An Analysis of the Metabolic Theory of the Origin of the Genetic Code

A computer program was used to test Wong's coevolution theory of the genetic code. The codon correlations between the codons of biosynthetically related amino acids in the universal genetic code and in randomly generated genetic codes were compared. It was determined that many codon correlations are also present within random genetic codes and that among the random codes there are always several which have many more correlations than that found in the universal code. Although the number of correlations depends on the choice of biosynthetically related amino acids, the probability of choosing a random genetic code with the same or greater number of codon correlations as the universal genetic code was found to vary from 0.1% to 34% (with respect to a fairly complete listing of related amino acids). Thus, Wong's theory that the genetic code arose by coevolution with the biosynthetic pathways of amino acids, based on codon correlations between biosynthetically related amino acids, is statistical in nature. Received: 8 August 1996 / Accepted: 26 December 1996     

Parallel evolution of the genetic code in arthropod mitochondrial genomes

The genetic code provides the translation table necessary to transform the information contained in DNA into the language of proteins. In this table, a correspondence between each codon and each amino acid is established: tRNA is the main adaptor that links the two. Although the genetic code is nearly universal, several variants of this code have been described in a wide range of nuclear and organellar systems, especially in metazoan mitochondria. These variants are generally found by searching for conserved positions that consistently code for a specific alternative amino acid in a new species. We have devised an accurate computational method to automate these comparisons, and have tested it with 626 metazoan mitochondrial genomes. Our results indicate that several arthropods have a new genetic code and translate the codon AGG as lysine instead of serine (as in the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code) or arginine (as in the standard genetic code). We have investigated the evolution of the genetic code in the arthropods and found several events of parallel evolution in which the AGG codon was reassigned between serine and lysine. Our analyses also revealed correlated evolution between the arthropod genetic codes and the tRNA-Lys/-Ser, which show specific point mutations at the anticodons. These rather simple mutations, together with a low usage of the AGG codon, might explain the recurrence of the AGG reassignments.     

On the Structural Regularity in Nucleobases and Amino Acids and Relationship to the Origin and Evolution of the Genetic Code

To explore how chemical structures of both nucleobases and amino acids may have played a role in shaping the genetic code, numbers of sp² hybrid nitrogen atoms in nucleobases were taken as a determinative measure for empirical stereo-electronic property to analyze the genetic code. Results revealed that amino acid hydropathy correlates strongly with the sp² nitrogen atom numbers in nucleobases rather than with the overall electronic property such as redox potentials of the bases, reflecting that stereo-electronic property of bases may play a role. In the rearranged code, five simple but stereo-structurally distinctive amino acids (Gly, Pro, Val, Thr and Ala) and their codon quartets form a crossed intersection “core”. Secondly, a re-categorization of the amino acids according to their β-carbon stereochemistry, verified by charge density (at β-carbon) calculation, results in five groups of stereo-structurally distinctive amino acids, the group leaders of which are Gly, Pro, Val, Thr and Ala, remarkably overlapping the above “core”. These two lines of independent observations provide empirical arguments for a contention that a seemingly “frozen” “core” could have formed at a certain evolutionary stage. The possible existence of this codon “core” is in conformity with a previous evolutionary model whereby stereochemical interactions may have shaped the code. Moreover, the genetic code listed in UCGA succession together with this codon “core” has recently facilitated an identification of the unprecedented icosikaioctagon symmetry and bi-pyramidal nature of the genetic code.     

In vitro selection for sense codon suppression

The universal genetic code links the 20 naturally occurring amino acids to the 61 sense codons. Previously, the UAG amber stop codon (a nonsense codon) has been used as a blank in the code to insert natural and unnatural amino acids via nonsense suppression. We have developed a selection methodology to investigate whether the unnatural amino acid biocytin could be incorporated into an mRNA display library at sense codons. In these experiments we probed a single randomized NNN codon with a library of 16 orthogonal, biocytin-acylated tRNAs. In vitro selection for efficient incorporation of the unnatural amino acid resulted in templates containing the GUA codon at the randomized position. This sense suppression occurs via Watson-Crick pairing with similar efficiency to UAG-mediated nonsense suppression. These experiments suggest that sense codon suppression is a viable means to expand the chemical and functional diversity of the genetic code.     

