LRP5 negatively regulates differentiation of monocytes through abrogation of Wnt signalling

Molecular changes involved in cell differentiation are only partially known. Circulating inflammatory cells need to differentiate to perform specialized functions in target tissues. Here, we hypothesized that low‐density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 5 (LRP5) is involved, through its participation in the canonical Wnt/β‐catenin signalling, in the differentiation process of monocytic cells. To this aim, we characterized differentiation mechanisms of HL60 cells and primary human monocytes. We show that silencing the LRP5 gene increased differentiation of HL60 cells and human monocytes, suggesting that LRP5 signalling abrogates differentiation. We demonstrate that the mechanisms behind this blockade include sequestration of β‐catenin at the cellular membrane, inhibition of the Wnt signalling and increase of apoptosis. We further demonstrate the involvement of LRP5 and the Wnt/β‐catenin signalling in the process because cellular differentiation can be rescued by the addition of downstream Wnt target genes to the monocytic cells.     

Tyrosine phosphorylation of LRP6 by Src and Fer inhibits Wnt/β‐catenin signalling

Low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related proteins 5 and 6 (LRP5/6) function as transmembrane receptors to transduce Wnt signals. A key mechanism for signalling is Wnt‐induced serine/threonine phosphorylation at conserved PPPSPxS motifs in the LRP6 cytoplasmic domain, which promotes pathway activation. Conserved tyrosine residues are positioned close to all PPPSPxS motifs, which suggests they have a functional significance. Using a cell culture‐based cDNA expression screen, we identified the non‐receptor tyrosine kinases Src and Fer as novel LRP6 modifiers. Both Src and Fer associate with LRP6 and phosphorylate LRP6 directly. In contrast to the known PPPSPxS Ser/Thr kinases, tyrosine phosphorylation by Src and Fer negatively regulates LRP6‐Wnt signalling. Epistatically, they function upstream of β‐catenin to inhibit signalling and in agreement with a negative role in regulating LRP6, MEF cells lacking these kinases show enhanced Wnt signalling. Wnt3a treatment of cells enhances tyrosine phosphorylation of endogenous LRP6 and, mechanistically, Src reduces cell surface LRP6 levels and disrupts LRP6 signalosome formation. Interestingly, CK1γ inhibits Fer‐induced LRP6 phosphorylation, suggesting a mechanism whereby CK1γ acts to de‐represses inhibitory LRP6 tyrosine phosphorylation. We propose that LRP6 tyrosine phosphorylation by Src and Fer serves a negative regulatory function to prevent over‐activation of Wnt signalling at the level of the Wnt receptor, LRP6.     

LRP5 promotes cancer stem cell traits and chemoresistance in colorectal cancer

The overactivation of canonical Wnt/β‐catenin pathway and the maintenance of cancer stem cells (CSCs) are essential for the onset and malignant progression of most human cancers. However, their regulatory mechanism in colorectal cancer (CRC) has not yet been well demonstrated. Low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein 5 (LRP5) has been identified as an indispensable co‐receptor with frizzled family members for the canonical Wnt/β‐catenin signal transduction. Herein, we show that activation of LRP5 gene promotes CSCs‐like phenotypes, including tumorigenicity and drug resistance in CRC cells, through activating the canonical Wnt/β‐catenin and IL‐6/STAT3 signalling pathways. Clinically, the expression of LRP5 is upregulated in human CRC tissues and closely associated with clinical stages of patients with CRC. Further analysis showed silencing of endogenous LRP5 gene is sufficient to suppress the CSCs‐like phenotypes of CRC through inhibiting these two pathways. In conclusion, our findings not only reveal a regulatory cross‐talk between canonical Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway, IL‐6/STAT3 signalling pathway and CD133‐related stemness that promote the malignant behaviour of CRC, but also provide a valuable target for the diagnosis and treatment of CRC.     

