Synthesis and evaluation of γ-lactam analogs of PGE₂ as EP4 and EP2/EP4 agonists

To identify topically effective EP4 agonists and EP2/EP4 dual agonists with excellent subtype selectivity, further optimization of the 16-phenyl ω-chain moiety of the γ-lactam 5-thia prostaglandin E analog and the 2-mercaptothiazole-4-carboxylic acid analog were undertaken. Rat in vivo evaluation of these newly identified compounds as their poly (lactide-co-glycolide) microsphere formulation, from which sustained release of the test compound is possible, led us to discover compounds that showed efficacy in a rat bone fracture healing model after its topical administration without serious influence on blood pressure and heart rate. A structure-activity relationship study is also presented.     

Prostaglandin E2 Stimulates the Production of Amyloid-�� Peptides through Internalization of the EP4 Receptor

Amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides, generated by the proteolysis of β-amyloid precursor protein by β- and γ-secretases, play an important role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease. Inflammation is also important. We recently reported that prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂), a strong inducer of inflammation, stimulates the production of Aβ through EP₂ and EP₄ receptors, and here we have examined the molecular mechanism. Activation of EP₂ and EP₄ receptors is coupled to an increase in cellular cAMP levels and activation of protein kinase A (PKA). We found that inhibitors of adenylate cyclase and PKA suppress EP₂, but not EP₄, receptor-mediated stimulation of the Aβ production. In contrast, inhibitors of endocytosis suppressed EP₄, but not EP₂, receptor-mediated stimulation. Activation of γ-secretase was observed with the activation of EP₄ receptors but not EP₂ receptors. PGE₂-dependent internalization of the EP₄ receptor was observed, and cells expressing a mutant EP₄ receptor lacking the internalization activity did not exhibit PGE₂-stimulated production of Aβ. A physical interaction between the EP₄ receptor and PS-1, a catalytic subunit of γ-secretases, was revealed by immunoprecipitation assays. PGE₂-induced internalization of PS-1 and co-localization of EP₄, PS-1, and Rab7 (a marker of late endosomes and lysosomes) was observed. Co-localization of PS-1 and Rab7 was also observed in the brain of wild-type mice but not of EP₄ receptor null mice. These results suggest that PGE₂-stimulated production of Aβ involves EP₄ receptor-mediated endocytosis of PS-1 followed by activation of the γ-secretase, as well as EP₂ receptor-dependent activation of adenylate cyclase and PKA, both of which are important in the inflammation-mediated progression of Alzheimer disease.Alzheimer disease (AD)² is the most common neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system and the leading cause of adult onset dementia. AD is characterized pathologically by the accumulation of tangles and senile plaques. Senile plaques are composed of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides Aβ40 and Aβ42 (1, 2). To generate Aβ, β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) is first cleaved by β-secretase and then by γ-secretase. Cleavage of APP by α-secretase produces non-amyloidogenic peptides (3, 4). The γ-secretase is an aspartyl protease complex composed of four core components, including presenilin (PS) 1 and PS2 (5). Early onset familial AD is linked to three genes, APP, PS1, and PS2 (5, 6), strongly suggesting that γ-secretase-dependent production of Aβ is a key factor in the pathogenesis of AD. Therefore, cellular factors that affect the γ-secretase-dependent production of Aβ may be good targets for the development of drugs to prevent and treat AD.Both APP and PS-1 are transmembrane proteins, and their intracellular localization is controlled by secretory and endocytic pathways. These proteins are modified in the endoplasmic reticulum and trafficked to the cell surface through the trans-Golgi network (TGN). Then, they are internalized again and trafficked to early endosomes. Next, they are trafficked to late endosomes and lysosomes (LEL), which are recycling endosomes that are targeted to the cell surface or the TGN (7–11). The production of Aβ seems to occur in a broad range of cellular compartments including the cell surface, TGN, and endosomes (12). Abnormalities of secretory and endocytic pathways have been observed in the brains of AD patients (9, 13). Importantly, factors that control these vesicle