The function, structure and regulation of E. coli peptide chain release factors

The termination of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli depends upon the soluble protein factors RF1 or RF2. RF1 catalyzes UAG and UAA dependent termination, while RF2 catalyzes UGA and UAA dependent termination. The proteins have been purified to homogeneity, their respective genes isolated, and their primary structures deduced from the DNA sequences. The sequences reveal considerable conserved homology, presumably reflecting functional similarities and a common ancestral origin. The RFs are encoded as single copy genes on the bacterial chromosome. RF2 exhibits autogenous regulation in an in vitro translation system. The mechanism of autoregulation appears to be an in-frame UGA stop codon that requires a 1+ frameshift for the continued synthesis of the protein. Frameshifting prior to the inframe stop codon occurs at a remarkably high frequency by an unknown mechanism. Future studies will be directed at understanding how RFs interact with the ribosomal components, and further defining the mechanism of RF2 frameshifting.     

Molecular recognition and catalysis in translation termination complexes

When the ribosome machinery reaches a stop codon in the mRNA, protein synthesis stops, and nascent polypeptide release is catalysed by class-I release factors (RFs); class-II RFs then promote the release of class-I RFs. Cryo electron microscopy structures of termination complexes and crystal structures of isolated factors have provided insights into key concepts such as bridging of active sites on the ribosome, and conformational changes that regulate the termination process. Recent crystal structures of the four possible functional ribosome complexes that contain the class-I RFs and the three stop codons have uncovered the molecular mechanisms by which RF1/RF2 (i) both recognise UAA, but discriminate specifically between UAG and UGA, and (ii) catalyse peptide release. Moreover, ongoing research also promises to reveal the structure-function relations of class-II RFs.     

Release Factor One Is Nonessential in Escherichia coli

Recoding a stop codon to an amino acid may afford orthogonal genetic systems for biosynthesizing new protein and organism properties. Although reassignment of stop codons has been found in extant organisms, a model organism is lacking to investigate the reassignment process and to direct code evolution. Complete reassignment of a stop codon is precluded by release factors (RFs), which recognize stop codons to terminate translation. Here we discovered that RF1 could be unconditionally knocked out from various Escherichia coli stains, demonstrating that the reportedly essential RF1 is generally dispensable for the E. coli species. The apparent essentiality of RF1 was found to be caused by the inefficiency of a mutant RF2 in terminating all UAA stop codons; a wild type RF2 was sufficient for RF1 knockout. The RF1-knockout strains were autonomous and unambiguously reassigned UAG to encode natural or unnatural amino acids (Uaas) at multiple sites, affording a previously unavailable model for studying code evolution and a unique host for exploiting Uaas to evolve new biological functions.     

Stop codon recognition and interactions with peptide release factor RF3 of truncated and chimeric RF1 and RF2 from Escherichia coli

Release factors RF1 and RF2 recognize stop codons present at the A-site of the ribosome and activate hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA to release the peptide chain. Interactions with RF3, a ribosome-dependent GTPase, then initiate a series of reactions that accelerate the dissociation of RF1 or RF2 and their recycling between ribosomes. Two regions of Escherichia coli RF1 and RF2 were identified previously as involved in stop codon recognition and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. We show here that removing the N-terminal domain of RF1 or RF2 or exchanging this domain between the two factors does not affect RF specificity but has different effects on the activity of RF1 and RF2: truncated RF1 remains highly active and able to support rapid cell growth, whereas cells with truncated RF2 grow only poorly. Transplanting a loop of 13 amino acid residues from RF2 to RF1 switches the stop codon specificity. The interaction of the truncated factors with RF3 on the ribosome is defective: they fail to stimulate guanine nucleotide exchange on RF3, recycling is not stimulated by RF3, and nucleotide-free RF3 fails to stabilize the binding of RF1 or RF2 to the ribosome. However, the N-terminal domain seems not to be required for the expulsion of RF1 or RF2 by RF3:GTP.     

Bacterial polypeptide release factor RF2 is structurally distinct from eukaryotic eRF1.

