Ultrastructural observations on the oogenesis of Triops cancriformis (Crustacea,Notostraca)

Summary Each ovarian follicle of Triops cancriformis is four-celled; these cells (one oocyte and three nurse cells) are interconnected by cytoplasmic bridges. In the course of differentiation, the nurse cells are early recognizable; they increase in size more than the oocyte and their nuclei contain many nucleoli. For the first time in Arthropoda, yolk globules are reported to be present in nurse cell cytoplasm; these globules arise from the smooth endoplasmic reticulum. The functional significance of the intercellular bridges and the trophic role of the nurse cells are discussed.The authors are grateful to Dr. Bruno Sabelli for his support and to Mr. Francesco Monte for his technical assistance     

Roles of cell-to-cell communication in development

Possible roles of cell-to-cell communication mediated by intercellular bridges and gap junctions in development of the female gamete and embryo are discussed. Synchronization of cell cycle events is presumably a role for intercellular bridges between germ cells. The follicle of the Cecropia moth reveals that an electrical polarity exists between nurse cells and oocytes which are connected by intercellular bridges and this polarity may generate differences that result in differentiation of the oogonia to become either the oocyte or nurse cells. Gap junction-mediated transfer of cyclic AMP, made in response to gonadotropin stimulation, between granulosa cells is discussed as a mechanism that allows cells within a tissue to respond to an external stimulus even though all cells in that tissue may not be exposed to the stimulus. A nutritional role for heterologous cell communication between follicle cells and the oocyte in oocyte growth is presented as an example of how gap junction-mediated communication can allow one cell type to influence the behavior of another cell type. During development, a restriction in communication between differentiating cells is frequently observed. Examples of this phenomenon in a mammal and an insect are presented.     

POLARIZED INTERCELLULAR BRIDGES IN OVARIAN FOLLICLES OF THE CECROPIA MOTH

Fluorescein-labeled rabbit serum globulin was injected into vitellogenic oocytes of the cecropia moth. Though the label spread throughout the ooplasm in less than 30 min, it was unable even after 2 h to cross the complex of intercellular bridges connecting the oocyte to its seven nurse cells. After injection into a single nurse cell, fluorescence was detected in the oocyte adjacent to the bridge complex within 3 min and had spread throughout the ooplasm in 30 min. Here also, the cell bodies of the six uninjected nurse cells remained nonfluorescent. Four of the nurse cells are not bridged directly to the oocyte but only through the apical ends of their siblings. Unidirectional movement must therefore occur in the apical cytoplasm of the nurse cells, as well as in the intercellular bridges. The nurse cells of healthy follicles had an intracellular electrical potential -40 mV relative to blood or dissecting solution, while oocytes measured -30 mV. A mV difference was also detected by direct comparison between a ground electrode in one cell and a recording electrode in the other. Three conditions were found in which the 10 mV difference was reduced or reversed in polarity. In all three cases fluorescent globulin was able in some degree to cross the bridges from the oocyte to the nurse cells.     

Cell fusions during formation of the oocyte-nurse chamber complex in the ovary of the dipteran insectMycophila speyeri

Summary Formation of the oocyte-nurse chamber complex in the cecidomyid insectMycophila speyeri was studied in situ and in vitro by electron microscopy and time-lapse cinemicrography. At the end of the oogonial divisions each oogonium passes through a mitotic division with incomplete cytokinesis. This division gives rise to two sister cells, a prospective nurse cell and the oocyte, which remain connected by an intercellular bridge. In two phases of nurse chamber formation, first four and then (usually) one or two ovarian cells of mesodermal origin fuse with the prospective nurse cell. This results in a syncytial nurse chamber containing one germ-cell-derived nucleus and a varying number of mesoderm-cell-derived nuclei. In two subsequent fusion steps, two mesodermal cells fuse with the oocyte, giving rise to an oocyte containing one large and two small nuclei. Thus, four fusion steps lead to the formation of the complete oocyte-nurse chamber complex. Characteristics of the cell fusions are: (1) in each case one or more somatic cell(s) fuse with a germ-line cell and (2) cell contact between the fusing cells is established by the somatic cell, which approaches the germ-line cells.     

