Modification of nerve growth factor receptor properties by wheat germ agglutinin

PC12 is a nerve growth factor (NGF) responsive cell line which exhibits two classes of NGF receptors distinguishable by different kinetic rate constants, sensitivity to trypsin and resistance to Triton detergent solubilization. Whereas incubation of PC12 cells with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) prior to addition of 125I-NGF inhibits binding of NGF to both classes of receptors, treatment with WGA subsequent to incubation with NGF does not inhibit NGF binding but causes the class of NGF receptors which exhibit rapid or "Fast" dissociation kinetics prior to lectin treatment to be converted to the form which exhibits "Slow" dissociation kinetics. This WGA-mediated receptor conversion is lectin specific, blocked by N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, occurs at similar rates at 4 and 37 degrees C, and is not impaired by a metabolic poison. NGF receptors converted by WGA, like pre-existing Slow receptors, are resistant to trypsinization and remain associated to Triton X-100 extracted "cytoskeletons." Very similar results were obtained for NGF receptors on a human melanoma cell line A875. These results suggest that Fast and Slow receptors are two interconvertible forms of a single protein, rather than distinct proteins. The significance of the generality of these properties for NGF receptors from diverse species and cell types is discussed.     

Opposite Effects of the Melanocortin-2 (MC2) Receptor Accessory Protein MRAP on MC2 and MC5 Receptor Dimerization and Trafficking

MC2 (ACTH) receptors require MC2 receptor accessory protein (MRAP) to reach the cell surface. In this study, we show that MRAP has the opposite effect on the closely related MC5 receptor. In enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and microscopy experiments, MC2 receptor was retained in the endoplasmic reticulum in the absence of MRAP and targeted to the plasma membrane with MRAP. MC5 receptor was at the plasma membrane in the absence of MRAP, but trapped intracellularly when expressed with MRAP. Using bimolecular fluorescence complementation, where one fragment of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) was fused to receptors and another to MRAP, we showed that MC2 receptor-MRAP dimers were present at the plasma membrane, whereas MC5 receptor-MRAP dimers were intracellular. Both MC2 and MC5 receptors co-precipitated with MRAP. MRAP did not alter expression of β2-adrenergic receptors or co-precipitate with them. To determine if MRAP affects formation of receptor oligomers, we co-expressed MC2 receptors fused to YFP fragments in the presence or absence of MRAP. YFP fluorescence, reporting MC2 receptor homodimers, was readily detectable with or without MRAP. In contrast, MC5 receptor homodimers were visible in the absence of MRAP, but little fluorescence was observed by microscopic analysis when MRAP was co-expressed. Co-precipitation of differentially tagged receptors confirmed that MRAP blocks MC5 receptor dimerization. The regions of MRAP required for its effects on MC2 and MC5 receptors differed. These results establish that MRAP forms stable complexes with two different melanocortin receptors, facilitating surface expression of MC2 receptor but disrupting dimerization and surface localization of MC5 receptor.In mammals, the five members of the melanocortin (MC²) receptor family play diverse physiological roles. MC1 receptors (melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptors) control pigmentation in many animals, MC2 receptors (ACTH receptors) regulate adrenal corticosteroid synthesis, MC3 and MC4 receptors in brain influence food intake and energy expenditure, and MC5 receptors control exocrine gland secretion (1). Melanocortin receptors (MC1 through MC5) are structurally related G protein-coupled receptors that respond to agonists with an increase in cAMP. The receptors differ in their affinity for physiological agonists (α-, β-, and γ-melanocyte-stimulating hormone and ACTH) and antagonists (agouti and agouti-related protein).Unlike other melanocortin receptors, MC2 receptors are selectively regulated by ACTH. The MC2 receptor is also unusual in its requirement for an accessory protein, the MC2 receptor accessory protein (MRAP) (2). MRAP must be expressed with the MC2 receptor in order for the receptor to undergo glycosylation, traffic to the plasma membrane, bind ACTH, and stimulate adenylyl cyclase (2–4). Individuals with inactivating mutations of either the MC2 receptor or MRAP suffer from ACTH resistance and severe glucocorticoid deficiency (2).MRAP is a small protein with a conserved amino terminus, single membrane-spanning domain, and non-conserved carboxyl terminus that can also differ among splice variants. MRAP forms antiparallel homodimers, which are exceedingly rare structures, and it is these dimers that co-precipitate with the MC2 receptor (3). Mutagenic analysis has revealed that the carboxyl-terminal region of MRAP is not essential, but the amino-terminal and transmembrane regions are necessary for function (3–5). Deletion or alanine substitution of a critical four-amino acid segment, LDYI, at residues 18–21 of the mouse sequence, results in an MRAP molecule that facilitates expression of the MC2 receptor on the plasma membrane but does not allow the receptor to bind agonist or signal (4). MRAP is not required for cell surface expression of other melanocortin receptors and can inhibit expression or signaling in some cases (3, 6).The MC5 receptor was identified on the basis of its homology to other melanocortin receptors and is thought to be the ancestral ACTH (MC2) receptor (7). Analysis of MC5 receptor knock-out mice revealed that the MC5 receptor is important in controlling exocrine gland secretion (8) and behavioral responses depending on pheromones secreted by the preputial gland (9). MC2 and MC5 receptors are closely related, with 46% identity and 67% homology at the amino acid level, respectively. MC2 and MC5 receptors are both found on 3T3-L1 adipocytes and in some adipose tissues in animals (10, 11). Furthermore, MC2 and MC5 receptors are both expressed in adrenal cortex during embryonic development, when the MC5 receptor appears before the MC2 receptor (12). Mammalian MC2 and MC5 receptors are activated by different pro-opiomelanocortin peptides, responding physiologically to ACTH and melanocyte-stimulating hormone, respectively. Here we demonstrate that MC2 and MC5 receptors are also differentially regulated by MRAP, which exerts opposite effects on surface expression and dimerization of the two receptors.     

