Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Growth Factor Receptor-bound Protein-7 by Focal Adhesion Kinase in the Regulation of Cell Migration, Proliferation, and Tumorigenesis

We have previously reported that growth factor receptor-bound protein-7 (Grb7), an Src-homology 2 (SH2)-containing adaptor protein, enables interaction with focal adhesion kinase (FAK) to regulate cell migration in response to integrin activation. To further elucidate the signaling events mediated by FAK·Grb7 complexes in promoting cell migration and other cellular functions, we firstly examined the phos pho ryl a ted tyrosine site(s) of Grb7 by FAK using an in vivo mutagenesis. We found that FAK was capable of phos pho rylating at least 2 of 12 tyrosine residues within Grb7, Tyr-188 and Tyr-338. Moreover, mutations converting the identified Tyr to Phe inhibited integrin-dependent cell migration as well as impaired cell proliferation but not survival compared with the wild-type control. Interestingly, the above inhibitory effects caused by the tyrosine phos pho ryl a tion-deficient mutants are probably attributed to their down-regulation of phospho-Tyr-397 of FAK, thereby implying a mechanism by competing with wild-type Grb7 for binding to FAK. Consequently, these tyrosine phos pho ryl a tion-deficient mutants evidently altered the phospho-Tyr-118 of paxillin and phos pho ryl a tion of ERK1/2 but less on phospho-Ser-473 of AKT, implying their involvement in the FAK·Grb7-mediated cellular functions. Additionally, we also illustrated that the formation of FAK·Grb7 complexes and Grb7 phos pho ryl a tion by FAK in an integrin-dependent manner were essential for cell migration, proliferation and anchorage-independent growth in A431 epidermal carcinoma cells, indicating the importance of FAK·Grb7 complexes in tumorigenesis. Our data provide a better understanding on the signal transduction event for FAK·Grb7-mediated cellular functions as well as to shed light on a potential therapeutic in cancers.Growth factor receptor bound protein-7 (Grb7)² is initially identified as a SH2 domain-containing adaptor protein bound to the activated EGF receptor (1). Grb7 is composed of an N-terminal proline-rich region, following a putative RA (Ras-associating) domain and a central PH (pleckstrin homology) domain and a BPS motif (between PH and SH2 domains), and a C-terminal SH2 domain (2–6). Despite the lack of enzymatic activity, the presence of multiple protein-protein interaction domains allows Grb7 family adaptor proteins to participate in versatile signal transduction pathways and, therefore, to regulate many cellular functions (4–6). A number of signaling molecules has been reported to interact with these featured domains, although most of the identified Grb7 binding partners are mediated through its SH2 domain. For example, the SH2 domain of Grb7 has been demonstrated to be capable of binding to the phospho-tyrosine sites of EGF receptor (1), ErbB2 (7), ErbB3 and ErbB4 (8), Ret (9), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (10), insulin receptor (11), SHPTP2 (12), Tek/Tie2 (13), caveolin (14), c-Kit (15), EphB1 (16), G6f immunoreceptor protein (17), Rnd1 (18), Shc (7), FAK (19), and so on. The proceeding α-helix of the PH domain of Grb7 is the calmodulin-binding domain responsible for recruiting Grb7 to plasma membrane in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner (20), and the association between the PH domain of Grb7 and phosphoinositides is required for the phosphorylation by FAK (21). Two additional proteins, NIK (nuclear factor κB-inducing kinase) and FHL2 (four and half lim domains isoform 2), in association with the GM region (Grb and Mig homology region) of Grb7 are also reported, although the physiological functions for these interactions remain unknown (22, 23). Recently, other novel roles in translational controls and stress responses through the N terminus of Grb7 are implicated for the findings of Grb7 interacting with the 5′-untranslated region of capped targeted KOR (kappa opioid receptor) mRNA and the Hu antigen R of stress granules in an FAK-mediated phosphorylation manner (24, 25).Unlike its member proteins Grb10 and Grb14, the role of Grb7 in cell migration