Characterization of the Activation of Membrane-Bound and Soluble CF(1) by Thioredoxin

The activation of spinach (Spinacia oleracea) chloroplast coupling factor 1 (CF₁) by thioredoxin (ThR) was characterized using membrane-bound and soluble CF₁. Light generates an electrochemical proton gradient across the thylakoid membrane, which increases the accessibility of the disulfide bond on the γ-subunit of CF₁ to reduced ThR. The proton gradient substantially accelerates the activation of CF₁ compared with thylakoids incubated in the dark with similar concentrations of dithiothreitol and ThR. The interaction of soluble CF₁ with ThR was studied using fluorescent probes. CF₁ in solution, with and without its associated ε-subunit, was labeled at Cys-322 of the γ-subunit with fluoresceinyl maleimide. ThR from Escherichia coli was labeled with eosin isothiocyanate. Labeled ThR and CF₁ showed normal activities. Fluorescence energy transfer between donor fluoresceinyl maleimide and acceptor eosin isothiocyanate, manifested by a quenching of the donor fluorescence, was detected, suggesting that ThR and CF₁ form an intermolecular complex. When the ε-subunit was absent, quenching of donor fluorescence was approximately doubled, indicating that labeled ThR could approach more closely to the γ-subunit of CF₁. The distance between the fluorescent probes on CF₁ and ThR was calculated to be approximately 65 Å when ε-subunit was present and 52 Å when ε was absent. These values are consistent with other distance measurements and energy transfer values reported previously for fluorescent probes on CF₁. Whereas the extent of quenching increased by removal of the ε-subunit, the apparent dissociation constant was unchanged. The quenching effect was reversed when the ε-subunit was added back to the titration mixture. Similarly, the addition of unlabeled ThR decreased donor quenching.     

The depletion of F1 subunit ε in yeast leads to an uncoupled respiratory phenotype that is rescued by mutations in the proton-translocating subunits of F0

The central stalk of the ATP synthase is an elongated hetero-oligomeric structure providing a physical connection between the catalytic sites in F₁ and the proton translocation channel in F₀ for energy transduction between the two subdomains. The shape of the central stalk and relevance to energy coupling are essentially the same in ATP synthases from all forms of life, yet the protein composition of this domain changed during evolution of the mitochondrial enzyme from a two- to a three-subunit structure (γ, δ, ε). Whereas the mitochondrial γ- and δ-subunits are homologues of the bacterial central stalk proteins, the deliberate addition of subunit ε is poorly understood. Here we report that down-regulation of the gene (ATP15) encoding the ε-subunit rapidly leads to lethal F₀-mediated proton leaks through the membrane because of the loss of stability of the ATP synthase. The ε-subunit is thus essential for oxidative phosphorylation. Moreover, mutations in F₀ subunits a and c, which slow the proton translocation rate, are identified that prevent ε-deficient ATP synthases from dissipating the electrochemical potential. Cumulatively our data lead us to propose that the ε-subunit evolved to permit operation of the central stalk under the torque imposed at the normal speed of proton movement through mitochondrial F₀.     

Single-molecule Study on the Temperature-sensitive Reaction of F1-ATPase with a Hybrid F1 Carrying a Single ��(E190D)

F₁-ATPase is a rotary molecular motor in which the γ-subunit rotates against the α₃β₃ cylinder. The unitary γ-rotation is a 120° step comprising 80 and 40° substeps, each of these initiated by ATP binding and ADP release and by ATP hydrolysis and inorganic phosphate release, respectively. In our previous study on γ-rotation at low temperatures, a highly temperature-sensitive (TS) reaction step of F₁-ATPase from thermophilic Bacillus PS3 was found below 9 °C as an intervening pause before the 80° substep at the same angle for ATP binding and ADP release. However, it remains unclear as to which reaction step the TS reaction corresponds. In this study, we found that the mutant F₁(βE190D) from thermophilic Bacillus PS3 showed a clear pause of the TS reaction below 18 °C. In an attempt to identify the catalytic state of the TS reaction, the rotation of the hybrid F₁, carrying a single copy of βE190D, was observed at 18 °C. The hybrid F₁ showed a pause of the TS reaction at the same angle as for the ATP binding of the incorporated βE190D, although kinetic analysis revealed that the TS reaction is not the ATP binding step. These findings suggest that the TS reaction is a structural rearrangement of β before or after ATP binding.F₁-ATPase (F₁)² is an ATP-driven rotary motor protein. The subunit composition of the bacterial F₁-ATPase is α₃β₃γδϵ, and the minimum complex of F₁-ATPase as a rotary motor is α₃β₃γ subcomplex. This motor protein forms the F_oF₁-ATP synthase complex by binding to another rotary motor, namely, F_o, which is driven by the proton flux resulting from the proton motive force across the membranes (1–4). Under physiological conditions, where the proton motive force is sufficiently large, F_o forcibly rotates F₁-ATPase in the reverse direction of F₁-ATPase, leading the reverse reaction of ATP hydrolysis, i.e. ATP synthesis from ADP and inorganic phosphate (P_i). When the proton motive force diminishes or F₁ is isolated from F_o, F₁-ATPase hydrolyzes ATP to rotate the γ-subunit against the α₃β₃ stator ring in the counterclockwise direction as viewed from the F_o side (5). The catalytic sites are located at the interface of the α- and β-subunits, predominantly on the β-subunit (6). Each β-subunit carries out a single turnover of ATP hydrolysis during the γ-rotation of 360° following the common catalytic reaction pathway, whereas they are 120° different in the catalytic phase. In this manner, the three β-subunits undergo different reaction steps of ATP hydrolysis upon each rotational step. The rotary motion of the γ-subunit has been demonstrated by biochemical (7) and spectroscopic methods (8) and directly proved in single-molecule observation studies (5).Since the establishment of the single-molecule rotation assay, the chemomechanical coupling scheme of F₁ has been studied extensively by resolving the rotation into discrete steps. The stepping rotation was first observed under an ATP-limiting condition where F₁ makes discrete 120° steps upon ATP binding (9). Then, high speed imaging of the rotation with a small probe of low friction was performed, which revealed that the 120° step comprises 80 and 40° substeps, each initiated by ATP binding, and two unknown consecutive reactions, respectively (10). This finding necessitated the identification of the two reactions that trigger the 40° substep. Hence, the rotation assay was performed using a mutant, namely F₁(βE190D), and a slowly hydrolyzed ATP analog, namely ATPγS (11). Glutamate 190 of the β-subunit of F₁, derived from thermophilic Bacillus PS3 and the corresponding glutamates from other F₁-ATPases (Glu-181 of F₁ from Escherichia coli and Glu-188 of F₁ from bovine mitochondria), has been identified as one of the most critical catalytic residues for ATP hydrolysis (6, 12–15). When this glutamate was substituted with aspartic acid, which has a shorter side chain than that of glutamate, the ATP cleavage step of F₁ was drastically slowed. In the rotation assay, this mutant showed a distinct long pause before the 40° substep. ATPγS also caused a long pause before the 40° substep. These observations established that the 40° substep is initiated by hydrolysis. Accordingly, the pause angles before the 80 and 40° substeps are referred to as to the binding angle and the catalytic angle, respectively. Then, the rotation assay was performed in the presence of a high amount of P_i in the solution. It was shown that P_i rebinding caused the long pause at the catalytic angle, suggesting that P_i is released before the 40° substep (16).However, the reaction scheme of F₁ cannot be established by simply assigning each reaction step to either the binding angle or the catalytic angle, because each reaction step must be assigned to one of the three binding or catalytic angles when considering the 360° cyclic reaction scheme of each β-subunit. Direct information about the timing of ADP release was obtained by simultaneous imaging of fluorescently labeled nucleotides and γ rotation, which showed that each β retains ADP until the γ rotates 240° after binding of the nucleotide as ATP and releases ADP between 240 and 320° (16, 17). Another powerful approach is the use of a hybrid F₁ carrying a mutant β that causes a characteristic pause during the rotation. In a previous study, the hybrid F₁ carrying a single copy of β(E190D), α₃β₂β(E190D)γ, showed a distinct pause caused by the slow hydrolysis of β(E190D) at +200° from the ATP binding angle of the mutant β (18). From this observation, it was confirmed that each β executes the chemical cleavage of the bound ATP at +200° from the angle where the ATP binds to β. The asymmetric feature of the pause of the hybrid F₁ was also utilized in other experiments as a marker in the rotational trajectory to correlate the rotational angle and the conformational state of β (19) or to determine the state of F₁ in the crystal structures as the pausing state at catalytic angle (20).Recently, we have found a new reaction intermediate of F₁ rotation as a clear intervening pause before the 80° substep in the rotation assay below 9 °C (21). Furuike et al. (22) also observed the TS reaction in a high speed imaging experiment. The rate constant of this reaction was remarkably sensitive to temperature, giving a Q₁₀ factor around 19. When ADP was added to solution, the pause before the 80° substep was prolonged, whereas the solution P_i caused a longer pause before the 40° substep (21). Although this result can be explained by assuming that the temperature-sensitive (TS) reaction is ADP release, it was not decisive for the identification of the TS reaction.In this study, we found that the mutant F₁(βE190D) also exhibits the distinct pause of the TS reaction but at a higher temperature than for the wild-type F₁, i.e. at 18 °C. This feature was advantageous in identifying the angle position of the TS reaction in the catalytic cycle for each β-subunit coupled with the 360° rotation. Taking advantage of the feature of the hybrid F₁, we analyzed the rotational behavior of the hybrid F₁ at 18 °C in order to assign the angle position of the TS reaction in the catalytic cycle of the 360° rotation, and we have shown that the TS reaction is not directly involved in the ADP release but in some conformational rearrangement before or after ATP binding step.     

