Xylitol production from D-xylose byCandida guillermondii: Fermentation behaviour

Summary The ability ofCandida guillermondii to produce xylitol from xylose and to ferment individual non xylose hemicellulosic derived sugars was investigated in microaerobic conditions. Xylose was converted into xylitol with a yield of 0,63 g/g and ethanol was produced in negligible amounts. The strain did not convert glucose, mannose and galactose into their corresponding polyols but only into ethanol and cell mass. By contrast, fermentation of arabinose lead to the formation of arabitol. On D-xylose medium,Candida guillermondii exhibited high yield and rate of xylitol production when the initial sugar concentration exceeded 110 g/l. A final xylitol concentration of 221 g/l was obtained from 300 g/l D-xylose with a yield of 82,6% of theoretical and an average specific rate of 0,19 g/g.h.Nomenclature Q_p average volumetric productivity of xylitol (g xylitol/l per hour) - q_p average specific productivity of xylitol (g xylitol/g of cells per hour) - So initial xylose concentration (g/l) - tf incubation time (hours) - Y_P/S xylitol yield (g of xylitol produced/g of xylose utilized) - Y_E/S ethanol yield (g of ethanol produced/g of substrate utilized) - Y_X/S cells yield (g of cells/g of substrate utilized) - specific growth rate coefficient (h^–1) - _max maximum specific growth rate coefficient (h^–1)     

The reduction of xylose to xylitol by Candida guilliermondii and Candida parapsilosis: Incidence of oxygen and pH

Summary The ability of C. guilliermondii and C. parapsilosis to ferment xylose to xylitol was evaluated under different oxygen transfer rates in order to enhance the xylitol yield. In C. guilliermondii, a maximal xylitol yield of 0.66 g/g was obtained when oxygen transfer rate was 2.2 mmol/l.h. Optimal conditions to produce xylitol by C. parapsilosis (0.75 g/g) arose from cultures at pH 4.75 with 0.4 mmoles of oxygen/l.h. The response of the yeasts to anaerobic conditions has shown that oxygen was required for xylose metabolism.Nomenclature max maximum specific growth rate (per hour) - qSmax maximum specific rate of xylose consumption (g xylose per g dry biomass per hour) - qpmax maximum specific productivity of xylitol (g xylitol per g dry biomass per hour) - Qp average volumetric productivity of xylitol (g xylitol per liter per hour) - Y_P/S xylitol yield (g xylitol per g substrate utilized) - Y_P'/S glycerol yield (g glycerol per g substrate utilized) - Y_X/S biomass yield (g dry biomass per g substrate utilized)     

Combined alcoholic fermentation of D-xylose and D-glucose by four selected microbial strains: Process considerations in relation to ethanol tolerance

Summary As components of combined fermentation of both glucose and xylose to ethanol by separated or coculture processes, the effects of initial sugar concentrations on the fermentative performances ofPichia stipitis Y7124,Candida shehatae ATCC 22984,Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS1200 andZymomonas mobilis ATCC10988 were investigated. From the characteristics of sugar and produced ethanol tolerances the most suitable microorganisms for the achievement of glucose and xylose fermentations have been selected with respect to different fermentation schemes.Nomenclature Tf fermentation time (hours) - Ef ethanol concentration (g/l) - Y_P/S ethanol yield (g of ethanol produced/g of sugar used) - qp average specific productivity of ethanol (g ethanol/g of cells per hour) - max maximum specific growth rate (h^–1)     

The oxygen requirements of yeasts for the fermentation of d-xylose and d-glucose to ethanol