is unambiguous and well documented. This is supported by a series of studies. Firstly, Grb7 family members share a significantly conserved molecular architecture with the Caenorhabditis elegans Mig-10 protein, which is involved in neuronal cell migration during embryonic development (4, 5, 26), suggesting that Grb7 may play a role in cell migration. Moreover, Grb7 is often co-amplified with Her2/ErbB2 in certain human cancers and tumor cell lines (7, 27, 28), and its overexpression resulted in invasive and metastatic consequences of various cancers and tumor cells (23, 29–33). On the contrary, knocking down Grb7 by RNA interference conferred to an inhibitory outcome of the breast cancer motility (34). Furthermore, interaction of Grb7 with autophosphorylated FAK at Tyr-397 could promote integrin-mediated cell migration in NIH 3T3 and CHO cells, whereas overexpression of its SH2 domain, an dominant negative mutant of Grb7, inhibited cell migration (19, 35). Recruitment and phosphorylation of Grb7 by EphB1 receptors enhanced cell migration in an ephrin-dependent manner (16). Recently, G7–18NATE, a selective Grb7-SH2 domain affinity cyclic peptide, was demonstrated to efficiently block cell migration of tumor cells (32, 36). In addition to cell migration, Grb7 has been shown to play a role in a variety of physiological and pathological events, for instance, kidney development (37), tumorigenesis (7, 14, 38–41), angiogenic activity (20), proliferation (34, 42, 43), anti-apoptosis (44), gene expression regulation (24), Silver-Russell syndrome (45), rheumatoid arthritis (46), atopic dermatitis (47), and T-cell activation (17, 48). Nevertheless, it remains largely unknown regarding the downstream signaling events of Grb7-mediated various functions. In particular, given the role of Grb7 as an adaptor molecule and its SH2 domain mainly interacting with upstream regulators, it will be interesting to identify potential downstream effectors through interacting with the functional GM region or N-terminal proline-rich region.In this report, we identified two tyrosine phosphorylated sites of Grb7 by FAK and deciphered the signaling targets downstream through these phosphorylated tyrosine sites to regulate various cellular functions such as cell migration, proliferation, and survival. In addition, our study sheds light on tyrosine phosphorylation of Grb7 by FAK involved in tumorigenesis.     

ASAP1, a Phospholipid-Dependent Arf GTPase-Activating Protein That Associates with and Is Phosphorylated by Src

Membrane trafficking is regulated in part by small GTP-binding proteins of the ADP-ribosylation factor (Arf) family. Arf function depends on the controlled exchange and hydrolysis of GTP. We have purified and cloned two variants of a 130-kDa phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate (PIP₂)-dependent Arf1 GTPase-activating protein (GAP), which we call ASAP1a and ASAP1b. Both contain a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, a zinc finger similar to that found in another Arf GAP, three ankyrin (ANK) repeats, a proline-rich region with alternative splicing and SH3 binding motifs, eight repeats of the sequence E/DLPPKP, and an SH3 domain. Together, the PH, zinc finger, and ANK repeat regions possess PIP₂-dependent GAP activity on Arf1 and Arf5, less activity on Arf6, and no detectable activity on Arl2 in vitro. The cDNA for ASAP1 was independently identified in a screen for proteins that interact with the SH3 domain of the tyrosine kinase Src. ASAP1 associates in vitro with the SH3 domains of Src family members and with the Crk adapter protein. ASAP1 coprecipitates with Src from cell lysates and is phosphorylated on tyrosine residues in cells expressing activated Src. Both coimmunoprecipitation and tyrosine phosphorylation depend on the same proline-rich class II Src SH3 binding site required for in vitro association. By directly interacting with both Arfs and tyrosine kinases involved in regulating cell growth and cytoskeletal organization, ASAP1 could coordinate membrane remodeling events with these processes.Membrane traffic, the transfer of material between membrane-bound compartments, is needed for such diverse cellular processes as