Accommodating Discontinuities in Dimeric Left-Handed Coiled Coils in ATP Synthase External Stalks

ATP synthases from coupling membranes are complex rotary motors that convert the energy of proton gradients across coupling membranes into the chemical potential of the β-γ anhydride bond of ATP. Proton movement within the ring of c subunits localized in the F₀-sector drives γ and ɛ rotation within the F₁α₃β₃ catalytic core where substrates are bound and products are released. An external stalk composed of homodimeric subunits b₂ in Escherichia coli or heterodimeric bb′ in photosynthetic synthases connects F₀ subunit a with F₁ subunits δ and most likely α. The external stalk resists rotation, and is of interest both functionally and structurally. Hypotheses that the external stalk contributes to the overall efficiency of the reaction through elastic coupling of rotational substeps, and that stalks form staggered, right-handed coiled coils, are investigated here. We report on different structures that accommodate heptad discontinuities with either local or global underwinding. Analyses of the knob-and-hole packing of the E. coli b₂ and Synechocystis bb′ stalks strongly support the possibility that these proteins can adopt conventional left-handed coiled coils.     

The amino-terminus of nitric oxide sensitive guanylyl cyclase α₁ does not affect dimerization but influences subcellular localization

Background

Nitric oxide sensitive guanylyl cyclase (NOsGC) is a heterodimeric enzyme formed by an α- and a β₁-subunit. A splice variant (C-α₁) of the α₁-subunit, lacking at least the first 236 amino acids has been described by Sharina et al. 2008 and has been shown to be expressed in differentiating human embryonic cells. Wagner et al. 2005 have shown that the amino acids 61–128 of the α₁-subunit are mandatory for quantitative heterodimerization implying that the C-α₁-splice variant should lose its capacity to dimerize quantitatively.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In the current study we demonstrate preserved quantitative dimerization of the C-α₁-splice by co-purification with the β₁-subunit. In addition we used fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) based on fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) using fusion proteins of the β₁-subunit and the α₁-subunit or the C-α₁ variant with ECFP or EYFP. Analysis of the respective combinations in HEK-293 cells showed that the fluorescence lifetime was significantly shorter (≈0.3 ns) for α₁/β₁ and C-α₁/β₁ than the negative control. In addition we show that lack of the amino-terminus in the α₁ splice variant directs it to a more oxidized subcellular compartment.

Conclusions/Significance

We conclude that the amino-terminus of the α₁-subunit is dispensable for dimerization in-vivo and ex-vivo, but influences the subcellular trafficking.     

Protein Kinase C-α Interaction with F0F1-ATPase Promotes F0F1-ATPase Activity and Reduces Energy Deficits in Injured Renal Cells

We showed previously that active PKC-α maintains F₀F₁-ATPase activity, whereas inactive PKC-α mutant (dnPKC-α) blocks recovery of F₀F₁-ATPase activity after injury in renal proximal tubules (RPTC). This study tested whether mitochondrial PKC-α interacts with and phosphorylates F₀F₁-ATPase. Wild-type PKC-α (wtPKC-α) and dnPKC-α were overexpressed in RPTC to increase their mitochondrial levels, and RPTC were exposed to oxidant or hypoxia. Mitochondrial levels of the γ-subunit, but not the α- and β-subunits, were decreased by injury, an event associated with 54% inhibition of F₀F₁-ATPase activity. Overexpressing wtPKC-α blocked decreases in γ-subunit levels, maintained F₀F₁-ATPase activity, and improved ATP levels after injury. Deletion of PKC-α decreased levels of α-, β-, and γ-subunits, decreased F₀F₁-ATPase activity, and hindered the recovery of ATP content after RPTC injury. Mitochondrial PKC-α co-immunoprecipitated with α-, β-, and γ-subunits of F₀F₁-ATPase. The association of PKC-α with these subunits decreased in injured RPTC overexpressing dnPKC-α. Immunocapture of F₀F₁-ATPase and immunoblotting with phospho(Ser) PKC substrate antibody identified phosphorylation of serine in the PKC consensus site on the α- or β- and γ-subunits. Overexpressing wtPKC-α increased phosphorylation and protein levels, whereas deletion of PKC-α decreased protein levels of α-, β-, and γ-subunits of F₀F₁-ATPase in RPTC. Phosphoproteomics revealed phosphorylation of Ser¹⁴⁶ on the γ subunit in response to wtPKC-α overexpression. We concluded that active PKC-α 1) prevents injury-induced decreases in levels of γ subunit of F₀F₁-ATPase, 2) interacts with α-, β-, and γ-subunits leading to increases in their phosphorylation, and 3) promotes the recovery of F₀F₁-ATPase activity and ATP content after injury in RPTC.     

