Quantitative Real-Time Legionella PCR for Environmental Water Samples: Data Interpretation

Quantitative Legionella PCRs targeting the 16S rRNA gene (specific for the genus Legionella) and the mip gene (specific for the species Legionella pneumophila) were applied to a total of 223 hot water system samples (131 in one laboratory and 92 in another laboratory) and 37 cooling tower samples (all in the same laboratory). The PCR results were compared with those of conventional culture. 16S rRNA gene PCR results were nonquantifiable for 2.8% of cooling tower samples and up to 39.1% of hot water system samples, and this was highly predictive of Legionella CFU counts below 250/liter. PCR cutoff values for identifying hot water system samples containing >10³ CFU/liter legionellae were determined separately in each laboratory. The cutoffs differed widely between the laboratories and had sensitivities from 87.7 to 92.9% and specificities from 77.3 to 96.5%. The best specificity was obtained with mip PCR. PCR cutoffs could not be determined for cooling tower samples, as the results were highly variable and often high for culture-negative samples. Thus, quantitative Legionella PCR appears to be applicable to samples from hot water systems, but the positivity cutoff has to be determined in each laboratory.     

Usefulness of real-time PCR as a complementary tool to the monitoring of Legionella spp. and Legionella pneumophila by culture in industrial cooling systems

Aims: This study was designed to evaluate the usefulness of quantification by real‐time PCR as a management tool to monitor concentrations of Legionella spp. and Legionella pneumophila in industrial cooling systems and its ability to anticipate culture trends by the French standard method (AFNOR T90‐431). Methods and Results: Quantifications of Legionella bacteria were achieved by both methods on samples from nine cooling systems with different water qualities. Proportion of positive samples for L. pneumophila quantified by PCR was clearly lower in deionized or river waters submitted to a biocide treatment than in raw river waters, while positive samples for Legionella spp. were quantified for almost all the samples. For some samples containing PCR inhibitors, high quantification limits (up to 4·80 × 10⁵ GU l^?1) did not allow us to quantify L. pneumophila, when they were quantified by culture. Finally, the monitoring of concentrations of L. pneumophila by both methods showed similar trends for 57–100% of the samples. Conclusions: These results suggest that, if some methodological steps designed to reduce inhibitory problems and thus decrease the quantification limits, could be developed to quantify Legionella in complex waters, the real‐time PCR could be a valuable complementary tool to monitor the evolution of L. pneumophila concentrations. Significance and Impact of the Study: This study shows the possibility of using real‐time PCR to monitor L. pneumophila proliferations in cooling systems and the importance to adapt nucleic acid extraction and purification protocols to raw waters.     

Integrated Real-Time PCR for Detection and Monitoring of Legionella pneumophila in Water Systems

We evaluated a ready-to-use real-time quantitative Legionella pneumophila PCR assay system by testing 136 hot-water-system samples collected from 55 sites as well as 49 cooling tower samples collected from 20 different sites, in parallel with the standard culture method. The PCR assay was reproducible and suitable for routine quantification of L. pneumophila. An acceptable correlation between PCR and culture results was obtained for sanitary hot-water samples but not for cooling tower samples. We also monitored the same L. pneumophila-contaminated cooling tower for 13 months by analyzing 104 serial samples. The culture and PCR results were extremely variable over time, but the curves were similar. The differences between the PCR and culture results did not change over time and were not affected by regular biocide treatment. This ready-to-use PCR assay for L. pneumophila quantification could permit more timely disinfection of cooling towers.     

Detection of culturable and nonculturable Legionella species from hot water systems of public buildings in Japan

Aims: To investigate the prevalence of culturable and nonculturable Legionella species in hot water systems of public buildings in Japan and assess the risk factors associated with Legionella contamination in hot water systems. Methods and Results: Legionella species were detected by conventional culture and molecular methods in 130 water samples collected from 40 buildings. A total of 26 (20·0%) water samples from 17 (42·5%) buildings were positive by culture, qualitative PCR or both methods: Legionella pneumophila and Leg. anisa were detected in four samples by a culture method, whereas 23 samples were positive by qualitative PCR, with the presence of various Legionella species confirmed by sequencing. Of these 23 samples, bacterial counts were quantifiable in 21 by real‐time PCR (from 1·7 × 10⁵ to 2·6 × 10¹¹ cells per litre). Phylogenetic analysis of amplified partial 16S rRNA gene showed close relations to various species of Legionella, including Leg. anisa and Leg. micdadei, all of which have been associated with respiratory diseases or increased antibody titres in human sera. Assessment of risk factors showed that turbidity, free chlorine concentration, iron concentration and heterotrophic plate count (HPC) were significantly associated with Legionella contamination (P < 0·05). Conclusions: Contamination of hot water systems of public buildings with culturable and nonculturable Legionella species may be a potential risk factor for Legionella infection in Japan. Adequate levels of chlorine, low levels of iron and HPC are important maintenance measures in the reduction of Legionella contamination in hot water systems. Significance and Impact of the Study: More than 40% of hot water systems in the Japanese public buildings examined were contaminated by not only culturable Leg. pneumophila and Leg. anisa but also by nonculturable pathogenic species. To our knowledge, this is the first report of both culturable and nonculturable Legionella contamination in hot water systems of public buildings in Japan.     

