Molecular mechanism of co-translational protein targeting by the signal recognition particle

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a key component of the cellular machinery that couples the ongoing synthesis of proteins to their proper localization, and has often served as a paradigm for understanding the molecular basis of protein localization within the cell. The SRP pathway exemplifies several key molecular events required for protein targeting to cellular membranes: the specific recognition of signal sequences on cargo proteins, the efficient delivery of cargo to the target membrane, the productive unloading of cargo to the translocation machinery and the precise spatial and temporal coordination of these molecular events. Here we highlight recent advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying this pathway, and discuss new questions raised by these findings.     

Co-translational protein targeting to the bacterial membrane

Co-translational protein targeting by the Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) is an essential cellular pathway that couples the synthesis of nascent proteins to their proper cellular localization. The bacterial SRP, which contains the minimal ribonucleoprotein core of this universally conserved targeting machine, has served as a paradigm for understanding the molecular basis of protein localization in all cells. In this review, we highlight recent biochemical and structural insights into the molecular mechanisms by which fundamental challenges faced by protein targeting machineries are met in the SRP pathway. Collectively, these studies elucidate how an essential SRP RNA and two regulatory GTPases in the SRP and SRP receptor (SR) enable this targeting machinery to recognize, sense and respond to its biological effectors, i.e. the cargo protein, the target membrane and the translocation machinery, thus driving efficient and faithful co-translational protein targeting. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein trafficking and secretion in bacteria. Guest Editors: Anastassios Economou and Ross Dalbey.     

信号识别颗粒(SRP)在膜蛋白定位中的作用

依赖信号识别颗粒(signal recognition particle,SRP)的共翻译转运是所有生命体中的一个保守途径,它将新生肽链的翻译与转运耦联在一起。超过30%的新合成的多肽链被SRP转运到正确位置。最近的研究表明,大肠杆菌中SRP抑制子可以规避SRP的需求。当SRP缺失时,翻译控制在介导膜蛋白定位方面起着关键作用。本综述总结了SRP底物如何在存在或缺失SRP的情况下转运到适当的位置以及翻译速率降低如何补偿SRP的缺失。我们还讨论了不同蛋白质对SRP的依赖程度。这一回顾将为进一步研究SRP功能及膜蛋白定位提供新思路。     

Synergistic actions between the SRP RNA and translating ribosome allow efficient delivery of the correct cargos during cotranslational protein targeting

During cotranslational protein targeting by the Signal Recognition Particle (SRP), the correct cargo accelerates stable complex assembly between the SRP and SRP receptor (FtsY) by several orders of magnitude, thus enabling rapid and faithful cargo delivery to the target membrane. The molecular mechanism underlying this cargo-induced rate acceleration has been unclear. Here we show that the SRP RNA allows assembly of the SRP-FtsY complex to be specifically stimulated by a correct cargo, and, reciprocally, a correct cargo enables the SRP RNA to optimize its electrostatic interactions with FtsY. These results combined with recent structural work led us to suggest a "conformational selection" model that explains the synergistic action of the SRP RNA with the cargo in accelerating complex assembly. In addition to its previously proposed role in preventing the premature dissociation of SRP and FtsY, we found that the SRP RNA also plays an active role in ensuring the formation of productive assembly intermediates, thus guiding the SRP and FtsY through the most efficient pathway of assembly.     

Signal recognition particle mediated protein targeting in Escherichia coli

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a conserved ribonucleoprotein complex that binds to targeting sequences in nascent secretory and membrane proteins. The SRP guides these proteins to the cytoplasmic membrane in prokaryotes and the endoplasmic reticulum membrane in eukaryotes via an interaction with its cognate receptor. The E. coli SRP is relatively small and is currently used as a model for fundamental and applied studies on translation-linked protein targeting. In this review recent advances in our understanding of the structure and function of the E. coli SRP and its receptor are discussed. In particular, the interplay between the SRP pathway and other targeting routes, the role of guanine nucleotides in cycling of the SRP and the substrate specificity of the SRP are highlighted     

Molecular dynamics simulations reveal structural coordination of Ffh-FtsY heterodimer toward GTPase activation

