β-Arrestin 1 and 2 similarly influence μ-opioid receptor mobility and distinctly modulate adenylyl cyclase activity

β-Arrestins are known to play a crucial role in GPCR-mediated transmembrane signaling processes. However, there are still many unanswered questions, especially those concerning the presumed similarities and differences of β-arrestin isoforms. Here, we examined the roles of β-arrestin 1 and β-arrestin 2 at different levels of μ-opioid receptor (MOR)-regulated signaling, including MOR mobility, internalization of MORs, and adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity. For this purpose, naïve HEK293 cells or HEK293 cells stably expressing YFP-tagged MOR were transfected with appropriate siRNAs to block in a specific way the expression of β-arrestin 1 or β-arrestin 2. We did not find any significant differences in the ability of β-arrestin isoforms to influence the lateral mobility of MORs in the plasma membrane. Using FRAP and line-scan FCS, we observed that knockdown of both β-arrestins similarly increased MOR lateral mobility and diminished the ability of DAMGO and endomorphin-2, respectively, to enhance and slow down receptor diffusion kinetics. However, β-arrestin 1 and β-arrestin 2 diversely affected the process of agonist-induced MOR endocytosis and exhibited distinct modulatory effects on AC function. Knockdown of β-arrestin 1, in contrast to β-arrestin 2, more effectively suppressed forskolin-stimulated AC activity and prevented the ability of activated-MORs to inhibit the enzyme activity. Moreover, we have demonstrated for the first time that β-arrestin 1, and partially β-arrestin 2, may somehow interact with AC and that this interaction is strongly supported by the enzyme activation. These data provide new insights into the functioning of β-arrestin isoforms and their distinct roles in GPCR-mediated signaling.     

ADP-ribosylation factor-dependent phospholipase D2 activation is required for agonist-induced mu-opioid receptor endocytosis

Agonist exposure of many G protein-coupled receptors induces a rapid receptor phosphorylation and uncoupling from G proteins. Resensitization of these desensitized receptors requires endocytosis and subsequent dephosphorylation. Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, the rat mu-opioid receptor (MOR1, also termed MOP) was found to be associated with phospholipase D2 (PLD2), a phospholipid-specific phosphodiesterase located in the plasma membrane, which has been implicated in the formation of endocytotic vesicles. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments in HEK293 cells coexpressing MOR1 and PLD2 confirmed that MOR1 constitutively interacts with PLD2. Treatment with the mu receptor agonist DAMGO ([d-Ala(2), Me Phe(4), Glyol(5)]enkephalin) led to an increase in PLD2 activity, whereas morphine, which does not induce MOR1 receptor internalization, failed to induce PLD2 activation. The DAMGO-mediated PLD2 activation was inhibited by brefeldin A, an inhibitor of ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF) but not by the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor calphostin C indicating that opioid receptor-mediated activation of PLD2 is ARF- but not PKC-dependent. Furthermore, heterologous stimulation of PLD2 by phorbol ester led to an accelerated internalization of the mu-opioid receptor after both DAMGO and morphine exposure. Conversely the inhibition of PLD2-mediated phosphatidic acid formation by 1-butanol or overexpression of a negative mutant of PLD2 prevented agonist-mediated endocytosis of MOR1. Together, these data suggest that PLD2 play a key role in the regulation of agonist-induced endocytosis of the mu-opioid receptor.     

Modulating micro-opioid receptor phosphorylation switches agonist-dependent signaling as reflected in PKCepsilon activation and dendritic spine stability

A new role of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) phosphorylation was demonstrated in the current studies by using the μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1) as a model. Morphine induces a low level of receptor phosphorylation and uses the PKCε pathway to induce ERK phosphorylation and receptor desensitization, whereas etorphine, fentanyl, and [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) induce extensive receptor phosphorylation and use the β-arrestin2 pathway. Blocking OPRM1 phosphorylation (by mutating Ser363, Thr370 and Ser375 to Ala) enabled etorphine, fentanyl, and DAMGO to use the PKCε pathway. This was not due to the decreased recruitment of β-arrestin2 to the receptor signaling complex, because these agonists were unable to use the PKCε pathway when β-arrestin2 was absent. In addition, overexpressing G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) decreased the ability of morphine to activate PKCε, whereas overexpressing dominant-negative GRK2 enabled etorphine, fentanyl, and DAMGO to activate PKCε. Furthermore, by overexpressing wild-type OPRM1 and a phosphorylation-deficient mutant in primary cultures of hippocampal neurons, we demonstrated that receptor phosphorylation contributes to the differential effects of agonists on dendritic spine stability. Phosphorylation blockage made etorphine, fentanyl, and DAMGO function as morphine in the primary cultures. Therefore, agonist-dependent phosphorylation of GPCR regulates the activation of the PKC pathway and the subsequent responses.     

Involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinase in agonist-induced phosphorylation of the mu-opioid receptor in HEK 293 cells

Agonist exposure of many G protein-coupled receptors stimulates an activation of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases (ERKs) 1 and 2, members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family. Here, we show that treatment of human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells stably transfected to express the rat micro-opioid receptor (MOR1) with [D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly5-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) stimulated a rapid and transient (3-5-min) activation and nuclear translocation of MAPK. Exposure of these cells to the MAPK kinase 1 inhibitor PD98059 not only prevented MAPK activation but also inhibited homologous desensitization of the mu-opioid receptor. We have therefore determined the effect of PD98059 on agonist-induced mu-receptor phosphorylation. DAMGO stimulated a threefold increase in MOR1 phosphorylation within 20 min that could be reversed by the antagonist naloxone. PD98059 produced a dose-dependent inhibition of agonist-promoted mu-receptor phosphorylation with an IC50 of 20 microM. DAMGO also induced MOR1 internalization that peaked at 30 min. Confocal microscopy revealed that DAMGO-induced MOR1 internalization was also largely inhibited in the presence of PD98059. U0126, another chemically unrelated inhibitor of the MAPK cascade, mimicked the effect of PD98059 on mu-receptor phosphorylation and desensitization. MOR1 itself, however, appears to be a poor substrate for MAPK because mu-receptors immunoprecipitated from stably transfected HEK 293 cells were not phosphorylated by exogenous ERK 2 in vitro. The fact that morphine also triggered MAPK activation but did not induce MOR1 internalization indicates that receptor internalization was not required for MOR1-mediated mitogenic signaling. We conclude that MOR1 stimulates a rapid and intemalization-independent MAPK activation. Activation of the MAPK cascade in turn may not only relay mitogenic signals to the nucleus but also trigger initial events leading to phosphorylation and desensitization of the mu-opioid receptor.     

C-terminal splice variants of the mouse mu-opioid receptor differ in morphine-induced internalization and receptor resensitization

The main analgesic effects of the opioid alkaloid morphine are mediated by the mu-opioid receptor. In contrast to endogenous opioid peptides, morphine activates the mu-opioid receptor without causing its rapid endocytosis. Recently, three novel C-terminal splice variants (MOR1C, MOR1D, and MOR1E) of the mouse mu-opioid receptor (MOR1) have been identified. In the present study, we show that these receptors differ substantially in their agonist-selective membrane trafficking. MOR1 and MOR1C stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells exhibited phosphorylation, internalization, and down-regulation in the presence of the opioid peptide [d-Ala(2),Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) but not in response to morphine. In contrast, MOR1D and MOR1E exhibited robust phosphorylation, internalization, and down-regulation in response to both DAMGO and morphine. DAMGO elicited a similar desensitization (during an 8-h exposure) and resensitization (during a 50-min drug-free interval) of all four mu-receptor splice variants. After morphine treatment, however, MOR1 and MOR1C showed a faster desensitization and no resensitization as compared with MOR1D and MOR1E. These results strongly reinforce the hypothesis that receptor phosphorylation and internalization are required for opioid receptor reactivation thus counteracting agonist-induced desensitization. Our findings also suggest a mechanism by which cell- and tissue-specific C-terminal splicing of the mu-opioid receptor may significantly modulate the development of tolerance to the various effects of morphine.     