secretion, endocytosis, and changes in cell shape that accompany cell growth, division, and migration (reviewed in references 84, 85, and 87). It is mediated by transport vesicles that are formed by budding from a donor membrane. The process of budding is driven by the assembly of a proteinaceous coat. Once the vesicle is formed, the coat must dissociate to permit fusion with an acceptor membrane and the consequent delivery of the vesicle’s contents. These steps are regulated in part by the Arf family of small GTP-binding proteins (reviewed in references 8, 23, 61, and 63). Arfs are highly conserved and are found in eukaryotes ranging from yeast to humans. The mammalian Arf family is divided into several classes based largely on sequence similarity: class I (Arfs 1 through 3), class II (Arfs 4 and 5), class III (Arf6), and the more distantly related Arf-like (Arl) class. By linking GTP binding and hydrolysis to coat assembly and disassembly, Arfs regulate membrane trafficking at a number of sites. Arf1 has been implicated in endoplasmic reticulum-to-Golgi and intra-Golgi transport, endosome-to-endosome fusion, and synaptic vesicle formation (8, 23, 28, 61, 63, 66). Arf6 has been implicated in regulation of membrane traffic between the plasma membrane and a specialized endocytic compartment, and its function has been linked to cytoskeletal reorganization (25, 26, 71, 73, 74). The specific sites of action of the other Arf family members are not known.The hydrolysis of GTP on Arf requires a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) (19, 61). With multiple Arfs and multiple sites of action, the existence of several unique Arf GAPs had been anticipated. A number of activities have been purified or partially purified from mammalian sources, including rat liver (19, 57, 77), rat spleen (21), and bovine brain (79), and two Arf GAP activities from rat liver have been resolved (77). They have similar Arf specificities but differ in their lipid dependencies. One of the Arf GAPs (ArfGAP/ArfGAP1, hereafter referred to as ArfGAP1) which functions in the Golgi is activated by dioleoglycerols (3, 4, 19, 40). ArfGAP1, in common with a yeast Arf GAP, GCS1 (72), contains a zinc finger domain which is required for activity (19). The second Arf GAP (ArfGAP2) is specifically activated by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP₂) and phosphatidic acid (PA). Based on lipid requirements, ArfGAP2 was speculated to function at the plasma membrane and be regulated independently of ArfGAP1 (77). ArfGAP1 and ArfGAP2 were antigenically distinct and, therefore, likely to be distinct gene products; however, prior to this study, only ArfGAP1 had been cloned (19).Src, a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase with N-terminal Src homology 3 (SH3) and SH2 domains, transduces signals important for cell growth and cytoskeletal organization (12, 68, 91). A number of studies suggest that Src is also involved in regulating membrane traffic. Src associates primarily with endosomal membranes and in several cell types has been localized to specialized secretory vesicles, including synaptic vesicles (5, 20, 34, 46, 54, 69, 81). Overexpression of Src accelerates endocytosis (95). In addition, Src associates with or phosphorylates several proteins involved in membrane trafficking (5, 31, 43, 65).Here, we report the purification and cloning of a PIP₂-dependent Arf GAP, ASAP1. ASAP1 contains a zinc finger domain similar to that required for GAP activity in ArfGAP1 and GCS1. ASAP1 also contains a number of domains that are likely to be involved in regulation and/or localization: a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, three ankyrin (ANK) repeats, a proline-rich region with SH3 binding motifs, and an SH3 domain. In addition, ASAP1 was identified independently as a binding protein for Src and was found to be phosphorylated on tyrosine in cells that express activated Src. ASAP1 also associated with the adapter protein c-Crk in vitro. ASAP1 was localized to the cytoplasm and the cell edge likely associated with the plasma membrane. We propose that ASAP1, by binding both Src and PIP₂, could coordinate membrane trafficking with cell growth or actin cytoskeleton remodeling.     

