The adaptor protein beta-arrestin2 enhances endocytosis of the low density lipoprotein receptor

Endocytosis of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) in coated pits employs the clathrin adaptor protein ARH. Similarly, agonist-dependent endocytosis of heptahelical receptors in coated pits employs the clathrin adaptor beta-arrestin proteins. In mice fed a high fat diet, we found that homozygous deficiency of beta-arrestin2 increased total and LDL plus intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 23 and 53%, respectively (p < 0.05), but had no effect on high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. We therefore tested whether beta-arrestins could affect the constitutive endocytosis of the LDLR. When overexpressed in cells, beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2 each associated with the LDLR, as judged by co-immunoprecipitation, and augmented LDLR endocytosis by approximately 70%, as judged by uptake of fluorescent LDL. However, physiologic expression levels of only beta-arrestin2, and not beta-arrestin1, enhanced endogenous LDLR endocytosis (by 65%) in stably transfected beta-arrestin1/beta-arrestin2 double-knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Concordantly, when RNA interference was used to suppress expression of beta-arrestin2, but not beta-arrestin1, LDLR endocytosis was reduced. Moreover, beta-arrestin2-/- MEFs demonstrated LDLR endocytosis that was 50% less than cognate wild type MEFs. In fusion protein pull-down assays, beta-arrestin2 bound to the LDLR cytoplasmic tail stoichiometrically, and binding was abolished by mutation of LDLR Tyr807 to Ala. Mutation of LDLR cytoplasmic tail Ser833 to Asp enhanced both the affinity of LDLR fusion protein binding to beta-arrestin2, and the efficiency of LDLR endocytosis in cells expressing beta-arrestin2 physiologically. We conclude that beta-arrestin2 can bind to and enhance endocytosis of the LDLR, both in vitro and in vivo, and may thereby influence lipoprotein metabolism.     

Receptor-mediated endocytosis and intracellular trafficking of lipoproteins and transferrin in insect cells

While the intracellular pathways of ligands after receptor-mediated endocytosis have been studied extensively in mammalian cells, in insect cells these pathways are largely unknown. We transfected Drosophila Schneider line 2 (S2) cells with the human low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) and transferrin (Tf) receptor (TfR), and used endocytosis of LDL and Tf as markers. After endocytosis in mammalian cells, LDL is degraded in lysosomes, whereas Tf is recycled. Fluorescence microscopy analysis revealed that LDL and Tf are internalized by S2 cells transfected with LDLR or TfR, respectively. In transfectants simultaneously expressing LDLR and TfR, both ligands colocalize in endosomes immediately after endocytic uptake, and their location remained unchanged after a chase. Similar results were obtained with Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 cells that were transfected with TfR, suggesting that Tf is retained intracellularly by both cell lines. The insect lipoprotein, lipophorin, is recycled upon lipophorin receptor (LpR)-mediated endocytosis by mammalian cells, however, not after endocytosis by LpR-expressing S2 transfectants, suggesting that this recycling mechanism is cell-type specific. LpR is endogenously expressed by fat body tissue of Locusta migratoria for a limited period after an ecdysis. A chase following endocytosis of labeled lipophorin by isolated fat body tissue at this developmental stage resulted in a significant decrease of lipophorin-containing vesicles, indicative of recycling of the ligand.     

Procathepsin D interacts with prosaposin in cancer cells but its internalization is not mediated by LDL receptor-related protein