Legionnaires' disease outbreaks and cooling towers with amplifiedLegionella concentrations

This study was designed to investigate the possible association of high colony counts of legionellae from cooling towers and evaporative condensers with Legionnaires' disease outbreaks. We obtained legionellae counts from samples of cooling towers and evaporative condensers that were the likely sources of two different Legionnaires' disease outbreaks and compared these counts with those from cooling towers that were not associated with reports of human disease. Among 675 potential control cooling tower that were samples from 258 facilities, 136 facilities had one or more cooling towers that met our criteria for inclusion into the study. Samples taken from buildings where an outbreak had occurred had much higherLegionella counts than did samples from other buildings. Colony counts from the two outbreak-associated facilities were significantly higher than colony counts from other facilities [Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test (Exact), p<0.01]. The results of the study suggest that, among cooling towers that test positive for the presence of legionellae, higher colony counts are associated with higher risk of Legionnaires' disease.     

Application of EMA-qPCR as a complementary tool for the detection and monitoring of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Legionella</Emphasis> in different water systems

Legionella are prevalent in human-made water systems and cause legionellosis in humans. Conventional culturing and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques are not sufficiently accurate for the quantitative analysis of live Legionella bacteria in water samples because of the presence of viable but nonculturable cells and dead cells. Here, we report a rapid detection method for viable Legionella that combines ethidium monoazide (EMA) with quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and apply this method to detect Legionella in a large number of water samples from different sources. Results yielded that samples treated with 5 μg/ml EMA for 10 min and subsequently exposed to light irradiation for 5 min were optimal for detecting Legionella. EMA treatment before qPCR could block the signal from approximately 4 log₁₀ of dead cells. When investigating environmental water samples, the percent-positive rate obtained by EMA-qPCR was significantly higher than conventional PCR and culture methods, and slightly lower than qPCR. The bacterial count of Legionella determined by EMA-qPCR were mostly greater than those determined by culture assays and lower than those determined by qPCR. Acceptable correlations were found between the EMA-qPCR and qPCR results for cooling towers, piped water and hot spring water samples (r = 0.849, P < 0.001) and also found between the EMA-qPCR and culture results for hot spring water samples (r = 0.698, P < 0.001). The results indicate that EMA-qPCR could be used as a complementary tool for the detection and monitoring of Legionella in water systems, especially in hot spring water samples.     

Development of a new CARD-FISH protocol for quantification of Legionella pneumophila and its application in two hospital cooling towers

Aims: Open cooling towers are frequent sources of infections with Legionella pneumophila. The gold standard for the detection of Leg. pneumophila is based on cultivation lasting up to 10 days and detecting only culturable cells. Alternative fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) protocols have been proposed, but they result in faint fluorescence signals and lack specificity because of cross‐hybridization with other Legionella species. Our aim was thus to develop a new FISH protocol for rapid and specific detection of Leg. pneumophila in water samples. Methods and Results: A novel catalysed reporter deposition FISH (CARD‐FISH) protocol for the detection of Leg. pneumophila was developed, which significantly enhanced signal intensity as well as specificity of the probe through the use of a novel competitor probe. The developed protocol was compared with the culture method for monitoring the seasonal development of culturable and nonculturable Leg. pneumophila in two hospital cooling tower systems. Seasonal fluctuations of Leg. pneumophila concentrations detected via CARD‐FISH were related to the development of the total bacterial community in both cooling towers, with temperature and biocide as the main factors controlling this development. Conclusions: Our results clearly showed that the majority of the Leg. pneumophila cells were in a nonculturable state. Thus, detection of Leg. pneumophila with culture methods may underestimate the total numbers of Leg. pneumophila present. Significance and Impact of the Study: Rapid, sensitive and specific detection and quantification of Leg. pneumophila in water systems is prerequisite for reliable risk estimation. The new protocol significantly improves current methodology and can be used to monitor and screen for Leg. pneumophila concentrations in cooling towers or other water systems.     