β-Arrestin2 directly or through GRK2 inhibits PKCβII activation in a ubiquitination-dependent manner

The GRK/β-arrestin and PKC/PKA mediate the homologous and heterologous regulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), respectively. Interaction between the two pathways is one of the most important issues in understanding the regulation of GPCRs. The present study investigated the regulatory effect of GRK2 and β-arrestins on PKC activation. The roles of GRK2 and β-arrestins in the functional regulation of PKC were assessed by determining their influence on PKC autophosphorylation and intracellular translocation. Radioligand binding assay was utilized to characterize intracellular trafficking of dopamine D₂R, D₃R, and β₂ adrenergic receptor (β₂AR). The subdomains involved in the mutual interactions among GRK2, β-arrestin2, and PKCβII were determined by in vitro binding assay. Various point mutants of key regulatory players were combined with knockdown cells of GRK2, β-arrestins, and Mdm2 to functionally correlate the biochemical changes with functional outcomes. GRK2 and β-arrestin2 mutually inhibited the PKCβII autophosphorylation, a hallmark of PKCβII activation. β-Arrestin2 ubiquitination was required for the inhibitory activities of GRK2 as well as β-arrestin2. Furthermore, GRK2 facilitated β-arrestin2 ubiquitination, thus to enhance the inhibitory actions of β-arrestin2 on PKCβII activity. Aforementioned processes were also involved in the GRK2/β-arrestin2-mediated inhibition of the D₂R, D₃R, and β₂AR endocytosis. The present study provides new insights into the intricate interactions between the homologous and heterologous GPCR regulation pathways. In addition, a novel regulatory role of GRK2 was proposed for the ubiquitination of β-arrestin in the context of the PKC-mediated heterologous regulation of GPCRs.     

Helix 8 plays a crucial role in bradykinin B(2) receptor trafficking and signaling

Upon activation the human bradykinin B(2) receptor (B(2)R) acts as guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the G proteins G(q/11) and G(i). Thereafter, it gets phosphorylated by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and recruits β-arrestins, which block further G protein activation and promote B(2)R internalization via clathrin-coated pits. As for most G protein-coupled receptors of family A, an intracellular helix 8 after transmembrane domain 7 is also predicted for the B(2)R. We show here that disruption of helix 8 in the B(2)R by either C-terminal truncation or just by mutation of a central amino acid (Lys-315) to a helix-breaking proline resulted in strong reduction of surface expression. Interestingly, this malfunction could be overcome by the addition of the membrane-permeable B(2)R antagonist JSM10292, suggesting that helix 8 has a general role for conformational stabilization that can be accounted for by an appropriate antagonist. Intriguingly, an intact helix 8, but not the C terminus with its phosphorylation sites, was indispensable for receptor sequestration and for interaction of the B(2)R with GRK2/3 and β-arrestin2 as shown by co-immunoprecipitation. Recruitment of β-arrestin1, however, required the presence of the C terminus. Taken together, our results demonstrate that helix 8 of the B(2)R plays a crucial role not only in efficient trafficking to the plasma membrane or the activation of G proteins but also for the interaction of the B(2)R with GRK2/3 and β-arrestins. Additional data obtained with chimera of B(2)R with other G protein-coupled receptors of family A suggest that helix 8 might have similar functions in other GPCRs as well.     

Structural determinants governing β-arrestin2 interaction with PDZ proteins and recruitment to CRFR1

β-Arrestins are multifunctional adaptor proteins best know for their vital role in regulating G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) trafficking and signaling. β-arrestin2 recruitment and receptor internalization of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 (CRFR1), a GPCR whose antagonists have been shown to demonstrate both anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects, have previously been shown to be modulated by PDZ proteins. Thus, a structural characterization of the interaction between β-arrestins and PDZ proteins can delineate potential mechanism of PDZ-dependent regulation of GPCR trafficking. Here, we find that the PDZ proteins PSD-95, MAGI1, and PDZK1 interact with β-arrestin2 in a PDZ domain-dependent manner. Further investigation of such interaction using mutational analyses revealed that mutating the alanine residue at 175 residue of β-arrestin2 to phenylalanine impairs interaction with PSD-95. Additionally, A175F mutant of β-arrestin2 shows decreased CRF-stimulated recruitment to CRFR1 and reduced receptor internalization. Thus, our findings show that the interaction between β-arrestins and PDZ proteins is key for CRFR1 trafficking and may be targeted to mitigate impaired CRFR1 signaling in mental and psychiatric disorders.     

Agonist mediated internalization of M2 mAChR is β-arrestin-dependent

Background

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) undergo agonist-promoted internalization, but evidence suggesting that the mechanism of internalization is β-arrestin dependent has been contradictory and unclear. Previous studies using heterologous over-expression of wild type or dominant-negative forms of β-arrestins have reported that agonist-promoted internalization of M₂ mAChRs is a β-arrestin- and clathrin-independent phenomenon. In order to circumvent the complications associated with the presence of endogenous β-arrestin that may have existed in these earlier studies, we examined agonist-promoted internalization of the M₂ mAChR in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from β-arrestin knockout mice that lack expression of either one or both isoforms of β-arrestin (β-arrestin 1 and 2).