The cell surface binding, endocytosis, and lysosomal routing of procathepsin D (procath-D) in cancer cells are mostly independent of the mannose-6-phosphate (M6P) receptors. In an attempt to define the receptor involved, we intracellularly cross-linked procath-D with a 68-kDa protein that we identified with specific antibodies as prosaposin in human breast and ovarian cancer cell lines. In cancer cells, this protein-protein interaction was resistant to ammonium chloride or M6P treatment, indicating that it was independent of the M6P receptors. A similar interaction also occurred in the breast cancer cell culture medium between the secreted prosaposin and procath-D. Since these two precursors can be endocytosed, we then determined whether they were interacting with the same cell surface receptor. In fibroblasts, we confirmed that the endocytosis of these two proteins was different since it was generally mediated by the M6P receptors for procath-D and mostly by LRP (LDL receptor-related protein) for prosaposin. In breast cancer cells, prosaposin endocytosis was not detected, in contrast to procath-D endocytosis, suggesting that the majority of procath-D is not internalized as a complex with prosaposin. Moreover, RAP (receptor-associated protein), a ligand inhibiting LRP-mediated endocytosis, prevented internalization of prosaposin in 49-F rat fibroblasts, but did not affect procath-D M6P-independent internalization in MDA-MB231 cells. We conclude that in breast cancer cells, even though procath-D interacts intracellularly and extracellarly with prosaposin, it is endocytosed independent of prosaposin by a receptor different from the M6P receptors and the LRP.     

Identification of a VLDL-induced, FDNPVY-independent internalization mechanism for the LDLR

The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) binds to and internalizes lipoproteins that contain apolipoproteinB100 (apoB100) or apolipoproteinE (apoE). Internalization of the apoB100 lipoprotein ligand, LDL, requires the FDNPVY(807) sequence on the LDLR cytoplasmic domain, which binds to the endocytic machinery of coated pits. We show here that inactivation of the FDNPVY(807) sequence by mutation of Y807 to cysteine prevented the uptake of LDL; however, this mutation did not prevent LDLR-dependent uptake of the apoE lipoprotein ligand, beta-VLDL. Comparison of the surface localization of the LDLR-Y807C using LDLR-immunogold, LDL-gold and beta-VLDL-gold probes revealed enrichment of LDLR-Y807C-bound beta-VLDL in coated pits, suggesting that beta-VLDL binding promoted the internalization of the LDLR-Y807C. Consistent with this possibility, treatment with monensin, which traps internalized LDLR in endosomes, resulted in the loss of surface LDLR-Y807C only when beta-VLDL was present. Reconstitution experiments in which LDLR variants were introduced into LDLR-deficient cells showed that the HIC(818) sequence is involved in beta-VLDL uptake by the LDLR-Y807C. Together, these experiments demonstrate that the LDLR has a very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-induced, FDNPVY-independent internalization mechanism.     

LRP6 protein regulates low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-mediated LDL uptake

Genetic variations in LRP6 gene are associated with high serum LDL cholesterol levels. We have previously shown that LDL clearance in peripheral B-lymphocytes of the LRP6(R611C) mutation carriers is significantly impaired. In this study we have examined the role of wild type LRP6 (LRP6(WT)) and LRP6(R611C) in LDL receptor (LDLR)-mediated LDL uptake. LDL binding and uptake were increased when LRP6(WT) was overexpressed and modestly reduced when it was knocked down in LDLR-deficient CHO (ldlA7) cells. These findings implicated LRP6 in LDLR-independent cellular LDL binding and uptake. However, LRP6 knockdown in wild type CHO cells resulted in a much greater decline in LDL binding and uptake compared with CHO-ldlA7 cells, suggesting impaired function of the LDLR. LDLR internalization was severely diminished when LRP6 was knocked down and was restored after LRP6 was reintroduced. Further analysis revealed that LRP6(WT) forms a complex with LDLR, clathrin, and ARH and undergoes a clathrin-mediated internalization after stimulation with LDL. LDLR and LRP6 internalizations as well as LDL uptake were all impaired in CHO-k1 cells expressing LRP6(R611C). These studies identify LRP6 as a critical modulator of receptor-mediated LDL endocytosis and introduce a mechanism by which variation in LRP6 may contribute to high serum LDL levels.     

