Naive CD8+ T cells do not require costimulation for proliferation and differentiation into cytotoxic effector cells

Most current models of T cell activation postulate a requirement for two distinct signals. One signal is delivered through the TCR by engagement with peptide/MHC complexes, and the second is delivered by interaction between costimulatory molecules such as CD28 and its ligands CD80 and CD86. Soluble peptide/MHC tetramers provide an opportunity to test whether naive CD8+ T cells can be activated via the signal generated through the TCR-alphabeta in the absence of any potential costimulatory molecules. Using T cells from two different TCR transgenic mice in vitro, we find that TCR engagement by peptide/MHC tetramers is sufficient for the activation of naive CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, these T cells proliferate, produce cytokines, and differentiate into cytolytic effectors. Under the conditions where anti-CD28 is able to enhance proliferation of normal B6 CD4+, CD8+, and TCR transgenic CD8+ T cells with anti-CD3, we see no effect of anti-CD28 on proliferation induced by tetramers. The results of this experiment argue that given a strong signal delivered through the TCR by an authentic ligand, no costimulation is required.     

CD28 is not required for c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation in T cells.

Studies in Jurkat cells have shown that combined stimulation through the TCR and CD28 is required for activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), suggesting that JNK activity may mediate the costimulatory function of CD28. To examine the role of JNK signaling in CD28 costimulation in normal T cells, murine T cell clones and CD28(+/+) or CD28(-/-) TCR transgenic T cells were used. Although ligation with anti-CD28 mAb augmented JNK activation in Th1 and Th2 clones stimulated with low concentrations of anti-CD3 mAb, higher concentrations of anti-CD3 mAb alone were sufficient for JNK activation even in the absence of anti-CD28. JNK activity was comparably induced in both CD28(+/+) and CD28(-/-) 2C/recombinase-activating gene 2(RAG2)(-/-) T cells stimulated with anti-CD3 mAb alone, and with L(d)/peptide dimers, a direct alphabeta TCR ligand. Moreover, JNK activation was also detected in 2C/RAG2(-/-) T cells stimulated with P815 cells that express the relevant alloantigen L(d) whether or not B7-1 was coexpressed. However, IL-2 production by both Th1 clones and CD28(+/+) 2C/RAG2(-/-) T cells was detected only upon TCR and CD28 coengagement. Thus, CD28 coligation is not necessary, and stimulation through the TCR is sufficient, for JNK activation in normal murine T cells. The concept that JNK mediates the costimulatory function of CD28 needs to be reconsidered.     

Critical role of OX40 in CD28 and CD154-independent rejection

Blocking both CD28 and CD154 costimulatory pathways can induce transplant tolerance in some, but not all, transplant models. Under stringent conditions, however, this protocol often completely fails to block allograft rejection. The precise nature of such CD28/CD154 blockade-resistant rejection is largely unknown. In the present study we developed a new model in which both CD28 and CD154, two conventional T cell costimulatory molecules, are genetically knocked out (i.e., CD28/CD154 double-knockout (DKO) mice) and used this model to examine the role of novel costimulatory molecule-inducible costimulator (ICOS), OX40, 4-1BB, and CD27 in mediating CD28/CD154-independent rejection. We found that CD28/CD154 DKO mice vigorously rejected fully MHC-mismatched DBA/2 skin allografts (mean survival time, 12 days; n = 6) compared with the wild-type controls (mean survival time, 8 days; n = 7). OX40 costimulation is critically important in skin allograft rejection in this model, as blocking the OX40/OX40 ligand pathway, but not the ICOS/ICOS ligand, 4-1BB/4-1BBL, or CD27/CD70 pathway, markedly prolonged skin allograft survival in CD28/CD154 DKO mice. The critical role of OX40 costimulation in CD28/CD154-independent rejection is further confirmed in wild-type C57BL/6 mice, as blocking the OX40/OX40 ligand pathway in combination with CD28/CD154 blockade induced long term skin allograft survival (>100 days; n = 5). Our study revealed a key cellular mechanism of rejection and identified OX40 as a critical alternative costimulatory molecule in CD28/CD154-independent rejection.     