Results

In wild type MEF cells transiently expressing M₂ mAChRs, 40% of surface M₂ mAChRs underwent internalization and sorted into intracellular compartments following agonist stimulation. In contrast, M₂ mAChRs failed to undergo internalization and sorting into intracellular compartments in MEF β-arrestin double knockout cells following agonist stimulation. In double knockout cells, expression of either β-arrestin 1 or 2 isoforms resulted in rescue of agonist-promoted internalization. Stimulation of M₂ mAChRs led to a stable co-localization with GFP-tagged β-arrestin within endocytic structures in multiple cell lines; the compartment to which β-arrestin localized was determined to be the early endosome. Agonist-promoted internalization of M₂ mAChRs was moderately rescued in MEF β-arrestin 1 and 2 double knockout cells expressing exogenous arrestin mutants that were selectively defective in interactions with clathrin (β-arrestin 2 ΔLIELD), AP-2 (β-arrestin 2-F391A), or both clathrin/AP-2. Expression of a truncated carboxy-terminal region of β-arrestin 1 (319–418) completely abrogated agonist-promoted internalization of M₂ mAChRs in wild type MEF cells.

Conclusion

In summary, this study demonstrates that agonist-promoted internalization of M₂ mAChRs is β-arrestin- and clathrin-dependent, and that the receptor stably co-localizes with β-arrestin in early endosomal vesicles.     

Phosphorylation of Ser363, Thr370, and Ser375 residues within the carboxyl tail differentially regulates mu-opioid receptor internalization

Prolonged activation of opioid receptors leads to their phosphorylation, desensitization, internalization, and down-regulation. To elucidate the relationship between mu-opioid receptor (MOR) phosphorylation and the regulation of receptor activity, a series of receptor mutants was constructed in which the 12 Ser/Thr residues of the COOH-terminal portion of the receptor were substituted to Ala, either individually or in combination. All these mutant constructs were stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells and exhibited similar expression levels and ligand binding properties. Among those 12 Ser/Thr residues, Ser(363), Thr(370), and Ser(375) have been identified as phosphorylation sites. In the absence of the agonist, a basal phosphorylation of Ser(363) and Thr(370) was observed, whereas [d-Ala(2),Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO)-induced receptor phosphorylation occurs at Thr(370) and Ser(375) residues. Furthermore, the role of these phosphorylation sites in regulating the internalization of MOR was investigated. The mutation of Ser(375) to Ala reduced the rate and extent of receptor internalization, whereas mutation of Ser(363) and Thr(370) to Ala accelerated MOR internalization kinetics. The present data show that the basal phosphorylation of MOR could play a role in modulating agonist-induced receptor internalization kinetics. Furthermore, even though mu-receptors and delta-opioid receptors have the same motif encompassing agonist-induced phosphorylation sites, the different agonist-induced internalization properties controlled by these sites suggest differential cellular regulation of these two receptor subtypes.     

Small ubiquitin-like modifier modification of arrestin-3 regulates receptor trafficking

Nonvisual arrestins are regulated by direct post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and nitrosylation. However, whether arrestins are regulated by other post-translational modifications remains unknown. Here we show that nonvisual arrestins are modified by small ubiquitin-like modifier 1 (SUMO-1) upon activation of β(2)-adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR). Lysine residues 295 and 400 in arrestin-3 fall within canonical SUMO consensus sites, and mutagenic analysis reveals that Lys-400 represents the main SUMOylation site. Depletion of the SUMO E2 modifying enzyme Ubc9 blocks arrestin-3 SUMOylation and attenuates β(2)AR internalization, suggesting that arrestin SUMOylation mediates G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis. Consistent with this, expression of a SUMO-deficient arrestin mutant failed to promote β(2)AR internalization as compared with wild-type arrestin-3. Our data reveal an unprecedented role for SUMOylation in mediating GPCR endocytosis and provide novel mechanistic insight into arrestin function and regulation.     

