弹性髓内钉与接骨板内固定治疗儿童股骨干骨折的临床疗效对比研究

摘要 目的：对比弹性髓内钉与接骨板内固定治疗儿童股骨干骨折的临床疗效。方法：本研究为回顾性研究,选取我院于2018年3月~2019年8月期间收治的儿童股骨干骨折患者98例,根据固定方式的不同将患儿分为A组（n=50,接骨板内固定治疗）和B组（n=48,弹性髓内钉治疗）,观察两组优良率、术前/术后相关指标及并发症发生情况。结果：B组的优良率高于A组（P<0.05）。B组手术时间、切口长度短于A组,术中出血量少于A组（P<0.05）。B组骨折愈合时间、住院时间、手术至内固定拆除时间、取出内固定手术时间短于A组（P<0.05）。两组患儿并发症发生率对比,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：相对于接骨板内固定治疗,弹性髓内钉治疗儿童股骨干骨折,疗效更好,可有效改善术中、术后指标,且不增加并发症的发生率。     

FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURES—A Study of Closed Reduction and Open Treatment

A comparative study was made of 58 cases of closed femoral shaft fractures treated by skeletal traction, and 24 cases of closed femoral shaft fractures treated by open reduction with internal fixation.Although complications occurred in some cases, intramedullary nailing appeared to be the most satisfactory method, resulting in primary union, in decreased time of recumbency and time in hospital, in earlier ambulation and in less residual disability.Success of intramedullary nailing depends largely upon adequate training or experience of the surgeon in the technical operative aspects of the procedure and in postoperative management.Placing supplemental autogenous iliac bone chips at the fracture site in closed femoral fractures in which intramedullary nailing is performed appears to enhance callus formation and bony consolidation.Skeletal traction should be utilized on all patients whose general physical condition does not permit operative intervention.     

弹性髓内钉和钢板固定对儿童股骨干中段骨折的疗效比较

目的:观察并比较弹性髓内钉(ESIN)与钢板固定(PF)治疗儿童股骨干中段骨折的临床疗效。方法:选择2013年2月至2016年12月我院收治的股骨干中段骨折患儿90例,依据治疗方法不同分为ESIN组和PF组。ESIN组(n=45)采用弹性髓内钉固定,PF组(n=45)采用钢板固定,比较两组患者手术时间、手术切口、术中失血量、术后切口引流量等手术指标,随访评估患者住院时间、完全负重时间、骨折愈合时间;按Flynn评定标准比较两组患者的最终治疗结果。结果:两组患者术中失血量、术后引流量比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),ESIN组患者手术切口显著小于PF组(P0.05),手术时间、透视时间、完全负重时间均显著短于PF组(P0.05),临床疗效明显优于PF组(P0.05)。结论:与钢板固定比较,弹性髓内钉在手术时间、透视时间显著短于钢板固定,临床疗效明显优于钢板固定,可作为儿童股骨干骨折内固定的首选材料。     

胫骨髓内钉入路治疗胫骨干骨折的临床进展

胫骨干骨折是最常见的长骨骨折,对于不稳定的胫骨骨折,胫骨髓内钉因其独特的优势逐渐成为首选治疗方式。当前对于胫骨干髓内钉入路主要分为髌骨上入路和髌骨下入路。髌骨上入路放置髓内钉时,患肢半伸直位有利于胫骨干骨折的复位与固定,但可能会造成髌骨关节面损伤。髌骨下入路患肢屈曲位可能会造成胫骨干复位的丢失,进而影响患者的预后。因此,胫骨髓内钉置入不同入路可能造成不同临床结局,会对临床结局造成不同的影响。目前对于胫骨髓内钉最佳入路仍然存在争议,针对最近发表的相关文献我们对胫骨髓内钉入路及其优缺点进行讨论综述。     

