In Vitro and In Vivo Biology of Recombinant Adenovirus Vectors with E1, E1/E2A,or E1/E4 Deleted

Isogenic, E3-deleted adenovirus vectors defective in E1, E1 and E2A, or E1 and E4 were generated in complementation cell lines expressing E1, E1 and E2A, or E1 and E4 and characterized in vitro and in vivo. In the absence of complementation, deletion of both E1 and E2A completely abolished expression of early and late viral genes, while deletion of E1 and E4 impaired expression of viral genes, although at a lower level than the E1/E2A deletion. The in vivo persistence of these three types of vectors was monitored in selected strains of mice with viral genomes devoid of transgenes to exclude any interference by immunogenic transgene-encoded products. Our studies showed no significant differences among the vectors in the short-term maintenance and long-term (4-month) persistence of viral DNA in liver and lung cells of immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice. Furthermore, all vectors induced similar antibody responses and comparable levels of adenovirus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. These results suggest that in the absence of transgenes, the progressive deletion of the adenovirus genome does not extend the in vivo persistence of the transduced cells and does not reduce the antivirus immune response. In addition, our data confirm that, in the absence of transgene expression, mouse cellular immunity to viral antigens plays a minor role in the progressive elimination of the virus genome.Replication-deficient human adenoviruses (Ad) have been widely investigated as ex vivo and in vivo gene delivery systems for human gene therapy. The ability of these vectors to mediate the efficient expression of candidate therapeutic or vaccine genes in a variety of cell types, including postmitotic cells, is considered an advantage over other gene transfer vectors (3, 28, 49). However, the successful application of currently available E1-defective Ad vectors in human gene therapy has been hampered by the fact that transgene expression is only transient in vivo (2, 15, 16, 33, 36, 46). This short-lived in vivo expression of the transgene has been explained, at least in part, by the induction in vivo of cytotoxic immune responses to cells infected with the Ad vector. Studies with rodent systems have suggested that cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) directed against virus antigens synthesized de novo in the transduced tissues play a major role in eliminating cells containing the E1-deleted viral genome (56–58, 61). Consistent with the concept of cellular antiviral immunity, expression of transgenes is significantly extended in experimental rodent systems that are deficient in various components of the cellular immune system or that have been rendered immunocompromised by administration of pharmacological agents (2, 33, 37, 48, 60, 64).Based on the assumption that further reduction of viral antigen expression may lower the immune response and thus extend persistence of transgene expression, previous studies have investigated the consequences of deleting both E1 and an additional viral regulatory region, such as E2A or E4. The E2A region encodes a DNA binding protein (DBP) with specific affinity for single-stranded Ad DNA. The DNA binding function is essential for the initiation and elongation of viral DNA synthesis during the early phase of Ad infection. During the late phase of infection, DBP plays a central role in the activation of the major late promoter (MLP) (for a recent review, see reference 44). The E4 region, located at the right end of the viral genome, encodes several regulatory proteins with pleiotropic functions which are involved in the accumulation, splicing, and transport of early and late viral mRNAs, in DNA replication, and in virus particle assembly (reviewed in reference 44). The simultaneous deletion of E1 and E2A or of E1 and E4 should therefore further reduce the replication of the virus genome and the expression of early and late viral genes. Such multidefective vectors have been generated and tested in vitro and in vivo (9, 12, 17, 19–21, 23, 24, 26, 34, 40, 52, 53, 59, 62, 63). Recombinant vectors with E1 deleted and carrying an E2A temperature-sensitive mutation (E2Ats) have been shown in vitro to express much smaller amounts of virus proteins, leading to extended transgene expression in cotton rats and mice (19, 20, 24, 59). To eliminate the risks of reversion of the E2Ats point mutation to a wild-type phenotype, improved vectors with both E1 and E2A deleted were subsequently generated in complementation cell lines coexpressing E1 and E2A genes (26, 40, 63). In vitro analysis of human cells infected by these viruses demonstrated that the double deletion completely abolished viral DNA replication and late protein synthesis (26). Similarly, E1/E4-deleted vectors have been generated in various in vitro complementation systems and tested in vitro and in vivo (9, 17, 23, 45, 52, 53, 62). These studies showed that deletion of both E1 and E4 did indeed reduce significantly the expression of early and late virus proteins (17, 23), leading to a decreased anti-Ad host immune response (23), reduced hepatotoxicity (17, 23, 52), and improved in vivo persistence of the transduced liver cells (17, 23, 52).Interpretation of these results is difficult, however, since all tested E1- and E1/E4-deleted vectors encoded the bacterial β-galactosidase (βgal) marker, whose strong immunogenicity is known to influence the in vivo persistence of Ad-transduced cells (32, 37). Moreover, the results described above are not consistent with the conclusions from other studies showing, in various immunocompetent mouse models, that cellular immunity to Ad antigens has no detectable impact on the persistence of the transduced cells (37, 40, 50, 51). Furthermore, in contrast to results of earlier studies (19, 20, 59), Fang et al. (21) demonstrated that injection of E1-deleted/E2Ats vectors into immunocompetent mice and hemophilia B dogs did not lead to an improvement of the persistence of transgene expression compared to that with isogenic E1-deleted vectors. Similarly, Morral et al. (40) did not observe any difference in persistence of transgene expression in mice injected with either vectors deleted in E1 only or vectors deleted in both E1 and E2A. Finally, the demonstration that some E4-encoded products can modulate transgene expression (1, 17, 36a) makes the evaluation of E1- and E1/E4-deleted vectors even more complex when persistence of transgene expression is used for direct comparison of the in vivo persistence of cells transduced by the two types of vectors.The precise influence of the host immune response to viral antigens on the in vivo persistence of the transduced cells, and hence the impact of further deletions in the virus genome, therefore still remains unclear. To investigate these questions, we generated a set of isogenic vectors with single deletions (AdE1°) and double deletions (AdE1°E2A° and AdE1°E4°) and their corresponding complementation cell lines and compared the biologies and immunogenicities of these vectors in vitro and in vivo. To eliminate any possible influence of transgene-encoded products on the interpretation of the in vivo results, we used E1-, E1/E2A-, and E1/E4-deleted vectors with no transgenes.     

