PICK1 is a calcium-sensor for NMDA-induced AMPA receptor trafficking

Regulation of AMPA receptor (AMPAR) trafficking results in changes in receptor number at the postsynaptic membrane, and hence modifications in synaptic strength, which are proposed to underlie learning and memory. NMDA receptor-mediated postsynaptic Ca2+ influx enhances AMPAR internalisation, but the molecular mechanisms that trigger such trafficking are not well understood. We investigated whether AMPAR-associated protein-protein interactions known to regulate receptor surface expression may be directly regulated by Ca2+. PICK1 binds the AMPAR GluR2 subunit and is involved in AMPAR internalisation and LTD. We show that PICK1 is a Ca2+-binding protein, and that PICK1-GluR2 interactions are enhanced by the presence of 15 muM Ca2+. Deletion of an N-terminal acidic domain in PICK1 reduces its ability to bind Ca2+, and renders the GluR2-PICK1 interaction insensitive to Ca2+. Overexpression of this Ca2+-insensitive mutant occludes NMDA-induced AMPAR internalisation in hippocampal neurons. This work reveals a novel postsynaptic Ca2+-binding protein that provides a direct mechanistic link between NMDAR-mediated Ca2+ influx and AMPAR endocytosis.     

PICK1 interacts with ABP/GRIP to regulate AMPA receptor trafficking

PICK1 and ABP/GRIP bind to the AMPA receptor (AMPAR) GluR2 subunit C terminus. Transfer of the receptor from ABP/GRIP to PICK1, facilitated by GluR2 S880 phosphorylation, may initiate receptor trafficking. Here we report protein interactions that regulate these steps. The PICK1 BAR domain interacts intermolecularly with the ABP/GRIP linker II region and intramolecularly with the PICK1 PDZ domain. Binding of PKCalpha or GluR2 to the PICK1 PDZ domain disrupts the intramolecular interaction and facilitates the PICK1 BAR domain association with ABP/GRIP. Interference with the PICK1-ABP/GRIP interaction impairs S880 phosphorylation of GluR2 by PKC and decreases the constitutive surface expression of GluR2, the NMDA-induced endocytosis of GluR2, and recycling of internalized GluR2. We suggest that the PICK1 interaction with ABP/GRIP is a critical step in controlling GluR2 trafficking.     

AMPA receptor tetramerization is mediated by Q/R editing

AMPA-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs) play a major role in excitatory synaptic transmission and plasticity. Channel properties are largely dictated by their composition of the four subunits, GluR1-4 (or A-D). Here we show that AMPAR assembly and subunit stoichiometry are determined by RNA editing in the pore loop. We demonstrate that editing at the GluR2 Q/R site regulates AMPAR assembly at the step of tetramerization. Specifically, edited R subunits are largely unassembled and ER retained, whereas unedited Q subunits readily tetramerize and traffic to synapses. This assembly mechanism restricts the number of the functionally critical R subunits in AMPAR tetramers. Therefore, a single amino acid residue affects channel composition and, in turn, controls ion conduction through the majority of AMPARs in the brain.     

AMPA receptor subunit-specific regulation by a distinct family of type II TARPs

AMPA-type glutamate receptors (GluRs) play major roles in excitatory synaptic transmission. Neuronal AMPA receptors comprise GluR subunits and transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins (TARPs). Previous studies identified five mammalian TARPs, gamma-2 (or stargazin), gamma-3, gamma-4, gamma-7, and gamma-8, that enhance AMPA receptor function. Here, we classify gamma-5 as a distinct class of TARP that modulates specific GluR2-containing AMPA receptors and displays properties entirely dissimilar from canonical TARPs. Gamma-5 increases peak currents and decreases the steady-state currents selectively from GluR2-containing AMPA receptors. Furthermore, gamma-5 increases rates of GluR2 deactivation and desensitization and decreases glutamate potency. Remarkably, all effects of gamma-5 require editing of GluR2 mRNA. Unlike other TARPs, gamma-5 modulates GluR2 without promoting receptor trafficking. We also find that gamma-7 regulation of GluR2 is dictated by mRNA editing. These data establish gamma-5 and gamma-7 as a separate family of "type II TARPs" that impart distinct physiological features to specific AMPA receptors.     