近端膨胀髓内钉与抗旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效分析

目的:探究近端膨胀髓内钉与近端螺旋刀片抗旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折疗效及躁动发生率比较。方法:病例来源为2012年5月至2013年10月收入我院的老年股骨转子间骨折患者60例,采用随机数字表随机分为两组,膨胀钉组30例,采用近端膨胀髓内钉的手术方法,PFNA组30例,采用近端螺旋刀片抗旋髓内钉的手术方法。手术结束后,对两组患者进行X射线片、手术时间及出血量、髋关节功能的比较,同时对比躁动发生率。结果:X线检查结果显示两组患者经手术后骨折处均复位良好,无并发症及内固定物的脱落及松动,两组比较无显著差异(P0.05);与PFNA组相比,膨胀组患者的手术时间及出血量明显降低,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者术后3个月、6个月的Harris评分显示,与PFNA组相比,膨胀钉组的优良率明显升高,髋关节优于PFNA组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);膨胀钉组患者躁动率为10.00%低于PFNA组患者躁动率为33.33%,具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:可膨胀髓内钉具有手术时间较短、出血量少,更利于骨折的愈合,且躁动发生率较低,对股骨转子间骨折的疗效优于较近端螺旋刀片抗旋髓内钉,对临床有指导意义,值得临床推广。     

Bony Healing of Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures in the Elderly Using Percutaneously Applied Titanium Mesh Cages and a Transpedicular Fixation System with Expandable Screws

IntroductionThere is a high incidence of vertebral burst fractures following low velocity trauma in the elderly. Treatment of unstable vertebral burst fractures using the same principles like in stable vertebral burst fractures may show less favourable results in terms of fracture reduction, maintenance of reduction and cement leakage. In order to address these shortcomings this study introduces cementless fixation of unstable vertebral burst fractures using internal fixators and expandable intravertebral titanium mesh cages in a one-stage procedure via minimum-invasive techniques.ResultsStabilization of the collapsed vertebral body was achieved in all 16 cases without any intraoperative complication. Surgical time averaged 102±6.6 minutes (71–194). The postoperative kyphotic angle (KA) and Cobb angle revealed significant improvements (KA 13.7° to 7.4°, p<0.001; Cobb 9.6° to 6.0°, p<0.002) with partial loss of reduction at final follow-up (KA 8.3°, Cobb 8.7°). VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) improved from 7.6 to 2.6 (p<0.001). Adjacent fractures were not observed. One minor (malposition of pedicle screw) complication was encountered.ConclusionCementless fixation of osteoporotic burst fractures revealed substantial pain relief, adequate maintenance of reduction and a low complication rate. Bony healing after unstable osteoporotic burst fractures is possible.

Trial Registration

www.germanctr.de DRKS00005657     

MIPO技术结合锁定加压钢板、顺行交锁髓内钉及锁定加压钢板治疗肱骨干中段骨折疗效的对比研究

摘要 目的：探讨微创经皮钢板内固定（MIPO）技术结合锁定加压钢板、顺行交锁髓内钉、锁定加压钢板治疗肱骨干中段骨折的疗效。方法：选择2016年2月至2019年2月我院收治的126例肱骨干中段骨折患者，采用随机数字表法将其分为三组，MIPO组（42例）采用MIPO技术结合锁定加压钢板固定治疗，髓内钉组（42例）采用顺行交锁髓内钉固定治疗，钢板组（42例）采用锁定加压钢板固定治疗。所有患者术后随访12个月，比较三组手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、骨折愈合时间、术前和术后第12个月美国加州大学肩关节评分系统（UCLA）评分、Mayo肘关节功能评分（MEPS）、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)评分以及并发症发生率。结果：MIPO组和髓内钉组的术中出血量与术后住院时间均少于钢板组（P＜0.05），MIPO组和髓内钉组之间无统计学差异（P＞0.05）。MIPO组、钢板组骨折愈合时间短于髓内钉组（P＜0.05），MIPO组、钢板组之间无统计学差异（P＞0.05）。MIPO组、钢板组术后第12个月UCLA评分均高于髓内钉组（P＜0.05），MIPO组、钢板组之间无统计学差异，第12个月MEPS无差异（P＞0.05）。术后第12个月MIPO组、钢板组EQ-5D评分高于髓内钉组（P＜0.05），MIPO组、钢板组之间无统计学差异（P＞0.05）。三组桡神经损伤、肩峰损伤发生率相比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），桡神经损伤以钢板组发生率最高，肩峰损伤以髓内钉组发生率最高。结论：MIPO技术结合锁定加压钢板具有微创、术后恢复快、对肩关节功能及生活质量的影响较小、术后并发症较少的优势，是肱骨干中段骨折较为理想的治疗方式。     