Rapid Method for Enumeration of Viable Legionella pneumophila and Other Legionella spp. in Water

A sensitive and specific method has been developed to enumerate viable L. pneumophila and other Legionella spp. in water by epifluorescence microscopy in a short period of time (a few hours). This method allows the quantification of L. pneumophila or other Legionella spp. as well as the discrimination between viable and nonviable Legionella. It simultaneously combines the specific detection of Legionella cells using antibodies and a bacterial viability marker (ChemChrome V6), the enumeration being achieved by epifluorescence microscopy. The performance of this immunological double-staining (IDS) method was investigated in 38 natural filterable water samples from different aquatic sources, and the viable Legionella counts were compared with those obtained by the standard culture method. The recovery rate of the IDS method is similar to, or higher than, that of the conventional culture method. Under our experimental conditions, the limit of detection of the IDS method was <176 Legionella cells per liter. The examination of several samples in duplicates for the presence of L. pneumophila and other Legionella spp. indicated that the IDS method exhibits an excellent intralaboratory reproducibility, better than that of the standard culture method. This immunological approach allows rapid measurements in emergency situations, such as monitoring the efficacy of disinfection shock treatments. Although its field of application is as yet limited to filterable waters, the double-staining method may be an interesting alternative (not equivalent) to the conventional standard culture methods for enumerating viable Legionella when rapid detection is required.     

Legionella in industrial cooling towers: monitoring and control strategies

Aims: Legionella contamination of industrial cooling towers has been identified as the cause of sporadic cases and outbreaks of legionellosis among people living nearby. To evaluate and control Legionella contamination in industrial cooling tower water, microbiological monitoring was carried out to determine the effectiveness of the following different disinfection treatments: (i) continuous chlorine concentration of 0·01 ppm and monthly chlorine shock dosing (5 ppm) on a single cooling tower; (ii) continuous chlorine concentration of 0·4 ppm and monthly shock of biocide P3 FERROCID 8580 (BKG Water Solution) on seven towers. Methods and Results: Legionella spp. and total bacterial count (TBC) were determined 3 days before and after each shock dose. Both strategies demonstrated that when chlorine was maintained at low levels, the Legionella count grew to levels above 10⁴ CFU l^?1 while TBC still remained above 10⁸ CFU l^?1. Chlorine shock dosing was able to eliminate bacterial contamination, but only for 10–15 days. Biocide shock dosing was also insufficient to control the problem when the disinfectant concentration was administered at only one point in the plant and at the concentration of 30 ppm. On the other hand, when at a biocide concentration of 30 or 50 ppm was distributed throughout a number of points, depending on the plant hydrodynamics, Legionella counts decreased significantly and often remained below the warning limit. Moreover, the contamination of water entering the plant and the presence of sediment were also important factors for Legionella growth. Conclusions: For effective decontamination of outdoor industrial cooling towers, disinfectants should be distributed in a targeted way, taking into account the possible sources of contamination. Significance and Impact of the Study: The data of the research permitted to modify the procedure of disinfection for better reduce the water and aerosol contamination and consequently the exposure risk.     

An international trial of quantitative PCR for monitoring Legionella in artificial water systems

Aims: To perform an international trial to derive alert and action levels for the use of quantitative PCR (qPCR) in the monitoring of Legionella to determine the effectiveness of control measures against legionellae. Methods and Results: Laboratories (7) participated from six countries. Legionellae were determined by culture and qPCR methods with comparable detection limits. Systems were monitored over ≥10 weeks. For cooling towers (232 samples), there was a significant difference between the log mean difference between qPCR (GU l^?1) and culture (CFU l^?1) for Legionella pneumophila (0·71) and for Legionella spp. (2·03). In hot and cold water (506 samples), the differences were less, 0·62 for Leg. pneumophila and 1·05 for Legionella spp. Results for individual systems depended on the nature of the system and its treatment. In cooling towers, Legionella spp. GU l^?1 always exceeded CFU l^?1, and usually Legionella spp. were detected by qPCR when absent by culture. The pattern of results by qPCR for Leg. pneumophila followed the culture trend. In hot and cold water, culture and qPCR gave similar results, particularly for Leg. pneumophila. There were some marked exceptions with temperatures ≥50°C, or in the presence of supplementary biocides. Action and alert levels for qPCR were derived that gave results comparable to the application of the European Guidelines based on culture. Algorithms are proposed for the use of qPCR for routine monitoring. Conclusions: Action and alert levels for qPCR can be adjusted to ensure public health is protected with the benefit that remedial actions can be validated earlier with only a small increase in the frequency of action being required. Significance and Impact of the Study: This study confirms it is possible to derive guidelines on the use of qPCR for monitoring the control of legionellae with consequent improvement to response and public health protection.     