Summary The effect of oxygen availability on d-xylose and D-glucose metabolism by Pichia stipitis, Candida shehatae and Pachysolen tannophilus was investigated. Oxygen was not required for fermentation of d-xylose or d-glucose, but stimulated the ethanol production rate from both sugars. Under oxygen-limited conditions, the highest ethanol yield coefficient (Y_e/s) of 0.47 was obtained on d-xylose with. P. stipitis, while under similar conditions C. shehatae fermented d-xylose most rapidly with a specific productivity (q_pmax) of 0.32 h^-1. Both of these yeasts fermented d-xylose better and produced less xylitol than. P. tannophilus. Synthesis of polyols such as xylitol, arabitol, glycerol and ribitol reduced the ethanol yield in some instances and was related to the yeast strain, carbon source and oxygen availability. In general, these yeasts fermented d-glucose more rapidly than d-xylose. By contrast Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermented d-glucose at least three-fold faster under similar conditions.Nomenclature q_pmax maximum specific rate of ethanol production (g ethanol per g dry biomass per hour) - Y_e/s ethanol yield (g ethanol per g substrate utilized) - Y_p/s polyol yield (g polyol per g substrate utilized) - Y_x/s biomass yield (g dry biomass per g substrate utilized) - _max maximum specific growth rate (per hour)     

Ethanol fermentation using a fructose-negative mutant of Zymomonas mobilis

Summary The fermentation of an equimolar mixture of glucose and fructose into ethanol and sorbitol by a fructose negative mutant of Zymomonas mobilis is analysed using a recently described methodology (Ait-Abdelkader and Baratti, Biotechnol. Tech. 1993,329–334) based on polynomial fitting and calculation of instantaneous and overall parameters. These parameters are utilized to describe this mixed-substrate mixed-product fermentation.Nomenclature X biomass concentration, g/l - S total sugar concentration, g/l - Glu glucose concentration, g/l - Fru fructose concentration, g/l - Sor sorbitol concentration, g/l - P ethanol concentration, g/l - t fermentation time, h - specific growth rate, h^-1 - q_s specific sugar uptake rate, g/g.h - q_g specific glucose uptake rate, g/g.h - q_F specific fructose uptake rate, g/g.h - q_P specific ethanol productivity, g/g.h - q_Sor specific sorbitol productivity, g/g.h - Y_X/S biomass yield on total sugar, g/g - Y_P/S ethanol yield on total sugar, g/g - Y_Sor/S sorbitol yield on total sugar, g/g - Y_Sor/F sorbitol yield on fructose, (g/g) - Y_P/G ethanol yield on glucose, (g/g)     

Performance,kinetics, and substrate utilization in a continuous yeast fermentation with cell recycle by ultrafiltration membranes

Summary A continuous single stage yeast fermentation with cell recycle by ultrafiltration membranes was operated at various recycle ratios. Cell concentration was increased 10.6 times, and ethanol concentration and fermentor productivity both 5.3 times with 97% recycle as compared to no recycle. Both specific growth rate and specific ethanol productivity followed the exponential ethanol inhibition form (specific productivity was constant up to 37.5 g/l of ethanol before decreasing), similar to that obtained without recycle, but with greater inhibition constants most likely due to toxins retained in the system at hight recycle ratios.By analyzing steady state data, the fractions of substrate used for cell growth, ethanol formation, and what which were wasted were accounted for. Yeast metabolism varied from mostly aerobic at low recycle ratios to mostly anaerobic at high recycle ratios at a constant dissolved oxygen concentration of 0.8 mg/kg. By increasing the cell recycle ratio, wasted substrate was reduced. When applied to ethanol fermentation, the familiar terminology of substrate used for Maintenance must be used with caution: it is not the same as the wasted substrate reported here.A general method for determining the best recycle ratio is presented; a balance among fermentor productivity, specific productivity, and wasted substrate needs to be made in recycle systems to approach an optimal design.Nomenclature B Bleed flow rate, l/h - C _T Concentration of toxins, arbitrary units - D Dilution rate, h^-1 - F Filtrate or permeate flow rate, removed from system, l/h - F _o Total feed flow rate to system, l/h - K _s Monod form constant, g/l - P Product (ethanol) concentration, g/l - P _o Ethanol concentration in feed, g/l - PP} Adjusted product concentration, g/l - PD Fermentor productivity, g/l-h - R Recycle ratio, F/F _o - S Substrate concentration in fermentor, g/l - S _o Substrate concentration in feed, g/l - V Working volume of fermentor, l - V _MB Viability based on methylene blue test - X Cell concentration, g dry cell/l - X _o Cell concentration in feed, g/l - Y _ATP Cellular yield from ATP, g cells/mol ATP - Y _ATPS Yield of ATP from substrate, mole ATP/mole glucose - Y _G True growth yield or maximum yield of cells from substrate, g cell/g glucose - Y _P Maximum theoretical yield of ethanol from glucose, 0.511 g ethanol/g glucose - Y _P/S Experimental yield of product from substrate, g ethanol/g glucose - Y _x/s Experimental yield of cells from substrate, g cell/g glucose - S _NP/X Non-product associated substrate utilization, g glucose/g cell - k ₁, k₂, k₃, k₄ Constants - k ₁ ^APP , k ₂ ^APP Apparent k ₁, k₃ - k ₁ ^TRUE True k ₁ - m Maintenance coefficient, g glucose/g cell-h - m ^* Coefficient of substrate not used for growth nor for ethanol formation, g glucose/g cell-h - Specific growth rate, g cells/g cells-h, reported as h^-1 - _m Maximum specific growth rate, h^-1 - v Specific productivity, g ethanol/g cell-h, reported as h^-1 - v _m Maximum specific productivity, h^-1     