transport systems affect the production of Aβ. For example, overproduction of Rab5, a factor essential for traffic of vesicles to early endosomes, has been shown to stimulate the production of Aβ (14), and SorL1 has been shown to reduce the production of Aβ by stimulating the traffic of APP in early endosomes to the TGN (15, 16).It has been suggested that inflammation is important in the pathogenesis of AD; chronic inflammation has been observed in the brains of AD patients, and trauma to the brain and ischemia, both of which can activate inflammation, are major risk factors for AD (17–19). Cyclooxygenase (COX) is essential for the synthesis of prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂), a potent inducer of inflammation and has two subtypes, COX-1 and COX-2. COX-1 is expressed constitutively, whereas expression of COX-2 is induced under inflammatory conditions and is responsible for the progression of inflammation (20–22). The following evidences of the involvement of PGE₂ (and COX-2) in the progression of AD suggest that they are good targets for the development of AD drugs: (i) Elevated levels of PGE₂ and overexpression of COX-2 have been observed in the brains of AD patients (23–25); (ii) the extent of COX-2 expression correlates with the amount of Aβ and the degree of progression of AD pathogenesis (26); (iii) transgenic mice constitutively overexpressing COX-2 show aging-dependent neural apoptosis and memory dysfunction (27); (iv) prolonged use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, inhibitors of COX, delays the onset and reduces the risk of AD (28); (v) PGE₂ stimulates the production of reactive oxygen species in microglia cells, resulting in activation of β-secretase (29).We recently reported that PGE₂ stimulates the production of Aβ in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 and human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells that stably express a form of APP with two mutations (K651N/M652L) (APPsw) that elevate cellular and secreted levels of Aβ (30). Similar results were reported by another group (31). Using agonists and antagonists specific for each of the four PGE₂ receptors (EP₁, EP₂, EP₃, and EP₄), we found that EP₄ receptors alone and also both EP₂ and EP₄ receptors are involved in PGE₂-stimulated production of Aβ in HEK293 or SH-SY5Y cells, respectively (30). Furthermore, experiments with transgenic mice suggest that EP₂ and EP₄ receptors are involved in the production of Aβ in vivo (30). Based on these results, we propose that antagonists of the EP₂ and/or EP₄ receptors may be therapeutically beneficial for the treatment of AD. Understanding the mechanism governing EP₂ and EP₄ receptor-mediated stimulation of production of Aβ by PGE₂ will be important for such drug development.Activation of EP₂ and EP₄ receptors causes activation of adenylate cyclase and an increase in the cellular level of cAMP (32). We have shown that an EP₄ receptor agonist or both EP₂ and EP₄ receptor agonists increase the cellular level of cAMP in HEK293 or SH-SY5Y cells, respectively, and that a cAMP analogue, 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-cAMP (pCPT-cAMP), increases the level of Aβ in HEK293 cells (30). These findings suggest that the cellular level of cAMP is important for PGE₂-stimulated production of Aβ. An increase in the cellular level of cAMP is known to activate protein kinase A (PKA), which is important for cAMP-regulated intracellular signal transduction (33). However, an inhibitor of PKA, N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)ethyl]-5-isoquinoline-sulfonamide (H-89), does not block PGE₂-stimulated production of Aβ in HEK293 cells (30). Other cAMP-regulated signal transduction factors, such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Epac (exchange protein directly activated by cAMP), were also shown not to be involved in PGE₂-stimulated production of Aβ in HEK293 cells (30). Thus, the mechanism whereby the activation of EP₂ and EP₄ receptors stimulates the production of Aβ has remained unknown. In this study, by using inhibitors of adenylate cyclase and PKA, we found that activation of the EP₂ receptor stimulates production of Aβ through activation of adenylate cyclase and PKA. We also propose that activation of the EP₄ receptor causes its co-internalization with PS-1 (γ-secretase) into endosomes and that this co-internalization is important for EP₄ receptor-mediated stimulation of Aβ production by PGE₂ through the activation of γ-secretase.     