Molecular Basis for Zinc Transporter 1 Action as an Endogenous Inhibitor of L-type Calcium Channels

The L-type calcium channel (LTCC) has a variety of physiological roles that are critical for the proper function of many cell types and organs. Recently, a member of the zinc-regulating family of proteins, ZnT-1, was recognized as an endogenous inhibitor of the LTCC, but its mechanism of action has not been elucidated. In the present study, using two-electrode voltage clamp recordings in Xenopus oocytes, we demonstrate that ZnT-1-mediated inhibition of the LTCC critically depends on the presence of the LTCC regulatory β-subunit. Moreover, the ZnT-1-induced inhibition of the LTCC current is also abolished by excess levels of the β-subunit. An interaction between ZnT-1 and the β-subunit, as demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation and by fluorescence resonance energy transfer, is consistent with this result. Using surface biotinylation and total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy in HEK293 cells, we show a ZnT-1-dependent decrease in the surface expression of the pore-forming α₁-subunit of the LTCC. Similarly, a decrease in the surface expression of the α₁-subunit is observed following up-regulation of the expression of endogenous ZnT-1 in rapidly paced cultured cardiomyocytes. We conclude that ZnT-1-mediated inhibition of the LTCC is mediated through a functional interaction of ZnT-1 with the LTCC β-subunit and that it involves a decrease in the trafficking of the LTCC α₁-subunit to the surface membrane.     

One rotary mechanism for F1-ATPase over ATP concentrations from millimolar down to nanomolar

F₁-ATPase is a rotary molecular motor in which the central γ-subunit rotates inside a cylinder made of α₃β₃-subunits. The rotation is driven by ATP hydrolysis in three catalytic sites on the β-subunits. How many of the three catalytic sites are filled with a nucleotide during the course of rotation is an important yet unsettled question. Here we inquire whether F₁ rotates at extremely low ATP concentrations where the site occupancy is expected to be low. We observed under an optical microscope rotation of individual F₁ molecules that carried a bead duplex on the γ-subunit. Time-averaged rotation rate was proportional to the ATP concentration down to 200 pM, giving an apparent rate constant for ATP binding of 2 × 10⁷ M⁻¹s⁻¹. A similar rate constant characterized bulk ATP hydrolysis in solution, which obeyed a simple Michaelis-Menten scheme between 6 mM and 60 nM ATP. F₁ produced the same torque of ~40 pN·nm at 2 mM, 60 nM, and 2 nM ATP. These results point to one rotary mechanism governing the entire range of nanomolar to millimolar ATP, although a switchover between two mechanisms cannot be dismissed. Below 1 nM ATP, we observed less regular rotations, indicative of the appearance of another reaction scheme.     

The regulatory C-terminal domain of subunit ε of F₀F₁ ATP synthase is dispensable for growth and survival of Escherichia coli

The C-terminal domain of subunit ε of the bacterial F_oF₁ ATP synthase is reported to be an intrinsic inhibitor of ATP synthesis/hydrolysis activity in vitro, preventing wasteful hydrolysis of ATP under low-energy conditions. Mutants defective in this regulatory domain exhibited no significant difference in growth rate, molar growth yield, membrane potential, or intracellular ATP concentration under a wide range of growth conditions and stressors compared to wild-type cells, suggesting this inhibitory domain is dispensable for growth and survival of Escherichia coli.F_oF₁ ATP synthases are ubiquitous enzymes that synthesize ATP using a transmembrane electrochemical potential of protons or proton motive force (PMF) generated by the respiratory chain across the cytoplasmic membrane of bacteria, the thylakoid membrane of chloroplasts, or the mitochondrial inner membrane (4, 5, 37). The enzyme consists of two parts: membrane-embedded F_o subcomplex (a complex of subunits a, b, and c in bacteria) and hydrophilic F₁ subcomplex (composed of subunits α, β, γ, δ, and ε). The enzyme is also known as a molecular motor, which is composed of the stator subcomplex (α, β, δ, a, and b) and the rotor subcomplex (γ, ε, and c), and its rotation is coupled to ATP synthesis and proton flow across the membrane (20, 31, 52). The reaction of the enzyme is reversible; ATP is hydrolyzed into ADP and inorganic phosphate, the rotor subcomplex rotates in reverse, and protons are extruded to the periplasmic side, resulting in the generation of PMF. Although some bacteria utilize the reverse reaction under particular conditions, the primary function of F_oF₁ ATP synthase is generation of ATP from the PMF. Therefore, the direction of the activity of F_oF₁ ATP synthase is regulated to avoid wasteful ATP hydrolysis.Subunit ε in bacterial F_oF₁ has been known to be an intrinsic inhibitor of F₁ and F_oF₁ complex (18, 21, 23) and is proposed to have a regulatory function (10, 11, 42). Although the inhibitory effects of subunit ε vary among species, in general, ε inhibits ATP hydrolysis activity while repressing ATP synthesis activity to a lesser degree (14, 27). This regulatory function of the ε subunit is mediated almost exclusively by the C-terminal region of ε, which is comprised of two antiparallel α-helices (18, 49, 50). Biochemical and crystallographic studies have revealed that the C-terminal helices can adopt two different conformations (34, 46, 47, 48). In the retracted conformation, the α-helices form a hairpin-like structure and sit on the N-terminal β-sandwich domain of the ε subunit. When the ε subunit exhibits an inhibitory effect, it adopts a more extended conformation in which the C-terminal α-helices extend along the γ subunit, which composes the central stalk. It has also been shown that basic, positively charged residues on the second α-helix of the ε subunit interact with negatively charged residues in the DELSEED segment of subunit β to exert the inhibitory effect (12).Escherichia coli mutants deleted in the entire ε subunit exhibit a reduced growth rate and growth yield, and this effect is proposed to be a result of a deficiency in assembly of the F_o and F₁ complexes (21). The N-terminal β-sandwich domain of the ε subunit is responsible for the assembly of F_o and F₁ and is therefore important for efficient coupling between proton translocation through F_o and ATP synthesis/hydrolysis in F₁ (15, 39). Deletion of the ε subunit leads to dissociation of the F_oF₁ complex and wasteful ATP hydrolysis by free (cytoplasmic) F₁ and dissipation of PMF through free F_o (21, 22, 51).While the importance of the entire ε subunit in the whole-cell physiology of E. coli is fairly well established, the role of the regulatory C-terminal region of ε has received little attention and warrants investigation to determine if the regulatory functions (e.g., inhibition of ATP hydrolysis) observed in vitro are manifested in the physiology of E. coli under various growth conditions. To address this question, we constructed isogenic E. coli mutants that were deleted in the C-terminal region of ε subunit (ε^DC) and used these strains to compare physiological properties of wild-type versus ε^DC cells under a wide range of environmental conditions and stressors.     

