Phosphorylation-independent Regulation of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 Desensitization and Internalization by G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase 2 in Neurons

The uncoupling of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) from heterotrimeric G proteins represents an essential feedback mechanism that protects neurons against receptor overstimulation that may ultimately result in damage. The desensitization of mGluR signaling is mediated by both second messenger-dependent protein kinases and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). Unlike mGluR1, the attenuation of mGluR5 signaling in HEK 293 cells is reported to be mediated by a phosphorylation-dependent mechanism. However, the mechanisms regulating mGluR5 signaling and endocytosis in neurons have not been investigated. Here we show that a 2-fold overexpression of GRK2 leads to the attenuation of endogenous mGluR5-mediated inositol phosphate (InsP) formation in striatal neurons and siRNA knockdown of GRK2 expression leads to enhanced mGluR5-mediated InsP formation. Expression of a catalytically inactive GRK2-K220R mutant also effectively attenuates mGluR5 signaling, but the expression of a GRK2-D110A mutant devoid in Gα_q/11 binding increases mGluR5 signaling in response to agonist stimulation. Taken together, these results indicate that the attenuation of mGluR5 responses in striatal neurons is phosphorylation-independent. In addition, we find that mGluR5 does not internalize in response to agonist treatment in striatal neuron, but is efficiently internalized in cortical neurons that have higher levels of endogenous GRK2 protein expression. When overexpressed in striatal neurons, GRK2 promotes agonist-stimulated mGluR5 internalization. Moreover, GRK2-mediated promotion of mGluR5 endocytosis does not require GRK2 catalytic activity. Thus, we provide evidence that GRK2 mediates phosphorylation-independent mGluR5 desensitization and internalization in neurons.Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain and functions to activate two distinct classes of receptors (ionotropic and metabotropic) to regulate a variety of physiological functions (1–3). Ionotropic glutamate receptors, such as NMDA, AMPA, and kainate receptors, are ligand-gated ion channels, whereas metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs)⁵ are members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily (4–7). mGluRs modulate synaptic activity via the activation of heterotrimeric G proteins that are coupled to a variety of second messenger cascades. Group I mGluRs (mGluR1 and mGluR5) are coupled to the activation of Gα_q/11 proteins, which stimulate the activation of phospholipase Cβ1 resulting in diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP₃) formation, release of Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores and subsequent activation of protein kinase C.The attenuation of GPCR signaling is mediated in part by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), which phosphorylate GPCRs to promote the binding of β-arrestin proteins that uncouple GPCRs from heterotrimeric G proteins (8–10). GRK2 has been demonstrated to contribute to the phosphorylation and desensitization of both mGluR1 and mGluR5 in human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells (11–17). GRK4 is also implicated in mediating the desensitization of mGluR1 signaling in cerebellar Purkinje cells, but does not contribute to the desensitization of mGluR5 (14, 15). In addition, GRK4 plays a major role in mGluR1 internalization (13, 14). A role for GRK2 in promoting mGluR1 internalization is less clear as different laboratories have obtained discordant results (11, 14, 15, 16). However, the only study examining the role of GRK2 in regulating mGluR1 endocytosis in a native system reported that GRK2 knockdown had no effect upon mGluR1 internalization in cerebellar Purkinje cells (14).GRK2 is composed of three functional domains: an N-terminal regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) homology (RH) domain, a central catalytic domain, and a C-terminal G_βγ binding pleckstrin homology domain (18). In HEK 293 cells, mGluR1 desensitization is not dependent on GRK2 catalytic activity. Rather the GRK2 RH domain interacts with both the second intracellular loop domain of mGluR1 and the α-subunit of Gα_q/11 and attenuates second messenger responses by disrupting the mGluR1/Gα_q/11 signaling complexes (12, 19–21). Although the molecular mechanism underlying GRK2-mediated attenuation of mGluR1 signaling is relatively well established in HEK 293 cells, the role of GRK2 in regulating the desensitization of mGluRs in neurons remains to be determined. Moreover, it is not known whether GRK2-dependent attenuation of mGluR5 signaling is mediated by the same phosphorylation-independent mechanism that has been described for mGluR1. In a previous study, GRK2-mediated mGluR5 desensitization was reported to be phosphorylation-dependent, based on the observation that the overexpression of a catalytically inactive GRK2 (K220R) did not attenuate mGluR5 signaling (15). In the present study, we examined whether a 2-fold overexpression of GRK2 in primary mouse striatal neurons to match GRK2 expression levels found in the cortex results in increased agonist-stimulated desensitization and internalization of endogenous mGluR5. We report here that GRK2 mediates phosphorylation-independent mGluR5 desensitization and internalization. Furthermore, GRK2 knockdown causes an increase in mGluR5 signaling, demonstrating that endogenous GRK2 plays a role in mGluR5 desensitization.     

