Evaluating breast parenchymal maldistribution with regard to mastopexy and augmentation mammaplasty

Mammary parenchymal maldistribution or lower-pole hypoplasia, a first cousin of the tubular breast deformity, is a common condition complicating the selection of patients for retropectoral augmentation mammaplasty and/or mastopexy. The eccentric mammary parenchyma must be released from the pectoral fascia to obtain good results with augmentation mammaplasty and to minimize the necessity for mastopexy.     

Is there a reduction mammaplasty for "all seasons?".

No technique will serve the needs of all patients requiring a reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy. However, the modified, inferiorly-based dermal flap technique appears to us to offer the most advantages and the greatest latitude for a predictable breast reduction in most of these patients.     

In search of better shape in mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty

"Bottoming out" of parenchyma after several months is a problem extant in previous techniques of mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty. The authors have addressed this problem by creation of a mobile, chest wall-based flap of breast tissue that is passed under and held in place by a loop of pectoral muscle. Experience with this technique spans a period of 7 years and includes 390 patients, indicating the permanence of this correction.     

Recurrent deformities following reduction mammaplasty and correction of breast asymmetry

In order to properly evaluate results after reduction mammaplasty and correction of breast asymmetry, it is necessary to follow patients for several years. Cases are presented in which unusual deformities occurred after an initial satisfactory result. Pregnancy, aging, and fluctuations in weight contributed to these deformities. A case of recurrent hypertrophy 4 years following a reduction mammaplasty is presented. Several cases of asymmetry corrected by a combination of reduction and augmentation had early satisfactory results but several years later again showed asymmetry due to recurrent ptosis or atrophy. In one case, a 10-year follow-up showed considerable deformity after an initial good result following asymmetrical augmentation. It is important to point out to patients that changes do occur and that occasionally additional surgery is necessary.     

A new mastopexy operation for mild or moderate breast ptosis.

A new procedure for mastopexy, with or wtihout an augmentatiom mammaplasty, is presented. Its advantage is the minimal resultant scarring in the least conspicuous location.     

Augmentation mammaplasty by means of the transrectus route

A new operative technique has been developed for augmentation mammaplasty. Through an inframammary incision, the anterior rectus sheath is entered, and the pocket is dissected in an entirely submuscular plane. We have performed this procedure in 112 patients to date. Complications have been few. The capsular contracture rate in 90 patients followed for greater than 1 year is 7 percent. The inframammary crease can be lowered using this technique, making mastopexy unnecessary in most patients with moderate ptosis.     

Secondary reduction mammaplasty: is using a different pedicle safe?

Reduction mammaplasty is a frequently performed procedure and one with consistent patient satisfaction. Few patients present for revisional procedures, and even fewer present for a secondary or repeated reduction mammaplasty. This study defines secondary reduction mammaplasty as performing an additional reduction using a pedicled nipple-areola complex. Few reports of secondary reduction are found in the literature. Operative guidelines for secondary reduction mammaplasty have been published recently. However, the experience of others has differed from these guidelines, and herein is presented another experience with secondary reduction mammaplasty. Ten cases of secondary reduction over a 37-year period were identified and reviewed. The initial reductions were performed using six different techniques. An average of 307 g of tissue per breast (range, 130 to 552 g) was removed at the initial operations. The secondary reductions were performed using four different techniques, and an average of 458 g of tissue per breast (range, 147 to 700 g) was removed at the secondary operations. Three of the 10 patients underwent initial and secondary reduction with the same technique. An average of 4 years (range, 1 to 10 years) separated these surgeries. Seven of the 10 patients underwent initial and secondary reductions with different technique. An average of 15 years (range, 5 to 19 years) separated these procedures. There was an average 5-year follow-up (range, 1 to 20 years) in this series. Four of the 10 patients experienced self-limiting complications after secondary reduction, including delay in wound healing, delay in the return of nipple sensitivity, and mild fat necrosis. Three of the four patients with complications had undergone secondary reduction with a different pedicle technique. No significant or long-lasting skin, pedicle, or nipple-areola complex compromise was found after secondary reduction mammaplasty. In contrast to the recently published guidelines, this study demonstrates that secondary reduction mammaplasty is a safe and viable option when performed with either similar or different technique. This finding allows secondary reduction mammaplasty to be tailored to the individual breast type and to the abilities of the specific surgeon.     

