Gyrase inhibitors and thymine starvation disrupt the normal pattern of plasmid RK2 localization in Escherichia coli

Multicopy plasmids in Escherichia coli are not randomly distributed throughout the cell but exist as defined clusters that are localized at the mid-cell, or at the 1/4 and 3/4 cell length positions. To explore the factors that contribute to plasmid clustering and localization, E. coli cells carrying a plasmid RK2 derivative that can be tagged with a green fluorescent protein-LacI fusion protein were subjected to various conditions that interfere with plasmid superhelicity and/or DNA replication. The various treatments included thymine starvation and the addition of the gyrase inhibitors nalidixic acid and novobiocin. In each case, localization of plasmid clusters at the preferred positions was disrupted but the plasmids remained in clusters, suggesting that normal plasmid superhelicity and DNA synthesis in elongating cells are not required for the clustering of individual plasmid molecules. It was also observed that the inhibition of DNA replication by these treatments produced filaments in which the plasmid clusters were confined to one or two nucleoid bodies, which were located near the midline of the filament and were not evenly spaced throughout the filament, as is found in cells treated with cephalexin. Finally, the enhanced yellow fluorescent protein-RarA fusion protein was used to localize the replication complex in individual E. coli cells. Novobiocin and nalidixic acid treatment both resulted in rapid loss of RarA foci. Under these conditions the RK2 plasmid clusters were not disassembled, suggesting that a completely intact replication complex is not required for plasmid clustering.     

Compatible bacterial plasmids are targeted to independent cellular locations in Escherichia coli

Targeting of DNA molecules to specific subcellular positions is essential for efficient segregation, but the mechanisms underlying these processes are poorly understood. In Escherichia coli, several plasmids belonging to different incompatibility groups (F, P1 and RK2) localize preferentially near the midcell and quartercell positions. Here we compare the relative positions of these three plasmids using fluorescence in situ hybridization. When plasmids F and P1 were localized simultaneously using differentially labeled probes, the majority of foci (approximately 75%) were well separated from each other. Similar results were found when we compared the subcellular localization of F with RK2, and RK2 with P1: regardless of the number of foci per cell or growth conditions, most of the foci (70-80%) were not in close proximity to one another. We also localized RK2 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Vibrio cholerae, and found that plasmid RK2 localization is conserved across bacterial species. Our results suggest that each plasmid has its own unique subcellular address, implying a mechanism for the stable co-existence of plasmids in which subcellular targeting plays a major role.     

The incC korB region of RK2 repositions a mini-RK2 replicon in Escherichia coli

Analysis by fluorescence microscopy has established that plasmid RK2 in Escherichia coli and other gram-negative bacteria is present as discrete clusters that are located inside the nucleoid at the mid- or quarter-cell positions. A mini-RK2 replicon containing an array of tetO repeats was visualized in E. coli cells that express a TetR-EYFP fusion protein. Unlike intact RK2, the RK2 mini-replicon (pCV1) was localized as a cluster at the cell poles outside of the nucleoid. Insertion of the O(B1)incC korB partitioning (par) region of RK2 into pCV1 resulted in a shift of the mini-replicon to within the nucleoid region at the mid- and quarter-cell positions. Despite the repositioning of the mini-RK2 replicon to the cellular positions where intact RK2 is normally located, the insertion of the intact O(B1) incC korB region did not significantly stabilize the mini-RK2 plasmid during cell growth. Deletions within the O(B1)incC or the korB region resulted in a failure of this par region to move pCV1 out of its polar position. The insertion of the par system of plasmid F into pCV1 resulted in a similar shift in the location of pCV1 to the nucleoid region. Unlike O(B1)incC korB, the insertion of the RK2 parABC resolvase system into pCV1 did not affect the polar positioning of pCV1. This effect of O(B1)incC korB on the location of pCV1 provides additional evidence for a partitioning role of this region of plasmid RK2. However, the failure of this region to significantly increase the stability of the mini-RK2 plasmid indicates that the localization of the plasmid to the mid- and quarter cell positions in E. coli is not in itself sufficient for the stable maintenance of plasmid RK2.     

