Identification and Functional Characterization of a Novel Nuclear Localization Signal Present in the Yeast Nab2 Poly(A)+ RNA Binding Protein

The nuclear import of proteins bearing a basic nuclear localization signal (NLS) is dependent on karyopherin α/importin α, which acts as the NLS receptor, and karyopherin β1/importin β, which binds karyopherin α and mediates the nuclear import of the resultant ternary complex. Recently, a second nuclear import pathway that allows the rapid reentry into the nucleus of proteins that participate in the nuclear export of mature mRNAs has been identified. In mammalian cells, a single NLS specific for this alternate pathway, the M9 NLS of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (hnRNPA1), has been described. The M9 NLS binds a transport factor related to karyopherin β1, termed karyopherin β2 or transportin, and does not require a karyopherin α-like adapter protein. A yeast homolog of karyopherin β2, termed Kap104p, has also been described and proposed to play a role in the nuclear import of a yeast hnRNP-like protein termed Nab2p. Here, we define a Nab2p sequence that binds to Kap104p and that functions as an NLS in both human and yeast cells despite lacking any evident similarity to basic or M9 NLSs. Using an in vitro nuclear import assay, we demonstrate that Kap104p can direct the import into isolated human cell nuclei of a substrate containing a wild-type, but not a defective mutant, Nab2p NLS. In contrast, other NLSs, including the M9 NLS, could not function as substrates for Kap104p. Surprisingly, this in vitro assay also revealed that human karyopherin β1, but not the Kap104p homolog karyopherin β2, could direct the efficient nuclear import of a Nab2p NLS substrate in vitro in the absence of karyopherin α. These data therefore identify a novel NLS sequence, active in both yeast and mammalian cells, that is functionally distinct from both basic and M9 NLS sequences.     

Crystal Structure of Human Poly(A) Polymerase Gamma Reveals a Conserved Catalytic Core for Canonical Poly(A) Polymerases

In eukaryotes, the poly(A) tail added at the 3′ end of an mRNA precursor is essential for the regulation of mRNA stability and the initiation of translation. Poly(A) polymerase (PAP) is the enzyme that catalyzes the poly(A) addition reaction. Multiple isoforms of PAP have been identified in vertebrates, which originate from gene duplication, alternative splicing or post-translational modifications. The complexity of PAP isoforms suggests that they might play different roles in the cell. Phylogenetic studies indicate that vertebrate PAPs are grouped into three clades termed α, β and γ, which originated from two gene duplication events. To date, all the available PAP structures are from the PAPα clade. Here, we present the crystal structure of the first representative of the PAPγ clade, human PAPγ bound to cordycepin triphosphate (3′dATP) and Ca^2 +. The structure revealed that PAPγ closely resembles its PAPα ortholog. An analysis of residue conservation reveals a conserved catalytic binding pocket, whereas residues at the surface of the polymerase are more divergent.     

Cytoplasmic Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Associated with Free Messenger Ribonucleoprotein Particles in Rat Brain

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase associated with free cytoplasmic messenger ribonucleoprotein particles (free mRNP particles) carrying messenger RNA has been characterized in rat brain. There were first-order kinetics for NAD with an apparent Km for NAD of 90.5 +/- 0.70 microM and Vmax of 19.7 +/- 2.8 pmol ADP-ribose incorporated min-1 mg protein-1. Five poly(ADP-ribose) protein acceptors were identified in the Mr 37,000-120,000 range. It is hypothesized that ADP-ribosylation of specific free mRNP proteins might play a role in the derepression and translation of the silent mRNAs of free mRNP particles.     

多聚腺苷酸结合蛋白的结构与功能

多聚腺苷酸结合蛋白[poly（A）-binding protein,PABP]是一类可以与mRNA 3′端Poly（A）结合的高度保守的蛋白质,可通过与Poly（A）的结合参与mRNA的翻译并调节其稳定性。PABP在脊椎动物配子发生和早期胚胎聋亨中也发挥重要的作用。PABP成员还在不断的发现之中,不同类型的细胞中具有结构和功能各异的Poly（A）结合蛋白。     

Poly(A) Tail Length Is Controlled by the Nuclear Poly(A)-binding Protein Regulating the Interaction between Poly(A) Polymerase and the Cleavage and Polyadenylation Specificity Factor

