Further evidence that papillomavirus capsids exist in two distinct conformations

Cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) serve as primary attachment receptors for human papillomaviruses (HPVs). To demonstrate that a biologically functional HPV-receptor interaction is restricted to a specific subset of HSPGs, we first explored the role of HSPG glucosaminoglycan side chain modifications. We demonstrate that HSPG O sulfation is essential for HPV binding and infection, whereas de-N-sulfated heparin interfered with VLP binding but not with HPV pseudoinfection. This points to differences in VLP-HSPG and pseudovirion-HSPG interactions. Interestingly, internalization kinetics of VLPs and pseudovirions, as measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, also differ significantly with approximate half times of 3.5 and 7.5 h, respectively. These data suggest that differences in HSPG binding significantly influence postbinding events. We also present evidence that pseudovirions undergo a conformational change after cell attachment. A monoclonal antibody (H33.J3), which displays negligible effectiveness in preattachment neutralization assays, efficiently neutralizes cell-bound virions. However, no difference in H33.J3 binding to pseudovirions and VLPs was observed in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and virus capture assays. In contrast to antibody H33.B6, which displays equal efficiencies in pre- and postattachment neutralization assays, H33.J3 does not block VLP binding to heparin, demonstrating that it interferes with steps subsequent to virus binding. Our data strongly suggest that H33.J3 recognizes a conformation-dependent epitope in capsid protein L1, which undergoes a structural change after cell attachment.     

Different heparan sulfate proteoglycans serve as cellular receptors for human papillomaviruses

Papillomaviruses replicate in stratified epithelia of skin and mucosa. Infection with certain human papillomavirus (HPV) types is the main cause of anogenital neoplasia, in particular cervical cancer. Early events of papillomavirus infectivity are poorly understood. While heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) mediate initial binding to the cell surface, the class of proteins carrying heparan sulfates has not been defined. Here we examined two processes of papillomavirus infection, attachment of virus-like particles (VLP) to cells and infection with authentic HPV type 11 (HPV11) virions. Of the HSPGs, syndecan-1 is the major epithelial form and is strongly upregulated in wound edge keratinocytes. We employed K562 cells, which lack HSPGs except minor amounts of endogenous betaglycan, and stable clones that express cDNAs of syndecan-1, syndecan-4, or glypican-1. Binding of VLP correlated with levels of heparan sulfate on the cell surface. Parental K562 bound HPV16 VLP weakly, whereas all three K562 transfectants demonstrated enhanced binding, with the highest binding capacity observed for syndecan-1-transfected cells, which also expressed the most HSPG. For HPV11 infectivity assays, a high virion inoculum was required to infect K562 cells, whereas ectopic expression of syndecan-1 increased permissiveness eightfold and expression of syndecan-4 or glypican-1 fourfold. Infection of keratinocytes was eliminated by treatment with heparitinase, but not phospholipase C, further implicating the syndecan family of integral membrane proteins as receptor proteins. Human keratinocytes with a homozygous deletion of alpha6 integrin are permissive for HPV11 infection. These results indicate that several HSPGs can serve as HPV receptors and support a putative role for syndecan-1, rather than alpha6 integrin, as a primary receptor protein in natural HPV infection of keratinocytes.     

Role of Heparan Sulfate in Attachment to and Infection of the Murine Female Genital Tract by Human Papillomavirus