Comparative Spiralian Oogenesis--Structural Aspects: An Overview

Considerable variety exists in ovarian structure and cellularinteraction in spiralians. During their development the eggsof Dwpatra cuprea, are associated with nurse cells; there areno follicle cells in this species. The nurse cells have prominentnuclei and connect to oocytes via cytoplasmic bridges throughwhich ribosomes, mitochondria and other inclusions pass. Morecommonly, follicle cells surround a portion of, or entire, oocytesin many species of spiralians. Usually, as in Ilyanassa, theyhave a well developed compliment of organelles. The structureand distribution of organelles within follicle cells impliesthat they are functionally active, but precisely in what mannerduring oogenesis is poorly understood. Other cell types, suchas Leydig and interstitial cells also seem to play a role inoogenesis. Within the oocyte, a host of components includingyolk, lipid, mitochondria, ribosomes, membranous cisternae,cortical granules, etc. are accumulated. Autosynthetic yolkformation is prevalent among spiralians. Surface differentiationincludes microvillar development. This may be uniform in someeggs or restricted to certain regions (e.g., the animal hemisphere)in other oocytes. Oocyte-follicle cell interactions change duringoogenesis. The topographical association of the oocyte withother ovarian cells influences subsequent animal-vegetal polarityand other ooplasmic differences. Examples of ooplasmic localizationsare discussed. Conventional EM has revealed no unusual corticalstructure in many oocytes although occasionally microtubulesand microfilaments are present.     

Primordial germ cells and early stages of oogenesis in Ophryotrocha puerilis (Polychaeta,Dorvillediae)

Summary Each setigerous segment of the protandric polychaete Ophryotrocha puerilis contains two primordial germ cells. A ventral furrow in the gut wall together with the peritoneal lining of the gut forms a genital blood vessel. The gonocytes are located within the peritoneum of this genital blood vessel. At sexual maturity the gonocytes undergo a proliferation cycle, the first division of which gives rise to a cell which is extruded into a forming outpocketing of the coelomic lining. The stem cell remains within the peritoneum. Inside the forming gonad the detached cell goes through a series of four mitotic divisions. The resulting 16 cells are interconnected by cytoplasmic bridges. These bridges are arranged in a very regular pattern which allows the mitotic cycles to be followed. While remaining still within the gonad the 16 cells begin to synthesize yolk and to take up exogenous yolk precursors. At this stage a differentiation into oocytes and nurse cells becomes visible. The oocytes deposit yolk platelets of the definitive size whereas the polyploid nurse cells produce only small yolk bodies that are passed to the adjacent oocytes. In a later stage the cell bridges between adjacent nurse cells are cut and pairs of one oocyte and one nurse cell are released to the coelomic cavity during breakdown of the gonadal sac. Oocyte-nurse cell-complexes then freely float in the coelomic fluid. The proliferation of gonadal cells is well synchronized within one segment. In anterior segments, however, gonadal proliferation usually begins earlier than in posterior segments but smaller oocytes in posterior segments catch up within a few days. Finally a batch of oocytes is produced in which all the oocytes are of the same size (120 m). The origin of the primordial germ cells remains unknown.     

Ultrastructure and function of nurse cells in phthirapterans. Possible function of ramified nurse cell nuclei in the cytoplasm transfer

The structure of nurse cells as well as the distribution of cytoskeletal elements (actin filaments, microtubules) in three representatives of phthirapterans: the pig louse, Haematopinus suis (Anoplura) and bird lice, Eomenacanthus stramineus, Columbicola columbae (Mallophaga) were investigated. All three species have polytrophic-meroistic ovaries which means that each oocyte remains connected with a group of nurse cells via specialized cytoplasmic canals-intercellular bridges (ring canals). Throughout vitellogenesis, various macromolecules as well as organelles (mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum vesicles, ribosomes) are transferred from the nurse cells to the oocyte. During this flow, the nurse cell nuclei do not enter the oocyte and are retained in the cell centers. In holometabolous insects (e.g. Drosophila, hymenopterans), the central position of nurse cell nuclei is maintained by cytoskeletal elements (actin filaments or microtubules). In the investigated species, the nurse cells are equipped with large, highly extended (irregularly lobed) nuclei. The inner nuclear membrane is lined with a relatively thick layer of nuclear lamina. Ultrastructural analysis and staining with rhodamine-labeled phalloidin revealed that the nurse cell cytoskeleton is poorly developed and represented only by: (1) single microtubules in the perinuclear cytoplasm; and (2) the F-actin layer in the cortical cytoplasm. In the light of this, we postulate that in phthirapterans the position of nurse cell nuclei during the cytoplasm transfer is maintained not by the cytoskeletal elements, but by a largely extended shape of the nuclei (i.e. their elongated extensions).     

