Myelodysplasia and radiation

Reasons are given why myelodysplasia should be considered in any assessment in humans of radiation exposure as an etiological factor for the development of leukemia.     

Pigmentation effects of solar-simulated radiation as compared with UVA and UVB radiation

Different wavelengths of ultraviolet (UV) radiation elicit different responses in the skin. UVA induces immediate tanning and persistent pigment darkening through oxidation of pre-existing melanin or melanogenic precursors, while UVB induces delayed tanning which takes several days or longer to develop and requires activation of melanocytes. We compared the effects of a 2-week repetitive exposure of human skin to solar-simulated radiation (SSR), UVA or UVB at doses eliciting comparable levels of visible tanning and measured levels of melanins and melanin-related metabolites. Levels of eumelanin and pheomelanin were significantly higher in the order of SSR, UVB, UVA or unexposed control skin. Levels of free 5-S-cysteinyldopa (5SCD) were elevated about 4-fold in SSR- or UVB-exposed skin compared with UVA-exposed or control skin. Levels of protein-bound form of 5SCD tended to be higher in SSR- or UVB-exposed skin than in UVA-exposed or control skin. Total levels of 5-hydroxy-6-methoxyindole-2-carboxylic acid (5H6MI2C) and 6H5MI2C were higher in SSR- than in UVB-exposed or control skin. These results show that SSR is more effective in promoting delayed tanning than UVB radiation alone, suggesting a synergistic effect of UVA radiation. Furthermore, free 5SCD may serve as a good marker of the effect of SSR and UVB.     

Efficacy of radiation countermeasures depends on radiation quality

The detonation of a nuclear weapon or a nuclear accident represent possible events with significant exposure to mixed neutron/γ-radiation fields. Although radiation countermeasures generally have been studied in subjects exposed to pure photons (γ or X rays), the mechanisms of injury of these low linear energy transfer (LET) radiations are different from those of high-LET radiation such as neutrons, and these differences may affect countermeasure efficacy. We compared 30-day survival in mice after varying doses of pure γ and mixed neutron/γ (mixed field) radiation (MF, Dn/Dt = 0.65), and also examined peripheral blood cells, bone marrow cell reconstitution, and cytokine expression. Mixed-field-irradiated mice displayed prolonged defects in T-cell populations compared to mice irradiated with pure γ photons. In mouse survival assays, the growth factor granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was effective as a (post-irradiation) mitigator against both γ-photons and mixed-field radiation, while the thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetic ALXN4100TPO was effective only against γ irradiation. The results indicate that radiation countermeasures should be tested against radiation qualities appropriate for specific scenarios before inclusion in response plans.     

Protracted low-dose radiation priming and response of liver to acute gamma and proton radiation

Abstract

This study evaluated liver from C57BL/6 mice irradiated with low-dose/low-dose-rate (LDR) γ-rays (0.01 Gy, 0.03 cGy/h), with and without subsequent exposure to acute 2 Gy gamma or proton radiation. Analyses were performed on day 56 post-exposure. Expression patterns of apoptosis-related genes were strikingly different among irradiated groups compared with 0 Gy (p < 0.05). Two genes were affected in the Gamma group, whereas 10 were modified in the LDR + Gamma group. In Proton and LDR + Proton groups, there were six and 12 affected genes, respectively. Expression of genes in the Gamma (Traf3) and Proton (Bak1, Birc2, Birc3, Mcl1) groups was no longer different from 0 Gy control group when mice were pre-exposed to LDR γ-rays. When each combined regimen was compared with the corresponding group that received acute radiation alone, two genes in the LDR + Gamma group and 17 genes in the LDR + Proton group were modified; greatest effect was on Birc2 and Nol3 (> 5-fold up-regulated by LDR + Protons). Oxygen radical production in livers from the LDR + Proton group was higher in LDR, Gamma, and LDR + Gamma groups (p < 0.05 vs. 0 Gy), but there were no differences in phagocytosis of E. coli. Sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) suggested more inflammation, with and without necrosis, in some irradiated groups. The data demonstrate that response to acute radiation is dependent on radiation quality and regimen and that some LDR γ-ray-induced modifications in liver response were still evident nearly 2 months after exposure.     

Radiobiology and radiation hygiene

From the analysis of clinical, epidemiological and radiobiological data the radiation effect levels have been determined at which nonstochastic and stochastic effects are or are not displayed during the average life of a human being. The most "noneffective" radiation does have been used in calculating the major dose thresholds of "non-harmful" exposures.     

Hybridization and adaptive radiation

Whether interspecific hybridization is important as a mechanism that generates biological diversity is a matter of controversy. Whereas some authors focus on the potential of hybridization as a source of genetic variation, functional novelty and new species, others argue against any important role, because reduced fitness would typically render hybrids an evolutionary dead end. By drawing on recent developments in the genetics and ecology of hybridization and on principles of ecological speciation theory, I develop a concept that reconciles these views and adds a new twist to this debate. Because hybridization is common when populations invade new environments and potentially elevates rates of response to selection, it predisposes colonizing populations to rapid adaptive diversification under disruptive or divergent selection. I discuss predictions and suggest tests of this hybrid swarm theory of adaptive radiation and review published molecular phylogenies of adaptive radiations in light of the theory.     