动力髋螺钉与股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨近端骨折的临床疗效比较

目的:比较动力髋螺钉与股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨近端骨折的临床疗效和安全性。方法:收集我院收治的老年股骨近端骨折患者64例,随机分为DHS组和PFN组,每组各32例。DHS组患者给予动力髋螺钉的固定方式,PFN组给予股骨近端髓内钉的固定方式。手术后对患者的手术切口长度、术中出血量、手术时间、骨折愈合时间、术后并发症以及患者临床疗效进行检测并比较。结果:与治疗前相比,两组患者治疗后的Harris评分均显著下降(P0.05);与DHS组相比,PFN组患者的手术切口长度、术中出血量、手术时间、骨折愈合时间、术后并发症的发生率以及Harris评分均较低(P0.05)。结论:股骨近端髓内钉的固定治疗老年股骨近端骨折的临床疗效较好,安全性更高。     

SL-R柄人工股骨头置换术与股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年不稳定型骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较研究

目的:探讨股骨近端防旋髓内钉、SL-R柄人工股骨头置换术两种术式治疗老年不稳定型骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折的应用效果。方法:选取2015年1月-2017年6月间于河北医科大学附属秦皇岛市第一医院行手术治疗的老年不稳定型骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折患者98例,以数表法将患者随机均分为对照组(n=49)和观察组(n=49)。其中对照组采用股骨近端防旋髓内钉,观察组采用SL-R柄人工股骨头置换术。比较两组患者临床各项指标、手术前后髋关节功能评分以及术后并发症发生情况。结果:观察组手术时间、术中失血量均高于对照组,但住院时间、开始负重时间则低于对照组(P0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率为4.08%(2/49),低于对照组的18.37%(9/49)(P0.05)。术后1个月、3个月时患者髋关节各项评分相比术前均有升高,术后3个月的各项评分高于术后1个月(P0.05);观察组术后1个月、3个月各项评分均高于对照组(P0.05)。结论:在老年不稳定型骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折患者治疗过程当中,采用SL-R柄人工股骨头置换术可减少住院时间,疗效确切,无严重并发症,且可改善髋关节各项功能评分。     

半髋关节置换治疗高龄老年人不稳定转子间骨折的效果研究

目的:探讨半髋关节置换术治疗老年不稳定性转子间骨折的治疗效果。方法:选择我院骨科2013年1月至2015年2月入院的老年不稳定转子间骨折患者64例,随机分为半髋关节置换组和髓内钉固定组,对两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症、术后髋关节功能恢复状况进行评价。结果:半髋关节置换组手术时间较髓内钉固定组短(P0.05),半髋关节置换组和髓内钉固定组术中出血量、手术后并发症、髋关节功能恢复状况的差异不具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:半髋关节置换术治疗老年不稳定性转子间骨折具有较好的临床效果。     

人工髋关节置换和内固定治疗复杂股骨转子间骨折的疗效及对预后的影响

目的:对比人工髋关节置换和内固定治疗复杂股骨转子间骨折的疗效及对预后的影响。方法:选择2008年1月~2012年5月我院骨科收治的复杂股骨转子间骨折患者85例,按知情同意原则分成人工髋关节置换组(A组,46例)及内固定组(B组,39例)2组,记录患者的一般临床资料及治疗情况,比较两组患者疗效指标及预后指标。结果:A组患者卧床时间低于B组患者,差别有统计学意义(P0.05);术后1、3、6个月的Harris评分情况A组均优于B组患者,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:人工髋关节置换治疗复杂股骨转子间骨折能有效缩短患者卧床时间,迅速恢复关节功能,远期疗效效果好。     