PTIP Regulates 53BP1 and SMC1 at the DNA Damage Sites

Although PTIP is implicated in the DNA damage response, through interactions with 53BP1, the function of PTIP in the DNA damage response remain elusive. Here, we show that RNF8 controls DNA damage-induced nuclear foci formation of PTIP, which in turn regulates 53BP1 localization to the DNA damage sites. In addition, SMC1, a substrate of ATM, could not be phosphorylated at the DNA damage sites in the absence of PTIP. The PTIP-dependent pathway is important for DNA double strand breaks repair and DNA damage-induced intra-S phase checkpoint activation. Taken together, these results suggest that the role of PTIP in the DNA damage response is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1. Thus, PTIP regulates 53BP1-dependent signaling pathway following DNA damage.The DNA damage response pathways are signal transduction pathways with DNA damage sensors, mediators, and effectors, which are essential for maintaining genomic stability (1–3). Following DNA double strand breaks, histone H2AX at the DNA damage sites is rapidly phosphorylated by ATM/ATR/DNAPK (4–10), a family homologous to phosphoinositide 3-kinases (11, 12). Subsequently, phospho-H2AX (γH2AX) provides the platform for accumulation of a larger group of DNA damage response factors, such as MDC1, BRCA1, 53BP1, and the MRE11·RAD50·NBS1 complex (13, 14), at the DNA damage sites. Translocalization of these proteins to the DNA double strand breaks (DSBs)³ facilitates DNA damage checkpoint activation and enhances the efficiency of DNA damage repair (14, 15).Recently, PTIP (Pax2 transactivation domain-interacting protein, or Paxip) has been identified as a DNA damage response protein and is required for cell survival when exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) (1, 16–18). PTIP is a 1069-amino acid nuclear protein and has been originally identified in a yeast two-hybrid screening as a partner of Pax2 (19). Genetic deletion of the PTIP gene in mice leads to early embryonic lethality at embryonic day 8.5, suggesting that PTIP is essential for early embryonic development (20). Structurally, PTIP contains six tandem BRCT (BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal) domains (16–18, 21). The BRCT domain is a phospho-group binding domain that mediates protein-protein interactions (17, 22, 23). Interestingly, the BRCT domain has been found in a large number of proteins involved in the cellular response to DNA damages, such as BRCA1, MDC1, and 53BP1 (7, 24–29). Like other BRCT domain-containing proteins, upon exposure to IR, PTIP forms nuclear foci at the DSBs, which is dependent on its BRCT domains (16–18). By protein affinity purification, PTIP has been found in two large complexes. One includes the histone H3K4 methyltransferase ALR and its associated cofactors, the other contains DNA damage response proteins, including 53BP1 and SMC1 (30, 31). Further experiments have revealed that DNA damage enhances the interaction between PTIP and 53BP1 (18, 31).To elucidate the DNA damage response pathways, we have examined the upstream and downstream partners of PTIP. Here, we report that PTIP is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1 in response to DNA damage. Moreover, PTIP and 53BP1 are required for the phospho-ATM association with the chromatin, which phosphorylates SMC1 at the DSBs. This PTIP-dependent pathway is involved in DSBs repair.     

