The decoupling of Smoothened from Galphai proteins has little effect on Gli3 protein processing and Hedgehog-regulated chick neural tube patterning

The Hedgehog (Hh) signal is transmitted by two receptor molecules, Patched (Ptc) and Smoothened (Smo). Ptc suppresses Smo activity, while Hh binds Ptc and alleviates the suppression, which results in activation of Hh targets. Smo is a seven-transmembrane protein with a long carboxyl terminal tail. Vertebrate Smo has been previously shown to be coupled to Gα_i proteins, but the biological significance of the coupling in Hh signal transduction is not clear. Here we show that although inhibition of Gα_i protein activity appears to significantly reduce Hh pathway activity in Ptc^−/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts and the NIH3T3-based Shh-light cells, it fails to derepress Shh- or a Smo-agonist-induced inhibition of Gli3 protein processing, a known in vivo indicator of Hh signaling activity. The inhibition of Gα_i protein activity also cannot block the Sonic Hedgehog (Shh)-dependent specification of neural progenitor cells in the neural tube. Consistent with these results, overexpression of a constitutively active Gα_i protein, Gα_i2QL, cannot ectopically specify the neural cell types in the spinal cord, whereas an active Smo, SmoM2, can. Thus, our results indicate that the Smo-induced Gα_i activity plays an insignificant role in the regulation of Gli3 processing and Shh-regulated neural tube patterning.     

Sonic Hedgehog-induced proliferation requires specific Gα inhibitory proteins

Proliferation of cerebellar granular neuronal precursors (CGNPs) is mediated by Sonic Hedgehog (Shh), which activates the Patched and Smoothened (Smo) receptor complex. Although its protein sequence suggests that Smo is a G protein coupled receptor (GPCR), the evidence that this receptor utilizes heterotrimeric G proteins as downstream effectors is controversial. In Drosophila, Gα(i) is required for Hedgehog (Hh) activity, but the involvement of heterotrimeric G proteins in vertebrate Shh signaling has not yet been established. Here, we show that Shh-induced proliferation of rat CGNPs is enhanced strongly by the expression of the active forms of Gα(i/o) proteins (Gα(i1), Gα(i2), Gα(i3), and Gα(o)) but not by members of another class (Gα(12)) of heterotrimeric G proteins. Additionally, the mRNAs of these different Gα(i) members display specific expression patterns in the developing cerebellum; only Gα(i2) and Gα(i3) are substantially expressed in the outer external granular layer, where CGNPs proliferate. Consistent with this, Shh-induced proliferation of CGNPs is reduced significantly by knockdowns of Gα(i2) and Gα(i3) but not by silencing of other members of the Gα(i/o) class. Finally, our results demonstrate that Gα(i2) and Gα(i3) locate to the primary cilium when expressed in CGNP cultures. In summary, we conclude that the proliferative effects of Shh on CGNPs are mediated by the combined activity of Gα(i2) and Gα(i3) proteins.     

Identification of critical residues in G(alpha)13 for stimulation of p115RhoGEF activity and the structure of the G(alpha)13-p115RhoGEF regulator of G protein signaling homology (RH) domain complex

RH-RhoGEFs are a family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors that contain a regulator of G protein signaling homology (RH) domain. The heterotrimeric G protein Gα(13) stimulates the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity of RH-RhoGEFs, leading to activation of RhoA. The mechanism by which Gα(13) stimulates the GEF activity of RH-RhoGEFs, such as p115RhoGEF, has not yet been fully elucidated. Here, specific residues in Gα(13) that mediate activation of p115RhoGEF are identified. Mutation of these residues significantly impairs binding of Gα(13) to p115RhoGEF as well as stimulation of GEF activity. These data suggest that the exchange activity of p115RhoGEF is stimulated allosterically by Gα(13) and not through its interaction with a secondary binding site. A crystal structure of Gα(13) bound to the RH domain of p115RhoGEF is also presented, which differs from a previously crystallized complex with a Gα(13)-Gα(i1) chimera. Taken together, these data provide new insight into the mechanism by which p115RhoGEF is activated by Gα(13).     

Identification of osteogenic purmorphamine derivatives

During embryonic and cancer development, the Hedgehog family of proteins, including Sonic Hedgehog, play an important role by relieving the inhibition of Smo by Ptc, thus activating the Smo signaling cascade. Recently, a purine compound, purmorphamine, has been reported to target the Hedgehog signaling pathway by interacting with Smo. Interestingly, both Sonic Hedgehog and purmorphamine were found to promote the osteogenic differentiation of mouse chondroprogenitor cells. However, there is insufficient information as to how the activation of this seemingly unrelated signaling pathway, either by Sonic Hedgehog or purmorphamine, contributes to osteogenesis. Using alkaline phosphatase assays, we screened 125 purmorphamine derivatives from the Korea Chemical Bank for effects on the differentiation of preosteoblast C2C12 cells. Here, we report that two purine derivatives modulate ALP activity as well as the expression of genes whose expression is known or suggested to be involved in osteogenesis.     

G13-dependent activation of MAPK by thyrotropin

Stimulation of the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) activates G proteins of all four subfamilies (G(s), G(i/o), G(q/11), and G(12/13)). Whereas G(s)/cAMP-dependent cellular responses upon TSHR stimulation are well established, other signaling pathways are less characterized. We evaluated TSH-elicited cellular responses in human follicular thyroid carcinoma cells stably expressing the TSHR and in primary, nonneoplastic human thyrocytes. In these cellular models, stimulation with TSH caused activation of p44/42 MAPK and subsequent induction of c-Fos. MAPK stimulation occurred independently of G(s), G(i/o), and G(q/11) signaling. Dominant negative constructs of G(12) or G(13) as well as shRNA-mediated suppression of Galpha(12) or Galpha(13) revealed that MAPK activation was dependent on G(13) but not on G(12) signaling. Furthermore, G(13)-dependent transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor was necessary for MAPK activation in follicular carcinoma cells, whereas EGFR was not involved in MAPK activation in nonneoplastic primary thyrocytes. The use of bacterial inhibitors of monomeric GTPases revealed that MAPK activation proceeded independently of Rho proteins but was clostridial toxin B-sensitive, suggesting involvement of Cdc42 or Rac. Thus, our data shed new light on cAMP-independent TSHR signaling and identify the first G(13)-dependent TSHR signaling pathway in human thyrocytes.