The Application of Recombinant Phototoxins 4D5scFv-miniSOG and DARPin-miniSOG to Study the HER2 Receptor Internalization

It was found that the fluorescent properties of the phototoxic domain of miniSOG allow to assess the ability of toxins to bind to human breast adenocarcinoma cells SK-BR-3 and study the dynamics of their internalization. We established that the main cause of the decrease of the fluorescence intensity of the recombinant proteins 4D5scFv-miniSOG and DARPin-miniSOG during their internalization in the complex with the HER2 receptor is their shielding and absorption of the fluorescence of miniSOG by the cells fluorophores.     

D(2)-Dopamine receptors target regulator of G protein signaling 9-2 to detergent-resistant membrane fractions

Detergent-resistant membranes (DRM) are thought to contain structures such as lipid rafts that are involved in compartmentalizing cell membranes. We report that the majority of D(2)-dopamine receptors (D(2)R) expressed endogenously in mouse striatum or expressed in immortalized cell-lines is found in DRM. In addition, exogenous co-expression of D(2)R in a cell line shifted the expression of regulator of G protein signaling 9-2 (RGS9-2) into DRM. RGS9-2 is a protein that is highly enriched in the striatum and specifically regulates striatal D(2)R. In the striatum, RGS9-2 is mostly associated with DRMs but when expressed in cell lines, RGS9-2 is present in the soluble cytoplasmic fraction. In contrast, the majority of mu opioid receptors and delta opioid receptors are found in detergent-soluble membrane and there was no shift of RGS9-2 into DRM after co-expression of mu opioid receptor. These data suggest that the targeting of RGS9-2 to DRM in the striatum is mediated by D(2)R and that DRM is involved in the formation of a D(2)R signaling complex. D(2)R-mediated targeting of RGS9-2 to DRM was blocked by the deletion of the RGS9-2 DEP domain or by a point mutation that abolishes the GTPase accelerating protein function of RGS9-2.     

