Proteomics of chloroplast envelope membranes

Proteomics is a very powerful approach to link the information contained in sequenced genomes, like Arabidopsis, to the functional knowledge provided by studies of plant cell compartments, such as chloroplast envelope membranes. This review summarizes the present state of proteomic analyses of highly purified spinach and Arabidopsis envelope membranes. Methods targeted towards the hydrophobic core of the envelope allow identifying new proteins, and especially new transport systems. Common features were identified among the known and newly identified putative envelope inner membrane transporters and were used to mine the complete Arabidopsis genome to establish a virtual plastid envelope integral protein database. Arabidopsis envelope membrane proteins were extracted using different methods, that is, chloroform/methanol extraction, alkaline or saline treatments, in order to retrieve as many proteins as possible, from the most to the less hydrophobic ones. Mass spectrometry analyses lead to the identification of more than 100 proteins. More than 50% of the identified proteins have functions known or very likely to be associated with the chloroplast envelope. These proteins are (a) involved in ion and metabolite transport, (b) components of the protein import machinery and (c) involved in chloroplast lipid metabolism. Some soluble proteins, like proteases, proteins involved in carbon metabolism or in responses to oxidative stress, were associated with envelope membranes. Almost one third of the newly identified proteins have no known function. The present stage of the work demonstrates that a combination of different proteomics approaches together with bioinformatics and the use of different biological models indeed provide a better understanding of chloroplast envelope biochemical machinery at the molecular level.     

The hydrophobic proteome of mitochondrial membranes from Arabidopsis cell suspensions

The development of mitochondria and the integration of their function within a plant cell rely on the presence of a complex biochemical machinery located within their limiting membranes. The aim of the present work was: (1) to enhance our understanding of the biochemical machinery of mitochondrial membranes and (2) to test the versatility of the procedure developed for the identification of the hydrophobic proteome of the chloroplast envelope [Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2 (2003) 325-345]. A proteomic analysis was performed, to provide the most exhaustive view of the protein repertoire of these membranes. For this purpose, highly purified mitochondria were prepared from Arabidopsis cultured cells and membrane proteins were extracted. To get a more exhaustive array of membrane proteins from Arabidopsis mitochondria, from the most to the less hydrophobic ones, various extraction procedures (chloroform/methanol extraction, alkaline or saline treatments) were applied. LC-MS/MS analyses were then performed on each membrane subfraction, leading to the identification of more than 110 proteins. The identification of these proteins is discussed with respect to their mitochondrial localization, their physicochemical properties and their implications in the metabolism of mitochondria. In order to provide a new overview of the biochemical machinery of the plant mitochondria, proteins identified during this work were compared to the lists of proteins identified during previous proteomic analyses performed on plant and algae mitochondria (Arabidopsis, pea, Chlamydomonas, rice, etc.). A total of 502 proteins are listed. About 40% of the 114 proteins identified during this work were not identified during previous proteomic studies performed on mitochondria.     

Prediction of the plant beta-barrel proteome: a case study of the chloroplast outer envelope

In the postgenomic era, the transformation of genetic information into biochemical meaning is required. We have analyzed the proteome of the chloroplast outer envelope membrane by an in silico and a proteomic approach. Based on its evolutionary relation to the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, the outer envelope membrane should contain a large number of beta-barrel proteins. We therefore calculated the probability for the existence of beta-sheet, beta-barrel, and hairpin structures among all proteins of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. According to the existence of these structures, a number of candidates were selected. This protein pool was analyzed by TargetP to discard sequences with signals that would direct the protein to other organelles different from chloroplasts. In addition, the pool was manually controlled for the presence of proteins known to function outside of the chloroplast envelope. The approach developed here can be used to predict the topology of beta-barrel proteins. For the proteomic approach, proteins of highly purified outer envelope membranes of chloroplasts from Pisum sativum were analyzed by ESI-MS/MS mass spectrometry. In addition to the known components, four new proteins of the outer envelope membranes were identified in this study.     

