Molecular comparison of monocot and dicot U1 and U2 snRNAs

To elucidate differences between the pre-mRNA splicing components in monocots and dicots, we have cloned and characterized several U1 and U2 snRNA sequence variants expressed in wheat seedling nuclei. Primer extension sequencing on wheat and pea snRNA populations has demonstrated that two 5'-terminal nucleotides found in most other U1 snRNAs are missing/modified in many plant U1 snRNAs. Comparison of the wheat U1 and U2 snRNA variants with their counterparts expressed in pea nuclei has defined regions of structural divergence between monocot and dicot U1 and U2 snRNAs. The U1 and U2 snRNA sequences involved in RNA:RNA interaction with pre-mRNAs are absolutely conserved. Significant differences occur between wheat and pea U1 snRNAs in stem I and II structures implicated in the binding of U1-specific proteins suggesting that the monocot and dicot U1-specific snRNP proteins differ in their binding specificities. Stem III structures, which are required in mammalian systems for splicing complex formation but not for U1-specific protein binding, differ more extensively than stems I, II, or IV. In U2 snRNAs, the sequence differences between these two species are primarily localized in stem III and in stem IV which has been implicated in snRNP protein binding. These differences suggest that monocot and dicot U1 and U2 snRNPs represent distinct entities that may have monocot- and dicot-specific snRNP protein variants associated with each snRNA.     

Exon‐independent recruitment of SRSF1 is mediated by U1 snRNP stem‐loop 3

SRSF1 protein and U1 snRNPs are closely connected splicing factors. They both stimulate exon inclusion, SRSF1 by binding to exonic splicing enhancer sequences (ESEs) and U1 snRNPs by binding to the downstream 5′ splice site (SS), and both factors affect 5′ SS selection. The binding of U1 snRNPs initiates spliceosome assembly, but SR proteins such as SRSF1 can in some cases substitute for it. The mechanistic basis of this relationship is poorly understood. We show here by single‐molecule methods that a single molecule of SRSF1 can be recruited by a U1 snRNP. This reaction is independent of exon sequences and separate from the U1‐independent process of binding to an ESE. Structural analysis and cross‐linking data show that SRSF1 contacts U1 snRNA stem‐loop 3, which is required for splicing. We suggest that the recruitment of SRSF1 to a U1 snRNP at a 5′SS is the basis for exon definition by U1 snRNP and might be one of the principal functions of U1 snRNPs in the core reactions of splicing in mammals.     

Reconstituted U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex restores 5' splice site cleavage activity

Functional reconstitution of U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (U1 snRNP) was performed using in vitro transcribed U1 snRNA. Hela cell nuclear extract was depleted of its constituent snRNPs by centrifugation at 100,000 X g. The supernatant was devoid of snRNAs and lacked cleavage activity in splicing reactions using in vitro transcribed beta-globin pre-mRNA as substrate. The resulting pellet which contained the snRNAs, retained 5' splice site cleavage activity in a similar splicing reaction. Supplementation of the inactive supernatant fraction with in vitro transcribed U1 snRNA, partially restored 5' splice site cleavage activity thereby demonstrating the specific requirement of U1 snRNP in the initial stage of pre-mRNA splicing.     

In vitro reconstitution of mammalian U2 and U5 snRNPs active in splicing: Sm proteins are functionally interchangeable and are essential for the formation of functional U2 and U5 snRNPs.

An in vitro reconstitution/splicing complementation system has been developed which has allowed the investigation of the role of mammalian U2 and U5 snRNP components in splicing. U2 or U5 snRNP cores are first reconstituted from purified native snRNP core proteins and snRNA in the absence of cellular extract and are subsequently added to splicing extracts depleted of either U2 or U5 snRNP. When snRNPs reconstituted with HeLa U2 or U5 snRNA were added to U2- or U5-depleted nuclear extract, splicing was complemented. Addition of naked snRNA, on the other hand, did not restore splicing, demonstrating that the core proteins are essential for both U2 and U5 snRNP functions in splicing. Hybrid U2 or U5 snRNPs, reconstituted with core proteins isolated from U1 or U2 snRNPs, were equally active in splicing complementation, indicating that the snRNP core proteins are functionally interchangeable. U5 snRNPs reconstituted from in vitro transcribed U5 snRNA restored splicing to a level identical to that observed with particles reconstituted from authentic HeLa U5 snRNA. In contrast, splicing could not be restored to U2-depleted extract by the addition of snRNPs reconstituted from synthetic U2 snRNA, suggesting that U2 snRNA base modifications are essential for U2 snRNP function.     