Receptor Density Is Key to the Alpha2/Beta Interferon Differential Activities

Multiple type I interferons (IFN-α/β) elicit Jak/Stat activation, rapid gene induction, and pleiotropic effects, such as differentiation, antiviral protection, and blocks in proliferation, which are dependent on the IFN subtype and the cellular context. To date, ligand- and receptor-specific molecular determinants underlying IFN-α/β differential activities or potencies have been well characterized. To analyze cellular determinants that impact subtype-specific potency, human fibrosarcoma U5A-derived clones, exhibiting a gradient of IFN sensitivity by virtue of increasing receptor levels, were monitored for Jak/Stat signaling, gene induction, cell cycle lengthening, and apoptosis. In cells with scarce receptors, IFN-β was more potent than IFN-α2 in antiproliferative activity, while the two subtypes were equipotent in all other readouts. Conversely, in cells with abundant receptors, IFN-α2 matched or even surpassed IFN-β in all readouts tested. Our results suggest that the differential activities of the IFN subtypes are dictated not only by the intrinsic ligand/receptor binding kinetics but also by the density of cell surface receptor components.A persistent question in the field of helically bundled cytokines concerns the molecular basis of intracellular signal activation following binding to cognate cell surface receptors. Typically, cytokine-induced dimerization of the receptor subunits is thought to trigger catalytic transactivation of the associated Jak tyrosine kinases. Phosphorylation of critical receptor tyrosine motifs by the activated Jak proteins allows recruitment and activation of downstream Stat effectors (25, 34). A clear distinction can be made between the short homodimeric Jak2-activating receptors, such as the growth hormone or the erythropoietin receptors, and the more complex heteromeric receptors. Among these latter is the type I interferon (IFN) receptor, a prototypic class 2 receptor, made of two subunits, each associated with a different Jak enzyme (29). IFNAR2 contains extracellularly two fibronectin III domains forming a well-defined cytokine binding module. The cytoplasmic region of IFNAR2 is 250 amino acids long, interacts with Jak1, and contains two principal Tyr-based Stat recruitment motifs (24, 35). IFNAR1 is made of a large ectodomain of four fibronectin III domains, not all involved in ligand binding, and a 100-amino-acid-long cytoplasmic region complexed with Tyk2 and subjected to ligand-induced ubiquitination driving receptor proteolysis (13, 14).A large array of IFNs (over a dozen α subtypes and one β subtype) bind to this ubiquitously expressed receptor complex to induce rapid gene expression programs that elicit measurable antiviral responses and cell growth inhibition as well as cell context-specific functional changes (4, 31). Several studies have reported on differential activities of type I IFNs, but no unique function has ever been attributed to a given subtype (see references in reference 29). Thus, a differential can be defined as a lack of correlation between two specific activities. For instance, depending on the cell system, IFN-α2 and IFN-β can exhibit equivalent antiproliferative potency or over a 100-fold difference in antiproliferative potency and nearly equipotency in antiviral activity. Since no overt differences are observed in the structure or stoichiometry of the ligand-receptor complex formed with different subtypes, the concordant view points to the way each IFN subtype engages the available receptors. Indeed, kinetic measurements of the interaction of IFN-α2 and IFN-β with receptor ectodomains have shown substantial differences. IFNAR2 represents the high-affinity subunit, toward which IFN-α2 exhibits nanomolar binding affinity and IFN-β exhibits ∼100 pM binding affinity. Conversely, IFNAR1 is the low-affinity subunit, toward which IFN-α2 exhibits micromolar affinity and IFN-β ∼50 nM affinity (19, 22). The contribution of the individual and combined affinities on ternary complex formation by either IFN subtype have been thoroughly studied (10, 26). However, how these dynamic parameters influence receptor function and translate into activation of Jak, recruitment of Stats and additional effectors, gene induction, and bioactivities remains ill defined.Rather than focusing on ligand and receptor determinants, here we investigated the relationship between receptor subunit levels and IFN-α2 versus IFN-β signaling and functional outcomes (IFN-α2/β differential potencies). Since we previously showed that no simple relationship between receptor levels and Jak/Stat signaling can be inferred by comparing different cell types (18), we have used a reductionist approach in a single cell type, from which we have engineered and studied clones expressing low or abundant receptor levels. We show that the density of receptors at the cell surface represents a critical determinant of the level of differential activity exhibited by two IFN subtypes.     

Development of Polyclonal Anti-D2 Dopamine Receptor Antibodies to Fusion Proteins: Inhibition of D2 Receptor–G Protein Interaction