Functional assembly of AMPA and kainate receptors is mediated by several discrete protein-protein interactions

Functional heterogeneity of ionotropic glutamate receptors arises not only from the existence of many subunits and isoforms, but also from combinatorial assembly creating channels with distinct properties. This heteromerization is subtype restricted and thought to be determined exclusively by the proximal extracellular N-terminal domain of the subunits. However, using functional assays for heteromer formation, we show that, besides the N-terminal domain, the membrane sector and the C-terminal part of S2 are critical determinants for the formation of functional channels. Our results are compatible with a model where the N-terminal domain only mediates the initial subunit associations into dimers, whereas for the assembly of the full functional tetramer, compatibility of the other regions is required.     

Clustering of AMPA receptors by the synaptic PDZ domain-containing protein PICK1

Synaptic clustering of neurotransmitter receptors is crucial for efficient signal transduction and integration in neurons. PDZ domain-containing proteins such as PSD-95/SAP90 interact with the intracellular C termini of a variety of receptors and are thought to be important in the targeting and anchoring of receptors to specific synapses. Here, we show that PICK1 (protein interacting with C kinase), a PDZ domain-containing protein, interacts with the C termini of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptors in vitro and in vivo. In neurons, PICK1 specifically colocalizes with AMPA receptors at excitatory synapses. Furthermore, PICK1 induces clustering of AMPA receptors in heterologous expression systems. These results suggest that PICK1 may play an important role in the modulation of synaptic transmission by regulating the synaptic targeting of AMPA receptors.     

Comparing fluctuations of synaptic responses mediated via AMPA and NMDA receptor channels--implications for synaptic plasticity

Glutamate-releasing synapses are essential in fast neuronal signalling. Plasticity at these synapses is important for learning and memory as well as for the activity-dependent control of neuronal development. We have evaluated the trial-to-trial fluctuations of excitatory postsynaptic currents mediated by glutamate receptors of the AMPA and NMDA types in CA1 pyramidal cells. By using the whole cell patch clamp technique in brain slices from young rats, we have demonstrated that the relative variability of AMPA and NMDA receptor mediated responses, expressed as the coefficient of variation, is similar for these two types of responses [Brain Res. 800 (1998) 253-259]. The present paper summarizes and discusses these results in relation to current theories on hippocampal synaptic plasticity, especially with regard to the ideas of glutamate spillover and silent synapses. Our finding of a correspondence between AMPA and NMDA responses with respect to fluctuations is compatible with our previous finding of equal relative changes of the two during activity induced synaptic plasticity. However, the results argue against the glutamate spillover model according to which the effect of glutamate--and hence the induction of plasticity--may spread unspecifically between synapses. But how can silent synapses become functional if no spread of glutamate occurs and no initial signal is present to trigger the functionalization? Is it necessary that NMDA responses are present at these synapses, which are then silent merely with respect to AMPA receptors, or do other alternatives exist? Our discussion aims to elucidate these questions.     

Inhibition of Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerization by PICK1 regulates neuronal morphology and AMPA receptor endocytosis

The dynamic regulation of actin polymerization plays crucial roles in cell morphology and endocytosis. The mechanistic details of these processes and the proteins involved are not fully understood, especially in neurons. PICK1 is a PDZ-BAR-domain protein involved in regulated AMPA receptor (AMPAR) endocytosis in neurons. Here, we demonstrate that PICK1 binds filamentous (F)-actin and the actin-nucleating Arp2/3 complex, and potently inhibits Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerization. RNA interference (RNAi) knockdown of PICK1 in neurons induces a reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton resulting in aberrant cell morphology. Wild-type PICK1 rescues this phenotype, but a mutant PICK1, PICK1(W413A), that does not bind or inhibit Arp2/3 has no effect. Furthermore, this mutant also blocks NMDA-induced AMPAR internalization. This study identifies PICK1 as a negative regulator of Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerization that is critical for a specific form of vesicle trafficking, and also for the development of neuronal architecture.     