LGR5 regulates osteogenic differentiation of human thoracic ligamentum flavum cells by Wnt signalling pathway

Thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (TOLF) is ectopic ossification of the spinal ligaments. Histologically, the development of TOLF can be described as the process of endochondral ossification. However, the underlying aetiology has not been completely clarified. In this investigation, the gene expression profile associated with leucine‐rich repeat‐containing G‐protein‐coupled receptors (LGR) and Wnt signalling pathway in the thoracic ligamentum flavum cells (TLFCs) of different ossification stages was analysed via RNA sequencing. We further confirmed the significant differences in the related gene expression profile by Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis. LGR5 was first identified in primary human TLFCs during osteogenic differentiation. To evaluate the effect of LGR5 on osteogenic differentiation, LGR5 has been knocked down and overexpressed in human TLFCs. We observed that the knockdown of LGR5 inhibited the activity of Wnt signalling and attenuated the potential osteogenic differentiation of TLFCs, while overexpression of LGR5 activated the Wnt signalling pathway and increased osteogenic differentiation. Our results provide important evidence for the potent positive mediatory effects of LGR5 on osteogenesis by enhancing the Wnt signalling pathway in TOLF.     

Caveolin‐1 down‐regulation is required for Wnt5a‐Frizzled 2 signalling in Ha‐RasV12‐induced cell transformation

Caveolin‐1 (Cav1) is down‐regulated during MK4 (MDCK cells harbouring inducible Ha‐Ras^V12 gene) transformation by Ha‐Ras^V12. Cav1 overexpression abrogates the Ha‐Ras^V12‐driven transformation of MK4 cells; however, the targeted down‐regulation of Cav1 is not sufficient to mimic this transformation. Cav1‐silenced cells, including MK4/shCav1 cells and MDCK/shCav1 cells, showed an increased cell area and discontinuous junction‐related proteins staining. Cellular and mechanical transformations were completed when MDCK/shCav1 cells were treated with medium conditioned by MK4 cells treated with IPTG (MK4+I‐CM) but not with medium conditioned by MK4 cells. Nanoparticle tracking analysis showed that Ha‐Ras^V12‐inducing MK4 cells increased exosome‐like microvesicles release compared with their normal counterparts. The cellular and mechanical transformation activities of MK4+I‐CM were abolished after heat treatment and exosome depletion and were copied by exosomes derived from MK4+I‐CM (MK4+I‐EXs). Wnt5a, a downstream product of Ha‐Ras^V12, was markedly secreted by MK4+I‐CM and MK4+I‐EXs. Suppression of Wnt5a expression and secretion using the porcupine inhibitor C59 or Wnt5a siRNA inhibited the Ha‐Ras^V12‐ and MK4+I‐CM‐induced transformation of MK4 cells and MDCK/shCav1 cells, respectively. Cav1 down‐regulation, either by Ha‐Ras^V12 or targeted shRNA, increased frizzled‐2 (Fzd2) protein levels without affecting its mRNA levels, suggesting a novel role of Cav1 in negatively regulating Fzd2 expression. Additionally, silencing Cav1 facilitated the internalization of MK4+I‐EXs in MDCK cells. These data suggest that Cav1‐dependent repression of Fzd2 and exosome uptake is potentially relevant to its antitransformation activity, which hinders the activation of Ha‐Ras^V12‐Wnt5a‐Stat3 pathway. Altogether, these results suggest that both decreasing Cav1 and increasing exosomal Wnt5a must be implemented during Ha‐Ras^V12‐driven cell transformation.     

Both LRP5 and LRP6 receptors are required to respond to physiological Wnt ligands in mammary epithelial cells and fibroblasts

A canonical Wnt signal maintains adult mammary ductal stem cell activity, and this signal requires the Wnt signaling reception, LRP5. However, previous data from our laboratory have shown that LRP5 and LRP6 are co-expressed in mammary basal cells and that LRP6 is active, leading us to question why LRP6 is insufficient to mediate canonical signaling in the absence of LRP5. Here, we show that at endogenous levels of LRP5 and LRP6 both receptors are required to signal in response to some Wnt ligands both in vitro (in mouse embryonic fibroblasts and mammary epithelial cells) and in vivo (in mammary outgrowths). This subgroup of canonical ligands includes Wnt1, Wnt9b, and Wnt10b; the latter two are expressed in mammary gland. In contrast, the ligand commonly used experimentally, Wnt3a, prefers LRP6 and requires just one receptor regardless of cellular context. When either LRP5 or LRP6 is overexpressed, signaling remains ligand-dependent, but the requirement for both receptors is abrogated (regardless of ligand type). We have documented an LRP5-6 heteromer using immiscible filtration assisted by surface tension (IFAST) immunoprecipitation. Together, our data imply that under physiological conditions some Wnt ligands require both receptors to be present to generate a canonical signal. We have designed a model to explain our results based on the resistance of LRP5-6 heteromers to a selective inhibitor of E1/2-binding Wnt-LRP6 interaction. These data have implications for stem cell biology and for the analysis of the oncogenicity of LRP receptors that are often overexpressed in breast tumors.     