ATP Synthase with Its �� Subunit Reduced to the N-terminal Helix Can Still Catalyze ATP Synthesis

ATP synthase uses a unique rotary mechanism to couple ATP synthesis and hydrolysis to transmembrane proton translocation. As part of the synthesis mechanism, the torque of the rotor has to be converted into conformational rearrangements of the catalytic binding sites on the stator to allow synthesis and release of ATP. The γ subunit of the rotor, which plays a central role in the energy conversion, consists of two long helices inside the central cavity of the stator cylinder plus a globular portion outside the cylinder. Here, we show that the N-terminal helix alone is able to fulfill the function of full-length γ in ATP synthesis as long as it connects to the rest of the rotor. This connection can occur via the ϵ subunit. No direct contact between γ and the c ring seems to be required. In addition, the results indicate that the ϵ subunit of the rotor exists in two different conformations during ATP synthesis and ATP hydrolysis.F₁F_o-ATP synthase is responsible for the bulk of ATP synthesis from ADP and P_i in most organisms. F₁F_o-ATP synthase consists of the membrane-embedded F_o subcomplex with, in most bacteria, a subunit composition of ab₂c_n (with n = 10–15) and the peripheral F₁ subcomplex, with a subunit composition of α₃β₃γδϵ. The energy necessary for ATP synthesis is derived from an electrochemical transmembrane proton (or, in some organisms, sodium ion) gradient. Proton flow, down the gradient, through F_o is coupled to ATP synthesis on F₁ by a unique rotary mechanism. The protons flow through channels at the interface of a and c subunits, which drives rotation of the ring of c subunits. The c_n ring, together with F₁ subunits γ and ϵ, forms the rotor. Rotation of γ leads to conformational changes in the catalytic nucleotide-binding sites on the β subunits, where ADP and P_i are bound. The conformational changes result in formation and release of ATP. Thus, ATP synthase converts electrochemical energy, the proton gradient, into mechanical energy in the form of subunit rotation and back into chemical energy as ATP. In bacteria, under certain physiological conditions, the process can run in reverse. ATP is hydrolyzed to generate a transmembrane proton gradient that the bacterium requires for such functions as nutrient import and locomotion (for reviews, see Refs. 1–6).F₁ (or “F₁-ATPase”) has three catalytic nucleotide-binding sites, located on the β subunits, at the interface with the adjacent α subunit. The catalytic sites have pronounced differences in their nucleotide-binding affinity. During rotational catalysis, the sites switch their affinities in a synchronized manner; the position of γ determines which catalytic site is the high affinity site (K_d1 in the nanomolar range), which site is the medium affinity site (K_d2 ≈ 1 μm), and which site is the low affinity site (K_d3 ≈ 30–100 μm; see Refs. 7, 8). Only the high affinity site is catalytically active (9). In the original crystal structure of bovine mitochondrial F₁ (10), one of the three catalytic sites was filled with the ATP analog AMPPNP,³ a second one with ADP (plus azide; see Ref. 11), and the third site was empty. Hence, the β subunits are referred to as β_TP, β_DP, and β_E, respectively. The high affinity site is located on the β_TP subunit (12).The coupling process between ATP synthesis or hydrolysis on β and rotation of γ is not yet fully understood on a residue level. A number of point mutations at the interfaces between α or β and γ and between γ, ϵ, and c have been described that result in varying degrees of uncoupling (13–17). Some mutations at these interfaces were found that abolish ATP synthesis or hydrolysis activity or both (18–20). Considering the pronounced effect of these point mutations, some of which were even conservative substitutions, it came as a surprise when it was recently shown that an “axle-less” γ, consisting just of the globular portion, with the portions of the N- and C-terminal helices that reach into the α₃β₃ cylinder removed, displayed ATP-driven rotation in the correct direction (21).Some reports have implicated the ϵ subunit (corresponding to the δ subunit in the mitochondrial enzyme) as being involved in coupling (15, 22–25). It was shown that ϵ exists in different conformations that vary in the folding and positioning of the C-terminal domain. The x-ray structure of the mitochondrial enzyme (26) shows the two helices of the C-terminal domain folded back on each other like a hairpin and positioned close to the interface between γ and the c ring (“down” conformation). In the crystal structure of a γϵ complex from Escherichia coli the hairpin is unfolded (27); when integrated into F₁ or F₁F_o, the C terminus would reach “up,” coming close to the DELSEED-loop of the α and/or β subunits. While in this up conformation the angle between both helices of the C-terminal domain of ϵ is ∼90°, it has been postulated that this domain might also exist in a fully extended up conformation, stretching close to the N terminus of γ, with helical regions replacing the turn between the two helices (28). Fixing ϵ in either up conformation by cross-linking to γ has been shown to impair ATP hydrolysis but not synthesis. Freezing ϵ in the down position inhibited neither reaction (29, 30).Here, we report a finding that is arguably just as surprising as the rotation of an axle-less γ. In ATP synthase from the thermophilic bacterium Bacillus PS3, enzymes with γ subunit constructs where the globular domain and the C-terminal helix were eliminated, consisting of just the N-terminal 35 or 42 residues, TF₁F_o(γQ36stop)⁴ and TF₁F_o(γP43stop), were able to catalyze significant rates of ATP synthesis. According to the crystal structure (26), the shorter of the two γ constructs should not make any contact either with c or with ϵ in the down conformation. Thus, the fact that ATP synthesis was observed suggests that ϵ in an up conformation forms a complex with the truncated γ, which is able to catalyze ATP synthesis. Indeed, when the γQ36stop truncation was combined with an ϵ truncation where the C-terminal domain was removed, ATP synthesis was abolished. The functions of the γ and ϵ subunits will be discussed in light of the new findings.     

Mechanism of Inhibition by C-terminal α-Helices of the ? Subunit of Escherichia coli FoF1-ATP Synthase

The ϵ subunit of bacterial F_oF₁-ATP synthase (F_oF₁), a rotary motor protein, is known to inhibit the ATP hydrolysis reaction of this enzyme. The inhibitory effect is modulated by the conformation of the C-terminal α-helices of ϵ, and the “extended” but not “hairpin-folded” state is responsible for inhibition. Although the inhibition of ATP hydrolysis by the C-terminal domain of ϵ has been extensively studied, the effect on ATP synthesis is not fully understood. In this study, we generated an Escherichia coli F_oF₁ (EF_oF₁) mutant in which the ϵ subunit lacked the C-terminal domain (F_oF₁^ϵΔC), and ATP synthesis driven by acid-base transition (ΔpH) and the K⁺-valinomycin diffusion potential (ΔΨ) was compared in detail with that of the wild-type enzyme (F_oF₁^ϵWT). The turnover numbers (k_cat) of F_oF₁^ϵWT were severalfold lower than those of F_oF₁^ϵΔC. F_oF₁^ϵWT showed higher Michaelis constants (K_m). The dependence of the activities of F_oF₁^ϵWT and F_oF₁^ϵΔC on various combinations of ΔpH and ΔΨ was similar, suggesting that the rate-limiting step in ATP synthesis was unaltered by the C-terminal domain of ϵ. Solubilized F_oF₁^ϵWT also showed lower k_cat and higher K_m values for ATP hydrolysis than the corresponding values of F_oF₁^ϵΔC. These results suggest that the C-terminal domain of the ϵ subunit of EF_oF₁ slows multiple elementary steps in both the ATP synthesis/hydrolysis reactions by restricting the rotation of the γ subunit.     