Electrically mediated protein movement inDrosophila follicles

Summary Distribution of rhodamine-conjugated lysozyme injected into the sixteen-cell syncytium comprising the germ-line portion of theDrosophila follicle is shown to be affected by charge. Positive molecules are able to migrate through intercellular bridges from the oocyte to the nurse cells, but are unable to migrate detectably from nurse cells to the oocyte. Their negatively charged counterparts can move from the nurse cells to the oocyte, but are unable to traverse the intercellular bridges in the counter direction. This charge-dependent movement of molecules is accompanied by an electrical potential difference, focused across the nurse cell-oocyte bridges, which makes the nurse cells negatively charged to the oocyte. The addition of insect hemolymph to the physiological salt solution in which the experiments were performed resulted in only a small increase in the transmembrane resistance, but enhanced the potential difference between oocyte and nurse cells from 0.2±0.3 (SE) mV (nurse cells negative) to 2.3±0.45 (SE) mV (nurse cells negative). Supported by NSF Grant # DB-18617     

The cytology of the vitellogenic stages of oogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. General staging characteristics

The cytology of the vitellogenic stages in the development of the oocyte of Drosophila melanogaster has been studied using whole mounts and sections of plastic-embedded ovaries and single egg chambers for light microscopy and cytochemistry. The migrations, changes in morphology, and synthetic products of the follicle cells are described as a function of developmental stage. The follicle cells synthesize the egg coverings, the vitelline and chorionic membranes, and elaborate the micropyle and dorsal chorionic appendages. The changing structure of the nurse cell nucleus and changes in organelle composition of its cytoplasm are described. The nurse cells synthesize ribosomes, lipid droplets, and mitochondria. These components pass through the ring canal system into the oocyte, which increases in volume some 200,000 times during its 78 hours of development.     

Oogenesis in four species of Piscicola (Hirudinea, Rhynchobdellida)

Piscicola has a pair of elongated sac-shaped ovaries. Inside the ovaries are numerous small somatic cells and regularly spherical egg follicles. Each follicle is composed of three types of cells: many (average 30) germ cells (cystocytes) interconnected by intercellular bridges in clones (cysts), one intermediate cell, and three to five outer follicle cells (envelope cells). Each germ cell in a clone has one intercellular bridge connecting it to the central anucleate cytoplasmic mass, the cytophore. Each cluster of germ cells is completely embedded inside a single huge somatic follicle cell, the intermediate (interstitial) cell. The most spectacular feature of the intermediate cell is its development of a system of intracytoplasmic canals apparently formed of invaginations of its cell membrane. Initially the complex of germ cell cluster + intermediate cell is enclosed within an envelope composed of squamous cells. As oogenesis progresses the envelope cells gradually degenerate. All the germ cells that have terminated their mitotic divisions are of similar size and enter meiotic prophase, but one of the cystocytes promptly starts to grow faster and differentiates into the oocyte, whereas the remaining cystocytes withdraw from meiosis and become nurse cells (trophocytes). Numerous mitochondria, ER, and a vast amount of ribosomes are transferred from the trophocytes via the cytophore toward the oocyte. Eventually the oocyte ingests all the content of the cytophore, and the trophocytes degenerate. Little vitellogenesis takes place; the oocyte gathers nutrients in the form of small lipid droplets. At the end of oogenesis, an electron-dense fibrous vitelline envelope appears around the oocyte, among short microvilli. At the same time, electron-dense cortical granules occur in the oocyte cortical cytoplasm; at the end of oogenesis they are numerous, but after fertilization they disappear from the ooplasm. In the present article we point out many differences in the course of oogenesis in two related families of rhynchobdellids: piscicolids and glossiphoniids.     

Comparative developmental physiology and molecular cytology of the polytrophic ovarian follicles of the blowfly Sarcophaga bullata and the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster

1. The ovarian follicles of Sarcophaga and Drosophila consist of one oocyte and 15 nurse cells, the whole being surrounded by follicle cells. Although oocyte and nurse cells are genetically identical sibling cells, and although they are interconnected by cytoplasmic bridges, their physiology is very different. 2. The DNA content of the oocyte nucleus (germinal vesicle) never exceeds 4C, while values of polyploidisation up to 1024C have been measured in the nurse cells, this being dependent on their position within a follicle. 3. The nurse cell nuclei very actively synthesize RNA, while the germinal vesicle is almost completely inactive in this respect. 4. It has been possible to visualise the major cytoskeletal elements in the different ovarian cell types. Cellular markers of polarity and dorsoventral asymmetry have been described. 5. Electrophysiological measurements have been performed to find out whether or not the self-electrophoresis principle may be involved in polarised transport between nurse cells and oocyte. 6. Most of the vitellogenin is synthesized by the fat body but some follicle cells also synthesize small amounts. 7. The role of 20-OH ecdysone in the induction of vitellogenin synthesis in the fat body, as well as the presence of met-enkephalin like immunoreactivity in the gonads is well established in both species. Not so clear is the exact role of juvenile hormones and the nature of brain factors controlling ovarian development. 8. Drosophila has the advantage of its well documented genetics while the larger species Sarcophaga is preferable for the study of (electro-) physiological and cell biological mechanisms.     