Two homologous GTPases (guanine-triphosphatases) in the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor (SR) use their cumulative energy during GTP (guanine-triphosphate) hydrolysis to control the co-translational protein targeting process. Distinct from classical GTPases, which rely on external factors to hydrolyze GTP, SRP GTPases stimulate one another's activity in a self-sufficient manner upon SRP-SR complex association. Although both ground-state and putative transition-state GTP analogs have been used to recapitulate the state of GTPase activation, the underlying mechanism of the activated state still remains elusive. In particular, several residues that were placed in pending positions have been shown to be important to GTP hydrolysis in biochemical studies. Here, we examined the stability and dynamics of three interaction networks involving these residues and discovered that they contribute to the GTPase activation via well-tuned conformational changes. The crystallographically identified pending residues Ffh:R191/FtsY:R195 undergo extensive conformational rearrangements to form persisted interactions with FtsY:E284/Ffh:E274, explaining the biochemically observed defective effect of R191 mutant to the activation of both GTPases. In addition, the side chain of FtsY:R142, one of the most important catalytic residues, rotates to an extended conformation that could more efficiently maintain the electrostatic balance for GTP hydrolysis. Finally, the invariant residues Ffh:G190 and FtsY:G194, instead of the supposed auxiliary water molecules, are proposed to stabilize the nucleophilic waters during GTPase activation. In complementary to experimental observations, these findings suggest a more favorable interaction model for SRP GTPase activation and would thus benefit to our understanding of how SRP GTPases regulate the protein targeting pathway.     

Molecular dynamics simulation of SRP GTPases: Towards an understanding of the complex formation from equilibrium fluctuations

Signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor (SR) play essential role in the SRP‐dependent protein targeting pathway. They interact with one another to precisely regulate the targeting reaction. The mechanism of this interaction consists of at least two discrete conformational states: complex formation and GTPase activation. Although structural studies have provided valuable insights into the understanding of the SRP‐SR interaction, it still remains unclear that how SRP and SR GTPases use their intrinsic conformational flexibilities to exert multiple allosteric regulations on this interaction process. Here, we use computational simulations to present the dynamic behavior of the SRP GTPases at an atomic level to gain further understanding of SRP‐SR interaction. We show that: (i) equilibrium conformational fluctuations contain a cooperative inter‐ and intradomain structural rearrangements that are functionally relevant to complex formation, (ii) a series of residues in different domains are identified to correlate with each other during conformational rearrangements, and (iii) α3 and α4 helices at domain interface actively rearrange their relative conformation to function as a bridge between the N domain and the core region of the G domain. These results, in addition to structural studies, would harness our understanding of the molecular mechanism for SRP and SR interaction. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Dual recognition of the ribosome and the signal recognition particle by the SRP receptor during protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum

We have analyzed the interactions between the signal recognition particle (SRP), the SRP receptor (SR), and the ribosome using GTPase assays, biosensor experiments, and ribosome binding assays. Possible mechanisms that could contribute to an enhanced affinity between the SR and the SRP-ribosome nascent chain complex to promote protein translocation under physiological ionic strength conditions have been explored. Ribosomes or 60S large ribosomal subunits activate the GTPase cycle of SRP54 and SRalpha by providing a platform for assembly of the SRP-SR complex. Biosensor experiments revealed high-affinity, saturable binding of ribosomes or large ribosomal subunits to the SR. Remarkably, the SR has a 100-fold higher affinity for the ribosome than for SRP. Proteoliposomes that contain the SR bind nontranslating ribosomes with an affinity comparable to that shown by the Sec61 complex. An NH2-terminal 319-residue segment of SRalpha is necessary and sufficient for binding of SR to the ribosome. We propose that the ribosome-SR interaction accelerates targeting of the ribosome nascent chain complex to the RER, while the SRP-SR interaction is crucial for maintaining the fidelity of the targeting reaction.     