Role of phospholipase D2 in the agonist-induced and constitutive endocytosis of G-protein coupled receptors

We have recently shown that the mu-opioid receptor [MOR1, also termed mu-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor] is associated with the phospholipase D2 (PLD2), a phospholipid-specific phosphodiesterase located in the plasma membrane. We further demonstrated that, in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells co-expressing MOR1 and PLD2, treatment with (D-Ala2, Me Phe4, Glyol5)enkephalin (DAMGO) led to an increase in PLD2 activity and an induction of receptor endocytosis, whereas morphine, which does not induce opioid receptor endocytosis, failed to activate PLD2. In contrast, a C-terminal splice variant of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR1D, also termed MOP(1D)) exhibited robust endocytosis in response to both DAMGO and morphine treatment. We report here that MOR1D also mediates an agonist-independent (constitutive) PLD2-activation facilitating agonist-induced and constitutive receptor endocytosis. Inhibition of PLD2 activity by over-expression of a dominant negative PLD2 (nPLD2) blocked the constitutive PLD2 activation and impaired the endocytosis of MOR1D receptors. Moreover, we provide evidence that the endocytotic trafficking of the delta-opioid receptor [DOR, also termed delta-opioid peptide (DOP) receptor] and cannabinoid receptor isoform 1 (CB1) is also mediated by a PLD2-dependent pathway. These data indicate the generally important role for PLD2 in the regulation of agonist-dependent and agonist-independent G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) endocytosis.     

Agonist-Specific Regulation of δ-Opioid Receptor Trafficking by G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase and β-Arrestin

Abstract

Opioid receptors mediate multiple biological functions through their interaction with endogenous opioid peptides as well as opioid alkaloids including morphine and etorphine. Previously we have reported that the ability of distinct opioid agonists to differentially regulate μ-opioid receptor (μOR) responsiveness is related to their ability to promote G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)-dependent phosphorylation of the receptor (1). In the present study, we further examined the role of GRK and β-arrestin in agonist-specific regulation of the δ-opioid receptor (δOR). While both etorphine and morphine effectively activate the δOR, only etorphine triggers robust δOR phosphorylation followed by plasma membrane translocation of β-arrestin and receptor internalization. In contrast, morphine is unable to either elicit δOR phosphorylation or stimulate β-arrestin translocation, correlating with its inability to cause δOR internalization. Unlike for the μOR, overexpression of GRK2 results in neither the enhancement of δOR sequestration nor the rescue of δOR-mediated β-arrestin translocation. Therefore, our findings not only point to the existence of marked differences in the ability of different opioid agonists to promote δOR phosphorylation by GRK and binding to β-arrestin, but also demonstrate differences in the regulation of two opioid receptor subtypes. These observations may have important implications for our understanding of the distinct ability of various opioids in inducing opioid tolerance and addiction.     

Morphine induces terminal micro-opioid receptor desensitization by sustained phosphorylation of serine-375

Morphine is a poor inducer of micro-opioid receptor (MOR) internalization, but a potent inducer of cellular tolerance. Here we show that, in contrast to full agonists such as [D-Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO), morphine stimulated a selective phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal residue 375 (Ser(375)). Ser(375) phosphorylation was sufficient and required for morphine-induced desensitization of MOR. In the presence of full agonists, morphine revealed partial agonistic properties and potently inhibited MOR phosphorylation and internalization. Upon removal of the drug, DAMGO-desensitized receptors were rapidly dephosphorylated. In contrast, morphine-desensitized receptors remained at the plasma membrane in a Ser(375)-phosphorylated state for prolonged periods. Thus, morphine promotes terminal MOR desensitization by inducing a persistent modification of Ser(375).     

Src homology 2 (SH2) domain containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-1 (SHP-1) dephosphorylates VEGF Receptor-2 and attenuates endothelial DNA synthesis, but not migration*

Background

Sustained agonist-promoted ubiquitination of β-arrestin has been correlated with increased stability of the GPCR – β-arrestin complex. Moreover, abrogation of β-arrestin ubiquitination has been reported to inhibit receptor internalization with minimal effects on receptor degradation.