In vivo intra-luteal implants of prostaglandin (PG) E1 or E2 (PGE1, PGE2) prevent luteolysis in cows. II: mRNA for PGF2α, EP1, EP2, EP3 (A-D), EP3A, EP3B, EP3C, EP3D, and EP4 prostanoid receptors in luteal tissue

Previously, it was reported that chronic intra-uterine infusion of PGE(1) or PGE(2) every 4h inhibited luteolysis in ewes by altering luteal mRNA for luteinizing hormone (LH) receptors and unoccupied and occupied luteal LH receptors. However, estradiol-17β or PGE(2) given intra-uterine every 8h did not inhibit luteolysis in cows, but infusion of estradiol+PGE(2) inhibited luteolysis. In contrast, intra-luteal implants containing PGE(1) or PGE(2) in Angus or Brahman cows also inhibited the decline in circulating progesterone, mRNA for LH receptors, and loss of unoccupied and occupied receptors for LH to prevent luteolysis. The objective of this experiment was to determine how intra-luteal implants of PGE(1) or PGE(2) alter mRNA for prostanoid receptors and how this could influence luteolysis in Brahman or Angus cows. On day-13 Angus cows received no intra-luteal implant and corpora lutea were retrieved or Angus and Brahman cows received intra-luteal silastic implants containing Vehicle, PGE(1), or PGE(2) and corpora lutea were retrieved on day-19. Corpora lutea slices were analyzed for mRNA for prostanoid receptors (FP, EP1, EP2, EP3 (A-D), EP3A, EP3B, EP3C, EP3D, and EP4) by RT-PCR. Day-13 Angus cow luteal tissue served as pre-luteolytic controls. mRNA for FP receptors decreased in day-19 Vehicle controls compared to day-13 Vehicle controls regardless of breed. PGE(1) and PGE(2) up-regulated FP gene expression on day-19 compared to day-19 Vehicle controls regardless of breed. EP1 mRNA was not altered by any treatment. PGE(1) and PGE(2) down-regulated EP2 and EP4 mRNA compared to day-19 Vehicle controls regardless of breed. PGE(1) or PGE(2) up-regulated mRNA EP3B receptor subtype compared to day-19 Vehicle control cows regardless of breed. The similarities in relative gene expression profiles induced by PGE(1) and PGE(2) support their agonistic effects. We conclude that both PGE(1) and PGE(2) may prevent luteolysis by altering expression of mRNA for prostanoid receptors, which is correlated with changes in luteal mRNA for LH receptors reported previously in these same cows to prevent luteolysis.     

Matrix metalloproteinase-dependent microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 expression in macrophages: role of TNF-α and the EP4 prostanoid receptor

Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 contributes to the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer. Thus, identifying targetable components of signaling pathways that regulate MMP-9 expression may have broad therapeutic implications. Our previous studies revealed a nexus between metalloproteinases and prostanoids whereby MMP-1 and MMP-3, commonly found in inflammatory and neoplastic foci, stimulate macrophage MMP-9 expression via the release of TNF-α and subsequent induction of cyclooxygenase-2 and PGE(2) engagement of EP4 receptor. In the current study, we determined whether MMP-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression was coupled to the expression of prostaglandin E synthase family members. We found that MMP-1- and MMP-3-dependent release of TNF-α induced rapid and transient expression of early growth response protein 1 in macrophages followed by sustained elevation in microsomal prostaglandin synthase 1 (mPGES-1) expression. Metalloproteinase-induced PGE(2) levels and MMP-9 expression were markedly attenuated in macrophages in which mPGES-1 was silenced, thereby identifying mPGES-1 as a therapeutic target in the regulation of MMP-9 expression. Finally, the induction of mPGES-1 was regulated, in part, through a positive feedback loop dependent on PGE(2) binding to EP4. Thus, in addition to inhibiting macrophage MMP-9 expression, EP4 antagonists emerge as potential therapy to reduce mPGES-1 expression and PGE(2) levels in inflammatory and neoplastic settings.     