The role of receptor interactions in regulating ethylene signal transduction

The phytohormone ethylene is perceived in Arabidopsis by a five-member receptor family. Earlier work has demonstrated that the basic functional unit for an ethylene receptor is a disulfide-linked homodimer. We recently reported in The Journal of Biological Chemistry that the ethylene-receptor ETR1 physically associates with other ethylene receptors through higher order interactions, suggesting the existence of receptor clusters. Here we consider the implications of such clusters upon the mechanism of ethylene signal transduction. In particular, we consider how such clustering provides a cooperative mechanism, akin to what has been found for the prokaryotic chemoreceptors, by which plant sensitivity to ethylene may be increased. In addition, we consider how the dominant ethylene insensitivity conferred by some receptor mutations, such as etr1-1, may also be propagated by interactions among members of the ethylene receptor family.Key words: ethylene, receptor, ETR1, cooperativity, ArabidopsisThe plant hormone ethylene regulates growth and development, and is perceived by a five-member family of receptors (ETR1, ERS1, ETR2, ERS2 and EIN4) in Arabidopsis.¹ Genetic analysis indicates that ethylene receptors are functionally redundant and negatively regulate ethylene responses through interactions with the Raf-like kinase CTR1.^2–5 The functional unit of an ethylene receptor in a disulfide-linked homodimer, with each homodimer capable of binding one ethylene molecule.^6,7 However, several observations suggest that propagation of the ethylene signal through the receptors is likely to involve more than just ethylene-induced changes within individual receptor homodimers. First, Arabidopsis is amazingly sensitive to ethylene and can respond to ethylene concentrations as low as 0.2 nl/L,⁸ 300-fold lower than the K_d of the receptors for ethylene, which suggests that some mechanism exists for amplifying the input signal.^7,9 Second, ethylene-insensitive mutations in the binding sites of the receptors exhibit greater dominance than would be predicted solely from a lesion within one member of the receptor family.¹⁰In our paper published in The Journal of Biological Chemistry,¹¹ we demonstrate that the Arabidopsis ethylene receptor ETR1 physically associates with other ethylene receptors through higher order interactions. Such physical interactions suggest that the receptors exist in plants as clusters, and that models for cooperative signaling previously applied to the histidine-kinaselinked chemoreceptors of bacteria may also be applicable to the evolutionarily related ethylene receptors of plants. In bacteria, the highly packed chemoreceptors are found in clusters at one or both poles of the cell.^12,13 Structural studies indicate that chemoreceptors can associate to form a ‘trimer of dimers’^14,15 and also support the possibility that domain swapping may occur to produce a large interconnected array of receptors. 16 Our studies indicate that ethylene receptors can interact through their cytosolic GAF domains, identifying one possible interface through which conformational changes could be propagated in an ethylene receptor cluster.A higher-order cooperative mechanism among the ethylene receptors may explain the high sensitivity of plants to ethylene. In this model, the ethylene receptors amplify ethylene signaling by lateral signal output. Binding of ethylene to one receptor induces the conformation change of the receptor from a tense state (T) to a relaxed state (R). This conformational change is then propagated to other empty receptors in the cluster due to their physical associations with the receptor in the R state. As a result empty receptors also adopt the relaxed state (R′), resulting in amplification of the initial signal. It should be noted here that mutational evidence supports the unbound state of the receptors (T state) as being the lower energy conformation of the receptors.¹⁷ Thus, according to this model, part of the energy from ligand binding would be used to transmit conformational changes to the neighboring receptors.An alternative model that may also explain the high sensitivity of ethylene responsiveness in plants, and one that is not necessarily incompatible with the previous model, is a conjugation model.¹⁸ Here it is hypothesized that, due to the physical proximity of the ethylene receptors, that ethylene released from one receptor then binds to another receptor rather than diffusing away. Through this conjugation mechanism, one ethylene molecule could amplify its signal by converting the conformations of multiple ethylene receptors from the ethylene-unbound state (T) to the ethylene-bound state (R). This model is based on several assumptions. One assumption is that a single ethylene molecule can bind ethylene receptors in the same cluster multiple times due to the dynamic binding of ethylene and ethylene receptor. A second assumption is that, after ethylene is released from one ethylene receptor, the recovery time for that receptor to resume the T state is longer than the time required for the released ethylene to bind to and convert another receptor from the T to the R state.Models for cooperativity need to also explain the dominant ethylene insensitivity of various mutant receptors such as etr1-1, in which a missense mutation results in a receptor incapable of binding ethylene. Several studies indicate that the etr1-1 mutant receptor acts cooperatively to affect the signal output from other wild-type receptors (i.e., the presence of the etr1-1 receptor in its T state increases the likelihood of other receptors adopting the T state).^10,11 This observation can be most readily explained if the dominant ethylene-insensitive mutations result in a receptor that requires more energy to undergo the T to R transition than do the wild-type receptors. For example, the etr1-1 mutation may increase the stability of the T form (a T′ state). There is evidence to support this possibility. The etr1-1 missense mutation results in a receptor unable to chelate a copper cofactor necessary for ethylene binding,¹⁹ but the effects of this mutation on signaling are different from wild-type receptors that lack their copper cofactor. The etr1-1 mutant receptor appears locked in its T state, whereas wild-type receptors lacking the copper cofactor appear to be in the R state.²⁰ Thus etr1-1 is truly a gain-of-function mutation that alters the conformation of the receptor in ways not necessarily predicted from just the loss of the copper cofactor.In conclusion, we have attempted here to provide models that can resolve an apparent contradiction in the cooperative signaling behavior exhibited by ethylene receptors. The high sensitivity of plants to ethylene suggest cooperative changes in which an R state can be propagated within a receptor cluster, but the dominance of the ethylene ethylene-insensitive mutant etr1-1 suggests that the T state can also be propagated within a receptor cluster. It should be born in mind, however, that ethylene signaling is mediated by multiple signaling components. The ethylene receptors regulate ethylene responses through interaction with and modulation of CTR1 kinase activity. Thus, the total kinase activity of CTR1 represents the signal output from the receptors. This situation is very similar to that of the bacterial chemoreceptors, which regulate the activity of an associated histidine kinase, and, as with the chemoreceptors, the stoichiometry of CTR1 interactions with the ethylene receptors and the means by which its kinase activity is regulated are important for the elucidation of the mechanism of ethylene signal transduction.     