The Role of the ��DELSEED-loop of ATP Synthase

ATP synthase uses a unique rotational mechanism to convert chemical energy into mechanical energy and back into chemical energy. The helix-turn-helix motif, termed “DELSEED-loop,” in the C-terminal domain of the β subunit was suggested to be involved in coupling between catalysis and rotation. Here, the role of the DELSEED-loop was investigated by functional analysis of mutants of Bacillus PS3 ATP synthase that had 3–7 amino acids within the loop deleted. All mutants were able to catalyze ATP hydrolysis, some at rates several times higher than the wild-type enzyme. In most cases ATP hydrolysis in membrane vesicles generated a transmembrane proton gradient, indicating that hydrolysis occurred via the normal rotational mechanism. Except for two mutants that showed low activity and low abundance in the membrane preparations, the deletion mutants were able to catalyze ATP synthesis. In general, the mutants seemed less well coupled than the wild-type enzyme, to a varying degree. Arrhenius analysis demonstrated that in the mutants fewer bonds had to be rearranged during the rate-limiting catalytic step; the extent of this effect was dependent on the size of the deletion. The results support the idea of a significant involvement of the DELSEED-loop in mechanochemical coupling in ATP synthase. In addition, for two deletion mutants it was possible to prepare an α₃β₃γ subcomplex and measure nucleotide binding to the catalytic sites. Interestingly, both mutants showed a severely reduced affinity for MgATP at the high affinity site.F₁F₀-ATP synthase catalyzes the final step of oxidative phosphorylation and photophosphorylation, the synthesis of ATP from ADP and inorganic phosphate. F₁F₀-ATP synthase consists of the membrane-embedded F₀ subcomplex, with, in most bacteria, a subunit composition of ab₂c₁₀, and the peripheral F₁ subcomplex, with a subunit composition of α₃β₃γδε. The energy necessary for ATP synthesis is derived from an electrochemical transmembrane proton (or, in some organisms, a sodium ion) gradient. Proton flow down the gradient through F₀ is coupled to ATP synthesis on F₁ by a unique rotary mechanism. The protons flow through (half) channels at the interface of the a and c subunits, which drives rotation of the ring of c subunits. The c₁₀ ring, together with F₁ subunits γ and ε, forms the rotor. Rotation of γ leads to conformational changes in the catalytic nucleotide binding sites on the β subunits, where ADP and P_i are bound. The conformational changes result in the formation and release of ATP. Thus, ATP synthase converts electrochemical energy, the proton gradient, into mechanical energy in the form of subunit rotation and back into chemical energy as ATP. In bacteria, under certain physiological conditions, the process runs in reverse. ATP is hydrolyzed to generate a transmembrane proton gradient, which the bacterium requires for such functions as nutrient import and locomotion (for reviews, see Refs. 1–6).F₁ (or F₁-ATPase) has three catalytic nucleotide binding sites located on the β subunits at the interface to the adjacent α subunit. The catalytic sites have pronounced differences in their nucleotide binding affinity. During rotational catalysis, the sites switch their affinities in a synchronized manner; the position of γ determines which catalytic site is the high affinity site (K_d1 in the nanomolar range), which site is the medium affinity site (K_d2 ≈ 1 μm), and which site is the low affinity site (K_d3 ≈ 30–100 μm; see Refs. 7 and 8). In the original crystal structure of bovine mitochondrial F₁ (9), one of the three catalytic sites, was filled with the ATP analog AMP-PNP,² a second was filled with ADP (plus azide) (see Ref. 10), and the third site was empty. Hence, the β subunits are referred to as β_TP, β_DP, and β_E. The occupied β subunits, β_TP and β_DP, were in a closed conformation, and the empty β_E subunit was in an open conformation. The main difference between these two conformations is found in the C-terminal domain. Here, the “DELSEED-loop,” a helix-turn-helix structure containing the conserved DELSEED motif, is in an “up” position when the catalytic site on the respective β subunit is filled with nucleotide and in a “down” position when the site is empty (Fig. 1A). When all three catalytic sites are occupied by nucleotide, the previously open β_E subunit assumes an intermediate, half-closed (β_HC) conformation. It cannot close completely because of steric clashes with γ (11).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.The βDELSEED-loop. A, interaction of the β_TP and β_E subunits with theγ subunit.β subunits are shown in yellow andγ in blue. The DELSEED-loop (shown in orange, with the DELSEED motif itself in green)of β_TP interacts with the C-terminal helixγ and the short helix that runs nearly perpendicular to the rotation axis. The DELSEED-loop of β_E makes contact with the convex portion of γ, formed mainly by the N-terminal helix. A nucleotide molecule (shown in stick representation) occupies the catalytic site of β_TP, and the subunit is in the closed conformation. The catalytic site on β_E is empty, and the subunit is in the open conformation. This figure is based on Protein Data Bank file 1e79 (32). B, deletions in the βDELSEED-loop. The loop was “mutated” in silico to represent the PS3 ATP synthase. The 3–4-residue segments that are removed in the deletion mutants are color-coded as follows: ³⁸⁰LQDI³⁸³, pink; ³⁸⁴IAIL³⁸⁷, green; ³⁸⁸GMDE³⁹¹, yellow; ³⁹²LSD³⁹⁴, cyan; ³⁹⁵EDKL³⁹⁸, orange; ³⁹⁹VVHR⁴⁰², blue. Residues that are the most involved in contacts with γ are labeled. All figures were generated using the program PyMOL (DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA).The DELSEED-loop of each of the three β subunits makes contact with the γ subunit. In some cases, these contacts consist of hydrogen bonds or salt bridges between the negatively charged residues of the DELSEED motif and positively charged residues on γ. The interactions of the DELSEED-loop with γ, its movement during catalysis, the conservation of the DELSEED motif (see 12–14). Thus, the finding that an AALSAAA mutant in the α₃β₃γ complex of ATP synthase from the thermophilic Bacillus PS3, where several hydrogen bonds/salt bridges to γ are removed simultaneously, could drive rotation of γ with the same torque as the wild-type enzyme (14) came as a surprise. On the other hand, it seems possible that it is the bulk of the DELSEED-loop, more so than individual interactions, that drives rotation of γ. According to a model favored by several authors (6, 15, 16) (see also Refs. 17–19), binding of ATP (or, more precisely, MgATP) to the low affinity catalytic site on β_E and the subsequent closure of this site, accompanied by its conversion into the high affinity site, are responsible for driving the large (80–90°) rotation substep during ATP hydrolysis, with the DELSEED-loop acting as a “pushrod.” A recent molecular dynamics (20) study supports this model and implicates mainly the region around several hydrophobic residues upstream of the DELSEED motif (specifically βI386 and βL387)³ as being responsible for making contact with γ during the large rotation substep.

TABLE 1

Conservation of residues in the DELSEED-loop Amino acids found in selected species in the turn region of the DELSEED-loop. Listed are all positions subjected to deletions in the present study. Residue numbers refer to the PS3 enzyme. Consensus annotation: p, polar residue; s, small residue; h, hydrophobic residue; –, negatively charged residue; +, positively charged residue.Open in a separate windowIn the present study, we investigated the function of the DELSEED-loop using an approach less focused on individual residues, by deleting stretches of 3–7 amino acids between positions β380 and β402 of ATP synthase from the thermophilic Bacillus PS3. We analyzed the functional properties of the deletion mutants after expression in Escherichia coli. The mutants showed ATPase activities, which were in some cases surprisingly high, severalfold higher than the activity of the wild-type control. On the other hand, in all cases where ATP synthesis could be measured, the rates where below or equal to those of the wild-type enzyme. In Arrhenius plots, the hydrolysis rates of the mutants were less temperature-dependent than those of wild-type ATP synthase. In those cases where nucleotide binding to the catalytic sites could be tested, the deletion mutants had a much reduced affinity for MgATP at high affinity site 1. The functional role of the DELSEED-loop will be discussed in light of the new information.     