The modular adaptor protein ARH is required for low density lipoprotein (LDL) binding and internalization but not for LDL receptor clustering in coated pits

ARH is an adaptor protein required for efficient endocytosis of low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors (LDLRs) in selected tissues. Individuals lacking ARH (ARH-/-) have severe hypercholesterolemia due to impaired hepatic clearance of LDL. Immortalized lymphocytes, but not fibroblasts, from ARH-deficient subjects fail to internalize LDL. To further define the role of ARH in LDLR function, we compared the subcellular distribution of the LDLR in lymphocytes from normal and ARH-/- subjects. In normal lymphocytes LDLRs were predominantly located in intracellular compartments, whereas in ARH-/- cells the receptors were almost exclusively on the plasma membrane. Biochemical assays and quantification of LDLR by electron microscopy indicated that ARH-/- lymphocytes had >20-fold more LDLR on the cell surface and a approximately 27-fold excess of LDLR outside of coated pits. The accumulation of LDLR on the cell surface was not due to failure of receptors to localize in coated pits since the number of LDLRs in coated pits was similar in ARH-/- and normal cells. Despite the dramatic increase in cell surface receptors, LDL binding was only 2-fold higher in the ARH-/- lymphocytes. These findings indicate that ARH is required not only for internalization of the LDL.LDLR complex but also for efficient binding of LDL to the receptor and suggest that ARH stabilizes the associations of the receptor with LDL and with the invaginating portion of the budding pit, thereby increasing the efficiency of LDL internalization.     

Secreted PCSK9 downregulates low density lipoprotein receptor through receptor-mediated endocytosis

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is a protease that regulates low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) protein levels. The mechanisms of this action, however, remain to be defined. We show here that recombinant human PCSK9 expressed in HEK293 cells was readily secreted into the medium, with the prosegment associated with the C-terminal domain. Secreted PCSK9 mediated cell surface LDLR degradation in a concentration- and time-dependent manner when added to HEK293 cells. Accordingly, cellular LDL uptake was significantly reduced as well. When infused directly into C57B6 mice, purified human PCSK9 substantially reduced hepatic LDLR protein levels and resulted in increased plasma LDL cholesterol. When added to culture medium, fluorescently labeled PCSK9 was endocytosed and displayed endosomal-lysosomal intracellular localization in HepG2 cells, as was demonstrated by colocalization with DiI-LDL. PCSK9 endocytosis was mediated by LDLR as LDLR deficiency (hepatocytes from LDLR null mice), or RNA interference-mediated knockdown of LDLR markedly reduced PCSK9 endocytosis. In addition, RNA interference knockdown of the autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia (ARH) gene product also significantly reduced PCSK9 endocytosis. Biochemical analysis revealed that the LDLR extracellular domain interacted directly with secreted PCSK9; thus, overexpression of the LDLR extracellular domain was able to attenuate the reduction of cell surface LDLR levels by secreted PCSK9. Together, these results reveal that secreted PCSK9 retains biological activity, is able to bind directly to the LDLR extracellular domain, and undergoes LDLR-ARH-mediated endocytosis, leading to accelerated intracellular degradation of the LDLR.     

Ligand size as a determinant for catabolism by the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor pathway. A lattice model for LDL binding

Low density lipoproteins (LDL) are large (Mr = 2.5 x 10(6)) in comparison to LDL receptors (Mr = 115,000). Since most LDL receptors are clustered in coated pits, we tested the hypothesis that crowding of receptor-bound LDL particles would cause steric effects. The apparent affinity of LDL for receptors on cultured fibroblasts decreased near saturation causing concave-upward Scatchard plots. Both the higher and lower affinity components of binding were up-regulated by the cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, lovastatin, indicating that the entire binding curve was sterol-responsive. In contrast, neither component of LDL binding was present on lovastatin-treated or untreated null fibroblasts which are incapable of expressing LDL receptors. Therefore, the concave-upward Scatchard plots were entirely due to binding to LDL receptors. These results are consistent with a lattice model in which receptor-bound LDL are large enough to decrease binding to adjacent receptors. A lattice model implies that large LDL should produce steric effects at a lower receptor occupancy than should small LDL. This was tested using seven LDL fractions that differed in diameter from 20 to 27 nm. Fewer large than small LDL were bound to the cell surface at 4 degrees C and 37 degrees C, and fewer were internalized and degraded at 37 degrees C. Since large LDL bound via both apolipoprotein (apo) E and apoB100, receptor cross-linking could have caused fewer large LDL to be bound at saturation. However, when the potential for cross-linking was prevented by an apo-E-specific monoclonal antibody (1D7), the difference in binding by large versus small LDL was not eliminated; instead, it was exaggerated. Taken together, these results support a lattice model for LDL binding and indicate that steric hindrance associated with crowding of LDL particles on receptor lattices is a major determinant for catabolism by the LDL receptor pathway in vitro.     