The host factors required for in vivo infection have not been investigated for any papillomavirus. Using a recently developed murine cervicovaginal challenge model, we evaluated the importance of heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) in human papillomavirus (HPV) infection of the murine female genital tract. We examined HPV type 16 (HPV16) as well as HPV31 and HPV5, for which some evidence suggests that they may differ from HPV16 in their utilization of HSPGs as their primary attachment factor in vitro. Luciferase-expressing pseudovirus of all three types infected the mouse genital tract, although HPV5, which normally infects nongenital epidermis, was less efficient. Heparinase III treatment of the genital tract significantly inhibited infection of all three types by greater than 90% and clearly inhibited virion attachment to the basement membrane and cell surfaces, establishing that HSPGs are the primary attachment factors for these three viruses in vivo. However, the pseudoviruses differed in their responses to treatment with various forms of heparin, a soluble analog of heparan sulfate. HPV16 and HPV31 infections were effectively inhibited by a highly sulfated form of heparin, but HPV5 was not, although it bound the compound. In contrast, a N-desulfated and N-acylated variant preferentially inhibited HPV5. Inhibition of infection paralleled the relative ability of the variants to inhibit basement membrane and cell surface binding. We speculate that cutaneous HPVs, such as HPV5, and genital mucosal HPVs, such as HPV16 and -31, may have evolved to recognize different forms of HSPGs to enable them to preferentially infect keratinocytes at different anatomical sites.Papillomaviruses (PVs) are icosahedral DNA viruses that have evolved into numerous genotypes that productively infect diverse vertebrates in a species-specific manner. These viruses also display strict tissue specificity, productively infecting only epithelial cells in the skin and mucosa. These features have inhibited viral propagation in vitro and retarded the development of in vivo models for infection. The human PVs (HPVs) belonging to the alpha genus preferentially infect the genital mucosa, and a subset of this genus include the types (e.g., HPV16, -18, -31, -33, and -45) that are the causative agents of cervical carcinoma. HPV types belonging to the beta genus generally cause asymptomatic skin infections, but certain beta types (e.g., HPV5 and -8) are associated with cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in individuals with the rare genetic disorder epidermodysplasia verruciformis.As with other viruses, virion attachment to the host cell is required for successful PV infection. In vitro studies have implicated cell surface heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycans (HSPGs) as the primary attachment factors for most HPV types (13, 15). HSPGs are composed of a core protein with covalently attached repeating disaccharide units known as glycosaminoglycans. Posttranslational modification of the glycosaminoglycans by acetylation and sulfation leads to substantial heterogeneity that varies across cell type and growth conditions (20, 23). HSPGs are nearly ubiquitously expressed on mammalian cell surfaces, where they are involved in diverse biological processes, including organogenesis, growth factor and cytokine binding, and wound healing. They are also integral components of the basement membrane (BM), the specialized extracellular matrix (ECM) that surrounds most tissues. In this locale, their putative functions include regulation of BM permeability, binding of growth factors, and a role in cellular adhesion (reviewed in reference 10).HSPGs can also help mediate infection by acting as receptors/coreceptors for some bacterial and viral pathogens (reviewed in reference 12). It is well established that HPV16 utilizes attachment to HSPGs for efficient infection in vitro. However, in vitro studies investigating other HPV types, such as HPV31 and HPV5, have described possible differences. Infection with HPV31 has been reported to be HSPG independent in keratinocyte lines such as HaCaT, although not in other, more transformed lines (17). Also, heparin, which shares the same disaccharide units with HS but is more homogeneous and has a higher level of sulfation, did not inhibit HPV5 infection at doses that efficiently blocked HPV16 infection in vitro (3).In addition to binding cell surfaces, PVs also bind strongly to the ECM deposited by epithelial cells in vitro and onto the BM in vivo (5, 9, 18). Laminin 5 appears to be the primary molecule mediating in vitro ECM binding (6). However, interaction with an HS moiety on the ECM may be critical for transfer of infectious virions to the cell surface (21). PV cell surface binding in vitro may arise independently of ECM binding; however, the kinetics of in vivo infection suggest that virion binding to the BM may be essential. It is therefore possible that this aspect of in vivo infection could differ from what has been seen in vitro.It is unclear if HSPGs play any role in PV infection in vivo, as the cellular factors and processes involved in PV infection of epithelial tissues in vivo have not been examined previously. There is a clear precedent of in vitro HSPG dependence for infection of cell lines that does not reflect an in vivo function. For instance, HSPGs facilitate human immunodeficiency virus infection of certain permissive lymphoid cell lines in vitro, yet they play no role in the infection of primary blood lymphocytes (14).In this study, we utilized our recently developed murine cervicovaginal challenge model (18), which is useful to examine establishment of HPV infection in vivo, to investigate the HSPG dependency of HPV infection, examining both binding and infection of HPV16 pseudovirions in the presence of agents that either compete for HS binding or remove HS from cell surfaces. Because of the published data suggesting possible differences from HPV16 in HSPG dependency for in vitro infection, we also evaluated HPV5 and HPV31 pseudovirions.     