Rapid quantification of viable legionellae in water and biofilm using ethidium monoazide coupled with real‐time quantitative PCR

Aims: To optimize ethidium monoazide (EMA) coupled with real‐time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and to evaluate its environmental applicability on quantifying viable legionellae in water and biofilm of cooling towers and hot water systems. Methods and Results: EMA (0·9–45·5 μg ml^?1) and propidium monoazide (PMA, 0·9 and 2·3 μg ml^?1) combined with qPCR (i.e. EMA‐qPCR and PMA‐qPCR, respectively) were applied to unheated and heated (70°C for 30 min) Legionella pneumophila to quantify viable cells, which was also simultaneously determined by BacLight Bacterial Viability kit with epifluorogenic microscopic enumeration (BacLight‐EM). The effects of nontarget microflora and sample matrix on the performance of EMA‐qPCR were also evaluated. In comparison with BacLight‐EM results, qPCR with EMA at 2·3 μg ml^?1 was determined as the optimal EMA‐qPCR assay, which performed equally well as PMA‐qPCR for unheated Leg. pneumophila but better than PMA‐qPCR for heated Leg. pneumophila (P < 0·05). Moreover, qPCR with EMA at 2·3 μg ml^?1 accurately quantified viable Leg. pneumophila, Legionella anisa and Legionella‐like amoebal pathogens 6 (LLAP 6) without interferences by heated legionellae, unheated nonlegionellae cells and cooling tower water matrix (P > 0·05). As for water and biofilm samples collected from cooling towers and hot water systems, the viable legionellae counts determined by EMA‐qPCR were mostly greater than the culturable counts by culture assay but consistently lower than the total cell counts quantified by qPCR. Conclusions: The qPCR with EMA at 2·3 μg ml^?1 may accurately quantify viable legionellae (including fastidious LLAP 6) and Leg. pneumophila pretreated with superheating and is applicable for water and biofilm samples obtained from cooling towers and hot water systems. Significance and Impact of the Study: The EMA‐qPCR assay may be useful in environmental surveillance for viable legionellae and in evaluation of superheating efficacy against legionellae.     

Integrated real-time PCR for detection and monitoring of Legionella pneumophila in water systems

We evaluated a ready-to-use real-time quantitative Legionella pneumophila PCR assay system by testing 136 hot-water-system samples collected from 55 sites as well as 49 cooling tower samples collected from 20 different sites, in parallel with the standard culture method. The PCR assay was reproducible and suitable for routine quantification of L. pneumophila. An acceptable correlation between PCR and culture results was obtained for sanitary hot-water samples but not for cooling tower samples. We also monitored the same L. pneumophila-contaminated cooling tower for 13 months by analyzing 104 serial samples. The culture and PCR results were extremely variable over time, but the curves were similar. The differences between the PCR and culture results did not change over time and were not affected by regular biocide treatment. This ready-to-use PCR assay for L. pneumophila quantification could permit more timely disinfection of cooling towers.     

Isolation of Legionella pneumophila from Cooling Tower Water by Filtration

Methods are described for detection of Legionella pneumophila in cooling tower water or other water sources by direct fluorescent-antibody staining. A procedure for isolation of Legionella bacteria from water samples by guinea pig inoculation is described. Two different serogroups of L. pneumophila were isolated repeatedly from one of the cooling towers.     

Automated dead-end ultrafiltration of large volume water samples to enable detection of low-level targets and reduce sample variability

Aims

A Portable Multi‐use Automated Concentration System (PMACS) concentrates micro‐organisms from large volumes of water through automated dead‐end ultrafiltration and backflushing. The ability to detect microbial targets from ground, surface and cooling tower waters collected using standard methods was compared with samples from the PMACS in this study.

