DNA-protein binding in interphase chromosomes

The metachromatic dye, azure B, was analyzed by microspectrophotometry when bound to DNA fibers and DNA in nuclei with condensed and dispersed chromatin. The interaction of DNA and protein was inferred from the amount of metachromasy (increased β/α-peak) of azure B that resulted after specific removal of various protein fractions. Dye bound to DNA-histone fibers and frog liver nuclei fixed by freeze-methanol substitution shows orthochromatic, blue-green staining under specific staining conditions, while metachromasy (blue or purple color) results from staining DNA fibers without histone or tissue nuclei after protein removal. The dispersed chromatin of hepatocytes was compared to the condensed chromatin of erythrocytes to see whether there were differences in DNA-protein binding in "active" and "inactive" nuclei. Extraction of histones with 0.02 N HCl, acidified alcohol, perchloric acid, and trypsin digestion all resulted in increased dye binding. The amount of metachromasy varied, however; removal of "lysine-rich" histone (extractable with 0.02 N HCl) caused a blue color, and a purplish-red color (µ-peak absorption) resulted from prolonged trypsin digestion. In all cases, the condensed and the dispersed chromatin behaved in the same way, indicating the similarity of protein bound to DNA in condensed and dispersed chromatin. The results appear to indicate that "lysine-rich" histone is bound to adjacent anionic sites of a DNA molecule and that nonhistone protein is located between adjacent DNA molecules in both condensed and dispersed chromatin.     

DNA methyltransferase 3b preferentially associates with condensed chromatin

In mammals, DNA methylation is catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) encoded by Dnmt1, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. Since, the mechanisms of regulation of Dnmts are still largely unknown, the physical interaction between Dnmt3b and chromatin was investigated in vivo and in vitro. In embryonic stem cell nuclei, Dnmt3b preferentially associated with histone H1-containing heterochromatin without any significant enrichment of silent-specific histone methylation. Recombinant Dnmt3b preferentially associated with nucleosomal DNA rather than naked DNA. Incorporation of histone H1 into nucleosomal arrays promoted the association of Dnmt3b with chromatin, whereas histone acetylation reduced Dnmt3b binding in vitro. In addition, Dnmt3b associated with histone deacetylase SirT1 in the nuclease resistant chromatin. These findings suggest that Dnmt3b is preferentially recruited into hypoacetylated and condensed chromatin. We propose that Dnmt3b is a 'reader' of higher-order chromatin structure leading to gene silencing through DNA methylation.     

Structural transition in chromatin induced by ions in solution

Structural transition in chromatin was measured as a function of counter ions in solution (NaCl or MgCl(2)) and of histones bound on the DNA. The addition of counter ions to aqueous solutions of chromatin, partially dehistonized chromatin, and DNA caused a drastic reduction in viscosity and a significant increase in sedimentation coefficient. Transitions occurred primarily at about 2 x 10(-3) M NaCl and 1 x 10(-5) M MgCl(2) and are interpreted as a change in structure of chromatin induced by tight binding of cations (Na(+) or Mg(++)) to DNA, either free or bound by histones, and is an intrinsic property of DNA rather than of the type of histone bound. At a given ionic condition, removal of histone H1 from chromatin had only a minor effect on the hydrodynamic properties of chromatin while removal of other histones caused a drastic change in these properties. An increase in the sedimentation coefficient of DNA was observed also for protamine. DNA complexes wherein the bound protein contains only unordered coil rather than the alpha-helices found in histones.     

Cell-cycle-dependent structural transitions in the human CENP-A nucleosome in vivo

In eukaryotes, DNA is packaged into chromatin by canonical histone proteins. The specialized histone H3 variant CENP-A provides an epigenetic and structural basis for chromosome segregation by replacing H3 at centromeres. Unlike exclusively octameric canonical H3 nucleosomes, CENP-A nucleosomes have been shown to exist as octamers, hexamers, and tetramers. An intriguing possibility reconciling these observations is that CENP-A nucleosomes cycle between octamers and tetramers in?vivo. We tested this hypothesis by tracking CENP-A nucleosomal components, structure, chromatin folding, and covalent modifications across the human cell cycle. We report that CENP-A nucleosomes alter from tetramers to octamers before replication and revert to tetramers after replication. These structural transitions are accompanied by reversible chaperone binding, chromatin fiber folding changes, and previously undescribed modifications within the histone fold domains of CENP-A and H4. Our results reveal a cyclical nature to CENP-A nucleosome structure and have implications for the maintenance of epigenetic memory after centromere replication.     