Synthesis and evaluation of novel modified γ-lactam prostanoids as EP4 subtype-selective agonists

To identify chemically and metabolically stable subtype-selective EP4 agonists, design and synthesis of a series of modified γ-lactam prostanoids has been continued. Prostanoids bearing 2-oxo-1,3-oxazolidine, 2-oxo-1,3-thiazolidine and 5-thioxopyrrolidine as a surrogate for the γ-hydroxycyclopentanone without a troublesome 11-hydroxy group were identified as highly subtype-selective EP4 agonists. Among the tested, several representative compounds demonstrated in vivo efficacy after oral dosing in rats. Their pharmacokinetic and structure-activity relationship studies are presented.     

Identification of Integrin α3 as a New Substrate of the Adenovirus E4orf6/E1B 55-Kilodalton E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Complex

The human adenovirus E4orf6 and E1B55K proteins promote viral replication by targeting several cellular proteins for degradation. The E4orf6 product has been shown by our group and others to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that contains elongins B and C and cullin family member Cul5. E1B55K associates with this complex, where it is believed to function primarily to introduce bound substrates for degradation via proteasomes. In addition to p53, its first known substrate, the E4orf6/E1B 55-kDa complex (E4orf6/E1B55K) was shown to promote the degradation of Mre11 and DNA ligase IV; however, additional substrates are believed to exist. This notion is strengthened by the fact that none of these substrates seems likely to be associated with additional functions shown to be mediated by the E4orf6-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, including export of late viral mRNAs and blockage of export of the bulk cellular mRNAs from the nucleus. In an attempt to identify new E4orf6/E1B55K substrates, we undertook a proteomic screen using human p53-null, non-small-cell lung carcinoma H1299 cells expressing either E4orf6 protein alone or in combination with E1B55K through infection by appropriate adenovirus vectors. One cellular protein that appeared to be degraded by E1B55K in combination with the E4orf6 protein was a species of molecular mass ∼130 kDa that was identified as the integrin α3 subunit (i.e., very late activation antigen 3 alpha subunit). Preliminary analyses suggested that degradation of α3 may play a role in promoting release and spread of progeny virions.Viruses are well known to promote replication by inhibiting or enhancing endogenous cellular machinery or, in some cases, by reprogramming key cellular pathways. Human adenoviruses have developed effective ways to modulate the immune response, apoptosis, double-strand break repair, mRNA export, and translation to optimize virus replication and the spreading of progeny virions. The expression of adenovirus E1A proteins stabilizes p53 and induces apoptosis (8, 33); however, this effect is reversed in infected cells by the action of two early products: the E1B 55-kDa (E1B55K) and E4orf6 proteins (35, 36). We and others have shown that these proteins act through the formation of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex analogous to the SCF and VBC complexes but which contains, in addition to elongins B and C and the RING protein Rbx1, the cullin family member Cul5 (18, 41, 43). This E4orf6-mediated E3 ligase complex blocks p53-induced apoptosis (35, 36) by promoting the ubiquitination of p53, followed by its degradation by proteasomes (41, 43). E4orf6 protein mediates the assembly of the complex by its interaction with elongin C through its three BC boxes (11, 41, 43). E1B55K, which appears to associate with the E4orf6 protein only when present in the ligase complex (4), is thought to function as a substrate recognition factor that brings substrates to the complex because, although both E4orf6 and E1B55K bind p53 independently, interaction of E1B55K with p53 is essential for the efficient degradation of p53 (41, 48). In addition to protecting infected cells from early lysis via p53-induced apoptosis, the E4orf6/E1B55K ligase complex performs other functions essential for virus replication. Two other substrates of the complex have been identified: a member of the MRN DNA repair complex, Mre11, and the central component of the nonhomologous end-joining DNA repair system, DNA ligase IV (2, 56). Degradation of both of these proteins prevents viral genome concatenation, which interferes with the packaging of viral DNA into virions (2, 56). E1B55K binds to p53, Mre11, and DNA ligase IV and has been demonstrated to