U1 SnRNP association with HnRNP involves an initial non-specific splice-site independent interaction of U1 SnRNP protein with HnRNA

Precursor mRNA is complexed with proteins in the cell nucleus to form heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP), and these hnRNPs are found associated in vivo with small nuclear RNPs (snRNPs) for the processing of pre-mRNA. In order to better characterize the ATP-independent initial association of U1 snRNP with hnRNP, an important early event in assembly of the spliceosome complex, we have determined some of the components essential to an in vitro reassociation of U1 snRNP with hnRNP. U1 snRNP reassociated in vitro with 40S hnRNP particles from HeLa cells and, similar to the in vivo hnRNP/U1 snRNP association, the in vitro interaction was sensitive to high salt concentrations. U1 snRNP also associated with in vitro reconstituted hnRNP in which bacteriophage MS2 RNA, which lacks introns, was used as the RNA component. Purified snRNA alone would not associate with the MS2 RNA-reconstituted hnRNP, however, intact U1 snRNP did interact with protein-free MS2 RNA. This indicates that the U1 snRNP proteins are required for the hnRNP/U1 snRNP association, but hnRNP proteins are not. Thus, the initial, ATP-independent association of U1 snRNP with hnRNP seems to be mediated by U1 snRNP protein(s) associating with hnRNA without requiring a splice-site sequence. This complex may then be further stabilized by intron-specific interactions and hnRNP proteins, as well as by other snRNPs.     

Structural requirements for the function of a yeast chromosomal replicator

We have investigated the role of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) in the in vitro splicing of messenger RNA precursors by a variety of procedures. Removal of the U-type snRNPs from the nuclear extracts of HeLa cells with protein A-Sepharose-coupled human autoimmune antibodies leads to complete loss of splicing activity. The inhibition of splicing can be prevented by saturating the coupled antibodies with purified nucleoplasmic U snRNPs prior to incubation with nuclear extract. We further demonstrate that an intact 5' terminus of U1 snRNA is required for the functioning of U1 snRNP in the splicing reaction. Antibodies directed against the trimethylated cap structure of the U snRNAs inhibit splicing. Upon removal of the first eight nucleotides of the U1 snRNA in the particles by site-directed hydrolysis with ribonuclease H in the presence of a synthetic complementary oligodeoxynucleotide splicing is completely abolished. These results are in strong support of current models suggesting that a base-pairing interaction between the 5' terminus of the U1 snRNA and the 5' splice site of a mRNA precursor is a prerequisite for proper splicing.     

cDNA cloning of U1, U2, U4 and U5 snRNA families expressed in pea nuclei.

Differences observed between plant and animal pre-mRNA splicing may be the result of primary or secondary structure differences in small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs). A cDNA library of pea snRNAs was constructed from anti-trimethylguanosine (m3(2,2,7)G immunoprecipitated pea nuclear RNA. The cDNA library was screened using oligo-deoxyribonucleotide probes specific for the U1, U2, U4 and U5 snRNAs. cDNA clones representing U1, U2, U4 and U5 snRNAs expressed in seedling tissue have been isolated and sequenced. Comparison of the pea snRNA variants with other organisms suggest that functionally important primary sequences are conserved phylogenetically even though the overall sequences have diverged substantially. Structural variations in U1 snRNA occur in regions required for U1-specific protein binding. In light of this sequence analysis, it is clear that the dicot snRNA variants do not differ in sequences implicated in RNA:RNA interactions with pre-mRNA. Instead, sequence differences occur in regions implicated in the binding of small ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) to snRNAs and may result in the formation of unique snRNP particles.     