Methods and Results

PMACS (100 l) and standard grab samples (100–500 ml) were collected from sites in Florida and South Carolina, USA. Samples were analysed for the presence of faecal indicator bacteria (FIB; ground and surface water) or Legionella pneumophila (Lp; cooling tower water). FIB were enumerated by growth on selective media following membrane filtration or in IDEXX defined substrate media. Lp cells were detected by direct fluorescence immunoassay using FITC‐labelled monoclonal antibodies targeting serogroups 1, 2, 4 and 6. FIB were found in PMACS samples from ground and surface waters when their concentrations were below detection limits in grab samples. The concentrations of Lp in cooling tower samples collected over 5 months were more consistent in PMACS samples than grab samples.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate that PMACS concentration is advantageous for water monitoring. FIB were detected in PMACS samples when their concentrations were below the detection limits of the standard methods used. PMACS processing provided more representative samples of cooling tower waters reducing sample variability during long‐term monitoring.

Significance and Impact of the Study

This study highlights the utility of PMACS processing for enhanced monitoring of water for low‐level microbial targets and for reducing sample variability in long‐term monitoring programmes.     

Examination of microbial contaminants of emergency showers and eyewash stations

To evaluate the effects of regular flushing, water from fifty emergency eyewash and shower stations was cultured for the presence of potentially pathogenic protozoa, heterotrophic bacteria, and Legionella species. This study also provided the opportunity to evaluate a commercially available molecular assay for the direct detection of Legionella sp in environmental samples. The Perkin Elmer Legionella EnviroAmp polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit and culture on buffered charcoal yeast extract agar were used to detect Legionella species in water samples. Chemical and physical parameters of station water measured included: pH, hardness, alkalinity, turbidity, conductivity, total chlorine and assimilable organic carbon. Protozoal isolates were identified by classical identification methods, and isolates from the stations were identified as Hartmannella sp, Vexillifera sp, Vahlkampfia sp, Acanthamoeba sp, and Vanella sp. Heterotrophic plate counts ranged from 10² to 10⁶ CFU ml⁻¹ and acridine orange total counts ranged from 10³ to 10⁶ cells ml⁻¹ after regular flushing. PCR and gene probe analysis showed that 89% of the stations (eyewash and shower) were positive for Legionella species by PCR, while 6% of the samples were culture positive. These results indicate that routine flushing alone is not sufficient to control microbial contamination and disinfection must also be included in a routine maintenance program. In addition, regular maintenance, disinfection, and monitoring of emergency eyewash and shower stations is important in preventing potential secondary microbial infections by either direct inoculation or aerosol transmission. Received 02 September 1997/ Accepted in revised form 29 November 1997     

Incidence of Legionella and heterotrophic bacteria in household rainwater tanks in Azumino,Nagano prefecture,Japan

Many administrative agencies in Japan are encouraging installation of household rainwater‐storage tanks for more effective use of natural rainwater. Water samples were collected periodically from 43 rainwater tanks from 40 households and tested for the presence of Legionella species and the extent of heterotrophic bacteria in Azumino city, Nagano prefecture, Japan. PCR assays indicated the presence of Legionella spp. in 12 (30%) of the 43 tank water samples. Attempts were made to identify correlations between PCR positive samples, topography, pH, chemical oxygen demand (COD), atmospheric temperature and the numbers of heterotrophic bacteria. Between June and October, 2012, the numbers of heterotrophic bacteria in rainwater tanks and the values of COD positively correlated with the presence of Legionella species. In most of the Legionella‐positive cases, heterotrophic bacterial cell counts were >10⁴ CFU/mL. Moreover, Legionella species were less frequently detected when the COD value was >5 mg KMnO₄/L. Therefore, at least in Azumino, Japan between June and October 2012, both heterotrophic bacterial counts and COD values may be considered index parameters for the presence of Legionella cells in rainwater tanks. Much more accumulation of such data is needed to verify the accuracy of these findings.     

Comparison of Detection Methods for Legionella Species in Environmental Water by Colony Isolation,Fluorescent Antibody Staining,and Polymerase Chain Reaction

Three detection methods for Legionella species in water samples from cooling towers and a river were examined. Direct counting of bacteria stained with fluorescent antibody (FA) for L. pneumophila (serogroups 1 to 6) could detect the cell of 10⁴ to 10⁶ cell/100 ml in all 14 samples, while colony counting method detected 10 to 10³ CFU/100 ml only in 8 samples from cooling towers. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with primers to amplify 16S ribosomal DNA sequence of most Legionella species (LEG primer) detected legionellae in 13 samples, while species-specific primers for L. pneumophila detected the DNAs from 3 samples. In laboratory examination, LEG primers could amplify DNAs of 29 species of genus Legionella with high sensitivity, even from 1 cell of L. pneumophila GIFU 9134. The PCR assay with LEG primers was specific and sensitive methods to be satisfied the survey of legionellae. Thus, PCR assay is a suitable method to detect and monitor Legionella species in an environment.     