Correct targeting of plant ARF GTPases relies on distinct protein domains

Indispensable membrane trafficking events depend on the activity of conserved small guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases), anchored to individual organelle membranes. In plant cells, it is currently unknown how these proteins reach their correct target membranes and interact with their effectors. To address these important biological questions, we studied two members of the ADP ribosylation factor (ARF) GTPase family, ARF1 and ARFB, which are membrane anchored through the same N-terminal myristoyl group but to different target membranes. Specifically, we investigated how ARF1 is targeted to the Golgi and post-Golgi structures, whereas ARFB accumulates at the plasma membrane. While the subcellular localization of ARFB appears to depend on multiple domains including the C-terminal half of the GTPase, the correct targeting of ARF1 is dependent on two domains: an N-terminal ARF1 domain that is necessary for the targeting of the GTPase to membranes and a core domain carrying a conserved MxxE motif that influences the relative distribution of ARF1 between the Golgi and post-Golgi compartments. We also established that the N-terminal ARF1 domain alone was insufficient to maintain an interaction with membranes and that correct targeting is a protein-specific property that depends on the status of the GTP switch. Finally, an ARF1-ARFB chimera containing only the first 18 amino acids from ARF1 was shown to compete with ARF1 membrane binding loci. Although this chimera exhibited GTPase activity in vitro, it was unable to recruit coatomer, a known ARF1 effector, onto Golgi membranes. Our results suggest that the targeting of ARF GTPases to the correct membranes may not only depend on interactions with effectors but also relies on distinct protein domains and further binding partners on the Golgi surface.     

Conformational change of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis> signal recognition particle Ffh is affected by the functionality of signal peptides of ribose-binding protein

We examined the effects of synthetic signal peptides, wild-type (WT) and export-defective mutant (MT) of ribose-binding protein, on the conformational changes of signal recognition particle 54 homologue (Ffh) in Escherichia coli. Upon interaction of Ffh with WT peptide, the intrinsic Tyr fluorescence, the transition temperature of thermal unfolding, and the GTPase activity of Ffh decreased in a peptide concentration-dependent manner, while the emission intensity of 8-anilinonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid increased. In contrast, the secondary structure of the protein was not affected. Additionally, polarization of fluorescein-labeled WT increased upon association with Ffh. These results suggest that WT peptide induces the unfolded states of Ffh. The WT-mediated conformational change of Ffh was also revealed to be important in the interaction between SecA and Ffh. However, MT had marginal effect on these conformational changes suggesting that the in vivo functionality of signal peptide is important in the interaction with Ffh and concomitant structural change of the protein.     

Widespread use of unconventional targeting signals in mitochondrial ribosome proteins

Mitochondrial ribosomes are complex molecular machines indispensable for respiration. Their assembly involves the import of several dozens of mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (MRPs), encoded in the nuclear genome, into the mitochondrial matrix. Proteomic and structural data as well as computational predictions indicate that up to 25% of yeast MRPs do not have a conventional N‐terminal mitochondrial targeting signal (MTS). We experimentally characterized a set of 15 yeast MRPs in vivo and found that five use internal MTSs. Further analysis of a conserved model MRP, Mrp17/bS6m, revealed the identity of the internal targeting signal. Similar to conventional MTS‐containing proteins, the internal sequence mediates binding to TOM complexes. The entire sequence of Mrp17 contains positive charges mediating translocation. The fact that these sequence properties could not be reliably predicted by standard methods shows that mitochondrial protein targeting is more versatile than expected. We hypothesize that structural constraints imposed by ribosome assembly interfaces may have disfavored N‐terminal presequences and driven the evolution of internal targeting signals in MRPs.     

A tale of two paralogs: human Transformer2 proteins with differential RNA-binding affinities

The Transformer2 (Tra2) proteins in humans are homologues of the Drosophila Tra2 protein. One of the two RNA-binding paralogs, Tra2β, has been very well-studied over the past decade, but not much is known about Tra2α. It was very recently shown that the two proteins demonstrate the phenomenon of paralog compensation. Here, we provide a structural basis for this genetic backup circuit, using molecular modelling and dynamics studies. We show that the two proteins display similar binding specificities, but differential affinities to a short GAA-rich RNA stretch. Starting from the 6-nucleotide RNA in the solution structure, close to 4000 virtual mutations were modelled on RNA and the domain–RNA interactions were studied after energy minimisation to convergence. Separately, another known 13-nucleotide stretch was docked and the domain–RNA interactions were observed through a 100-ns dynamics trajectory. We have also demonstrated the ‘compensatory’ mechanism at the level of domains in one of the domain repeat-containing RNA-binding proteins.     