Identification of a Novel Isoform of the Chloroplast-Coupling Factor α-Subunit

Studies were conducted to identify a 64-kD thylakoid membrane protein of unknown function. The protein was extracted from chloroplast thylakoids under low ionic strength conditions and purified to homogeneity by preparative sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Four peptides generated from the proteolytic cleavage of the wheat 64-kD protein were sequenced and found to be identical to internal sequences of the chloroplast-coupling factor (CF₁) α-subunit. Antibodies for the 64-kD protein also recognized the α-subunit of CF₁. Both the 64-kD protein and the 61-kD CF₁ α-subunit were present in the monocots barley (Hordeum vulgare), maize (Zea mays), oat (Avena sativa), and wheat (Triticum aestivum); but the dicots pea (Pisum sativum), soybean (Glycine max Merr.), and spinach (Spinacia oleracea) contained only a single polypeptide corresponding to the CF₁ α-subunit. The 64-kD protein accumulated in response to high irradiance (1000 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹) and declined in response to low irradiance (80 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹) treatments. Thus, the 64-kD protein was identified as an irradiance-dependent isoform of the CF₁ α-subunit found only in monocots. Analysis of purified CF₁ complexes showed that the 64-kD protein represented up to 15% of the total CF₁ α-subunit.     

Temperature Dependence of Single Molecule Rotation of the Escherichia coli ATP Synthase F1 Sector Reveals the Importance of ��-�� Subunit Interactions in the Catalytic Dwell

The temperature-dependent rotation of F₁-ATPase γ subunit was observed in V_max conditions at low viscous drag using a 60-nm gold bead (Nakanishi-Matsui, M., Kashiwagi, S., Hosokawa, H., Cipriano, D. J., Dunn, S. D., Wada, Y., and Futai, M. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 4126–4131). The Arrhenius slopes of the speed of the individual 120° steps and reciprocal of the pause length between rotation steps were very similar, indicating a flat energy pathway followed by the rotationally coupled catalytic cycle. In contrast, the Arrhenius slope of the reciprocal pause length of the γM23K mutant F₁ was significantly increased, whereas that of the rotation rate was similar to wild type. The effects of the rotor γM23K substitution and the counteracting effects of βE381D mutation in the interacting stator subunits demonstrate that the rotor-stator interactions play critical roles in the utilization of stored elastic energy. The γM23K enzyme must overcome an abrupt activation energy barrier, forcing it onto a less favored pathway that results in uncoupling catalysis from rotation.F-ATPase (F_oF₁), consisting of the catalytic sector F₁ (α₃β₃γδϵ) and the transmembrane proton transport sector F_o (ab₂c₁₀), synthesizes or hydrolyzes ATP coupled with proton transport (for reviews, see Ref. 1–6). As Abrahams et al. (7) discovered in the first high resolution x-ray structure, a critical feature of the F₁-ATPase is the inherent asymmetry of the three β subunits in different conformations, β_TP, β_DP, and β_E, referring to the nucleotide bound in each catalytic site, ATP, ADP, or empty, respectively. A rotational mechanism has been firmly established mostly based on direct observation in single molecule experiments of the behavior of the rotor complex ϵγc₁₀, relative to the stator complex α₃β₃δab₂ (reviewed in Ref. 1). ATP hydrolysis-dependent rotation of the γ and ϵ subunits in purified bacterial F₁ (8, 9), the ϵγc₁₀ complex in detergent solubilized F_oF₁ (10–13), and the ϵγc₁₀ complexin F_oF₁ in lipid bilayers (14) were shown experimentally by single molecule observations using fluorescent actin filament as a probe. Relative rotation of the single copy F_o a subunit was also shown in F₀F₁, which was immobilized through the ring of ∼10 c subunits, suggesting that the rotor and stator are interchangeable mechanical units (14). ATP synthesis by F-ATPase is believed to follow the reverse mechanism of ATP hydrolysis because mechanically induced rotation of the γ subunit in immobilized F₁ in the presence of ADP and P_i results in net ATP synthesis (15, 16). There remain many questions about the mechanism of coupling between catalysis and transport via mechanical rotation. In particular, the mechanism of coupling H⁺ transport to rotation of the subunit c₁₀ ring is still not well understood (4).In contrast, there is considerably more information on the mechanism of coupling catalysis to γ and ϵ subunit rotation. Observations of γ subunit rotation in the catalytic F₁ sector are consistent with Boyer''s binding change model (17); thus coupling between the chemistry and rotation can be assessed by studies of the soluble F₁, and these findings relate to the mechanism of the entire ATP synthase complex. The γ subunit rotates relative to the α₃β₃ hexamer in distinct 120° steps. A 120° rotation step consisting of pause and rotation substeps appears to correspond to the hydrolysis of one ATP, assuming that three ATP molecules are hydrolyzed per 360° revolution (18). Additional pauses observed at low ATP concentrations are attributed to the “ATP waiting” dwell (19). Yasuda et al. (19) and Shimabukuro et al. (20) further resolved that each 120° step occurred in two substeps: an 80° substep whose onset was dependent upon the Mg·ATP concentration, and a 40° substep, which was not affected by substrate concentration (19). The pause before the 80° substep, the ATP waiting dwell became shorter with increasing [Mg·ATP]. In contrast, the pause duration before the 40° rotation step was modulated by the slow hydrolysis rate of ATPγS² or by the catalytic site mutant βE190D (in the Bacillus PS3 F₁), which was found to significantly increase the length of the catalytic dwell (20). These data together indicate that the dwell before the 40° step is the “catalytic dwell” (20) and defines the order of the substeps during the 120° rotation step observed in high Mg·ATP concentrations (21).In this paper, we address the question of when the rate-limiting step of steady state catalysis occurs, with respect to the rotational behavior. Pre-steady state analysis of the burst kinetics of ATP hydrolysis at nearly V_max conditions demonstrated that the rate-limiting transition state occurs after the reversible hydrolysis/synthesis step and before release of phosphate (P_i) (22, 23). The rate-limiting step is likely associated with a rotation step because a γ-β cross-linked enzyme is still able to undergo the initial ATP hydrolysis, but the rotation-impeded enzyme is unable to release P_i (23). Significantly, the kinetics of steady state hydrolysis can only be assessed when the Mg·ATP concentration is high enough to fill all three catalytic sites. The only model consistent with these data is one that involves all three catalytic sites. During each 120° catalytic cycle, one site binds ATP, a different site carries out reversible hydrolysis/synthesis, and the third site releases product P_i and ADP (22, 23).Steady state analyses, which take advantage of a particular γ subunit mutation γM23K (24), are consistent with this model. Replacement of the conserved γMet-23 with lysine causes an uncoupling between catalysis and γ subunit rotation caused by altered interactions between γ and β subunits (25). Importantly, Al-Shawi and Nakamoto (26) and Al-Shawi et al. (25, 27) found that the γM23K mutation strongly affected the rate-limiting transition state of steady state ATP hydrolysis and ATP synthesis. The slope of the Arrhenius plots and thus the energy of activation were significantly increased in the mutant enzyme. Several second site suppressor mutations, mostly in the γ subunit (28, 29) but also in the β subunits (30, 31), were genetically identified because they restored coupled ATP synthesis. Significantly, all were in the γ-β interface. Thermodynamic analyses found that the second site suppressors generally compensated for the primary γM23K mutations by reducing the increased activation energy (25, 27, 31). Although most of the second site mutations were found distant from the γM23K site, the x-ray crystal structures (7) suggested that γM23K may directly interact with conserved βGlu-381. As expected, replacement of βGlu-381 with aspartate also suppressed the uncoupling effects of γM23K (31).To identify the rate-limiting transition state step in the rotational behavior, we analyzed the temperature dependence of the γM23K mutant in V_max conditions observed in single molecule experiments. Interestingly, direct observation of this mutant using the micron-length actin filaments did not detect differences in the rotation behavior at room temperature (9). In contrast, we find in the data presented here that there is dramatic effect of the mutation on the temperature dependence of the length of the catalytic dwell or pause between the 120° rotation steps. This is likely because of two factors: first, we used a bead small enough not to invoke a drag on the rotation (32), and second, the temperature dependence of the rate of the rotation steps is critical for the analyses of the mechanism.     