The PX-domain protein SNX17 interacts with members of the LDL receptor family and modulates endocytosis of the LDL receptor

Sorting nexins (SNXs) comprise a family of proteins characterized by the presence of a phox-homology domain, which mediates the association of these proteins with phosphoinositides and recruits them to specific membranes or vesicular structures within cells. Although only limited information about SNXs and their functions is available, they seem to be involved in membrane trafficking and sorting processes by directly binding to target proteins such as certain growth factor receptors. We show that SNX17 binds to the intracellular domain of some members of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) family such as LDLR, VLDLR, ApoER2 and LDLR-related protein. SNX17 resides on distinct vesicular structures partially overlapping with endosomal compartments characterized by the presence of EEA1 and rab4. Using rhodamine-labeled LDL, it was possible to demonstrate that during endocytosis, LDL passes through SNX17-positive compartments. Functional studies on the LDLR pathway showed that SNX17 enhances the endocytosis rate of this receptor. Our results identify SNX17 as a novel adaptor protein for LDLR family members and define a novel mechanism for modulation of their endocytic activity.     

Amino acid starvation‐induced LDLR trafficking accelerates lipoprotein endocytosis and LDL clearance

Mammalian cells utilize Akt‐dependent signaling to deploy intracellular Glut4 toward cell surface to facilitate glucose uptake. Low‐density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) is the cargo receptor mediating endocytosis of apolipoprotein B‐containing lipoproteins. However, signaling‐controlled regulation of intracellular LDLR trafficking remains elusive. Here, we describe a unique amino acid stress response, which directs the deployment of intracellular LDLRs, causing enhanced LDL endocytosis, likely via Ca²⁺ and calcium/calmodulin‐dependent protein kinase II‐mediated signalings. This response is independent of induction of autophagy. Amino acid stress‐induced increase in LDL uptake in vitro is comparable to that by pravastatin. In vivo, acute AAS challenge for up to 72 h enhanced the rate of hepatic LDL uptake without changing the total expression level of LDLR. Reducing dietary amino acids by 50% for 2 to 4 weeks ameliorated high fat diet‐induced hypercholesterolemia in heterozygous LDLR‐deficient mice, with reductions in both LDL and VLDL fractions. We suggest that identification of signaling‐controlled regulation of intracellular LDLR trafficking has advanced our understanding of the LDLR biology, and may benefit future development of additional therapeutic strategies for treating hypercholesterolemia.     

Human low density lipoprotein receptor expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Conserved signals for O-linked glycosylation and receptor-mediated endocytosis

The human low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor is shown to carry out efficient receptor-mediated endocytosis in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Microinjection of mRNAs encoding the human receptor led to synthesis of a 120-kDa precursor possessing high mannose N-linked sugars and core O-linked sugars. During its transport to the cell surface, the protein increased in apparent size to 160 kDa, which is similar to the change that occurs in human cells. This increase was not seen when the receptor lacked the serine/threonine-rich region that undergoes O-linked glycosylation. The surface receptors bound 125I-LDL at 0 degrees C and internalized it with a half-time of 2 min when the cells were warmed to 19 degrees C. The rate of internalization was slowed by 7-fold when a single residue in the cytoplasmic domain (Tyr807) was changed to a cysteine, an alteration that slows incorporation into coated pits in mammalian cells. Deletion of the cytoplasmic domain abolished rapid internalization. We conclude that the signals for O-linked glycosylation and receptor-mediated endocytosis of the LDL receptor have been conserved throughout vertebrate evolution.     