Abstract: Portions of the cDNA encoding the third intracellular loop (i3 loop) of the long and short isoforms of the rat D2 dopamine receptor were subcloned into the vector pNMHUBpoly and expressed in Escherichia coli as fusion proteins. The fusion proteins were gel-purified and used to immunize rabbits for the production of polyclonal anti-receptor antisera. The anti-fusion protein antisera recognized synthetic peptides corresponding to segments of the i3 loops of D2 dopamine receptors in a solid-phase radioimmunoassay. Antisera were tested in an immunoprecipitation assay using the reversible D2 antagonist [¹²⁵I]NCQ 298 and digitonin-solubilized extracts of canine and rat caudate. [¹²⁵I]-NCQ 298 bound reversibly and with high affinity (K_D= 0.14 n M ) to receptors in solubilized extracts enriched by chromatography on heparin-agarose. The anti-UBI-D2i3_L and anti-UBI-D2i3_s antisera were able to immunoprecipitate quantitatively D2 dopamine receptors labeled with [¹²⁵I]NCQ 298 from solubilized rat caudate. The antibodies were tested for their ability to affect the coupling of D2 dopamine receptors to GTP-binding proteins in digitonin-solubilized rat caudate. Both anti-UBI-D2i3_L and anti-UBI-D2i3_s antisera were able to inhibit the high-affinity binding of the agonist N -propylnorapomorphine to digitonin-solubilized rat caudate. These findings indicate that the i3 loop of the D2 dopamine receptor is an important determinant for coupling of the G protein.     

G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase-2 Constitutively Regulates D2 Dopamine Receptor Expression and Signaling Independently of Receptor Phosphorylation

We investigated the regulatory effects of GRK2 on D₂ dopamine receptor signaling and found that this kinase inhibits both receptor expression and functional signaling in a phosphorylation-independent manner, apparently through different mechanisms. Overexpression of GRK2 was found to suppress receptor expression at the cell surface and enhance agonist-induced internalization, whereas short interfering RNA knockdown of endogenous GRK2 led to an increase in cell surface receptor expression and decreased agonist-mediated endocytosis. These effects were not due to GRK2-mediated phosphorylation of the D₂ receptor as a phosphorylation-null receptor mutant was regulated similarly, and overexpression of a catalytically inactive mutant of GRK2 produced the same effects. The suppression of receptor expression is correlated with constitutive association of GRK2 with the receptor complex as we found that GRK2 and several of its mutants were able to co-immunoprecipitate with the D₂ receptor. Agonist pretreatment did not enhance the ability of GRK2 to co-immunoprecipitate with the receptor. We also found that overexpression of GRK2 attenuated the functional coupling of the D₂ receptor and that this activity required the kinase activity of GRK2 but did not involve receptor phosphorylation, thus suggesting the involvement of an additional GRK2 substrate. Interestingly, we found that the suppression of functional signaling also required the Gβγ binding activity of GRK2 but did not involve the GRK2 N-terminal RH domain. Our results suggest a novel mechanism by which GRK2 negatively regulates G protein-coupled receptor signaling in a manner that is independent of receptor phosphorylation.     

Dopamine D2 Receptor Relies upon PPM/PP2C Protein Phosphatases to Dephosphorylate Huntingtin Protein

Striatal dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) relies upon G protein- and β-arrestin-dependent signaling pathways to convey its action on motor control and behavior. Considering that D2R activation inhibits Akt in the striatum and that huntingtin physiological functions are affected by Akt phosphorylation, we sought to investigate whether D2R-mediated signaling could regulate huntingtin phosphorylation. We demonstrate that D2R activation decreases huntingtin phosphorylation on its Akt site. This dephosphorylation event depends upon the Gα_i-dependent engagement of specific members of the protein phosphatase metallo-dependent (PPM/PP2C) family and is independent of β-arrestin 2. These observations identify the PPM/PP2C family as a mediator of G protein-coupled receptor signaling and thereby suggest a novel mechanism of dopaminergic signaling.     

Calcyon Forms a Novel Ternary Complex with Dopamine D1 Receptor through PSD-95 Protein and Plays a Role in Dopamine Receptor Internalization

Calcyon, once known for interacting directly with the dopamine D(1) receptor (D(1)DR), is implicated in various neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Although its direct interaction with D(1)DR has been shown to be misinterpreted, it still plays important roles in D(1)DR signaling. Here, we found that calcyon interacts with the PSD-95 and subsequently forms a ternary complex with D(1)DR through PSD-95. Calcyon is phosphorylated on Ser-169 by the PKC activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate or by the D(1)DR agonist SKF-81297, and its phosphorylation increases its association with PSD-95 and recruitment to the cell surface. Interestingly, the internalization of D(1)DR at the cell surface was enhanced by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and SKF-81297 in the presence of calcyon, but not in the presence of its S169A phospho-deficient mutant, suggesting that the phosphorylation of calcyon and the internalization of the surface D(1)DR are tightly correlated. Our results suggest that calcyon regulates D(1)DR trafficking by forming a ternary complex with D(1)DR through PSD-95 and thus possibly linking glutamatergic and dopamine receptor signalings. This also raises the possibility that a novel ternary complex could represent a potential therapeutic target for the modulation of related neuropsychiatric disorders.     