Evolutionary conservation of minor U12-type spliceosome between plants and humans

Splicing of rare, U12-type or AT-AC introns is mediated by a distinct spliceosome that assembles from U11, U12, U4atac, U6atac, and U5 snRNPs. Although in human cells the protein composition of minor and major snRNPs is similar, differences, particularly in U11 and U12 snRNPs, have been recently described. We have identified an Arabidopsis U11 snRNP-specific 35K protein as an interacting partner of an RS-domain-containing cyclophilin. By using a transient expression system in Arabidopsis protoplasts, we show that the 35K protein incorporates into snRNP. Oligo affinity selection and glycerol gradient centrifugation revealed that the Arabidopsis 35K protein is present in monomeric U11 snRNP and in U11/U12-di snRNP. The interaction of the 35K protein with Arabidopsis SR proteins together with its strong sequence similarity to U1-70K suggests that its function in splicing of minor introns is analogous to that of U1-70K. Analysis of Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa genome sequences revealed that all U11/U12-di-snRNP-specific proteins are conserved in dicot and monocot plants. In addition, we have identified an Arabidopsis gene encoding the homolog of U4atac snRNA and a second Arabidopsis gene encoding U6atac snRNA. Secondary structure predictions indicate that the Arabidopsis U4atac is able to form dimeric complexes with both Arabidopsis U6atac snRNAs. As revealed by RNaseA/T1 protection assay, the U4atac snRNA gene is expressed as an ~160-nt RNA, whereas the second U6atac snRNA gene seems to be a pseudogene. Taken together, our data indicate that recognition and splicing of minor, AT-AC introns in plants is highly similar to that in humans.     

Functional studies on the ATM intronic splicing processing element

In disease-associated genes, the understanding of the functional significance of deep intronic nucleotide variants may represent a difficult challenge. We have previously reported a new disease-causing mechanism that involves an intronic splicing processing element (ISPE) in ATM, composed of adjacent consensus 5′ and 3′ splice sites. A GTAA deletion within ISPE maintains potential adjacent splice sites, disrupts a non-canonical U1 snRNP interaction and activates an aberrant exon. In this paper, we demonstrate that binding of U1 snRNA through complementarity within a ~40 nt window downstream of the ISPE prevents aberrant splicing. By selective mutagenesis at the adjacent consensus ISPE splice sites, we show that this effect is not due to a resplicing process occurring at the ISPE. Functional comparison of the ATM mouse counterpart and evaluation of the pre-mRNA splicing intermediates derived from affected cell lines and hybrid minigene assays indicate that U1 snRNP binding at the ISPE interferes with the cryptic acceptor site. Activation of this site results in a stringent 5′–3′ order of intron sequence removal around the cryptic exon. Artificial U1 snRNA loading by complementarity to heterologous exonic sequences represents a potential therapeutic method to prevent the usage of an aberrant CFTR cryptic exon. Our results suggest that ISPE-like intronic elements binding U1 snRNPs may regulate correct intron processing.     

In vivo detection of snRNP-rich organelles in the nuclei of mammalian cells.

The in vivo distribution of snRNPs has been analysed by microinjecting fluorochrome-labelled antisense probes into the nuclei of live HeLa and 3T3 cells. Probes for U2 and U5 snRNAs specifically label the same discrete nuclear foci while a probe for U1 snRNA shows widespread nucleoplasmic labelling, excluding nucleoli, in addition to labelling foci. A probe for U3 snRNA specifically labels nucleoli. These in vivo data confirm that mammalian cells have nuclear foci which contain spliceosomal snRNPs. Co-localization studies, both in vivo and in situ, demonstrate that the spliceosomal snRNAs are present in the same nuclear foci. These foci are also stained by antibodies which recognize snRNP proteins, m3G-cap structures and the splicing factor U2AF but are not stained by anti-SC-35 or anti-La antibodies. U1 snRNP and the splicing factor U2AF closely co-localize in the nucleus, both before and after actinomycin D treatment, suggesting that they may both be part of the same complex in vivo.     