NSF binds calcium to regulate its interaction with AMPA receptor subunit GluR2

N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein (NSF) is essential for numerous Ca(2+)-triggered vesicle trafficking events. It functions as a molecular chaperone to regulate trafficking protein complexes such as the soluble NSF attachment protein (SNAP) receptor complex and the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR)-protein interacting with C-kinase (PICK1) complex. AMPAR trafficking is fundamental to processes of synaptic plasticity, which may underlie learning and memory. Changes in synaptic strength brought about by AMPAR trafficking are triggered by a post-synaptic influx of Ca(2+), which may have numerous molecular targets including PICK1. NSF binds AMPAR subunit glutamate receptor subunit 2 (GluR2) and functions to maintain receptors at the synapse. In this study, it was showed that NSF is a Ca(2+)-binding protein and that GluR2-NSF interactions are inhibited by the presence of 15 mumol/L Ca(2+). NSF Ca(2+)-binding is reciprocally inhibited by the presence of GluR2 C-terminus. Mutant of NSF that binds Ca(2+) with reduced affinity and binds GluR2 with reduced sensitivity to Ca(2+) was identied. In addition, the interaction of betaSNAP with PICK1 is sensitive to Ca(2+). This study demonstrates that the GluR2-NSF-betaSNAP-PICK1 complex is regulated directly by Ca(2+), allowing for the transduction of Ca(2+) signals into concerted alterations in protein-protein interactions to bring about changes in AMPAR trafficking during synaptic plasticity.     

Regulation of AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity

AMPA receptors (AMPARs) mediate the majority of fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the brain. Dynamic changes in neuronal synaptic efficacy, termed synaptic plasticity, are thought to underlie information coding and storage in learning and memory. One major mechanism that regulates synaptic strength involves the tightly regulated trafficking of AMPARs into and out of synapses. The life cycle of AMPARs from their biosynthesis, membrane trafficking, and synaptic targeting to their degradation are controlled by a series of orchestrated interactions with numerous intracellular regulatory proteins. Here we review recent progress made toward the understanding the regulation of AMPAR trafficking, focusing on the roles of several key intracellular AMPAR interacting proteins.     

Ionotropic glutamate receptor AMPA 1 is associated with ovulation rate

Ionotropic glutamate receptors mediate most excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system by opening ion channels upon the binding of glutamate. Despite the essential roles of glutamate in the control of reproduction and anterior pituitary hormone secretion, there is a limited understanding of how glutamate receptors control ovulation. Here we reveal the function of the ionotropic glutamate receptor AMPA-1 (GRIA1) in ovulation. Based on a genome-wide association study in Bos taurus, we found that ovulation rate is influenced by a variation in the N-terminal leucine/isoleucine/valine-binding protein (LIVBP) domain of GRIA1, in which serine is replaced by asparagine. GRIA1(Asn) has a weaker affinity to glutamate than GRIA1(Ser), both in Xenopus oocytes and in the membrane fraction of bovine brain. This single amino acid substitution leads to the decreased release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in immortalized hypothalamic GT1-7 cells. Cows with GRIA1(Asn) have a slower luteinizing hormone (LH) surge than cows with GRIA1(Ser). In addition, cows with GRIA1(Asn) possess fewer immature ovarian follicles before superovulation and have a lower response to hormone treatment than cows with GRIA1(Ser). Our work identified that GRIA1 is a critical mediator of ovulation and that GRIA1 might be a useful target for reproductive therapy.     

Phosphorylation of the AMPA receptor GluR1 subunit is required for synaptic plasticity and retention of spatial memory

Plasticity of the nervous system is dependent on mechanisms that regulate the strength of synaptic transmission. Excitatory synapses in the brain undergo long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), cellular models of learning and memory. Protein phosphorylation is required for the induction of many forms of synaptic plasticity, including LTP and LTD. However, the critical kinase substrates that mediate plasticity have not been identified. We previously reported that phosphorylation of the GluR1 subunit of AMPA receptors, which mediate rapid excitatory transmission in the brain, is modulated during LTP and LTD. To test if GluR1 phosphorylation is necessary for plasticity and learning and memory, we generated mice with knockin mutations in the GluR1 phosphorylation sites. The phosphomutant mice show deficits in LTD and LTP and have memory defects in spatial learning tasks. These results demonstrate that phosphorylation of GluR1 is critical for LTD and LTP expression and the retention of memories.     

