-specific mutagenesis causes reduced export in the absence of SecB. These results indicate that SecB can interact with RBP during secretion, although it is not absolutely required under normal circumstances.     

The DsbA signal sequence directs efficient, cotranslational export of passenger proteins to the Escherichia coli periplasm via the signal recognition particle pathway

The Escherichia coli cytoplasmic protein thioredoxin 1 can be efficiently exported to the periplasmic space by the signal sequence of the DsbA protein (DsbAss) but not by the signal sequence of alkaline phosphatase (PhoA) or maltose binding protein (MBP). Using mutations of the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway, we found that DsbAss directs thioredoxin 1 to the SRP export pathway. When DsbAss is fused to MBP, MBP also is directed to the SRP pathway. We show directly that the DsbAss-promoted export of MBP is largely cotranslational, in contrast to the mode of MBP export when the native signal sequence is utilized. However, both the export of thioredoxin 1 by DsbAss and the export of DsbA itself are quite sensitive to even the slight inhibition of SecA. These results suggest that SecA may be essential for both the slow posttranslational pathway and the SRP-dependent cotranslational pathway. Finally, probably because of its rapid folding in the cytoplasm, thioredoxin provides, along with gene fusion approaches, a sensitive assay system for signal sequences that utilize the SRP pathway.     

Signal sequence non-optimal codons are required for the correct folding of mature maltose binding protein

Non-optimal codons are generally characterised by a low concentration of isoaccepting tRNA and a slower translation rate compared to optimal codons. In a previous study, we reported a 20-fold reduction in maltose binding protein (MBP) level when the non-optimal codons in the signal sequence were optimised. In this study, we report that the 20-fold reduction is rescued when MBP is expressed at 28 °C instead of 37 °C, suggesting that the signal sequence optimised MBP protein (MBP-opt) may be misfolded, and is being degraded at 37 °C. Consistent with this idea, transient induction of the heat shock proteases prior to MBP expression at 28 °C restores the 20-fold difference, demonstrating that the difference in production levels is due to post-translational degradation of MBP-opt by the heat-shock proteases. Analysis of the structure of purified MBP-wt and MBP-opt grown at 28 °C showed that although they have similar secondary structure content, MBP-opt is more resistant to thermal unfolding than is MBP-wt. The two proteins also exhibit different tryptic fragment profiles, further confirming that they are folded into conformationally different states. This is the first study to demonstrate that signal sequence non-optimal codons can influence the folding of the mature exported protein.     

The mature portion of Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein (MBP) determines the dependence of MBP on SecB for export.

The product of the secB gene is required for export of a subset of secreted proteins to the outer membrane and periplasm of Escherichia coli. Precursor maltose-binding protein (MBP) accumulates in the cytoplasm of secB-carrying mutants, but export of alkaline phosphatase is only minimally affected by secB mutations. When export of MBP-alkaline phosphatase hybrid proteins was analyzed in wild-type and secB-carrying mutant strains, the first third of mature MBP was sufficient to render export of the hybrid proteins dependent on SecB. Substitution of a signal sequence from a SecB-independent protein had no effect on SecB-dependent export. These findings show that the first third of mature MBP is capable of conferring export incompetence on an otherwise competent protein.     

Recognition of secretory proteins in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis> requires signals in addition to the signal sequence and slow folding

Background  

The Sec-dependent protein export apparatus of Escherichia coli is very efficient at correctly identifying proteins to be exported from the cytoplasm. Even bacterial strains that carry prl mutations, which allow export of signal sequence-defective precursors, accurately differentiate between cytoplasmic and mutant secretory proteins. It was proposed previously that the basis for this precise discrimination is the slow folding rate of secretory proteins, resulting in binding by the secretory chaperone, SecB, and subsequent targeting to translocase. Based on this proposal, we hypothesized that a cytoplasmic protein containing a mutation that slows its rate of folding would be recognized by SecB and therefore targeted to the Sec pathway. In a Prl suppressor strain the mutant protein would be exported to the periplasm due to loss of ability to reject non-secretory proteins from the pathway.     