交锁髓内钉与锁定加压钢板内固定对股骨干骨折患者膝关节功能及创伤相关指标的影响

目的:探讨交锁髓内钉(IIN)与锁定加压钢板(LCP)两种内固定方法对股骨干骨折(FSF)患者膝关节功能及创伤相关指标的影响。方法:回顾性分析2015年1月-2018年3月我院收治的97例FSF患者的临床资料,依照内固定方式的不同分为IIN组(n=54)和LCP组(n=43),比较两组患者的术后骨折愈合情况,围术期指标、创伤相关指标、膝关节功能恢复及并发症情况。结果:术后IIN组骨折愈合优良率为92.59%,高于LCP组的76.74%(P0.05),IIN组患者手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、骨折愈合时间少于LCP组(P0.05);IIN组浅表感染率、内固定物断裂率、骨折延迟愈合率、不愈合率及血清C反应蛋白(CRP)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)、肾上腺素(E)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)水平低于LCP组(P0.05);IIN组患者Fugl-Meyer下肢运动评分、美国膝关节协会(KSS)评分高于LCP组(P0.05)。结论:相较于LCP内固定,IIN内固定对FSF患者的创伤较轻,术后并发症较少,可更好地促进骨折愈合及膝关节功能恢复。     

顺行髓内钉、逆行髓内钉及锁定加压钢板内固定治疗股骨远端骨折的对比研究

摘要目的：探讨顺行髓内钉、逆行髓内钉及锁定加压钢板内固定3种方法治疗股骨远端骨折患者的疗效。方法：对2011年1月至2012年12月间我院收治的101例股骨远端骨折进行临床随机分组手术,分别在手术中使用顺行髓内钉、逆行髓内钉以及锁定加压钢板内固定。对三组患者手术时间、术中出血量以及切口长度等一般情况进行比较分析,同时采用Harris评分系统对三组患者术后恢复情况进行分析比较。结果：经过手术治疗后,逆行髓内钉组Harris评分显著高于其他两组（P〈0．05）。另外,逆行髓内钉组手术过程短、出血量少、手术切口小,上述指标与其他两组比较均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论：股骨远端骨折行逆行髓内钉治疗的疗效优于顺行髓内钉以及锁定加压钢板内固定,具有手术时间短、术中出血少、切口小等优点,能够有效提高术后膝关节功能的恢复,值得临床推广使用。     

急诊闭合复位和切开复位空心钉治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效对比分析

目的:研究分析急诊闭合复位和切开复位空心钉治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效。方法:选取2013年6月至2014年6月期间于我院接受治疗的92例急诊股骨颈骨折患者,将所有患者(按随机数字表法)均分为观察组(n=46)和对照组(n=46)。观察组患者采取切开复位空心钉治疗法进行治疗,对照组则采取闭合复位空心钉治疗法进行诊疗。比较两组患者术中术后情况、随访中髋关节功能Harris评分以及相关术后并发症情况。结果:观察组患者所需的手术时间、术中出血量、伤口长度明显多于对照组[(61.43±5.34)min、(30.54±4.27)m L、(6.43±0.56)cm比(46.54±3.26)min、(16.43±2.43)m L、(1.83±0.44)cm](P0.05)。观察组的髋关节功能Harris评分优良率显著高于对照组[82.61%(38/46)比50.00%(23/46)](P0.05)。两组患者的骨折不愈合率比较无显著性差异(P0.05),观察组的股骨头坏死率显著低于对照组[2.17%(1/46)比13.04%(6/46)](P0.05)。结论:应用切开复位空心钉治疗股骨颈骨折患者的方法更佳,其临床治疗效果更好且患者股骨头发生缺血坏死的几率也更低。     

Hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation for intracapsular displaced femoral neck fractures: randomised controlled trial