Poly(A) tails of mRNAs are synthesized in the cell nucleus with a defined length, ∼250 nucleotides in mammalian cells. The same type of length control is seen in an in vitro polyadenylation system reconstituted from three proteins: poly(A) polymerase, cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF), and the nuclear poly(A)-binding protein (PABPN1). CPSF, binding the polyadenylation signal AAUAAA, and PABPN1, binding the growing poly(A) tail, cooperatively stimulate poly(A) polymerase such that a complete poly(A) tail is synthesized in one processive event, which terminates at a length of ∼250 nucleotides. We report that PABPN1 is required to restrict CPSF binding to the AAUAAA sequence and to permit the stimulation of poly(A) polymerase by AAUAAA-bound CPSF to be maintained throughout the elongation reaction. The stimulation by CPSF is disrupted when the poly(A) tail has reached a length of ∼250 nucleotides, and this terminates processive elongation. PABPN1 measures the length of the tail and is responsible for disrupting the CPSF-poly(A) polymerase interaction.The poly(A) tails present at the 3′ end of almost all eukaryotic mRNAs have two major functions. The first function is in the control of mRNA decay; degradation of the poly(A) tail by a 3′ exonuclease (deadenylation) is the first step in both of the two main pathways of mRNA decay, and the completion of deadenylation triggers the second step, either cap hydrolysis or further 3′–5′ degradation. Because the rate of deadenylation is governed by sequence elements in the mRNA, it is specific for each mRNA species and serves as a major determinant of mRNA half-life (1–3). Obviously, a control of mRNA stability by the rate of deadenylation requires a defined poly(A) length as a starting point. The second function of the poly(A) tail is in the initiation of translation; the cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding protein associated with the poly(A) tail promotes the initiation of translation by an interaction with the initiation factor eIF4G and probably through additional mechanisms (4–7). In this process, poly(A) tail length can also be important. For example, gene regulation during oocyte maturation and early embryonic development of animals depends on translational regulation of maternal mRNAs, and changes in poly(A) tail lengths of specific mRNAs, determined both by deadenylation and by regulated cytoplasmic poly(A) extension, play a major role in this translational regulation. Long poly(A) tails favor translation, whereas a shortening of the tail promotes translational inactivation of the message (8, 9). Similar mechanisms seem to operate in neurons (10, 11) and possibly in other somatic cells (12).Because the length of the poly(A) tail is important for its function, it is not surprising that poly(A) tails are generally synthesized with a defined length, which is species-specific, ∼70–90 nucleotides in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (13, 14) and ∼250 nucleotides in mammalian cells (15). Subtle differences between newly made poly(A) tails of different mRNAs have been described (13), and there is even a class of mRNAs that never receives more than an oligo(A) tail (16, 17). However, the heterogeneous length distribution seen in the steady-state mRNA population is the result of cytoplasmic shortening starting from a relatively well defined initial tail length; heterogeneity of tail length reflects age differences of the mRNA molecules. The oligo(A) tails present on inactive mRNAs in oocytes or embryos are also generated by shortening of full-length tails made in the cell nucleus (18).The poly(A) tail is added during 3′ end processing of mRNA precursors in the cell nucleus (19–21). This reaction consists of two steps: an endonucleolytic cleavage followed by the addition of the poly(A) tail to the upstream cleavage product. Whereas a large protein machinery of some 20 or more polypeptides (22) is required for the cleavage reaction, subsequent polyadenylation has much simpler protein requirements. In the mammalian system, it can be reconstituted from three proteins: poly(A) polymerase, the enzyme catalyzing primer-dependent polymerization of AMP using ATP as a precursor (23–25); the cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF),⁶ which binds the cleavage and polyadenylation signal AAUAAA (26, 27); and the nuclear poly(A)-binding protein (PABPN1), which binds the growing poly(A) tail (28, 29). Note that PABPN1 is distinct from the family of cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding proteins (30). Roles of poly(A) polymerase and CPSF in polyadenylation in vivo have been most clearly demonstrated by genetic analysis of the orthologues in S. cerevisiae (21, 31). PABPN1 has no functional orthologue in budding yeast (32); its function in polyadenylation has been confirmed in mammalian cells (33) and in Drosophila (34).Whereas PABPN1 and poly(A) polymerase are monomeric proteins, CPSF is a hetero-oligomer, which has not yet been reconstituted from recombinant proteins (22, 26, 35–40). Poly(A) polymerase on its own is barely active because of a low affinity for its RNA substrate and thus acts distributively, i.e. it dissociates from the RNA after each polymerization step, and presumably often before it has incorporated any nucleotide; the enzyme also has no significant sequence specificity and will elongate any RNA with a free 3′ OH (24). Both CPSF and PABPN1 enhance the activity of the polymerase by recruiting the enzyme to its substrate through direct interactions (38, 41). Sequence specificity of poly(A) addition reflects the RNA binding specificities of the two stimulatory factors: CPSF recruits the polymerase to RNAs containing the AAUAAA sequence in the vicinity of their 3′ ends (24, 42, 43), and PABPN1 recruits the enzyme to substrate RNAs carrying a terminal oligo(A) tract (29). Each factor alone endows the polymerase with modest processivity, such that it can incorporate maybe two to five nucleotides before dissociating (44). RNAs containing both the AAUAAA sequence and an oligo(A) tail and thus resembling intermediates of the polyadenylation reaction support a cooperative or synergistic stimulation of poly(A) polymerase by both CPSF and PABPN1. Under these conditions, addition of the poly(A) tail occurs in a processive manner, i.e. without intermittent dissociation of the protein complex from its substrate RNA (29, 44).Interestingly, the reconstituted polyadenylation reaction also shows proper length control, generating poly(A) tails of the same length as seen in vivo; tails grow to a relatively well defined length of 250–300 nucleotides in a rapid, processive reaction (29, 44). Length control is due to termination of this processive elongation; extension beyond 250 A residues is largely distributive and therefore slow (45). These kinetics of in vitro poly(A) tail synthesis are fully consistent with the in vivo kinetics derived from pulse-labeling studies (46). In vitro, poly(A) tail elongation rates beyond 250 A residues are similar when either CPSF or PABPN1 or both are present. In other words, substrates with long poly(A) tails no longer support the cooperative stimulation of poly(A) polymerase by both CPSF and PABPN1 that is the basis of processive elongation (45). The termination of processive elongation must be mediated by a change in the RNA-protein complex that remains to be defined. When RNAs carrying poly(A) tails of different lengths are used as substrates for polyadenylation, the tails are always elongated processively to 250 nucleotides, independently of the initial length, whereas extension of a tail of 250 or more nucleotides in length is slow and distributive from the start of the reaction. Thus, poly(A) tail length control is based on some kind of AMP residue counting or length measurement, not on a kinetic mechanism (45).In this paper, we address the two problems outlined above: first, how does the polyadenylation complex change to terminate processive poly(A) tail elongation, and second, how is the length of the tail measured? We provide evidence that PABPN1 is the active component in the mechanism of length control. The protein promotes the interaction between CPSF and poly(A) polymerase when bound to a short poly(A) tail. PABPN1 no longer promotes or even actively disrupts this interaction when bound to a poly(A) tail of 250 nucleotides or longer and thereby terminates the cooperative, processive elongation reaction in a poly(A) tail length-dependent manner. Only poly(A) sequences are counted as part of the tail. Because this reflects the binding specificity of PABPN1 and because disruption of the CPSF-poly(A) polymerase interaction requires complete coverage of the poly(A) tail by this protein, PABPN1 is also the protein that measures the length of the tail.     