The flea ovary: ultrastructure and analysis of cell clusters

Panoistic ovarioles are found in the order of fleas (Siphonaptera). Only in some species of the Hystrichopsylloidea do polytrophic meroistic ovaries occur. No stem cells and no dividing cystocytes are found in female imagines of Hystrichopsylla talpae. However, each germ cell cluster consists of 32 cells which are generated by five mitotic cycles during the pupal stage. One of the cells containing five intercellular bridges becomes the oocyte, the others serve as nurse cells. Thus, germ cell cluster formation follows the 2(n)-rule. However, no polyfusome is found and nurse cells do not form a rosette. Furthermore, nurse cells remain small and show the same ultrastructural characters as the oocytes, which became distinguishable from nurse cells only by their enhanced growth during pre-vitellogenesis. The first phase of pre-vitellogenesis is dominated by the production of an unknown cytoplasmatic component, consisting of spherical particles, clearly distinguishable from ribosomes by diameter and contrast. The next phase is characterized by a tremendous increase in the production of ribosomes. During this second phase another cytoplasmic component consisting of ball-like structures becomes prominent. During pre-vitellogenesis, germ cell nuclei undergo a pronounced structural change in which, finally, numerous extranucleolar particles predominate. Thus, H. talpae has a polytrophic meroistic ovary, but its oocyte genomes behave panoistically.     

The occurrence of intercellular bridges during oogenesis in the mouse

A fine structural analysis of fetal mouse ovaries reveals the presence of intercellular bridges between developing oocytes. These bridges, which connect two or more oocytes, are most frequently seen prior to the dictyate stage of meiotic prophase. The intercellular connections are limited by a tri-laminar membrane which is continuous with the oocyte plasmalemma. A characteristic feature of all bridges is the presence of an electron-dense material on the cytoplasmic side of the limiting membrane. Since this dense material is a constant and conspicuous component of the entire bridge, identification of these connections is possible in all planes of section. In cross section, the bridges are usually cylindrical, while in longitudinal section, a variety of configurations are observed. Oocytes connected by intercellular bridges exhibit a highly developed Golgi complex which is frequently localized in the region of the cytoplasmic continuities. Vesicular elements, apparently derived from the Golgi, are routinely observed within the boundaries of the bridges. Other cytoplasmic organelles, including rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum, free ribosomes and mitochondria, are also seen in these bridges. The presence of these vesicles and organelles within intercellular bridges suggests that these connections may provide a means for transfer of organelles and other substances from one oocyte to another. It may be, therefore, that intercellular bridges are important for the nourishment and maturation of certain selected oocytes as well as for the synchronization of meiotic events.     

Collective oscillations of coupled cell cycles

Problems with networks of coupled oscillators arise in multiple contexts, commonly leading to the question about the dependence of network dynamics on network structure. Previous work has addressed this question in Drosophila oogenesis, in which stable cytoplasmic bridges connect the future oocyte to the supporting nurse cells that supply the oocyte with molecules and organelles needed for its development. To increase their biosynthetic capacity, nurse cells enter the endoreplication program, a special form of the cell cycle formed by the iterated repetition of growth and synthesis phases without mitosis. Recent studies have revealed that the oocyte orchestrates nurse cell endoreplication cycles, based on retrograde (oocyte to nurse cells) transport of a cell cycle inhibitor produced by the nurse cells and localized to the oocyte. Furthermore, the joint dynamics of endocycles has been proposed to depend on the intercellular connectivity within the oocyte-nurse cell cluster. We use a computational model to argue that this connectivity guides, but does not uniquely determine the collective dynamics and identify several oscillatory regimes, depending on the timescale of intercellular transport. Our results provide insights into collective dynamics of coupled cell cycles and motivate future quantitative studies of intercellular communication in the germline cell clusters.     