"Zigzag" wavy-line periareolar incision

There is almost no mention of improvement in the aesthetics of areolar incisions in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature. The most visible area of the breast is the central mound; therefore, it behooves surgeons to make an areolar incision as inconspicuous as possible. Minimal incision breast operations and short-scar operations, such as mastopexy and vertical reduction mammaplasty, use a circumareolar incision. This circumareolar technique, which specifically avoids a purse-string support suture, is useful in all periareolar incisions. This method creates a scar that mimics the elusive, natural irregularity between the areola and periareolar skin. The goal is to have an irregular, random, wavy line that appears more natural. Between August of 1998 and August of 1999, 104 "zigzag" wavy-line procedures were performed. The complications seen in this series included delayed healing in four patients and hypertrophic scar in two patients. No scars were surgically revised. The results demonstrated a definite difference compared to a circular scar. The zigzag wavy-line technique complements the innovative methods that shorten scars while they create a more natural, lasting breast mound. For areolar incisions, good results are deceptively subtle, but unnatural results can be painfully obvious. The zigzag wavy-line incision subtly eludes the eye in diminishing the signs the patient has undergone an operation.     

Dermal suspension flap in vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty

Reduction mammaplasty has the following goals: appropriate reduction of breast size, symmetric and youthful breast shape, minimal and inconspicuous scars, and stable, long-term results. Although the first two parameters can be obtained by various reduction techniques, vertical-scar mammaplasty eliminates the horizontal inframammary scar, thereby reducing total scar length. Dermal flaps have been described in various types of reduction mammaplasty. The refinement of the authors' method is the incorporation of a superiorly pedicled dermal flap for better and longer-lasting support in vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty. A total of 73 vertical breast reductions in 38 patients were performed with this technique from May of 1996 to November of 1999. Vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty with a dermal suspension flap combines minimal scars with an internal support for long-term stability of the breast shape.     

Outcome analysis of reduction mammaplasty using the modified Robertson technique

The benefits of reduction mammaplasty have been well documented in previous literature. Anticipating and correcting for pseudoptosis (bottoming-out), however, can impair the cosmetic outcome as the inferior skin envelope stretches and lengthens over time. We present long-term results on patients using the modified Robertson technique for reduction mammaplasty, which appears to have significant benefit in helping to prevent bottoming-out. Surveys were sent to patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty surgery with this technique from 1987 to 1997. Patients were queried regarding preoperative and postoperative symptoms, satisfaction, and outcome related to their surgery and were also offered free follow-up examinations. The patients who returned for follow-up were then evaluated by the attending surgeons for evaluation of scarring, nipple position, ptosis, pseudoptosis, shape, and overall appearance. Reduced breasts were also compared with cosmetically optimal breasts to compare for measured levels of pseudoptosis using our defined visual inferior pole ratio measurements. Average reduction size was 910 g and follow-up was 4.7 years from the time of surgery. There was significant improvement demonstrated in all areas questioned, with the greatest relief shown in back and shoulder pain, shoulder grooving, and difficulty fitting clothing. There was also demonstrated to be significantly less use of medical modalities postoperatively and significant increases in activity levels. Satisfaction for size, shape, symmetry, and overall results was 85, 94, 98, and 94 percent, respectively. Evaluations for pseudoptosis by the attending surgeons were rated good or excellent in 95 percent of patients. Measurements of the visual inferior pole ratio for pseudoptosis also demonstrated no significant differences when compared with aesthetically optimal breasts. The modified Robertson reduction mammaplasty is a reliable technique that can be used for both small and large reductions, giving both reliable and consistent results. This technique significantly improves symptoms, as do other reduction techniques, but has the added advantage of helping to avoid pseudoptosis postoperatively.     

Reduction mammaplasty in postburn breasts.