Objective To compare the functional results after displaced fractures of the femoral neck treated with internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty.Design Randomised trial with blinding of assessments of functional results.Setting University hospital.Participants 222 patients; 165 (74%) women, mean age 83 years. Inclusion criteria were age above 60, ability to walk before the fracture, and no major hip pathology, regardless of cognitive function.Interventions Closed reduction and two parallel screws (112 patients) and bipolar cemented hemiarthroplasty (110 patients). Follow-up at 4, 12, and 24 months.Main outcome measures Hip function (Harris hip score), health related quality of life (Eq-5d), activities of daily living (Barthel index). In all cases high scores indicate better function.Results Mean Harris hip score in the hemiarthroplasty group was 8.2 points higher (95% confidence interval 2.8 to 13.5 points, P=0.003) at four months and 6.7 points (1.5 to 11.9 points, P=0.01) higher at 12 months. Mean Eq-5d index score at 24 months was 0.13 higher in the hemiarthroplasty group (0.01 to 0.25, P=0.03). The Eq-5d visual analogue scale was 8.7 points higher in the hemiarthroplasty group after 4 months (1.9 to 15.6, P=0.01). After 12 and 24 months the percentage scoring 95 or 100 on the Barthel index was higher in the hemiarthroplasty group (relative risk 0.67, 0.47 to 0.95, P=0.02. and 0.63, 0.42 to 0.94, P=0.02, respectively). Complications occurred in 56 (50%) patients in the internal fixation group and 16 (15%) in the hemiarthroplasty group (3.44, 2.11 to 5.60, P<0.001). In each group 39 patients (35%) died within 24 months (0.98, 0.69 to 1.40, P=0.92)Conclusions Hemiarthroplasty is associated with better functional outcome than internal fixation in treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients.Trial registration {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00464230","term_id":"NCT00464230"}}NCT00464230.     

两种不同内固定手术对髌骨骨折患者术后膝关节功能恢复的影响

目的:探讨两种不同的手术方式(钛制空心钉结合张力带内固定手术)对髌骨骨折患者的临床疗效和安全性比较。方法:选择2016年6月-2017年10月治疗的髌骨骨折患者72例作为对象,使用随机数字表,随机分为对照组(n=36)和观察组(n=36)。对照组给予常规的克氏针张力带内固定进行手术,观察组则使用空心钉张力带进行固定。治疗后对患者效果进行统计和评估,比较两组患者的术后骨折的愈合时间,功能恢复(最大屈曲角度),髌骨评分以及并发症等指标。结果:根据不同的治疗方式后,观察组(空心钉张力带固定组)在骨折的愈合时间,功能恢复,髌骨评分以及并发症等比较指标中较对照组均有显著优势,其结果具备统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:将钛制空心钉结合张力带内固定手术用于髌骨骨折与传统的克氏针张力带固定方法相比较,具有操作简便,骨折愈合率高,功能恢复确实,并发症发生率低等诸多优点,值得在临床中进一步推广应用。     

交锁髓内钉与经皮锁定钢板治疗胫骨骨折的临床对照研究

目的:探讨交锁髓内钉与经皮锁定钢板治疗胫骨骨折的疗效。方法:选取了100例胫骨骨折患者,按住院单双号分为两组,对照组(48例)给予交锁髓内钉,观察组(52例)给予经皮锁定钢板治疗。通过观察并记录疗效,围手术期指标及随访3个月的并发症发生情况,评价交锁髓内钉与经皮锁定钢板治疗胫骨骨折的疗效。结果:采用经皮锁定钢板内固定和交锁髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折,两种手术方法所需手术时间无统计学差异(P0.05),经皮锁定钢板内固定术术中出血量更少,术后观察组患者住院时间和骨折愈合时间更短(P0.05),术后3个月,观察组患者有效率明显高于对照组(P0.05),随访3个月期间,观察组并发症5例,发生率9.6%,对照组并发症12例,发生率25.0%,观察组并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P0.05)。结论:经皮锁定钢板对胫骨骨折具有较好的疗效,手术安全性高,并发症少,能促进骨折愈合,使患者尽早康复,值得临床推广使用。     