colocalize with p53 and Mre11 in perinuclear cytoplasmic bodies termed aggresomes (1, 2, 32). More recently, we and others have obtained results that suggest that the E4orf6-associated E3 ligase complex regulates viral and cellular mRNA export (5, 66). The Cul5-based ligase activity was shown to be essential for selective viral mRNA export and the block of cellular mRNA export from the nucleus (66), thus contributing to the shutoff of cellular protein synthesis initiated by L4-100K (20). The actual substrates of the complex responsible for regulating mRNA export are currently unknown.As discussed in detail below, our efforts to identify substrates of the E4orf6/E1B55K complex led us to consider a member of the integrin family as a potential substrate. Integrins are members of a family of surface receptors that function in several ways through the formation of cell-extracellular matrices and cell-cell interactions (reviewed in references 21, 26, and 63). Integrins are typically composed of two transmembrane glycoproteins forming heterodimers of α and β subunits each of approximately 80 to 150 kDa. There are at least 18 α subunits and 8 β subunits in mammals that can dimerize in limited combinations to form more than 20 functionally distinct integrins with different ligand specificities. Integrin heterodimers function as transmembrane receptors that link external factors to intracellular signaling pathways. In addition to roles in cell adhesion, these communication events are implicated in a large range of cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, translation, migration, and apoptosis. Some of these processes depend on the intracellular trafficking pathways of the integrins (reviewed in references 9, 24, 40, and 44), including the long-loop recycling pathway in which integrins present in clathrin-coated endosomes move first to the perinuclear recycling center, where some accumulate, including the β1 integrin subunit (31), before returning to the plasma membrane. The integrin α3β1 is a member of the β1 integrin subfamily in which the α3 subunit (VLA-3a) is coupled to the β1 subunit to form the very late activation antigen (VLA-3 or CD49c) (21, 59, 60). α3β1 is expressed in a wide range of tissues in which it binds a variety of extracellular matrix substrates, including fibronectin, collagen, thrombospondin 1, and laminins 1, 5, 8, 10, and 11 (13). These associations allow the integrin α3β1 to fill its primary role in cell adhesion. α3β1 also participates in intercellular adhesion through several protein-protein interactions (10, 27, 53, 55, 58), making it a major contributor in the regulation of cellular adhesion.Human adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) particles interact with cell surface receptors to facilitate internalization into target cells. In the high-affinity interacting model (reviewed in reference 29), the viral fiber knob polypeptide binds the coxsackie adenovirus receptor (CAR) protein on the surface of cells as the primary cell binding event (primary receptor). The penton base polypeptide then binds a cell surface integrin (secondary receptor), leading to entry of the capsid into the cell by a process termed receptor-mediated endocytosis or clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Several types of integrins have been identified as being used by Ad5 to mediate virus internalization: αMβ1, αMβ2, αVβ1, αVβ3, αVβ5, and α5β1 (22, 30, 49, 65). Salone et al. have shown that α3β1 serves as an alternative cellular receptor for adenovirus serotype 5 (49). It promotes entry of the virus into cells, transduction of DNA, and mediates adenovirus infection in both CAR-positive and CAR-negative cell lines. Thus, in addition to functions related to cell adhesion, integrin α3β1 plays an important role in the adenovirus infection cycle.To identify new targets for degradation by the E4orf6/E1B55K ubiquitin ligase, we used a proteomic screen covering most cellular proteins to look for any polypeptide that exhibited a significant decrease in amount following the coexpression from appropriate adenovirus vectors of the E4orf6 protein and E1B55K. This screen revealed several interesting candidates, including integrin α3, a species of 130 kDa that also was found to be reduced in wild-type (wt) virus infection. The degradation of α3 was seen to be dependent on the Cul5-based ligase complex driven by E4orf6 and E1B55K. We also found evidence that the E4orf6/E1B55K ligase complex appears to be involved in cell detachment from the extracellular matrix, a function that could play a role in virus spread.     