Immature CD4+CD8+ thymocytes do not polarize lipid rafts in response to TCR-mediated signals

TCR-mediated stimulation induces activation and proliferation of mature T cells. When accompanied by signals through the costimulatory receptor CD28, TCR signals also result in the recruitment of cholesterol- and glycosphingolipid-rich membrane microdomains (lipid rafts), which are known to contain several molecules important for T cell signaling. Interestingly, immature CD4(+)CD8(+) thymocytes respond to TCR/CD28 costimulation not by proliferating, but by dying. In this study, we report that, although CD4(+)CD8(+) thymocytes polarize their actin cytoskeleton, they fail to recruit lipid rafts to the site of TCR/CD28 costimulation. We show that coupling of lipid raft mobilization to cytoskeletal reorganization can be mediated by phosphoinositide 3-kinase, and discuss the relevance of these findings to the interpretation of TCR signals by immature vs mature T cells.     

SVR angiosarcomas can be rejected by CD4 costimulation dependent and CD8 costimulation independent pathways

PURPOSE: We wished to determine whether virally- induced endothelial tumors are rejected by CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes, and whether there are differences in requirements for costimulation in the rejection of these tumors by lymphocyte subsets. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We have developed a model of endothelial tumorigenesis through the sequential introduction of SV40 large T antigen and oncogenic H-ras into endothelial cells. These cells (SVR cells) form highly aggressive angiosarcomas in immunocompromised mice, but do not grow in syngeneic C57BL/6 mice. Using both acute blockade with systemic administration of antibodies and mice genetically deficient in the costimulatory molecules CD28, CD40, and CD40L, we have delineated the requirements of costimulation required to reject this virally-induced endothelial tumor. RESULTS: Control of SVR angiosarcoma is mediated through T lymphocytes, and both CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes are capable of controlling SVR angiosarcoma growth in vivo. Mice genetically deficient in CD28, CD40, and CD40L were able to reject SVR tumors, but depletion of these mice of CD8, but not CD4 cells led to rapid tumor growth. This data suggests that CD4 mediated rejection has a greater dependence of costimulation than CD8 mediated rejection. Surprisingly, acute depletion of costimulatory molecules in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice led to rapid tumor growth. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist in the immune status of mice acutely depleted of costimulatory molecules versus genetically deficient mice. Our results suggest that acute depletion is more immunosuppressive than genetic depletion. Humans who undergo costimulatory blockade may require periodic surveillance for virally-induced tumors.     

Signals from CD28 induce stable epigenetic modification of the IL-2 promoter

CD28 costimulation controls multiple aspects of T cell function, including the expression of proinflammatory cytokine genes. One of these genes encodes IL-2, a growth factor that influences T cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation. Antigenic signaling in the absence of CD28 costimulation leads to anergy, a mechanism of tolerance that renders CD4+ T cells unable to produce IL-2. The molecular mechanisms by which CD28 costimulatory signals induce gene expression are not fully understood. In eukaryotic cells, the expression of many genes is influenced by their physical structure at the level of DNA methylation and local chromatin remodeling. To address whether these epigenetic mechanisms are operative during CD28-dependent gene expression in CD4+ T cells, we compared cytosine methylation and chromatin structure at the IL-2 locus in fully activated CD4+ effector T cells and CD4+ T cells rendered anergic by TCR ligation in the absence of CD28 costimulation. Costimulation through CD28 led to marked, stable histone acetylation and loss of cytosine methylation at the IL-2 promoter/enhancer. This was accompanied by extensive remodeling of the chromatin in this region to a structure highly accessible to DNA binding proteins. Conversely, TCR activation in the absence of CD28 costimulation was not sufficient to promote histone acetylation or cytosine demethylation, and the IL-2 promoter/enhancer in anergic cells remained completely inaccessible. These data suggest that CD28 may function through epigenetic mechanisms to promote CD4+ T cell responses.     