G Protein Subunit Dissociation and Translocation Regulate Cellular Response to Receptor Stimulation

We examined the role of G proteins in modulating the response of living cells to receptor activation. The response of an effector, phospholipase C-β to M3 muscarinic receptor activation was measured using sensors that detect the generation of inositol triphosphate or diacylglycerol. The recently discovered translocation of Gβγ from plasma membrane to endomembranes on receptor activation attenuated this response. A FRET based G protein sensor suggested that in contrast to translocating Gβγ, non-translocating Gβγ subunits do not dissociate from the αq subunit on receptor activation leading to prolonged retention of the heterotrimer state and an accentuated response. M3 receptors with tethered αq induced differential responses to receptor activation in cells with or without an endogenous translocation capable γ subunit. G protein heterotrimer dissociation and βγ translocation are thus unanticipated modulators of the intensity of a cell''s response to an extracellular signal.     

Eps15 Is Recruited to the Plasma Membrane upon Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activation and Localizes to Components of the Endocytic Pathway during Receptor Internalization

Eps15 is a substrate for the tyrosine kinase of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and is characterized by the presence of a novel protein:protein interaction domain, the EH domain. Eps15 also stably binds the clathrin adaptor protein complex AP-2. Previous work demonstrated an essential role for eps15 in receptor-mediated endocytosis. In this study we show that, upon activation of the EGFR kinase, eps15 undergoes dramatic relocalization consisting of 1) initial relocalization to the plasma membrane and 2) subsequent colocalization with the EGFR in various intracellular compartments of the endocytic pathway, with the notable exclusion of coated vesicles. Relocalization of eps15 is independent of its binding to the EGFR or of binding of the receptor to AP-2. Furthermore, eps15 appears to undergo tyrosine phosphorylation both at the plasma membrane and in a nocodazole-sensitive compartment, suggesting sustained phosphorylation in endocytic compartments. Our results are consistent with a model in which eps15 undergoes cycles of association:dissociation with membranes and suggest multiple roles for this protein in the endocytic pathway.     

Dopamine D1-D2 Receptor Heteromer-mediated Calcium Release Is Desensitized by D1 Receptor Occupancy with or without Signal Activation: DUAL FUNCTIONAL REGULATION BY G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR KINASE 2*

We identified that activation of the G_q-linked dopamine D1-D2 receptor hetero-oligomer generates a PLC-dependent intracellular calcium signal. Confocal FRET between endogenous dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in striatal neurons confirmed a physical interaction between them. Pretreatment with SKF 83959, which selectively activates the D1-D2 receptor heteromer, or SKF 83822, which only activates the D1 receptor homo-oligomer, led to rapid desensitization of the D1-D2 receptor heteromer-mediated calcium signal in both heterologous cells and striatal neurons. This desensitization response was mediated through selective occupancy of the D1 receptor binding pocket. Although SKF 83822 was unable to activate the D1-D2 receptor heteromer, it still permitted desensitization of the calcium signal. This suggested that occupancy of the D1 receptor binding pocket by SKF 83822 resulted in conformational changes sufficient for desensitization without heteromer activation. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer and co-immunoprecipitation studies indicated an agonist-induced physical association between the D1-D2 receptor heteromeric complex and GRK2. Increased expression of GRK2 led to a decrease in the calcium signal with or without prior exposure to either SKF 83959 or SKF 83822. GRK2 knockdown by siRNA led to an increase in the signal after pretreatment with either agonist. Expression of the catalytically inactive and RGS (regulator of G protein signaling)-mutated GRK2 constructs each led to a partial recovery of the GRK2-attenuated calcium signal. These results indicated that desensitization of the dopamine D1-D2 receptor heteromer-mediated signal can occur by agonist occupancy even without activation and is dually regulated by both the catalytic and RGS domains of GRK2.     