Bacterial release factor RF2 promotes termination of protein synthesis, specifically recognizing stop codons UAA or UGA. The crystal structure of Escherichia coli RF2 has been determined to a resolution of 1.8 A. RF2 is structurally distinct from its eukaryotic counterpart eRF1. The tripeptide SPF motif, thought to confer RF2 stop codon specificity, and the universally conserved GGQ motif, proposed to be involved with the peptidyl transferase center, are exposed in loops only 23 A apart, and the structure suggests that stop signal recognition is more complex than generally believed.     

The codon specificity of eubacterial release factors is determined by the sequence and size of the recognition loop

The two codon-specific eubacterial release factors (RF1: UAA/UAG and RF2: UAA/UGA) have specific tripeptide motifs (PXT/SPF) within an exposed recognition loop shown in recent structures to interact with stop codons during protein synthesis termination. The motifs have been inferred to be critical for codon specificity, but this study shows that they are insufficient to determine specificity alone. Swapping the motifs or the entire loop between factors resulted in a loss of codon recognition rather than a switch of codon specificity. From a study of chimeric eubacterial RF1/RF2 recognition loops and an atypical shorter variant in Caenorhabditis elegans mitochondrial RF1 that lacks the classical tripeptide motif PXT, key determinants throughout the whole loop have been defined. It reveals that more than one configuration of the recognition loop based on specific sequence and size can achieve the same desired codon specificity. This study has provided unexpected insight into why a combination of the two factors is necessary in eubacteria to exclude recognition of UGG as stop.     

Nonstandard genetic codes and translation termination

Genetic code is not universal. Various nonstandard versions of the code are known for some mitochondrial, prokaryotic, and eukaryotic genomes. The most common deviation is stop codon reassignment; i.e., a stop codon is decoded as a sense codon rather than as a signal for translation termination. Class 1 release factors (RFs: prokaryotic RF1 and RF2 and eukaryotic eRF1) recognize the stop codons and induce hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA in the ribosome. The specificity of class 1 RFs changes in organisms with a nonstandard code. The rare amino acids selenocysteine and pyrrolysine utilize essentially different decoding strategies. The review considers several hypotheses of the origin of nonstandard genetic codes. A new hypothesis is advanced, assuming a change in the specificity of class 1 RFs as a starting point for stop codon reassignment.     

Ribosomal protein L11 mutations in two functional domains equally affect release factors 1 and 2 activity

Bacterial release factors (RFs) 1 and 2 catalyse translation termination at UAG/UAA and UGA/UAA stop codons respectively. It has been shown that limiting the amount of ribosomal protein L11 affects translation termination at UAG and UGA differently. To understand the functional interplay between L11 and RF1/RF2, we isolated 21 distinct mutations in L11 as suppressors of either temperature-sensitive (ts) RF1/RF2 strains or read-through mutants of lacZ nonsense (UAG or UGA) strains. 10 of 21 mutants restored ts lethal growth of RF1 and/or RF2 strains. All the selected L11 mutants, including the RF1ts- and RF2ts-specific suppressors, had the same effect, either enhancing or reducing, on UAG and UGA termination efficiency in vivo. The specific properties of the selected L11 mutations remained unchanged in an RF3 deletion strain. Moreover, ribosomes absent of L11 had equally reduced activity for both RF1- and RF2-mediated peptide release in vitro. These results suggest that, unlike the previous notion, L11 has a common, cooperative role with RF1 and RF2. These L11 mutations were located on the surface of two domains of L11, and interpreted to affect the interaction between L11 and rRNA or the RFs thereby leading to the altered translation termination.     

Quantitative analysis of in vivo ribosomal events at UGA and UAG stop codons.