Mnk mediates integrin α6β4-dependent eIF4E phosphorylation and translation of VEGF mRNA

It was previously shown that integrin α6β4 contributes to translation of cancer-related mRNAs such as VEGF via initiation factor eIF4E. In this study, we found that integrin α6β4 regulates the activity of eIF4E through the Ser/Thr kinase Mnk. Although a role for Mnk in various aspects of cancer progression has been established, a link between integrin and Mnk activity has not. Here we show that Mnk1 is a downstream effector of integrin α6β4 and mediates the α6β4 signaling, important for translational control. Integrin α6β4 signals through MEK and p38 MAPK to increase phosphorylation of Mnk1 and eIF4E. Inhibition of Mnk1 activity by CGP57380 or downregulation by shRNA blocks α6β4-dependent translation of VEGF mRNA. Our studies suggest that Mnk1 could be a therapeutic target in cancers where the integrin α6β4 level is high.     

前列腺素E_2受体EP4与脂肪生成及代谢

脂肪是身体的储能器官,能量以脂滴的形式储存在脂肪细胞中,脂肪组织的功能稳态是机体维持正常代谢活动的基础。前列腺素E_2 (prostaglandin E_2, PGE_2)是体内重要的脂质活性分子,广泛表达于机体组织中,参与血压、糖脂代谢、炎症等众多生理过程的调节。大量证据表明PGE_2合成酶及其受体在白色脂肪组织中大量表达,提示PGE_2参与脂肪代谢的调节。PGE_2发挥生物学功能,需要通过其G蛋白耦联受体EP1～4介导,其中EP4受体亚型在脂肪生成及代谢中发挥了重要作用,EP4受体的激活可以抑制前脂肪细胞的分化,EP4受体的缺失促进脂质分解。本文将综述EP4受体与脂肪发生及代谢的关系,并提出EP4受体有可能成为肥胖及相关代谢疾病新的治疗靶点。     

eIF4E作用及调节机制

eIF4E作为翻译启动因子复合体eIF4-F的关键部分,调节细胞的蛋白质合成的限速步骤,ras基因加强eIF4E的磷酸化,c-myc基因增加eIF4E mRNA水平,eIF4E活性随其本身磷酸化的加强而加强,随其结合蛋白的磷酸化加强而减弱。eIF4E是新近发现的原癌,这量的eIF4E选择性地加强原癌基因等“弱mRNA”的翻译：可以通过加强蛋白质合成的速度,也可以加速mRNA由细胞核由胞浆转移。     

腺病毒E4启动子结合蛋白-4(E4BP4)基因在小鼠胚胎着床期间子宫组织中的表达

腺病毒E4启动子结合蛋白-4(E4BP4)是哺乳动物细胞核内的一种碱性亮氨酸拉链(bZIP)型转录因子,参与调控细胞的存活和增殖。前期研究表明,它在孕第5天的小鼠着床位点有明显的高表达。本文分别应用Northem blot、in situ杂交、Western blot和免疫组织化学技术,对E4BP4基因在小鼠妊娠初始期子宫、着床期胚胎着床位点和非着床位点的表达情况进行了研究。观察发现：在小鼠妊娠初始期,E4BP4基因在子宫组织中的表达逐步上调;至胚胎着床期间,其在胚胎着床位点的表达水平进一步提高,并明显高于非着床位点;该基因的表达不依赖于胚胎,人工蜕膜化可诱导其表达：E4BP4 mRNA和E4BP4蛋白分子都主要分布于子宫腔周围的基质细胞和蜕膜细胞。上述结果提示E4BP4基因可能通过促进着床位点基质细胞的增殖和抑制蜕膜细胞的凋亡而参与胚胎着床过程的调控。     