The histology and histochemistry of oogenesis in the water strider, Gerris remigis Say

In each ovariole of Gerris remigis, nurse cells arise by mitotic divisions at the anterior end of the germarium. These cells enlarge as they move posteriorly. This size increase is possibly caused by fusion of cells, but probably by endopolyploidy as well. The nurse cells then establish connections with a central trophic core, which receives the products of subsequent nurse cell degradation. Two possible pathways of nuclear degradation are suggested: one involves the condensation of chromatin within the nucleus; the other, the release of DNA as fine granules into the cytoplasm. Cytoplasmic areas containing such DNA are also rich in proteinaceous granules, but have a meager content of RNA. The remainder of the cytoplasm of the mature nurse cells contains a high concentration of RNA, as do the nucleoli. Posteriorly the trophic core connects via nutritive cords with each developing oocyte in the prefollicular region and in the anterior vitellarium. RNA is apparently contributed to the ooplasm via the trophic stream. Patches of cytoplasmic DNA are present in the young oocytes; the origin and fate of this DNA is uncertain. During early oocyte maturation chromosomal stainability decreases, and the nucleolus enlarges. In previtellogenic stages, numerous proteinaceous bodies appear in association with the nucleolus-chromosome complex. These bodies, like the nucleolus, have only a low RNA content. They may pass to the cytoplasm, but cannot be traced with certainty. During the latter part of this period a complex population of small proteinaceous and lipid preyolk bodies accumulates peripherally in the oocyte. Definitive protein and lipid yolk are probably derived by the enlargement and inward migration of these bodies. The oocytes are each surrounded by a layer of follicle cells proliferated in the prefollicular region. These become binucleate and enlarge as the enclosed oocytes grow and elongate. RNA also increases in the nucleoli and cytoplasm of the follicle cells as they move posteriorly in the vitellarium. There is no evidence of transfer of nucleic acids or protein from the follicle cells to the oocyte. The nurse cells are therefore implicated as the major source of nucleic acids for the maturing oocyte.     

Observations on the polarity of mutant Drosophila follicles lacking the oocyte

Summary Homozygous females of the mutantsegalitarian andBicaudal-D ^R26produce follicles in which the oocyte is replaced by an additional nurse cell. Normal morphological markers for polarity can be identified in mutant follicles but the normal spatial organization of these markers is disturbed. For example, nurse-cell nuclei of different ploidy classes are present but, contrary to wild-type follicles, the nuclei show no anteroposterior ploidy gradient. The two cells with four intercellular bridges, one of which should have developed into the oocyte rather than a nurse cell, are located at the posterior pole only in young follicles (up to about stage 5), whereas during later stages they are more often found at lateral or intermediate positions. This disturbed polarity correlates with a variable aberrant pattern of extracellular ionic currents. Moreover, in the mutant follicles patches of columnar follicular epithelium differentiate locally although this type of epithelium forms normally only around the oocyte. The follicle cells at both follicle poles possess anterior quality since they migrate from both poles towards the centre of the follicle, as do the border cells restricted to the anterior pole in wild-type follicles. Our analysis indicates that in the mutants the follicular polarity is normal at first but becomes disturbed during stages 5 to 6. The secondary breakdown of polarity is likely to follow on from the absence of the oocyte.     

Mayflies (ephemeroptera), the most “primitive” winged insects,have telotrophic meroistic ovaries

Germ line cell cluster formation in ovarioles of three different stages, each from a different mayfly species, was studied using ultra-thin serial sectioning. In the analysed ovariole of Cloeön sp., only one linear, zigzag germ line cell cluster was found, consisting of sibling cells connected by intercellular bridges which represent remnants of preceding synchronized mitotic cycles followed by incomplete cytokinesis. A polyfusome stretched through all sibling cells. At the tip of the ovariole, cytokinesis occurred without preceding division of nuclei; thus, intercellular bridges were lined up but the remaining cytoplasm between the bridges had no nuclei. The analysed Siphlonurus armatus vitellarium contained five oocytes at different stages of development. Each oocyte in the vitellarium was connected via a nutritive cord to the linear cluster of its sibling cells in the terminal trophic chamber. Each cluster had the same architecture as was found in Cloëon. The 3-dimensional arrangement and distribution of closed intercellular bridges strongly suggest that all five clusters are derived from a single primary clone. The position of oocytes within each cluster is random. However, each oocyte is embraced by follicular or prefollicular cells whilst all other sibling cells are enclosed by somatic inner sheath cells, clearly distinguishable from prefollicular cells. In the analysed ovariole of Ephemerella ignita, two small linear clusters were found in the tropharium beside two single cells, two isolated cytoplasmic bags with intercellular bridges but no nuclei, and some degenerating aggregates. One cluster was still connected to a growing oocyte via a nutritive cord. In all species the nurse cells remained small and no indications of polyploidization were found. We suggest that this ancient and previously unknown telotrophic meroistic ovary has evolved directly from panoistic ancestors.