Human papillomavirus infection requires cell surface heparan sulfate

Using pseudoinfection of cell lines, we demonstrate that cell surface heparan sulfate is required for infection by human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) and HPV-33 pseudovirions. Pseudoinfection was inhibited by heparin but not dermatan or chondroitin sulfate, reduced by reducing the level of surface sulfation, and abolished by heparinase treatment. Carboxy-terminally deleted HPV-33 virus-like particles still bound efficiently to heparin. The kinetics of postattachment neutralization by antiserum or heparin indicated that pseudovirions were shifted on the cell surface from a heparin-sensitive into a heparin-resistant mode of binding, possibly involving a secondary receptor. Alpha-6 integrin is not a receptor for HPV-33 pseudoinfection.     

Cell surface-binding motifs of L2 that facilitate papillomavirus infection

Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) is the primary etiologic agent of cervical carcinoma, whereas bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV1) causes benign fibropapillomas. However, the capsid proteins, L1 and L2, of these divergent papillomaviruses exhibit functional conservation. A peptide comprising residues 1 to 88 of BPV1 L2 binds to a variety of cell lines, but not to the monocyte-derived cell line D32, and blocks BPV1 infection of mouse C127 cells. Residues 13 to 31 of HPV16 L2 and BPV1 L2 residues 1 to 88 compete for binding to the cell surface, and their binding, unlike that of HPV16 L1/L2 virus-like particles, is unaffected by heparinase or trypsin pretreatment of HeLa cells. A fusion of HPV16 L2 peptide 13-31 and GFP binds (K(d), approximately 1 nM) to approximately 45,000 receptors per HeLa cell. Furthermore, mutation of L2 residues 18 and 19 or 21 and 22 significantly reduces both the ability of the HPV16 L2 13-31-GFP fusion protein to bind to SiHa cells and the infectivity of HPV16 pseudovirions. Antibody to BPV1 L2 peptides comprising residues 115 to 135 binds to intact BPV1 virions, but fails to neutralize at a 1:10 dilution. However, deletion of residues 91 to 129 from L2 abolishes the infectivity of BPV1, but not their binding to the cell surface. In summary, L2 residues 91 to 129 contain epitopes displayed on the virion surface and are required for infection, but not virion binding to the cell surface. Upon the binding of papillomavirus to the cell surface, residues 13 to 31 of L2 interact with a widely expressed, trypsin- and heparinase-resistant cell surface molecule and facilitate infection.     

Human papillomavirus type 16 minor capsid protein l2 N-terminal region containing a common neutralization epitope binds to the cell surface and enters the cytoplasm