Cdk5 Phosphorylates Dopamine D2 Receptor and Attenuates Downstream Signaling

The dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) is a key receptor that mediates dopamine-associated brain functions such as mood, reward, and emotion. Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) is a proline-directed serine/threonine kinase whose function has been implicated in the brain reward circuit. In this study, we revealed that the serine 321 residue (S321) in the third intracellular loop of DRD2 (D2i3) is a novel regulatory site of Cdk5. Cdk5-dependent phosphorylation of S321 in the D2i3 was observed in in vitro and cell culture systems. We further observed that the phosphorylation of S321 impaired the agonist-stimulated surface expression of DRD2 and decreased G protein coupling to DRD2. Moreover, the downstream cAMP pathway was affected in the heterologous system and in primary neuronal cultures from p35 knockout embryos likely due to the reduced inhibitory activity of DRD2. These results indicate that Cdk5-mediated phosphorylation of S321 inhibits DRD2 function, providing a novel regulatory mechanism for dopamine signaling.     

Desensitization and Internalization of Endothelin Receptor A: IMPACT OF G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR KINASE 2 (GRK2)-MEDIATED PHOSPHORYLATION*

Endothelin receptor A (ET_A), a G protein-coupled receptor, mediates endothelin signaling, which is regulated by GRK2. Three Ser and seven Thr residues recently proven to be phosphoacceptor sites are located in the C-terminal extremity (CTE) of the receptor following its palmitoylation site. We created various phosphorylation-deficient ET_A mutants. The phospholipase C activity of mutant receptors in HEK-293 cells was analyzed during continuous endothelin stimulation to investigate the impact of phosphorylation sites on ET_A desensitization. Total deletion of phosphoacceptor sites in the CTE affected proper receptor regulation. However, proximal and distal phosphoacceptor sites both turned out to be sufficient to induce WT-like desensitization. Overexpression of the Gα_q coupling-deficient mutant GRK2-D110A suppressed ET_A-WT signaling but failed to decrease phospholipase C activity mediated by the phosphorylation-deficient mutant ET_A-6PD. In contrast, GRK2-WT acted on both receptors, whereas the kinase-inactive mutant GRK2-D110A/K220R failed to inhibit signaling of ET_A-WT and ET_A-6PD. This demonstrates that ET_A desensitization involves at least two autonomous GRK2-mediated components: 1) a phosphorylation-independent signal decrease mediated by blocking of Gα_q and 2) a mechanism involving phosphorylation of Ser and Thr residues in the CTE of the receptor in a redundant fashion, able to incorporate either proximal or distal phosphoacceptor sites. High level transfection of GRK2 variants influenced signaling of ET_A-WT and ET_A-6PD and hints at an additional phosphorylation-independent regulatory mechanism. Furthermore, internalization of mRuby-tagged receptors was observed with ET_A-WT and the phosphorylation-deficient mutant ET_A-14PD (lacking 14 phosphoacceptor sites) and turned out to be based on a phosphorylation-independent mechanism.     

Protease-activated Receptor 2 (PAR2) Protein and Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) Protein Coupling Is Required for Sustained Inflammatory Signaling