Individual Interactions of the b Subunits within the Stator of the Escherichia coli ATP Synthase

F_OF₁ ATP synthases are rotary nanomotors that couple proton translocation across biological membranes to the synthesis/hydrolysis of ATP. During catalysis, the peripheral stalk, composed of two b subunits and subunit δ in Escherichia coli, counteracts the torque generated by the rotation of the central stalk. Here we characterize individual interactions of the b subunits within the stator by use of monoclonal antibodies and nearest neighbor analyses via intersubunit disulfide bond formation. Antibody binding studies revealed that the C-terminal region of one of the two b subunits is principally involved in the binding of subunit δ, whereas the other one is accessible to antibody binding without impact on the function of F_OF₁. Individually substituted cysteine pairs suitable for disulfide cross-linking between the b subunits and the other stator subunits (b-α, b-β, b-δ, and b-a) were screened and combined with each other to discriminate between the two b subunits (i.e. b_I and b_II). The results show the b dimer to be located at a non-catalytic α/β cleft, with b_I close to subunit α, whereas b_II is proximal to subunit β. Furthermore, b_I can be linked to subunit δ as well as to subunit a. Among the subcomplexes formed were a-b_I-α, b_II-β, α-b_I-b_II-β, and a-b_I-δ. Taken together, the data obtained define the different positions of the two b subunits at a non-catalytic interface and imply that each b subunit has a different role in generating stability within the stator. We suggest that b_I is functionally related to the single b subunit present in mitochondrial ATP synthase.     

Robustness of the Rotary Catalysis Mechanism of F1-ATPase

F₁-ATPase (F₁) is the rotary motor protein fueled by ATP hydrolysis. Previous studies have suggested that three charged residues are indispensable for catalysis of F₁ as follows: the P-loop lysine in the phosphate-binding loop, GXXXXGK(T/S); a glutamic acid that activates water molecules for nucleophilic attack on the γ-phosphate of ATP (general base); and an arginine directly contacting the γ-phosphate (arginine finger). These residues are well conserved among P-loop NTPases. In this study, we investigated the role of these charged residues in catalysis and torque generation by analyzing alanine-substituted mutants in the single-molecule rotation assay. Surprisingly, all mutants continuously drove rotary motion, even though the rotational velocity was at least 100,000 times slower than that of wild type. Thus, although these charged residues contribute to highly efficient catalysis, they are not indispensable to chemo-mechanical energy coupling, and the rotary catalysis mechanism of F₁ is far more robust than previously thought.     

The b Subunits in the Peripheral Stalk of F1F0 ATP Synthase Preferentially Adopt an Offset Relationship

The peripheral stalk of F₁F₀ ATP synthase is essential for the binding of F₁ to F_O and for proper transfer of energy between the two sectors of the enzyme. The peripheral stalk of Escherichia coli is composed of a dimer of identical b subunits. In contrast, photosynthetic organisms express two b-like genes that form a heterodimeric peripheral stalk. Previously we generated chimeric peripheral stalks in which a portion of the tether and dimerization domains of the E. coli b subunits were replaced with homologous sequences from the b and b′ subunits of Thermosynechococcus elongatus (Claggett, S. B., Grabar, T. B., Dunn, S. D., and Cain, B. D. (2007) J. Bacteriol. 189, 5463–5471). The spatial arrangement of the chimeric b and b′ subunits, abbreviated Tb and Tb′, has been investigated by Cu²⁺-mediated disulfide cross-link formation. Disulfide formation was studied both in soluble model polypeptides and between full-length subunits within intact functional F₁F₀ ATP synthase complexes. In both cases, disulfides were preferentially formed between Tb_A83C and Tb′_A90C, indicating the existence of a staggered relationship between helices of the two chimeric subunits. Even under stringent conditions rapid formation of disulfides between these positions occurred. Importantly, formation of this cross-link had no detectable effect on ATP-driven proton pumping, indicating that the staggered conformation is compatible with normal enzymatic activity. Under less stringent reaction conditions, it was also possible to detect b subunits cross-linked through identical positions, suggesting that an in-register, nonstaggered parallel conformation may also exist.F₁F₀ ATP synthases are found in the inner mitochondrial membrane, the thylakoid membrane of chloroplasts, and the cytoplasmic membrane of bacteria (1–4). These enzymes are responsible for harnessing an electrochemical gradient of protons across the membranes for the synthesis of ATP. In Escherichia coli F₁F₀ ATP synthase, the membrane-embedded F₀ sector is composed of subunits ab₂c₁₀ and a soluble F₁ portion composed of subunits α₃β₃γδϵ. The F₀ sector houses a proton channel located principally in the a subunit, and the flow of protons through F₀ generates torque used to rotate the c₁₀ subunit ring relative to the ab₂ subunits. The F₁ γ and ϵ subunits are bound to the c₁₀ ring and form the central or rotor stalk. Catalytic sites are located at the interfaces of each αβ pair in F₁. The γ subunit extends into the center of the α₃β₃ hexamer, creating an asymmetry in the conformations of the αβ pairs (5). It is the rotation of the γ subunit and the resulting sequential conformational changes in each αβ pair that provides the driving force for the synthesis of ATP at the catalytic sites. The α₃β₃ hexamer is held stationary relative to the rotary stalk by the peripheral stalk consisting of the b₂δ subunits.The peripheral stalk is essential for binding F₁ to F₀ and for coupling proton translocation to catalytic activity (6–8). In the E. coli enzyme, the peripheral stalk is a dimer of identical b subunits. The stalk has been conceptually divided into functional domains called the membrane domain (b_M1-I33), the tether domain (b_E34-A61), the dimerization domain (b_T62-K122), and the F₁-binding domain (b_Q123-L156) (9). Although there is ample evidence of direct protein-protein interactions between b subunits within the membrane, dimerization, and F₁-binding domains, there is remarkably little evidence of tight packing between the b subunits in the tether domain. In fact, electron spin resonance studies suggested that the tether domains of the two b subunits may be separated by more than 20 Å in the F₁F₀ complex (10, 11). Much of what is known about the structure of the stalk has been inferred from analysis of the properties of polypeptides modeling segments of the b subunit. The structure of a peptide modeling the membrane domain, b_M1-E34, has been determined by NMR (12), and a peptide based on the dimerization domain, b_T62-K122, has been determined by x-ray diffraction (13). Both polypeptides assumed α-helical conformations, but neither structure directly revealed b subunit dimerization interactions. Recently, Priya et al. (14) reported a low resolution structure of a b_M22-L156 dimer, but the extended conformation appears to be slightly too long to accurately reflect the dimensions of the peripheral stalk within the F₁F₀ complex.Molecular modeling efforts supported by a variety of biochemical and biophysical experiments have yielded competing right-handed coiled coil (15, 16) and left-handed coiled coil (17, 18) models for the peripheral stalk. The parallel two-stranded left-handed coiled coli is a well known structure characterized by knobs-into-holes packing of the side chains of the two helices that are aligned in-register. An in-register conformation implies that any specific amino acid on the b subunit-subunit interface would occupy a position immediately adjacent to its counterpart in the other b subunit. In contrast, del Rizzo et al. (16) proposed a novel parallel right-handed coiled coil with the helices of the two b subunits offset by approximately one and a half turns of an α helix. This staggered model positions the two identical residues contributed by each of the b subunits in a homodimer into differing environments and at considerable distance from one another. Sequence analyses have been offered in support of both models (16, 18). In terms of experimental support, cross-linking studies of polypeptides have provided evidence that dimer packing could be in-register at many sites starting from residue Ala⁵⁹ and continuing to the carboxyl termini in model b_Y24–L156 dimers and in b_D53–K122 dimers (9, 16). Cross-linking at a few of the carboxyl-proximal positions has been confirmed within intact F₁F₀ ATP synthase complexes (19, 20). Recent electron spin resonance distance measurements on b_24–156 have also been interpreted as support for the in-register arrangement (17, 18). Conversely, work with polypeptides modeling the b subunit has generated evidence favoring a staggered conformation in this section of the dimer (15, 16, 21). In mixtures of dimerization domain polypeptides with cysteines incorporated at different sites, disulfides preferentially formed between positions that were 4–7 residues apart. For example, b_D53–L156 dimers were covalently locked into the offset conformation by the formation of disulfide bridges between cysteines introduced at positions b_A79 and b_R83 as well as b_R83 and b_A90 (15). These staggered dimers were more stable, melted with higher cooperativity, and bound soluble F₁ with higher affinity than b_D53–L156 dimers fixed in the in-register arrangement. Moreover, active and coupled F₁F₀ complexes were assembled with heterodimeric peripheral stalks using b subunits with tether domains varying in length by as many as 14 amino acids (22). These F₁F₀ complexes had peripheral stalks that were by definition out of register, at least within the tether domain.In contrast to the homodimer of identical b subunits observed in the peripheral stalk of E. coli, photosynthetic organisms express two b-like subunits, b and b′, that are thought to form heterodimeric peripheral stalks in F₁F₀ ATP synthase. Previously, we generated heterodimeric peripheral stalks within the E. coli F₁F₀ by constructing chimeric b subunits (23). Segments of the tether and dimerization domains of the E. coli b subunit were replaced with the homologous regions of the Thermosynechococcus elongatus b and b′ subunits. The chimeric subunits formed heterodimeric peripheral stalks that were incorporated into intact, functional F₁F₀ ATP synthase complexes. The most active chimeric enzymes had T. elongatus primary sequences replacing residues b_E39–I86 of the E. coli b subunit. For simplicity, these chimeric subunits will be referred to here as Tb and Tb′.The ability to generate F₁F₀ ATP synthases with Tb/Tb′ heterodimeric peripheral stalks provided a means to investigate the positions of the two subunits in the peripheral stalk. In the present work, we show that the Tb and Tb′ subunits assumed preferred positions relative to one another within the F₁F₀ complex. The staggered conformation appears to be a favored and functional conformation for the peripheral stalk. However, within a population of F₁F₀ complexes, some complexes with peripheral stalks in the in-register conformation are likely to exist.     