The first step of papillomavirus infection is believed to be binding of major capsid protein L1 to the cell surface without involvement of minor capsid protein L2, but the viral infectivity can be neutralized either by anti-L1 or anti-L2 antibody. To understand the role of L2 in human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, we examined a segment of HPV type 16 (HPV16) L2, which contains a neutralization epitope common to HPV6, for its involvement in adsorption and penetration of the capsids. Preincubation of monkey COS-1 cells with a synthetic peptide having amino acids (aa) 108 to 120 of HPV16 L2 reduced the susceptibility of COS-1 cells to infection with HPV16 pseudovirions. Confocal microscopy showed that the green fluorescence protein (GFP) fused with the L2 peptide was found to bind to the surface of a HeLa cell, an HPV18-positive human cancer cell line, at 4 degrees C and to enter the cytoplasm after subsequent incubation at 37 degrees C. Flow cytometry showed that fused GFP did not bind to HeLa cells that had been treated with trypsin. Besides COS-1 and HeLa cells, some human and rodent cell lines were detected by flow cytometry to be susceptible to binding with fused GFP, showing a tendency of epithelial cells toward higher susceptibility. Substitutions at aa 108 to 111 inhibited fused GFP from binding to HeLa cells and reduced the infectivity in COS-1 cells of the in vitro-constructed pseudovirions. The results suggest that L2 plays an important role in enhancing HPV infection through interaction between the N-terminal region and a cellular surface protein, facilitating penetration of the virions and determining part of the tropism of HPVs.     

Phospholipase C release of basic fibroblast growth factor from human bone marrow cultures as a biologically active complex with a phosphatidylinositol-anchored heparan sulfate proteoglycan

Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) is a potent mitogen for human bone marrow stromal cells and stimulates haematopoiesis in vitro. We report here that primary human bone marrow cultures contain bFGF and express heparin-like bFGF binding sites on the cell surface and in the extracellular matrix (ECM). bFGF bound predominantly to a 200-kD cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG), which was also found in conditioned medium. bFGF was released from bone marrow cultures by incubation with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) and, less efficiently, by plasmin. Solubilized bFGF was found as a complex with the 200-kD HSPG. The complex was biologically active as shown by its ability to stimulate plasminogen activator production in bovine aortic endothelial cells. bFGF-HSPG complexes of bovine endothelial cells, however, were not released by PI-PLC. While only trace amounts of the bFGF-binding 200-kD HSPG were released spontaneously from bone marrow cultures, incubation with PI-PLC solubilized almost all of the 200-kD HSPG. The HSPG could be metabolically labeled with ethanolamine or palmitate, which was partially removed by treatment with PI-PLC. These findings indicate linkage of the HSPG to the cell surface via a phosphatidylinositol anchor. Plasmin released the 200-kD HSPG less efficiently than PI-PLC. We conclude that HSPGs of human bone marrow serve as a reservoir for bFGF, from which it can be released in a biologically active form via a dual mechanism; one involving a putative endogenous phospholipase, the other involving the proteolytic cascade of plasminogen activation.     

Interaction of tSNARE syntaxin 18 with the papillomavirus minor capsid protein mediates infection

The papillomavirus capsid mediates binding to the cell surface and passage of the virion to the perinuclear region during infection. To better understand how the virus traffics across the cell, we sought to identify cellular proteins that bind to the minor capsid protein L2. We have identified syntaxin 18 as a protein that interacts with bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV1) L2. Syntaxin 18 is a target membrane-associated soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor-attachment protein receptor (tSNARE) that resides in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The ectopic expression of FLAG-tagged syntaxin 18, which disrupts ER trafficking, blocked BPV1 pseudovirion infection. Furthermore, the expression of FLAG-syntaxin 18 prevented the passage of BPV1 pseudovirions to the perinuclear region that is consistent with the ER. Genetic studies identified a highly conserved L2 domain, DKILK, comprising residues 40 to 44 that mediated BPV1 trafficking through the ER during infection via an interaction with the tSNARE syntaxin 18. Mutations within the DKILK motif of L2 that did not significantly impact virion morphogenesis or binding at the cell surface prevented the L2 interaction with syntaxin 18 and disrupted BPV1 infection.     