Enhanced Prediction of Src Homology 2 (SH2) Domain Binding Potentials Using a Fluorescence Polarization-derived c-Met,c-Kit,ErbB, and Androgen Receptor Interactome

Many human diseases are associated with aberrant regulation of phosphoprotein signaling networks. Src homology 2 (SH2) domains represent the major class of protein domains in metazoans that interact with proteins phosphorylated on the amino acid residue tyrosine. Although current SH2 domain prediction algorithms perform well at predicting the sequences of phosphorylated peptides that are likely to result in the highest possible interaction affinity in the context of random peptide library screens, these algorithms do poorly at predicting the interaction potential of SH2 domains with physiologically derived protein sequences. We employed a high throughput interaction assay system to empirically determine the affinity between 93 human SH2 domains and phosphopeptides abstracted from several receptor tyrosine kinases and signaling proteins. The resulting interaction experiments revealed over 1000 novel peptide-protein interactions and provided a glimpse into the common and specific interaction potentials of c-Met, c-Kit, GAB1, and the human androgen receptor. We used these data to build a permutation-based logistic regression classifier that performed considerably better than existing algorithms for predicting the interaction potential of several SH2 domains.Src homology 2 protein domains (SH2)¹ are modular self-folding entities of about 100 amino acids that bind to tyrosine-phosphorylated peptide sequences contained within target proteins. The SH2 domain (1–3) was originally described nearly 20 years ago as an N-terminal region of the FES protein kinase that was not required for kinase activity but was important for its regulation. More recent studies have demonstrated that SH2 domains exist in many signaling molecules, including PLCγ1, Ras GAP, c-Src, and PI3KR. SH2 domains have been shown to enable the interaction of these signaling proteins with growth factor receptors such as FGFR1, EGFR, c-Met, and PDGFR in a phosphospecific manner (4–9). Subsequently, random peptide library screening approaches were used to define sequence motifs that resulted in the highest affinity interactions within particular SH2 domain classes (10, 11). For example, peptide sequences containing the pYEEI, pYXN, and pYMXM motifs were described to result in the highest affinity interactions with the SH2 domains from c-Src, Grb2, and the PI3KR SH2 domains, respectively. Data from such experiments have been used to generate predictions regarding the likelihood that any particular peptide sequence will interact with any particular SH2 domain (12–14).Unfortunately, the predictive performance of these algorithms has not been thoroughly empirically tested or optimized for biologically derived peptide sequences. We and others reported the first comprehensive cloning, expression, and functional analysis of human genome-encoded SH2 domains using a protein microarray-based interaction analysis approach (15–17). Similarly, peptide arrays have been used to query the interaction potential of SH2 domains with biologically derived peptide sequences in a semi-quantitative manner (18). These studies demonstrated that most biologically derived peptide sequences contained within RTKs and signaling proteins do not represent best fit sequence motifs and interact at a much lower affinity than with the optimal sequence motifs identified previously from random peptide libraries. Studies with biologically derived peptides indicated that context nonpermissive amino acids often contribute as much predictive information regarding interaction selectivity as positively contributing amino acids (19). Taken together, these results suggest that the collection of large quantitative protein interaction datasets between SH2 domains and biologically derived peptide sequences might be informative for building better algorithms that predict bona fide SH2 domain interaction sites within human protein sequences.Although protein microarrays enabled the first systems-level glimpse at SH2 domain selectivity (15, 17), they had several limitations that resulted in reduced ability to identify low affinity interactions in comparison with solution phase methods (20). We therefore designed a