Comparison of the "nursing" and other parental behaviors of nulliparous and lactating female rats

Virgin female rats display maternal behaviors after continuous exposure to pups (sensitization) that are in some respects similar to those of postpartum females. We herein provide a detailed comparison of the "nursing" and other parental behaviors of maternally sensitized virgin females and postpartum lactating dams. Ovariectomized and intact virgin females were exposed to pups until displaying maternal behavior. On the females' fourth day of maternal responsiveness, the pups were removed for 3 h and then returned, and subject-litter interactions were observed for 45 min. Behavior of maternal virgins was compared with that of lactating dams observed on day 4 postpartum interacting with either suckling pups or pups unable to suckle due to perioral anesthesia. Ovariectomy had no effect on behavior of virgins. Retrieval and licking of pups were deficient in virgins compared with lactating dams. Suckled dams showed prolonged kyphosis (upright crouched nursing), whereas nonsuckled dams displayed little kyphosis but rather were often in a hunched position over pups. Some aspects of quiescent "nursing" behaviors of virgins were surprisingly similar to those of suckled dams, including the latency to and duration of quiescence. Nonsuckling pup stimulation elicited more kyphosis in virgins than in lactating dams, which was still much less than in suckled dams. Virgins also "nursed" pups in hunched and prone postures. Differences between sensitized and postpartum females in their maternal behaviors likely reflect differences in motivation as well as sensory inputs they receive from pups. In particular, sensory regulation of "nursing" behaviors is influenced by reproductive state because nonsuckling pups elicit different postural responses in sensitized and lactating mothers.     

Suppression of the prolactin surges in the pseudopregnant rat by urethane anesthesia

In pseudopregnancy of the rat prolactin (PRL) is released in the form of twice daily surges (nocturnal and diurnal surges). An attempt was made to examine the effects of urethane anesthesia on PRL surges during pseudopregnancy of the rat. In a preliminary study, using the continuous blood sampling method, the nocturnal PRL surge was completely blocked when urethane (1.0g/kg BW) was administered at 0:00 hr. Urethane (1.0g/kg BW) was injected at 0:00 or 12:00 hr, and serum and pituitary PRL concentrations were measured at 6:00 or 18:00 hr, respectively, to study the effects of urethane on nocturnal or diurnal PRL surges. There were no serum PRL surges during either the nocturnal or diurnal periods following urethane injection. The experiment examining pituitary PRL concentration at 6:00 or 18:00 hr confirmed that urethane (1.0g/kg) anesthesia suppressed the release of PRL surge from the pituitary.     

Extrahypothalamic control of daily surges of prolactin secretion in pseudopregnant rat

The role of the limbic forebrain structures in controlling twice daily surges of prolactin (PRL) induced by cervical stimulation was investigated after acute or chronic deafferentation of the limbic forebrain afferents to the hypothalamus in rats. The preoptic area-roof section (POA-RS), which interrupted the rostral limbic afferents at the dorsal level of the anterior commissure, induced pseudopregnancy (PSP) and initiated the same nocturnal PRL surges as those initiated by the cervical stimulation. Diurnal PRL surges, however, did not occur following this procedure. The nocturnal PRL surge by POA-RS also occurred in ovariectomized rats. Deafferentation between the diagonal band of Broca and the medial preoptic area (F2-cut) initiated PSP in 37 % of the rats and induced an apparent but small nocturnal PRL surge. The rats with POA-RS or F2-cut showed restoration of their regular estrous cyclicities. Cervical stimulation after POA-RS did not affect the initiation of nocturnal PRL surge induced by POA-RS alone. POA-RS after cervical stimulation also did not affect the initiation of nocturnal PRL surge induced by cervical stimulation, though a diurnal PRL surge was initiated in these rats. The cut made just before the diagonal band of Broca after cervical stimulation did not inhibit the occurrence of either surge. Nocturnal and diurnal PRL surges were manifested after cervical stimulation in the rats with chronic POA-RS or F2-cut and their vaginal cyclicities were resumed. These results suggest that the limbic forebrain structures are not indispensable for the initiation of nocturnal PRL surges induced by cervical stimulation but may modify the hypothalamic mechanism(s) initiating a nocturnal PRL surge through the rostral part of the hypothalamus.     