The complex of the insect LDL receptor homolog, lipophorin receptor, LpR, and its lipoprotein ligand does not dissociate under endosomal conditions

The insect low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR) homolog, lipophorin receptor (LpR), mediates endocytic uptake of the single insect lipoprotein, high-density lipophorin (HDLp), which is structurally related to LDL. However, in contrast to the fate of LDL, which is endocytosed by LDLR, we previously demonstrated that after endocytosis, HDLp is sorted to the endocytic recycling compartment and recycled for re-secretion in a transferrin-like manner. This means that the integrity of the complex between HDLp and LpR is retained under endosomal conditions. Therefore, in this study, the ligand-binding and ligand-dissociation capacities of LpR were investigated by employing a new flow cytometric assay, using LDLR as a control. At pH 5.4, the LpR-HDLp complex remained stable, whereas that of LDLR and LDL dissociated. Hybrid HDLp-binding receptors, containing either the beta-propeller or both the beta-propeller and the hinge region of LDLR, appeared to be unable to release ligand at endosomal pH, revealing that the stability of the complex is imparted by the ligand-binding domain of LpR. The LpR-HDLp complex additionally appeared to be EDTA-resistant, excluding a low Ca(2+) concentration in the endosome as an alternative trigger for complex dissociation. From binding of HDLp to the above hybrid receptors, it was inferred that the stability upon EDTA treatment is confined to LDLR type A (LA) ligand-binding repeats 1-7. Additional (competition) binding experiments indicated that the binding site of LpR for HDLp most likely involves LA-2-7. It is therefore proposed that the remarkable stability of the LpR-HDLp complex is attributable to this binding site. Together, these data indicate that LpR and HDLp travel in complex to the endocytic recycling compartment, which constitutes a key determinant for ligand recycling by LpR.     

Adaptor protein ARH is recruited to the plasma membrane by low density lipoprotein (LDL) binding and modulates endocytosis of the LDL/LDL receptor complex in hepatocytes

ARH is a newly discovered adaptor protein required for the efficient activity of low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) in selected tissues. Individuals lacking ARH have severe hypercholesterolemia due to an impaired hepatic clearance of LDL. It has been demonstrated that ARH is required for the efficient internalization of the LDL-LDLR complex and to stabilize the association of the receptor with LDL in Epstein-Barr virus-immortalized B lymphocytes. However, little information is available on the role of ARH in liver cells. Here we provide evidence that ARH is codistributed with LDLR on the basolateral area in confluent HepG2-polarized cells. This distribution is not modified by the overexpression of LDLR. Conversely, the activation of the LDLR-mediated endocytosis, but not the binding of LDL to LDLR, promotes a significant colocalization of ARH with LDL-LDLR complex that peaked at 2 min at 37 degrees C. To further assess the role of ARH in LDL-LDLR complex internalization, we depleted ARH protein using the RNA interference technique. Twenty-four hours after transfection with ARH-specific RNA interference, ARH protein was depleted in HepG2 cells by more than 70%. Quantitative immunofluorescence analysis revealed that the depletion of ARH caused about 80% reduction in LDL internalization. Moreover, our findings indicate that ARH is associated with other proteins of the endocytic machinery. We suggest that ARH is an endocytic sorting adaptor that actively participates in the internalization of the LDL-LDLR complex, possibly enhancing the efficiency of its packaging into the endocytic vesicles.     