G protein-coupled receptors of nociceptive neurons can sensitize transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels, which amplify neurogenic inflammation and pain. Protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR₂), a receptor for inflammatory proteases, is a major mediator of neurogenic inflammation and pain. We investigated the signaling mechanisms by which PAR₂ regulates TRPV4 and determined the importance of tyrosine phosphorylation in this process. Human TRPV4 was expressed in HEK293 cells under control of a tetracycline-inducible promoter, allowing controlled and graded channel expression. In cells lacking TRPV4, the PAR₂ agonist stimulated a transient increase in [Ca²⁺]_i. TRPV4 expression led to a markedly sustained increase in [Ca²⁺]_i. Removal of extracellular Ca²⁺ and treatment with the TRPV4 antagonists Ruthenium Red or HC067047 prevented the sustained response. Inhibitors of phospholipase A₂ and cytochrome P450 epoxygenase attenuated the sustained response, suggesting that PAR₂ generates arachidonic acid-derived lipid mediators, such as 5′,6′-EET, that activate TRPV4. Src inhibitor 1 suppressed PAR₂-induced activation of TRPV4, indicating the importance of tyrosine phosphorylation. The TRPV4 tyrosine mutants Y110F, Y805F, and Y110F/Y805F were expressed normally at the cell surface. However, PAR₂ was unable to activate TRPV4 with the Y110F mutation. TRPV4 antagonism suppressed PAR₂ signaling to primary nociceptive neurons, and TRPV4 deletion attenuated PAR₂-stimulated neurogenic inflammation. Thus, PAR₂ activation generates a signal that induces sustained activation of TRPV4, which requires a key tyrosine residue (TRPV4-Tyr-110). This mechanism partly mediates the proinflammatory actions of PAR₂.     

Functional Coupling of G Proteins to Endothelin Receptors Is Ligand and Receptor Subtype Specific

1. The aims of the present study were (a) to determine the identity of the G proteins with which the endothelin receptor interacts and whether this interaction is subtype specific and (b) to determine whether agonist exposure can result in specific coupling between the endothelin receptor and G proteins.2. Coupling between endothelin A (ET_A) or endothelin B (ET_B) receptors and G proteins was assessed in two fibroblast cell lines, each expressing one receptor subtype. Four ligands, ET-1, ET-3, SRTXb, and SRTXc, were used for receptor stimulation. The G protein -subunit coupled to the receptor was identified by immunoprecipitation with an antibody against the endothelin receptor and immunoblotting with specific antibodies against different G protein -subunits.3. Unstimulated ET_A and ET_B receptors (ET_AR and ET_BR, respectively) were barely coupled to G_o. The unstimulated ET_AR coimmunoprecipitated with G_i3, whereas the unstimulated ET_BR was much less strongly coupled to G_i3. The coupling of ET_BR to G_i1G_i2 -subunits was much stronger than the coupling of ET_AR to these -subunits. Stimulation with the different ET agonists also resulted in differential coupling of G proteins to the receptor subtypes. All four ligands caused a strong increase in coupling of the ET_BR to G_i3, whereas coupling of the ET_AR to this subunit was not affected by ET-1 and was even decreased by SRTXc. On the other hand, all four ligands caused a much greater increase in the coupling of ET_AR to G_q/G₁₁ than in the coupling of ET_BR to these -subunits. Ligand-induced coupling between the receptors and the G_i1 and G_i2 -subunits is similar for the two receptor subtypes. The same was true for ligand-induced coupling of the receptors to G_o, except that ET-3 increased the coupling of this -subunit to ET_BR and decreased the coupling to ET_AR. Taken together, the results of this study show that coupling between ET receptors and G proteins is ligand and receptor subtype specific.4. It remains to be established whether this diversity of receptor–G protein coupling is of relevance for the various endothelin signaling pathways and/or pathological states.     

Macromolecular Composition Dictates Receptor and G Protein Selectivity of Regulator of G Protein Signaling (RGS) 7 and 9-2 Protein Complexes in Living Cells