Bacterial plasmid partition machinery: a minimalist approach to survival

The accurate segregation or partition of replicated DNA is essential for ensuring stable genome transmission. Partition of bacterial plasmids requires only three elements: a centromere-like DNA site and two proteins, a partition NTPase, and a centromere-binding protein (CBP). Because of this simplicity, partition systems have served as tractable model systems to study the fundamental molecular mechanisms required for DNA segregation at an atomic level. In the last few years, great progress has been made in this endeavor. Surprisingly, these studies have revealed that although the basic partition components are functionally conserved between three types of plasmid partition systems, these systems employ distinct mechanisms of DNA segregation. This review summarizes the molecular insights into plasmid segregation that have been achieved through these recent structural studies.     

Replication of plasmids in gram-negative bacteria.

Replication of plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is dependent on three stages: initiation, elongation, and termination. The first stage, initiation, depends on plasmid-encoded properties such as the replication origin and, in most cases, the replication initiation protein (Rep protein). In recent years the understanding of initiation and regulation of plasmid replication in Escherichia coli has increased considerably, but it is only for the ColE1-type plasmids that significant biochemical data about the initial priming reaction of DNA synthesis exist. Detailed models have been developed for the initiation and regulation of ColE1 replication. For other plasmids, such as pSC101, some hypotheses for priming mechanisms and replication initiation are presented. These hypotheses are based on experimental evidence and speculative comparisons with other systems, e.g., the chromosomal origin of E. coli. In most cases, knowledge concerning plasmid replication is limited to regulation mechanisms. These mechanisms coordinate plasmid replication to the host cell cycle, and they also seem to determine the host range of a plasmid. Most plasmids studied exhibit a narrow host range, limited to E. coli and related bacteria. In contrast, some others, such as the IncP plasmid RK2 and the IncQ plasmid RSF1010, are able to replicate in nearly all gram-negative bacteria. This broad host range may depend on the correct expression of the essential rep genes, which may be mediated by a complex regulatory mechanism (RK2) or by the use of different promoters (RSF1010). Alternatively or additionally, owing to the structure of their origin and/or to different forms of their replication initiation proteins, broad-host-range plasmids may adapt better to the host enzymes that participate in initiation. Furthermore, a broad host range can result when replication initiation is independent of host proteins, as is found in the priming reaction of RSF1010.     

Mechanism of retrotransfer in conjugation: prior transfer of the conjugative plasmid is required.

Bacterial conjugation normally involves the unidirectional transfer of DNA from donor to recipient. Occasionally, conjugation results in the transfer of DNA from recipient to donor, a phenomenon known as retrotransfer. Two distinct models have been generally considered for the mechanism of retrotransfer. In the two-way conduction model, no transfer of the conjugative plasmid is required. The establishment of a single conjugation bridge between donor and recipient is sufficient for the transfer of DNA in both directions. In the one-way conduction model, transfer of the conjugative plasmid to the recipient is required to allow the synthesis of a new conjugation bridge for the transfer of DNA from recipient to donor. We have tested these models by the construction of a mutant of the self-transmissible, IncP plasmid RK2lac that allows the establishement of the conjugation bridge but is incapable of self-transfer. Four nucleotides of the nic region of the origin of transfer (oriT) were changed directly in the 67-kb plasmid RK2lac by a simple adaptation of the vector-mediated excision (VEX) strategy for precision mutagenesis of large plasmids (E. K.Ayres, V. J. Thomson, G. Merino, D. Balderes, and D. H. Figurski, J. Mol. Biol. 230:174-185, 1993). The resulting RK2lac oriT1 mutant plasmid mobilizes IncQ or IncP oriT+ plasmids efficiently but transfers itself at a frequency which is 10(4)-fold less than that of the wild type. Whereas the wild-type RK2lac oriT+ plasmid promotes the retrotransfer of an IncQ plasmid from Escherichia coli or Pseudomonas aeruginosa recipients, the RK2lac oriT1 mutant is severely defective in retrotransfer. Therefore, retrotransfer requires prior transfer of the conjugative plasmid to the recipient. The results prove that retrotransfer occurs by two sequential DNA transfer events.     