Quantitative analysis of HP1alpha binding to nucleosomal arrays

Elucidating how the metazoan genome is organised into distinct functional domains is fundamental to understanding all aspects of normal cellular growth and development. The "histone code" hypothesis predicts that post-translational modifications of specific histone residues regulate genomic function by selectively recruiting nuclear factors that modify chromatin structure. A paradigm supporting this hypothesis is the preferential binding of the silencing protein heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) to histone H3 trimethylated at K9. However, a caveat to several in vitro studies is that they employed histone N-terminal tail peptides to determine dissociation constants, thus ignoring any potential role of DNA and/or the underlying chromatin structure in the recruitment of HP1. Using a well-defined in vitro chromatin assembly system (employing a 12-208 DNA template), we describe here, the use of a fluorescence spectroscopic method that enabled us to measure and quantify the relative binding affinities of HP1alpha to unmodified and variant nucleosomal arrays. Using this approach, we previously demonstrated that mouse HP1alpha (i) binds with high affinity to naked DNA, (ii) has an intrinsic affinity for highly folded chromatin, (iii) has a 2-fold higher affinity for nucleosomal arrays when H2A is replaced with H2A.Z, and (iv) binds to DNA or chromatin in a non-cooperative manner.     

The archaeal histone-fold protein HMf organizes DNA into bona fide chromatin fibers.

BACKGROUND: The discovery of histone-like proteins in Archaea urged studies into the possible organization of archaeal genomes in chromatin. Despite recent advances, a variety of structural questions remain unanswered. RESULTS: We have used the atomic force microscope (AFM) with traditional nuclease digestion assays to compare the structure of nucleoprotein complexes reconstituted from tandemly repeated eukaryal nucleosome-positioning sequences and histone octamers, H3/H4 tetramers, and the histone-fold archaeal protein HMf. The data unequivocally show that HMf reconstitutes are indeed organized as chromatin fibers, morphologically indistinguishable from their eukaryal counterparts. The nuclease digestion patterns revealed a clear pattern of protection at regular intervals, again similar to the patterns observed with eukaryal chromatin fibers. In addition, we studied HMf reconstitutes on mononucleosome-sized DNA fragments and observed a great degree of similarity in the internal organization of these particles and those organized by H3/H4 tetramers. A difference in stability was observed at the level of mono-, di-, and triparticles between the HMf particles and canonical octamer-containing nucleosomes. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro reconstituted HMf-nucleoprotein complexes can be considered as bona fide chromatin structures. The differences in stability at the monoparticle level should be due to structural differences between HMf and core histone H3/H4 tetramers, i.e., to the complete absence in HMf of histone tails beyond the histone fold. We speculate that the existence of core histone tails in eukaryotes may provide a greater stability to nucleosomal particles and also provide the additional ability of chromatin structure to regulate DNA function in eukaryotic cells by posttranslational histone tail modifications.     

Comparison of the primary structure of reconstructed minimal nucleosomes and nucleosomes isolated from the chromatin

We have reconstructed nucleosomes from a histone octamer (H2A, H2B, H3, H4)2 and DNA 146 b.p. or 2-3 thousands b.p. in length. Comparison by means of DNA-histone cross-links of the primary organization of minimal nucleosomes obtained by reconstruction or isolated from chromatin of chicken erythrocyte nuclei has demonstrated a high similarity in histone location on their DNAs. Simultaneously, there have been observed some variations in the character of interaction for all core histones with DNA on nucleosomes. Thus, the cross-link of histone H4 with DNA of a core particle at H4 sites (65), unlike H4(55) and H4(88) sites, significantly depends on the superstructure of chromatin, ionic strength of solution and the presence of denaturating agents. All these differences are expected to probe the existence of conformational isomers for core particles. (Bracketed is the distance from the histone interaction site with the DNA of the core particle to the DNA 5'-terminus.)     