On the organizational dynamics of the genetic code

The organization of the canonical genetic code needs to be thoroughly illuminated. Here we reorder the four nucleotides-adenine, thymine, guanine and cytosine-according to their emergence in evolution, and apply the organizational rules to devising an algebraic representation for the canonical genetic code. Under a framework of the devised code, we quantify codon and amino acid usages from a large collection of 917 prokaryotic genome sequences, and associate the usages with its intrinsic structure and classification schemes as well as amino acid physicochemical properties. Our results show that the algebraic representation of the code is structurally equivalent to a content-centric organization of the code and that codon and amino acid usages under different classification schemes were correlated closely with GC content, implying a set of rules governing composition dynamics across a wide variety of prokaryotic genome sequences. These results also indicate that codons and amino acids are not randomly allocated in the code, where the six-fold degenerate codons and their amino acids have important balancing roles for error minimization. Therefore, the content-centric code is of great usefulness in deciphering its hitherto unknown regularities as well as the dynamics of nucleotide, codon, and amino acid compositions.     

Genetic Code Evolution Started with the Incorporation of Glycine,Followed by Other Small Hydrophilic Amino Acids

We propose that glycine was the first amino acid to be incorporated into the genetic code, followed by serine, aspartic and/or glutamic acid—small hydrophilic amino acids that all have codons in the bottom right-hand corner of the standard genetic code table. Because primordial ribosomal synthesis is presumed to have been rudimentary, this stage would have been characterized by the synthesis of short, water-soluble peptides, the first of which would have comprised polyglycine. Evolution of the code is proposed to have occurred by the duplication and mutation of tRNA sequences, which produced a radiation of codon assignment outwards from the bottom right-hand corner. As a result of this expansion, we propose a trend from small hydrophilic to hydrophobic amino acids, with selection for longer polypeptides requiring a hydrophobic core for folding and stability driving the incorporation of hydrophobic amino acids into the code.     

A content-centric organization of the genetic code

The codon table for the canonical genetic code can be rearranged in such a way that the code is divided into four quarters and two halves according to the variability of their GC and purine contents, respectively. For prokaryotic genomes, when the genomic GC content increases, their amino acid contents tend to be restricted to the GC-rich quarter and the purine-content insensitive half, where all codons are fourfold degenerate and relatively mutation-tolerant. Conversely, when the genomic GC content decreases, most of the codons retract to the AUrich quarter and the purine-content sensitive half; most of the codons not only remain encoding physicochemically diversified amino acids but also vary when transversion （between purine and pyrimidine） happens. Amino acids with sixfolddegenerate codons are distributed into all four quarters and across the two halves; their fourfold-degenerate codons are all partitioned into the purine-insensitive half in favorite of robustness against mutations. The features manifested in the rearranged codon table explain most of the intrinsic relationship between protein coding sequences （the informational content） and amino acid compositions （the functional content）. The renovated codon table is useful in predicting abundant amino acids and positioning the amino acids with related or distinct physicochemical properties.     

On the optimality of the genetic code, with the consideration of coevolution theory by comparison of prominent cost measure matrices

Statistical and biochemical studies have revealed non-random patterns in codon assignments. The canonical genetic code is known to be highly efficient in minimizing the effects of mistranslation errors and point mutations, since it is known that when an amino acid is converted to another due to error, the biochemical properties of the resulted amino acid are usually very similar to those of the original one. In this study, using altered forms of the fitness functions used in the prior studies, we have optimized the parameters involved in the calculation of the error minimizing property of the genetic code so that the genetic code outscores the random codes as much as possible. This work also compares two prominent matrices, the Mutation Matrix and Point Accepted Mutations 74-100 (PAM(74-100)). It has been resulted that the hypothetical properties of the coevolution theory of the genetic code are already considered in PAM(74-100), giving more evidence on the existence of bias towards the genetic code in this matrix. Furthermore, our results indicate that PAM(74-100) is biased towards the single base mistranslation occurrences in second codon position as well as the frequency of amino acids. Thus PAM(74-100) is not a suitable substitution matrix for the studies conducted on the evolution of the genetic code.     

Construction of genetic code from evolutionary stability

The construction of the genetic code is investigated based on a stability principle. The concept and formulation of mutational deterioration (MD) of the genetic code is proposed. It is proved that the degeneracies of codon multiplets obey the rule to best resist MD. The MD for each ideal multiplet of codons is expressed by four parameters and it takes on a minimum value for real distributions of codons in the multiplet. Then the global mutational deterioration (GMD) of code table is calculated and the minimal code is deduced. The domain-like distribution of hydrophobic and hydrophilic amino acids on the genetic code is explained from the minimization of GMD. It is demonstrated that the standard code is approximately GMD-minimal. By introducing some constraints that are related to the initial condition of the system, we have deduced the standard genetic code from the minimization of GMD. The minimization shows the general trend of evolutionary process to some stable state while the constraints reflect a 'frozen accident.' Many deviant codon assignments are also explained through MD minimization assuming the changeable degrees of degeneracies for some multiplets. So, a possible answer to the question of "Why are synonymous codons and amino acids distributed in the code table just as they are?" is given.     