Ethanol fermentation using a glucose negative mutant ofZymomonas mobilis

Summary The fermentation of an equimolar mixture of glucose and fructose into ethanol and sorbitol by a glucose negative mutant ofZymomonas mobilis was monitored. The results were analyzed using a recently described method based on polynomial fitting and calculation of intantaneous and overall parameters. These parameters described well the physiology of this mixed-substrate mixed-product fermentation. Growth of the mutant was greatly inhibited on this medium. Fructose was quantitatively converted into sorbitol while glucose was oxidized into gluconic acid .This latter product was utilized as substrate for cell growth and ethanol production.Nomenclature X biomass concentration, g/l - S total sugar concentration, g/l - Glu glucose concentration, g/l - Fru fructose concentration, g/l - Sor sorbitol concentration, g/l - P ethanol concentration, g/l - t fermentation time, h - specific growth rate, h^-1 - q_s specific sugar uptake rate, g/g.h - q_G specific glucose uptake rate, g/g.h - q_F specific fructose uptake rate, g/g.h - q_P specific ethanol productivity, g/g.h - q_Sor specific sorbitol productivity, g/g.h - Y_X/S biomass yield on total sugar, g/g - Y_P/S ethanol yield on total sugar, g/g - Y_Sor/S sorbitol yield on total sugar, g/g - y_Sor/f sorbitol yield on fructose, g/g - Y_P/G ethanol yield on glucose, g/g     

Batch fermentation kinetics of ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis on cellulose hydrolysate

Summary Growth and ethanol production by three strains (MSN77, thermotolerant, SBE15, osmotolerant and wild type ZM4) of the bacterium Zymomonas mobilis were tested in a rich medium containing the hexose fraction from a cellulose hydrolysate (Aspen wood). The variations of yield and kinetic parameters with fermentation time revealed an inhibition of growth by the ethanol produced. This inhibition may result from the increase in medium osmolality due to ethanol formation from glucose.Nomenclature S glucose concentration (g/L) - C conversion of glucose (%) - t fermentation time (h) - q_S specific glucose uptake rate (g/g.h) - q_p specific ethanol productivity (g/g.h) - Q_p volumetric ethanol productivity (g/L.h) - Q_X volumetric biomass productivity (g/L.h) - Y_X/S biomass yield (g/g) - Y_p/S ethanol yield (g/g) - specific growth rate (h^-1)     

Effect of substrate concentration on ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis on cellulose hydrolysate