high throughput fluorescence polarization approach that allowed for lower affinity interactions to be defined between SH2 domains and phosphopeptides of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) than was possible with protein microarrays (20).RTKs are vital mediators of signal transduction in multicellular organisms. RTKs typically function as transmembrane receptors that contain a tyrosine kinase and other motifs that enable interaction with other intracellular proteins. Human cells often express many different RTK proteins from the set of 57 RTK genes encoded by the human genome (21). These RTKs may be activated in different combinations to transduce common and specific downstream signals (22). For a recent review of the complexity of RTK signaling networks, see Ref. 23. Following activation, RTKs are phosphorylated on several intracellular tyrosine residues that serve as recruitment sites for SH2 domains (15–18, 20). Activation of RTK signaling networks may cause changes in cellular motility, proliferation, survival, and cytoskeletal arrangement. Definition of their signaling capacity represents an important and unsolved problem in cell biology. Although most studies to date have focused on the role of singular RTKs in cancer progression, co-activation of RTKs derived from several unique RTK genes has recently emerged as an important driver of cancer progression (24–27). Co-activation of modules of RTKs may provide robustness against therapies designed to inhibit a single RTK (25).Herein, we profiled the interaction potential of two RTKs and two signaling proteins and compared them with the recruitment potential of the ErbB family that we have previously profiled (28). The ErbB family, c-Met, and c-Kit RTKs have been shown to drive the progression of many cancer types, including breast, head and neck, lung (29), gastrointestinal, and stomach cancers (30). Downstream adaptor proteins often augment the signaling potential of RTKs by acting as scaffolds for recruitment of many additional proteins (31–33). Therefore, we also included peptides in our study derived from the Gab1 adaptor protein, which is critical for mediating signaling networks downstream of c-Met and potentially other RTKs (34).Finally, alternative oncogenic signaling networks may have points of cross-talk with tyrosine kinase signaling networks. Steroid hormone receptors such as the androgen receptor (AR) have been shown to associate with RTKs such as EGFR (35), to be substrates of tyrosine kinases (36, 37), and to drive the progression of prostate cancer (36). We therefore queried the interaction potential of phosphopeptides derived from AR with a set of 93 of the 120 SH2 domains encoded in the human genome. We subsequently used this interaction dataset to develop a permutation-based logistic regression classifier (PEBL) for predicting the interaction potential of SH2 domains and biologically derived phosphotyrosine-containing peptides.     

Tyrosine Phosphorylation of the Lyn Src Homology 2 (SH2) Domain Modulates Its Binding Affinity and Specificity

Src homology 2 (SH2) domains are modular protein structures that bind phosphotyrosine (pY)-containing polypeptides and regulate cellular functions through protein-protein interactions. Proteomics analysis showed that the SH2 domains of Src family kinases are themselves tyrosine phosphorylated in blood system cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple myeloma. Using the Src family kinase Lyn SH2 domain as a model, we found that phosphorylation at the conserved SH2 domain residue Y¹⁹⁴ impacts the affinity and specificity of SH2 domain binding to pY-containing peptides and proteins. Analysis of the Lyn SH2 domain crystal structure supports a model wherein phosphorylation of Y¹⁹⁴ on the EF loop modulates the binding pocket that engages amino acid side chains at the pY+2/+3 position. These data indicate another level of regulation wherein SH2-mediated protein-protein interactions are modulated by SH2 kinases and phosphatases.Src homology 2 (SH2) domains are modular protein structures that are important for signal transduction due to their ability to bind phosphotyrosine (pY)-containing polypeptides within defined amino acid sequence motifs (1). SH2 domains are found in various signaling enzymes and adaptor proteins. Given the reversibility