Thermal injury to the anterior chest in the adolescent girl can lead to severe disfigurement of the breasts. Just as in certain non-burn female patients, mammary hyperplasia can occur in patients with previous full-thickness burns of their breasts. Most plastic surgeons have been reluctant to perform reduction mammaplasty in these patients for fear of devascularizing the skin graft or the nipple-areola complex. A series of six patients with full-thickness burns of the breasts and subsequent skin graft coverage before reduction mammaplasty is reported. Four patients had bilaterally burned breasts requiring reduction. Two patients had one burned breast reduced, and one required a balancing procedure on the unburned side. Reduction mammaplasty was performed using the inferior-pedicle technique. The mean amount of tissue removed for the left and right breasts was 454 and 395 g, respectively. There was no nipple loss, hematoma, infection, or major loss of skin flaps. Reduction mammaplasty in this group of patients is safe and carries minimal risk if certain key concepts are followed carefully.     

Recurrent mammary hyperplasia: current concepts

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the factors leading to undesirable long-term reduction mammaplasty results. 2. Delineate the differential diagnosis of recurrent hypermastia. 3. Understand the significance of preoperative counseling, particularly with regard to expected postoperative outcome. 4. Understand short-term and long-term expected and undesirable postoperative results. 5. Understand safe and effective surgical planning for revision reduction mammaplasty. A large majority of patients who undergo reduction mammaplasty are satisfied with their aesthetic outcome and resolution of preoperative symptoms. Occasionally, patients present with postoperative concerns; these are usually aesthetic in nature and caused by breast scarring, breast asymmetry, and/or breast shape. Inadequate excision and recurrent hypermastia are more complex concerns, which require careful evaluation and treatment. Analysis of both the presenting deformity and the original surgical approach is critical in determining an operative plan. This article discusses the safe approach to revision reduction mammaplasty. Current concepts are discussed and presented. An algorithm for decision-making is presented and discussed.     

Dual-pedicle dermoparenchymal mastopexy

Mastopexy for treatment of breast ptosis, with or without augmentation or reduction, is often followed by recurrent ptosis. A new mastopexy technique is described which appears to offer long-term correction. After conservative resection of excess skin, the breast parenchyma is elevated from the chest wall, and redundant caudal deepithelialized breast tissue is divided into two equal (or unequal) superiorly based pedicles. These are criss-crossed (as in folding of arms), overlapped, and secured to the pectoral fascia in a position cephalad to the nipple-areolar complex. This technique, dual-pedicle dermoparenchymal mastopexy (DPM), forms a cone of the breast tissue and provides a "cradle" of support. It permits insertion of a prosthesis if needed. Based, in part, on concepts of traditional and more recently described pedicled breast reductions, it enjoys the advantage of preserving skin attachment to underlying unresected breast parenchyma. In addition, it repositions ptotically displaced breast parenchyma into a cephalad position and fixes it (the "pexy") to the chest wall. A 10-year experience is presented with representative cases to illustrate the basic mastopexy and its use with augmentation or reduction.     

Short scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction (SPAIR) mammaplasty

A method of breast reduction is presented that maintains the blood supply and innervation to the nipple and areola complex by means of an inferior pedicle, reduces the breast volume by removing tissue from the periphery of the breast, maintains breast shape with internal plication sutures, and limits the scar using a periareolar technique with a short inferior vertical-to-oblique extension. There were 167 breasts in 98 patients reduced in this fashion. The average resection volume was 632 g per breast, with an average follow-up of 7.6 months. The complication rate was similar to that observed using traditional inferior pedicle techniques with the inverted-T cutaneous scar. This technique has proven to be versatile, technically straightforward, and applicable to breasts of all sizes for both breast reduction and mastopexy. By combining the aesthetic advantage of less cutaneous scarring with the safety and familiarity of the inferiorly based pedicle, superior results in breast reduction can be obtained that are consistent, long-lasting, and satisfying for both patient and surgeon alike.     