Two distinct mechanisms of chromatin interaction by the Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex in vivo

We have previously shown that Saccharomyces cerevisiae Isw2 complex slides nucleosomes to remodel chromatin in vivo. Our data suggested a model in which Isw2 complex binds the histone octamer and DNA separately to generate the force necessary for nucleosome movement. Here we find that the histone H4 "basic patch" is the only portion of any amino-terminal histone tail required for both target-specific association of Isw2 complex with chromatin and chromatin remodeling in vivo, whereas it is dispensable for basal levels of chromatin binding. Similarly, we find that nonremodeled chromatin structure and integrity of Isw2 complex are required only for target-specific association of Isw2 with chromatin. These data demonstrate fundamental differences between the target-specific and basal modes of chromatin binding by Isw2 complex in vivo and suggest that only the former involves contributions from DNA, histone H4, and sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. We propose a model for target recognition and chromatin remodeling by Isw2 complex in vivo.     

A model for chromatin based upon two symmetrically paired half-nucleosomes

We propose that the basic unit of chromatin is constructed of two isologously paired heterotypic protein tetramers each containing one molecule of H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 histone. These proteins form a core that holds 140 base pairs (bp) of DNA in a single left-handed, non-interwound DNA supercoil approximately 95 bp in circumference, creating A nucleosome particle (DNA and protein) organized about a dyad axis of symmetry. Such a nucleosome can open up into its separate half-nucleosomes to allow genetic readout without requiring histone displacement     

Dynamic Regulation of Effector Protein Binding to Histone Modifications: The Biology of HP1 Switching

Post-translational modifications of histone proteins, the basic building blocks around which eukaryotic DNA is organized, are crucially involved in the regulation of genome activity as they control chromatin structure and dynamics. The recruitment of specific binding proteins that recognize and interact with particular histone modifications is thought to constitute a fundamental mechanism by which histone marks mediate biological function. For instance, tri-methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me3) is important for recruiting heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) to discrete regions of the genome, thereby regulating gene expression, chromatin packaging, and heterochromatin formation. Until now, little was known about the regulation of effector-histone mark interactions, and in particular, of the binding of HP1 to H3K9me3. Recently, we and others presented evidence that a "binary methylation-phosphorylation switch" mechanism controls the dynamic release of HP1 from H3K9me3 during the cell cycle: phosphorylation of histone H3 serine 10 (H3S10ph) occurs at the onset of mitosis, interferes with HP1-H3K9me3 interaction, and therefore, ejects HP1 from its binding site. Here, we discuss the biological function of HP1 release from chromatin during mitosis, consider implications why the cell controls HP1 binding by such a methylation-phosphorylation switching mechanism, and reflect on other cellular pathways where binary switching of HP1 might occur.     

Thiol reactivity of histone H3 in soluble and DNA-associated histone complexes: evidence for allosteric and torsional regulation

The reactivity of chick erythrocyte and calf thymus histone H3 thiol groups toward 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) has been investigated both in the soluble, DNA-free state and in various nucleohistone complexes. We have found that the thiol reactivity of both tetramers and octamers decreases continuously as the ionic strength of the assay is increased, up to and beyond 2.0 M NaCl. Upon association of dimers with tetramers, there is loss of labeling by DTNB at one site, suggesting the existence of allosteric regulation [see also Godfrey, J. E., Eickbush, T. H., & Moudrianakis, E. N. (1980) Biochemistry 19, 1339-1346] of dimer-tetramer interfaces emanating from within the tetramer complex. Comparison of the thiol reactivities of chick and calf tetramers indicates that the thiol groups at amino acid positions 96 and 110 are not chemically equivalent. When the histones are associated with DNA, in either reconstituted complexes, core particles, or long soluble chromatin, the thiol reactivity is greatly diminished, and this "DNA effect" overwhelms any influence of dimers. However, if single-strand nicks are introduced into the DNA backbone of core particles and other chromatin-like complexes by the action of DNase I, the influence of the DNA double helix upon thiol reactivity is reduced, and the effect of dimers can be detected once again. We can therefore conclude that the DNA effect derives from intranucleosomal torsional strain of the continuum of the double helix in equilibrium with coupled protein conformational changes. These observations support the concept that the octamer complex is a dynamic tripartite structure whose properties can be modulated through its interactions with DNA and by changes occurring in the dimer-tetramer interfaces.     

Specific interaction of histone H1 with eukaryotic DNA.