Regulation of PTEN degradation and NEDD4–1 E3 ligase activity by Numb

The critical tumor suppressor PTEN is regulated by numerous post-translational modifications including phosphorylation, acetylation and ubiquitination. Ubiquitination of PTEN was reported to control both PTEN stability and nuclear localization. Notably, the HECT E3-ligase NEDD4–1 was identified as the ubiquitin ligase for PTEN, mediating its degradation and down-stream events. However, the mechanisms how NEDD4–1 is regulated by up-stream signaling pathways or interaction with other proteins in promoting PTEN degradation remain largely unclear. In the present study, we identified that the adaptor protein Numb, which is demonstrated to be a novel binding partner of NEDD4–1, plays important roles in controlling PTEN ubiquitination through regulating NEDD4–1 activity and the association between PTEN and NEDD4–1. Furthermore, we provided data to show that Numb regulates cell proliferation and glucose metabolism in a PTEN-dependent manner. Overall, our study revealed a novel regulation of the well-documented NEDD4–1/PTEN pathway and its oncogenic behavior.     

Metabolism of (2Z,4E)-γ-Ionylideneethanol and (2Z,4E)-γ-Ionylideneacetic Acid in Cercospora cruenta

[2–¹⁴C]-(2Z,4E)-γ-Ionylideneethanol and [2–¹⁴C]-(2Z,4E)-γ-ionylideneacetic acid were converted by Cercospora cruenta to [2–¹⁴C]-(2Z,4E)-1′,4′-dihydroxy-γ-ionylideneacetic acid and [2-¹⁴C]-(2Z,4E)-4′-hydroxy-γ-ionylideneacetic acid, which are intermediates of ABA biosynthesis in C. cruenta.     

EP4 Receptor–Associated Protein in Macrophages Ameliorates Colitis and Colitis-Associated Tumorigenesis

Prostaglandin E₂ plays important roles in the maintenance of colonic homeostasis. The recently identified prostaglandin E receptor (EP) 4–associated protein (EPRAP) is essential for an anti-inflammatory function of EP4 signaling in macrophages in vitro. To investigate the in vivo roles of EPRAP, we examined the effects of EPRAP on colitis and colitis-associated tumorigenesis. In mice, EPRAP deficiency exacerbated colitis induced by dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) treatment. Wild-type (WT) or EPRAP-deficient recipients transplanted with EPRAP-deficient bone marrow developed more severe DSS-induced colitis than WT or EPRAP-deficient recipients of WT bone marrow. In the context of colitis-associated tumorigenesis, both systemic EPRAP null mutation and EPRAP-deficiency in the bone marrow enhanced intestinal polyp formation induced by azoxymethane (AOM)/DSS treatment. Administration of an EP4-selective agonist, ONO-AE1-329, ameliorated DSS-induced colitis in WT, but not in EPRAP-deficient mice. EPRAP deficiency increased the levels of the phosphorylated forms of p105, MEK, and ERK, resulting in activation of stromal macrophages in DSS-induced colitis. Macrophages of DSS-treated EPRAP-deficient mice exhibited a marked increase in the expression of pro-inflammatory genes, relative to WT mice. By contrast, forced expression of EPRAP in macrophages ameliorated DSS-induced colitis and AOM/DSS-induced intestinal polyp formation. These data suggest that EPRAP in macrophages functions crucially in suppressing colonic inflammation. Consistently, EPRAP-positive macrophages were also accumulated in the colonic stroma of ulcerative colitis patients. Thus, EPRAP may be a potential therapeutic target for inflammatory bowel disease and associated intestinal tumorigenesis.     