An in vivo translation assay system has been designed to measure, in one and the same assay, the three alternatives for a ribosome poised at a stop codon (termination, read-through and frameshift). A quantitative analysis of the competition has been done in the presence and absence of release factor (RF) mutants, nonsense suppressors and an upstream Shine-Dalgarno-like sequence. The ribosomal +1 frameshift product is measurable when the stop codon is decoded by wild-type or mutant RF (prf A1 or prf B2) and also in the presence of competing suppressor tRNAs. Frameshift frequency appears to be influenced by RF activity. The amount of frameshift product decreases in the presence of competing suppressor tRNAs, however, this decrease is not in proportion to the corresponding increase in the suppression product. Instead, there is an increase in the total amount of protein expressed from the gene, perhaps due to the purging of queued ribosomes. Mutated RFs reduce the total output of the reporter gene by reducing the amount of all three protein products. The nascent peptide has earlier been shown to influence the translation termination process by interacting with the RFs. At 42 degrees C in a temperature-sensitive RF mutant strain, protein measurements indicate that the nascent peptide seems to influence the binding efficiencies of the RFs.     

Structure of a human translation termination complex

In contrast to bacteria that have two release factors, RF1 and RF2, eukaryotes only possess one unrelated release factor eRF1, which recognizes all three stop codons of the mRNA and hydrolyses the peptidyl-tRNA bond. While the molecular basis for bacterial termination has been elucidated, high-resolution structures of eukaryotic termination complexes have been lacking. Here we present a 3.8 Å structure of a human translation termination complex with eRF1 decoding a UAA(A) stop codon. The complex was formed using the human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) stalling peptide, which perturbs the peptidyltransferase center (PTC) to silence the hydrolysis activity of eRF1. Moreover, unlike sense codons or bacterial stop codons, the UAA stop codon adopts a U-turn-like conformation within a pocket formed by eRF1 and the ribosome. Inducing the U-turn conformation for stop codon recognition rationalizes how decoding by eRF1 includes monitoring geometry in order to discriminate against sense codons.     

Class-1 translation termination factors: invariant GGQ minidomain is essential for release activity and ribosome binding but not for stop codon recognition

Previously, we have shown that all class-1 polypeptide release factors (RFs) share a common glycine-glycine-glutamine (GGQ) motif, which is critical for RF activity. Here, we subjected to site-directed mutagenesis two invariant amino acids, Gln185 and Arg189, situated in the GGQ minidomain of human eRF1, followed by determination of RF activity and the ribosome binding capacity for mutant eRF1. We show that replacement of Gln185 with polar amino acid residues causes partial inactivation of RF activity; Gln185Ile, Arg189Ala and Arg189Gln mutants are completely inactive; all mutants that retain partial RF activity respond similarly to three stop codons. We suggest that loss of RF activity for Gln185 and Arg189 mutants is caused by distortion of the conformation of the GGQ minidomain but not by damage of the stop codon recognition site of eRF1. Our data are inconsistent with the model postulating direct involvement of Gln185 side chain in orientation of water molecule toward peptidyl-tRNA ester bond at the ribosomal peptidyl transferase centre. Most of the Gln185 mutants exhibit reduced ability to bind to the ribosome, probably, to rRNA and/or (peptidyl)-tRNA(s). The data suggest that the GGQ motif is implicated both in promoting peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis and binding to the ribosome.     

Comparative study of translation termination sites and release factors (RF1 and RF2) in procaryotes

Translation termination is catalyzed by release factors that recognize stop codons. However, previous works have shown that in some bacteria, the termination process also involves bases around stop codons. Recently, Ito et al. analyzed release factors and identified the amino acids therein that recognize stop codons. However, the amino acids that recognize bases around stop codons remain unclear. To identify the candidate amino acids that recognize the bases around stop codons, we aligned the protein sequences of the release factors of various bacteria and searched for amino acids that were conserved specifically in the sequence of bacteria that seemed to regulate translation termination by bases around stop codons. As a result, species having several highly conserved residues in RF1 and RF2 showed positive correlations between their codon usage bias and conservation of the bases around the stop codons. In addition, some of the residues were located very close to the SPF motif, which deciphers stop codons. These results suggest that these conserved amino acids enable the release factors to recognize the bases around the stop codons. Present address (Y. Ozawa): Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM Japan, Ltd., 1623-14 Shimotsuruma, Yamato-shi, Kanagawa 242-8502, Japan     

Termination of translation in bacteria may be modulated via specific interaction between peptide chain release factor 2 and the last peptidyl-tRNA(Ser/Phe).