Adaptation of amoebae to cooling tower biocides

Adaptation of amoebae to four cooling tower Biocides, which included a thiocarbamate compound, tributyltin neodecanoate mixed with quaternary ammonium compounds (TBT/QAC), another QAC alone, and an isothiazolin derivative, was studied. Previously we found that amoebae isolated from waters of cooling towers were more resistant to cooling tower biocides than amoebae from other habitats. Acanthamoeba hatchetti and Cochliopodium bilimbosum, obtained from American Type Culture Collection and used in the previous studies, were tested to determine whether they could adapt to cooling tower Biocides. A. hatchetti was preexposed to subinhibitory concentrations of the four Biocides for 72h, after which they were tested for their resistance to the same and other biocides. C. bilimbosum was exposed to only two biocides, as exposure to the other two was lethal after 72 h. Preexposure to the subinhibitory concentrations of the Biocides increased the resistance of the amoebae, as indicated by a significant increase in the minimum inhibitory concentration (up to 30-fold). In addition, cross-resistance was also observed, i.e., exposure to one biocide caused resistance to other biocides. These results show that amoebae can adapt to biocides in a short time. The phenomenon of cross-resistance indicates that regularly alternating biocides, as is done to control microbial growth in cooling towers, may not be effective in keeping amoeba populations in check. On the contrary, exposure to one biocide may boost the amoebae's resistance to a second biocide before the second biocide is used in the cooling tower. Since amoebae may harbor Legionella, or alone cause human diseases, these results may be important in designing effective strategies for controlling pathogens in cooling towers. Correspondence to: S.G. Berk.     

Rapid Detection and Enumeration of Legionella pneumophila in Hot Water Systems by Solid-Phase Cytometry

A new method for the rapid and sensitive detection of Legionella pneumophila in hot water systems has been developed. The method is based on an IF assay combined with detection by solid-phase cytometry. This method allowed the enumeration of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 and L. pneumophila serogroups 2 to 6, 8 to 10, and 12 to 15 in tap water samples within 3 to 4 h. The sensitivity of the method was between 10 and 100 bacteria per liter and was principally limited by the filtration capacity of membranes. The specificity of the antibody was evaluated against 15 non-Legionella strains, and no cross-reactivity was observed. When the method was applied to natural waters, direct counts of L. pneumophila were compared with the number of CFU obtained by the standard culture method. Direct counts were always higher than culturable counts, and the ratio between the two methods ranged from 1.4 to 325. Solid-phase cytometry offers a fast and sensitive alternative to the culture method for L. pneumophila screening in hot water systems.     

Application of multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) for accurate identification of Legionella spp. Isolated from municipal fountains in Chengdu, China, based on 16S rRNA, mip, and rpoB genes

Legionellosis (Legionnaires’ disease; LD) is a form of severe pneumonia caused by species of Legionella bacteria. Because inhalation of Legionella-contaminated aerosol is considered the major infection route, routine assessments of potential infection sources such as hot water systems, air-conditioner cooling water, and municipal fountains are of great importance. In this study, we utilized in vitro culture and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) targeting 16S rRNA, mip, rpoB, and mip-rpoB concatenation to isolate and identify Legionella spp. from 5 municipal fountains in Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China. Our results demonstrated that 16S rRNA was useful for initial identification, as it could recognize isolates robustly at the genus level, while the genes mip, rpoB, and mip-rpoB concatenation could confidently discriminate Legionella species. Notably, the three subspecies of L. pneumophila could be distinguished by the analysis based on rpoB. The serotyping result of strain CD-1 was consistent with genetic analysis based on the concatenation of mip and rpoB. Despite regular maintenance and sanitizing methods, 4 of the 5 municipal fountains investigated in this study were positive for Legionella contamination. Thus, regularly scheduled monitoring of municipal fountains is urgently needed as well as vigilant disinfection. Although the application of MLSA for inspection of potential sites of infection in public areas is not standard procedure, further investigations may prove its usefulness.