microRNA‐128‐3p overexpression inhibits breast cancer stem cell characteristics through suppression of Wnt signalling pathway by down‐regulating NEK2

Emerging evidence has reported that dysregulation of microRNAs (miRNAs) participated in the development of diverse types of cancers. Our initial microarray‐based analysis identified differentially expressed NEK2 related to breast cancer and predicted the regulatory microRNA‐128‐3p (miR‐128‐3p). Herein, this study aimed to characterize the tumour‐suppressive role of miR‐128‐3p in regulating the biological characteristics of breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs). CD44^＋CD24^?/low cells were selected for subsequent experiments. After verification of the target relationship between miR‐128‐3p and NEK2, the relationship among miR‐128‐3p, NEK2 and BCSCs was further investigated with the involvement of the Wnt signalling pathway. The regulatory effects of miR‐128‐3p on proliferation, migration, invasion and self‐renewal in vitro as well as tumorigenicity in vivo of BCSCs were examined via gain‐ and loss‐of‐function approaches. Highly expressed NEK2 was found in breast cancer based on GSE61304 expression profile. Breast cancer stem cells and breast cancer cells showed a down‐regulation of miR‐128‐3p. Overexpression of miR‐128‐3p was found to inhibit proliferation, migration, invasion, self‐renewal in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo of BCSCs, which was further validated to be achieved through inhibition of Wnt signalling pathway by down‐regulating NEK2. In summary, this study indicates that miR‐128‐3p inhibits the stem‐like cell features of BCSCs via inhibition of the Wnt signalling pathway by down‐regulating NEK2, which provides a new target for breast cancer treatment.     

Aging differentially modulates the Wnt pro‐survival signalling pathways in vascular smooth muscle cells

We previously reported pro‐survival effects of Wnt3a and Wnt5a proteins in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Wnt5a achieved this through induction of Wnt1‐inducible signalling pathway protein‐1 (WISP‐1) consequent to β‐catenin/CREB‐dependent, TCF‐independent, signalling. However, we found that as atherosclerosis advances, although Wnt5a protein was increased, WISP‐1 was reduced. We hypothesized this disconnect could be due to aging. In this study, we elucidate the mechanism underlying Wnt3a pro‐survival signalling and demonstrate the differential effect of age on Wnt3a‐ and Wnt5a‐mediated survival. We show Wnt3a protein was expressed in human atherosclerotic coronary arteries and co‐located with macrophages and VSMCs. Meanwhile, Wnt3a stimulation of primary mouse VSMCs increased β‐catenin nuclear translocation and TCF, but not CREB, activation. Wnt3a increased mRNA expression of the pro‐survival factor WISP‐2 in a TCF‐dependent manner. Functionally, β‐catenin/TCF inhibition or WISP‐2 neutralization significantly impaired Wnt3a‐mediated VSMC survival. WISP‐2 was upregulated in human atherosclerosis and partly co‐localized with Wnt3a. The pro‐survival action of Wnt3a was effective in VSMCs from young (2 month) and old (18–20 month) mice, whereas Wnt5a‐mediated rescue was impaired with age. Further investigation revealed that although Wnt5a induced β‐catenin nuclear translocation in VSMCs from both ages, CREB phosphorylation and WISP‐1 upregulation did not occur in old VSMCs. Unlike Wnt5a, pro‐survival Wnt3a signalling involves β‐catenin/TCF and WISP‐2. While Wnt3a‐mediated survival was unchanged with age, Wnt5a‐mediated survival was lost due to impaired CREB activation and WISP‐1 regulation. Greater understanding of the effect of age on Wnt signalling may identify targets to promote VSMC survival in elderly patients with atherosclerosis.     