The 5' context of 671 Escherichia coli stop codons UGA and UAA has been compared with the context of stop-like codons (UAC, UAU and CAA for UAA; UGG, UGC, UGU and CGA for UGA). We have observed highly significant deviations from the expected nucleotide distribution: adenine is over-represented whereas pyrimidines are under-represented in position -2 upstream from UAA. Uridine is over-represented in position -3 upstream from UGA. Lysine codons are preferable immediately prior to UAA. A complete set of codons for serine and the phenylalanine UUC codon are preferable immediately 5' to UGA. This non-random codon distribution before stop codons could be considered as a molecular device for modulation of translation termination. We have found that certain fragment of E. coli release factor 2 (RF2) (amino acids 93-114) is similar to the amino acid sequences of seryl-tRNA synthetase (positions 10-19 and 80-93) and of beta (small) subunit (positions 72-94) of phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase from E. coli. Three-dimensional structure of E. coli seryl-tRNA synthetase is known [1]: Its N-terminus represents an antiparallel alpha-helical coiled-coil domain and contains a region homologous to RF2. On the basis of the above-mentioned results we assume that a specific interaction between RF2 and the last peptidyl-tRNA(Ser/Phe) occurs during polypeptide chain termination in prokaryotic ribosomes.     

Highly conserved region 1816-1831 of the 18S ribosomal RNA is close to the first nucleotide of the A-site codon in elongation and termination of translation

Two mRNA analogs, pUUCUAAA (with stop codon UAA) and pUUCUCAA (with Ser codon UCA) containing a perfluoroarylazido group at U4, were used to study the position relative to the 18S rRNA for the first nucleotide of the codon located in the A site of the human 80S ribosome. To place UAA or UCA in the A site, UCC-recognizing tRNAPhe was bound in the P site. With each analog, crosslinking was detected for highly conserved fragment 1816-1831, which contains invariant dinucleotide A1823/A1824 and is in helix 44 at the 3' end of the 18S rRNA. Since 18S rRNA modification did not depend on whether the U4 photoreactive group was in the sense or stop codon, it was assumed that polypeptide chain release factor 1 directly recognizes the trinucleotide of a stop codon located in the A site.     

Distinct eRF3 requirements suggest alternate eRF1 conformations mediate peptide release during eukaryotic translation termination

Organisms that use the standard genetic code recognize UAA, UAG, and UGA as stop codons, whereas variant code species frequently alter this pattern of stop codon recognition. We previously demonstrated that a hybrid eRF1 carrying the Euplotes octocarinatus domain 1 fused to Saccharomyces cerevisiae domains 2 and 3 (Eo/Sc eRF1) recognized UAA and UAG, but not UGA, as stop codons. In the current study, we identified mutations in Eo/Sc eRF1 that restore UGA recognition and define distinct roles for the TASNIKS and YxCxxxF motifs in eRF1 function. Mutations in or near the YxCxxxF motif support the cavity model for stop codon recognition by eRF1. Mutations in the TASNIKS motif eliminated the eRF3 requirement for peptide release at UAA and UAG codons, but not UGA codons. These results suggest that the TASNIKS motif and eRF3 function together to trigger eRF1 conformational changes that couple stop codon recognition and peptide release during eukaryotic translation termination.     

Thermodynamic and Kinetic Insights into Stop Codon Recognition by Release Factor 1

Stop codon recognition is a crucial event during translation termination and is performed by class I release factors (RF1 and RF2 in bacterial cells). Recent crystal structures showed that stop codon recognition is achieved mainly through a network of hydrogen bonds and stacking interactions between the stop codon and conserved residues in domain II of RF1/RF2. Additionally, previous studies suggested that recognition of stop codons is coupled to proper positioning of RF1 on the ribosome, which is essential for triggering peptide release. In this study we mutated four conserved residues in Escherichia coli RF1 (Gln185, Arg186, Thr190, and Thr198) that are proposed to be critical for discriminating stop codons from sense codons. Our thermodynamic and kinetic analysis of these RF1 mutants showed that the mutations inhibited the binding of RF1 to the ribosome. However, the mutations in RF1 did not affect the rate of peptide release, showing that imperfect recognition of the stop codon does not affect the proper positioning of RF1 on the ribosome.     