Maximizing breast projection after free-nipple-graft reduction mammaplasty

In 1922, Thorek described standard free-nipple reduction mammaplasty for gigantomastia. This technique provided a simple and effective way to perform reduction mammaplasty. However, the technique is frequently criticized for producing a breast and nipple with poor projection. Even with the standard modification of the original technique, the resultant breast and nipple may be wide and flat, with unpredictable nipple-areola pigmentation. To create a breast mound and nipple with projection and even pigmentation, the free-nipple-graft breast reduction technique is presented. The Wise pattern skin reduction markings and the superiorly based parenchymal reduction technique are used. After the nipple-areola complex is removed, as a free graft, the inferior pole of the breast is then amputated along the Wise pattern skin markings, leaving lateral and medial pillars of breast tissue, with the apex of the resection corresponding to the new nipple location. The lateral and medial pillars of the superiorly based breast mound are then sutured together. Key interrupted sutures are placed, beginning at the most inferior and posterior point of the pillars, while recruiting tissue centrally to increase the projection. The intersecting point of the inverted T, at 7 cm from the new nipple position, is then sutured to the fasciae of the pectoralis major muscle. If more central projection is desired, the vertical limb design can be lengthened. The tissue inferior to the 7-cm mark is de-epithelialized and tucked under the central breast, if needed, contributing further to the final breast parenchyma projection. The skin of the vertical limb of the Wise pattern is then closed with a dog-ear at the apex to further contribute to nipple projection. The nipple is replaced as a free, thick, split-thickness skin graft. The breast is temporarily closed, and the medial and lateral breast tissue excess is liposuctioned to create a more conical breast. Excessive medial and lateral skin is then resected, keeping the inframammary crease incision under the breast mound. Twenty-five patients underwent free-nipple-graft reduction mammaplasty using this technique between 1992 and 2000. An average of 1600 g of breast tissue per breast was removed. The average follow-up period was 36 months. Patient satisfaction has been very high.     

Refinements in transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: projection and contour improvements

A surgical procedure with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap for breast reconstruction is presented using parameters from the opposite normal breast to achieve a better cone shape in the new breast to project the nipple-areola complex. This cone projection is obtained through a vertical plication of both skin/fat halves of the TRAM flap and with two supraumbilical fat flaps to avoid cone collapse. The infraclavicular and axillary regions are filled with a de-epithelialized "fish-fin" cutaneous-fat or fat-only flap, which is placed as a lateral TRAM extension. The de-epithelialized lateral extremity of the TRAM flap folded over itself gives a mound shape to the lateral aspect of the new breast, and the inverted umbilical stalk attached to the TRAM flap imitates a nipple. This procedure is based on six breast reconstructions with a 2-year follow-up. The procedure is a simple, safe, and versatile way to mimic the opposite breast. It is mostly indicated for thin patients who have small to moderate breasts without ptosis or hypertrophy who refuse breast implants or request a mastopexy or reduction mammaplasty on the opposite normal breast during the same procedure.     

Arch reduction mammaplasty

Arch mammaplasty is a breast reduction technique based on the inferior pedicle. It uses all the specific advantages of the inferior pedicle while avoiding the inframammary scars and dead space that occur with the inverted T technique. Arch mammaplasty has proven versatile and extremely safe, and it has a surprisingly good rate of acceptance by the patients. The scarring is aesthetically superior to that obtained with the well-accepted, inverted-T scar technique of the past.     

Mammaplasty: large reduction with short inframammary scars

We present a technique for reduction mammaplasty that produces small inframammary scars measuring a maximum of 8 cm in large reductions and practically eliminates the difficulty in the mobility of the nipple-areola complex. We believe that the greatest contribution of the technique presented here is that good aesthetic results were obtained together with small inframammary scars.     

Superomedial pedicle technique of reduction mammaplasty

A series of 148 patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty utilizing the superomedial pedicle technique is presented. Resections as large as 4100 gm per breast with nipple-areola transpositions up to 30 cm were done with reliable nipple-areola survival, including preservation of sensation. The superior pedicle technique of breast reduction is recognized by many as technically easier and capable of producing a longer-lasting aesthetic effect. Classically, however, it has been limited to smaller resections. By incorporating the medial quadrant in the superior pedicle, more aggressive reductions can be safely undertaken with the same excellent results. Details of the procedure, the anatomic basis for its success, and complications are discussed.