Summary A cellulose hydrolysate from Aspen wood, containing mainly glucose, was fermented into ethanol by a thermotolerant strain MSN77 of Zymomonas mobilis. The effect of the hydrolysate concentration on fermentation parameters was investigated. Growth parameters (specific growth rate and biomass yield) were inhibited at high hydrolysate concentrations. Catabolic parameters (specific glucose uptake rate, specific ethanol productivity and ethanol yield) were not affected. These effects could be explained by the increase in medium osmolality. The results are similar to those described for molasses based media. Strain MSN77 could efficiently ferment glucose from Aspen wood up to a concentration of 60 g/l. At higher concentration, growth was inhibited.Nomenclature S glucose concentration (g/l) - X biomass concentration (g/l) - P ethanol concentration (g/l) - C conversion of glucose (%) - t fermentation time (h) - q_S specific glucose uptake rate (g/g.h) - q_p specific ethanol productivity (g/g.h) - YINX/S biomass yield (g/g) - Y_p/S ethanol yield (g/g) - specific growth rate (h^-1)     

Regulation of intracellular H+ balance in Zymomonas mobilis 113 during the shift from anaerobic to aerobic conditions

Summary The energetics, enzyme activities and end-product synthesis of Zymomonas mobilis 113 in continuous culture were studied after the shift from an anaerobic to an aerobic environment. Aeration diminished ethanol yield and lactic acid concentration, but increased glucose consumption rate and production of acetic acid. After the shift to aerobic conditions reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) [NAD(P)H]-oxidase activity was stimulated. Washed cell suspensions consumed oxygen with glucose, lactate and ethanol as substrates. The aerobic Z. mobilis 113 regulated their intracellular redox balance by production and reoxidation of the end products, coupled with the formation of NAD(P)H. An increase in transmembrane pH gradient (pH) and a decrease in intracellular ATP concentration were observed after the shift to aerobic conditions. At low medium redox potential (Eh) values the H⁺ balance was regulated in an energy-independent way via end-product excretion. Under aerobic conditions this was supplemented by ATP-dependent H⁺ excretion by the membrane H⁺-ATPase.Abbreviations D dilution rate (h^-1) - S ₀ initial glucose concentration (g/l) - Y _x/s growth yield (g/mol) - Y _p/s product yield (g/g) - q _s specific rate of substrate utilization (g/g per hour) - q _p specific rate of ethanol formation (g/g per hour) - qo ₂ specific rate of CO₂ production (mmol/g per hour) - specific growth rate (h^-1) - X dry biomass concentration (g/l) - Eh redox potential of culture medium (mV) - pH transmembrane pH gradient (pH units) - pH_in intracellular pH - SASE sum of activities of specific enmymes of Entner-Doudoroff pathway     

The fermentation of hexose and pentose sugars by Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis

Summary The fermentation by Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis of xylitol and the various sugars which are liberated upon hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass was investigated. Both yeasts produced ethanol from d-glucose, d-mannose, d-galactose and d-xylose. Only P. stipitis fermented d-cellobiose, producing 6.5 g·l^-1 ethanol from 20 g·l^-1 cellobiose within 48 h. No ethanol was produced from l-arabinose, l-rhamnose or xylitol. Diauxie was evident during the fermentation of a sugar mixture. Following the depletion of glucose, P. stipitis fermented galactose, mannose, xylose and cellobiose simultaneously with no noticeable preceding lag period. A similar fermentation pattern was observed with C. shehatae, except that it failed to utilize cellobiose even though it grew on cellobiose when supplied as the sole sugar. P. stipitis produced considerably more ethanol from the sugar mixture than C. shehatae, primarily due to its ability to ferment cellobiose. In general P. stipitis exhibited a higher volumetric rate and yield of ethanol production. This yeast fermented glucose 30–50% more rapidly than xylose, whereas the rates of ethanol production from these two sugars by C. shehatae were similar. P. stipitis had no absolute vitamin requirement for xylose fermentation, but biotin and thiamine enhanced the rate and yield of ethanol production significantly.Nomenclature _max Maximum specific growth rate, h^-1 - Q _p Maximum volumetric rate of ethanol production, calculated from the slope of the ethanol vs. time curve, g·(l·h)^-1 - q _p Maximum specific rate of ethanol production, g·(g cells·h) - Y _p/s Ethanol yield coefficient, g ethanol·(g substrate utilized)^-1 - Y _x/s Cell yield coefficient, g biomass·(g substrate utilized)^-1 - E Efficiency of substrate utilization, g substrate consumed·(g initial substrate)^-1·100     