Highly Conserved Region 1816–1831 of the 18S Ribosomal RNA Is Close to the First Nucleotide of the A-Site Codon in Elongation and Termination of Translation

Two mRNA analogs, pUUCUAAA (with stop codon UAA) and pUUCUCAA (with Ser codon UCA) containing a perfluoroarylazido group at U4, were used to study the position relative to the 18S rRNA for the first nucleotide of the codon located in the A site of the human 80S ribosome. To place UAA or UCA in the A site, UCC-recognizing tRNA^Phe was bound in the P site. With each analog, crosslinking was detected for highly conserved fragment 1816–1831, which contains invariant dinucleotide A1823/A1824 and is in helix 44 at the 3" end of the 18S rRNA. Since 18S rRNA modification did not depend on whether the U4 photoreactive group was in the sense or stop codon, it was assumed that polypeptide chain release factor 1 directly recognizes the trinucleotide of a stop codon located in the A site.     

A tripeptide discriminator for stop codon recognition

Only recently has it been established that a tripeptide in the bacterial release factors (RFs), RF1 and RF2, is responsible for the stop codon recognition. This functional mimic of the anticodon of tRNA is referred to as a tripeptide 'anticodon' or a tripeptide discriminator. Here we review the experimental background and process leading to this discovery, and strengthen functional evidence for the tripeptide determinant for deciphering stop codons in mRNAs in prokaryotes.     

Recognition of the amber UAG stop codon by release factor RF1

We report the crystal structure of a termination complex containing release factor RF1 bound to the 70S ribosome in response to an amber (UAG) codon at 3.6‐Å resolution. The amber codon is recognized in the 30S subunit‐decoding centre directly by conserved elements of domain 2 of RF1, including T186 of the PVT motif. Together with earlier structures, the mechanisms of recognition of all three stop codons by release factors RF1 and RF2 can now be described. Our structure confirms that the backbone amide of Q230 of the universally conserved GGQ motif is positioned to contribute directly to the catalysis of the peptidyl‐tRNA hydrolysis reaction through stabilization of the leaving group and/or transition state. We also observe synthetic‐negative interactions between mutations in the switch loop of RF1 and in helix 69 of 23S rRNA, revealing that these structural features interact functionally in the termination process. These findings are consistent with our proposal that structural rearrangements of RF1 and RF2 are critical to accurate translation termination.     

Class I release factors in ciliates with variant genetic codes

In eukaryotes with the universal genetic code a single class I release factor (eRF1) most probably recognizes all stop codons (UAA, UAG and UGA) and is essential for termination of nascent peptide synthesis. It is well established that stop codons have been reassigned to amino acid codons at least three times among ciliates. The codon specificities of ciliate eRF1s must have been modified to accommodate the variant codes. In this study we have amplified, cloned and sequenced eRF1 genes of two hypotrichous ciliates, Oxytricha trifallax (UAA and UAG for Gln) and Euplotes aediculatus (UGA for Cys). We also sequenced/identified three protist and two archaeal class I RF genes to enlarge the database of eRF1/aRF1s with the universal code. Extensive comparisons between universal code eRF1s and those of Oxytricha, Euplotes, and Tetrahymena which represent three lineages that acquired variant codes independently, provide important clues to identify stop codon-binding regions in eRF1. Domain 1 in the five ciliate eRF1s, particularly the TASNIKS heptapeptide and its adjacent region, differs significantly from domain 1 in universal code eRF1s. This observation suggests that domain 1 contains the codon recognition site, but that the mechanism of eRF1 codon recognition may be more complex than proposed by Nakamura et al. or Knight and Landweber.