Results

Herein we report that agonist activation of M₁ mAChRs produces a sustained β-arrestin ubiquitination but no stable co-localization with β-arrestin. In contrast, sustained ubiquitination of β-arrestin by activation of M₂ mAChRs does result in stable co-localization between the M₂ mAChR and β-arrestin. Internalization of receptors was unaffected by proteasome inhibitors, but down-regulation was significantly reduced, suggesting a role for the ubiquitination machinery in promoting down-regulation of the receptors. Given the ubiquitination status of β-arrestin following agonist treatment, we sought to determine the effects of β-arrestin ubiquitination on M₁ and M₂ mAChR down-regulation. A constitutively ubiquitinated β-arrestin 2 chimera in which ubiquitin is fused to the C-terminus of β-arrestin 2 (YFP-β-arrestin 2-Ub) significantly increased agonist-promoted down-regulation of both M₁ and M₂ mAChRs, with the effect substantially higher on the M₂ mAChR. Based on this observation, we were interested in examining the effects of disruption of potential ubiquitination sites in the β-arrestin sequence on receptor down-regulation. Agonist-promoted internalization of the M₂ mAChR was not affected by expression of β-arrestin lysine mutants lacking putative ubiquitination sites, β-arrestin 2^{K18R, K107R, K108R, K207R, K296R}, while down-regulation and stable co-localiztion of the receptor with this β-arrestin lysine mutant were significantly reduced. Interestingly, expression of β-arrestin 2^{K18R, K107R, K108R, K207R, K296R} increased the agonist-promoted down-regulation of the M₁ mAChR but did not result in a stable co-localiztion of the receptor with this β-arrestin lysine mutant.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that ubiquitination of β-arrestin has a distinct role in the differential trafficking and degradation of M₁ and M₂ mAChRs.     

Regulation of membrane cholecystokinin-2 receptor by agonists enables classification of partial agonists as biased agonists

Given the importance of G-protein-coupled receptors as pharmacological targets in medicine, efforts directed at understanding the molecular mechanism by which pharmacological compounds regulate their presence at the cell surface is of paramount importance. In this context, using confocal microscopy and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, we have investigated internalization and intracellular trafficking of the cholecystokinin-2 receptor (CCK2R) in response to both natural and synthetic ligands with different pharmacological features. We found that CCK and gastrin, which are full agonists on CCK2R-induced inositol phosphate production, rapidly and abundantly stimulate internalization. Internalized CCK2R did not rapidly recycle to plasma membrane but instead was directed to late endosomes/lysosomes. CCK2R endocytosis involves clathrin-coated pits and dynamin and high affinity and prolonged binding of β-arrestin1 or -2. Partial agonists and antagonists on CCK2R-induced inositol phosphate formation and ERK1/2 phosphorylation did not stimulate CCK2R internalization or β-arrestin recruitment to the CCK2R but blocked full agonist-induced internalization and β-arrestin recruitment. The extreme C-terminal region of the CCK2R (and more precisely phosphorylatable residues Ser(437)-Xaa(438)-Thr(439)-Thr(440)-Xaa(441)-Ser(442)-Thr(443)) were critical for β-arrestin recruitment. However, this region and β-arrestins were dispensable for CCK2R internalization. In conclusion, this study allowed us to classify the human CCK2R as a member of class B G-protein-coupled receptors with regard to its endocytosis features and identified biased agonists of the CCK2R. These new important insights will allow us to investigate the role of internalized CCK2R·β-arrestin complexes in cancers expressing this receptor and to develop new diagnosis and therapeutic strategies targeting this receptor.     

RGS14 prevents morphine from internalizing Mu-opioid receptors in periaqueductal gray neurons

Opioid agonists display different capacities to stimulate mu-opioid receptor (MOR) endocytosis, which is related to their ability to provoke the phosphorylation of specific cytosolic residues in the MORs. Generally, opioids that efficiently promote MOR endocytosis and recycling produce little tolerance, as is the case for [d-Ala², N-MePhe⁴,Gly-ol⁵] encephalin (DAMGO). However, morphine produces rapid and profound antinociceptive desensitization in the adult mouse brain associated with little MOR internalization. The regulator of G-protein signaling, the RGS14 protein, associates with MORs in periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) neurons, and when RGS14 is silenced morphine increased the serine 375 phosphorylation in the C terminus of the MOR, a GRK substrate. Subsequently, these receptors were internalized and recycled back to the membrane where they accumulated on cessation of antinociception. These mice now exhibited a resensitized response to morphine and little tolerance developed. Thus, in morphine-activated MORs the RGS14 prevents GRKs from phosphorylating those residues required for β-arresting-mediated endocytosis. Moreover morphine but not DAMGO triggered a process involving calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) in naïve mice, which contributes to MOR desensitization in the plasma membrane. In RGS14 knockdown mice morphine failed to activate this kinase. It therefore appears that phosphorylation and internalization of MORs disrupts the CaMKII-mediated negative regulation of these opioid receptors.     