硬粒小麦 长穗偃麦草2E和4E附加系及E染色体传递

为探讨长穗偃麦草E染色体在硬粒小麦背景中的传递特点,利用染色体特异分子标记、基因组原位杂交(GISH)、非变性荧光原位杂交(ND FISH)等方法,对小偃麦8801(AABBEE)与硬粒小麦(AABB)杂交后代中选育的株系Du_No.2和Du_No.4进行了分析。结果表明：(1)分子标记检测株系Du_No.2及Du_No.4分别能扩增出长穗偃麦草2E、4E染色体特异条带。(2)GISH和ND FISH分析显示,株系Du_No.2和Du_No.4分别附加了1条2E和4E染色体,表明株系Du_No.2 和Du_No.4分别为硬粒小麦 长穗偃麦草2E和4E单体附加系。(3)2个株系的减数分裂过程观察发现,后期Ⅰ、Ⅱ和末期Ⅱ都有E染色体分离异常现象,且株系Du_No.2和 Du_No.4的异常率分别为22.24%和36.18%。(4)2个株系分别与硬粒小麦进行正反杂交的后代PCR分析表明, 2E和4E染色体经雄配子的传递率分别为4.41%和2.17%,而通过雌配子的传递率都为零,表明2E和4E染色体在硬粒小麦背景中能通过雄配子传递,但不通过雌配子的传递。该研究为创建全套硬粒小麦 长穗偃麦草双体附加系及代换系提供基础。     

Nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions in restoration of male fertility in the ‘9E’ and A4 CMS-inducing cytoplasms of sorghum

 The genetics of male-fertility restoration in sorghum in the “9E” and A4 CMS-inducing cytoplasms, was studied by crossing a number of fertility restorer lines of A1 cytoplasm to CMS lines [9E]T×398 and [A4]T×398 and the line [9E]Milo-10, which was obtained by backcrossing Milo-10 to [9E]T×398. It was revealed that both A4 and “9E” cytoplasms are characterized by a sporophytic mode of restoration of male fertility. Depending on the nuclear background of the male parents, fertility restoration was controlled by one or two dominant genes. Fertility-restorer genes of one of the tester lines, KVV-114, were effective in [9E]T×398 but could not restore [9E]Milo-10. A fertile line obtained from the fertile hybrid [9E]T×398/KVV-112, with “9E” cytoplasm, also failed to restore [9E]Milo-10. In a number of hybrid combinations with both A4 and “9E” cytoplasms a novel and unusual phenomenon of gradual restoration of male fertility in subsequent backcross generations was observed. Pollen from the fertile revertants did not transmit fertility restoration in progeny from crosses with the original CMS line and was poorly transmitted in sib-crosses. The appearance of fertile revertants and the different reactions of different CMS lines with the same cytoplasm in test-crosses may be caused by the action of recessive nuclear genes of the recurrent male parents that were accumulated during backcrossing; these may induce changes in cytoplasmic genes controlling CMS. Received: 5 March 1998 / Accepted: 7 April 1998     

Does phosphorylation of the cap-binding protein eIF4E play a role in translation initiation?

Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) plays an important role in mRNA translation by binding the 5'-cap structure of the mRNA and facilitating the recruitment to the mRNA of other translation factors and the 40S ribosomal subunit. eIF4E can interact either with the scaffold protein eIF4G or with repressor proteins termed eIF4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs). High levels of expression can disrupt cellular growth control and are associated with human cancers. A fraction of the cellular eIF4E is found in the nucleus where it may play a role in the transport of certain mRNAs to the cytoplasm. eIF4E undergoes regulated phosphorylation (at Ser209) by members of the Mnk group of kinases, which are activated by multiple MAP kinases (hence Mnk = MAP-kinase signal integrating kinase). The functional significance of its phosphorylation has been the subject of considerable interest. Recent genetic studies in Drosophila point to a key role for phosphorylation of eIF4E in growth and viability. Initial structural data suggested that phosphorylation of Ser209 might allow formation of a salt bridge with a basic residue (Lys159) that would clamp eIF4E onto the mRNA and increase its affinity for ligand. However, more recent structural data place Ser209 too far away from Lys159 to form such an interaction, and biophysical studies indicate that phosphorylation actually decreases the affinity of eIF4E for cap or capped RNA. The implications of these studies are discussed in the light of other, in vitro and in vivo, investigations designed to address the role of eIF4E phosphorylation in mRNA translation or its control.