Inhibition of the biosynthesis of SRP polypeptides and secretory proteins by aflatoxin B1 can disrupt protein targeting

Cell culture and western blotting studies revealed that aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1)) inhibits the biosynthesis of two of the constituent polypeptides of signal recognition particle (SRP) (SRP54 and 72). SRP escorts polyribosomes carrying signal peptides from free form in the cytosol to the bound form on endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane during protein targeting. These effects of AFB(1) on SRP biosynthesis may inhibit the formation of functional SRP. Our experiments have further shown that AFB(1) also inhibits the biosynthesis/translocation of a secretory protein, preprolactin, which fails to appear in the lumen of ER consequent to the treatment with this hepatocarcinogen. The results of the experiments presented in this article therefore enable us to infer for the first time that aflatoxin B(1) may inhibit the functioning of SRP as an escort and deplete the ER of polyribosomes for secretory protein synthesis. As these secretory proteins are important components of the plasma membrane, gap junctions and intercellular matrix, their absence from these locations could disturb cell to cell communication leading to tumorigenesis.     

原核生物信号识别颗粒（SRP）介导蛋白识别转运途径的研究进展

SRP介导的蛋白识别转运过程首先在真核细胞中发现,作用机制已经研究清楚;而SRP在原核细胞中的发现较晚,虽然该途径主要功能蛋白的序列同真核细胞相似,进化上比较保守,但作用机制还未完全揭示,而且SRP体系在原核生物物种间有一定差别,预示着其机制既有统一性,又具有物种特异性。目前原核生物SRP途径的研究主要集中在Ffh、FtsY和4.5SRNA结构与功能,以及这一过程中能量物质GTP的代谢和作用;文章以此为着眼点,概括总结了原核生物中SRP介导蛋白识别转运的研究进展,同时简单介绍了链霉菌中SRP介导蛋白识别转运的研究近况。希望通过链霉菌的相关研究,从进化角度完善和统一原核生物SRP途径的作用机制。     

Molecular characterization of human ninein protein: two distinct subdomains required for centrosomal targeting and regulating signals in cell cycle

The centrosomal protein ninein has been identified as a microtubules minus end capping, centriole position, and anchoring protein, but the true physiological function remains to be determined. In this report, using immunofluorescence analysis and GFP-fusions we show that coiled-coil II domain (CCII domain, 1303-2096) co-localized with gamma-tubulin and centrin at the centrosome. We further narrow down within 83 amino acids and classify a new centrosomal targeting signal. Interestingly, antibodies raised against CCII domain reveal that ninein protein declines from spindle poles during mitosis, but reaccumulates at centrosomes at the end of cell division. Moreover, the data also suggest that fragment 1783-1866 may be attributed to declined signal of ninein. In kinase assay, we show that CCII domain could readily be phosphorylated by AIK and PKA. Taken together, our results suggest that ninein protein contains two distinct subdomains which are required for targeting and regulating asymmetry centrosomes. Importantly, the decline of ninein during mitosis implies that this centrosomal protein may play a role to regulate the process of chromosome segregation without discrimination. The model we propose here will foster a clearer picture of how two asymmetric centrosomes could direct and ensure the correct segregation of chromosomes during the mitotic stage.     

Rho小G蛋白介导的细胞周期调控

Rho小G蛋白作为一个信号分子家族具有多样化的功能, 可以调节细胞骨架重排 、细胞迁移、细胞极性、基因表达、细胞周期调控等. Rho小G蛋白家族对细胞周期 调控的研究主要集中在其对于有丝分裂期细胞的调节作用,包括调节有丝分裂期前 期细胞趋圆化、后期染色体排列及收缩环的收缩作用.近期的研究显示,Rho小G蛋白及其效应分子对于细胞周期G1、S、G2期的调控主要是通过影响细胞周期的正调控因子细胞周期蛋白D1 (cyclin D1) 和负调控因子细胞周期蛋白依赖型激酶相互作用蛋白1及细胞周期蛋白依赖型激酶抑制蛋白27 (p21cip1/p27kip1) 进行的.本文总结了Rho小G蛋白及其效应分子在细胞周期调控,尤其是对G1/S期调控的研究进展,并简要阐述了Rho小G蛋白介导的细胞周期调控异常与癌症发生的关系.     