Sip1, a Novel RS Domain-Containing Protein Essential for Pre-mRNA Splicing

Previous studies have shown that protein-protein interactions among splicing factors may play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing. We report here identification and functional characterization of a new splicing factor, Sip1 (SC35-interacting protein 1). Sip1 was initially identified by virtue of its interaction with SC35, a splicing factor of the SR family. Sip1 interacts with not only several SR proteins but also with U1-70K and U2AF65, proteins associated with 5′ and 3′ splice sites, respectively. The predicted Sip1 sequence contains an arginine-serine-rich (RS) domain but does not have any known RNA-binding motifs, indicating that it is not a member of the SR family. Sip1 also contains a region with weak sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator suppressor of white apricot (SWAP). An essential role for Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing was suggested by the observation that anti-Sip1 antibodies depleted splicing activity from HeLa nuclear extract. Purified recombinant Sip1 protein, but not other RS domain-containing proteins such as SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, restored the splicing activity of the Sip1-immunodepleted extract. Addition of U2AF65 protein further enhanced the splicing reconstitution by the Sip1 protein. Deficiency in the formation of both A and B splicing complexes in the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract indicates an important role of Sip1 in spliceosome assembly. Together, these results demonstrate that Sip1 is a novel RS domain-containing protein required for pre-mRNA splicing and that the functional role of Sip1 in splicing is distinct from those of known RS domain-containing splicing factors.Pre-mRNA splicing takes place in spliceosomes, the large RNA-protein complexes containing pre-mRNA, U1, U2, U4/6, and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), and a large number of accessory protein factors (for reviews, see references 21, 22, 37, 44, and 48). It is increasingly clear that the protein factors are important for pre-mRNA splicing and that studies of these factors are essential for further understanding of molecular mechanisms of pre-mRNA splicing.Most mammalian splicing factors have been identified by biochemical fractionation and purification (3, 15, 19, 31–36, 45, 69–71, 73), by using antibodies recognizing splicing factors (8, 9, 16, 17, 61, 66, 67, 74), and by sequence homology (25, 52, 74).Splicing factors containing arginine-serine-rich (RS) domains have emerged as important players in pre-mRNA splicing. These include members of the SR family, both subunits of U2 auxiliary factor (U2AF), and the U1 snRNP protein U1-70K (for reviews, see references 18, 41, and 59). Drosophila alternative splicing regulators transformer (Tra), transformer 2 (Tra2), and suppressor of white apricot (SWAP) also contain RS domains (20, 40, 42). RS domains in these proteins play important roles in pre-mRNA splicing (7, 71, 75), in nuclear localization of these splicing proteins (23, 40), and in protein-RNA interactions (56, 60, 64). Previous studies by us and others have demonstrated that one mechanism whereby SR proteins function in splicing is to mediate specific protein-protein interactions among spliceosomal components and between general splicing factors and alternative splicing regulators (1, 1a, 6, 10, 27, 63, 74, 77). Such protein-protein interactions may play critical roles in splice site recognition and association (for reviews, see references 4, 18, 37, 41, 47 and 59). Specific interactions among the splicing factors also suggest that it is possible to identify new splicing factors by their interactions with known splicing factors.Here we report identification of a new splicing factor, Sip1, by its interaction with the essential splicing factor SC35. The predicted Sip1 protein sequence contains an RS domain and a region with sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator, SWAP. We have expressed and purified recombinant Sip1 protein and raised polyclonal antibodies against the recombinant Sip1 protein. The anti-Sip1 antibodies specifically recognize a protein migrating at a molecular mass of approximately 210 kDa in HeLa nuclear extract. The anti-Sip1 antibodies sufficiently deplete Sip1 protein from the nuclear extract, and the Sip1-depleted extract is inactive in pre-mRNA splicing. Addition of recombinant Sip1 protein can partially restore splicing activity to the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract, indicating an essential role of Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing. Other RS domain-containing proteins, including SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, cannot substitute for Sip1 in reconstituting splicing activity of the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract. However, addition of U2AF65 further increases splicing activity of Sip1-reconstituted nuclear extract, suggesting that there may be a functional interaction between Sip1 and U2AF65 in nuclear extract.     

Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Printor, a Novel TorsinA-interacting Protein Implicated in Dystonia Pathogenesis

Early onset generalized dystonia (DYT1) is an autosomal dominant neurological disorder caused by deletion of a single glutamate residue (torsinA ΔE) in the C-terminal region of the AAA⁺ (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) protein torsinA. The pathogenic mechanism by which torsinA ΔE mutation leads to dystonia remains unknown. Here we report the identification and characterization of a 628-amino acid novel protein, printor, that interacts with torsinA. Printor co-distributes with torsinA in multiple brain regions and co-localizes with torsinA in the endoplasmic reticulum. Interestingly, printor selectively binds to the ATP-free form but not to the ATP-bound form of torsinA, supporting a role for printor as a cofactor rather than a substrate of torsinA. The interaction of printor with torsinA is completely abolished by the dystonia-associated torsinA ΔE mutation. Our findings suggest that printor is a new component of the DYT1 pathogenic pathway and provide a potential molecular target for therapeutic intervention in dystonia.Early onset generalized torsion dystonia (DYT1) is the most common and severe form of hereditary dystonia, a movement disorder characterized by involuntary movements and sustained muscle spasms (1). This autosomal dominant disease has childhood onset and its dystonic symptoms are thought to result from neuronal dysfunction rather than neurodegeneration (2, 3). Most DYT1 cases are caused by deletion of a single glutamate residue at positions 302 or 303 (torsinA ΔE) of the 332-amino acid protein torsinA (4). In addition, a different torsinA mutation that deletes amino acids Phe³²³–Tyr³²⁸ (torsinA Δ323–328) was identified in a single family with dystonia (5), although the pathogenic significance of this torsinA mutation is unclear because these patients contain a concomitant mutation in another dystonia-related protein, ϵ-sarcoglycan (6). Recently, genetic association studies have implicated polymorphisms in the torsinA gene as a genetic risk factor in the development of adult-onset idiopathic dystonia (7, 8).TorsinA contains an N-terminal endoplasmic reticulum (ER)³ signal sequence and a 20-amino acid hydrophobic region followed by a conserved AAA⁺ (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) domain (9, 10). Because members of the AAA⁺ family are known to facilitate conformational changes in target proteins (11, 12), it has been proposed that torsinA may function as a molecular chaperone (13, 14). TorsinA is widely expressed in brain and multiple other tissues (15) and is primarily associated with the ER and nuclear envelope (NE) compartments in cells (16–20). TorsinA is believed to mainly reside in the lumen of the ER and NE (17–19) and has been shown to bind lamina-associated polypeptide 1 (LAP1) (21), lumenal domain-like LAP1 (LULL1) (21), and nesprins (22). In addition, recent evidence indicates that a significant pool of torsinA exhibits a topology in which the AAA⁺ domain faces the cytoplasm (20). In support of this topology, torsinA is found in the cytoplasm, neuronal processes, and synaptic terminals (2, 3, 15, 23–26) and has been shown to bind cytosolic proteins snapin (27) and kinesin light chain 1 (20). TorsinA has been proposed to play a role in several cellular processes, including dopaminergic neurotransmission (28–31), NE organization and dynamics (17, 22, 32), and protein trafficking (27, 33). However, the precise biological function of torsinA and its regulation remain unknown.To gain insights into torsinA function, we performed yeast two-hybrid screens to search for torsinA-interacting proteins in the brain. We report here the isolation and characterization of a novel protein named printor (protein interactor of torsinA) that interacts selectively with wild-type (WT) torsinA but not the dystonia-associated torsinA ΔE mutant. Our data suggest that printor may serve as a cofactor of torsinA and provide a new molecular target for understanding and treating dystonia.     

Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.     

Algorithms for Finding Small Attractors in Boolean Networks

A Boolean network is a model used to study the interactions between different genes in genetic regulatory networks. In this paper, we present several algorithms using gene ordering and feedback vertex sets to identify singleton attractors and small attractors in Boolean networks. We analyze the average case time complexities of some of the proposed algorithms. For instance, it is shown that the outdegree-based ordering algorithm for finding singleton attractors works in time for , which is much faster than the naive time algorithm, where is the number of genes and is the maximum indegree. We performed extensive computational experiments on these algorithms, which resulted in good agreement with theoretical results. In contrast, we give a simple and complete proof for showing that finding an attractor with the shortest period is NP-hard.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Multipattern Consensus Regions in Multiple Aligned Protein Sequences and Their Segmentation

Decomposing a biological sequence into its functional regions is an important prerequisite to understand the molecule. Using the multiple alignments of the sequences, we evaluate a segmentation based on the type of statistical variation pattern from each of the aligned sites. To describe such a more general pattern, we introduce multipattern consensus regions as segmented regions based on conserved as well as interdependent patterns. Thus the proposed consensus region considers patterns that are statistically significant and extends a local neighborhood. To show its relevance in protein sequence analysis, a cancer suppressor gene called p53 is examined. The results show significant associations between the detected regions and tendency of mutations, location on the 3D structure, and cancer hereditable factors that can be inferred from human twin studies.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]     