Localization of a putative ClC chloride channel in spinach chloroplasts

Seven genes seem to encode for putative ClC chloride channels (AtClC-a to AtClC-g) in Arabidopsis thaliana. Their function and localization is still largely unknown. AtClC-f shares considerable sequence similarity with putative ClC channel proteins from Synechocystis, considered to represent the precursor of chloroplasts. We show by biochemical and mass spectrometry analysis that ClC-f is located in the outer envelope membrane of spinach chloroplasts. Consistent with the plastidial localization of ClC-f, p-chlorophenoxy-acetic acid (CPA) reduces photosynthetic activity and the protein is expressed in etioplasts and chloroplasts but not in root tissue. These findings may represent a step toward the molecular identification of ion channel activities in chloroplast membranes.     

Uncovering the Protein Lysine and Arginine Methylation Network in Arabidopsis Chloroplasts

Post-translational modification of proteins by the addition of methyl groups to the side chains of Lys and Arg residues is proposed to play important roles in many cellular processes. In plants, identification of non-histone methylproteins at a cellular or subcellular scale is still missing. To gain insights into the extent of this modification in chloroplasts we used a bioinformatics approach to identify protein methyltransferases targeted to plastids and set up a workflow to specifically identify Lys and Arg methylated proteins from proteomic data used to produce the Arabidopsis chloroplast proteome. With this approach we could identify 31 high-confidence Lys and Arg methylation sites from 23 chloroplastic proteins, of which only two were previously known to be methylated. These methylproteins are split between the stroma, thylakoids and envelope sub-compartments. They belong to essential metabolic processes, including photosynthesis, and to the chloroplast biogenesis and maintenance machinery (translation, protein import, division). Also, the in silico identification of nine protein methyltransferases that are known or predicted to be targeted to plastids provided a foundation to build the enzymes/substrates relationships that govern methylation in chloroplasts. Thereby, using in vitro methylation assays with chloroplast stroma as a source of methyltransferases we confirmed the methylation sites of two targets, plastid ribosomal protein L11 and the β-subunit of ATP synthase. Furthermore, a biochemical screening of recombinant chloroplastic protein Lys methyltransferases allowed us to identify the enzymes involved in the modification of these substrates. The present study provides a useful resource to build the methyltransferases/methylproteins network and to elucidate the role of protein methylation in chloroplast biology.     

Differential extraction of hydrophobic proteins from chloroplast envelope membranes: a subcellular-specific proteomic approach to identify rare intrinsic membrane proteins

Identification of rare hydrophobic membrane proteins is a major biological problem that is limited by the specific biochemical approaches required to extract these proteins from membranes and purify them. This is especially true for membranes, such as plastid envelope membranes, that have a high lipid content, present a wide variety of specific functions and therefore contain a large number of unique, but minor, proteins. We have optimized a procedure, based on the differential solubilization of membrane proteins in chloroform/methanol mixtures, to extract and concentrate the most hydrophobic proteins from chloroplast envelope membrane preparations, while more hydrophilic proteins were excluded. In addition to previously characterized chloroplast envelope proteins, such as the phosphate/triose phosphate translocator, we have identified new proteins that were shown to contain putative transmembrane α-helices. Moreover, using different chloroform/methanol mixtures, we have obtained differential solubilization of envelope proteins as a function of their hydrophobicity. All the proteins identified were genuine chloroplast envelope proteins, most of them being localized within the inner membrane. Our procedure enables direct mapping (by classical SDS-PAGE) and identification of hydrophobic membrane proteins, whatever their isoelectric point was, that are minor components of specific subcellular compartments. Thus, it complements other techniques that give access to peripheral membrane proteins. If applied to various cell membranes, it is anticipated that it can expedite the identification of hydrophobic proteins involved in transport systems for ions or organic solutes, or it may act as signal receptors or to control metabolic processes and vesicle trafficking.     