The beta-arrestin pathway-selective type 1A angiotensin receptor (AT1A) agonist [Sar1,Ile4,Ile8]angiotensin II regulates a robust G protein-independent signaling network

The angiotensin II peptide analog [Sar(1),Ile(4),Ile(8)]AngII (SII) is a biased AT(1A) receptor agonist that stimulates receptor phosphorylation, β-arrestin recruitment, receptor internalization, and β-arrestin-dependent ERK1/2 activation without activating heterotrimeric G-proteins. To determine the scope of G-protein-independent AT(1A) receptor signaling, we performed a gel-based phosphoproteomic analysis of AngII and SII-induced signaling in HEK cells stably expressing AT(1A) receptors. A total of 34 differentially phosphorylated proteins were detected, of which 16 were unique to SII and eight to AngII stimulation. MALDI-TOF/TOF mass fingerprinting was employed to identify 24 SII-sensitive phosphoprotein spots, of which three (two peptide inhibitors of protein phosphatase 2A (I1PP2A and I2PP2A) and prostaglandin E synthase 3 (PGES3)) were selected for validation and further study. We found that phosphorylation of I2PP2A was associated with rapid and transient inhibition of a β-arrestin 2-associated pool of protein phosphatase 2A, leading to activation of Akt and increased phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase 3β in an arrestin signalsome complex. SII-stimulated PGES3 phosphorylation coincided with an increase in β-arrestin 1-associated PGES3 and an arrestin-dependent increase in cyclooxygenase 1-dependent prostaglandin E(2) synthesis. These findings suggest that AT(1A) receptors regulate a robust G protein-independent signaling network that affects protein phosphorylation and autocrine/paracrine prostaglandin production and that these pathways can be selectively modulated by biased ligands that antagonize G protein activation.     

Fast modulation of μ-opioid receptor (MOR) recycling is mediated by receptor agonists

The μ-opioid receptor (MOR) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family and the main target of endogenous opioid neuropeptides and morphine. Upon activation by ligands, MORs are rapidly internalized via clathrin-coated pits in heterologous cells and dissociated striatal neurons. After initial endocytosis, resensitized receptors recycle back to the cell surface by vesicular delivery for subsequent cycles of activation. MOR trafficking has been linked to opioid tolerance after acute exposure to agonist, but it is also involved in the resensitization process. Several studies describe the regulation and mechanism of MOR endocytosis, but little is known about the recycling of resensitized receptors to the cell surface. To study this process, we induced internalization of MOR with [D-Ala(2), N-Me-Phe(4), Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) and morphine and imaged in real time single vesicles recycling receptors to the cell surface. We determined single vesicle recycling kinetics and the number of receptors contained in them. Then we demonstrated that rapid vesicular delivery of recycling MORs to the cell surface was mediated by the actin-microtubule cytoskeleton. Recycling was also dependent on Rab4, Rab11, and the Ca(2+)-sensitive motor protein myosin Vb. Finally, we showed that recycling is acutely modulated by the presence of agonists and the levels of cAMP. Our work identifies a novel trafficking mechanism that increases the number of cell surface MORs during acute agonist exposure, effectively reducing the development of opioid tolerance.     

Multiple scaffolding functions of {beta}-arrestins in the degradation of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2

G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) plays a fundamental role in the regulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and changes in GRK2 expression levels can have an important impact on cell functions. GRK2 is known to be degraded by the proteasome pathway. We have shown previously that β-arrestins participate in enhanced kinase turnover upon GPCR stimulation by facilitating GRK2 phosphorylation by c-Src or by MAPK or by recruiting the Mdm2 E3 ubiquitin ligase to the receptor complex. In this report, we have investigated how such diverse β-arrestin scaffold functions are integrated to modulate GRK2 degradation. Interestingly, we found that in the absence of GPCR activation, β-arrestins do not perform an adaptor role for GRK2/Mdm2 association, but rather compete with GRK2 for direct Mdm2 binding to regulate basal kinase turnover. Upon agonist stimulation, β-arrestins-mediated phosphorylation of GRK2 at serine 670 by MAPK facilitates Mdm2-mediated GRK2 degradation, whereas c-Src-dependent phosphorylation would support the action of an undetermined β-arrestin-recruited ligase in the absence of GPCR activation. The ability of β-arrestins to play different scaffold functions would allow coordination of both Mdm2-dependent and -independent processes aimed at the specific modulation of GRK2 turnover in different signaling contexts.