A Model for the Evolution of Biological Specificity: a Cross-Reacting DNA-Binding Protein Causes Plasmid Incompatibility

Few biological systems permit rigorous testing of how changes in DNA sequence give rise to adaptive phenotypes. In this study, we sought a simplified experimental system with a detailed understanding of the genotype-to-phenotype relationship that could be altered by environmental perturbations. We focused on plasmid fitness, i.e., the ability of plasmids to be stably maintained in a bacterial population, which is dictated by the plasmid''s replication and segregation machinery. Although plasmid replication depends on host proteins, the type II plasmid partitioning (Par) machinery is entirely plasmid encoded and relies solely on three components: parC, a centromere-like DNA sequence, ParR, a DNA-binding protein that interacts with parC, and ParM, which forms actin-like filaments that push two plasmids away from each other at cell division. Interactions between the Par operons of two related plasmids can cause incompatibility and the reduced transmission of one or both plasmids. We have identified segregation-dependent plasmid incompatibility between the highly divergent Par operons of plasmids pB171 and pCP301. Genetic and biochemical studies revealed that the incompatibility is due to the functional promiscuity of the DNA-binding protein ParR_pB171, which interacts with both parC DNA sequences to direct plasmid segregation, indicating that the lack of DNA binding specificity is detrimental to plasmid fitness in this environment. This study therefore successfully utilized plasmid segregation to dissect the molecular interactions between genotype, phenotype, and fitness.     

Broad-host-range properties of plasmid RK2: importance of overlapping genes encoding the plasmid replication initiation protein TrfA.

The trfA gene, encoding the essential replication initiation protein of the broad-host-range plasmid RK2, possesses an in-frame overlapping arrangement. This results in the production of TrfA proteins of 33 and 44 kDa, respectively. Utilizing deletion and site-specific mutagenesis to alter the trfA operon, we compared the replication of an RK2-origin plasmid in several distantly related gram-negative bacteria when supported by both TrfA-44 and TrfA-33, TrfA-33 alone, or TrfA-44/98L (a mutant form of the TrfA-44 protein) alone. TrfA-44/98L is identical to wild-type TrfA-44 with the exception of a single conservative amino acid alteration from methionine to leucine at codon 98; this alteration removes the translational start codon for the TrfA-33 protein. Copy number and stability were virtually identical for plasmids containing both TrfA-44 and TrfA-33 proteins or TrfA-44/98L alone in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Agrobacterium tumefaciens, two unrelated bacteria in which TrfA-33 is poorly functional. This, along with recent in vitro studies comparing TrfA-44, TrfA-33, and TrfA-44/98L, suggests that the functional activity of TrfA-44 is not significantly affected by the 98L mutation. Analysis of minimal RK2 derivatives in certain gram-negative bacterial hosts suggests a role of the overlapping arrangement of trfA in facilitating the broad host range of RK2. RK2 derivatives encoding TrfA-44/98L alone demonstrated decreased copy number and stability in Escherichia coli and Azotobacter vinelandii when compared with derivatives specifying both TrfA-44 and TrfA-33. A strategy employing the trfA-44/98L mutant gene and in vivo homologous recombination was used to eliminate the internal translational start codon of trfA in the intact RK2 plasmid. The mutant intact RK2 plasmid produced only TrfA-44/98L. A small reduction in copy number and beta-lactamase expression resulted in E. coli, suggesting that overlapping trfA genes also enhance the efficiency of replication of the intact RK2 plasmid.     