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins play essential roles in the regulation of signaling via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). With hundreds of GPCRs and dozens of G proteins, it is important to understand how RGS regulates selective GPCR-G protein signaling. In neurons of the striatum, two RGS proteins, RGS7 and RGS9-2, regulate signaling by μ-opioid receptor (MOR) and dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) and are implicated in drug addiction, movement disorders, and nociception. Both proteins form trimeric complexes with the atypical G protein β subunit Gβ5 and a membrane anchor, R7BP. In this study, we examined GTPase-accelerating protein (GAP) activity as well as Gα and GPCR selectivity of RGS7 and RGS9-2 complexes in live cells using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assay that monitors dissociation of G protein subunits. We showed that RGS9-2/Gβ5 regulated both Gi and Go with a bias toward Go, but RGS7/Gβ5 could serve as a GAP only for Go. Interestingly, R7BP enhanced GAP activity of RGS7 and RGS9-2 toward Go and Gi and enabled RGS7 to regulate Gi signaling. Neither RGS7 nor RGS9-2 had any activity toward Gz, Gs, or Gq in the absence or presence of R7BP. We also observed no effect of GPCRs (MOR and D2R) on the G protein bias of R7 RGS proteins. However, the GAP activity of RGS9-2 showed a strong receptor preference for D2R over MOR. Finally, RGS7 displayed an four times greater GAP activity relative to RGS9-2. These findings illustrate the principles involved in establishing G protein and GPCR selectivity of striatal RGS proteins.     

Internalization of the Human Nicotinic Acid Receptor GPR109A Is Regulated by Gi,GRK2, and Arrestin3

Nicotinic acid (niacin) has been widely used as a favorable lipid-lowering drug for several decades, and the orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR109A has been identified to be a receptor for niacin. Mechanistic investigations have shown that as a G_i-coupled receptor, GPR109A inhibits adenylate cyclase activity upon niacin activation, thereby inhibiting free fatty acid liberation. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms that regulate signaling and internalization of GPR109A remain largely unknown. To further characterize GPR109A internalization, we made a construct to express GPR109A fused with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) at its carboxyl-terminal end. In stable GPR109A-EGFP-expressing HEK-293 cells, GPR109A-EGFP was mainly localized at the plasma membrane and was rapidly internalized in a dose- and time-dependent manner upon agonist stimulation. GPR109A internalization was completely blocked by hypertonic sucrose, indicating that GPR109A internalizes via the clathrin-coated pit pathway. Further investigation demonstrated that internalized GPR109A was recycled to the cell surface after the removal of agonist, and recycling of the internalized receptors was not blocked by treatment with acidotropic agents, NH₄Cl and monensin. Pertussis toxin pretreatment not only inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation and intracellular Ca²⁺ mobilization; it also significantly attenuated agonist-promoted GPR109A internalization. Moreover, RNA interference experiments showed that knockdown of GRK2 (G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2) and arrestin3 expression significantly impaired receptor internalization. Taken together, these results indicate that the agonist-induced internalization of GPR109A receptors is regulated by GRK2 and arrestin3 in a pertussis toxin-sensitive manner and that internalized receptor recycling is independent of endosomal acidification.     

ZAP-70 Protein Tyrosine Kinase Is Constitutively Targeted to the T Cell Cortex Independently of its SH2 Domains

ZAP-70 is a nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinase that is essential for signaling via the T cell antigen receptor (TCR). ZAP-70 becomes phosphorylated and activated by LCK protein tyrosine kinase after interaction of its two NH₂-terminal SH2 domains with tyrosine-phosphorylated subunits of the activated TCR. In this study, the localization of ZAP-70 was investigated by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. ZAP-70 was found to be localized to the cell cortex in a diffuse band under the plasma membrane in unstimulated T cells, and this localization was not detectably altered by TCR stimulation. Analysis of mutants indicated that ZAP-70 targeting was independent of its SH2 domains but required its active kinase domain. The specific compartmentalization of ZAP-70 suggests that it may interact with an anchoring protein in the cell cortex via its hinge or kinase domains. It is likely that the maintenance of high concentrations of ZAP-70 at the cell cortex, that only has to move a short distance to interact with phophorylated TCR subunits, facilitates rapid initiation of signaling by the TCR. In addition, as the major increase in tyrosine phosphorylation induced by the TCR also occurs at the cell cortex (Ley, S.C., M. Marsh, C.R. Bebbington, K. Proudfoot, and P. Jordan. 1994. J. Cell. Biol. 125:639–649), ZAP-70 may be localized close to its downstream targets.