Expression and Characterization of Purinergic Receptors in Rat Middle Meningeal Artery–Potential Role in Migraine

The dura mater and its vasculature have for decades been central in the hypothesis of migraine and headache pathophysiology. Although recent studies have questioned the role of the vasculature as the primary cause, dural vessel physiology is still relevant in understanding the complex pathophysiology of migraine. The aim of the present study was to isolate the middle meningeal artery (MMA) from rodents and characterize their purinergic receptors using a sensitive wire myograph method and RT-PCR. The data presented herein suggest that blood flow through the MMA is, at least in part, regulated by purinergic receptors. P2X1 and P2Y6 receptors are the strongest contractile receptors and, surprisingly, ADPβS caused contraction most likely via P2Y1 or P2Y13 receptors, which is not observed in other arteries. Adenosine addition, however, caused relaxation of the MMA. The adenosine relaxation could be inhibited by {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"SCH58261","term_id":"1052882304","term_text":"SCH58261"}}SCH58261 (A2A receptor antagonist) and caffeine (adenosine receptor antagonist). This gives one putative molecular mechanism for the effect of caffeine, often used as an adjuvant remedy of cranial pain. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR expression data for the receptors correlate well with the functional findings. Together these observations could be used as targets for future understanding of the in vivo role of purinergic receptors in the MMA.     