Characterization of the double-partitioning modules of R27: correlating plasmid stability with plasmid localization

Plasmid R27 contains two independent partitioning modules, designated Par1 and Par2, within transfer region 2. Par1 is member of the type I partitioning family (Walker-type ATPase), and Par2 is a member of the type II partitioning family (actin-type ATPase). Stability tests of cloned Par1 and Par2 and insertional disruptions of Par1 and Par2 within R27 demonstrated that Par1 is the major stability determinant whereas Par2 is the minor stability determinant. Creation of double-partitioning mutants resulted in R27 integrating into the chromosome, suggesting that at least one partitioning module is required for R27 to exist in the extrachromosomal form. Using the lacO/LacI-green fluorescent protein (GFP) system, we labeled and visualized R27 and R27 partitioning mutants (Par1(-) and Par2(-)) under different growth conditions in live Escherichia coli cells. Plasmid R27 was visualized as the discrete GFP foci present at the mid- and quarter-cell regions in >99% of the cells. Time lapse experiments demonstrated that an increase in R27 plasmid foci resulted from focus duplication in either the mid- or quarter-cell regions of E. coli. Both R27 Par(-) variants gave a high percentage of plasmidless cells, as suggested by a uniform GFP signal, and cells with GFP patterns scattered throughout the entire cell, suggesting that plasmid molecules are randomly distributed throughout the cytoplasm. Those cells that did contain R27 Par(-) with one or two discrete foci had localization patterns that were statistically different from those formed with wild-type R27. Therefore, these results suggest that partitioning-impaired plasmids are characterized by individual and clustered plasmids that are randomly located within the host cytoplasm.     

Conditional lethal mutants of the kilB determinant of broad host range plasmid RK2

We have examined the relationship of kilB to the other known determinants which map in the 14'-22' region of RK2. These are trfA, which encodes a diffusible replication function, and tra3, which specifies a function required for plasmid transmissibility. We found that, in addition to kilB, both tra3 and trfA functions are expressed by the cloned 14'-22' region of RK2. Four temperature-sensitive mutants of kilB were isolated by in vitro mutagenesis of the cloned segment. At 42 degrees C these mutant plasmids can be maintained in Escherichia coli cells which lack a korB+ helper plasmid. At 30 degrees C the helper plasmid is required. Our analysis of these mutants revealed that kilB function is distinct from those of trfA and tra3. One mutant plasmid was temperature-sensitive for maintenance of an RK2 ori plasmid, but this phenotype was shown to be independent of the KilB(ts) phenotype. Thus, kilB appears to be a separate new locus in this portion of the RK2 genome. In addition, these mutants allowed us to test for the existence of an essential replication determinant (trfB) in the 50.4'-56.4' region of RK2. Our results demonstrate that this region is non-essential for replication from the RK2 ori in E. coli. We propose an alternative hypothesis to explain the role of the RK2 trfB region for plasmid maintenance in E. coli.     

Centromere binding and evolution of chromosomal partition systems in the Burkholderiales

How split genomes arise and evolve in bacteria is poorly understood. Since each replicon of such genomes encodes a specific partition (Par) system, the evolution of Par systems could shed light on their evolution. The cystic fibrosis pathogen Burkholderia cenocepacia has three chromosomes (c1, c2, and c3) and one plasmid (pBC), whose compatibility depends on strictly specific interactions of the centromere sequences (parS) with their cognate binding proteins (ParB). However, the Par systems of B. cenocepacia c2, c3, and pBC share many features, suggesting that they arose within an extended family. Database searching revealed seven subfamilies of Par systems like those of B. cenocepacia. All are from plasmids and secondary chromosomes of the Burkholderiales, which reinforces the proposal of an extended family. The subfamily of the Par system of B. cenocepacia c3 includes plasmid variants with parS sequences divergent from that of c3. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA), we found that ParB-c3 binds specifically to centromeres of these variants, despite high DNA sequence divergence. We suggest that the Par system of B. cenocepacia c3 has preserved the features of an ancestral system. In contrast, these features have diverged variably in the plasmid descendants. One such descendant is found both in Ralstonia pickettii 12D, on a free plasmid, and in Ralstonia pickettii 12J, on a plasmid integrated into the main chromosome. These observations suggest that we are witnessing a plasmid-chromosome interaction from which a third chromosome will emerge in a two-chromosome species.     