Poly(A)-Containing Messenger Ribonucleoprotein Complexes from Sea Urchin Eggs and Embryos: Polypeptides Associated with Native and UV-Crosslinked mRNPs

Abstract. Fertilization of sea urchin eggs results in the rapid recruitment of stored messages into polyribosomes. Whether translational control in sea urchin eggs is mediated by macromolecules associated with the stored messages remains unknown, since preparations of messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes (mRNPs) were active in protein synthesis in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate. To facilitate the study of mRNPs, chromatography on oligo(dT)-cellulose was used to purify poly(A)-containing mRNPs from eggs and embryos of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus . Nonpolyribosomal mRNPs purified from eggs had a similar sedimentation in sucrose to unpurified mRNPs, a peak buoyant density in metrizamide of 1.22 g/cm³, and peak buoyant densities in Cs₂SO₄ in 1.42 g/cm³ after fixation with glutaraldehyde and 1.46 g/cm³ without fixation. Nonpolyribosomal mRNPs from eggs and zygotes contained 5–10 major proteins on sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gels, and numerous minor bands. UV-irradiation of living eggs of the sea urchin Arbacia punctulata produced cross-linked mRNPs which contained a similar pattern of polypeptides to noncross-linked mRNPs. The polypeptides associated with embyronic polyribosomal mRNPs were also qualitatively similar to those present in nonpolyribosomal mRNPs, although stoichiometric differences may exist.     