Effect of time delay in specific growth rate on the periodic operation of bioreactors with input multiplicities

The effect of time delay in specific growth rate () on the periodic operation of bioreactors with input multiplicities is theoretically analyzed for productivity improvement. A periodic rectangular pulse is applied either in feed substrate concentration (S_f) or in dilution rate (D). Periodic operation under feed substrate concentration cycling gives improvement in productivity at lower value of ¯S_f of the two steady-state multiplicities of S_f only when the time delay in is larger. Whereas the larger value of ¯S_f gives improvement in average productivity for all values of time delay. Dilution rate (D) cycling gives an improvement in average productivity particularly for larger time delay in . This improvement in average productivity is obtained only at smaller value of dilution rate out of the two steady-state input multiplicities of D.List of Symbols D 1/h dilution rate - F memory function - g dummy variable - K_i g/l substrate inhibition constant - K_m g/l substrate saturation constant - P g/l product concentration - P_m g/l product saturation constant - Q g/(hl) product cell produced per unit time - S g/l substrate concentration - S_f g/l feed substrate concentration - S_f,p g/l feed substrate concentration during fraction of a period - X g/l biomass concentration - Y_X/S g/g cell mass yield - w variable either S or Z - Z g/l weighted average of substrate concentration Greek Letters 1/h time delay parameter - ₁ , ₂ product yield parameters, g/g and 1/h - pulse width expressed as a fraction of a period - 1/h specific growth rate - _m 1/h maximum specific growth rate - h period of oscillation - – average value     

Ethanol fermentation by flocculating yeast: Performance and stability dependence on a critical fermentation rate

Summary A system coupling fermentor and decantor permitted strong accumulation of yeast flocs that were homogeneously suspended in the reactional volume. At 100–190 g/l glucose feed practically total substrate conversion was attained. At 130 g/l glucose feed the highest productivity (18.4 g.l.h) and the highest ethanol yield (90.6%) were reached with biomass levels of 80–90 g/l. We observed that the stability of this system is limited when a critical fermentation rate (D.S_o) close to 39–40 g/l.h (with corresponding ethanol productivities of 19–20 g/l.h) is reached. Higher fermentation rates provoked de-flocculation and lost of biomass.Symbols D dilution rate (h^–1) - E ethanol (g/l) - S_r residual substrate (g/l) - S_o substrate in the feed (g/l) - X biomass (g/l) - ethanol yield (%) - DS_o fermentation rate (g/l.h) (for S_r0) - P_E ethanol productivity (g/l.h)     

Performance assessment of two patent strains ofZymomonas mobilis in batch and continuous fermentations

Summary The performance ofZymomonas mobilis strains ATCC 31821 and ATCC 31823 was assessed in batch and continuous culture. In batch culture using a medium containing 250 g/l glucose, identical maximum specific growth rates of 0.16/h were found, though final biomass concentration and growth yield were significantly lower for ATCC 31 823 than for ATCC 31 821. Final ethanol concentrations in this medium were about 110 g/l vor both organisms. In continuous culture at increasing dilution rates using a medium containing 100 g/l glucose, no significant differences were seen between the two strains with respect to the fermentation parameters studied. For ATCC 31 821, maximum rates of glucose uptake (Q_s) and ethanol produktion (Q_p) of 8.7 g glu/g/h and 4.4 g eth/g/h, respectively, were found. Both strains showed a similar performance at a fixed dilution rate of 0.1/h, where maximum ethanol concentrations of about 68 g/l were reached at a feed glucose concentration of about 139 g/l. At this dilution rate the maximum values of Q_s and Q_p were about 5.8 g glu/g/h and 2.8 g eth/g/h, respectively. Test tube experiments showed that growth, measured as optical density, decreased with increasing concentrations of exogenous ethanol with complete inhibition of growth at ethanol concentrations >8% (v/v). As evidenced by the results presented here, we have been unable to practice the invention as described in U.S. Patent 4,403,034 (Rogers and Tribe 1983).Nomenclature D Dilution rate, 1/h - _max maximum specific growth rate, 1/h - S_R Initial substrate concentration, g glucose/1 - S Residual substrate concentration, g glucose/1 - S₀ Effluent substrate concentration, g glucose/1 - X Blomass concentration; g cells/l - OD₆₂₀ Optical density at 620 nm, dimensionless - [P] Product concentration, g ethanol/1 - Y_x/s Growth yield, g cells/g glucose used - Y_p/s Product yield, g ethanol/g glucose used - %, Yield Percentage yield, Y_p/sx100/Y _p ^s/max =Y_p/sx100/0.51 - Q_s Specific rate of glucose uptake, g glucose/g cells/h - Q_p Specific rate of ethanol formation, g ethanol/g cells/h - m_e Maintenance energy coefficient, g glucose/g cells/h - VP Volumetric productivity, g ethanol/l/h - t Fermentation time, h     