Identification of a Post-targeting Step Required for Efficient Cotranslational Translocation of Proteins across the Escherichia coli Inner Membrane

Recent studies have shown that cytoplasmic proteins are exported efficiently in Escherichia coli only if they are attached to signal peptides that are recognized by the signal recognition particle and are thereby targeted to the SecYEG complex cotranslationally. The evidence suggests that the entry of these proteins into the secretory pathway at an early stage of translation is necessary to prevent them from folding into a translocation-incompetent conformation. We found, however, that several glycolytic enzymes attached to signal peptides that are recognized by the signal recognition particle were exported inefficiently. Based on previous studies of post-translational export, we hypothesized that the export block was due to the presence of basic residues at the extreme N terminus of each enzyme. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that the introduction of negatively charged residues into this segment increased the efficiency of export. Export efficiency was sensitive to the number, position, and sequence context of charged residues. The importance of charge for efficient export was underscored by an in silico analysis that revealed a conserved negative charge bias at the N terminus of the mature region of bacterial presecretory proteins. Our results demonstrate that cotranslational targeting of a protein to the E. coli SecYEG complex does not ensure its export but that export also depends on a subsequent event (most likely the initiation of translocation) that involves sequences both within and just beyond the signal peptide.Since the “signal hypothesis” was proposed over 30 years ago (1), it has become clear that signal sequences are not simply generic hydrophobic peptides that earmark proteins for secretion. In bacteria, the features of a signal peptide determine the mechanism by which a given presecretory protein is targeted to the SecYEG translocation complex in the inner membrane (IM).² Whereas most or all signal peptides are recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP) in mammalian cells, only a small fraction of Escherichia coli signal peptides are recognized by SRP. These signal peptides are typically extremely hydrophobic (2, 3), but SRP apparently can also recognize slightly less hydrophobic signal peptides that contain a highly basic N terminus (4). SRP recognizes signal peptides as they emerge from translating ribosomes and then targets ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the IM cotranslationally (5). The binding of SRP to its receptor (FtsY), which interacts with the SecYEG complex (6), leads to the release of the nascent chain in the immediate vicinity of the translocation machinery. By targeting nascent polypeptides to the SecYEG complex at an early stage of translation, SRP prevents its substrates from folding into a conformation that is incompatible with translocation through the narrow channel formed by the SecYEG complex (7). Because most signal peptides are not recognized by E. coli SRP, the majority of presecretory proteins are fully synthesized and targeted post-translationally to the IM. These proteins are maintained in a translocation-competent conformation by molecular chaperones such as SecB that keep them unfolded (or loosely folded) (8). Signal peptides themselves also appear to play a role in maintaining translocation competence (9, 10). After mediating the targeting reaction, signal peptides likely play a role in gating open the SecYEG complex to initiate translocation.Interestingly, although signal sequences are the most salient feature of presecretory proteins, they are neither completely necessary nor sufficient to mediate protein export in E. coli (11–13). A version of alkaline phosphatase that lacks a signal peptide is still exported, albeit very inefficiently (11). The export of the leaderless protein, unlike the export of wild-type alkaline phosphatase, is strictly dependent on SecB (11). Conversely, the attachment of signal peptides to cytoplasmic proteins often does not promote their export (14). In light of evidence that folding and export are competing events, these