Genotoxic effects of radiation and hyperthermia in linear mice with different radiation sensitivity

The features of the repair processes of DNA damage and their implementation at the chromosome level in marrow cells of experimental animals (mices of the CBA and C3H lines) with different radiation sensitivity were studied. It is shown that the radiomodifying efficiency of moderate hyperthermia (HT) is higher for animals of the radioresyst line. At the same time, it was possible to observe intensive elimination of chromosomal damages, the level of which in later observations almost was not distinguished from the control values. For mices of more radiosensitive lines, a long-term potentiation damaging action of irradiation at the chromosomal level was observed as an additional HT effect.     

In vitro generation of cytotoxic lymphocytes against radiation and radiation leukemia virus-induced tumors

Summary Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) to syngeneic radiation- or radiation leukemia virus (RadLV)-induced tumors were generated in vitro in mixed lymphocytetumor cultures (MLTC) using splenocytes of mice primed in vivo with inactivated tumor cells. Effective sensitization was obtained with virus-producer cell lines, while cells of a virus-nonproducer line did not sensitize.The CTL could lyse syngeneic, but not allogeneic, tumor cells of established lines producing C-type virus and therefore expressing membrane-associated viral antigenicity.Susceptibility of primary leukemias to cell-mediated lysis could not be tested due to a very high spontaneous ⁵¹ Cr release shortly after labeling. In a cold target competition assay, however, the RadLV-induced, but not the X-radiation-induced primary tumor cells inhibited the cytotoxic reactivity. This inhibition was correlated with the level of viral antigen expression on the inhibiting cells, which was high in the RadLV-induced and low in the radiation-induced primary tumors.These results suggest that antitumor CTL generated under conventional MLTC conditions are largely stimulated by and directed at virus-related antigens not necessarily associated with the malignant state of the cell.     

Effects of radiation on the environment: a need to question old paradigms and enhance collaboration among radiation biologists and radiation ecologists

A historical perspective is given of the current paradigm that does not explicitly protect nonhuman biota from radiation but instead relies on the concept that if dose limits are set to protect humans, then the environment is automatically protected as well. We summarize recent international questioning of this paradigm and briefly present three frameworks for protecting biota that are being considered by the U.S. Department of Energy, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, and the International Commission on Radiological Protection. We point out a controversial component in each of the three frameworks and suggest topics that need additional research. We emphasize that to properly address radiation protection of the environment, we need to understand how effects are integrated across different levels of biological organization. We caution that the proposed use of molecular end points to estimate ecological risks from radioactive contamination is applicable only if we understand the extent of the impact that molecular damage has on individual organisms and populations of exposed biota. To accomplish the latter, enhanced collaborations are required among the traditionally separate disciplines of radiation biology and radiation ecology.     

Neutron, proton, and photonuclear cross-sections for radiation therapy and radiation protection

I review recent work at Los Alamos undertaken to evaluate neutron, proton, and photonuclear cross-sections up to 150 MeV (to 250 MeV for protons), based on experimental data and nuclear model calculations. These data are represented in the ENDF format and can be used in computer codes to simulate radiation transport. They permit calculations of absorbed dose in the body from therapy beams, and through use of kerma coefficients allow absorbed dose to be estimated for a given neutron energy distribution. In radiation protection, these data can be used to determine shielding requirements in accelerator environments and to calculate neutron, proton, gamma-ray, and radionuclide production. Illustrative comparisons of the evaluated cross-section and kerma coefficient data with measurements are given.     

Effect of laser radiation and combined ionizing and laser radiation on the cell-division time of bacteria

Irradiation of E. coli K-12 cells of the wild-type AB 1157 strain with helium-neon continuous laser radiation leads to a temporary delay in their division. The delay was found to be the same in cells exposed to ionizing radiation alone and in cells exposed to a combination of ionizing and laser radiation.     

Biodosimetry and assessment of radiation dose

Aim

When investigating radiation accidents, it is very important to determine the exposition dose to the individuals. In the case of exposures over 1 Gy, clinicians may expect deterministic effects arising the following weeks and months, in these cases dose estimation will help physicians in the planning of therapy. Nevertheless, for doses below 1 Gy, biodosimetry data are important due to the risk of developing late stochastic effects. Finally, some accidental overexposures are lack of physical measurements and the only way of quantifying dose is by biological dosimetry.

Background

The analysis of chromosomal aberrations by different techniques is the most developed method of quantifying dose to individuals exposed to ionising radiations.^1,2 Furthermore, the analysis of dicentric chromosomes observed in metaphases from peripheral lymphocytes is the routine technique used in case of acute exposures to assess radiation doses.

Materials and methods

Solid stain of chromosomes is used to determine dicentric yields for dose estimation. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for translocations analysis is used when delayed sampling or suspected chronically irradiation dose assessment. Recommendations in technical considerations are based mainly in the IAEA Technical Report No. 405.²

Results

Experience in biological dosimetry at Gregorio Marañón General Hospital is described, including own calibration curves used for dose estimation, background studies and real cases of overexposition.

Conclusion

Dose assessment by biological dosimeters requires a large previous standardization work and a continuous update. Individual dose assessment involves high qualification professionals and its long time consuming, therefore requires specific Centres. For large mass casualties cooperation among specialized Institutions is needed.