Effect of growth temperature on the morphology and performance ofZymomonas mobilis ATCC 29 191 in batch and continuous culture

Summary Increasing the temperature in chemostat culture ofZymomonas mobilis ATCC 29 191 with low and high glucose concentrations was found to result in a decreasing frequency of septation leading to the formation of long filaments and in increasing outer membrane blebbing. Whether this effect is strain specific or universal inZymomonas is, unknown. Improvements in the fermentation kinetics could be achieved at elevated temperatures, with an optimum at 33°C. Temperatures >30°C induced uncoupled growth in chemostat cultures ofZ. mobilis ATCC 29 191. The results of this study emphasize the importance of temperature regulation in optimizing the performance of continuous fermentations withZymomonas.Nomenclature D Dilution rate, 1/h - _max Maximum specific growth rate, 1/h - S _R Initial substrate concentration, g glucose/1 - S Amount of glucose consumed, g glucose/1 - S ₀ Effluent substrate concentration, g glucose/1 - X Biomass concentration - g cells/1 - [P] Amount of product formed, g ethanol/1 - [P] Product concentrations, g ethanol/l - Y _x/s Growth yield, g cells/g glucose used - Y _p/s Product yield, g ethanol/g glucose used - O _s Specific rate of glucose uptake, g glucose/g cells/h - Q _p Specific rate of ethanol formation, g ethanol/g cells/h - VP Volumetric productivity, g ethanol/1/h - t Fermentation time, h Corresponding author     

Batch xylitol production by<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Candida guilliermondii</Emphasis> FTI 20037 from sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolyzate at controlled pH values

Batch fermentation of sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolyzate by the yeast Candida guilliermondii FTI 20037 was performed using controlled pH values (3.5, 5.5, 7.5). The maximum values of xylitol volumetric productivity (Q _p=0.76 g/l h) and xylose volumetric consumption (Q _s=1.19 g/l h) were attained at pH 5.5. At pH 3.5 and 7.5 the Q _p value decreased by 66 and 72%, respectively. Independently of the pH value, Y _x/s decreased with the increase in Y _p/s suggesting that the xylitol bioconversion improves when the cellular growth is limited. At the highest pH value (7.5), the maximum specific xylitol production value was the lowest (q _pmax=0.085 g/l h.), indicating that the xylose metabolism of the yeast was diverted from xylitol formation to cell growth.List of symbols P _max xylitol concentration (g/l) - Q _x volumetric cell production rate (g/l h) - Q _s volumetric xylose uptake rate (g/l h) - Q _p volumetric xylitol production rate (g/l h) - q _pmax specific xylitol production (g/g h) - q _smax specific xylose uptake rate (g/g h) - _max specific cell growth rate (h^–1) - Y _p/s xylitol yield coefficient, g xylitol per g xylose consumed (g/g) - Y _p/x xylitol yield coefficient, g xylitol per g dry cell mass produced (g/g) - Y _x/s cell yield coefficient, g dry cell mass per g xylose consumed (g/g) - _cell percentage of the cell yield from the theoretical value (%) - _xylitol percentage of xylitol yield from the theoretical value (%)     