A 69-kD protein that associates reversibly with the Sm core domain of several spliceosomal snRNP species

The biogenesis of the spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) U1, U2, U4, and U5 involves: (a) migration of the snRNA molecules from the nucleus to the cytoplasm; (b) assembly of a group of common proteins (Sm proteins) and their binding to a region on the snRNAs called the Sm-binding site; and (c) translocation of the RNP back to the nucleus. A first prerequisite for understanding the assembly pathway and nuclear transport of the snRNPs in more detail is the knowledge of all the snRNP proteins that play essential roles in these processes. We have recently observed a previously undetected 69- kD protein in 12S U1 snRNPs isolated from HeLa nuclear extracts under non-denaturing conditions that is clearly distinct from the U1-70K protein. The following evidence indicates that the 69-kD protein is a common, rather than a U1-specific, protein, possibly associating with the snRNP core particles by protein-protein interaction. (a) Antibodies raised against the 69-kD protein, which did not cross-react with any of the Sm proteins B'-G, precipitated not only U1 snRNPs, but also the other spliceosomal snRNPs U2, U4/U6 and U5, albeit to a lower extent. (b) U1, U2, and U5 core RNP particles reconstituted in vitro contain the 69-kD protein. (c) Xenopus laevis oocytes contain an immunologically related homologue of the human 69-kD protein. When U1 snRNA as well as a mutant U1 snRNA, that can bind the Sm core proteins but lacks the capacity to bind the U1-specific proteins 70K, A, and C, were injected into Xenopus oocytes to allow assembly in vivo, they were recognized by antibodies specific against the 69-kD protein in the ooplasm and in the nucleus. The 69-kD protein is under-represented, if present at all, in purified 17S U2 and in 25S [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNPs, isolated from HeLa nuclear extracts. Our results are consistent with the working hypothesis that this protein may either play a role in the cytoplasmic assembly of the core domain of the snRNPs and/or in the nuclear transport of the snRNPs. After transport of the snRNPs into the nucleus, it may dissociate from the particles as for example in the case of the 17S U2 or the 25S [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP, which bind more than 10 different snRNP specific proteins each in the nucleus.     

Structurally related but functionally distinct yeast Sm D core small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle proteins.

Spliceosome assembly during pre-mRNA splicing requires the correct positioning of the U1, U2, U4/U6, and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) on the precursor mRNA. The structure and integrity of these snRNPs are maintained in part by the association of the snRNAs with core snRNP (Sm) proteins. The Sm proteins also play a pivotal role in metazoan snRNP biogenesis. We have characterized a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene, SMD3, that encodes the core snRNP protein Smd3. The Smd3 protein is required for pre-mRNA splicing in vivo. Depletion of this protein from yeast cells affects the levels of U snRNAs and their cap modification, indicating that Smd3 is required for snRNP biogenesis. Smd3 is structurally and functionally distinct from the previously described yeast core polypeptide Smd1. Although Smd3 and Smd1 are both associated with the spliceosomal snRNPs, overexpression of one cannot compensate for the loss of the other. Thus, these two proteins have distinct functions. A pool of Smd3 exists in the yeast cytoplasm. This is consistent with the possibility that snRNP assembly in S. cerevisiae, as in metazoans, is initiated in the cytoplasm from a pool of RNA-free core snRNP protein complexes.     

5'-terminal caps of snRNAs are accessible for reaction with 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine-specific antibody in intact snRNPs

Immune precipitation assays with antibodies specific for 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine (m2,2,7(3)G) have been used to study the accessibility of the 5'-terminal m2,2,7(3)G-containing caps of eucaryotic small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) either as naked RNAs or in intact small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNPs). The antibody selectively precipitates snRNA species U1a, U1b, U2, U4, and U5 from total deproteinized RNA isolated from Ehrlich ascites cells. Binding by the antibody occurs via the m2,2,7(3)G moiety of the snRNAs' caps, since complex formation with the antibody can be completely abolished by excess nucleoside m2,2,7(3)G. The specificity of the antibody is further demonstrated by the complete absence of reaction with deproteinized snRNA species U6, the 5' terminus of which does not contain m2,2,7(3)G. Most importantly, the cap structures of the snRNAs U1a, U1b, U2, U4, and U5 are also accessible for anti-m2,2,7(3)G IgGs when intact snRNPs are reacted with the antibody. In this case, snRNP species U6 is coprecipitated, suggesting that there are intermolecular interactions between this and other snRNPs. Our data demonstrate that the 5'-terminal regions of the above snRNAs are not protected by the snRNP proteins. This finding is of special interest for snRNP species U1, and is discussed in terms of a model which proposes that the 5'-terminal region of U1 participates in the proper alignment of splice junctions in eucaryotic pre-mRNAs (Lerner, M. R., Boyle, J.A., Mount, S.M., Wolin, S.L., and Steitz, J. A. (1980) Nature (Lond.) 283, 220-224).     