MicroRNA‐140‐5p elevates cerebral protection of dexmedetomidine against hypoxic–ischaemic brain damage via the Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway

Hypoxia–ischaemia (HI) remains a major cause of foetal brain damage presented a scarcity of effective therapeutic approaches. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) and microRNA‐140‐5p (miR‐140‐5p) have been highlighted due to its potentially significant role in the treatment of cerebral ischaemia. This study was to investigate the role by which miR‐140‐5p provides cerebral protection using DEX to treat hypoxic–ischaemic brain damage (HIBD) in neonatal rats via the Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway. The HIBD rat models were established and allocated into various groups with different treatment plans, and eight SD rats into sham group. The learning and memory ability of the rats was assessed. Apoptosis and pathological changes in the hippocampus CA1 region and expressions of the related genes of the Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway as well as the genes responsible of apoptosis were detected. Compared with the sham group, the parameters of weight, length growth, weight ratio between hemispheres, the rate of reaching standard, as well as Bcl‐2 expressions, were all increased. Furthermore, observations of increased levels of cerebral infarction volume, total mortality rate, response times, total response duration, expressions of Wnt1, β‐catenin, TCF‐4, E‐cadherin, apoptosis rate of neurons, and Bax expression were elevated. Following DEX treatment, the symptoms exhibited by HIBD rats were ameliorated. miR‐140‐5p and si‐Wnt1 were noted to attenuate the progression of HIBD. Our study demonstrates that miR‐140‐5p promotes the cerebral protective effects of DEX against HIBD in neonatal rats by targeting the Wnt1 gene through via the negative regulation of the Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway.     

A cell‐based Dkk1 binding assay reveals roles for extracellular domains of LRP5 in Dkk1 interaction and highlights differences between wild‐type and the high bone mass mutant LRP5(G171V)

Dkk1 is a secreted antagonist of the LRP5‐mediated Wnt signaling pathway that plays a pivotal role in bone biology. Because there are no well‐documented LRP5‐based assays of Dkk1 binding, we developed a cell‐based assay of Dkk1/LRP5 binding using radioactive ¹²⁵I‐Dkk1. In contrast to LRP6, transfection of LRP5 alone into 293A cells resulted in a low level of specific binding that was unsuitable for routine assay. However, co‐transfection of LRP5 with the chaperone protein MesD (which itself does not bind Dkk1) or Kremen‐2 (a known Dkk1 receptor), or both, resulted in a marked enhancement of specific binding that was sufficient for evaluation of Dkk1 antagonists. LRP5 fragments comprising the third and fourth β‐propellers plus the ligand binding domain, or the first β‐propeller, each inhibited Dkk1 binding, with mean IC₅₀s of 10 and 196 nM, respectively. The extracellular domain of Kremen‐2 (“soluble Kremen”) was a weaker antagonist (mean IC₅₀ 806 nM). We also found that cells transfected with a high bone mass mutation LRP5(G171V) had a subtly reduced level of Dkk1 binding, compared to wild type LRP5‐transfected cells, and no enhancement of binding by MesD. We conclude that (1) LRP5‐transfected cells do not offer a suitable cell‐based Dkk1 binding assay, unless co‐transfected with either MesD, Kremen‐2, or both; (2) soluble fragments of LRP5 containing either the third and fourth β‐propellers plus the ligand binding domain, or the first β‐propeller, antagonize Dkk1 binding; and (3) a high bone mass mutant LRP5(G171V), has subtly reduced Dkk1 binding, and, in contrast to LRP5, no enhancement of binding with MesD. J. Cell. Biochem. 108: 1066–1075, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

β‐arrestin1 phosphorylation by GRK5 regulates G protein‐independent 5‐HT4 receptor signalling

G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been found to trigger G protein‐independent signalling. However, the regulation of G protein‐independent pathways, especially their desensitization, is poorly characterized. Here, we show that the G protein‐independent 5‐HT₄ receptor (5‐HT₄R)‐operated Src/ERK (extracellular signal‐regulated kinase) pathway, but not the G_s pathway, is inhibited by GPCR kinase 5 (GRK5), physically associated with the proximal region of receptor’ C‐terminus in both human embryonic kidney (HEK)‐293 cells and colliculi neurons. This inhibition required two sequences of events: the association of β–arrestin1 to a phosphorylated serine/threonine cluster located within the receptor C‐t domain and the phosphorylation, by GRK5, of β–arrestin1 (at Ser⁴¹²) bound to the receptor. Phosphorylated β‐arrestin1 in turn prevented activation of Src constitutively bound to 5‐HT₄Rs, a necessary step in receptor‐stimulated ERK signalling. This is the first demonstration that β‐arrestin1 phosphorylation by GRK5 regulates G protein‐independent signalling.     