Nursing posture is elicited rapidly in maternally naive, haloperidol-treated female and male rats in response to ventral trunk stimulation from active pups

Maternal responsiveness in rats can be induced in virgin females and males, without hormonal priming, following several days of cohabitation with pups. Because antagonism of dopamine (DA) facilitates nursing behavior in lactating rats, the response of nonlactating, maternally naive rats to effective stimulation of the ventral trunk (ventrum) from pups following similar treatment was investigated. Lactating dams, virgin females and males, both intact and gonadectomized, were treated with a catalepsy-inducing dose of haloperidol (5 mg/kg), a DA receptor antagonist, and tested with hungry pups 1 hr later. Subjects were placed over 8 pups and postures assessed every 3 min for 30 min. The nursing posture occurred in most subjects. Lactating and nonlactating females were similar in occurrence of the nursing crouch, though the intensity was somewhat higher in the former; females scored higher than males in terms of likelihood and intensity of crouching; and there was no effect of gonadectomy. The nursing posture was not elicited in intact virgin females if the stimulus pups were anesthetized or if the subjects were treated with saline instead of haloperidol. There were no sex differences in onset or intensity of catalepsy in response to the dose of haloperidol used. These results suggest that the nursing posture occurs reflexively, is not directly dependent upon ovarian hormones, and is diminished by the effects of androgens, prior and current.     

Ontogenic studies of the neural control of adenohypophyseal hormones in the rat. II. prolactin

1. Serum prolactin levels are low during the first 20 days of life and gradually increase toward puberty, in both male and female rats. 2. There is an age-related increase in the cell population engaged in prolactin secretion, as well as an increase in the synthesis of prolactin and of the amount of prolactin secreted from individual lactotropes. 3. The gradual increase in prolactin levels in the third week of life is not related to a decrease in dopaminergic inhibition but to an increase in the efficiency of prolactin releasing factors such as estrogen, serotonin, opiates, and posterior pituitary extracts. 4. Prolactin release induced by physiological factors, such as stress, cervical stimulation, or the expression of spontaneous diurnal and nocturnal surges, requires maturational events within the hypothalamic-pituitary axis which are evident at the end of the third week of life. 5. In the female rat the steadily increasing levels of prolactin are involved in the timing of puberty eclosion acting at the ovary and at the brain. 6. In the prepubertal male rat increasing titers of prolactin may be involved in testicular and accessory organ development and may facilitate the actions of luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, and testosterone on male sexual organs.     

Pituitary prolactin concentrations associated with daily prolactin surges in pseudopregnant rats

During pseudopregnancy (PSP) two surges of prolactin (PRL) secretion from the pituitary are observed, the nocturnal surge at dawn and the diurnal surge in the evening. An attempt was made to clarify the correlation between changes in serum and pituitary PRL concentrations on day 5-6 of PSP. During the nocturnal surge, pituitary PRL concentration decreased significantly from 0000 hr to 0300-0600 hr. On the other hand, the high pituitary PRL concentration remained unchanged during the diurnal surge from 1200 hr to 1800 hr. These findings suggest that the nocturnal and diurnal PRL surges are regulated by separate controlling mechanisms.     

Proceedings: Neurohormonal control of prolactin release

Neurohomonal control of prolactin release was studied in pseudopregnant and pregnant rats. Nembutal administered at 1300 hours on Day 3 of pseudopregnancy prevented prolactin release which normally occurred at 1700 hours of the same day. Antiestrogen administered the day before did not prevent prolactin release but ovariectomy did. Estrogen administered immediately after ovariectomy did not restore prolactin secretion; however, progesterone on Day 3 in the ovariectomized-estrogen treated induced an increase in prolactin at 1700 hours. Progesterone was capable of increasing prolactin release the first 5 days of pseudopregnancy but not Days 6-12 when prolactin values were low. A similar effect was seen the first 7 days of pregnancy. Progesterone, but not estrogen, modified prolactin values on Day 9 at 1700 hours. Ovariectomy on Day 19 of pregnancy induced prolactin release within 4 hours and persisted for 58 hours. Progesterone administration immediately after ovariectomy prevented prolactin release for a few hours. These results suggest that the regulation of prolactin release by the central nervous system depends on the circulating estrogen/progesterone ratio, since estrogen facilitated prolactin release when plasma progesterone was low and progesterone induced prolactin release when adequated levels of estrogen existed, but exerted an inhibitory action when estrogen was not present.     