AKR2A-mediated import of chloroplast outer membrane proteins is essential for chloroplast biogenesis

In plant cells, chloroplasts have essential roles in many biochemical reactions and physiological responses. Chloroplasts require numerous protein components, but only a fraction of these proteins are encoded by the chloroplast genome. Instead, most are encoded by the nuclear genome and imported into chloroplasts from the cytoplasm post-translationally. Membrane proteins located in the chloroplast outer envelope membrane (OEM) have a critical function in the import of proteins into the chloroplast. However, the biogenesis of chloroplast OEM proteins remains poorly understood. Here, we report that an Arabidopsis ankyrin repeat protein, AKR2A, plays an essential role in the biogenesis of the chloroplast OEM proteins. AKR2A binds to chloroplast OEM protein targeting signals, as well as to chloroplasts. It also displays chaperone activity towards chloroplast OEM proteins, and facilitates the targeting of OEP7 to chloroplasts in vitro. AKR2A RNAi in plants with an akr2b knockout background showed greatly reduced levels of chloroplast proteins, including OEM proteins, and chloroplast biogenesis was also defective. Thus, AKR2A functions as a cytosolic mediator for sorting and targeting of nascent chloroplast OEM proteins to the chloroplast.     

Comparative proteomics of chloroplast envelopes from C3 and C4 plants reveals specific adaptations of the plastid envelope to C4 photosynthesis and candidate proteins required for maintaining C4 metabolite fluxes

C(4) plants have up to 10-fold higher apparent CO(2) assimilation rates than the most productive C(3) plants. This requires higher fluxes of metabolic intermediates across the chloroplast envelope membranes of C(4) plants in comparison with those of C(3) plants. In particular, the fluxes of metabolites involved in the biochemical inorganic carbon pump of C(4) plants, such as malate, pyruvate, oxaloacetate, and phosphoenolpyruvate, must be considerably higher in C(4) plants because they exceed the apparent rate of photosynthetic CO(2) assimilation, whereas they represent relatively minor fluxes in C(3) plants. While the enzymatic steps involved in the C(4) biochemical inorganic carbon pump have been studied in much detail, little is known about the metabolite transporters in the envelope membranes of C(4) chloroplasts. In this study, we used comparative proteomics of chloroplast envelope membranes from the C(3) plant pea (Pisum sativum) and mesophyll cell chloroplast envelopes from the C(4) plant maize (Zea mays) to analyze the adaptation of the mesophyll cell chloroplast envelope proteome to the requirements of C(4) photosynthesis. We show that C(3)- and C(4)-type chloroplasts have qualitatively similar but quantitatively very different chloroplast envelope membrane proteomes. In particular, translocators involved in the transport of triosephosphate and phosphoenolpyruvate as well as two outer envelope porins are much more abundant in C(4) plants. Several putative transport proteins have been identified that are highly abundant in C(4) plants but relatively minor in C(3) envelopes. These represent prime candidates for the transport of C(4) photosynthetic intermediates, such as pyruvate, oxaloacetate, and malate.     

Plastid division coordination across a double-membraned structure

Chloroplasts still retain components of the bacterial cell division machinery and research over the past decade has led to an understanding of how these stromal division proteins assemble and function as a complex chloroplast division machinery. However, during evolution plant chloroplasts have acquired a number of cytosolic division proteins, indicating that unlike the cyanobacterial ancestors of plastids, chloroplast division in higher plants require a second division machinery located on the chloroplast outer envelope membrane. Here we review the current understanding of the stromal and cytosolic plastid division machineries and speculate how two protein machineries coordinate their activities across a double-membraned structure.     