of protein tyrosine phosphorylation and the affinity of SH2-pY binding, the interactions of SH2 domains are inherently dynamic and diverse. Indeed, selective, transient binding to pY motifs is a key mechanism through which intracellular signaling networks are dynamically assembled, localized, and regulated. In addition to mediating protein interactions in trans, SH2 domains bind intramolecularly (2). For example, in Src family kinases (SFKs), the SH2 domain binds in cis to the phosphorylated C-terminal tail as a mechanism to constrain and thereby auto-inhibit the intervening tyrosine kinase domain (3, 4). As well, SH2 domains of cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases have been shown to affect the kinase activity of adjacent kinase domains through allosteric interactions (5). The SFKs are therefore highly regulated as a function of their SH2 domains, which exist in dynamic equilibrium between intra- and intermolecular interactions (6). Hence, as discussed by Pawson (7), the transient and diverse interactions of an SH2 domain can regulate signaling enzymes and constitutes a major mechanism of signal transduction in response to extracellular signals.The structure of the SH2 domain has been extensively characterized. At its core is a conserved antiparallel β-sheet sandwiched between two α-helices (8). SH2 domains bind phosphotyrosine-containing peptides in an extended conformation across the central β-sheet, with the pY residue inserted in a deep recognition pocket formed by conserved residues from strands βB, βC, and βD, helix αA, and the phosphate binding loop. Peptide binding specificity is determined by more variable binding surfaces on the SH2 domain, which recognize residues C-terminal to the pY residue. For the SFK SH2 domains, the three residues C-terminal to the pY residue (pY+1,+2,+3) are dominant determinants of specificity (9, 10), with the domain binding most tightly to sequences containing the motif pYEEI (11, 12). The hydrophobic pY+3 residue inserts in a deep hydrophobic specificity pocket defined by residues of the EF and BG loops (8, 13, 14). Indeed, structural analysis of the SH2 domain revealed that the configuration of the EF and BG loops is critical in dictating SH2 domain specificity by shaping the ligand-binding surface and controlling accessibility of the pY+3 binding pocket (15). Mutation of a single residue of the EF loop can drastically impact peptide binding specificity by altering the pY+3 pocket (15–17), indicating the importance of the pY+3 pocket in substrate selectivity for the SFK SH2 domains.In addition to binding pY-containing polypeptides, SH2 domains themselves may be modulated by phosphorylation. For example, phosphorylation of the Src SH2 domain at conserved Y²¹³ resulted in activation of the cognate kinase domain, possibly by impairing SH2 binding to the phosphorylated C-terminal tail (18). Similarly, phosphorylation of Lck at the equivalent SH2 residue (Y¹⁹²) generally reduced binding to pY-peptides and proteins (19). Phosphorylation at S⁶⁹⁰ in the SH2 domain of the p85α subunit of PI 3-kinase decreased its affinity for pY-containing proteins and promoted feedback inhibition of PI 3-kinase and Akt in response to cellular starvation (20). Conversely, tyrosine phosphorylation of the tensin-3 SH2 domain stimulated substrate binding and biological activity (21). Therefore, phosphorylation of SH2 domains appears to be a general mechanism for modulating their binding properties.Here, we report that Y¹⁹⁴ in the SH2 domain of the SFK Lyn, a residue conserved in SFK SH2 domains, is frequently phosphorylated in hematopoietic and other cancers. In vitro protein and peptide interactions with the Lyn SH2 domain were affected by this phosphorylation. Our results suggest that tyrosine phosphorylation of the SFK SH2 domain modulates both its binding affinity and specificity and may constitute another layer of regulation in signaling networks.     

A JAK2 Interdomain Linker Relays Epo Receptor Engagement Signals to Kinase Activation