A hardware interpretation of the evolution of the genetic code

A quantitative rationale for the evolution of the genetic code is developed considering the principle of minimal hardware. This principle defines an optimal code as one that minimizes for a given amount of information encoded, the product of the number of physical devices used by the average complexity of each device. By identifying the number of different amino acids, number of nucleotide positions per codon and number of base types that can occupy each such position with, respectively, the amount of information, number of devices and the complexity, we show that optimal codes occur for 3, 7 and 20 amino acids with codons having a single, two and three base positions per codon, respectively. The advantage of a code of exactly 4 symbols is deduced, as well as a plausible evolutionary pathway from a code of doublets to triplets. The present day code of 20 amino acids encoded by 64 codons is shown to be the most optimal in an absolute sense. Using a tetraplet code further evolution to a code in which there would be 55 amino acids is in principle possible, but such a code would deviate slightly more than the present day code from the minimal hardware configuration. The change from a triplet code to a tetraplet code would occur at about 32 amino acids. Our conclusions are independent of, but consistent with, the observed physico-chemical properties of the amino acids and codon structures. These correlations could have evolved within the constrains imposed by the minimal hardware principle.     

Physico-chemical basis of the genetic code origin: stereochemical analysis of interactions of amino acids and nucleotides based on the progene hypothesis

A progene hypothesis has been proposed earlier to explain the mechanism of origin of the self-reproducing genetic system. Progenes (precursors of the genetic system) are mixed anhydrides of an amino acid and deoxyribotrinucleotide at the 3'-gamma-terminal phosphate (NpNpNppp-AA); they are produced from dinucleotides (NpNp) and 3'-gamma-aminoacylnucleotidylates (Nppp-AA) as a result of specific interaction between amino acid and dinucleotide. The postulated mechanism of progene formation accounts for the selection of substances, including chirality, the origin of the genetic code as well as for the mechanisms of formation, self-reproduction and evolution of the simpliest genetic system ("gene--polypeptide"). A stereochemical analysis of the progene formation mechanism has allowed us to support the main statements of the hypothesis that relate to the origin of the genetic code and to selection of substances. Atomic groups that could be responsible for the specificity of interaction between dinucleotides and amino acids in progene formation have been revealed. Stereochemical evidence for the physicochemical basis of the origin of the existing genetic code have been produced: 1) a special role of the second nucleotide in the codon is demonstrated in amino acid coding by the progene hypothesis principle; 2) an advantage of T against U in such coding is demonstrated; 3) for 16 amino acids out of 20 an agreement has been obtained between the optimal dinucleotide as revealed by the stereochemical analysis and the codon dinucleotides; 4) an explanation for the third nucleotide selection mechanism is offered. A restoration of the prebiotic code, based on these results, has indicated that the code contains 32 codons, is statistical and group-wise. It encodes 7 groups of isofunctional amino acids: 3 overlapping groups of non-polar amino acids 1) medium-size hydrophobic amino acids (chiefly Val, n-Val and a-But), 2) small and medium-size non-polar amino acids (chiefly Ala Val, n-Val a-But and Gly), 3) small non-polar amino acids (Gly, Ala, a-But) and 4 groups of polar amino acids--1) hydroxy--+dicarbonic (Asp, Glu, Ser and Thr), 2) dicarbonic (Asp and Glu), 3) hydroxy (Ser and Thr) and 4) basic (Arg and Lys). The code includes about 20 amino acids among which are 15-17 canonical and a few common non-canonical. The prebiotic code explains many properties of the existing genetic code and is capable of evolving into the latter by way of a gradual replacement of the physicochemical coding mechanism by the enzymatic coding mechanism.     