Phosphorylation-dependent interactions of alpha-Actinin-1/IQGAP1 with the AMPA receptor subunit GluR4

AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid) receptors play key roles in excitatory synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity in the CNS. Although a variety of proteins has been characterized to interact with AMPA receptors and regulate their function, little is known about the regulation of the AMPA receptor subunit GluR4. To understand the molecular mechanisms of GluR4 functional regulation, the yeast two-hybrid system was used to identify GluR4-interacting molecules. alpha-Actinin-1 and IQGAP1 were identified to be GluR4-specific binding partners. Both proteins interact specifically with GluR4 and co-cluster with GluR4 individually in neurons. Mapping experiments revealed that alpha-Actinin-1 and IQGAP1 bind to the same region within the C-terminus of GluR4 that contains a previously identified PKA phosphorylation site, Ser842, phosphorylation of which is regulated by synaptic activity. Interestingly, the phosphorylation of Ser842 differentially regulates interactions of GluR4 with alpha-Actinin-1 and IQGAP1; phosphorylation strongly inhibits interaction of GluR4 with alpha-Actinin-1 but has little effect on its interaction with IQGAP1. These results suggest that alpha-Actinin-1 and IQGAP1 regulate GluR4 functions via their specific associations with GluR4. In addition, our data indicate that activity-dependent phosphorylation of GluR4 may regulate its synaptic targeting through phosphorylation-dependent interactions with alpha-Actinin-1 and IQGAP1.     

Role of AMPA receptor cycling in synaptic transmission and plasticity

Compounds known to disrupt exocytosis or endocytosis were introduced into CA1 pyramidal cells while monitoring excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). Disrupting exocytosis or the interaction of GluR2 with NSF caused a gradual reduction in the AMPAR EPSC, while inhibition of endocytosis caused a gradual increase in the AMPAR EPSC. These manipulations had no effect on the NMDAR EPSC but prevented the subsequent induction of LTD. These results suggest that AMPARs, but not NMDARs, cycle into and out of the synaptic membrane at a rapid rate and that certain forms of synaptic plasticity may utilize this dynamic process.     

Ras and Rap control AMPA receptor trafficking during synaptic plasticity

Recent studies show that AMPA receptor (-R) trafficking is important in synaptic plasticity. However, the signaling controlling this trafficking is poorly understood. Small GTPases have diverse neuronal functions and their perturbation is responsible for several mental disorders. Here, we examine the small GTPases Ras and Rap in the postsynaptic signaling underlying synaptic plasticity. We show that Ras relays the NMDA-R and CaMKII signaling that drives synaptic delivery of AMPA-Rs during long-term potentiation. In contrast, Rap mediates NMDA-R-dependent removal of synaptic AMPA-Rs that occurs during long-term depression. Ras and Rap exert their effects on AMPA-Rs that contain different subunit composition. Thus, Ras and Rap, whose activity can be controlled by postsynaptic enzymes, serve as independent regulators for potentiating and depressing central synapses.     

AMPA receptor regulation during synaptic plasticity in hippocampus and neocortex

Discovery of long-term potentiation (LTP) in the dentate gyrus of the rabbit hippocampus by Bliss and L?mo opened up a whole new field to study activity-dependent long-term synaptic modifications in the brain. Since then hippocampal synapses have been a key model system to study the mechanisms of different forms of synaptic plasticity. At least for the postsynaptic forms of LTP and long-term depression (LTD), regulation of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) has emerged as a key mechanism. While many of the synaptic plasticity mechanisms uncovered in at the hippocampal synapses apply to synapses across diverse brain regions, there are differences in the mechanisms that often reveal the specific functional requirements of the brain area under study. Here we will review AMPAR regulation underlying synaptic plasticity in hippocampus and neocortex. The main focus of this review will be placed on postsynaptic forms of synaptic plasticity that impinge on the regulation of AMPARs using hippocampal CA1 and primary sensory cortices as examples. And through the comparison, we will highlight the key similarities and functional differences between the two synapses.     