Neutralization of human papillomavirus with monoclonal antibodies reveals different mechanisms of inhibition

The mechanisms of human papillomavirus (HPV) neutralization by antibodies are incompletely understood. We have used HPV16 pseudovirus infection of HaCaT cells to analyze how several neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) generated against HPV16 L1 interfere with the process of keratinocyte infection. HPV16 capsids normally bind to both the cell surface and extracellular matrix (ECM) of HaCaT cells. Surprisingly, two strongly neutralizing MAbs, V5 and E70, did not prevent attachment of capsids to the cell surface. However, they did block association with the ECM and prevented internalization of cell surface-bound capsids. In contrast, MAb U4 prevented binding to the cell surface but not to the ECM. The epitope recognized by U4 was inaccessible when virions were bound to the cell surface but became accessible after endocytosis, presumably coinciding with receptor detachment. Treatment of capsids with heparin, which is known to interfere with binding to cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), also resulted in HPV16 localization to the ECM. These results suggest that the U4 epitope on the intercapsomeric C-terminal arm is likely to encompass the critical HSPG interaction residues for HPV16, while the V5 and E70 epitopes at the apex of the capsomer overlap the ECM-binding sites. We conclude that neutralizing antibodies can inhibit HPV infection by multiple distinct mechanisms, and understanding these mechanisms can add insight to the HPV entry processes.     

Heparin increases the infectivity of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 independent of cell surface proteoglycans and induces L1 epitope exposure

Human Papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the etiological agents of cervical cancer, and HPV‐16 is the most prevalent type. Several HPVs require heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) for cell binding. Here, we analyse the phenomenon that preincubation of HPV‐16 with increasing concentrations of heparin results in partial restoration rather than more efficient inhibition of infection. While corroborating that the HSPGs are cell‐binding receptors for HPV‐16, heparin‐preincubated virus bound to the extracellular matrix (ECM) via laminin‐332. Furthermore, the interaction of virions with heparin, a representative of the highly sulfated S‐domains of heparan sulfate (HS) chains of HSPGs, allowed HPV‐16 infection in the absence of cell surface HSPGs. Therefore, we concluded that specific glycan moieties but not specific HSPG protein backbones are required for infection. The increased binding of an epitope‐specific antibody to the viral capsid after heparin binding suggested that initial conformational changes in the HPV‐16 virion occur during infection by interaction with‘heparin‐like’ domains of cellular HSPGs. We propose that HS sequences with specific sulfation patterns are required to facilitate HPV‐16 infection.     

Mechanisms of human papillomavirus type 16 neutralization by l2 cross-neutralizing and l1 type-specific antibodies

Pseudovirions of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16), the principal etiologic agent in 50% of cervical cancers, were used as a model system to investigate the cell surface interactions involved in the exposure of the broadly cross-neutralizing papillomavirus L2 epitopes. These neutralizing epitopes were exposed only after cell surface binding and a subsequent change in capsid conformation that permitted cleavage by the cellular protease furin at a specific highly conserved site in L2 that is immediately upstream of the cross-neutralizing epitopes. Unexpectedly, binding of L2 antibodies led to the release of the capsid/antibody complexes from the cell surface and their accumulation on the extracellular matrix. Study of the dynamics of exposure of the L2 epitopes further revealed that representatives of the apparently dominant class of L1-specific neutralizing antibodies induced by virus-like particle vaccination prevent infection, not by preventing cell surface binding but rather by preventing the conformation change involved in exposure of the L2 neutralizing epitope. These findings suggest a dynamic model of virion-cell surface interactions that has implications for both evolution of viral serotypes and the efficacy of current and future HPV vaccines.     