The physiology and mechanisms of the stress-induced changes in prolactin secretion in the rat

It is well known that stress in a number of forms induces the secretion of prolactin (PRL) in a number of species. What is not well known is that under certain conditions stress will also induce a decrease in PRL secretion. The conditions whereby stress decreases PRL are those where PRL secretion is elevated such as during the proestrous afternoon surge and during the nocturnal surge of pseudopregnancy. The physiologic significance of the stress-induced increase of PRL is suggested to be important in maintaining the competence of the immune system. The significance of the stress-induced decrease of PRL does not appear to have a major consequence on the physiology of reproduction in the rat and it is suggested that future studies be directed towards its significance in the immune system. The literature is reviewed dealing with the regulation of PRL secretion with emphasis on the factors that generate PRL surges in the rat. In addition the mechanism(s) of the stress-induced increase and decrease is (are) also examined. A hypothesis is presented suggesting an interaction between tuberoinfundibular dopamine secretion and a hypothalamic prolactin releasing factor in the generation of PRL surges and the differential effects of stress on PRL secretion.     

Restricted exposure of mice to primer pheromones coincident with prolactin surges blocks pregnancy by changing hypothalamic dopamine release

Exposure of recently mated female mice to strange male urine revealed that exposure for 8 h was sufficient to produce pregnancy block providing exposure is for two 4-h periods coincident with prolactin surges. Exposure for 8 h between prolactin surges or one 4-h exposure coincident with either the nocturnal or the diurnal prolactin surge was without effect. When bromocriptine, a dopamine agonist, was given coincident with the nocturnal and diurnal prolactin surges, it was equally effective, but the opiate antagonist (naltrexone) administered in a similar manner was without effect. This result indicates that pheromonal action is through excitation of the tuberoinfundibular neurones rather than by inhibition of beta-endorphin neurones. Further evidence for dopamine involvement in pregnancy block is demonstrated by showing DOPA accumulation in the medio-basal hypothalamus following exposure to male urinary pheromones after dihydroxybenzylhydrazine (DHBH) administration, which blocks the enzyme DOPA-decarboxylase. Taken together, this series of experiments provides convincing evidence for the dopamine inhibition of prolactin release being the final pathway for pheromone action in the context of pregnancy block.     

Mechanisms involved in the control of punished responding in mother rats

In a previous study we found that mother rats show more drinking responses than virgins in the punished drinking paradigm, an animal model for anxiety. The present investigation was carried out to determine the possible mechanisms underlying this naturally occurring anticonflict effect. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether the induction of maternal behavior in virgin females (by long-term estrogen and progestin treatment in combination with pup exposure) enhances punished drinking. However, no release from shock-induced (0.25 mA) suppression of drinking was observed in maternally responsive virgins deprived of water for 24 hr. Unlike natural mothers, then, no anticonflict effect is seen in maternal virgins. A considerable body of evidence suggests that facilitation of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) activity in the brain increases punished responding in rats. In the second experiment, therefore, lactating females were injected with pentylenetetrazol, a GABA antagonist, before being monitored for punished drinking. The drug attenuated the enhanced acceptance of shock in mothers, the effect being observed at a dose level that did not reliably affect unpunished responding. Experiment 3 addressed the possible influence of ovarian and adrenal hormones on punished drinking in lactating females. No significant behavioral effects were observed in mothers subjected to adrenalectomy or ovariectomy 4 days before testing.     