Protein import into chloroplasts

Most chloroplastic proteins are encoded in the nucleus, synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes and subsequently imported into the organelle. In general, proteins destined for the chloroplast are synthesized as precursor proteins with a cleavable N-terminal presequence that mediates routing to the inside of the chloroplast. These precursor proteins have to be targeted to the correct organellar membrane surface after their release from the ribosome and furthermore they have to be maintained in a conformation suitable for translocation across the two envelope membranes. Recognition and import of most chloroplastic precursor proteins are accomplished by a jointly used translocation apparatus. Different but complementary studies of several groups converged recently in the identification of the outer envelope proteins OEP86, OEP75, OEP70 (a Hsp 70-related protein), OEP34, and of the inner envelope protein IEP110 as components of this translocation machinery. None of these proteins, except for OEP70, shows any homology to components of other protein translocases. The plastid import machinery thus seems to be an original development in evolution. Following translocation into the organelle, chloroplastic proteins are sorted to their suborganellar destination, i.e., the inner envelope membrane, the thylakoid membrane, and the thylakoid lumen. This structural and evolutionary complexity of chloroplasts is reflected by a variety of routing mechanisms by which proteins reach their final location once inside the organelle. This review will focus on recent advances in the identification of components of the chloroplastic protein import machinery, and new insights into the pathways of inter-and intraorganellar sorting.     

Protein import into cyanelles and complex chloroplasts

Higher-plant, green and red algal chloroplasts are surrounded by a double membrane envelope. The glaucocystophyte plastid (cyanelle) has retained a prokaryotic cell wall between the two envelope membranes. The complex chloroplasts of Euglena and dinoflagellates are surrounded by three membranes while the complex chloroplasts of chlorarachniophytes, cryptomonads, brown algae, diatoms and other chromophytes, are surrounded by 4 membranes. The peptidoglycan layer of the cyanelle envelope and the additional membranes of complex chloroplasts provide barriers to chloroplast protein import not present in the simpler double membrane chloroplast envelope. Analysis of presequence structure and in vitro import experiments indicate that proteins are imported directly from the cytoplasm across the two envelope membranes and peptidoglycan layer into cyanelles. Protein import into complex chloroplasts is however fundamentally different. Analysis of presequence structure and in vitro import into microsomal membranes has shown that translocation into the ER is the first step for protein import into complex chloroplasts enclosed by three or four membranes. In vivo pulse chase experiments and immunoelectronmicroscopy have shown that in Euglena, proteins are transported from the ER to the Golgi apparatus prior to import across the three chloroplast membranes. Ultrastructural studies and the presence of ribosomes on the outermost of the four envelope membranes suggests protein import into 4 membrane-bounded complex chloroplasts is directly from the ER like outermost membrane into the chloroplast. The fundamental difference in import mechanisms, post-translational direct chloroplast import or co-translational translocation into the ER prior to chloroplast import, appears to reflect the evolutionary origin of the different chloroplast types. Chloroplasts with a two-membrane envelope are thought to have evolved through the primary endosymbiotic association between a eukaryotic host and a photosynthetic prokaryote while complex chloroplasts are believed to have evolved through a secondary endosymbiotic association between a heterotrophic or possibly phototrophic eukaryotic host and a photosynthetic eukaryote.     

植物细胞中蛋白质向叶绿体转运的研究进展

植物细胞中叶绿体的功能主要依赖于叶绿体蛋白, 大部分叶绿体蛋白由核基因组编码, 在细胞质中合成并经过正确的分选后, 通过叶绿体外膜上的Toc复合体和/或内膜上的Tic复合体转运到叶绿体的不同部位。该文主要综述可能参与叶绿体蛋白分选的胞质因子以及Toc和Tic组分如何参与叶绿体蛋白转运的研究进展。     

From nuclear genes to chloroplast localized proteins

There is broad evidence that an endosymbiotic uptake of a cyanobacterial-type organism was the point of origin for the evolution of chloroplasts. During organelle evolution extensive gene transfer from the symbiont to the host genome occurred, which raises the question of how these gene products, namely proteins, which are still functional in chloroplasts, find their way back ‘home’. Nuclear-encoded proteins enter plastids via a complex import machinery that requires the coordinate interplay of a variety of soluble and membrane-bound factors on the cytosolic site as well as on the stromal side of the chloroplast envelope membranes. We define that the process called ‘import of chloroplast precursor proteins’ begins with the release of the polypeptide from the ribosomes and binding to cytosolic factors, such as a guidance complex, which accompanies (chaperones) proteins to chloroplasts. The translocation across the envelope membranes engages distinct translocation machineries at the outer and the inner envelope membranes. Additionally subsequent sorting events to different subcompartments within the plastids are operated by a number of distinct pathways, all of which seem to involve multiple subunits, which are largely of bacterial (symbiotic) origin. The evolutionary history of proteins mediating the import of chloroplast constituents across the envelope membranes seems more diverse. Since cyanobacteria lack a protein import pathway, it is not surprising that only a few subunits of the chloroplast translocon seem to be of symbiotic origin while others seem to be eukaryotic additions.     