Participation of Charged Amino Acid Residues of Cytoplasmic Loops of Serpentine Type Receptors in the Process of Transmission of Hormonal Signal

Regions of cytoplasmic loops (CL1, CL2, and CL3) and C-terminal domain (CTD) of receptors of the serpentine type, proximal to the membrane, are involved in the process of functional coupling to G-proteins. Theoretical analysis of 55 types of the G-protein-coupled receptors has shown that these regions (CL1, CL2, N- and C-terminal segments of CL3, N-terminal segment of CTD) have a significant positive charge: it amounts to 18.32 ± 0.55 in receptors of biogenic amines and muscarinic choline receptors and to 16.24 ± 0.52 in receptors of peptide and protein hormones. The value of the positive charge in the CL3 and CTD segments decreases with increase of distance from the membrane, while their charge distribution profile determines selectivity of interaction of the receptor with -subunits of the G-proteins belonging to G_s-, G_i/0-, and G_q/11-families. Distribution of the charged amino acids in CTD of some receptors can indicate their ability to form the fourth, additional, CL due to palmitoylation of cysteine residues located in CTD. Values of predisposition to form -helices in the CL and CTD regions of the receptors are calculated. It is shown that the predisposition to form helical structures is expressed to the greatest degree in N- and C-terminal segments of the CL3, its values felling markedly with increase of distance from the membrane. The predisposition to form the helices varies significantly both in different families of receptors (it is maximal in receptors of biogenic amines and muscarinic choline receptors) and in the receptors coupled to different families of G-proteins (it is most expressed in the receptors coupled to G_s- and G_q/11-proteins). Based on the obtained data, a probable mechanism is proposed of involvement of the cationic helices formed by the CL and CTD regions in transmission of the hormonal signal from the receptor to G-protein.     

Modeling of the two wave response of ATP receptors to jumps of the agonist concentration in pheochromocytoma cells

A model for the kinetics of conformational transitions of ionotropic ATP receptors in pheochromocytoma cells was elaborated. The contribution of the states of ionotropic receptors (upon the blockage of the "open" channel state) to the kinetics of postsynaptic currents was estimated at mediator concentrations studied. The model enables one to determine the contribution of various conformational states of the receptor, in particular in the "closed" state, to the dynamics of ionic current that is registered upon stimulation of ATP receptors. It is shown that after the cessation of the agonist application, a secondary current wave can arise. The rate constants for conformational transitions of ATP receptors were determined.     

Identification and characterization of glucocorticoid receptors in liver of nude mice

Glucocorticoids regulate the expression of many liver-specific genes via glucocorticoid receptors. The presence of glucocorticoid receptors in liver has been reported in many mammalian species but not in nude mice. In the present study, we demonstrate the presence of specific glucocorticoid receptors in nude mouse liver. The binding of ligands to these receptors could be completely inhibited by RU486, and partially blocked by hydrocortisone and progesterone, whereas estrogen and testosterone had no effect. Hydrocortisone down-regulated the level of glucocorticoid receptors in livers of nude mice and correspondingly enhanced the activities of tyrosine aminotransferase and -glutamyltransferase. Our results indicate that glucocorticoid receptors in nude mouse liver are specific, fully functional, and present at levels 28.5-fold higher than in the liver of normal inbred mice. We suggest that the nude mouse is a valuable model for studies of hepatic glucocorticoid action and may provide a clue to a putative hepatic-thymic interaction.     

Identification of the erythropoietin receptors of erythroleukemic cells

Erythropoietin (epo) is the physiologic regulator of red blood cell development. We have demonstrated the presence of epo receptors on two erythroleukemia cell lines, IW32 and IW201. IW32 produces epo constitutively while IW201 is a nonproducing cell line. Neither cell lines respond to epo to differentiate. In this study, we have shown that these cells bound 125I-epo specifically. Binding could be displaced by the presence of unlabeled epo but not by insulin or epidermal growth factor. In contrast to that found in epo responsive cells isolated from Friend virus infected mouse spleen, which were reported to contain both "high" and "low" affinity receptors, our finding indicated only a single class of "low" affinity receptors with apparent dissociation constants of 1.7 nM and 2.0 nM for IW32 and IW201 cell lines, respectively. It is suggested that the absence of "high" affinity receptors may account for the lack of responsiveness of these cells to epo.     

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors: receptor specificity versus functional redundancy

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive sphingolipid that has recently been shown to bind cell surface S1P receptors (previously called endothelial differentiation gene (Edg) receptors), which are members of the G-protein-coupled family of receptors. Signaling via S1P is a complex process, as cells usually express a number of these receptors on their surfaces. Many of the S1P receptors share common G-proteins, invoking the question of how these receptors are specific in their actions. This review describes the coupling pathways of S1P receptors, and highlights the in vitro and in vivo evidence for the "uniqueness" of each receptor in activating downstream signaling pathways, taking the effect of S1P on migration as an example.     