The interaction of calf thymus histone H1 with homologous and heterologous DNA has been studied at different ionic strengths. It has been found that about 0.5 M NaCl histone H1, and its fragments N-H1 (residues 1-72) and C-H1 (residues 73-C terminal), precipitate selectively a small fraction of calf thymus DNA. This selective precipitation is preserved up to very high values (less than 2.0) of the input histone H1/DNA ratio. The percentage of DNA insolubilized by histone H1 under these ionic conditions is dependent upon the molecular weight of the nucleic acid, diminishing from 18% fro a Mw equals 1.0 x 10(7) daltons to 5% for a Mw equals 8.0 x 10(4) daltons. The base composition of the precipitated DNA is similar to that of the bulk DNA. Calf thymus histone H1 also selectively precipitates a fraction of DNA from other eukaryotes (herring, trout), but not from some prokaryotes (E. coli, phage gamma. On the other hand, at 0.5 M NaCl, the whole calf thymus DNA (but not E. coli DNA) presents a limited number of binding sites for histone H1, the saturation ratio histone H1 bound/total DNA being similar to that found in chromatin. A similar behavior is observed from the histone H1 fragments, N-H1 and C-H1, which bind to DNA in complementary saturation ratios. It is suggested that in eukaryotic organisms histone H1 molecules maintain specific interactions with certain DNA sequences. A fraction of such specific complexes could act as nucleation points for the high-order levels of chromatin organization.     

Linker histone H1 is present in centromeric chromatin of living human cells next to inner kinetochore proteins

The vertebrate kinetochore complex assembles at the centromere on α-satellite DNA. In humans, α-satellite DNA has a repeat length of 171bp slightly longer than the DNA in the chromatosome containing the linker histone H1. The centromere-binding protein CENP-B binds specifically to α-satellite DNA with properties of a centromeric-linker histone. Here, we analysed if linker histone H1 is present at or excluded from centromeric chromatin by CENP-B. By immunostaining we detected the presence, but no enrichment or depletion of five different H1 subtypes at centromeric chromatin. The binding dynamics of H1 at centromeric sites were similar to that at other locations in the genome. These dynamics did not change in CENP-B depleted cells, suggesting that CENP-B and H1 co-exist in centromeric chromatin with no or little functional overlap. By bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), we revealed that the linker histone H1 subtypes H1° and H1.2 bind to centromeric chromatin in interphase nuclei in direct neighbourhood to inner kinetochore proteins.     

Calreticulin as a new histone binding protein in mitotic chromosomes

Calreticulin (CRT) is a multifunctional Ca(2+)-binding protein that mainly functions in the endoplasmic reticulum as a molecular chaperone for newly synthesized proteins. Recently we reported the protein composition of human metaphase chromosomes (Uchiyama et al., 2004), which included CRT. Here we describe new characteristics of CRT in vitro as well as its localization on the surface of metaphase chromosomes in vivo. CRT was detected in the chromosomal fraction by Western blotting and its binding partners were identified as core and linker histones by ligand overlay assay. Surface plasmon resonance sensor analyses revealed that CRT is bound to chromatin fibers. Moreover, we found that CRT has both supercoiling activity, which assists core histone assembly into chromatin fibers, and binding ability to histone H2A/H2B dimers and histone H3/H4 tetramers. Unlike the chromosome scaffold proteins, indirect immunofluorescent staining revealed that CRT is located on the surface of metaphase chromosomes. These results suggest that CRT plays a role which involves chromatin dynamics on the surface of mitotic chromosomes.     

The intrinsically disordered distal face of nucleoplasmin recognizes distinct oligomerization states of histones

The role of Nucleoplasmin (NP) as a H2A-H2B histone chaperone has been extensively characterized. To understand its putative interaction with other histone ligands, we have characterized its ability to bind H3-H4 and histone octamers. We find that the chaperone forms distinct complexes with histones, which differ in the number of molecules that build the assembly and in their spatial distribution. When complexed with H3-H4 tetramers or histone octamers, two NP pentamers form an ellipsoidal particle with the histones located at the center of the assembly, in stark contrast with the NP/H2A-H2B complex that contains up to five histone dimers bound to one chaperone pentamer. This particular assembly relies on the ability of H3-H4 to form tetramers either in solution or as part of the octamer, and it is not observed when a variant of H3 (H3C110E), unable to form stable tetramers, is used instead of the wild-type protein. Our data also suggest that the distal face of the chaperone is involved in the interaction with distinct types of histones, as supported by electron microscopy analysis of the different NP/histone complexes. The use of the same structural region to accommodate all type of histones could favor histone exchange and nucleosome dynamics.