Analysis of Non-canonical Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1) Interaction Reveals Regulatory and Activating Domains of Neurofascin

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are important for many different mechanisms, including cell migration, proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Here, we show a new link between FGFR1 and the cell adhesion molecule neurofascin, which is important for neurite outgrowth. After overexpression in HEK293 cells, embryonal neurofascin isoform NF166 was able to associate with FGFR1, whereas the adult isoform NF186, differing from NF166 in additional extracellular sequences, was deficient. Pharmacological inhibitors and overexpression of dominant negative components of the FGFR signaling pathway pointed to the activation of FGFR1 after association with neurofascin in neurite outgrowth assays in chick tectal neurons and rat PC12-E2 cells. Both extra- and intracellular domains of embryonal neurofascin isoform NF166 were able to form complexes with FGFR1 independently. However, the cytosolic domain was both necessary and sufficient for the activation of FGFR1. Cytosolic serine residues 56 and 100 were shown to be essential for the neurite outgrowth-promoting activity of neurofascin, whereas both amino acid residues were dispensable for FGFR1 association. In conclusion, the data suggest a neurofascin intracellular domain, which activates FGFR1 for neurite outgrowth, whereas the extracellular domain functions as an additional, regulatory FGFR1 interaction domain in the course of development.The four known fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs),² which are targeted by a large family of 22 fibroblast growth factor ligands, represent a highly diverse signaling system important for migration, proliferation, differentiation, and survival of many different cell types (1, 2). fibroblast growth factor activation of FGFR leads to the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), and phospholipase Cγ (PLCγ), depending on the cellular system under study. Non-canonical FGFR interactions with NCAM, cadherins, and syndecan via extracellular domains were also described (1). However, the contribution of intracellular interactions of FGFR1 with further membrane co-receptors is poorly understood. Only cytosolic interaction between FGFRs and EphA4 have been described that are involved in mutual transphosphorylation (3).The cell adhesion molecule neurofascin is important for cell-cell communication in the nervous system (4, 5). Neurofascin regulates many different functions in the brain, suggesting that it functions as a key regulator for both developing and differentiated neural cells. Different alternatively spliced neurofascin isoforms are expressed in different cells and at different times of development (6). Embryonal neurofascin NF166 is important for neurite outgrowth and guidance (7, 8). Recently, a role for neurofascin NF166 for early processes of inhibitory synaptogenesis at the axon hillock and for the positioning of inhibitory synapses at the axon initial segment has been proven (9, 10).In the more developed nervous system, NF166 is replaced by NF186, which is inhibitory for neurite outgrowth (11). NF186 is linked to the cortical actin cytoskeleton via ankyrin_G (12). Clustering of voltage-gated sodium channels both at axon initial segments and at the nodes of Ranvier is conferred by neurofascin NF186 (13, 14). A further cytosolic interaction partner is the PDZ molecule syntenin-1 (15).Despite the well known functional importance of neurofascin in the nervous system, corresponding signaling pathways have not been investigated. In contrast, signaling by the related molecules NCAM and L1 have been studied with regard to the induction of neurite outgrowth in greater detail (for a review, see Refs. 16–18). Both NCAM and L1 induce neurite outgrowth through activation of FGFR1 (19–23). NCAM may further undergo lateral interactions with PrP (prion precursor protein) or GFRα, which is part of the glia-derived neurotrophic factor receptor (24, 25). In addition to FGFR1 interaction, both L1 and NCAM are connected to non-receptor tyrosine kinases. However, whereas NCAM employs the non-receptor kinase c-Fyn as an upstream component, L1 is linked to c-Src (26, 27). L1 converges with NCAM signaling upstream of the MAPK pathway at the level of Raf (18, 21, 28, 29). NCAM may induce alternative signaling pathways, including protein kinase A-dependent signaling or G-proteins (18, 30). NCAM signaling to the nucleus may include activation of CREB and c-Fos or NF-κB (29, 31, 32).Here, we elucidate the molecular mechanisms of neurofascin-FGFR1 interaction for neurite outgrowth. We show that both cytosolic and the extracellular domains are important for the association of FGFR1 with neurofascin. Although the cytosolic domain represents a critical determinant for FGFR1 activation, the extracellular sequences of neurofascin act as a regulator for FGFR1-dependent signal transduction in the course of development.