Structure of the N-terminal Mlp1-binding domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA-binding protein, Nab2

Nuclear abundant poly(A) RNA-binding protein 2 (Nab2) is an essential yeast heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein that modulates both mRNA nuclear export and poly(A) tail length. The N-terminal domain of Nab2 (residues 1-97) mediates interactions with both the C-terminal globular domain of the nuclear pore-associated protein, myosin-like protein 1 (Mlp1), and the mRNA export factor, Gfd1. The solution and crystal structures of the Nab2 N-terminal domain show a primarily helical fold that is analogous to the PWI fold found in several other RNA-binding proteins. In contrast to other PWI-containing proteins, we find no evidence that the Nab2 N-terminal domain binds to nucleic acids. Instead, this domain appears to mediate protein:protein interactions that facilitate the nuclear export of mRNA. The Nab2 N-terminal domain has a distinctive hydrophobic patch centered on Phe73, consistent with this region of the surface being a protein:protein interaction site. Engineered mutations within this hydrophobic patch attenuate the interaction with the Mlp1 C-terminal domain but do not alter the interaction with Gfd1, indicating that this patch forms a crucial component of the interface between Nab2 and Mlp1.     

Tristetraprolin Inhibits Poly(A)-Tail Synthesis in Nuclear mRNA that Contains AU-Rich Elements by Interacting with Poly(A)-Binding Protein Nuclear 1

Background

Tristetraprolin binds mRNA AU-rich elements and thereby facilitates the destabilization of mature mRNA in the cytosol.

Methodology/Principal Findings

To understand how tristetraprolin mechanistically functions, we biopanned with a phage-display library for proteins that interact with tristetraprolin and retrieved, among others, a fragment of poly(A)-binding protein nuclear 1, which assists in the 3''-polyadenylation of mRNA by binding to immature poly(A) tails and thereby increases the activity of poly(A) polymerase, which is directly responsible for polyadenylation. The tristetraprolin/poly(A)-binding protein nuclear 1 interaction was characterized using tristetraprolin and poly(A)-binding protein nuclear 1 deletion mutants in pull-down and co-immunoprecipitation assays. Tristetraprolin interacted with the carboxyl-terminal region of poly(A)-binding protein nuclear 1 via its tandem zinc finger domain and another region. Although tristetraprolin and poly(A)-binding protein nuclear 1 are located in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus, they interacted in vivo in only the nucleus. In vitro, tristetraprolin bound both poly(A)-binding protein nuclear 1 and poly(A) polymerase and thereby inhibited polyadenylation of AU-rich element–containing mRNAs encoding tumor necrosis factor α, GM-CSF, and interleukin-10. A tandem zinc finger domain–deleted tristetraprolin mutant was a less effective inhibitor. Expression of a tristetraprolin mutant restricted to the nucleus resulted in downregulation of an AU-rich element–containing tumor necrosis factor α/luciferase mRNA construct.

Conclusion/Significance

In addition to its known cytosolic mRNA–degrading function, tristetraprolin inhibits poly(A) tail synthesis by interacting with poly(A)-binding protein nuclear 1 in the nucleus to regulate expression of AU-rich element–containing mRNA.     

A Role for the Poly(A)-binding Protein Pab1p in PUF Protein-mediated Repression

PUF proteins regulate translation and mRNA stability throughout eukaryotes. Using a cell-free translation assay, we examined the mechanisms of translational repression of PUF proteins in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We demonstrate that the poly(A)-binding protein Pab1p is required for PUF-mediated translational repression for two distantly related PUF proteins: S. cerevisiae Puf5p and Caenorhabditis elegans FBF-2. Pab1p interacts with oligo(A) tracts in the HO 3′-UTR, a target of Puf5p, to dramatically enhance the efficiency of Puf5p repression. Both the Pab1p ability to activate translation and interact with eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) were required to observe maximal repression by Puf5p. Repression was also more efficient when Pab1p was bound in close proximity to Puf5p. Puf5p may disrupt translation initiation by interfering with the interaction between Pab1p and eIF4G. Finally, we demonstrate two separable mechanisms of translational repression employed by Puf5p: a Pab1p-dependent mechanism and a Pab1p-independent mechanism.     