Cytosolic events involved in chloroplast protein targeting

Chloroplasts are unique organelles that are responsible for photosynthesis. Although chloroplasts contain their own genome, the majority of chloroplast proteins are encoded by the nuclear genome. These proteins are transported to the chloroplasts after translation in the cytosol. Chloroplasts contain three membrane systems (outer/inner envelope and thylakoid membranes) that subdivide the interior into three soluble compartments known as the intermembrane space, stroma, and thylakoid lumen. Several targeting mechanisms are required to deliver proteins to the correct chloroplast membrane or soluble compartment. These mechanisms have been extensively studied using purified chloroplasts in vitro. Prior to targeting these proteins to the various compartments of the chloroplast, they must be correctly sorted in the cytosol. To date, it is not clear how these proteins are sorted in the cytosol and then targeted to the chloroplasts. Recently, the cytosolic carrier protein AKR2 and its associated cofactor Hsp17.8 for outer envelope membrane proteins of chloroplasts were identified. Additionally, a mechanism for controlling unimported plastid precursors in the cytosol has been discovered. This review will mainly focus on recent findings concerning the possible cytosolic events that occur prior to protein targeting to the chloroplasts. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein Import and Quality Control in Mitochondria and Plastids.     

Crystal structure of a conserved domain in the intermembrane space region of the plastid division protein ARC6

The chloroplast division machinery is composed of numerous proteins that assemble as a large complex to divide double‐membraned chloroplasts through binary fission. A key mediator of division‐complex formation is ARC6, a chloroplast inner envelope protein and evolutionary descendant of the cyanobacterial cell division protein Ftn2. ARC6 connects stromal and cytosolic contractile rings across the two membranes through interaction with an outer envelope protein within the intermembrane space (IMS). The ARC6 IMS region bears a structurally uncharacterized domain of unknown function, DUF4101, that is highly conserved among ARC6 and Ftn2 proteins. Here we report the crystal structure of this domain from Arabidopsis thaliana ARC6. The domain forms an α/β barrel open towards the outer envelope membrane but closed towards the inner envelope membrane. These findings provide new clues into how ARC6 and its homologs contribute to chloroplast and cyanobacterial cell division.     

Chloroplast envelope proteins are encoded by the chloroplast genome of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

To characterize envelope proteins encoded by the chloroplast genome, envelopes were isolated from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells labeled with [35S] sulfate while blocking synthesis by cytoplasmic ribosomes. One and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of envelopes and fluorography revealed four highly labeled proteins. Two with masses of 29 and 30 kDa and pI 5.5 were absent from the stroma and thylakoid fractions, while the others at 54 kDa, pI 5.2 and 61 kDa, pI 5.4 were detected there in smaller amounts. The 29- and 30-kDa proteins were associated with outer envelope membranes separated from inner envelope membranes after chloroplast lysis in hypertonic solution. A 32-kDa protein not labeled by [35S]sulfate was found exclusively in the inner membrane fraction, suggesting the existence of a phosphate translocator in C. reinhardtii. To identify envelope proteins exposed on the chloroplast surface, isolated active chloroplasts were surface-labeled with 125I and lactoperoxidase. The 54-kDa, pI 5.2 protein as well as a protein corresponding to either of the 29- or 30-kDa proteins described above were among the labeled components. These results show that envelope proteins of C. reinhardtii are encoded by the chloroplast genome and two are located on the outer envelope membranes.     