JAK2 (Janus kinase 2) is essential for cytokine receptor signaling, and several lines of evidence support a causal role of an activating JAK2 mutation in myeloproliferative disorders. JAK2 activity is autoinhibited by its pseudokinase domain in the basal state, and the inhibition is released by cytokine stimulation; how engagement of the cognate receptor triggers this release is unknown. From a functional screen for gain-of-function JAK2 mutations, we discovered 13 missense mutations, nine in the pseudokinase domain and four in the Src homology 2 (SH2)-pseudokinase domain linker. These mutations identified determinants for autoinhibition and inducible activation in JAK2. Two of the mutants, K539I and N622I, resulted in erythrocytosis in mice. Scanning mutagenesis of the SH2-pseudokinase domain linker indicated that its N-terminal part was essential for interaction of JAK2 with the Epo receptor, whereas certain mutations in the C-terminal region conferred constitutive activation. We further showed that substitutions for Glu⁵⁴³-Asp⁵⁴⁴ in this linker or Leu⁶¹¹, Arg⁶⁸³, or Phe⁶⁹⁴ in the hinge proximal region of the pseudokinase domain resulted in activated JAK2 mutants that could not be further stimulated by Epo. These results suggest that the SH2-pseudokinase domain linker acts as a switch that relays cytokine engagement to JAK2 activation by flexing the pseudokinase domain hinge.The Janus family of tyrosine kinases (JAKs)² are key regulators of cytokine receptor signaling in hematopoiesis and immune responses (1). Of the four mammalian JAK kinases, JAK2 transmits signals for a variety of cytokine receptors, including the erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) that is essential for red blood cell production (2). Upon Epo stimulation, JAK2 activates downstream signaling, such as STAT5, Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT pathways (2). Mice deficient in Epo, EpoR, or JAK2 die embryonically due to the absence of definitive erythropoiesis (3–5).In addition to regulation by phosphatases and suppressors of cytokine signaling (6, 7), JAK2 kinase activity is critically controlled by an autoinhibitory mechanism. Like other JAK members, JAK2 contains an N-terminal segment followed by a pseudokinase domain and a C-terminal tyrosine kinase domain. The N-terminal segment, consisting of a FERM (protein 4.1, ezrin, moezin, radixin homologous) domain and an atypical SH2 domain (1), mediates association with the membrane-proximal region of the cytokine receptors (8). Binding of JAK2 through its N-terminal segment to the EpoR is essential for EpoR surface expression (9). The pseudokinase domain is predicted to adopt a kinase fold but lacks residues essential for catalysis (10). Deletion of the pseudokinase domain leads to a marked increase in JAK2 kinase activity and loss of response to cytokine stimulation (11–13). Therefore, this domain is essential for JAK2 autoinhibition and is essential for JAK2 activation upon cytokine stimulation. Consistent with this notion, a point mutation in the JAK2 pseudokinase domain was identified in the majority of myeloproliferative disorder patients, including 90% of polycythemia vera (PV) patients (14–18). This mutation, V617F, in the presence of a dimerized receptor scaffold, such as the EpoR, resulted in the constitutive activation of JAK2 and downstream signaling effectors (19, 20) and caused erythrocytosis in a murine bone marrow transplant model (14, 21–23). Recently, mutations immediately adjacent to the JAK2 pseudokinase domain in the SH2-pseudokinase domain linker were identified in PV patients and shown to cause constitutive activation of JAK2 and a PV-like phenotype in mice (24–26). The molecular mechanisms underlying the control of JAK2 activity (i.e. the swift augmentation of its activity upon receptor activation) are poorly understood. The residues involved in the autoinhibition in JAK2 are unknown.In this work, we sought to characterize the regulatory mechanisms controlling JAK2 kinase activity. Using a functional screen for activating JAK2 mutations that signal constitutively, we discovered 13 mutations in the pseudokinase domain and in the SH2-pseudokinase domain linker. These mutations identified specific residues that are important for the inhibition of basal JAK2 kinase activity and for cytokine-induced JAK2 activation. In addition, we showed that the SH2-pseudokinase domain linker is essential for interaction with the EpoR, autoinhibitory regulation, and Epo-inducible JAK2 activation and may act as a switch in relaying cytokine receptor engagement to JAK2 activation by flexing the pseudokinase domain hinge.     

Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Algorithms for Finding Small Attractors in Boolean Networks

A Boolean network is a model used to study the interactions between different genes in genetic regulatory networks. In this paper, we present several algorithms using gene ordering and feedback vertex sets to identify singleton attractors and small attractors in Boolean networks. We analyze the average case time complexities of some of the proposed algorithms. For instance, it is shown that the outdegree-based ordering algorithm for finding singleton attractors works in time for , which is much faster than the naive time algorithm, where is the number of genes and is the maximum indegree. We performed extensive computational experiments on these algorithms, which resulted in good agreement with theoretical results. In contrast, we give a simple and complete proof for showing that finding an attractor with the shortest period is NP-hard.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Sip1, a Novel RS Domain-Containing Protein Essential for Pre-mRNA Splicing

Previous studies have shown that protein-protein interactions among splicing factors may play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing. We report here identification and functional characterization of a new splicing factor, Sip1 (SC35-interacting protein 1). Sip1 was initially identified by virtue of its interaction with SC35, a splicing factor of the SR family. Sip1 interacts with not only several SR proteins but also with U1-70K and U2AF65, proteins associated with 5′ and 3′ splice sites, respectively. The predicted Sip1 sequence contains an arginine-serine-rich (RS) domain but does not have any known RNA-binding motifs, indicating that it is not a member of the SR family. Sip1 also contains a region with weak sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator suppressor of white apricot (SWAP). An essential role for Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing was suggested by the observation that anti-Sip1 antibodies depleted splicing activity from HeLa nuclear extract. Purified recombinant Sip1 protein, but not other RS domain-containing proteins such as SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, restored the splicing activity of the Sip1-immunodepleted extract. Addition of U2AF65 protein further enhanced the splicing reconstitution by the Sip1 protein. Deficiency in the formation of both A and B splicing complexes in the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract indicates an important role of Sip1 in spliceosome assembly. Together, these results demonstrate that Sip1 is a novel RS domain-containing protein required for pre-mRNA splicing and that the functional role of Sip1 in splicing is distinct from those of known RS domain-containing splicing factors.Pre-mRNA splicing takes place in spliceosomes, the large RNA-protein complexes containing pre-mRNA, U1, U2, U4/6, and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), and a large number of accessory protein factors (for reviews, see references 21, 22, 37, 44, and 48). It is increasingly clear that the protein factors are important for pre-mRNA splicing and that studies of these factors are essential for further understanding of molecular mechanisms of pre-mRNA splicing.Most mammalian splicing factors have been identified by biochemical fractionation and purification (3, 15, 19, 31–36, 45, 69–71, 73), by using antibodies recognizing splicing factors (8, 9, 16, 17, 61, 66, 67, 74), and by sequence homology (25, 52, 74).Splicing factors containing arginine-serine-rich (RS) domains have emerged as important players in pre-mRNA splicing. These include members of the SR family, both subunits of U2 auxiliary factor (U2AF), and the U1 snRNP protein U1-70K (for reviews, see references 18, 41, and 59). Drosophila alternative splicing regulators transformer (Tra), transformer 2 (Tra2), and suppressor of white apricot (SWAP) also contain RS domains (20, 40, 42). RS domains in these proteins play important roles in pre-mRNA splicing (7, 71, 75), in nuclear localization of these splicing proteins (23, 40), and in protein-RNA interactions (56, 60, 64). Previous studies by us and others have demonstrated that one mechanism whereby SR proteins function in splicing is to mediate specific protein-protein interactions among spliceosomal components and between general splicing factors and alternative splicing regulators (1, 1a, 6, 10, 27, 63, 74, 77). Such protein-protein interactions may play critical roles in splice site recognition and association (for reviews, see references 4, 18, 37, 41, 47 and 59). Specific interactions among the splicing factors also suggest that it is possible to identify new splicing factors by their interactions with known splicing factors.Here we report identification of a new splicing factor, Sip1, by its interaction with the essential splicing factor SC35. The predicted Sip1 protein sequence contains an RS domain and a region with sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator, SWAP. We have expressed and purified recombinant Sip1 protein and raised polyclonal antibodies against the recombinant Sip1 protein. The anti-Sip1 antibodies specifically recognize a protein migrating at a molecular mass of approximately 210 kDa in HeLa nuclear extract. The anti-Sip1 antibodies sufficiently deplete Sip1 protein from the nuclear extract, and the Sip1-depleted extract is inactive in pre-mRNA splicing. Addition of recombinant Sip1 protein can partially restore splicing activity to the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract, indicating an essential role of Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing. Other RS domain-containing proteins, including SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, cannot substitute for Sip1 in reconstituting splicing activity of the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract. However, addition of U2AF65 further increases splicing activity of Sip1-reconstituted nuclear extract, suggesting that there may be a functional interaction between Sip1 and U2AF65 in nuclear extract.     

Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.