Analysis of Assembly and Trafficking of Native P2X4 and P2X7 Receptor Complexes in Rodent Immune Cells

P2X4 and P2X7 are the predominant P2X receptor subtypes expressed in immune cells. Having previously shown a structural and functional interaction between the two recombinant receptors, our aims here were to identify the preferred assembly pathway of the endogenous receptors in macrophage-like cells and to investigate the trafficking of these receptors between the plasma membrane and intracellular sites. We exploited the difference in size between the two subunits, and we used a combination of cross-linkers and blue native-PAGE analysis to investigate the subunit composition of complexes present in primary cultures of rat microglia and macrophages from wild type and P2X7^–/– mice. Our results indicate that the preferred assembly pathway for both receptors is the formation of homotrimers. Homotrimers of P2X7 were able to co-immunoprecipitate with P2X4, suggesting that an interaction occurs between rather than within receptor complexes. In both macrophages and microglia, P2X7 receptors were predominantly at the cell surface, whereas P2X4 receptors were predominantly intracellular. There were clear cell type-dependent differences in the extent to which P2X4 receptors trafficked to and from the surface; trafficking was much more dynamic in microglia than in the macrophages, and further activation of cultured microglia with relatively short (3-h) incubations with lipopolysaccharide caused an ∼4-fold increase in the fraction of receptors at the surface with only a 1.2-fold increase in total expression. The redistribution of intracellular receptors is thus an efficient means of enhancing the functional expression of P2X4 at the plasma membrane of microglia.Acting via P2X receptors, ATP has several effects on immune cells, including triggering the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, programmed cell death, and mycobacterial killing (1, 2). Until recently, attention has focused on the P2X7 receptor as the relevant sensor at the cell surface, and there is evidence for its involvement in neuropathic and inflammatory pain (3), arthritis (4), and the control of mycobacterial infection (5). P2X7 has a low affinity for ATP compared with the other predominant subtype expressed by immune cells, P2X4. The role of P2X4 receptors is less well understood, although in microglia they were shown to be up-regulated following peripheral nerve injury and to play an important role in the development of neuropathic pain (6). Regulation of the plasma membrane expression of these two receptors is not understood. Also, despite the considerable interest in both these receptor subtypes as potential targets in development of novel pain therapies, the subunit composition of the native receptors has not been determined.P2X receptor subunits associate to form trimeric complexes around a central conduction pore (7, 8). With the exception of P2X6, they form functional homomeric receptors, and several subtypes also form functional heterotrimers (9). There is also evidence that P2X receptors form larger signaling complexes, interacting with other neighboring P2X receptors and also with ion channels that belong to different structural classes, including members of the Cys loop receptor family (10) and the gap junction family (11). Higher order structures, with molecular mass corresponding to hexamers and nonamers, have been identified for heterologously expressed P2X2 and P2X4 receptors, suggesting that two or three receptors can form a stable association (12). Consistent with this idea, P2X receptor channels within a patch of membrane have been shown to open in a non-independent manner and to display positive cooperativity (13, 14).P2X4 and P2X7 are frequently co-expressed, not only in immune cells but also in epithelia and endothelia (15). The P2X7 subtype differs from other members of the family in that it has a very long cytoplasmic C-terminal tail, a low affinity toward ATP, is preferentially activated by BzATP, and couples to the opening of a pore permeable to large molecules up to 900 Da (2). P2X4 receptors have considerably higher affinity for ATP; they are up-regulated by the allosteric modulator ivermectin and are sensitive to the antagonist TNP-ATP³ at micromolar concentrations. It has been widely assumed that P2X7 does not form heteromeric assemblies with other members of the P2X family; however, recent evidence has indicated a structural and functional interaction between P2X4 and P2X7 receptors. First, P2X receptor currents recorded from airway-ciliated cells were reported to show a combination of P2X4-like and P2X7-like properties (16). Second, we showed that P2X4 and P2X7 could be co-immunoprecipitated both from mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) and also when heterologously co-expressed (17). In addition, we used two nonfunctional point mutants of P2X4 to demonstrate a functional interaction between the two receptors; one mutant exerted a dominant negative effect on P2X7 receptor currents, whereas another conferred P2X4-like properties on the whole cell currents, namely sensitivity to ivermectin and TNP-ATP. Our conclusion was that P2X4 and P2X7 form a heteromeric association but that it remained to be established whether or not they assemble as heterotrimers around the same conduction pore.In this study, we set out first to address the question of the preferred assembly pathway of native P2X4 and P2X7 receptors in immune cells, and second to compare how these receptors traffic within immune cells. We took advantage of the size difference between P2X4 and P2X7 subunits to analyze the composition of the predominant dimeric and trimeric forms. We found that in rodent macrophages and microglia, P2X4 and P2X7 receptors preferentially assemble as homotrimers. Comparison of the trafficking of these receptors indicated cell type-dependent differences in the extent to which the predominantly intracellular P2X4 receptor traffics to and from the surface.     