Lactose continuous fermentation with cells recycled by ultrafiltration and lactate separation by electrodialysis: model identification

Summary An off-line parameter estimation method has been developed to predict the dynamic behaviour of a continuous lactose fermentation system. The model used is an unstructured model taking into account cell growth, substrate consumption, and metabolite production (lactic acid). This method, based on the Hooke-Jeeves non-linear-programming technique, results in a good estimation of the biological parameters of the model, and so gives a better understanding of the different phenomena involved in lactose fermentation.Nomenclature Cp, Cs, Cz, Dp, Ds, Dz coefficients in system (A) - Fe bioreactor influent flow rate (1/h) - I current in the ED unit (A) - J lactate flux in the ED unit (g/h) - Kd mortality constant (h^-1) - Kp product inhibition constant (g/l) - Ks strbstrate saturation constant (g/l) - P ₀ product concentration in the bioreactor (g/l) - P ₁ product concentration in the D tank (g/l) - P _0r estimation of P ₀ (g/l) - Q ₀ retentate flow rate (UF influent) (1/h) - Q ₁ permeate flow rate (1/h) - Q ₂₂ cell bleed flow rate (1/h) - Q ₃ recycling flow rate in the ED (influent) (1/h) - Se substrate concentration in the influent (g/l) - S ₀ supstrate concentration in the bioreactor (g/l) - S ₁ substrate concentration in tank D (g/l) - S _0r estimation of S ₀ (g/l) - t time (h) - V ₀ fermentation broth volume (1) - V ₁ tank D volume (1) - X ₀ biomass concentration in the bioreactor (g/l) - Y _P/S (=1/Y _S/P) lactic acid yield coefficient (g lactic acid/g lactose consumed) - Y _X/S (=1/Y _S/X) cell yield coefficient (g cells produced/g lactose consumed) - Y _X/Z (=1/Y _Z/X) second cell yield coefficient (g cells produced/g nitrogen consumed) - Y _x, Y _m input mathematical parameters of the linear system (M ₂) - Ze nitrogen concentration in the influent (g/l) - Z ₀ nitrogen concentration in the bioreactor (g/l) - Z ₁ nitrogen concentration in tank D (g/l) - Z _0r estimation of Z ₀ (g/l) - , constants of the Luedeking and Piret's model - specific growth rate (h^-1) - _max maximum specific growth rate (h^-1)     

Ethanol production from sulphuric acid wood hydrolysate ofPinus radiata using free and immobilized cells ofPichia stipitis

Summary Ethanol was produced by a strain ofPichia stipitis adapted to an inhibitory acid wood hydrolysate ofPinus radiata. The best ethanol productivity for batch cultures was 0.21 g/l h at 0.7% ethanol. Varying culture conditions increased ethanol concentration to 0.76%, however the productivity decreased to 0.18 g/l h. A decrease in ethanol concentration in the culture fluid was noted late in the batch which suggested ethanol catabolism. Values of kinetic parameters (K _m,K _s, _max, andV _max) were evaluated for this system. The use of calcium alginate immobilized cells in a continuous-flow stirred tank reactor lead to enhanced fermentative performance, namely a maximum productivity of 0.27 g/l h and 1.13% ethanol yield. The immobilized cells in continuous flow reactors represent an attractive option for fermenting sugars released by sulphuric acid hydrolysis ofP. radiata wood.     