Atypical Femoral Fracture in an Osteogenesis Imperfecta Patient Successfully Treated with Teriparatide

ObjectiveWe report a case of a successfully healed atypical femoral fracture (AFF) following treatment with teriparatide in a patient with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). To our knowledge, no successful treatment of AFFs with teriparatide in this subpopulation has ever been described.MethodsThis is a case report of an AFF treated with teriparatide.ResultsThe patient was treated with hormone replacement therapy for 18 years and bisphosphonates for 9 years before suffering a spontaneous AFF in the form of a dislocated noncomminute transverse fracture of the right femoral shaft, and an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a T2 Femoral Nail was done. Due to nonunion and another fracture distal to the nail, the patient was reoperated on with exchange ORIF and off-label treatment with teriparatide 20 μg/day was started. An X-ray 1 month later showed early signs of fracture healing. A subsequent X-ray 6 months after the last operation showed a solid healing of both right femoral fractures.ConclusionThis is a rare case that highly suggests a potential fracture healing effect of teriparatide treatment and highlights a potential significant practical therapeutic consideration in relation to the management of AFF with delayed healing. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:e187-e190)     

腓骨柱植骨支撑固定防治股骨颈骨折术后股骨头坏死的机理和临床疗效

目的:探讨腓骨柱植骨支撑固定防治股骨颈骨折术后股骨头坏死机理研究和临床疗效。方法:随访符合标准的56例患者,记录骨折的Garden分型、内固定的全程稳定性、股骨头坏死的发生和演变等指标,并采用SPSS18.0进行统计分析。结果:56例患者均恢复解剖复位,在术后3-6月骨折愈合,平均4个月,愈合率为100%;Harris功能评分51-100分,平均分为84.6分,其中优者(≥90.0分)37髋,良者(80.0~89.9分)14髋,中者(70.0~79.9分)者1髋,差者(70.0分)4髋,Harris功能评分优良率为91.10%,没有发生内固定失效和骨折不愈合;22例根据MRI表现出股骨头坏死症状,坏死率39.30%,其中17例影像学坏死能够在随访期内维持为ARCOⅠ-Ⅱ期或者完全修复。其余的5例进展为临床坏死;晚期出现塌陷4例(7.15%)。Garden Ⅰ、Ⅱ级和GardenⅢ、Ⅳ级相比较,两组股骨头坏死率有统计学差异(P0.05),且两组的晚期塌陷率比较也有统计学差异(P0.05)。结论:空心加压螺钉与腓骨柱的所具有的生物力学稳定效能,能提供全程可靠的抗挤压、抗拉伸及抗旋转三维度稳定性,可以提供强大的机械稳定性;同时腓骨柱具有较强的生物学修复能力,为股骨头骨头血运重建和坏死区修复持续稳定的血供及持续有效的生物学修复能力。生物学愈合后腓骨柱在软骨下形成一个较大接触面积的支撑效果,可以预防股骨头坏死后塌陷。     

Comparison of the clinical effect of DHS and PFNA on senile osteoporotic fracture and their significance of changes in BALP expression level

Objective:To investigate the clinical effects of dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) on senile osteoporosis patients and their effects on the expression level of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP).Methods:116 elderly patients with osteoporotic fracture were divided into DHS group (n=67) and PFNA group (n=49). BALP values were measured by ELISA before operation and 30 days after operation.Results:The operation time, the bleeding volume, and the weight-bearing time of PFNA group was shorter than DHS group (p<0.05); the dominant blood loss and occult blood loss in PFNA group were less than those in DHS group (p<0.05); the healing time and detumescence time, the complications of PFNA group was fewer than the DHS group (p<0.05). The ten-meter walking speed and the five sitting tests in PFNA group were shorter than that in DHS group (p<0.05); the excellent and good rate and Harris score in PFNA group were higher than those in DHS group (p<0.05). The expression of BALP in PFNA group was lower than that in DHS group (p<0.05).Conclusion:PFNA surgery has less trauma, fewer complications, more optimistic postoperative healing and recovery degree, and is more conducive to the reduction of BALP expression level.