Poly(A)-binding proteins: Structure, domain organization, and activity regulation

RNA-binding proteins are of vital importance for mRNA functioning. Among these, poly(A)-binding proteins (PABPs) are of special interest due to their participation in virtually all mRNA-dependent events that is caused by their high affinity for A-rich mRNA sequences. Apart from mRNAs, PABPs interact with many proteins, thus promoting their involvement in cellular events. In the nucleus, PABPs play a role in polyadenylation, determine the length of the poly(A) tail, and may be involved in mRNA export. In the cytoplasm, they participate in regulation of translation initiation and either protect mRNAs from decay through binding to their poly(A) tails or stimulate this decay by promoting mRNA inter-actions with deadenylase complex proteins. This review presents modern notions of the role of PABPs in mRNA-dependent events; peculiarities of regulation of PABP amount in the cell and activities are also discussed.     

Disease Resistance in Plants that Carry a Feedback-regulated Yeast Poly(A) Binding Protein Gene

It has been reported that the expression of the yeast poly(A) binding protein gene (PAB1) in plants leads to an induction of disease resistance responses, accompanied by alterations in the growth habit of the plant (Li et al. Plant Mol. Biol. (2000) 42 335). To capitalize on this observation, a feedback-regulated PAB1 gene was assembled and introduced into tobacco and Arabidopsis. The regulation entailed the linking of the expression of the PAB1 gene to control by the lac repressor, and by linking lac repressor expression to the disease resistance state of the plant, such that the induction of systemic defense responses by accumulation of the yeast poly(A) binding protein would turn off the expression of the PAB1 gene. Plants containing this system showed elevated and/or constitutive expression of disease-associated genes and significant resistance to otherwise pathogenic organisms. As well, they displayed a nearly normal growth habit under laboratory and greenhouse settings. These studies indicate that the expression of cytotoxic genes (such as the PAB1 gene) in plants can be controlled so that enhanced disease resistance can be achieved without significantly affecting plant growth and development. Balasubrahmanyam Addepalli, Ruqiang Xu :These authors contributed equally to this work     

Postfertilization Poly(A) · Protein Complex Formation on Sea Urchin Maternal Messenger RNA

A two-fold increase in polyadenylate [poly(A)] content occurs between fertilization and the two-cell stage in sea urchin zygotes. In this report the role of this cytoplasmic polyadenylation process in the provision of binding sites for poly(A)-associated proteins during early development of Lytechinus pictus is evaluated. Protein-associated poly(A) sequences, from ribonuclease-treated, post-mitochondrial supernatants of various developmental stages, were collected by nitrocellulose filtration and quantified by ³H-poly(U) complex formation. The proportion of protein-associated poly(A) rose from about 27% to about 60% of the total poly(A), on a nucleotide basis, during the period between fertilization and the eight-cell stage. However, the actual increase in number of poly(A) sequences associated with protein was more extensive, about 2.5-fold, since protein-associated poly(A) sequences average about 45 nucleotides longer than free poly(A). The protein-associated poly(A) of eggs and zygotes is found in two types of protease-sensitive complexes which sediment at 8–12 S and 15–20 S. The 8–12 S complex appears to be selectively increased in amount following fertilization. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the poly(A) protein complex fraction indicates the presence of 87,000 and 130,000 molecular weight polypeptides in both eggs and zygotes. It is concluded that quantitative, but not qualitative, alterations in the proportion of protein-associated poly(A) accompanies post-fertilization cytoplasmic polyadenylation in sea urchin zygotes. The attachment of specific proteins to the 3'terminus of maternal RNAs may be involved in their subsequent activities during early embryogenesis.     

Translation of the Chloroplast psbA mRNA Requires the Nuclear-encoded Poly(A)-binding Protein,RB47

A set of nuclear mutants of C. reinhardtii were identified that specifically lack translation of the chloroplast-encoded psbA mRNA, which encodes the photosystem II reaction center polypeptide D1. Two of these mutants are deficient in the 47-kD member (RB47) of the psbA RNA-binding complex, which has previously been identified both genetically and biochemically as a putative translational activator of the chloroplast psbA mRNA. RB47 is a member of the poly(A)-binding protein family, and binds with high affinity and specificity to the 5′ untranslated region of the psbA mRNA. The results presented here confirm RB47''s role as a message-specific translational activator in the chloroplast, and bring together genetic and biochemical data to form a cohesive model for light- activated translational regulation in the chloroplast.