NSF ATPase and alpha-/beta-SNAPs disassemble the AMPA receptor-PICK1 complex

AMPA receptor (AMPAR) trafficking is crucial for synaptic plasticity that may be important for learning and memory. NSF and PICK1 bind the AMPAR GluR2 subunit and are involved in trafficking of AMPARs. Here, we show that GluR2, PICK1, NSF, and alpha-/beta-SNAPs form a complex in the presence of ATPgammaS. Similar to SNARE complex disassembly, NSF ATPase activity disrupts PICK1-GluR2 interactions in this complex. Alpha- and beta-SNAP have differential effects on this reaction. SNAP overexpression in hippocampal neurons leads to corresponding changes in AMPAR trafficking by acting on GluR2-PICK1 complexes. This demonstrates that the previously reported synaptic stabilization of AMPARs by NSF involves disruption of GluR2-PICK1 interactions. Furthermore, we are reporting a non-SNARE substrate for NSF disassembly activity.     

Learning,AMPA receptor mobility and synaptic plasticity depend on n‐cofilin‐mediated actin dynamics

Neuronal plasticity is an important process for learning, memory and complex behaviour. Rapid remodelling of the actin cytoskeleton in the postsynaptic compartment is thought to have an important function for synaptic plasticity. However, the actin‐binding proteins involved and the molecular mechanisms that in vivo link actin dynamics to postsynaptic physiology are not well understood. Here, we show that the actin filament depolymerizing protein n‐cofilin is controlling dendritic spine morphology and postsynaptic parameters such as late long‐term potentiation and long‐term depression. Loss of n‐cofilin‐mediated synaptic actin dynamics in the forebrain specifically leads to impairment of all types of associative learning, whereas exploratory learning is not affected. We provide evidence for a novel function of n‐cofilin function in synaptic plasticity and in the control of extrasynaptic excitatory AMPA receptors diffusion. These results suggest a critical function of actin dynamics in associative learning and postsynaptic receptor availability.     

PICK1 is required for the control of synaptic transmission by the metabotropic glutamate receptor 7

Both postsynaptic density and presynaptic active zone are structural matrix containing scaffolding proteins that are involved in the organization of the synapse. Little is known about the functional role of these proteins in the signaling of presynaptic receptors. Here we show that the interaction of the presynaptic metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor subtype, mGlu7a, with the postsynaptic density-95 disc-large zona occludens 1 (PDZ) domain-containing protein, PICK1, is required for specific inhibition of P/Q-type Ca(2+) channels, in cultured cerebellar granule neurons. Furthermore, we show that activation of the presynaptic mGlu7a receptor inhibits synaptic transmission and this effect also requires the presence of PICK1. These results indicate that the scaffolding protein, PICK1, plays an essential role in the control of synaptic transmission by the mGlu7a receptor complex.     

Targeted in vivo mutations of the AMPA receptor subunit GluR2 and its interacting protein PICK1 eliminate cerebellar long-term depression

Cerebellar long-term depression (LTD) is a major form of synaptic plasticity that is thought to be critical for certain types of motor learning. Phosphorylation of the AMPA receptor subunit GluR2 on serine-880 as well as interaction of GluR2 with PICK1 have been suggested to contribute to the endocytic removal of postsynaptic AMPA receptors during LTD. Here, we show that targeted mutation of PICK1, the GluR2 C-terminal PDZ ligand, or the GluR2 PKC phosphorylation site eliminates cerebellar LTD in mice. LTD can be rescued in cerebellar cultures from mice lacking PICK1 by transfection of wild-type PICK1 but not by a PDZ mutant or a BAR domain mutant deficient in lipid binding, indicating the importance of these domains in PICK1 function. These results demonstrate that PICK1-GluR2 PDZ-based interactions and GluR2 phosphorylation are required for LTD expression in the cerebellum.