Extrasynaptic GABAA receptors in the crosshairs of hormones and ethanol

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the main chemical inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain. In the central nervous system (CNS) it acts on two distinct types of receptor: an ion channel, i.e., an "ionotropic" receptor permeable to Cl- and HCO3- (GABAA receptors) and a G-protein coupled "metabotropic" receptor that is linked to various effector mechanisms (GABAB receptors). This review will summarize novel developments in the physiology and pharmacology of GABAA receptors (GABAARs), specifically those found outside synapses. The focus will be on a particular combination of GABAAR subunits sensitive to ovarian and adrenal cortical steroid hormone metabolites that are synthesized in the brain (neurosteroids) and to sobriety impairing concentrations of ethanol. These receptors may be the final common pathway for interactions between ethanol and ovarian and stress-related neurosteroids.     

A transplantable rat Leydig cell tumor--1. LH and prolactin receptors and effects of the endocrine status of the host animal

We have examined the binding capacity and properties (affinity, specificity) of LH and prolactin (Prl) receptors in a transplantable rat Leydig cell tumor (H-540) grown in intact, castrated and hypophysectomized rats. LH receptors in adult rat testis and Prl receptors in the rat ventral prostate were examined simultaneously for comparison. The results can be summarized as follows: The qualitative properties (affinity, specificity) of LH and Prl receptors in tumor Leydig cells appear to be identical to those of corresponding receptors in non-tumor tissues. The levels of LH receptors in tumor Leydig cells are only some 1% of that present in normal Leydig cells from adult rats. Tumor Leydig cells grown in hypophysectomized rats had even lower levels of LH receptors; ca. 1/3 of that found in tumors from intact rats. The levels of Prl receptors in the tumor Leydig cells are almost as high as in normal Leydig cells from adult rats. In tumors grown in hypophysectomized rats, the levels of Prl receptors were much lower (ca. 20%) than in tumors from intact or castrated rats. There were great variations in the number of LH and Prl receptors in individual tumors, and there was a positive correlation (r = 0.88; P less than 0.01) between LH and Prl receptors in individual tumors. No differentiation toward a "LH receptor tumor" or "Prl receptor tumor" was observed. Thus, receptors for LH and Prl in tumor cells are qualitatively normal, but the number is greatly (LH) or moderately (Prl) reduced. These receptors in the tumor Leydig cells are stimulated by pituitary hormones.     

Anandamide receptors

Anandamide (N -arachidonoyl-ethanolamine, AEA) was the first endogenous ligand of cannabinoid receptors to be discovered. Yet, since early studies, AEA appeared to exhibit also some effects that were not mediated by cannabinoid CB(1) or CB(2) receptors. Indeed, AEA exerts some behavioral actions also in mice with genetically disrupted CB(1) receptors, whereas in vitro it is usually a partial agonist at these receptors and a weak activator of CB(2) receptors. Nevertheless, several pharmacological effects of AEA are mediated by CB(1) receptors, which, by being coupled to G-proteins, can be seen as AEA "metabotropic" receptors. Furthermore, at least two different, and as yet uncharacterized, G-protein-coupled AEA receptors have been suggested to exist in the brain and vascular endothelium, respectively. AEA is also capable of directly inhibiting ion currents mediated by L-type Ca(2+) channels and TASK-1 K(+) channels. However, to date the only reasonably well characterized, non-cannabinoid site of action for AEA is the vanilloid receptor type 1 (VR1), a non-selective cation channel gated also by capsaicin, protons and heat. VR1 might be considered as an AEA "ionotropic" receptor and, under certain conditions, mediates effects ranging from vasodilation, broncho-constriction, smooth muscle tone modulation and nociception to stimulation of hippocampal pair-pulse depression, inhibition of tumor cell growth and induction of apoptosis.     