Role of the mukB gene in chromosome and plasmid partition in Escherichia coli

The intracellular locations of oriC and oriR1, the replication origins of the chromosome and plasmid R1, respectively, were visualized by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in exponentially growing populations of Escherichia coli. The locations of oriC and oriR1 (from a Par+ R1 plasmid) were unique and different in the wild-type host. In a mukB mutant, the positions were perturbed for both origins. The position of oriR1 from a plasmid with active partition (Par+) in the mukB host was as randomized as that of oriR1 from the Par- plasmid in a wild-type host. However, this mukB-induced randomization did not result in unstable inheritance of the Par+ plasmid, as measured by the conventional segregation assay. This might result from the preferential association of the Par+ plasmid with the bigger, decondensed nucleoid-containing daughters during cell division of MukB- cells, whereas the Par- plasmids were distributed at random and were lost by frequently ending up in anucleate cells.     

Plasmid partition system of the P1par family from the pWR100 virulence plasmid of Shigella flexneri

P1par family members promote the active segregation of a variety of plasmids and plasmid prophages in gram-negative bacteria. Each has genes for ParA and ParB proteins, followed by a parS partition site. The large virulence plasmid pWR100 of Shigella flexneri contains a new P1par family member: pWR100par. Although typical parA and parB genes are present, the putative pWR100parS site is atypical in sequence and organization. However, pWR100parS promoted accurate plasmid partition in Escherichia coli when the pWR100 Par proteins were supplied. Unique BoxB hexamer motifs within parS define species specificities among previously described family members. Although substantially different from P1parS from the P1 plasmid prophage of E. coli, pWR100parS has the same BoxB sequence. As predicted, the species specificity of the two types proved identical. They also shared partition-mediated incompatibility, consistent with the proposed mechanistic link between incompatibility and species specificity. Among several informative sequence differences between pWR100parS and P1parS is the presence of a 21-bp insert at the center of the pWR100parS site. Deletion of this insert left much of the parS activity intact. Tolerance of central inserts with integral numbers of helical DNA turns reflects the critical topology of these sites, which are bent by binding the host IHF protein.     

Pedigree analysis of plasmid segregation in yeast

We have used pedigree analysis to investigate the mitotic segregation of circular and linear DNA plasmids in Saccharomyces cerevisae. Circular ARS plasmids, which bear putative chromosomal replication origins, have a high segregation frequency and a strong bias to segregate to the mother cell at mitosis. The segregation bias explains how the fraction of plasmid-bearing cells can be small despite the high average copy number of circular ARS plasmids. Linear ARS plasmids do not show strong segregation bias, nor does the 2 mu ori-containing plasmid YEp 13, when it is present in strains containing intact 2 mu circles. In the absence of endogenous 2 mu circles, YEp 13 behaves like an ARS plasmid, showing a strong maternal segregation bias. The presence of a centromere on circular ARS plasmids eliminates segregation bias. We discuss a model for plasmid segregation, which explains these findings and the possible biological significance of mother-daughter segregation bias.     