Oestrogen and progesterone interactions in the control of gonadotrophin and prolactin secretion

Oestrogen and progesterone have marked effects on the secretion of the gonadotrophins and prolactin. During most of the oestrous or menstrual cycle the secretion of gonadotrophin is maintained at a relatively low level by the negative feedback of oestrogen and progesterone on the hypothalamic-pituitary system. The spontaneous ovulatory surge of gonadotrophin is produced by a positive feedback cascade. The cascade is initiated by an increase in the plasma concentration of oestradiol-17 beta which triggers a surge of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) and an increase in pituitary responsiveness to LHRH. The facilitatory action of oestrogen on pituitary responsiveness is reinforced by progesterone and the priming effect of LHRH. How oestrogen and progesterone exert their effects is not clear but the facilitatory effects of oestrogen take about 24 h, and the stimulation of LHRH release is produced by an indirect effect of oestradiol on neurons which are possibly opioid, dopaminergic or noradrenergic and which modulate the activity of LHRH neurons. In the rat, a spontaneous prolactin surge occurs at the same time as the spontaneous ovulatory gonadotrophin surge. The prolactin surge also appears to involve a positive feedback between the brain-pituitary system and the ovary. However, the mechanism of the prolactin surge is poorly understood mainly because the neural control of prolactin release appears to be mediated by prolactin inhibiting as well as releasing factors, and the precise role of these factors has not been established. The control of prolactin release is further complicated by the fact that oestradiol stimulates prolactin synthesis and release by a direct action on the prolactotrophes. Prolactin and gonadotrophin surges also occur simultaneously in several experimental steroid models. A theoretical model is proposed which could explain how oestrogen and progesterone trigger the simultaneous surge of LH and prolactin.     

Development of progesterone dependency in the appearance of the nocturnal prolactin surge in immature rats

Basal concentrations of plasma prolactin in immature, Wistar-Imamichi strain rats at 25, 28 and 31 days of age were 5-12 ng/ml and no prolactin surges were observed in intact immature rats. Plasma progesterone values ranged from 5 to 9 ng/ml, while plasma oestradiol concentrations increased from 11 to 27 pg/ml between 25 and 31 days of age. When oestradiol was administered to ovariectomized 25- or 28-day-old rats by s.c. insertion of an implant, plasma prolactin concentrations at 05:00 and 12:00 h were similarly elevated 3 days after the operation. Oestradiol did not induce a nocturnal prolactin surge. The progesterone implants in ovariectomized rats at 28 days of age or on the first day of oestrus increased plasma prolactin values at 05:00 h. The magnitude of the progesterone-induced prolactin surge was greater when progesterone was given closer to the time of the first ovulation (about 34 days old). Pretreatment with oestradiol amplified the progesterone-induced prolactin surge. Mechanisms causing nocturnal prolactin surges are more sensitive to, and respond over a longer time period, to progesterone in pubertal rats than in adult animals. The results suggest that progesterone initiates the nocturnal surge of prolactin release and that oestradiol can amplify the effects of progesterone.     

Plasma gonadotropins and prolactin in pseudopregnancy in the rat

Radioimmunoassay presented a method of measuring plasma levels of FSH,LH and prolactin in pseudopregnant rats. Plasma prolactin levels doubled 15 minutes following cervical probing (p .01) on the day of estrus. Plasma LH levels were not significantly elevated. Due to the use of ether anesthesia at blood collecting 3 hr before and 15 minutes after stimulation, only 1 of 16 rats developed pseudopregnancy. On Day 4 of pseudopregnancy in rats mated with vasectomized males; plasma LH was lower (p .05) than in normal rats on the first day of diestrus, perhaps due to the suppressive action of ovarian progesterone and some estrogen. FSH was higher than in normal rats (p .05) perhaps due to the lesser sensitivity of FSH to the inhibitory effect of progesterone. Large decidoumata developed by Day 9 in uterine horns traumatized on Day 4 (153 plus or minus 8 mg uterus weight compared to 1510 plus or minus 204 mg). Thus, the corpora remain functional after LH and prolactin are at normal and subnormal levels. On Day 9 plasma prolactin was lower than at Day 1 of diestrus (p .001). Plasma FSH was elevated (p .01). Plasma LH was unchanged. The degree of rise of LH levels 5 days following ovariectomy on Day 4 of psuedopregnancy or on the first day of diestrus was greater in the former group (p .02), perhaps due to rebound of LH from suppression by ovarian steroids. FSH rose equally in both groups. Prolactin remain about the same. Increased prolactin release by the adenohypophysis was briefer than expected.     