A Functional GTPase Domain,but not its Transmembrane Domain,is Required for Function of the SRP Receptor β-subunit

The signal recognition particle and its receptor (SR) target nascent secretory proteins to the ER. SR is a heterodimeric ER membrane protein whose subunits, SRα and SRβ, are both members of the GTPase superfamily. Here we characterize a 27-kD protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (encoded by SRP102) as a homologue of mammalian SRβ. This notion is supported (a) by Srp102p''s sequence similarity to SRβ; (b) by its disposition as an ER membrane protein; (c) by its interaction with Srp101p, the yeast SRα homologue; and (d) by its role in SRP-dependent protein targeting in vivo. The GTP-binding site in Srp102p is surprisingly insensitive to single amino acid substitutions that inactivate other GTPases. Multiple mutations in the GTP-binding site, however, inactivate Srp102p. Loss of activity parallels a loss of affinity between Srp102p and Srp101p, indicating that the interaction between SR subunits is important for function. Deleting the transmembrane domain of Srp102p, the only known membrane anchor in SR, renders SR soluble in the cytosol, which unexpectedly does not significantly impair SR function. This result suggests that SR functions as a regulatory switch that needs to associate with the ER membrane only transiently through interactions with other components.     

Interplay of signal recognition particle and trigger factor at L23 near the nascent chain exit site on the Escherichia coli ribosome

As newly synthesized polypeptides emerge from the ribosome, they interact with chaperones and targeting factors that assist in folding and targeting to the proper location in the cell. In Escherichia coli, the chaperone trigger factor (TF) binds to nascent polypeptides early in biosynthesis facilitated by its affinity for the ribosomal proteins L23 and L29 that are situated around the nascent chain exit site on the ribosome. The targeting factor signal recognition particle (SRP) interacts specifically with the signal anchor (SA) sequence in nascent inner membrane proteins (IMPs). Here, we have used photocross-linking to map interactions of the SA sequence in a short, in vitro-synthesized, nascent IMP. Both TF and SRP were found to interact with the SA with partially overlapping binding specificity. In addition, extensive contacts with L23 and L29 were detected. Both purified TF and SRP could be cross-linked to L23 on nontranslating ribosomes with a competitive advantage for SRP. The results suggest a role for L23 in the targeting of IMPs as an attachment site for TF and SRP that is close to the emerging nascent chain.     

A polyglycine stretch is necessary for proper targeting of the protein translocation channel precursor to the outer envelope membrane of chloroplasts

Toc75 is a protein translocation channel in the outer envelope membrane of chloroplasts and its presence is essential for the biogenesis of the organelles. Toc75 is the only protein identified so far in the outer membrane of chloroplasts or mitochondria that is synthesized as a larger precursor, preToc75, with a bipartite transit peptide. Its N-terminus targets the protein to the stroma and is removed by the stromal processing peptidase, whereas its C-terminus mediates envelope targeting and is removed by a yet unknown peptidase. Several conserved domains have been identified in the C-terminal portion of the preToc75 transit peptide from six plant species. We evaluated their importance in the biogenesis of Toc75 by means of deletion or site-directed mutagenesis, followed by import experiments using isolated chlroplasts. Among the conserved domains, a polyglycine stretch was found to be necessary for envelope targeting. Substitution of this domain with other stretches of a single amino acid such as alanine caused mistargeting of the protein into the stroma, indicating an important role for this domain. Furthermore, a glutamate at +2 and two alanine residues at -3 and -1 to the second cleavage site were found to be important for processing. A potential mechanism for the biogenesis of Toc75 is discussed.