observations led to the proposal that exported proteins tend to fold slowly (or are prevented from folding by chaperones) and therefore remain translocation-competent even without a signal peptide, whereas cytoplasmic proteins fold rapidly into a conformation that is incompatible with export. Recent studies that used thioredoxin as a model protein have validated this hypothesis. Whereas the wild-type protein attached to a typical signal peptide remained trapped in the cytoplasm, four of five slow folding mutants were exported efficiently (15). Furthermore, attachment of a signal peptide that is recognized by SRP to thioredoxin led to efficient export (16). This idea was further confirmed by a report in which various DARPins (designed ankyrin Repeat proteins) were attached to different signal peptides. Most of the DARPins were exported efficiently when they were fused to signal peptides that mediate cotranslational targeting but remained in the cytoplasm when they were attached to signal peptides that are bypassed by SRP (17).Despite these observations, there are several lines of evidence suggesting that export efficiency is not simply dictated by the ability of a protein to reach the SecYEG complex before folding into a translocation-incompetent conformation. For reasons that are unclear, some DARPins are secreted inefficiently even when they are routed into the SRP pathway (17). In addition, numerous reports have indicated that the amino acid composition of the segment of post-translationally targeted presecretory proteins that lies just beyond the signal peptide cleavage site has a dramatic effect on export efficiency. Statistical analysis has shown that the first ∼5–15 residues of the mature region of most presecretory proteins produced by Gram-negative bacteria is neutral or has a net negative charge (18). Consistent with the observed sequence bias, the presence of multiple basic residues at the N terminus of the mature region often leads to accumulation of the secretory precursor, whereas conversion of the basic residues to acidic residues restores export (19–22). Because different combinations of proteins and signal peptides were used in these studies, the exact number and location of charged residues that impinge on the efficiency of export is unclear. In any case, the effect of the net charge in the region distal to the signal peptide on protein export has never been explained. Although basic residues might conceivably promote premature folding of presecretory proteins or block the cleavage of signal peptides by leader peptidase, it is also possible that they inhibit an uncharacterized post-targeting event. Even if effects on signal peptide cleavage could have been ruled out in the aforementioned studies, however, it would not have been possible to distinguish between effects on protein folding and effects on a hypothetical post-targeting step because only proteins that are targeted post-translationally were monitored.To gain further insight into the factors that govern the efficiency of protein export, we sought an explanation for the observation that the cotranslational targeting of at least some cytoplasmic proteins is insufficient to guarantee their translocation across the IM. We found that the export of several different endogenous E. coli cytoplasmic proteins required not only the attachment of a signal peptide that is recognized by SRP but also a net negative charge just past the signal peptide cleavage site. Taken together with previous results, our data show that the charge of the segment just beyond the signal peptide influences export efficiency irrespective of the mechanism by which a protein is targeted to the IM. Because proteins that are targeted cotranslationally reach the IM before they have a chance to fold, our results imply the existence of a post-targeting step (most likely the initiation of translocation) that is facilitated by acidic residues distal to the signal peptide and inhibited or delayed by basic residues. These results help to resolve a long-standing puzzle about the influence of the mature region of presecretory proteins on protein export and have significant implications for optimizing the export of cytosolic and heterologous proteins in E. coli.     