Serum prolactin concentrations and the initiation of maternal behavior in the rat

Maternal behavior and serum prolactin were measured in pregnant and virgin female rats. Pregnant rats were either ovariectomized or shamovariectomized on Day 17 of pregnancy, while virgin females were ovariectomized at the same age. Two days after surgery nests were rated and the three treatment groups were tested for responsiveness to rat pups. Both pregnant treatment groups built superior nests compared to the virgin group and also responded more frequently to rat pups within a 1 hr test period than the virgin controls. In addition, significantly more ovariectomized pregnant subjects responded to pups than did intact pregnant females. Serum prolactin levels did not differ among the three treatments nor did exposure to pups affect serum prolactin levels. In each treatment group serum prolactin was less than 15 ng/ml, well below the 139.7 ng/ml mean found on Day 23 of pregnancy. These data suggest that high levels of serum prolactin during late pregnancy are not essential for the initiation of maternal behavior in the rat.     

The response of plasma prolactin to suckling during normal and prolonged lactation in the rat

In dams which had been kept isolated from pups for 8-10 h, the magnitude of the suckling-induced prolactin rise in the plasma was studied in relation to intensity of suckling stimulus and lactational age of the mother. At midlactation the response of prolactin evoked by suckling was enhanced as litter size increased. Suckling of 2 pups induced a greater prolactin rise in dams adjusted to 2 pups than in dams adjusted to 8 pups. Suckling of 8 pups caused a greater prolactin rise in dams which had been adjusted to an 8-pup litter, than in rats with a 2-pup litter. At late and prolonged lactation the rise of prolactin in the plasma induced by the suckling stimulus of 8 pups was significantly lower than at midlactation. Injection of perphenazine after a period of suckling induced a moderate increase of plasma prolactin in dams at midlactation, and a similar increase in dams at late lactation and at day 42 of lactation. It is concluded that in the first half of lactation the number of pups, i.e. the intensity of the suckling stimulus, is an important factor in determining the magnitude of the prolactin response to suckling. The lower response of plasma prolactin to suckling in late lactation is neither caused by a decrease in suckling stimulus from the pups nor by an increase in prolactin clearance; it is probably due to a gradual reduction in prolactin synthesizing and releasing capacity of the pituitary, brought on by a desensitization of the neural or neuroendocrine system to suckling stimuli as lactation proceeds.     

Effects of estradiol on the prolactin surges and the feedback mechanisms of gonadotropins in pseudopregnant rats

The influences of estradiol on the prolactin (PRL) surges and on the secretion of gonadotropins (LH and FSH) were investigated in the pseudopregnancy (PSP) of acutely ovariectomized rats. The four following experimental groups were prepared: 1) intact PSP as a control, 2) ovariectomy was performed on day 0 of PSP (OVX), 3) a Silastic tube containing estradiol was implanted for day 1-4 into the OVX rats (OVX-E 1-4), and 4) the Silastic tube was implanted for day 5-8 by the same manner into the OVX rats (OVX-E 5-8). In the OVX group nocturnal (N) PRL surges were observed at 0500 h on days 4, 8 and 12 examined, and increased secretions of LH and FSH were noted. In the OVX-E 1-4 group, the N PRL surge was suppressed on day 4, and the suppressed N PRL surge did not occur on day 8, after the removal of the implanted tubes. Diurnal (D) PRL surges with LH surges were observed at 1700 h on day 4 in these rats. Similarly, more remarkable results were obtained on days 8 and 12 in the OVX-E 5-8 group than in the OVX-E 1-4.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of immobilization stress on tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic (TIDA) neuronal activity and prolactin levels in lactating and non-lactating female rats.