Biochemical and genetic analyses of the U5, U6, and U4/U6 x U5 small nuclear ribonucleoproteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

We have purified the yeast U5 and U6 pre-mRNA splicing small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) by affinity chromatography and analyzed the associated polypeptides by mass spectrometry. The yeast U5 snRNP is composed of the two variants of U5 snRNA, six U5-specific proteins and the 7 proteins of the canonical Sm core. The U6 snRNP is composed of the U6 snRNA, Prp24, and the 7 Sm-Like (LSM) proteins. Surprisingly, the yeast DEAD-box helicase-like protein Prp28 is stably associated with the U5 snRNP, yet is absent from the purified U4/U6 x U5 snRNP. A novel yeast U5 and four novel yeast U4/U6 x U5 snRNP polypeptides were characterized by genetic and biochemical means to demonstrate their involvement in the pre-mRNA splicing reaction. We also show that, unlike the human tri-snRNP, the yeast tri-snRNP dissociated upon addition of ATP or dATP.     

The association of the U1-specific 70K and C proteins with U1 snRNPs is mediated in part by common U snRNP proteins.

The U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP)-specific 70K and A proteins are known to bind directly to stem-loops of the U1 snRNA, whereas the U1-C protein does not bind to naked U1 snRNA, but depends on other U1 snRNP protein components for its association. Focusing on the U1-70K and U1-C proteins, protein-protein interactions contributing to the association of these particle-specific proteins with the U1 snRNP were studied. Immunoprecipitation of complexes formed after incubation of naked U1 snRNA or purified U1 snRNPs lacking their specific proteins (core U1 snRNP) with in vitro translated U1-C protein, revealed that both common snRNP proteins and the U1-70K protein are required for the association of U1-C with the U1 snRNP. Binding studies with various in vitro translated U1-70K mutants demonstrated that the U1-70K N-terminal domain is necessary and sufficient for the interaction of U1-C with core U1 snRNPs. Surprisingly, several N-terminal fragments of the U1-70K protein, which lacked the U1-70K RNP-80 motif and did not bind naked U1 RNA, associated stably with core U1 snRNPs. This suggests that a new U1-70K binding site is generated upon association of common U1 snRNP proteins with U1 RNA. The interaction between the N-terminal domain of U1-70K and the core RNP domain was specific for the U1 snRNP; stable binding was not observed with core U2 or U5 snRNPs, suggesting essential structural differences among snRNP core domains. Evidence for direct protein-protein interactions between U1-specific proteins and common snRNP proteins was supported by chemical crosslinking experiments using purified U1 snRNPs. Individual crosslinks between the U1-70K and the common D2 or B'/B protein, as well as between U1-C and B'/B, were detected. A model for the assembly of U1 snRNP is presented in which the complex of common proteins on the RNA backbone functions as a platform for the association of the U1-specific proteins.     

Sequence-specific interaction of U1 snRNA with the SMN complex

The survival of motor neurons (SMN) protein complex functions in the biogenesis of spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) and prob ably other RNPs. All spliceosomal snRNPs have a common core of seven Sm proteins. To mediate the assembly of snRNPs, the SMN complex must be able to bring together Sm proteins with U snRNAs. We showed previously that SMN and other components of the SMN complex interact directly with several Sm proteins. Here, we show that the SMN complex also interacts specifically with U1 snRNA. The stem--loop 1 domain of U1 (SL1) is necessary and sufficient for SMN complex binding in vivo and in vitro. Substitution of three nucleotides in the SL1 loop (SL1A3) abolishes SMN interaction, and the corresponding U1 snRNA (U1A3) is impaired in U1 snRNP biogenesis. Microinjection of excess SL1 but not SL1A3 into Xenopus oocytes inhibits SMN complex binding to U1 snRNA and U1 snRNP assembly. These findings indicate that SMN complex interaction with SL1 is sequence-specific and critical for U1 snRNP biogenesis, further supporting the direct role of the SMN complex in RNP biogenesis.