Effect of growth rate and incC mutation on symmetric plasmid distribution by the IncP-1 partitioning apparatus

The incC and korB genes of IncP-1 plasmid RK2 encode homologues of ubiquitous ParA and ParB partitioning proteins of bacterial plasmids and chromosomes. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found that KorB, which binds to 12 widely distributed sites on the genome, is located in symmetrically placed foci in cells containing IncP-1 plasmids. When maintained by the low-copy-number P7 replicon, an RK2 segment including incC, korB and the kla, kle and korC regions encodes an efficient partitioning system that gives a pattern of foci similar to RK2 itself. Symmetrical distribution of KorB foci correlates with segregational stability conferred by either the IncP-1 or P7 partitioning systems; KorB distribution follows plasmid distribution. In the absence of a second partitioning system, incC inactivation resulted in paired or clumped foci that were not symmetrically distributed. At a slow growth rate, position analysis of foci showed a cycle from one central focus to two foci (at one- and three-quarter positions) and back, and at a high growth rate it showed a cycle from two foci to four and back. This pattern fits with the plasmid being coupled to the replication zones in the cell and being moved to successively younger zones by active partitioning, indicating a tight association between replication and partitioning.     

Physical and genetic studies with restriction endonucleases on the broad host-range plasmid RK2.

The cleavage map of the plasmid RK2 was determined for the five restriction endonucleases EcoRI, HindIII, BamH-I, SalI and HpaI. DNA has been inserted into several of these sites and cloned in Escherichia coli. Efforts to obtain derivatives of RK2 reduced in size by restriction endonuclease digestion of the plasmid were not successful and indicated that genes required for the maintenance of this plasmid in E. coli are not tightly clustered. An RK2 derivative possessing an internal molecular rearrangement was obtained by transformation with restriction endonuclease digests of the plasmid.     

Polar localization of replicon origins in the multipartite genomes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Sinorhizobium meliloti

The origins of replication of many different bacteria have been shown to reside at specific subcellular locations, but the mechanisms underlying their positioning and segregation are still being elucidated. In particular, little is known about the replication of multipartite genomes in bacteria. We determined the cellular positions of the origins of the replicons in the alpha proteobacteria Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Sinorhizobium meliloti and found that they are located at the poles of the cells. Our work demonstrates the conserved extreme polar localization of circular chromosome origins in these alpha proteobacteria and is also the first to specify the cellular location of origin regions from the repABC family. The cellular location of a derivative of the RK2 plasmid is distinct from that of the alpha proteobacterium genomic replicon origins but is conserved across bacteria. Colocalization experiments with the genomic replicons of A. tumefaciens revealed that the repABC replicons, although preferentially positioned at the cell pole, colocalize only rarely. For the repABC replicons in this organism, occupying discrete spatial locations may contribute to their coexistence and stable inheritance.     

Generation in vitro of deletions in the broad host range plasmid RK2 using phage Mu insertions and a restriction endonuclease

Several non-lethal deletions of the broad host range plasmid RK2 (molecular weight of 37.6 . 10(6) have been produced in vitro. The method employed relied on the single HindIII restriction nuclease site in RK2 and the ability of phage Mu to insert and thereby add new HindIII restriction sites at various positions in the plasmid. The deleted plasmids have in each case lost kanamycin (Km) resistance, and in two cases are defective in self-transmissibility. The method used to reduce the size of the RK2 plasmid also results in the cloning of each of the two ends of the Mu phage DNA on the plasmid derivatives.     

Bacterial mitosis: ParM of plasmid R1 moves plasmid DNA by an actin-like insertional polymerization mechanism

Bacterial DNA segregation takes place in an active and ordered fashion. In the case of Escherichia coli plasmid R1, the partitioning system (par) separates paired plasmid copies and moves them to opposite cell poles. Here we address the mechanism by which the three components of the R1 par system act together to generate the force required for plasmid movement during segregation. ParR protein binds cooperatively to the centromeric parC DNA region, thereby forming a complex that interacts with the filament-forming actin-like ParM protein in an ATP-dependent manner, suggesting that plasmid movement is powered by insertional polymerization of ParM. Consistently, we find that segregating plasmids are positioned at the ends of extending ParM filaments. Thus, the process of R1 plasmid segregation in E. coli appears to be mechanistically analogous to the actin-based motility operating in eukaryotic cells. In addition, we find evidence suggesting that plasmid pairing is required for ParM polymerization.