The effects of immobilization stress on the prolactin secretory response and on the activity of the tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic (TIDA) neurons were determined in intact, virgin female rats on the morning of diestrus or proestrus and in post-partum, lactating female rats. The virgin females exhibited a significant increase in circulating levels of prolactin which was evident by 1 minute and persisted during the immobilization (5 minutes). In contrast, the prolactin secretory response in lactating females was significantly attenuated compared to non-lactating animals. The activity of the TIDA neurons was not altered by the 5 minutes of stress. Even after 30 minutes of immobilization, TIDA neuronal activity was not affected in either the lactating or cycling females. These data suggest that the cycling female rat is capable of a prolactin secretory response to the stressor without inhibition of TIDA neuronal activity. It seems likely that prolactin releasing factors mediate this response. In contrast, stress did not produce a similar prolactin increase during lactation. It seems likely that, during lactation, the pituitary is not sensitive to releasing factors unless the TIDA neurons are inhibited. There appear to be differences in the sensitivity of the pituitary depending on the physiological state of the model employed.     

Oxytocin inhibits infanticide in female house mice (Mus domesticus)

Between 60 and 90% of female house mice spontaneously kill unrelated young. A previous report indicated that subcutaneous administration of oxytocin significantly reduced the frequency of infanticide by virgin and pregnant females. However, in this study a distinction could not be made between an action of oxytocin on the CNS versus a secondary effect such as an enhanced release of prolactin by oxytocin. In the current experiment, oxytocin administered intracerebroventricularly was equally as effective at inhibiting infanticide as sc oxytocin. There was no difference in the effectiveness of oxytocin between groups of infanticidal females that were gonadally intact, ovariectomized, or estrogen treated. Pretreatment of infanticidal females with the prolactin inhibitors, bromocriptine and cysteamine, was also without effect on the ability of oxytocin to inhibit infanticide. Last, prolactin-inhibiting drugs had no significant effect on spontaneous parenting behavior by female mice. These data suggest that oxytocin acts directly on the CNS to alter behavior toward pups and that prolactin may not play a role in the maternal behavior of the house mouse.     

Current status of the rat prolactin releasing factor

The release of prolactin is governed by both inhibiting and releasing factors. Basal plasma concentration of prolactin is controlled mainly through inhibition by a prolactin release-inhibiting factor (PIF), while acute stimulation of prolactin release is believed to be caused by a prolactin-releasing factor (PRF). It is the general consensus that PIF is dopamine. The PRF plays an important role in stimulation of prolactin release, and there are promising putative PRFs.     

Effects of repeated pup exposure on behavioral,neural, and adrenocortical responses to pups in male California mice (Peromyscus californicus)

In biparental mammals, the factors facilitating the onset of male parental behavior are not well understood. While hormonal changes in fathers may play a role, prior experience with pups has also been implicated. We evaluated effects of prior exposure to pups on paternal responsiveness in the biparental California mouse (Peromyscus californicus). We analyzed behavioral, neural, and corticosterone responses to pups in adult virgin males that were interacting with a pup for the first time, adult virgin males that had been exposed to pups 3 times for 20 min each in the previous week, and new fathers. Control groups of virgins were similarly tested with a novel object (marble). Previous exposure to pups decreased virgins' latency to approach pups and initiate paternal care, and increased time spent in paternal care. Responses to pups did not differ between virgins with repeated exposure to pups and new fathers. In contrast, repeated exposure to a marble had no effects. Neither basal corticosterone levels nor corticosterone levels following acute pup or marble exposure differed among groups. Finally, Fos expression in the medial preoptic area, ventral and dorsal bed nucleus of the stria terminalis was higher following exposure to a pup than to a marble. Fos expression was not, however, affected by previous exposure to these stimuli. These results suggest that previous experience with pups can facilitate the onset of parental behavior in male California mice, similar to findings in female rodents, and that this effect is not associated with a general reduction in neophobia.