Amino Acid Exchangeability and the Adaptive Code Hypothesis

Since the genetic code first was determined, many have claimed that it is organized adaptively, so as to assign similar codons to similar amino acids. This claim has proved difficult to establish due to the absence of relevant comparative data on alternative primordial codes and of objective measures of amino acid exchangeability. Here we use a recently developed measure of exchangeability to evaluate a null hypothesis and two alternative hypotheses about the adaptiveness of the genetic code. The null hypothesis that there is no tendency for exchangeable amino acids to be assigned to similar codons can be excluded here as expected from earlier work. The first alternative hypothesis is that any such correlation between codon distance and amino acid distance is due to incremental mechanisms of code evolution, and not to adaptation to reduce deleterious effects of future mutations. More specifically, new codon assignments that occur by ambiguity reduction or by codon capture will tend to give rise to correlations, whether due to the condition of amino acid ambiguity, or to the condition of similarity between a new tRNA synthetase (or tRNA) and its parent. The second alternative hypothesis, the adaptive hypothesis, then may be defined as an excess relative to what may be expected given the incremental nature of evolution, reflecting true adaptation for robustness rather than an incidental effect. The results reported here indicate that most of the nonrandomness in the amino acids to codon assignments can be explained by incremental code evolution, with a small residue of orderliness that may reflect code adaptation.     

The genetic code--40 years on

The genetic code discovered 40 years ago, consists of 64 triplets (codons) of nucleotides. The genetic code is almost universal. The same codons are assigned to the same amino acids and to the same START and STOP signals in the vast majority of genes in animals, plants, and microorganisms. Each codon encodes for one of the 20 amino acids used in the synthesis of proteins. That produces some redundancy in the code and most of the amino acids being encoded by more than one codon. The two cases have been found where selenocysteine or pyrrolysine, that are not one of the standard 20 is inserted by a tRNA into the growing polypeptide.     

The direct genetic encoding of pyrrolysine

Pyrrolysine is an amino acid encoded by the amber codon in genes required for methylamine utilization by members of the Methanosarcinaceae. Pyrrolysine and selenocysteine share the distinction of being the only two non-canonical amino acids that have entered natural genetic codes. Recent experiments have shown that encoding of pyrrolysine, unlike that of selenocysteine, also shares an important trait of the original set of twenty amino acids. UAG is translated as pyrrolysine with the participation of a dedicated aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Expression of the genes encoding the pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase and its cognate tRNA is sufficient to add pyrrolysine to the genetic code of a recombinant organism. Thus, the recruitment of pyrrolysine into the genetic code involved evolution of the first non-canonical aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase and cognate tRNA to be described from nature.     

The Genetic Code—More Than Just a Table

The standard codon table is a primary tool for basic understanding of molecular biology. In the minds of many, the table’s orderly arrangement of bases and amino acids is synonymous with the true genetic code, i.e., the biological coding principle itself. However, developments in the field reveal a much more complex and interesting picture. In this article, we review the traditional codon table and its limitations in light of the true complexity of the genetic code. We suggest the codon table be brought up to date and, as a step, we present a novel superposition of the BLOSUM62 matrix and an allowed point mutation matrix. This superposition depicts an important aspect of the true genetic code—its ability to tolerate mutations and mistranslations.     

Selection, history and chemistry: the three faces of the genetic code.

The genetic code might be a historical accident that was fixed in the last common ancestor of modern organisms. 'Adaptive', 'historical' and 'chemical' arguments, however, challenge such a 'frozen accident' model. These arguments propose that the current code is somehow optimal, reflects the expansion of a more primitive code to include more amino acids, or is a consequence of direct chemical interactions between RNA and amino acids, respectively. Such models are not mutually exclusive, however. They can be reconciled by an evolutionary model whereby stereochemical interactions shaped the initial code, which subsequently expanded through biosynthetic modification of encoded amino acids and, finally, was optimized through codon reassignment. Alternatively, all three forces might have acted in concert to assign the 20 'natural' amino acids to their present positions in the genetic code.     

Evolution of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and the origin of the genetic code

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases exist as two enzyme families which were apparently generated by divergent evolution from two primordial synthetases. The two classes of enzymes exhibit intriguing familial relationships, in that they are distributed nonrandomly within the codon-amino acid matrix of the genetic code. For example, all XCX codons code for amino acids handled by class II synthetases, and all but one of the XUX codons code for amino acids handled by class I synthetases. One interpretation of these patterns is that the synthetases coevolved with the genetic code. The more likely explanation, however, is that the synthetases evolved in the context of an already-established genetic code—a code which developed earlier in an RNA world. The rules which governed the development of the genetic code, and led to certain patterns in the coding catalog between codons and amino acids, would also have governed the subsequent evolution of the synthetases in the context of a fixed code, leading to patterns in synthetase distribution such as those observed. These rules are (1) conservative evolution of amino acid and adapter binding sites and (2) minimization of the disruptive effects on protein structure caused by codon meaning changes.