Isolation and Antigenic Characterization of Corn Mitochondrial F(1)-ATPase

Corn mitochondrial F₁-ATPase was purified from submitochondrial particles by chloroform extraction. Enzyme stored in ammonium sulfate at 4°C was substantially activated by ATP, while enzyme stored at −70°C in 25% glycerol was not. Enzyme in glycerol remained fully active (8-9 micromoles P_i released per minute per milligram), while the ammonium sulfate preparations steadily lost activity over a 2-month storage period. The enzyme was cold labile, and inactived by 4 minutes at 60°C. Treatment with octylglucoside resulted in complete loss of activity, while vanadate had no effect on activity. The apparent subunit molecular weights of corn mitochondrial F₁-ATPase were determined by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to be 58,000 (α), 55,000 (β), 35,000 (γ), 22,000 (δ), and 12,000 (ε). Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies used in competitive binding assays demonstrated that corn mitochondrial F₁-ATPase was antigenically distinct from the chloroplastic CF₁-ATPases of corn and spinach. Monoclonal antibodies against antigenic sites on spinach CF₁-ATPase β and γ subunits were used to demonstrate that those sites were either changed substantially or totally absent from the mitochondrial F₁-ATPase.     

Distances between the b-subunits in the tether domain of F0F1-ATP synthase from E. coli

The arrangement of the b-subunits in the holo-enzyme F₀F₁-ATP synthase from E. coli is investigated by site-directed mutagenesis spin-label EPR. F₀F₁-ATP synthases couple proton translocation with the synthesis of ATP from ADP and phosphate. The hydrophilic F₁-part and the hydrophobic membrane-integrated F₀-part are connected by a central and a peripheral stalk. The peripheral stalk consists of two b-subunits. Cysteine mutations are introduced in the tether domain of the b-subunit at b-40, b-51, b-53, b-62 or b-64 and labeled with a nitroxide spin label. Conventional (9 GHz), high-field (95 GHz) and pulsed EPR spectroscopy reveal: All residues are in a relatively polar environment, with mobilities consistent with helix sites. The distance between the spin labels at each b-subunit is 2.9 nm in each mutant, revealing a parallel arrangement of the two helices. They can be in-register but separated by a large distance (1.9 nm), or at close contact and displaced along the helix axes by maximally 2.7 nm, which excludes an in-register coiled-coil model suggested previously for the b-subunit. Binding of the non-hydrolysable nucleotide AMPPNP to the spin-labeled enzyme had no significant influence on the distances compared to that in the absence of nucleotides.     

Conformational Transitions of Subunit ? in ATP Synthase from Thermophilic Bacillus PS3

Subunit ɛ of bacterial and chloroplast F_OF₁-ATP synthase is responsible for inhibition of ATPase activity. In Bacillus PS3 enzyme, subunit ɛ can adopt two conformations. In the “extended”, inhibitory conformation, its two C-terminal α-helices are stretched along subunit γ. In the “contracted”, noninhibitory conformation, these helices form a hairpin. The transition of subunit ɛ from an extended to a contracted state was studied in ATP synthase incorporated in Bacillus PS3 membranes at 59°C. Fluorescence energy resonance transfer between fluorophores introduced in the C-terminus of subunit ɛ and in the N-terminus of subunit γ was used to follow the conformational transition in real time. It was found that ATP induced the conformational transition from the extended to the contracted state (half-maximum transition extent at 140 μM ATP). ADP could neither prevent nor reverse the ATP-induced conformational change, but it did slow it down. Acid residues in the DELSEED region of subunit β were found to stabilize the extended conformation of ɛ. Binding of ATP directly to ɛ was not essential for the ATP-induced conformational change. The ATP concentration necessary for the half-maximal transition (140 μM) suggests that subunit ɛ probably adopts the extended state and strongly inhibits ATP hydrolysis only when the intracellular ATP level drops significantly below the normal value.