Characterization of an altered membrane form of the beta-adrenergic receptor produced during agonist-induced desensitization

Incubation of 1321N1 human astrocytoma cells with 1 microM isoproterenol rapidly results in the conversion of a portion of the beta-adrenergic receptors to a membrane form that can be separated from markers for the plasma membrane by sucrose density gradient or differential centrifugation. This "light peak" form of the receptor reaches a maximal level within 10 min of incubation of cells with catecholamine. Two types of experiments suggest that the early phase of catecholamine-induced desensitization of the beta-adrenergic receptor-linked adenylate cyclase can be separated into at least two reactions. First, the agonist-induced loss of catecholamine-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity precedes the appearance of beta-adrenergic receptors in the light peak fraction by 1-2 min. Second, pretreatment of cells with concanavalin A prior to induction of desensitization blocks the formation of the light peak form of beta-adrenergic receptors without blocking the "uncoupling" reaction as measured by catecholamine-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity. Specificity for the reaction that converts beta-adrenergic receptors to the light peak form is indicated by the lack of a catecholamine-induced alteration in the sucrose density gradient distribution of muscarinic cholinergic receptors, adenylate cyclase or the guanine nucleotide-binding proteins, Ns and Ni. The light peak of beta-adrenergic receptors migrates at a density similar to that of at least a portion of the activity of galactosyltransferase, a marker for Golgi. Enzyme marker activities for lysosomes and endoplasmic reticulum are not associated with this population of beta-adrenergic receptors. Taken together, these and other data suggest that incubation of 1321N1 cells with isoproterenol results in a rapid uncoupling of beta-adrenergic receptors from adenylate cyclase which is followed by a change in the membrane form of the receptor. This latter step most likely represents internalization of receptors into a vesicular form which may then serve as the precursor state from which receptors are eventually lost from the cell.     

Contribution of GABA receptors in extinction of memory trace in norm and depressive-like state

The dependence of activation and blockade of GABA receptors influences on extinction of passive avoidance response from a type of receptors and initial psychoemotional state of mice is shown. The activation of GABAA receptors by muscimol disrupted extinction in norm and did not influence on delay of this process at mice with "behavioral despair". The activation of GABAB receptors by baclofen accelerated extinction of fair memory at mice with depressive-like state. The blockade of GABAA receptors by bicuculline was ineffective in modification of extinction. The blockade of GABAB receptors by phaclofen promoted retention of fear expression at intact mice and facilitation of extinction at "depressive" mice.     

Crystal structure of the human myeloid cell activating receptor TREM-1

Triggering receptors expressed on myeloid cells (TREM) are a family of recently discovered receptors that play important roles in innate immune responses, such as to activate inflammatory responses and to contribute to septic shock in response to microbial-mediated infections. To date, two TREM receptors in human and several homologs in mice have been identified. We report the 2.6 A resolution crystal structure of the extracellular domain of human TREM-1. The overall fold of the receptor resembles that of a V-type immunoglobulin domain with differences primarily located in the N-terminal strand. TREM-1 forms a "head-to-tail" dimer with 4100 A(2) interface area that is partially mediated by a domain swapping between the first strands. This mode of dimer formation is different from the "head-to-head" dimerization that existed in V(H)V(L) domains of antibodies or V domains of T cell receptors. As a result, the dimeric TREM-1 most likely contains two distinct ligand binding sites.     

Integrin activation is required for VEGF and FGF receptor protein presence on human microvascular endothelial cells

Endothelial cell proliferation and migration is initiated by growth factors including FGF and VEGF that bind to specific transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases. Mechanisms that regulate in vivo expression of fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) are not well understood. Since it is well known that different matrices influence the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells in culture, we hypothesized that changes in the extracellular matrix environment can regulate growth factor receptors on endothelial cells. We cultured human microvascular endothelial cells on different matrices (vitronectin, laminin, fibronectin, fibrin, and collagen IV) and examined for the presence of growth factor receptors (FGFR-1, FGFR-2, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2). We show that vitronectin increased the presence of all four growth factor receptors and most notably, VEGFR-1. In contrast, fibrin decreased all four receptors, especially FGFR-1 and FGFR-2. Inhibiting phosphotyrosine signaling abolished immunostaining for all four receptors, regardless of the matrix, but was not dependent on activating the Fyn-Shc pathway. Cells plated on vitronectin in the presence of blocking antibodies to integrins _v3 and _v5 similarly decreased presence of these growth factor receptors. Our data suggests a possible mechanism of how matrix-integrin interactions regulate endothelial cell responsiveness to growth factors and anchorage-dependent cell growth.     

Computer-Aided Receptor Modelling of Human Opioid Receptors: (Mu,Kappa & Delta)