Endosulfatases SULF1 and SULF2 limit Chlamydia muridarum infection

The first step in attachment of Chlamydia to host cells is thought to involve reversible binding to host heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), polymers of variably sulfated repeating disaccharide units coupled to diverse protein backbones. However, the key determinants of HSPG structure that are involved in Chlamydia binding are incompletely defined. A previous genome‐wide Drosophila RNAi screen suggested that the level of HSPG 6‐O sulfation rather than the identity of the proteoglycan backbone maybe a critical determinant for binding. Here, we tested in mammalian cells whether SULF1 or SULF2, human endosulfatases, which remove 6‐O sulfates from HSPGs, modulate Chlamydia infection. Ectopic expression of SULF1 or SULF2 in HeLa cells, which decreases cell surface HSPG sulfation, diminished C. muridarum binding and decreased vacuole formation. ShRNA depletion of endogenous SULF2 in a cell line that primarily expresses SULF2 augmented binding and increased vacuole formation. C. muridarum infection of diverse cell lines resulted indownregulation of SULF2 mRNA. In a murine model of acute pneumonia, mice genetically deficient in both endosulfatases or in SULF2 alone demonstrated increased susceptibility to C. muridarum lung infection. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that the level of HSPG 6‐O sulfation is a critical determinant of C. muridarum infection in vivo and that 6‐O endosulfatases are previously unappreciated modulators of microbial pathogenesis.     

Target Cell Cyclophilins Facilitate Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Infection

Following attachment to primary receptor heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG), human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) particles undergo conformational changes affecting the major and minor capsid proteins, L1 and L2, respectively. This results in exposure of the L2 N-terminus, transfer to uptake receptors, and infectious internalization. Here, we report that target cell cyclophilins, peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerases, are required for efficient HPV16 infection. Cell surface cyclophilin B (CyPB) facilitates conformational changes in capsid proteins, resulting in exposure of the L2 N-terminus. Inhibition of CyPB blocked HPV16 infection by inducing noninfectious internalization. Mutation of a putative CyP binding site present in HPV16 L2 yielded exposed L2 N-terminus in the absence of active CyP and bypassed the need for cell surface CyPB. However, this mutant was still sensitive to CyP inhibition and required CyP for completion of infection, probably after internalization. Taken together, these data suggest that CyP is required during two distinct steps of HPV16 infection. Identification of cell surface CyPB will facilitate the study of the complex events preceding internalization and adds a putative drug target for prevention of HPV–induced diseases.     

Association of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans of Schwann cells with extracellular matrix proteins

The terminal differentiation of Schwann cells is dependent on contact with basement membrane. The present study was undertaken to investigate the role of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) in mediating Schwann cell responses to extracellular matrix contact. Phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C-releasable cell surface HSPGs purified from cultures of neonatal rat Schwann cells were subjected to affinity chromatography on immobilized laminin and fibronectin. Binding of the HSPG to both affinity matrices was observed. The strength of the association, however, was sensitive to the ionic strength of the buffer. In 0.1 M Tris-HCl, HSPG binding was essentially irreversible whereas in physiological ionic strength buffer (e.g. 0.142 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris), weaker binding was detected as a delay in elution of the HSPG from the affinity columns. Further studies of HSPG-laminin binding suggested that the binding was mediated by the glycosaminoglycan chains of the proteoglycans. Results of equilibrium gel filtration chromatography provided additional evidence for a reversible association of the HSPG and laminin with a Kd of approximately 1 x 10(-6) M. When Schwann cells were plated on plastic dishes coated with laminin, the cells attached and extended long slender processes. Inclusion of heparin, but not chondroitin sulfate, in the assay medium resulted in partial inhibition of process extension, but at concentrations of heparin which were higher than that needed to disrupt laminin-HSPG association in vitro. Addition of anti-integrin receptor antibodies resulted in more extensive inhibition of laminin-dependent process extension. Anti-integrin antibodies plus heparin essentially totally inhibited laminin-dependent process extension. These results demonstrate that cell surface HSPGs are capable of reversible association with extracellular matrix molecules and suggest that HSPG-laminin interactions play a role in laminin-dependent Schwann cell spreading.     