Xylitol formation by Candida boidinii in oxygen limited chemostat culture

Summary Production of xylitol by Candida boidinii NRRL Y-17213 occurs under conditions of an oxygen limitation. The extent to which substrate is converted to xylitol and its coproducts (ethanol, other polyols, acetic acid), and the relative flow rates of substrate to energetic and biosynthetic pathways is controlled by the degree of oxygen limitation.With decrease in oxygen concentration in the inlet gas, for a constant dilution rate of 0.05 1/h. the specific oxygen uptake rate decreased from 1.30 to 0.36 mmol/gh Xylitol was not produced at specific oxygen uptake rates above 0.91 mmol/gh. Upon shift to lower oxygen rates, specific xylitol production rate increased more rapidly than specific ethanol production rate:Nomenclature D dilution rate (1/h) - DOT dissolved oxygen tension (%) - m_o2 maintenance coefficient (mmol O₂/g cell mass h) - q_o2 specific oxygen uptake rate (mmol O₂/g cell mass h) - q_s specific xylose uptake rate (g xylose/g cell mass h) or (mmol xylose/g cell mass h) - q_x specific xylitol production rate (g xylitol/ g cell mass h) or (mmol xylitol/ g cell mass h) - q_e specific ethanol production rate (g ethanol/ g cell mass h) or (mmol ethanol/ g cell mass h) - q_CO2 specific carbon dioxide production rate (mmol CO₂/g cell mass h) - S xylose concentration (g/1) - Y_cm/s cell mass yield coefficient, (g cell mass/mmol xylose) or (g cell mass/ g xylose consumed) - Y_cm/O2 cell mass yield coefficient, (g cell mass/mmol O₂) - Y_X/S xylitol yield coefficient (g xylitol/g xylose consumed) - Y_x/O2 xylitol yield coefficient (g xylitol/mmol O₂) - Y_e/s ethanol yield coefficient (g ethanol/g xylose consumed) - OUR oxygen uptake rate (mmol O₂/1h) - specific growth rate (1/h)     

Anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent and condensation water waste: an overall kinetic model for methane production and substrate utilization

The process of anaerobic digestion is viewed as a series of reactions which can be described kinetically both in terms of substrate utilization and methane production. It is considered that the rate limiting factor in the digestion of complex wastewaters is hydrolysis and this cannot be adequately described using a Monod equation. In contrast readily assimilable wastewaters conform well to this approach. A generalized equation has thus been derived, based on both the Monod and Contois equations, which serves extreme cases. The model was verified experimentally using continuous feed anaerobic digesters treating palm oil mill effluent (POME) and condensation water from a thermal concentration process. POME represents a complex substrate comprising of unhydrolyzed materials whereas the condensation water is predominantly short chain volatile fatty acids. Substrate removal and methane production in both cases could be predicted accurately using the generalized equation presented.List of Symbols A (=K_skY/K_h) Kinetic parameter - B Specific methane yield, 1 of CH₄/g of substrate added B₀ Maximum specific methane yield, 1 of CH₄/g of substrate added at infinity - C Empirical constant in Contois equation - F Volumetric substrate removal rate, g/l day - k Hydrolysed substrate transport rate coefficient, 1/days - K (=YC) Kinetic parameter in Chen-Hashimoto equation - K _h Substrate hydrolysis rate coefficient, 1/days - K _s Half-saturation constant for hydrolysed substrate, g/l - M _v Volumetric methane production rate, 1 of CH₄/l day - MS Mineral solids, g/l - MSS Mineral suspended soilds, g/l - POME Palm oil mill effluent - R (=S_r/S_T0) Refractory coefficient - S _h Concentration of hydrolysed substrate, g/l - S _u Intracellular concentration of hydrolysed substrate, g/l - S ₀ Input biodegradable substrate concentration, g/l - S Biodegradable substrate concentration in the effluent or in the digester, g/l - S _r Refractory feed substrate concentration, g/l - S _T0 (=S₀+S_r) Total feed substrate concentration, g/l - S _T (S+S_r) Total substrate concentration in the effluent, g/l - TS Total solids, g/l - TSS Total suspended solids, g/l - VFA Total volatile fatty acids, g/l - VS Volatile solids, g/l - VSS Volatile suspended solids, g/l - X Biomass concentration, g/l - Y Biomass yield coefficient, biomass/substrate mass - Hydraulic retention time, days. - Specific growth rate of microorganisms, l/days - _m Maximum specific growth rate of microorganisms, l/days The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Departamento de Postgrado y Especialización del CSIC and to the Consejería de Educación y Ciencia de la Junta de Andalucia for their financial support of this work.