Opioid receptors (OPRs) are important agents in the centeral nervous system (CNS) function. These receptors belong to G-Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) which have structural similarity with the BACTERIORHODOPSIN (bR). Because of receptor location in the membrane, three dimensional (3D) structure of GPCRs are unknown. The Computer-Aided Receptor Modelling on the basis of amino acid sequence, accompanied by the experimental results is a useful method to understanding the structure and mechanism of these receptors.In this study we tried to modell three types of Human Opioid Receptors; Mu, Kappa and Delta. We applied several methods to predict secondary structure (such as Hydropathicity Plot) of opioid receptors and also determined the possible regions of transmembrane helices (TMHs). Results were confirmed by inclusion of other human GPCRs sequence in multiple alignment methods. Then similarity between these receptors and bR were calculated on the basis of parameters such as Mutation Matrix and Secondary Structure Scale. After calculation and refinment of geometric coordinates of atoms located in helices by computerized mutation method (on the basis of 3D structure of bR, as a template) these data were corrected and optimized using Molecular Mechanics Calculations (AMBER Force Field). We used Morphin, Naloxone, Ethylketazocine (EKC) and SKF-10047 as general/specific ligand for these receptors. We optimized conformation of ligands by Quantum Mechanical Semiemprical Calculations (MOPAC). In final step we tried to dock ligands into the receptor cavity with attention to Mutagenesis Data and Structure-Activity Relationships (SAR) information.Our results show that in Delat receptors ASP-96 in TMH-II is important to binding of agonists and antagonists. In Mu receptors charged amino acid residues in TMH-II (ASP-116), TMH-III (ASP-149) and TMH-VI (HIS-299) interact with agonists. In Kappa receptors TMH-VI (GLU-297) and TMH-II (ASP-106) play a major role in interaction with antagonists. All of the mentioned residues are located in or near the inner cavity of receptors. With attention to results we suggest that other sites of receptors (such as loops and terminals) may be interact with ligands.     

Anaesthetic impairment of immune function is mediated via GABA(A) receptors

Background

GABA_A receptors are members of the Cys-loop family of neurotransmitter receptors, proteins which are responsible for fast synaptic transmission, and are the site of action of wide range of drugs [1]. Recent work has shown that Cys-loop receptors are present on immune cells, but their physiological roles and the effects of drugs that modify their function in the innate immune system are currently unclear [2]. We are interested in how and why anaesthetics increase infections in intensive care patients; a serious problem as more than 50% of patients with severe sepsis will die [3]–[6]. As many anaesthetics act via GABA_A receptors [7], the aim of this study was to determine if these receptors are present on immune cells, and could play a role in immunocompromising patients.

Principal Findings

We demonstrate, using RT-PCR, that monocytes express GABA_A receptors constructed of α1, α4, β2, γ1 and/or δ subunits. Whole cell patch clamp electrophysiological studies show that GABA can activate these receptors, resulting in the opening of a chloride-selective channel; activation is inhibited by the GABA_A receptor antagonists bicuculline and picrotoxin, but not enhanced by the positive modulator diazepam. The anaesthetic drugs propofol and thiopental, which can act via GABA_A receptors, impaired monocyte function in classic immunological chemotaxis and phagocytosis assays, an effect reversed by bicuculline and picrotoxin.

Significance

Our results show that functional GABA_A receptors are present on monocytes with properties similar to CNS GABA_A receptors. The functional data provide a possible explanation as to why chronic propofol and thiopental administration can increase the risk of infection in critically ill patients: their action on GABA_A receptors inhibits normal monocyte behaviour. The data also suggest a potential solution: monocyte GABA_A receptors are insensitive to diazepam, thus the use of benzodiazepines as an alternative anesthetising agent may be advantageous where infection is a life threatening problem.     

Functional characterization of polymorphic variants for ovine MT1 melatonin receptors: possible implication for seasonal reproduction in sheep

In seasonal breeding species, the gene encoding for the melatonin MT(1) receptor (oMT(1)) is highly polymorphic and numerous data have reported the existence of an association between an allele of the receptor and a marked expression of the seasonality of reproduction in ewes. This allele called "m" (previously named "-" allele) carries a mutation leading to the absence of a MnlI restriction site as opposed to the "M" allele (previously named "+" allele) carrying the MnlI restriction site (previously "+" allele). This allows the determination of the three genotypes "M/M" (+/+), "M/m" (+/-) and "m/m" (-/-). This mutation is conservative and could therefore not be causal. However, it is associated with another mutation introducing the change of a valine to an isoleucine in the fifth transmembrane domain of the receptor. Homozygous "M/M" and "m/m" animals consequently express structurally different receptors respectively named oMT(1) Val(220) and oMT(1) Ile(220). The objective of this study was to test whether these polymorphic variants are functionally different. To achieve this goal, we characterized the binding properties and the transduction pathways associated with both variants of the receptors. Using a pharmacological approach, no variation in binding parameters between the two receptors when transiently expressed in COS-7. In stably transfected HEK293 cells, significant differences were detected in the inhibition of cAMP production whereas receptors internalization processes were not different. In conclusion, the possibility that subtle alterations induced by the non conservative mutation in "m/m" animals might modify the perception of the melatoninergic signal is discussed in the context of melatonin action.