Ligand-induced coupling versus receptor pre-association: cellular automaton simulations of FGF-2 binding

The binding of basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) to its cell surface receptor (CSR) and subsequent signal transduction is known to be enhanced by heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). HSPGs bind FGF-2 with low affinity and likely impact CSR-mediated signaling via stabilization of FGF-2-CSR complexes via association with both the ligand and the receptor. What is unknown is whether HSPG associates with CSR in the absence of FGF-2. In this paper, we determine conditions by which pre-association would impact CSR-FGF-2-HSPG triad formation assuming diffusion-limited surface reactions. Using mean-field rate equations, we show that (i) when [HSPG] is much higher than [CSR], the presence of pre-formed complexes does not affect the steady state of FGF-2 binding, and (ii) when the concentrations are comparable, the presence of pre-formed complexes substantially increases the steady-state concentration of FGF-2 bound to CSR. These findings are supported by explicit cellular automaton simulations, which justify the mean-field treatment. We discuss the advantages of such a two-receptor system compared to a single-receptor model, when the parameters are comparable. Further, we speculate that the observed high concentration of HSPG in intact cells ([HSPG]-100[CSR]) provides a way to ensure that the binding levels of FGF-2 to its signaling receptor remains high, irrespective of the presence of pre-formed CSR-HSPG complexes on the cell surface, while allowing the cell to finely tune the response to FGF-2 via down-regulation of the signaling receptor.     

Identification of cell surface molecules that interact with pseudorabies virus.

The alphaherpesvirus pseudorabies virus (PrV) has been shown to attach to cells by interaction between the viral glycoprotein gC and cell membrane proteoglycans carrying heparan sulfate chains (HSPGs). A secondary binding step requires gD and presumably another, hitherto unidentified cellular receptor. By use of a virus overlay protein binding assay (VOPBA), cosedimentation analyses, and affinity chromatography, we identified three species of cell membrane constituents that bind PrV. By treatment with EDTA, peripheral HSPGs of very high apparent molecular mass (>200 kDa) could be extracted from Madin-Darby bovine kidney cells. Binding of PrV to these HSPGs in the VOPBA was sensitive to enzymatic digestion with heparinase or papain. Cosedimentation analyses indicated that binding between PrV and high-molecular-weight HSPG depended on the presence of gC in the virion. In addition, adsorption of radiolabeled PrV virions to cells could be inhibited by the addition of purified high-molecular-weight HSPG. By using urea extraction buffer, a second species of HSPG of approximately 140 kDa could be solubilized. Binding of PrV to this HSPG in the VOPBA was also dependent on the presence of heparan sulfate, since reactivity was abolished after suppression of glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis with NaClO3 and after heparinase treatment. In addition to HSPG, in cellular membrane extracts obtained by treatment with mild detergent, a 85-kDa membrane protein was demonstrated to bind PrV in the VOPBA and affinity chromatography. In summary, we identified three species of cell membrane constituents that bind PrV: a peripheral HSPG of high molecular weight, an integral HSPG of approximately 140 kDa, and an integral membrane protein of 85 kDa. It is tempting to speculate that interaction between PrV and the two species of HSPG mediates primary attachment of PrV and that the 85-kDa protein is involved in a subsequent attachment step.     

Bovine papillomavirus type 1 infection is mediated by SNARE syntaxin 18

Events that lead to viral infections include the binding of the virus to the target cells, internalization of the virus into the cells, and the ability of the viral genome to be expressed. These steps are mediated by cellular and viral proteins and are temporally regulated. The papillomavirus capsid consists of two virally encoded capsid proteins, L1 and L2. Much is known about the role of the major capsid protein L1 compared to what is known of the role of the L2 protein. We identified the interaction of the L2 protein with SNARE protein syntaxin 18, which mediates the trafficking of vesicles and their cargo between the endoplasmic reticulum, the cis-Golgi compartment, and possibly the plasma membrane. Mutations of L2 residues 41 to 44 prevented the interaction of L2 protein with syntaxin 18 in cotransfection experiments and resulted in noninfectious pseudovirions. In this paper, we describe that syntaxin 18 colocalizes with infectious bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV1) pseudovirions during infection but does not colocalize with the noninfectious BPV1 pseudovirions made with an L2 mutant at residues 41 to 44. We show that an antibody against BPV1 L2 residues 36 to 49 (alpha L2 36-49) binds to in vitro-generated BPV1 pseudoviral capsids and does not coimmunoprecipitate syntaxin 18- and BPV1 L2-transfected proteins. alpha L2 36-49 was able to partially or completely neutralize infection of BPV1 pseudovirions and genuine virions. These results support the dependence of syntaxin 18 during BPV1 infection and the ability to interfere with infection by targeting the L2-syntaxin 18 interaction and further define the infectious route of BPV1 mediated by the L2 protein.     