Signalling through phospholipase C interferes with clathrin-mediated endocytosis

We investigated if phosphatidylinositol(4,5)bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) hydrolysis by phospholipase C activation through cell surface receptors would interfere with clathrin-mediated endocytosis as recruitment of clathrin assembly proteins is PtdIns(4,5)P2-dependent. In the WKPT renal epithelial cell line, endocytosed insulin and beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2gpI) were observed in separate compartments, although endocytosis of both ligands was clathrin-dependent as demonstrated by expression of the clathrin-binding C-terminal domain of AP180 (AP180-C). The two uptake mechanisms were different as only insulin uptake was reduced when the mu2-subunit of the adaptor complex AP-2 was silenced by RNA interference. ATP receptors are expressed at the apical surface of renal cells and, thus, we examined the effect of extracellular ATP on insulin and beta2gpI uptake. ATP stimulated phospholipase C activity, and also suppressed uptake of insulin, but not beta2gpI. This effect was reversed by the PLC inhibitor U-73122. In polarized cell cultures, insulin uptake was apical, whereas beta2gpI uptake was through the basolateral membrane, thus providing an explanation for selective inhibition of insulin endocytosis by ATP. Taken together, these results demonstrate that stimulation of apical G-protein-coupled P2Y receptors, which are coupled to phospholipase C activation diminishes clathrin-mediated endocytosis without interfering with basolateral endocytic mechanisms.     

Transforming growth factor beta activates Smad2 in the absence of receptor endocytosis

Like many other cell surface receptors, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) receptors are internalized upon ligand stimulation. Given that the signaling-facilitating molecules Smad anchor for receptor activation (SARA) and Hrs are mainly localized in early endosomes, it was unclear whether receptor internalization is required for Smad2 activation. Using reversible biotin labeling, we directly monitored internalization of the TGF-beta type I receptor. Our data indicate that TGF-beta type I receptor is endocytosed via a clathrin-dependent mechanism and is effectively blocked by depletion of intracellular potassium or by expression of a mutant dynamin (K44A). However, blockage of receptor endocytosis by these two means has no effect on TGF-beta-mediated Smad2 activation. Furthermore, TGF-beta-induced Smad2 activation was unaffected by inhibition of hVPS34 activity with wortmannin or inhibitory anti-hVPS34 antibodies. Finally, we demonstrated that Smad2 interacted with cell surface receptors and that a SARA binding-deficient Smad2 mutant was phosphorylated by the receptors. Thus, our findings suggest that receptor endocytosis is dispersible for TGF-beta-mediated activation of Smad2 and that this activation can be mediated by both SARA-dependent and -independent mechanisms.     

Beta(2)-adrenergic receptor down-regulation. Evidence for a pathway that does not require endocytosis.

Sustained activation of most G protein-coupled receptors causes a time-dependent reduction of receptor density in intact cells. This phenomenon, known as down-regulation, is believed to depend on a ligand-promoted change of receptor sorting from the default endosome-plasma membrane recycling pathway to the endosome-lysosome degradation pathway. This model is based on previous studies of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor degradation and implies that receptors need to be endocytosed to be down-regulated. In stable clones of L cells expressing beta(2)-adrenergic receptors (beta(2)ARs), sustained agonist treatment caused a time-dependant decrease in both beta(2)AR binding sites and immuno-detectable receptor. Blocking beta(2)AR endocytosis with chemical treatments or by expressing a dominant negative mutant of dynamin could not prevent this phenomenon. Specific blockers of the two main intracellular degradation pathways, lysosomal and proteasome-associated, were ineffective in preventing beta(2)AR down-regulation. Further evidence for an endocytosis-independent pathway of beta(2)AR down-regulation was provided by studies in A431 cells, a cell line expressing both endogenous beta(2)AR and EGF receptors. In these cells, inhibition of endocytosis and inactivation of the lysosomal degradation pathway did not block beta(2)AR down-regulation, whereas EGF degradation was inhibited. These data indicate that, contrary to what is currently postulated, receptor endocytosis is not a necessary prerequisite for beta(2)AR down-regulation and that the inactivation of beta(2)ARs, leading to a reduction in binding sites, may occur at the plasma membrane.     