Identification of Protein Transport Complexes in the Chloroplastic Envelope Membranes via Chemical Cross-Linking

Transport of cytoplasmically synthesized proteins into chloroplasts uses an import machinery present in the envelope membranes. To identify the components of this machinery and to begin to examine how these components interact during transport, chemical cross-linking was performed on intact chloroplasts containing precursor proteins trapped at a particular stage of transport by ATP limitation. Large crosslinked complexes were observed using three different reversible homobifunctional cross-linkers. Three outer envelope membrane proteins (OEP86, OEP75, and OEP34) and one inner envelope membrane protein (IEP110), previously reported to be involved in protein import, were identified as components of these complexes. In addition to these membrane proteins, a stromal member of the hsp100 family, ClpC, was also present in the complexes. We propose that ClpC functions as a molecular chaperone, cooperating with other components to accomplish the transport of precursor proteins into chloroplasts. We also propose that each envelope membrane contains distinct translocation complexes and that a portion of these interact to form contact sites even in the absence of precursor proteins.     

Immunogold labelling of cryosectioned pea chloroplasts and initial localization of the proteins associated with the protein import machinery

The electron-microscopic technique for immunogold labelling of thawed cryosectioned material (K.T. Tokuyasu, 1989, Histochem J 21: 163–171) has been adapted for use with isolated chloroplasts. Percoll-purified pea (Pisum Sativum L. cv Feltham First) chloroplasts were fixed in a buffered glutaraldehyde solution and then infiltrated with a buffered solution of 10% polyvinylpyrrolidone in 2.07 M sucrose prior to freezing in liquid nitrogen and sectioning in an ultracryomicrotome. Sections were thawed, immunolabelled, and stained with ammonium molybdate in methyl cellulose on Formvar/carbon-coated Cu or Cu/Pd electron-microscope grids. Cryosectioning gave excellent structural preservation and retained antigenicity. The effectiveness of this technique in localizing proteins to their specific chloroplast compartment was assayed using antibodies raised against: (i) the large subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), a stromal protein, (ii) the chloroplast ATP synthase (CF₁), a peripheral thylakoid protein, and (iii) different envelope membrane proteins. Antibodies raised against three members of the chloroplasticouterenvelopeprotein (OEP) import machinery, a 34-kDa protein (OEP34 or IAP34), the channel-forming 75-kDa protein (OEP75 or IAP75), and the 86-kDa precursor protein receptor (OEP86 or IAP86) were tested for their localization. The previous localization of OEP86, OEP75 and OEP34 to the outer envelope by biochemical methods was confirmed by our immuno electronmicroscopic analysis. Additionally, a constituent of the chloroplastic inner envelope protein (IEP) import machinery IEP 110 (IAP 100) was clearly localized to this membrane. Therefore, cryosectioning and immunogold labelling of intact chloroplasts provides a method for studying the localization of chloroplast proteins, especially those residing in the inner and outer envelope membranes.Abbreviations FCS fetal calf serum - IAP import intermediate associated protein - IEP inner envelope protein - OEP outer envelope protein (numbers signifying the relative molecular mass in kilodaltons) - PBS phosphate buffered saline - PVP polyvinyl pyrrolidone - Rubisco ribulose-1,5-biophosphate carboxylase/oxygenase     

Sulfolipid is a potential candidate for annexin binding to the outer surface of chloroplast

Using a subcellular-specific proteomic approach, we have identified by protein microsequencing, a putative 35-kDa annexin from among the chloroplast envelope polypeptides. To confirm this identification, we demonstrate that (a) a 35-kDa protein, identified as annexin by antibody cross-reactivity, co-purifies with Percoll-purified chloroplasts and their envelope membranes when extracted in the presence of Ca(2+) and (b) the native spinach annexin protein binds to chloroplast-specific lipids in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner. The binding of the spinach annexin to these glycerolipids occurs at similar Ca(2+) concentrations as those, which promote the interaction of annexins to phospholipids in other membranes. Among chloroplast glycerolipids known to be accessible on the cytosolic face (outer leaflet) of the outer envelope membrane, sulfolipid, and probably phosphatidylinositol, would be the sole candidates for a putative Ca(2+)-dependent interaction of annexin with the chloroplast surface.