Non-CD28 costimulatory molecules present in T cell rafts induce T cell costimulation by enhancing the association of TCR with rafts

While CD28 functions as the major T cell costimulatory receptor, a number of other T cell molecules have also been described to induce T cell costimulation. Here, we investigated the mechanisms by which costimulatory molecules other than CD28 contribute to T cell activation. Non-CD28 costimulatory molecules such as CD5, CD9, CD2, and CD44 were present in the detergent-insoluble glycolipid-enriched (DIG) fraction/raft of the T cell surface, which is rich in TCR signaling molecules and generates a TCR signal upon recruitment of the TCR complex. Compared with CD3 ligation, coligation of CD3 and CD5 as an example of DIG-resident costimulatory molecules led to an enhanced association of CD3 and DIG. Such a DIG redistribution markedly up-regulated TCR signaling as observed by ZAP-70/LAT activation and Ca2+ influx. Disruption of DIG structure using an agent capable of altering cholesterol organization potently diminished Ca2+ mobilization induced by the coligation of CD3 and CD5. This was associated with the inhibition of the redistribution of DIG although the association of CD3 and CD5 was not affected. Thus, the DIG-resident costimulatory molecules exert their costimulatory effects by contributing to an enhanced association of TCR/CD3 and DIG.     

CD80 cytoplasmic domain controls localization of CD28, CTLA-4, and protein kinase Ctheta in the immunological synapse

The binding of costimulatory ligand CD80 to CD28 or CTLA-4 on T cells plays an important role in the regulation of the T cell response. We have examined the role of the cytoplasmic domain of CD80 in murine T cell costimulation and its organization in the immunological synapse (IS). Removal of CD80 cytoplasmic tail decreased its effectiveness in costimulating T cell proliferative response and early IL-2 production in response to agonist MHC-peptide complexes. Immunofluorescent study showed a decreased tailless CD80 accumulation in the IS of naive T cells. The two forms of CD80 accumulated differently at the IS; the tailless CD80 was colocalized with the TCR whereas the full-length CD80 was segregated from the TCR. In addition, we showed that CD80, CD28, and protein kinase Ctheta colocalized in the presence or absence of the CD80 cytoplasmic tail. Thus, the cytoplasmic tail of CD80 regulates its spatial localization at the IS and that of its receptors and T cell signaling molecules such as protein kinase Ctheta, and thereby facilitates full T cell activation.     

CD28 and the tyrosine kinase lck stimulate mitogen-activated protein kinase activity in T cells via inhibition of the small G protein Rap1

Proliferation of T cells via activation of the T-cell receptor (TCR) requires concurrent engagement of accessory costimulatory molecules to achieve full activation. The best-studied costimulatory molecule, CD28, achieves these effects, in part, by augmenting signals from the TCR to the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade. We show here that TCR-mediated stimulation of MAP kinase extracellular-signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) is limited by activation of the Ras antagonist Rap1. CD28 increases ERK signaling by blocking Rap1 action. CD28 inhibits Rap1 activation because it selectively stimulates an extrinsic Rap1 GTPase activity. The ability of CD28 to stimulate Rap1 GTPase activity was dependent on the tyrosine kinase Lck. Our results suggest that CD28-mediated Rap1 GTPase-activating protein activation can help explain the augmentation of ERKs during CD28 costimulation.     

CD28 costimulation accelerates IL-4 receptor sensitivity and IL-4-mediated Th2 differentiation.

The development of Th1 and Th2 cells is determined by the type of antigenic stimulation involved in the initial cell activation step. Evidence indicates that costimulatory signals, such as those delivered by CD28, play an important role in Th2 development, but little is known about how CD28 costimulation contributes to Th2 development. In this study, TCR cross-linking was insufficient for Th2 development, while the addition of CD28 costimulation drastically increased Th2 generation through the IL-4-mediated pathway. Th2 generation following CD28 costimulation was not simply explained by the enhancement of IL-4 production in naive T cells. To generate Th2 cells after TCR cross-linking only, it was necessary to add a 20- to 200-fold excess of IL-4 generated after TCR and CD28 stimulation. TCR cross-linking increased the expression level and binding property of the IL-4R, but enhanced the sensitivity to IL-4 only slightly. In contrast, as evidenced by the enhanced phosphorylation of Jak3, the IL-4Ralpha-chain, and STAT6 following IL-4 stimulation, CD28 costimulation increased IL-4R sensitivity without affecting its expression and binding property. This evidence of the enhancement of IL-4R sensitivity increases our understanding of how CD28 costimulation accelerates Th2 development.