Dopamine D(3) receptors are down-regulated following heterologous endocytosis by a specific interaction with G protein-coupled receptor-associated sorting protein-1

The D(3) dopamine receptor is endocytosed through a heterologous mechanism mediated by phorbol esters. Here, we show that following this endocytosis the D(3) dopamine receptors fail to recycle and are instead targeted for degradation through an interaction with the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-associated sorting protein-1 (GASP-1). Furthermore, we identified a specific binding motif in the C terminus common to the D(3) and D(2) that confers GASP-1 binding. shRNA knockdown of GASP-1 delayed post-endocytic degradation of both the D(2) and D(3) dopamine receptors. In addition, mutation of the D(2) and D(3) receptor C termini to resemble the D(4), which does not interact with GASP-1, not only inhibited GASP-1 binding but slowed degradation after endocytosis. Conversely, mutation of the C terminus of the D(4) to resemble that of the D(2) and D(3) facilitated GASP-1 binding and promoted post-endocytic degradation of the mutant D(4) receptor. Thus, we have identified a motif that is both necessary and sufficient to promote GASP-1 binding and receptor degradation. In addition, these data demonstrated that GASP-1 can mediate post-endocytic degradation of dopamine receptors that have been endocytosed not only as a consequence of dopamine activation but also as a consequence of activation by phorbol esters.     

Constitutive activation and endocytosis of the complement factor 5a receptor: evidence for multiple activated conformations of a G protein-coupled receptor

Serpentine receptors relay hormonal or sensory stimuli to heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins). In most G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), binding of the agonist ligand elicits both stimulation of the G protein and endocytosis of the receptor. We have begun to address whether these responses reflect the same sets of conformational changes in the receptor using constitutively active mutants of the human complement factor 5a receptor (C5aR). Two different mutant receptors both constitutively activate G protein-mediated responses, but one (F251A) is endocytosed only in response to ligand stimulation, while the other (NQ) is constitutively internalized in the absence of ligand. Both the constitutive and ligand-dependent endocytosis are accompanied by recruitment of beta-arrestin to the receptor. An inactivating mutation (N296A) complements the NQ mutation, producing a receptor that is activated only upon exposure to agonist; this revertant receptor (NQ/N296A) is nevertheless constitutively endocytosed. Thus one mutant (F251A) requires agonist for triggering endocytosis but not for activation of the downstream G protein signal, while another (NQ/N296A) behaves in the opposite fashion. Dissociation of two responses normally dependent on agonist binding indicates that the corresponding functions of an activated GPCR reflect different sets of changes in the receptor's conformation .     

Internalized PCSK9 dissociates from recycling LDL receptors in PCSK9-resistant SV-589 fibroblasts

Secreted PCSK9 binds to cell surface LDL receptor (LDLR) and directs the receptor for lysosomal degradation. PCSK9 is potent at inducing LDLR degradation in cultured liver-derived cells, but it is considerably less active in immortalized fibroblasts. We examined PCSK9 trafficking in SV-589 human skin fibroblasts incubated with purified recombinant wild-type PCSK9 or gain-of-function mutant PCSK9-D374Y with increased LDLR binding affinity. Despite LDLR-dependent PCSK9 uptake, cell surface LDLR levels in SV-589 fibroblasts were only modestly reduced by wild-type PCSK9, even at high nonphysiological concentrations (20 µg/ml). Internalized ¹²⁵I-labeled wild-type PCSK9 underwent lysosomal degradation at high levels, indicating its dissociation from recycling LDLRs. PCSK9-D374Y (2 µg/ml) reduced cell surface LDLRs by approximately 50%, but this effect was still blunted compared with HepG2 hepatoma cells. Radioiodinated PCSK9-D374Y was degraded less efficiently in SV-589 fibroblasts, and Alexa488-labeled PCSK9-D374Y trafficked to both lysosomes and endocytic recycling compartments. Endocytic recycling assays showed that more than 50% of internalized PCSK9-D374Y recycled to the cell surface compared with less than 10% for wild-type PCSK9. These data support that wild-type PCSK9 readily dissociates from the LDLR within early endosomes of SV-589 fibroblasts, contributing to PCSK9-resistance. Although a large proportion of gain-of-function PCSK9-D374Y remains bound to LDLR in these cells, degradative activity is still diminished.