Regions of maltose-binding protein that influence SecB-dependent and SecA-dependent export in Escherichia coli.

In Escherichia coli, the efficient export of maltose-binding protein (MBP) is dependent on the chaperone SecB, whereas export of ribose-binding protein (RBP) is SecB independent. To localize the regions of MBP involved in interaction with SecB, hybrids between MBP and RBP in SecB mutant cells were constructed and analyzed. One hybrid consisted of the signal peptide and first third of the mature moiety of MBP, followed by the C-terminal two-thirds of RBP (MBP-RBP112). This hybrid was dependent upon SecB for its efficient export and exhibited a strong export defect in secA mutant cells. A hybrid between RBP and MBP with the same fusion point was also constructed (RBP-MBP116). The RBP-MBP116 hybrid remained SecB independent and only exhibited a partial export defect in secA mutant cells. In addition, MBP species with specific alterations in the early mature region were less dependent on SecB for their efficient export. The export of these altered MBP species was also less affected in secA mutant cells and in cells treated with sodium azide. These results present additional evidence for the targeting role of SecB.     

The Structure of Multiple Polypeptide Domains Determines the Signal Recognition Particle Targeting Requirement of Escherichia coli Inner Membrane Proteins

The signal recognition particle (SRP) targeting pathway is required for the efficient insertion of many polytopic inner membrane proteins (IMPs) into the Escherichia coli inner membrane, but in the absence of SRP protein export proceeds normally. To define the properties of IMPs that impose SRP dependence, we analyzed the targeting requirements of bitopic IMPs that are structurally intermediate between exported proteins and polytopic IMPs. We found that disruption of the SRP pathway inhibited the insertion of only a subset of bitopic IMPs. Studies on a model bitopic AcrB-alkaline phosphatase fusion protein (AcrB 265-AP) showed that the SRP requirement for efficient insertion correlated with the presence of a large periplasmic domain (P1). As previously reported, perturbation of the SRP pathway also affected the insertion of a polytopic AcrB-AP fusion. Even exhaustive SRP depletion, however, failed to block the insertion of any AcrB derivative by more than 50%. Taken together, these data suggest that many proteins that are normally targeted by SRP can utilize alternative targeting pathways and that the structure of both hydrophilic and membrane-spanning domains determines the degree to which the biogenesis of a protein is SRP dependent.     

Kinetics and energetics of the translocation of maltose binding protein folding mutants

Protein translocation in Escherichia coli is mediated by the translocase that, in its minimal form, comprises a protein-conducting pore (SecYEG) and a motor protein (SecA). The SecYEG complex forms a narrow channel in the membrane that allows passage of secretory proteins (preproteins) in an unfolded state only. It has been suggested that the SecA requirement for translocation depends on the folding stability of the mature preprotein domain. Here we studied the effects of the signal sequence and SecB on the folding and translocation of folding stabilizing and destabilizing mutants of the mature maltose binding protein (MBP). Although the mutations affect the folding of the precursor form of MBP, these are drastically overruled by the combined unfolding stabilization of the signal sequence and SecB. Consequently, the translocation kinetics, the energetics and the SecA and SecB dependence of the folding mutants are indistinguishable from those of wild-type preMBP. These data indicate that unfolding of the mature domain of preMBP is likely not a rate-determining step in translocation when the protein is targeted to the translocase via SecB.     

Biogenesis of outer membrane protein PhoE of Escherichia coli. Evidence for multiple SecB-binding sites in the mature portion of the PhoE protein.

Efficient in vivo translocation of the precursor of Escherichia coli outer membrane protein PhoE across the inner membrane is shown to depend on SecB protein. A set of mutants, carrying internal deletions in the phoE gene, was used to locate a possible SecB-binding site and/or a site that makes the protein dependent on SecB for export. Except for two small mutant PhoE proteins, the in vivo and in vitro translocation of all mutant proteins was more efficient in the presence of SecB. The interaction of SecB protein with wild-type and mutant PhoE proteins, synthesized in vitro, was further studied in co-immunoprecipitation experiments with anti-SecB protein serum. The efficiencies of co-immunoprecipitation of precursor and mature PhoE were very similar, indicating the absence of a SecB-binding site in the signal sequence. Moreover, all mutant proteins with deletions in the mature moiety of the PhoE protein were co-immunoprecipitated in these assays, albeit mostly with reduced efficiency. Taken together, these results indicate the existence of multiple SecB-binding sites in the mature portion of the PhoE protein.     

Defective translocation of a signal sequence mutant in a prlA4 suppressor strain of Escherichia coli.

In the accompanying paper [Adams, H., Scotti, P.A., de Cock, H., Luirink, J. & Tommassen, J. (2002) Eur. J. Biochem.269, 5564-5571], we showed that the precursor of outer-membrane protein PhoE of Escherichia coli with a Gly to Leu substitution at position -10 in the signal sequence (G-10L) is targeted to the SecYEG translocon via the signal-recognition particle (SRP) route, instead of via the SecB pathway. Here, we studied the fate of the mutant precursor in a prlA4 mutant strain. prlA mutations, located in the secY gene, have been isolated as suppressors that restore the export of precursors with defective signal sequences. Remarkably, the G-10L mutant precursor, which is normally exported in a wild-type strain, accumulated strongly in a prlA4 mutant strain. In vitro cross-linking experiments revealed that the precursor is correctly targeted to the prlA4 mutant translocon. However, translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane was defective, as appeared from proteinase K-accessibility experiments in pulse-labeled cells. Furthermore, the mutant precursor was found to accumulate when expressed in a secY40 mutant, which is defective in the insertion of integral-membrane proteins but not in protein translocation. Together, these data suggest that SecB and SRP substrates are differently processed at the SecYEG translocon.