Cross-talk between insulin and Wnt signaling in preadipocytes: role of Wnt co-receptor low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-5 (LRP5)

Disturbed Wnt signaling has been implicated in numerous diseases, including type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. In the present study, we have investigated cross-talk between insulin and Wnt signaling pathways using preadipocytes with and without knockdown of the Wnt co-receptors LRP5 and LRP6 and with and without knock-out of insulin and IGF-1 receptors. We find that Wnt stimulation leads to phosphorylation of insulin signaling key mediators, including Akt, GSK3β, and ERK1/2, although with a lower fold stimulation and slower time course than observed for insulin. These Wnt effects are insulin/IGF-1 receptor-dependent and are lost in insulin/IGF-1 receptor double knock-out cells. Conversely, in LRP5 knockdown preadipocytes, insulin-induced phosphorylation of IRS1, Akt, GSK3β, and ERK1/2 is highly reduced. This effect is specific to insulin, as compared with IGF-1, stimulation and appears to be due to an inducible interaction between LRP5 and the insulin receptor as demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation. These data demonstrate that Wnt and insulin signaling pathways exhibit cross-talk at multiple levels. Wnt induces phosphorylation of Akt, ERK1/2, and GSK3β, and this is dependent on insulin/IGF-1 receptors. Insulin signaling also involves the Wnt co-receptor LRP5, which has a positive effect on insulin signaling. Thus, altered Wnt and LRP5 activity can serve as modifiers of insulin action and insulin resistance in the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome.     

Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway mediated aberrant hippocampal neurogenesis in kainic acid‐induced epilepsy

Temporal lobe epilepsy is a chronic disorder of nerve system, mainly characterized by hippocampal sclerosis with massive neuronal loss and severe gliosis. Aberrant neurogenesis has been shown in the epileptogenesis process of temporal lobe epilepsy. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying aberrant neurogenesis remain unclear. The roles of Wnt signalling cascade have been well established in neurogenesis during multiple aspects. Here, we used kainic acid‐induced rat epilepsy model to investigate whether Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway is involved in the aberrant neurogenesis in temporal lobe epilepsy. Immunostaining and western blotting results showed that the expression levels of β‐catenin, Wnt3a, and cyclin D1, the key regulators in Wnt signalling pathway, were up‐regulated during acute epilepsy induced by the injection of kainic acids, indicating that Wnt signalling pathway was activated in kainic acid‐induced temporal lobe epilepsy. Moreover, BrdU labelling results showed that blockade of the Wnt signalling by knocking down β‐catenin attenuated aberrant neurogenesis induced by kainic acids injection. Altogether, Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway mediated hippocampal neurogenesis during epilepsy, which might provide new strategies for clinical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy. Temporal lobe epilepsy is a chronic disorder of nerve system, mainly characterized by hippocampal sclerosis. Aberrant neurogenesis has been shown to involve in the epileptogenesis process of temporal lobe epilepsy. In the present study, we discovered that Wnt3a/β‐catenin signalling pathway serves as a link between aberrant neurogenesis and underlying remodelling in the hippocampus, leading to temporal lobe epilepsy, which might provide new strategies for clinical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy.     

Wnt5A promotes an adaptive,senescent‐like stress response,while continuing to drive invasion in melanoma cells

We have previously shown that Wnt5A drives invasion in melanoma. We have also shown that Wnt5A promotes resistance to therapy designed to target the BRAF^V600E mutation in melanoma. Here, we show that melanomas characterized by high levels of Wnt5A respond to therapeutic stress by increasing p21 and expressing classical markers of senescence, including positivity for senescence‐associated β‐galactosidase (SA‐β‐gal), senescence‐associated heterochromatic foci (SAHF), H3K9Me chromatin marks, and PML bodies. We find that despite this, these cells retain their ability to migrate and invade. Further, despite the expression of classic markers of senescence such as SA‐β‐gal and SAHF, these Wnt5A‐high cells are able to colonize the lungs in in vivo tail vein colony‐forming assays. This clearly underscores the fact that these markers do not indicate true senescence in these cells, but instead an adaptive stress response that allows the cells to evade therapy and invade. Notably, silencing Wnt5A reduces expression of these markers and decreases invasiveness. The combined data point to Wnt5A as a master regulator of an adaptive stress response in melanoma, which may contribute to therapy resistance.