The cell surface proteoglycan syndecan-1 mediates fibroblast growth factor-2 binding and activity

Binding of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) to receptor tyrosine kinases (FGFRs) and signaling is facilitated by binding of FGF to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). There are multiple families of HSPGs, including extracellular and cell surface forms. An important and potentially controversial question is whether cell surface forms of HSPGs act as positive or negative regulators of FGF signaling. This study examines the ability of the cell surface HSPG syndecan-1 to regulate FGF binding and signaling. HSPG-deficient Raji lymphoma cells, expressing a transfected syndecan-1 cDNA (Raji S1 cells), were used as HSPG “donor” cells. BaF3 cells, expressing an FGFR1 cDNA (FR1C-11 cells), were used as FGFR “reporter” cells. Using Raji S1 cells preincubated with FGF, it was found that they formed heterotypic aggregates with FR1C-11 cells in the presence of FGF-2, but not FGF-1. In addition, the FR1C-11 cells demonstrated FGF-2, but not FGF-1, dependent survival when cultured on fixed Raji S1 cells. Thus, Raji syndecan-1 (1) differentially regulates the binding and signaling of FGFs 1 and 2 and (2) acts as a positive regulator of FGF-2 signaling. J. Cell. Physiol. 174:310–321, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

GLUT1 is not the primary binding receptor but is associated with cell-to-cell transmission of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1

GLUT1 has recently been suggested to be a binding receptor for human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1). We used a novel, short-term assay to define the role of GLUT1 in cell-to-cell transmission. Although increasing cell surface levels of GLUT1 enhanced HTLV-I transfer, efficient virus spread correlated largely with heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) expression on target cells. Moreover, since activated CD4+ T cells and cord blood lymphocytes that are susceptible to HTLV-1 infection expressed undetectable levels of surface GLUT1, these results indicate that GLUT1 and HSPGs are important for efficient cell-to-cell transmission of HTLV-1 but raise concerns on the role of GLUT1 as the HTLV-1 primary binding receptor.     

Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans Containing a Glypican 5 Core and 2-O-Sulfo-iduronic Acid Function as Sonic Hedgehog Co-receptors to Promote Proliferation

Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) signaling is crucial for growth, cell fate determination, and axonal guidance in the developing nervous system. Although the receptors Patched (Ptch1) and Smoothened (Smo) are required for Shh signaling, a number of distinct co-receptors contribute to these critical responses to Shh. Several membrane-embedded proteins such as Boc, Cdo, and Gas1 bind Shh and promote signaling. In addition, heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) have also been implicated in the initiation of Shh responses. However, the attributes of HSPGs that function as co-receptors for Shh have not yet been defined. Here, we identify HSPGs containing a glypican 5 core protein and 2-O-sulfo-iduronic acid residues at the nonreducing ends of the glycans as co-receptors for Shh. These HSPG co-receptors are expressed by cerebellar granule cell precursors and promote Shh binding and signaling. At the subcellular level, these HSPG co-receptors are located adjacent to the primary cilia that act as Shh signaling organelles. Thus, Shh binds to HSPG co-receptors containing a glypican 5 core and 2-O-sulfo-iduronic acid to promote neural precursor proliferation.